╌>

Illinois Senate candidate launches campaign ad featuring people saying ‘F— Trump’

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  s  •  9 months ago  •  76 comments

Illinois Senate candidate launches campaign ad featuring people saying ‘F— Trump’

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Former Illinois Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton (D) on Thursday released a new campaign ad featuring several Prairie State residents, including Sen.   Tammy Duckworth   (D-Ill.), all saying, “F— Trump.”

“They said it, not me,” Stratton says in the video   posted on her social media .






She added that she’s “not scared of a wannabe dictator. I’m running for Senate to stand up to Donald Trump.” Stratton said she will abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and “hold Trump accountable for the crimes he’s committed.”

After another batch of “F— Trump” messages, including from Duckworth, Illinois Gov.   JB Pritzker   (D) appears next to Stratton to say “Vote Juliana.”

Stratton is seeking retiring Sen.   Dick Durbin’s   (D-Ill.) seat, with the state’s primary taking place on March 7. Polling averages from   Decision Desk HQ   show Stratton trailing behind Rep.   Raja Krishnamoorthi   (D-Ill.) with 18.5 percent compared to Krishnamoorthi’s 30.5 percent as of Feb. 3.


The two candidates, along with Rep.   Robin Kelly   (D-Ill.), went toe-to-toe during an hour-long debate   last month . Trump and ICE were among the biggest topics to loom over the course of the debate, with Kelly saying she filed letter of impeachment for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

Stratton attacked Krishnamoorthi for   backing a resolution   thanking “law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland.” But Krishnamoorthi pushed back, saying the resolution was focused condemning an antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colo.

She also accused Krishnamoorthi of being ineffective in Congress when answering a question about term limits. Stratton said the four bills Krishnamoorthi passed were about naming postal offices.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

I thought I'd given everyone so upset at Trump swearing to vent their anger at a Senator appearing in a scripted campaign ad saying "Fuck Trump"  

Nothing off the cuff about it.   Given how mad so many progressives are at Trump, I'm sure they'll denounce Senator Duckworth and Illinois's Lt. Governor.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    9 months ago
I thought I'd given everyone so upset at Trump swearing to vent their anger at a Senator appearing in a scripted campaign ad saying "Fuck Trump"  

There is a major difference between the face, voice, and hand of our nation engaging in unpresidential behavior PUBLICLY and anyone else (including public figures).

It never should be done in public, but I defy you to find a PotUS publicly, intentionally, repeatedly engaging in foul language, making childish insults, trolling, etc.

I am not talking about hot mics but rather a steady pattern of crude, insulting rhetoric that is the opposite of 'presidential'.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @1.1    9 months ago

Sean is desperate to find some way to make Trump look better. Cant be done. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.2  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @1.1    9 months ago
mfy you to find a PotUS publicly, intentionally, repeatedly engaging in foul language, making childish insults, trolling, etc

Duckworth & Company SCRIPTED this out. To appeal to Democratic primary voters.  ,foul language, making childish insults, trolling are obviously what Democrats want. That's the entirety of Gavin Newsom's appeal to Democrats.. 

Spare me the complaining about Trump's off the cuff reaction. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.2    9 months ago

Of course you deflect from the fact that Trump is clearly the most unpresidential PotUS in our lifetimes (and likely our history) and instead run to the typical partisan 'bad D' crap.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.3    9 months ago

they just want to muddy the water

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.2    9 months ago
but I defy you to find a PotUS publicly, intentionally, repeatedly engaging in foul language, making childish insults, trolling, etc.

Why engage in sophomoric deflection? If you could not answer the question, it is better to remain quiet than play the fool.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.6  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.3    9 months ago

It's not a deflection, at all. It's literally the entire point of the comment you replied to.   I've pointed out that Democratic partisans who pretend to be so upset by Trump's use of foul language trolling etc.,... are perfectly fine with Democratic politicians doing it. This is a scripted AD specifically designed to appeal to Democratic primary featuring a US Senator that  consists of  people saying "Fuck Trump!" Obviously, the people who study Democratic voters know what they like. 

Neither you, nor any other partisan democrat is attacking a US Senator for using ,foul language, making childish insults, and trolling in a scripted AD.  Obviously, it's not Trump's behavior that bothers you. This seed has made clear partisan democrats are fine with foul language, making childish insults, trolling when they do it.  It's why those techniques are used in ads literally designed to appeal to Democrats to gain their support by repeating "Fuck Trump." 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.7  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.6    9 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.6    9 months ago

You do not condemn Trump for being Trump like, because , well, he is Trump and he gets to behave that way because he has anti-woke super powers. But a Democrat does 1/1000th of what Trump does and you are all over it.   And it doesn't occur to you how foolish you look? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.7    9 months ago
I can only imagine how psychologically debilitating it must be to have those thoughts bouncing around in your head 356/24/7.  

Its infinitely better and more worthy than approving of Trump 365/24/7

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.6    9 months ago
I've pointed out that Democratic partisans ...

This ⇡ is your deflection.   The point is that Trump is wholly unfit and is the only PotUS in our lifetimes (and likely history) who has engaged in PUBLIC, INTENTIONAL, REPEATED crude language, gratuitous childish insults, and taunts of anyone who displeases him and of other nations.

He is an embarrassment to the USA.   A shame on us for irrationally, irresponsibly, and unpatriotically electing a psychopath to the presidency.

Neither you, nor any other partisan democrat is attacking a US Senator...

Of course not, I am talking about the presidency.   Further, no US Senator comes even remotely close to the unpresidential, embarrassing, childish behavior of Trump ... not even on their worst days.   (And, of course, I am not nor have ever been a D, you are trolling again.)


Why do you continue to (try to) defend Trump?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.11  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.8    9 months ago
And it doesn't occur to you how foolish you look?

LOL.  You and others here  talk about Trump like he's Hitler. Sometimes literally.  He's the worst everything and the biggest threat to the Republic ever. We've all seen the spiel. And then you turn around and justify it because "Trump does it." Don't you realize how foolish it makes you look to complain about Trump swearing and then turn around and cheer Tammy Duckworth and company intentionally swearing on a scripted ad?  You go From Trump's tactics make him a threat to the Republic to "we just do what Trump does" in the blink of an eye. Given your stated beliefs about Trump, it's no different than citing Hitler as a justification for behavior. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.12  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.10    9 months ago
This ⇡ is your deflection. 

Again, that was literally pointing to the contents of the first post you replied to. Not a deflection.

who has engaged in PUBLIC, INTENTIONAL, REPEATED crude language,

How much more public and intentional does it get than a scripted ad designed to appeal to democratic primary voters that consists of people including a US Senator saying "Fuck Trump?"

f course not, I am talking about the presidency

Right, because that would necessitate admitting Democrats appeal to voters by using  foul language, making childish insults, and trolling. And you are apparently  fine with that. 

But Trump doing those things is a threat to the Republic.

Why do you continue to (try to) defend Trump?

Pointing out the hypocrisy of Democrats is not a defense of Trump. It's pointing out the hypocrisy of Democrats who have no standards other than judging by whether a D or R comes after the persons name. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1.13  Split Personality  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.11    9 months ago
Don't you realize how foolish it makes you look to complain about Trump swearing and then turn around and cheer Tammy Duckworth and company intentionally swearing on a scripted ad? 

Must be different standards than a POTUS who calls out the SCOTUS in a fit of rage and vows not to comply.  A real man child who has dreams of ruling the world, being able to destroy countries and has set diplomacy and democracy back hundreds of years with these stupid tariffs?

Intentionally swearing on a "scripted ad"?  That is some weak sauce, especially for a social media site.

Your own screeds are the perfect example of the relentless whine of meta.

Carry on.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.12    9 months ago

Pathetic, you continue to try to compare Trump to others who, on their worst days, do not come close to Trump's REPEATED, PUBLIC, INTENTIONAL crude, childish, unpresidential rhetoric.

And you continue to ignore the fact that the PotUS is wholly different than any other politician in that the PotUS is the hand, face, and voice of our nation.   Trump is so far off the rails of being presidential, there is no other PotUS that comes close in comparison.

Why do you persist in your feeble attempt to defend this abysmal human being?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1.15  Split Personality  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.7    9 months ago
TDS is real 

Nah, just folk lore for the uniformed masses. A cheap crutch when they have no argument.

I can only imagine how psychologically debilitating it must be to believe ...................................you own thoughts?

Trolling for approval is a very poor look, btw.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.16  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.14    9 months ago

Again, its always "trump is the worst ever, but it's fine when people I support act the same way." 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.17  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.16    9 months ago
Again, its always "trump is the worst ever, but it's fine when people I support act the same way." 

This is total bullshit.   You have no argument so you invent a position (a strawman).   

That is NOT what I have argued.   

I have indeed stated that former PotUS' "do not come close to Trump's REPEATED, PUBLIC, INTENTIONAL crude, childish, unpresidential rhetoric".   In that specific and clearly stated regard, Trump is demonstrably the "worst ever".   You seem to want to tacitly deny that obvious fact.

I have NOT, in any way, claimed it is fine for others to engage in similar rhetoric.   Your strawman is blatantly dishonest.   You have nothing.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.1.18  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.6    9 months ago
Obviously, it's not Trump's behavior that bothers you.

LOL. Nothing more needs to be said when the commenter has reached this level of absurdity.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.1.19  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.11    9 months ago
You and others here  talk about Trump like he's Hitler. Sometimes literally.

Outside the fact that he caused to be killed millions upon millions of people, was Hitler considered to be a bad person? s/

There are parallels, echos, of how Hitler, Mussolini, the Roman Emperors, the Han Dynasty, all came to power by the erosion of norms, the constant use and normalizing of emergency powers, etc. This playbook pretty much fits with the Trump playbook on how he has handled his time in office.

I find that concerning.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.20  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @1.1.19    9 months ago

yeah, but he was really good for the economy ... /s

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.21  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @1.1.15    9 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.22  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.17    9 months ago
his is total bullshit.  

That's literally the argument made here on a daily basis

way, claimed it is fine for others to engage in similar rhetoric

You argue by omission by constantly refusing to criticize Democrats when they behave  exactly like Trump who is "the worst ever"  in your own words. It's always "But Trump" ...

Here again, not a word of criticism for a Senator appearing in a scripted ad saying "Fuck Trump". Because she has a "D" after her name. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.23  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.22    9 months ago
That's literally the argument made here on a daily basis

Just stop with the lies.   That is absurd.  People are against Trump (appropriately) but they do not argue:  "trump is the worst ever, but it's fine when people I support act the same way." 

Trump supporters seem to be doing this often ... just making up shit about 'the other side' since they cannot defend Trump with facts.

You argue by omission by constantly refusing to criticize Democrats when they behave  exactly like Trump who is "the worst ever"  in your own words.

More made up crap from you.   Does it even register with you that I am not criticizing Republicans either except for their failure to rein in Trump?   My key criticism is with Trump and those who continue to enable him.   It has nothing to do with political parties.

It seems that the true partisans cannot fathom the idea that it is possible not to be aligned with a political party.   The true partisan believes that everyone must be just like them and that they are lying if they are not also pure partisans.   Rather pathetic, IMO.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.1.24  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.6    9 months ago

It is always different when a dem does it to some.  The rationalization runs deep in some.  It is pathetic to watch.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.1.25  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.12    9 months ago
Pointing out the hypocrisy of Democrats is not a defense of Trump.

A concept that seems to be difficult for some to grasp.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.26  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @1.1.15    9 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1    9 months ago
Given how mad so many progressives are at Trump, I'm sure they'll denounce Senator Duckworth and Illinois's Lt. Governor.

Nope. They are hypocrites above all else.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Though it is interesting to wonder why scripted obscenity is how experts think you reach the far left democratic voter. It's does demonstrate  how little regard Democrats have for their voters, thinking this staged vulgarity will seem genuine to their voters.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    9 months ago
staged vulgarity will seem genuine to their voters

it's worked on most trump supporters in the last 3 elections and the entire time he's held office ...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  devangelical @2.1    9 months ago

According to the White House it's appropriate and unambiguous.

The video, which was   shared by TMZ   and appeared to be taken on the factory floor, shows Mr. Trump reacting to a heckler who screamed an inaudible phrase. The president appeared to respond by pointing, mouthing "f*** you" and showing his middle finger as he walked away. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung told CBS News: "A lunatic was wildly screaming expletives in a complete fit of rage, and the President gave an appropriate and unambiguous response."
Trump gives heckler middle finger during Ford factory tour; White House says he had "appropriate" reaction - CBS News

Trump wants to be the leader and have everyone act like him, so be it.

Soon there will be nowhere to go but up again, where manners and decorum matter.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.1    9 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.1    9 months ago
the President gave an appropriate and unambiguous response

How can reactionaries possibly complain about what anyone appropriately and unambiguously says about Trump?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @2.1.3    9 months ago

I'm hoping for an incident during the child molester's SOTU speech. too bad "you lie" has been used before ...

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3  Hallux    9 months ago

F -- F -- Trump

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    9 months ago

Fight fire with fire jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4    9 months ago
Fight fire with fire

IT's great to have everyone agree I've been correct about Trump the last decade. It's not his behavior that bothers Democrats, it's the R after his name. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1    9 months ago
IT's great to have everyone agree I've been correct about Trump the last decade. It's not his behavior that bothers Democrats, it's the R after his name. 

Anyone agree?  We'll take a poll.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.1    9 months ago
nyone agree?  We'll take a poll.

The question is does anyone have the self awareness to agree.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.2    9 months ago
The question is does anyone have the self awareness to agree. 

No, the question is how badly can someone deceive themself into believing:  "I've been correct about Trump the last decade. It's not his behavior that bothers Democrats, it's the R after his name."

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.4  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.3    9 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.5  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.4    9 months ago
you are literally cheering  

Show where I am "literally" cheering.

self awareness. 

Something reactionaries never display.  This article, especially comment 4.1, is a good example.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
4.1.6  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.2    9 months ago

Run. Rabbit run

Dig that hole 'gainst the sun

When at last the work is done

Don't sit down it's time to dig another one

Pink Floyd , Breathe

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.7  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1    9 months ago
It's not his behavior that bothers Democrats, it's the R after his name. 

Completely ridiculous, and frankly, bizarre. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1.8  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1    9 months ago
it's the R after his name. 

No, it's the M before his name. Trump and MAGA are collectively RINOs.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.9  bugsy  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.2    9 months ago
The question is does anyone have the self awareness to agree

I agree one hundred percent. It is the reactionaries that are triggered because of the R after his name.

If he still had the D, they would be cheering him as a hero

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @4.1.9    9 months ago

Such nonsense.   You cannot defend Trump, so you project hyperpartisanship onto anyone who criticizes him.

Just pathetic.

If Trump were a D or I (or whatever), it would make no difference whatsoever to me and millions like me who criticize or praise based upon merit and not on party affiliation.

It is the true partisan who cannot even (seem to) conceive of the idea that some people do not defend a particular party no matter what.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.11  Gsquared  replied to  bugsy @4.1.9    9 months ago
the reactionaries are triggered because of the R after his name.

That's hilarious.  Reactionaries LOVE Trump.  All those right wing extremists think his shit doesn't stink.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.12  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.11    9 months ago
All those right wing extremists think his shit doesn't stink.

... any worse than their breaths.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.13  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.5    9 months ago
Show where I am "literally" cheering.

Lol. You literally upvoted John doing that. 

Something reactionaries never display

Physician, heal thyself. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
4.1.15  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.13    9 months ago
Physician, heal thyself.

Ditto

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.16  JohnRussell  replied to  Thomas @4.1.15    9 months ago

There is ZERO chance the Trump era will be viewed favorably by history. Zero.  What are we doing ? 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6  Sparty On    9 months ago

If Trump is nasty for doing it, so is Duckworth.  Thinking anything less is just a rationalization of the triggered.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6.1  JBB  replied to  Sparty On @6    9 months ago

What an obscure state senate candidate does in a primary is no excuse for The President of the United States of America spewing profanities. Butt, we hear Trump's cronies loud and clear...

original

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.1  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @6.1    9 months ago

What an obscure state senate candidate

Tammy Duckworth is a sitting US Senator.  

She was hyped as  a  candidate for VP in 2020 until she got exposed as a moron on one of those talking head Sunday shows.  Of course, her race probably would have torpedoed her candidacy regardless.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.1    9 months ago

Perfectly stated...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @6    9 months ago

Duckworth is not the PotUS; she is not the face, voice and hand of our nation.   Further, she is not routinely (almost daily), publicly engaging in coarse language and childish insults of those who displease her.   There is no comparison.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
6.2.1  Split Personality  replied to  TᵢG @6.2    9 months ago

Thank you TiG.  For some reason they just don't get it or care.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.2  TᵢG  replied to  Split Personality @6.2.1    9 months ago

I think it is just hyperpartisanship.  Some people only seem to care about 'fighting' and 'taunting' the 'other side'.   The emotional drive to attack their perceived political 'enemies' is so important that they will condone and disregard even someone as unfit and dangerous to this nation as Trump.

( And I suspect some are just flat out deluded ... operating in some fantastic alternate political reality. )

I wonder how many people like this are out there?:

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.2.3  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @6.2    9 months ago
There is no comparison.

As we have known for some time here.   There is no hope for rational thinking from the Trump triggered.    No hope.

Duckworth gets no special dispensation simply because she isn’t POTUS.    Thank God by the way.    

Any allusion that what she did is somehow not as bad as Trumps actions, simply because she isn’t POTUS, is not logical.    Not to the untriggered that is.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.4  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @6.2.3    9 months ago
Any allusion that what she did is somehow not as bad as Trumps actions, simply because she isn’t POTUS, is not logical.  

I doubt many people think that the words of a senator are as important or as influential as those of a PotUS.   The PotUS is THE hand, voice, and face of our nation.   

Your attempt to equate the significance of a single senator to a PotUS is laughably ridiculous.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.2.5  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.4    9 months ago

Yep and to give you one more chance to drop another sophomoric insult.

Opinions do vary.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.6  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @6.2.5    9 months ago

You made and then doubled down on a ridiculous comparison.   Expect it to be noted as such.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.2.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sparty On @6.2.3    9 months ago
Any allusion that what she did is somehow not as bad as Trumps actions, simply because she isn’t POTUS, is not logical.

When all else fails some progressives fall back to "it is not as bad as Trump" as rationalization and justifications for the actions.  It shows the argument is lost.

Boorish behavior is boorish behavior and should be called out as such, no matter who is doing it.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.2.8  Sparty On  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.2.7    9 months ago
Boorish behavior is boorish behavior and should be called out as such, no matter who is doing it.

Ding, ding, ding …. Give that man a cigar.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.9  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.2.7    9 months ago

Pure projection.   You are stating the bullshit excuse that Trump supporters use, but in reverse.   You, et. al. are continually claiming "not as bad as Biden" as one of your excuses.   You deflect from all the bad of Trump by inventing a fantasy that Biden was worse.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.2.10  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.9    9 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.2.11  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.9    9 months ago

Pure make believe when you have nothing of value to say. But it is good to see you admit boorish only counts when trump is doing it 

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
7  freepress    9 months ago

Read Trump's foul mouth comments from the very beginning of his rallies. It has never stopped.

His foul mouth rants happen like the recent Governors meeting, the daily Truth Social diatribes, he said something like "shut up piggy" to a reporter because he didn't like a question. 

He uses all manner of slurs against women and people of color and MAGA says they love it. "He tells it like it is". No, he feels free to be  nasty foul mouthed any day, any time, anywhere because MAGA could care less.

The baseless plea for civility only goes one way.

Trump doesn't have to be civil and anyone deemed to be on the " left" gets the prissy holier than thou MAGA right wing attack machine treatment while totally ignoring how awful Trump is with his own language and behavior.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
7.1  Gsquared  replied to  freepress @7    9 months ago

Perfectly stated.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8  JohnRussell    9 months ago

Should  people act better than Trump does?  Yes.    If they don't should they be criticized?    Nope. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
8.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @8    9 months ago
If they don't should they be criticized?    Nope. 

Why not?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @8.1    9 months ago

Trump doesn't merit anyone's respect.  Hopefully you will see that and understand that within our lifetimes. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
8.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @8.1.1    9 months ago

That is not my question

 
 

Who is online






92 visitors