Native American Mothers Deserve to Live
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The statistic emerged from a sweeping effort led by Luján , a member of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, who convened 55 experts to examine maternal mortality in Indian Country. Their work examined workforce inequities, access to care, data sovereignty and chronic funding shortfalls that continue to endanger Native women
The convening produced five reports on maternal mortality, documenting a crisis that is both deadly and entirely avoidable. American Indian and Alaska Native women are two to three times more likely than non-Hispanic white women to die from pregnancy-related causes. For those over age 30, the risk rises to four to five times higher. Geography only deepens the divide.
For generations, Native women have given life under health systems that were never built to keep them safe. The finding that these deaths are preventable should horrify the nation.
In Indian Country, it simply confirms what families have been saying all along.
The deaths of Native women are not accidents. They are the predictable outcomes of federal neglect, broken trust responsibilities, and health systems that continue to marginalize Indigenous people.
When experts state that 100 percent of maternal deaths among American Indian and Alaska Native women were preventable, the implication is devastating: these mothers should still be here.
Their children should still have their mothers. Their families should not be left to grieve losses that never had to happen.
The federal government has a trust obligation to provide health care to Native people. Yet the Indian Health Service remains chronically underfunded, understaffed and overstretched. Many Native women must travel hours to receive prenatal or emergency obstetric care. Others encounter facilities without specialists, limited postpartum follow-up or culturally unsafe environments where their concerns are dismissed or ignored.
Pregnancy does not end at childbirth. For Native women, the weeks and months following delivery are among the most dangerous. Postpartum hemorrhage, hypertension, cardiometabolic conditions and mental health challenges are often missed or inadequately treated. Too many Native mothers fall through the cracks once they leave the hospital—if they are fortunate enough to deliver in one.
These outcomes are not simply medical failures; they are policy failures.
For decades, federal Indian policies disrupted Indigenous systems of care that once supported mothers before, during and long after birth. Traditional midwifery, community birthing practices and kinship-based support were pushed aside by institutions that did not understand—or respect—Native ways of knowing. What replaced them was underfunded, inaccessible and often harmful.
Equally troubling is how Native women are erased in data. Misclassification and racial aggregation continue to hide the true scope of maternal mortality among American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian women. When Native women disappear from the data, they disappear from funding formulas, policy priorities and lifesaving interventions.
Data sovereignty is not an academic concept—it is a matter of life and death.
The solutions are not mysterious. Native experts, midwives, clinicians and advocates have laid them out clearly.
We must invest in Indigenous-led maternal health systems that are rooted in culture, community and sovereignty. That includes strengthening the Indian Health Service and Urban Indian Organizations, expanding the Native maternal health workforce and supporting traditional and community-based midwifery models. Tribal nations must have the authority—and resources—to design systems that work for their people.
Congress must also act. Reports and hearings are not enough. Sustained federal funding, accountability measures and enforcement of trust responsibilities are required. Maternal health cannot be addressed through short-term grants or pilot programs that disappear just as progress begins. Pilot programs, when proven effective, must be funded long-term.
Protecting Native women’s health during and after pregnancy is not a partisan issue. It is a moral obligation. How a nation treats its mothers reflects its values. Right now, the United States is failing Native mothers.
Every preventable death represents a life full of promise, a family forever altered, and a community diminished. Native women are the backbone of our nations. When they are not protected, our future is at risk.
We do not need more confirmation that the system is broken. We need the political will to fix it—by listening to Native women, funding Native solutions, honoring tribal sovereignty and finally fulfilling promises that are long overdue.
Native mothers deserve to survive pregnancy. They deserve to thrive after it. And they deserve a health care system that values their lives as much as it values the lives they bring into the world.
-
- Time Period and Scope: The practice was widespread during the 1960s and 1970s, with Wikipedia stating that many Native American women were coerced into sterilization during this time.
- Coercion and Deception:
Native American women were often subjected to sterilization without their full knowledge or informed consent, sometimes being told the procedures were reversible or, in some cases, not being informed at all
.
- IHS Involvement: The Indian Health Service (IHS) and affiliated doctors were directly involved in these actions.
- Eugenics Basis: The practice was rooted in the American eugenics movement, which aimed to control populations of poor and minority women, often targeting Native American women for sterilization while not doing the same for wealthier white women.
- Victims: Women as young as 11 years old were subjected to these procedures.
Thayék gde nwéndëmen — We are all related.
Do not mention Trump/Biden/Obama/Bush - this is NOT a Presidential bashing thread.
Tags
Who is online
86 visitors
Forced sterilization of Native American women, driven by eugenics and carried out by the Indian Health Service (IHS) in the 1960s and 1970s, involved coercing, deceiving, or forcing women—some as young as 11—into sterilization procedures.
Tactics included threats to withhold welfare, lies about reversibility, and performing procedures without informed consent, disproportionately targeting minority populations.
Thanks for posting this. Too many "White Folks" are not aware of this.
Forced sterilization of Native American women, driven by eugenics and carried out by the Indian Health Service (IHS) in the 1960s and 1970s, involved coercing, deceiving, or forcing women—some as young as 11—into sterilization procedures. Tactics included threats to withhold welfare, lies about reversibility, and performing procedures without informed consent, disproportionately targeting minority populations.
More information from the article:
The extent of reparations owed to Native Americans is so vast as to be almost immeasurable.
Sadly, involuntary sterilization is still being conducted on Female tribal members, but not as openly as in the '60's/70's.
There is no amount of reparations that can calm the floods that have been caused by dominant society for Native Americans.
It really makes me sad.
This is under review.
By whom and why?
I think your question is addressed in Comment 4, below.
Hi 1st,
Blogs need to be original material, so I moved this to the main forum.
Thank you - did not know.