╌>

A direct threat

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  9 months ago  •  61 comments

A direct threat
they are going to be held accountable by those who come in opposition to Trump."

In a very strange interview with Preet Bahara, Susan Rice just threatened what she described as the elites in academia and corporate America for cooperating with President Trump. In other words when the left comes back into power there will be some form of retribution. Maybe people will be taken to court or lose their jobs, the implication was clear.

Susan Rice as you may recall was the UN ambassador under Obama among other things as well as being one of those who quietly served behind the scenes in the Biden administration.

OIP.950MPytOFQKK0x-teAfUFQHaF5?rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain&o=7&rm=3
Karen # 3

She was the one that Obama wheeled out on a Sunday morning to explain the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans at the consulate in Libya. On 5 different news shows she told the American people that those attacks were because of a right-wing video. It was a blatant lie. The attack was well planned by a terrorist organization. The reason for the lie was that Obama had been warned that security at the consulate was inadequate. They didn't want people to know the attack was preventable.

And how could we forget the little memo she wrote to herself claiming that Obama had told Clapper & Comey to follow the rules during the final weeks of the Obama administration, which we now know was a meeting in which Obama pushed them to subvert the incoming administration with a hoax concocted by the Clinton campaign.

That's the woman threatening revenge.





She forgot that the left already took revenge. Where was she when they tried to take Trump off half of the nation's ballots? Where was she during the Letitia James frivolous lawsuit that tried to bankrupt Trump or when Alvin Bragg tried to claim Trump's nondisclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels was a federal campaign violation or the ridiculous Carroll lawsuit that cost Trump $90 million or the devious raid on Mar-a-Lago or the two absurd impeachments or the person who leaked his tax documents thinking that Trump underpaid his taxes or all the activist judges who are trying to slow down the Trump agenda.

Karen, you've already had your retribution.



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    9 months ago

And one last thing:

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for democrats coming back into power.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    9 months ago

Ah yes, Benghazi, the dream that never sleeps. Meanwhile on the top bunk Hillary gets questioned about Pizzaghazi.

The game being played on the right is fraught with desperation and already they are eating their own.

As I told you once before, revenge is a dish that devours the chef.

To Susan Rice I say bon apetit and stear clear of Moby.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Hallux @1.1    9 months ago

They are koo-koo

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    9 months ago

There is already a campaign ad out.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    9 months ago

I wouldn't hold my breath hoping republicans remain in power.  The voters are going to put them down like rabid dogs, which is exactly what they are.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Gsquared @1.2    9 months ago

Well, look at what you are up against:

If it is the midterms, you'll be up against the Trump economy in play by June.

If it is 2008, you'll be up against Vance & Rubio. Who do you have?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Senior Silent
1.2.2  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.1    9 months ago

“…Vance & Rubio.”

Give me Shapiro & Kelly for starters. Greater depth of experience and character. Plus the ability to think for themselves. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Hallux  replied to  afrayedknot @1.2.2    9 months ago

Shapiro sews up Pennsylvania as does Kelly with Arizona. California is going nowhere which makes Newsome kinda redundant.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @1.2.2    9 months ago

Shapiro would be great except the democrat party has become very anti-Semitic. They'll never run him for President.

Too bad.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.5  evilone  replied to  Hallux @1.2.3    9 months ago
California is going nowhere which makes Newsome kinda redundant.

Newsome comes with baggage that could lose the Dems votes. He's also got the same air of entitled desperation that Clinton had when she ran. I would probably watch Kelly and/or Shapiro were they to run. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.6  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.4    9 months ago
Shapiro would be great except the democrat party has become very anti-Semitic. They'll never run him for President.

Hahahaha! Good luck with that. Sure we can find some assholes everywhere (especially dumbass kids), but Dems as a group aren't anti-Semitic... they are... and have been, against Israeli aggression in Palestinian areas. Many of those college campus demonstrations were held in coordination with Jewish student groups. There is a whole world of difference there you can't see with those blinders. 

If you'd take those off once in a while you'd see the anti-Sematic MAGA issue that happened just this week when Nick Shirley responded positively to Tyler Oliveira's post of the "Jewish invasion" in New Jersey.

It was so bad Laura Loomer ( you know the one that once wrote she is a white nationalist opposed to left-wing globalist Marxist Jews. ) responded on X:

A lot of people have buyers remorse for supporting another influencer who took the bait. How many GOP lawmakers were photographed with this person? How many White House officials praised him? GOP heading into the midterms with a massive optics issue.

I don't think this is the hill that MAGA wants to die on, but good luck.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.2.7  Jack_TX  replied to  afrayedknot @1.2.2    9 months ago
Give me Shapiro & Kelly for starters.

I agree they would be strong candidates.

The question is whether or not they can get nominated with the base of the party in it's current state.

There is a non trivial probability that the angry white woman vote will galvanize early around a ridiculous, Kamala type, identity politics candidate.

I hope not.  It would be nice to have a decent choice next time.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.8  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.1    9 months ago
If it is the midterms

OK, then.  Go ahead and hold your breath until November.

the Trump economy in play by June

Dream on.

If it is 2008

I would happily vote for Obama again.  Maybe you are thinking about 1908?  Or 1808?  The good old days for right wingers.

Vance and Rubio

An obnoxious jerk and a big nothing.  I hope the republicans run Vance.  If you think Trump's popularity ratings are in the dumpster, just wait.

Who do you have?

Andy Beshear (a Democrat with a 65% favorability rating... in Kentucky!), Josh Shapiro, Mark Kelly, just to name a few.  There are several more who would make well-qualified, excellent candidates.  Wes Moore, for instance, although I do not think this is his time just yet.  Let him gain a bit more experience.  An outstanding guy.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.9  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.4    9 months ago
Shapiro would be great.

But you would NEVER vote for him.  Let's get real.  Whoever the republicans run has your vote.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.10  Gsquared  replied to  evilone @1.2.5    9 months ago

I do not want Newsome or Harris to run.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.11  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.8    9 months ago

maga zealots are busy putting mark kelly on the launch pad for a landslide victory in '28 ...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.12  evilone  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.10    9 months ago
I do not want Newsome or Harris to run.

I concur. I would say Amy Klobuchar, but she's announced a run for MN Governor, so she's out.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.13  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @1.2.11    9 months ago

I would gladly vote for Kelly as would almost all of my friends. "Almost" because we have a Trumpist friend who we all think is out of his mind, and sadly, I have three Trumpist in-laws.  Interestingly, they say they like Shapiro, too.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.14  Gsquared  replied to  evilone @1.2.12    9 months ago

I definitely like Klobuchar.  She is terrific.  I would have listed her, except she is not in the running this time.  She probably decided she would be more effective as Governor, at least for now.

I'm a Californian, born and raised, and a life-long Democrat, as were all of my relatives for generations, but I do not want Newsome or Harris to run for any reason. Not the right candidates.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.2.15  evilone  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.14    9 months ago
I do not want Newsome or Harris to run for any reason.

They do a better job raising money than they do running.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.16  Gsquared  replied to  evilone @1.2.15    9 months ago

They would be the wrong candidates.  I do like how Newsome treats Trump, though.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.16    9 months ago
I do like how Newsome treats Trump, though.

Newsom is Trump Jr, without the comedic chops. No wonder he's leading the  Democratic Primary.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2.18  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.1    9 months ago

2008 will ways belong to OBAMA. lol.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.19  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jack_TX @1.2.7    8 months ago
the angry white woman vote will galvanize early around a ridiculous, Kamala type, identity politics candidate.

You probably consider me an angry white woman, but I like the idea of a Shapiro/Kelly ticket. I also like Andy Beshear

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.20  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @1.2.10    8 months ago

me, neither

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.2.21  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.19    8 months ago
You probably consider me an angry white woman,

I consider you a white woman who projects opinions onto other people that they don't have and never express.

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.2.22  Snuffy  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.19    8 months ago

I could vote for Shapiro but living in Arizona I cannot support Kelly. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2.23  Split Personality  replied to  Snuffy @1.2.22    8 months ago

Pritzker.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.24  Sean Treacy  replied to  Split Personality @1.2.23    8 months ago
Pritzker.

I'd assume most people  who looks at what has happened to Illinois under Pritzker and says "we need that for America" must either be a foreign agent, hate America or be running a grift on taxpayers. People who can, leave that state. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.2.25  Snuffy  replied to  Split Personality @1.2.23    8 months ago

Oh hell no. After what he's done to Illinois there's no way I could vote for him. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2.26  Split Personality  replied to  Snuffy @1.2.25    8 months ago

Never been to Illinois.

Sounds like he inherited 10lbs of shit in a five pound bag and is using legalized gambling to start to turn it around.

Just sounds like more of centrist than some of the others mentioned.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    9 months ago
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for democrats coming back into power.

Apparently Democrats never left power since Trump Republicans seem compelled to kill dead horses.  When only 27% of the electorate are willing to self identify as Republican, beating the very dead Benghazi horse is not a sign of strength.

So far, Trump Republicans can only highlight who they have hurt the most as governing accomplishments.  And beat very dead horses.  Not even DEI Democrats, at their worst, celebrated violence with such zeal as do Trump Republicans.  Trump Republicans have institutionalized government violence into some sort of political litmus test.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.3.1  Split Personality  replied to  Nerm_L @1.3    9 months ago
Not even DEI Democrats, at their worst, celebrated violence with such zeal as do Trump Republicans.  Trump Republicans have institutionalized government violence into some sort of political litmus test.

please don't tell Sean.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Split Personality @1.3.1    9 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.3.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Nerm_L @1.3    8 months ago

Trump Republicans have institutionalized government violence into some sort of political litmus test.

Guess you've forgotten the past 12 years that Dems/Libs have held the government as hostage 'til "We got him this time"????

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.3.4  Nerm_L  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.3    8 months ago
Guess you've forgotten the past 12 years that Dems/Libs have held the government as hostage 'til "We got him this time"????

I haven't forgotten Obama's regime change.  And BENGHAZI.  When are we circling back to red lines in the sand?  It's deja vu all over again.

OBAMA IS BACK!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.5  devangelical  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.3    8 months ago
Guess you've forgotten the past 12 years

guess you've forgotten the last 50 years of your hero denigrating native americans, or maybe not ...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.4  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    9 months ago

She forgot that the left already took revenge. Where was she when they tried to take Trump off half of the nation's ballots?

At home?

Where was she during the Letitia James frivolous lawsuit that tried to bankrupt Trump

Frivolous? Like all of the mortgage fraud cases Pulte keeps raising against professional black women that Trump wants to make disappear?  Pulte who has also been rumored to have advised his relatives to use the same "tricks".

Bill Pulte accused Fed Governor Lisa Cook of fraud. His relatives filed housing claims similar to hers - The Economic Times

or when Alvin Bragg tried to claim Trump's nondisclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels was a federal campaign violation

A rose by any other name is still a bribe, is it not?

or the ridiculous Carroll lawsuit that cost Trump $90 million

which he continues to appeal in order to not pay one dime to her, it's the American way. /s

Trump Bid To Get U.S. Taxpayers To Pay E. Jean Carroll $85M Denied by Appeals Court, "Keeps Losing to an Old Woman"

or the devious raid on Mar-a-Lago

Devious is a bit emotional isn't it?

or the two absurd impeachments

All legal...

or the person who leaked his tax documents thinking that Trump underpaid his taxes

this is the game that the Uber rich play. Ever wonder who owns all of these eyeglass kiosks  pr bakeries that are never open?  Write offs.

or all the activist judges who are trying to slow down the Trump agenda.

Many of whom he appointed to be loyal to the HIM instead of the Constitution.  Not a surprise when we have reached this level of CRAZY that even a few on SCOTUS  have found their 

spines and their secret Constitution decoding rings to do their jobs on behalf of all Americans.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Of course there will be. They are an organized crime group 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    9 months ago
They are an organized crime group

Well, Trump runs more of an 'organized crime family'. And 'organized' is being used very loosely there. He pretty much just says out loud what he wants in semi-question form, and then all his little shit eating sycophants run around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to get it for him. And the metaphorical blood spurting out their still running bodies is sticky crimson praise for their dear Lord and master Donald Trump. "Democrats are getting a big boost in the polls for some reason, I think the President should be able to federalize the elections. Wouldn't that be better, if everyone who was a real American, which we'll determine by whether they vote for me or not, just got to vote for me and we could just ignore those other votes? That's how my buddy Vlad does it and he says it's the best"... and off his ball licking sycophants go to try and federalize the elections. Talk about a 'direct threat'.[✘]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    9 months ago
I think the President should be able to federalize the elections.

Which is what democrats wanted to do.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    9 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.2    9 months ago

Stop lying

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3  MrFrost    9 months ago

Ambassador Stevens was told not to go, he went anyway...FAFO. Case closed.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @3    9 months ago

What difference does it make!

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    9 months ago

What difference does it make!

No provide the WHOLE quote....LOL [✘] can't put it in context, can you?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4  MrFrost    9 months ago

BENGHAZI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Everyone drink!!!!)

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5  Jeremy Retired in NC    9 months ago
In other words when the left comes back into power there will be some form of retribution.

Do they have any other platform to run on?  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1  devangelical  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5    9 months ago

a revenge and retribution platform got the felon/traitor/child molester elected 16 months ago ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  devangelical @5.1    9 months ago

You've got a pretty active imagination.

felon/traitor/child molester

Despite ya'lls hissy fits, it's still unproven.

elected 16 months ago ...

Oh please, the tantrum you all have been throwing has been going well over a decade now.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
5.1.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.1    9 months ago
Despite ya'lls hissy fits, it's still unproven.

only the child molester part has not been proven, but, it's coming

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Igknorantzruls @5.1.2    9 months ago

53 missing pages.

Find the real ones and he's toast.

Don't find them and he's still toast, right out of the GOP dirty tricks book by Lee Atwater, Roger Stone and company.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Split Personality @5.1.3    9 months ago
ind the real ones and he's toast.

Lol The Guardian has them and publised a summary.   They show the "accuser" is a criminal lunatic.

Don't tell me you actually believed  Biden's  FBI covered  up Trump raping a teenager?  Lol.  That makes Qanon look rational. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.4    9 months ago

Why are they missing?

Why would you believe The Guardian? Oh, never mind, that's obvious...

Always off topic with the slander, your people must be so proud.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Igknorantzruls @5.1.2    8 months ago

Lets see.  The "felon" part had to use a law that nobody has ever been charged with that was past it's statute of limitations the "traitor" part hasn't been proven.  So I'd say that NONE of hit has been proven.  Especially AFTER 10 years of investigations that turned up nothing but the Democrats fabricating the nonsense.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
5.1.7  1stwarrior  replied to  devangelical @5.1    8 months ago

Nope - Biden/Kamala, both traitors/molesters/daughter abuser, were very properly disposed of, and, as usual, the Dems/Libs lost and will continue to do so.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6  Nerm_L    9 months ago

Benghazi happened 13 years ago.  How many Obama hold overs survived Trump's 1st term?  How many hold overs are left in Trump's 2nd term?

Trump campaigned on draining this swamp.  The continued petulant whining about decades-old issues tells us that Trump cannot keep his promise of creating a transparent bureaucracy that conforms to the rule of law.  Has Trump become another swamp critter?  

Trump has turned the Epstein files into the new Benghazi.  And it is going to blow back on Trump.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.1  evilone  replied to  Nerm_L @6    9 months ago
Has Trump become another swamp critter?  

Trump has always been an optimistic swamp critter.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
6.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  evilone @6.1    9 months ago

Trump, using Gnome, Patel and Barbie has epitomized the retribution campaign as every one at DOJ, DHS and the FBI who ever investigated Trump has been fired without cause.

The last straw was Cannon "permanently" sealing the Jack Smith Report Part 2.

In your face liberals, take that!   /s

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  Split Personality @6.1.1    9 months ago
The last straw was Cannon "permanently" sealing the Jack Smith Report Part 2.

A total abuse of justice.  She should be impeached.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
6.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.2    9 months ago

Disbarred.

 
 

Who is online










95 visitors