╌>

This week, Donald Trump will turn U.S. airports into dystopian hellholes.

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  bob-nelson  •  8 months ago  •  216 comments

By:   Miles Taylor

This week, Donald Trump will turn U.S. airports into dystopian hellholes.



Long lines.

ICE watchmen.

Sudden arrests.

Soaring prices.

How Donald Trump's heavy hand will be visible in every terminal.


original




I wonder how many TSA agents ICE will arrest. There are s-o-o-o-o many who speak Spanish - a sure sign that they're illegals!



S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


512 If you travel through an American airport this week, you may not recognize the country you’re in. Just know this: it’s all by design.

Travelers at any major U.S. airport will soon feel like they’ve entered a foreign land. Long lines will snake out the doors. ICE agents will patrol the terminals looking for people to pluck out, arrest, and deport. And soaring ticket prices (in some cases,  double or triple  what they cost just a month ago) will hit travelers like a gut punch, giving them the kind of economic vertigo more commonly associated with countries suffering from runaway inflation.

All of it will have a single source: Donald Trump.

Indeed, the U.S. airport is about to become the most visible symbol of America’s speedy slide into autocracy.

I’ll start with the lines.

Since February 14th, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been operating without full congressional funding. Republicans cannot pass a DHS spending bill on their own (a remarkable failure for a party that holds majorities in both the House and Senate). Democrats have refused to supply the necessary votes until the administration agrees to some basic conditions to prevent DHS from becoming the centerpiece of a police state.  Basic conditions.

Democrats are not demanding the dismantling of ICE or a reversal of the administration’s immigration agenda, although personally I think they should. In fact, from a legal perspective, their demands sound almost meager. In exchange for their votes to fund DHS, they’re asking that ICE agents identify themselves when making arrests, that people detained be told why they are being arrested, that agents not kick down doors without Fourth Amendment warrants, and that individuals not be disappeared into a shadow network of detention facilities before their families or lawyers can locate them.

In other words, Democrats are insisting that the federal government obey the U.S. Constitution.

The White House has said “no.” Instead, Trump has chosen to make the standoff  your  problem. That is, if you have any plans to travel through a U.S. airport in the near future, the administration wants you to suffer. By design. The president of the United States is betting that you’ll be willing to forfeit your constitutional rights in frustration rather than deal with long lines at the airport and mounting flight cancellations. Seriously. And unfortunately, he may be right.

Fifty thousand TSA workers — essential employees legally required to show up — have been working without pay for over a month. More than 400  have quit . And travelers at some of the nation’s busiest airports have been told to arrive as much as  five hours early . The whole situation is expected to spiral further this coming Friday, March 27, when airport screeners are slated to miss their second paycheck.

All of this is happening on purpose.

The White House is hoping that by the time enough families are stranded in security lines with their luggage and screaming children, they’ll be angry enough to demand that whoever is “blocking” a deal just give in already! “Please,” they’ll shout to their representatives, “give Trump whatever he wants!” And what Trump wants is to keep doing what he’s been doing at DHS, including  illegally jailing  thousands and thousands of people, including American citizens, residents, visitors, and immigrants.

The White House says it’s going to send DHS agents to the airports to try to alleviate the suffering. But as always, the president let his real intentions slip this weekend.

Trump announced  on Truth Social  that, starting today, he would deploy ICE agents across U.S. airports to “do security like no one has ever seen before.” This includes patrolling terminals to identify people for “immediate arrest,” he said, if they’re suspected of not having lawful status. He told ICE to “GET READY.”

Anyone who has closed their eyes to the president’s authoritarian crackdown is going to have a hard time keeping them shut if they have travel plans. It’s worth pausing here to note that the U.S. Constitution guarantees Americans the right to travel freely within their own country. It’s not a conditional right. It’s also not a “privilege” extended at the government’s discretion.

Yet this week, the airports through which Americans exercise the right to freely travel will be patrolled by agents that the country has already seen brutally kill their fellow citizens, arrest lawful residents without any due process whatsoever, and  disappear people into a secret network of detention facilities  being constructed beyond public scrutiny. A year ago, most Americans could not have imagined this is what their country would look like.

But that’s not all.

The planes that U.S. travelers are boarding are fast becoming too expensive to afford, as prices surge and airlines consider scrapping routes altogether. The reason, again, is Trump. His war against Iran, which was launched without congressional authorization and which  92 percent of Americans  believe should be ended ASAP, has sent global oil prices into a death spiral. Trump  has tried to convince Americans  that high prices are actually good for them.

The airport, then, is where all of it converges this week. Terminals are about to become dystopian hellholes, symbolic of everything happening in the United States. Trump’s campaign to assert his power domestically, intimidate the political opposition, transform DHS into his secret police, ignore the law, and launch wars wherever he damn well pleases… will show up in the one place that’s already stressful enough to visit.

More specifically, the long lines are his wager that he can frustrate you into surrendering your constitutional rights. The ICE agents — and the people plucked from the crowd in front of you — will be a reminder of who’s running this country and how the man in charges views his total authority. And the soaring prices will remain his unapologetic tax levied on the world for a war most of them don’t support.

So here’s to hoping that the millions of Spring Breakers who pass through those terminals don’t just bury their heads in the sand when they get to the beach. If they do, they’ll come home without a democracy.


Red Box Rules

Whatever


 

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    8 months ago
The White House says it’s going to send DHS agents to the airports to try to alleviate the suffering. But as always, the president let his real intentions slip this weekend. Trump announced   on Truth Social   that, starting today, he would deploy ICE agents across U.S. airports to “do security like no one has ever seen before.”

This includes patrolling terminals to identify people for “immediate arrest,” he said, if they’re suspected of not having lawful status. He told ICE to “GET READY.”
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    8 months ago

Actually flight travellers are appreciative of anything which will improve wait time

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    8 months ago

This is Trump yet again sending in his goons to try to coerce Congress.   

How in hell will untrained ICE personnel help matters?   That is not how systems work.   Throwing untrained bodies at a problem typically makes things worse.   Especially if these individuals are geared up to be aggressive (as opposed to police officers who are generally geared to keep the peace and order).

They could help with peripheral issues (e.g. directing crowd traffic) that require no special training.   But they cannot address the key short-term problem of the lack of trained TSA staff.

Far better would be for the fucking PotUS to ensure TSA (and other critical services) do NOT get disrupted by idiots in Congress who endlessly play politics at the expense of the American people.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.1  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1    8 months ago
fucking PotUS to ensure TSA

The President doesn't write legislation; he does not vote on it, he signs it or vetoes. I believe he has the majority of Republicans voting to reopen the Government.  The big item in this is Voter ID which is an 80% issue and funding the government (not ICE) which includes TSA. What else would you like him to do? 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.1    8 months ago

No shit! 

The PotUS does, however, influence Congress.   How is it that you do not know that?   Trump has been influencing Congress his entire term.   Even before he was elected.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.3  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.2    8 months ago
No shit! 

Are you confused, Trump has influenced Congress, 80% of the voters WANT photo ID, ICE is already funded!  Democrats are keeping Government closed, not Trump. What part of that don't you understand?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1    8 months ago
How in hell will untrained ICE personnel help matters?

How long do we think it takes somebody to be trained on the metal detecting wand?  

They already know how to check IDs.  They already use sniffer dogs to search for illegal substances.  The X-ray viewer might take a few days to learn. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.5  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.4    8 months ago

They mainly know how to shoot people.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.1.5    8 months ago

Well damn, they are failing then.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.3    8 months ago

Since you recognize that Trump has influenced Congress greatly, you should then be able to figure out what I meant by:

TiG@2.1 ☞ Far better would be for the fucking PotUS to ensure TSA (and other critical services) do NOT get disrupted by idiots in Congress who endlessly play politics at the expense of the American people.

In super super simple terms I am saying that Trump should use his influence to avoid the disruption of critical services such as TSA.

See?   You know he could get the GOP Congress to ensure the TSA is properly and consistently funded.

You are trolling.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.4    8 months ago
How long do we think it takes somebody to be trained on the metal detecting wand?  

ChatGPT:

At an airport checkpoint, the metal-detection wand is not supposed to be operated by a random helper. It is part of secondary screening performed by a Transportation Security Officer (TSO) or similarly trained checkpoint officer.

TSA’s own TSO career materials say officers receive initial training and then must complete an immersive two-to-three week training program at the TSA Academy , followed by continuing training. TSA also describes TSO duties as operating screening equipment, performing searches and screening, and implementing applicable standard operating procedures. ( Transportation Security Administration )

TSA’s medical/essential-functions guidance also shows that checkpoint officers are expected to work with the walk-through metal detector (WTMD) and to handle the follow-on screening process, including maintaining control of passengers who alarm and checking that the detector is functioning properly. That supports the basic point that this is treated as a trained checkpoint function, not casual crowd-help work. ( Transportation Security Administration )

At the statutory level, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act says screeners who perform hand-held metal detector searches of individuals must have sufficient dexterity and capability to thoroughly conduct those procedures. ( Transportation Security Administration )

So the practical answer is:

You generally need to be a trained TSA screening officer, complete TSA initial training plus academy training, and be qualified on checkpoint screening procedures. It is not a stand-alone “few minutes and you’re good” task in the way people often assume. ( Transportation Security Administration )

You are of course over-simplifying a major systemic change.   The change is the introduction of a workforce that is wholly untrained and likely not of the right temperament to perform TSA jobs.  

The best outcome would be if the ICE workforce focused on crowd control and not try to instantly become TSA personnel.   If this stupid move by Trump continues over time, then it makes sense to have ICE workers be vetted and trained in an accelerated fashion so that they can assume some of the low-level TSA positions.


A smart solution is to not play political chicken with critical services such as TSA.   But that requires a leader who has the best interests of the nation in mind.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.9  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.8    8 months ago
ChatGPT

I don't read what you won't type yourself.

You are of course over-simplifying a major systemic change.  

No, you're overcomplicating a minor temporary substitution of moderately skilled labor. 

There are skilled TSA jobs and then there are jobs that any LEO could take over with minimal additional training.

likely not of the right temperament 

Oh FFS.  Are these paper or plastic straws at which you're grasping?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.9    8 months ago
I don't read what you won't type yourself.

So you do not read links to articles, seeds, legal documents, etc.?   You are being ridiculous.   It is your loss if you petulantly refuse to read anything from an AI source.

There are skilled TSA jobs and then there are jobs that any LEO could take over with minimal additional training.

Not only do you look down upon TSA jobs but you are thinking at the job level instead of the system level.   This is not just bringing in someone to help, it is bringing in an army of untrained 'helpers'.   System dynamics rules here and you completely ignore the complexities.

Are these paper or plastic straws at which you're grasping?

How naive to think that the poorly vetted, poorly trained ICE workforce that implements a forcible roundup of human beings has the right temperament to deal civilly with a frustrated public.

To do work like that of the TSA, one needs to stay cool, professional, and know how to be stern while keeping the public cool.   That is not how ICE works. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.11  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.10    8 months ago
This is not just bringing in someone to help, it is bringing in an army of untrained 'helpers'.

When was the last time you flew out of a US airport?

How many TSA agents did you see?  What were their jobs?

How naive to think that the poorly vetted, poorly trained ICE workforce that implements a forcible roundup of human beings has the right temperament to deal civilly with a frustrated public

How utterly ridiculous to assume that people are only capable of one "demeanor" for all situations, and that LEOs will somehow treat every interaction with everyone the same way they treat the pursuit of illegal immigrants.

The idea that you could possibly be serious about this is somewhere between hilarious and staggering.

I'm fascinated.  How far does this madness go? 

Since "demeanor" is somehow fixed and independent of location or situation, do you just assume these men go home, beat their wives and slam their 8 year olds up against the squad car?  Do you think they're fingerprinting everyone at the t-ball game? Do you think they're checking IDs of all the people in their Sunday School class? 

How deep does this run?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.12  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.11    8 months ago
When was the last time you flew out of a US airport?  How many TSA agents did you see?  What were their jobs?

Entirely irrelevant questions.   You are trying to judge the training required of a TSA agent by observing the interactions as a mere passenger.   

How utterly ridiculous to assume that people are only capable of one "demeanor" for all situations, and that LEOs will somehow treat every interaction with everyone the same way they treat the pursuit of illegal immigrants.

Best you can do is a strawman?   I made the point that ICE agents (at least those properly trained) have entirely different methods and objectives than TSA.   But with the rapid expansion (more than doubling) of ICE agents, they did not even get fully trained or vetted.    ChatGPT (with links):

ICE and TSA are trained for different jobs .

ICE
ICE personnel are federal law-enforcement officers. On the enforcement side, ICE says ERO officers are trained for immigration law, arrest and custody operations, processing, transport, officer/tactical training, physical techniques, first aid, firearms, and driver training. On the investigations side, ICE personnel go through criminal-investigator training focused on case development, interviewing, surveillance, warrants, and related federal law-enforcement work. ( U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement )

TSA
TSA screeners are trained for transportation-security screening. TSA says Transportation Security Officers are responsible for screening passengers, baggage, and cargo, and new hires complete local/classroom and on-the-job training plus an immersive two-to-three week TSA Academy program. TSA has also said that training was expanded to include more instruction on image interpretation and operating screening technology. ( TSA Jobs )

The clean distinction is:

  • ICE = law enforcement
    Targeted to immigration enforcement, detention/removal, and criminal investigations. ( U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement )

  • TSA = screening/security operations
    Targeted to checkpoint procedures, baggage and passenger screening, prohibited-item detection, and airport security workflow. ( TSA Jobs )

A useful comparison point is TSA’s Security Support Assistant role. TSA says SSAs can help with passenger flow and moving checked bags to and from conveyor systems, but they are not responsible for screening activities . That shows even within TSA, the agency distinguishes between support work and actual screening work. ( TSA Jobs )

So if your underlying question is whether ICE training makes someone a substitute for TSA screening staff, the answer is no . ICE training is aimed at enforcement and investigations; TSA training is aimed at checkpoint screening and aviation-security procedures. ( U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement )

Looks like your posts have devolved into low-grade trolling lacking a real argument.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.13  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.7    8 months ago
You are trolling.

Trolling my ass, place blame where the blame belongs. Why is it always Trump's problem??????? The Democrats are causing this problem because they didn't get their way, bitch at them!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.13    8 months ago

Once again, goose, if Trump so desired, he could ensure that the TSA is paid and is no longer used as political leverage. 

Trump is the PotUS and the Rs in Congress do his bidding most of the time (as you even acknowledged).   So pay the TSA agents and stop fucking with them and the American people.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.15  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.14    8 months ago

IMO the dems got rid of Noem and got Homan to take care of Ice.  He has admitted ICE was not being run correctly.  Rather than take the win the dems are sticking to their abolish ICE bullshit so they can try to get some more votes for the midterms.  As far as I am concerned they are at least as guilty as fucking with the American people and using the TSA as political pawns as the Rep.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.16  evilone  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.14    8 months ago
Trump is the PotUS and the Rs in Congress do his bidding most of the time (as you even acknowledged). 

And Trump has publicly said as late as yesterday for sycophants in Congress not to pass anything that isn't attached to his voting bill. So at this point Trump cares less for TSA Agents than the Dems who are trying to push through funding. 

I don't give Dems a push here either. They could stop playing games and start pushing a non-partisan moderate coalition, but are themselves too afraid of being primaried during this age of hyper-partisan politics. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.17  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.14    8 months ago
he could ensure that the TSA is paid

Talk to Chuckie, he holds the 4 hour waits in his hands. Why are you condoning Illegals voting?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.18  evilone  replied to  goose is back @2.1.17    8 months ago
Why are you condoning Illegals voting?

No one I know is doing that - It's already illegal for non-citizens to vote in all 50 states. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.19  Trout Giggles  replied to  evilone @2.1.18    8 months ago

Nobody is condoning illegals vote. More made up bullshit by the MAGA @#$%

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.20  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.19    8 months ago

more republicans have attempted voter fraud in the last several elections, than the number of ineligible immigrants.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.21  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.15    8 months ago

You are off on a different tangent.   I am talking about fixing a problem the right way:  fund the TSA rather than toss ICE into the equation (making a bigger mess).   Trump is the key to fixing the problem and is the key to GoP opposition to funding TSA.

My point is that Trump can fix this problem by funding TSA.   Congress could fix the problem on its own.   But Trump has unusual control over the GoP (still inexplicable) so the key is for Trump to take action and show some positive leadership.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.22  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.17    8 months ago
Talk to Chuckie, he holds the 4 hour waits in his hands.

Nothing is registering with you.   You refuse to recognize that Trump could easily solve this by funding TSA.

Why are you condoning Illegals voting?

As I noted, you are trolling.   Nowhere do I even hint that I approve of illegals voting.   

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.23  TᵢG  replied to  evilone @2.1.18    8 months ago

Gotta wonder where this crap come from.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.24  evilone  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.23    8 months ago
Gotta wonder where this crap come from.

Right wing populist propaganda bubbles. We've discussed it before... it's confirmation bias.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.25  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.21    8 months ago
fund the TSA rather than toss ICE into the equation

It is the dems that tossed ICE into the equation of funding the TSA and DHS

 I am talking about fixing a problem the right way:

That would be to fund DHS without the ICE carve out

My point is that Trump can fix this problem by funding TSA.  

He could but that is a band aid and not necessarily the best thing to do for DHS.  You can't just ignore ICE as part of the equation.  

The question really becomes if ICE is no longer there what will stop illegals?  Is ICE broken beyond repair?  If Trump doesn't think so why split something that doesn't usually get split? 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.26  goose is back  replied to  evilone @2.1.18    8 months ago
It's already illegal for non-citizens to vote in all 50 states.

I know, so showing an ID to vote isn't a big deal! Showing you are a US Citizen to register to vote isn't a big deal either, is it? 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.27  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.22    8 months ago
Trump could easily solve this

It's not Trump problem, all the Republicans have voted to open the Government.  

Nowhere do I even hint that I approve of illegals voting. 

Yah, that was kind of a troll. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.28  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.25    8 months ago

Just doing everything you can to ignore that the PotUS can influence Congress to fix this problem by funding the TSA rather than bringing in an untrained, inappropriate force to try to shore up TSA.

Of course you view this in partisan terms (blame the Ds) rather than what is best for this nation.

Congress has the ability to just fund the TSA and deal with the rest of the bill as a distinct matter. 

He could but that is a band aid and not necessarily the best thing to do for DHS. 

Funding TSA is not a band-aid.   It is a sensible thing to do long term.   Indeed, they and other critical services should NEVER be used as leverage for political purposes.   Trump can end this situation right now by funding TSA instead of stupidly deploying ICE and creating a bigger problem.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.29  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.27    8 months ago
It's not Trump problem ...

Again, again, again, I am saying that Trump's solution of deploying ICE is stupid and that instead of doing that, he should use his demonstrated influence to fund TSA.   An opportunity for Trump to actually demonstrate leadership and do something positive for the nation.

Trump making a positive decision like this is far quicker and easier than waiting and hoping our hyper-partisan Congress will do what is right.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1.30  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.15    8 months ago
dems got rid of Noem 

            d29734c8123948ee8b9ff13322a7e262.gif

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.31  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.4    8 months ago

How long do we think it takes somebody to be trained on the metal detecting wand?  

Just what everybody wants - some shit ball, loser, angry ICE agent, after another whirlwind training course, waving you with a wand, poised to beat you to death for looking nervous or having a screw in your bone that keeps setting off the detector.  I’m sure TSA agents would have something to say about how meaningless and simple you think their jobs are.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.32  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.27    8 months ago

Perspective on how easy it would be for Trump to solve this problem.   Step one is for him to get out of the way.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.33  evilone  replied to  goose is back @2.1.26    8 months ago
I know, so showing an ID to vote isn't a big deal!

I am already required to do that. The twelve states that don't didn't have enough impact on the electoral college to stop Trump from becoming the asshole in the big chair so what do you think compelling them (illegally) to do so would accomplish?

Showing you are a US Citizen to register to vote isn't a big deal either, is it? 

I still don't understand why that's a big deal. Registering to vote is not voting. The Constitution makes clear states regulate how they conduct their voting. If the TDS MAGA crowd are sad they can already see how badly they stand to lose in the next election, perhaps some introspection is in order?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.34  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.28    8 months ago
Just doing everything you can to ignore that the PotUS can influence Congress  

Just ignoring where I said Trump could do just that.

Of course you view this in partisan terms (blame the Ds) rather than what is best for this nation.

Who voted no to fund DHS and continues to vote no to fund DHS?  Who is  attempting to make this a Trump issue because he will not agree with the dems?

Congress has the ability to just fund the TSA and deal with the rest of the bill as a distinct matter. 

Why should they?  Just to shut up the dems and show that playing political games is the way to get things done in Washington?

Funding TSA is not a band-aid.   It is a sensible thing to do long term. 

The sensible thing to do would be what is normally done, fund DHS.  Issues the dems have with ICE (many of them their own doing) should have nothing to do with funding DHS.

 Indeed, they and other critical services should NEVER be used as leverage for political purposes.   

Yet here we are.  We should not send the message that this is the way to get your way.

Trump can end this situation right now by funding TSA instead of stupidly deploying ICE and creating a bigger problem.

Trump could also stop any difference the parties have just by agreeing with everything the dems say.  Great way to promote compromise.  Deploying ICE may help the lines but will not help TSA employees

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.35  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.29    8 months ago
Again, again, again

It's not Trump's problem, what have the Democrats offered?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.36  Jack_TX  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.31    8 months ago

So.... two hours?  Three?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.37  Split Personality  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.34    8 months ago
Who voted no to fund DHS and continues to vote no to fund DHS?

Where is the $$ from the Big Beautiful Bill?

The "big, beautiful bill"   signed into law   by President Trump last week will allow him to dramatically expand his immigration crackdown, giving Immigration and Customs Enforcement an unprecedented pool of funding to bolster its efforts to arrest and deport immigrants living in the U.S. illegally.

The money allocated by the law amounts to the largest infusion of funds Congress has given the federal government for immigration enforcement, at a time when the Trump administration has vowed to oversee a deportation campaign of unprecedented proportions.

Overall, the Republican-led Congress set aside roughly $170 billion for immigration enforcement and border security efforts through the legislation, including $75 billion in extra funding for ICE, making it by far the highest-funded law enforcement agency in the federal government.

Trump's "big, beautiful bill" gives ICE unprecedented funds to ramp up mass deportation campaign - CBS News 07/25/2025

Supposedly ICE doesn't need the money. Dems want to fund DHS without including more for ICE.

Simple.

Now Trump nixes a Senate compromise and ties the TSA funding to the SAVE Act, so now it's Trumps fault.

But argue on.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.38  Split Personality  replied to  evilone @2.1.33    8 months ago
The Constitution makes clear states regulate how they conduct their voting.

Amen.  All these snowflakes want is an advantage without a Constitutional Amendment.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.39  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.12    8 months ago
Entirely irrelevant questions.

I'm sure you'd like pretend that. 

So you're trying to comment authoritatively on people you haven't seen in action in....years?  If you had seen them, you would understand how utterly ridiculous your entire argument is.

You are trying to judge the training required of a TSA agent by observing the interactions as a mere passenger. 

I'm also sure you'd like to pretend that. 

TSA is a massive organization comprised of employees with multiple levels of skills.  SOME of what those people do is menial, tedious, repetitive work. The idea that it takes more than a few hours to instruct a trained LEO from another branch how do handle elementary level responsibilities is completely preposterous.

TSA agents go through about 2 weeks of training for a $40k/yr job.  It's a thankless job, but it's not rocket science.

ICE agents can check IDs.  They can direct people to different lines.  They can funnel people through metal detectors.  They can search people.  They can handle the sniffer dogs.  They can carry plastic bins from the end of the conveyor belt back to the beginning.  They can put your golf clubs or guitar on a cart and roll them over to the large bag screening station.  

They can do all sorts of things TSA agents have been doing..... the things those of us who fly have seen them do.

I made the point that ICE agents (at least those properly trained) have entirely different methods and objectives than TSA. 

You specifically said "temperament."  You attempted to claim that ICE agents are somehow inherently too mean and nasty to be unleashed on people walking through metal detectors.   Is that not what you meant? 

trolling

Translated "disagreed with TiG's utterly indefensible position".

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.40  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.39    8 months ago
So you're trying to comment authoritatively on people you haven't seen in action in....years? 

Are you claiming that I have not observed TSA personnel in years?   Where do you get this crap?   

It's a thankless job, but it's not rocket science.

No it is not rocket science.   And importantly, I never even suggested that it was.   I stated that these agents go through weeks of training.   That was in response to your cynical | naive | .... claim that ICE could just step in and perform their duties (implying a few hours of training).   You of course exaggerate.

ICE agents can ...

What you described is basic crowd control.   That is what I suggested ICE could do:

TiG@2.1.8 ☞ The best outcome would be if the ICE workforce focused on crowd control and not try to instantly become TSA personnel.   If this stupid move by Trump continues over time, then it makes sense to have ICE workers be vetted and trained in an accelerated fashion so that they can assume some of the low-level TSA positions.

You are just arguing for the sake of argument.

Is that not what you meant? 

The key factor I had in mind is dealing with tired, frustrated, angry passengers.   Dealing with passengers is fundamentally different from dealing with illegals.   ICE primarily applies force.   TSA primarily applies reasoned deescalation.   These are fundamentally different roles and fundamentally different protocols and training.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.41  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.35    8 months ago
It's not Trump's problem, what have the Democrats offered?

You just refuse to accept the reality that Trump is playing political games and could solve this problem just by letting Congress do its job:

A Republican senator revealed this week that President   Donald Trump   killed a bipartisan compromise to get the presently   unpaid Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers   stationed at the nation’s airports “paid by the end of the week.”

“As is his right, he said no. No deals with the Democrats,” Louisiana Sen.   John Kennedy   said   on Fox News on Monday, March 23. “So we’re back to square one.”

“It would have worked. We could have had TSA paid by the end of the week, but the president said no deals,” Kennedy added.

Now listen to Trump himself:

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.42  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.41    8 months ago
“As is his right, he said no. No deals with the Democrats,”

But I'm sure that Republicans will remember this next time there is a Democrat President in the white house and is claiming the Republicans aren't doing their job and it's their fault if they don't just sign whatever he wants them to sign with no deals in any legislation. Whatever the Democrat President wants he should get it, just like they think their President should get whatever he wants because he's the President and won the last election, right? /s

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.43  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.36    8 months ago

Training and experience are not interchangeable.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.44  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.38    8 months ago

I’m all for the concept of states right as written in our constitution.    I just doubt the folks who wrote it envisioned any American could ever be dim enough to not support proving one’s bona fides in order to cast a vote

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.45  Right Down the Center  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.37    8 months ago
Where is the $$ from the Big Beautiful Bill?

Still there.  Who voted no to fund DHS and continues to vote no to fund DHS?

Supposedly ICE doesn't need the money. 

Supposedly that is not the case

Dems want to fund DHS without including more for ICE.

That goes along nicely with their open border policies

Simple.

It is.  Fund DHS

Now Trump nixes a Senate compromise and ties the TSA funding to the SAVE Act, so now it's Trumps fault.

What compromise is that?  Oh, the one where the rep got rid of Noem and brought in someone to reform how  ICE runs.  What is the dem part of the compromise? 

But argue on.

Just stating facts.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.46  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.41    8 months ago

It's simple, can the Democrats vote and reopen the Government? Yes or No

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.47  Jack_TX  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.43    8 months ago
Training and experience are not interchangeable.

People doing the jobs is better than no people doing the jobs.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.48  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.47    8 months ago

LOL!

Ok...next time you need a surgical procedure let the nurse do it

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.49  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.40    8 months ago
Are you claiming that I have not observed TSA personnel in years?

I'm pointing out that you evaded a very simple question in order to avoid having to face any sort of common sense assessment of the issue.

That was in response to your cynical | naive | .... claim that ICE could just step in and perform their duties (implying a few hours of training).   You of course exaggerate.

No, you simply don't read carefully.  I implied and I believe that ICE agents can step in and do SOME of those duties.   Because they obviously can.  

What you described is basic crowd control.   That is what I suggested ICE could do:

And yet you have continued to argue against the idea.  "Untrained" and "wrong temperament", I think you said.  Hmmmm.

Well, we've just agreed that ICE agents could take over the work of the majority of TSA employees at any standard airport checkpoint.

Dealing with passengers is fundamentally different from dealing with illegals. 

Maybe the passengers will behave better.  That would not be a bad thing.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.50  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.48    8 months ago
LOL! Ok...next time you need a surgical procedure let the nurse do it

I would much rather have a nurse that a $40k yr "doctor" with 2 weeks training.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.51  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.48    8 months ago

you mean the janitor ...

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.52  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.41    8 months ago
You just refuse to accept the reality that Trump is playing political games and could solve this problem just by letting Congress do its job:

Just to be clear, are you suggesting if Trump was taken out of the equation completely Congress would have come to a problem solution?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.53  Right Down the Center  replied to  goose is back @2.1.46    8 months ago
It's simple, can the Democrats vote and reopen the Government? Yes or No

Better yet if they did what they should have the Government never would have closed.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.54  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.49    8 months ago
Maybe the passengers will behave better. 

And maybe others in the airport won't get in their face, scream and try to stop them as they try to give water to people and help direct traffic.

Or maybe some will.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.55  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @2.1.51    8 months ago

way better answer

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.56  goose is back  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.48    8 months ago
next time you need a surgical procedure let the nurse do it

If you don't want to wait in crazy long lines for TSA next time, vote Republican. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.57  goose is back  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.49    8 months ago
And yet you have continued to argue against the idea.  "Untrained" and "wrong temperament",

The ICE agents are probably really nice guys when they don't have fuck heads blowing whistles in their ears, throwing frozen water bottles, spitting on them, cussing them out, wanting to fight all the time, for them to be able to do their jobs is a miracle to begin with. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.58  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.49    8 months ago
I'm pointing out that you evaded a very simple question in order to avoid having to face any sort of common sense assessment of the issue.

You claim that it is easy for ICE to come in and do the jobs of the TSA by implying their jobs are simplistic.   You offer observation from the perspective of a traveler in contrast to my note that TSA employees undergo weeks of training to do their jobs.   And after the training, they then do the job for months to years, gaining experience.   Your 'common sense assessment' is naive and cynical.   It ignores facts and even basic reason.

I implied and I believe that ICE agents can step in and do SOME of those duties.  

I stated that ICE could come in and deal with crowd control.   They can also empty the trash, and other duties that do not require much training or experience.   They are not going to just step in and perform core duties of TSA agents.   Attempt to recognize that the problem is the lack of TSA personnel.   There are not enough TSA agents to man the stations and thus airports are running with reduced capacity (everyone funneled into a few lines).   For ICE to help in this, they would need to be able to serve as substitutes for TSA personnel.   That means they would have to perform the job functions.  Job functions that require weeks of training and far more than weeks of experience.

And yet you have continued to argue against the idea. 

A blatant lie.   I am arguing the above ⇡, not that ICE could not help with crowd control.

Maybe the passengers will behave better.  

What drives you to try to defend Trump's stupid decisions?   Just amazing that anyone would stoop to such levels of dishonesty just to try to defend yet another stupid move by Trump.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.59  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.47    8 months ago
People doing the jobs is better than no people doing the jobs.

They have to be able to do the job.   The situation would be different if ICE was called in to control crowds, pick up trash, etc.   That would be helpful.   But what is missing are trained/experienced TSA personnel and ICE agents are simply NOT that.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.60  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.52    8 months ago
Just to be clear, are you suggesting if Trump was taken out of the equation completely Congress would have come to a problem solution?

Yes.   Senator Kennedy (R) said as much.   Did you watch the video?   I offered it to give people like you a clear understanding of what is taking place.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.61  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.56    8 months ago
If you don't want to wait in crazy long lines for TSA next time, vote Republican. 

Trump is the key person holding this up.    You ignored @2.1.41 to maintain confirmation bias.

Trump has been telling the GOP to not cut any deals with the Ds.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.62  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.54    8 months ago

There was a story a couple of days ago where an illegal was arrested with her 9 year old daughter with her. This incident happened before ICE was deployed to any airport. During the arrest, where the woman tried to escape, an AWFL got into ICEs faces and demanded badge numbers and names.

This happened before ICE was deployed to assist with TSA. 

Some leftists just can't help but to make trouble.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.63  Split Personality  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.44    8 months ago
proving one’s bona fides in order to cast a vote

proving it to whom??

The clerk/volunteer at the polling place?  The Sargeant at Arms?

I had to do this circle jerk every time a PCS took us to a different State. line up with your birth certificates, medical records and prior states drivers licences

to go to public school, get a new drivers license, switch insurances, get base housing or not.

I am certain that if the great state of Texas needed to, it can find the pictures from my colonoscopy on line or at Medicare HQ... along with marriage, divorce and death certificates at Social Security.

Do we need to carry a personal thumb drive or get bar coded?

The whole concept is like trying to kill gnats with an 8lb sledge hammer.......it does more harm and zero improvement.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.64  Split Personality  replied to  goose is back @2.1.56    8 months ago
If you don't want to wait in crazy long lines for TSA next time, vote Republican. 

If you don't want to wait in crazy long lines for TSA next time sign up for TSA precheck and walk right through.

TSA PreCheck® | Transportation Security Administration

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.65  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @2.1.62    8 months ago

There was a story a couple of days ago where a white officer pulled over a nice car in a nice neighborhood for allegedly driving 30mph in a 35 mph zone.

He demanded that the older black female put the window down alle the way when she did not he responded with "you people": comments, took her license and registration back to the patrol car, came back with a citation for obstructing traffic.  She snatched the papers from his hand and she said " See you in 1019 later today. I will be in touch. "

He said WTF and walked to the back of her car and used his flashlight to break her tail light. 

She was livid and jumped out of her car yelling "how dare you?"

he said "why are you dressed like that?"

She said "I'm the Judge in Court room 1019.

He immediately says "well why didn't you just identify yourself."?

He was suspended and ordered to make restitution

Some racists just can't help but to make trouble.

Shit happens.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.66  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.65    8 months ago
Some racists just can't help but to make trouble.

Probably applied to ICE within 24 hours.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.67  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.65    8 months ago

Not sure how this has anything to do with what I posted and the subject matter at hand....however....do you have video of this encounter, because we have been told here several times...if you don't have proof, it never happened. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.68  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.65    8 months ago

And before you ask for proof of what I posted...here ya go

ICE agents restrain crying woman and child at SFO, footage shows

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.69  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @2.1.67    8 months ago
And maybe others in the airport won't get in their face, scream and try to stop them as they try to give water to people and help direct traffic. Or maybe some will.

What you posted was not ICE agents handing out water or directing traffic was it?

For some inexplicable reason you posted  the opposite.

ICE agents restrain crying woman and child at SFO, footage shows

Two unidentified men detaining a woman at the airport and several people asking for ID, badges, some hint that they are actually on the job.

and doing a pretty poor job of it to boot.

A poor deflection from the prior conversation.

Just my opinion, of course.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.70  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.58    8 months ago
You claim that it is easy for ICE to come in and do the jobs of the TSA by implying their jobs are simplistic.

No.  I have said there are SOME things they can do.  

   You offer observation from the perspective of a traveler in contrast to my note that TSA employees undergo weeks of training to do their jobs.

Many of the subjects covered in that training are the ones you've already said ICE agents can do.

They are not going to just step in and perform core duties of TSA agents.

Let's take a look.  From TSA.gov  

TSO Daily Responsibilities

  • Operating various screening equipment and technology to identify dangerous objects in baggage, cargo and/or on passengers, and preventing those objects from being transported onto aircraft
  • Performing searches and screening, which may include physical interaction with passengers (e.g., pat downs, property searches) conducting bag searches and lifting/carrying bags, bins and property weighing up to 50lbs.
  • Controlling terminal entry and exit points
  • Interacting with the public, giving directions and responding to inquiries
  • Retaining and implementing knowledge of all applicable Standard Operating Procedures

SSA Daily Responsibilities

  • Aid in the monitoring and flow of individuals through security check lane(s) to reduce wait times, adjusting passenger traffic as neccessary
  • Move checked baggage to and from x-ray conveyer systems during screening process
  • Ensure security check points are properly supplied with an appropriate supply of bins and organized to ensure a smooth flow of passenger traffic for screening operations
  • Provide information and assistance to passengers divesting items into storage bins and moving and restocking bins as needed
  • Complete logs, forms and other paperwork applicable to assigned duties
  • Perform other job-related duties as assigned, to include visitor escort, supply requisition and stocking, telephone support and area cleaning

Hmmm.... So it looks like 8 of these 10 responsibilities can be handled easily by an ICE agent..... or a Chick fil a employee.... or any teenager who has worked at a movie theater.

Attempt to recognize that the problem is the lack of TSA personnel. 

Attempt to realize real life isn't binary and there is more than one way to solve most problems.

That means they would have to perform the job functions.  Job functions that require weeks of training and far more than weeks of experience.

Riiiight.  Because it takes weeks to learn how to "Ensure security check points are properly supplied with an appropriate supply of bins".  Weeks, I tell you... weeks.

What drives you to try to defend Trump's stupid decisions?   Just amazing that anyone would stoop to such levels of dishonesty just to try to defend yet another stupid move by Trump.

The saddest part about all of this is how you seem to be totally oblivious to exactly how unhinged your arguments have become.  

  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.71  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.59    8 months ago
They have to be able to do the job.

You've already lost that argument spectacularly.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.72  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.71    8 months ago

Ironic.   You resort to the childish and dishonest declaration of victory.   A tacit admission that you cannot rebut the fact that TSA personnel undergo weeks of training and have months and years of on the job experience that will not magically manifest in ICE agents.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.73  Jack_TX  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.72    8 months ago
You resort to the childish and dishonest declaration of victory.

The childish part is you continuing to disagree with your own comments and stubbornly refusing to acknowledge the most obvious facts.

You have admitted on multiple occasions that ICE can handle what you call "crowd control".  Turns out about 70% of the average TSA agent's job is crowd control.

A tacit admission that you cannot rebut the fact that TSA personnel undergo weeks of training 

You're still trying desperately to pretend that somehow matters.  I can only assume that's because you have nothing left to cling to if that goes, and then you might have to strike this off your "reasons I hate Trump" list.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.1.74  GregTx  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.73    8 months ago

Doubtful...

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.75  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.72    8 months ago
TSA personnel undergo weeks of training

For about 25% of their job.  The rest they can learn in a half a day.  That 75% is what ICE  can easily do.  And they don't need "months and years of on the job experience" to do it 

Not the best scenario (which would  be to fund DHS) but an outside the box temporary fix for airport lines (it does nothing for TSA agents) until both sides stop their mud slinging and come to a long term solution.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.76  TᵢG  replied to  Jack_TX @2.1.73    8 months ago
The childish part is you continuing to disagree with your own comments ...

If you think I have contradicted myself then show it.   Making false, unsubstantiated claims is just more dishonesty from you.  

You have admitted on multiple occasions that ICE can handle what you call "crowd control".  Turns out about 70% of the average TSA agent's job is crowd control.

I did not admit it, I stated it upfront.   And where do you get this nonsense that 70% of their job is crowd control?   Lying and making shit up is not an argument.

You're still trying desperately to pretend that somehow matters.

Training and experience matters.   Imagine having to claim otherwise because your feeble argument depends upon this nonsense.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.77  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.75    8 months ago
For about 25% of their job.  The rest they can learn in a half a day. 

Making claims without factual support is meaningless.   Back this up.

Further, demonstrate how one can quickly train an ICE agent to replace a TSA agent.   After all, many jobs have parts that are easy (e.g. a reporter spends a lot of time dictating, typing, fact-checking, etc.)   So do you think you can replace that reporter with someone who knows how to type, dictate, fact-check but does not know how to write (especially write like a professional journalist)?

Not the best scenario ...

Clearly not.   It is stupidity.

The solution that I have stated repeatedly is for Trump to pay the TSA agents.   He could have done that by just letting Congress come to its agreement (as Senator Kennedy noted) or by just issuing an EO (as he finally announced he would do).

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.78  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.77    8 months ago
The solution that I have stated repeatedly is for Trump to pay the TSA agents.

You mean for the Democrats to stop their tantrum and end the shutdown.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.79  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.78    8 months ago

The platitude ' You mean ... ' typically is —and is the case here— followed by a misrepresentation rather than a honest, sound rebuttal.

No, Jeremy, I meant for Trump to either get out of the way (stop blocking Congress from working out a way to pay TSA) or to take direct action himself.

Turns out, he announced that he will take direct action.   So why did he let the TSA personnel suffer, drive them to seek other employment, and cause so much pain for the American people when he obviously could have addressed this upfront?

Trump Makes Major Announcement

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.80  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.79    8 months ago
The platitude ' You mean ... ' typically is —and is the case here— followed by a misrepresentation rather than a honest, sound rebuttal.

I'd agree but then we'd both be wrong.  

No, Jeremy, I meant for Trump to either get out of the way (stop blocking Congress from working out a way to pay TSA) or to take direct action himself.

Since Congress (specifically Democrats) are the problem you may want to reconsider your blathering.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.81  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.80    8 months ago

Your 'rebuttal' is a cliche.

You ignored the facts presented and merely claim partisan bullshit.

Trump could have stopped this on day one.   He chose to not do so!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.82  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.81    8 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.83  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.82    8 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.84  bugsy  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.69    8 months ago
What you posted was not ICE agents handing out water or directing traffic was it?

Well that's good because I never made such a claim...did I?

"For some inexplicable reason you posted  the opposite."

No, I posted proof of my initial claim 2.1.62.

"Two unidentified men"

Yea...just random dudes rolling up on someone to arrest them for being in the country illegally. I guess anybody can do that now, huh?

"people asking for ID, badges,"

Things they need to not get involved with. 

"A poor deflection from the prior conversation."

No, right on target with 2.1.62

"ust my opinion"

Noted

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.85  Split Personality  replied to  bugsy @2.1.84    8 months ago
Well that's good because I never made such a claim...did I?

That's the comment from RDC you responded to.

Your example of ICE behavior was not ICE agents handing out water or directing traffic.

The rest is just a knee jerk reaction to automatically disagree 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.86  goose is back  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.64    8 months ago

   sign up for TSA precheck and walk right through.

Wait............ I thought Democrats where against having to prove you were a U S. Citizen !

Required Documents for TSA PreCheck® Application

U.S. Citizens, U.S. Nationals, or Lawful Permanent Residents

You must provide an original or certified copy* of identity/citizenship status documentation during the application process and the names on all documents must match exactly with the name provided on the application. If you have legally changed your name, you must provide an original or certified name change document (such as marriage certificates and divorce decrees) in addition to the required documentation. Required Documents for TSA PreCheck® Application | Transportation Security Administration

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.87  bugsy  replied to  goose is back @2.1.86    8 months ago
I thought Democrats where against having to prove you were a U S. Citizen !

ONLY to vote

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.1.88  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.61    8 months ago
rump is the key person holding this up. 

Well.....how about that Trump screwed the Democrats again and funded TSA by Executive Order 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.89  Split Personality  replied to  goose is back @2.1.88    8 months ago

Only Congress can disperse funds, so the EO would be Unconstitutional if it got that far.

It did spur the Senate to pass what the Dems asked for all along, unanimously, last night.

Now it' s up to the knuckleheads in the House to pass or fuck up.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.90  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.89    8 months ago

In announcing the EO, the White House admits that there is no funding crisis at DHS and that they can pay the TSA people.

(1) Live updates: Trump signs order to pay TSA agents after House rejects DHS funding bill | AP News

If DHS has the extra funding to keep paying ICE and BPC officers, then they can damn well pay everyone else under the DHS umbrella.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.91  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @2.1.88    8 months ago
Well.....how about that Trump screwed the Democrats again and funded TSA by Executive Order 

A perfect example of blind partisanship.

You do not care about solving the problem, just "screwing" the Ds.   

You have argued that Trump could NOT act to fix this problem yet Trump just proved that he could ... and that he could have done so on day one.

No TSA employees needed to go without pay, no passengers needed their plans screwed up by outrageous security delays.   All of this was unnecessary but Trump not only chose to hold TSA and passengers hostage for political purposes, he even actively tried to prevent Congress from making a deal that would fund TSA.

But, no, you only care about dishonestly spinning this into an attack on Ds.   

Blind partisanship is disgusting.   

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.92  TᵢG  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.89    8 months ago

Trump does not care about the law or the CotUS.

And the key here is that Trump could have issued the EO on day one.   Illegal or not, that is nothing new for Trump.   And I personally see no reason why the Executive branch could not just pay TSA.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.1.93  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.91    8 months ago
No TSA employees needed to go without pay, no passengers needed their plans screwed up by outrageous security delays. All of this was unnecessary..

Apparently, Democrats disagree...

Blind partisanship is disgusting.

Agreed 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.94  TᵢG  replied to  GregTx @2.1.93    8 months ago

Again with the partisan crap.

Do you not care about the consequences to the American people?

Trump could have prevented this but chose instead to use TSA and airline passengers as leverage for political purposes.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.1.95  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.94    8 months ago

Partisan? Remind me again where the last few shutdowns originated...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.96  TᵢG  replied to  GregTx @2.1.95    8 months ago

Yes, absolutely 100% partisan.

Instead of focusing on the unnecessary harm caused by not paying TSA employees and all the consequences thereof, you focus on blaming the Ds.

Note the both Ds and Rs did indeed have a solution but Trump nixed it.

Trump could have solved this problem on day one.

Focus on the facts, objectively, instead of pointless partisan crap.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.1.97  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.96    8 months ago
Instead of focusing on the unnecessary harm caused by not paying TSA employees and all the consequences thereof, you focus on blaming the Ds.
Remind me again where the last few shutdowns originated
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.98  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.96    8 months ago
absolutely 100% partisan.

Partisan is blaming the Republican  President because a minority of Democratic Senators are holding Americans hostage and risking  their security by filibustering bills with majority support to fund DHS. 

Trump could have solved this problem on day one.

Why he should reward partisan terrorists taking hostages?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.99  Split Personality  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.92    8 months ago

This EO probably won't be challenged because it directs DHS to treat the TSA payroll as  essential, the same way they are paying HSI, and ICE agents.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.100  Split Personality  replied to  GregTx @2.1.95    8 months ago
Partisan? Remind me again where the last few shutdowns originated...

Typically one would expect the party not controlling the WH would be blamed for any impasse in funding appropriations.

But if you are implying that the majority would be caused by the Dems, that just isn't the common belief.

The most significant historical shutdowns include  the first shutdown  under  Donald Trump's second presidency , which began on October 1, 2025, and lasted for 43 days; [ 4 ]  the  35-day shutdown of 2018–2019  during  President Trump's first presidency , over  expanding barriers on the U.S.–Mexico border ; [ 5 ]  the  current shutdown  of the  Department of Homeland Security  also under Donald Trump's second presidency, which began on February 14, 2026 and has continued for 41 days so far; the  21-day shutdown of 1995–1996  during the  Bill Clinton administration , over opposition to major spending cuts; and the  16-day shutdown in 2013  during the  Barack Obama administration , over implementation of the  Affordable Care Act . The other seven shutdowns lasted five or fewer days 320
Government shutdowns in the United States - Wikipedia

2026 will probably start out as the Dems and end up as the GOP.

The EO directs DHS to use discretionary funds used to pay ICE agents to also pay the TSA people, which could have been the case without causing the TSA to suffer and lose 480 agents.

Trump doesn't care.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.101  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.98    8 months ago

Trump used the TSA (and travelers) as political leverage.   He could have paid TSA and avoided this pain;  he could have NOT blocked Congress from reaching an agreement to pay TSA.   

There is no defending this.   Deal with political opposition without fucking with the American people.

I have not been stating that this is all the Rs fault nor have I placed all the blame on the Ds.   What I have been doing is noting that Trump was holding the Rs back and, worse, he could have addressed this issue himself (apparently).   That is not partisan, that is objective reasoning.

You, et. al., on the other hand frame this (and pretty much every issue) in partisan terms.   Always the Ds fault.   How you cannot recognize the partisan bias in that is frankly not believable.

Why do you constantly defend Trump no matter what?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.102  bugsy  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.98    8 months ago
Trump could have solved this problem on day one.

And if he did, leftists would scream that he is authoritarian and going over Congress.

Now they want him to do just that.

Democrats need to get their poutrages in sync. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.103  bugsy  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.98    8 months ago

I wonder how all the liberal white folks feel about Trump not shutting down their "No Kings" whine fest today.

You would think a dictator would not allow such an event. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.104  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @2.1.102    8 months ago

Your posts are partisan fantasies.   You created a ridiculous boogeyman and then complain about what this boogeyman would do.

In doing so, you ignore reality.

Trump intentionally used TSA and thus airline passengers as pawns for leverage.   He blocked a compromise from Congress (that means both Ds and Rs) to fund TSA and now it seems he could have unilaterally funded TSA all alone.

This is the guy you continue to support and defend by constantly, absurdly recasting everything into a partisan whine.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.105  Sean Treacy  replied to  bugsy @2.1.103    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.106  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.105    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.107  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.101    8 months ago

Deal with political opposition without fucking with the American people.

Amazing you can direct that at the President and not a minority of partisan Senators using the filibuster to prevent Congress from passing legislation with majority support. Really amazing.

, et. al., on the other hand frame this (and pretty much every issue) in partisan terms. Always the Ds fault. How you cannot recognize the partisan bias in that is frankly not believable.

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.108  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.107    8 months ago
Amazing you can direct that at the President and not a minority of partisan Senators using the filibuster to prevent Congress from passing legislation with majority support.  Really amazing. 

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif A tactic taught to them by Mitch McConnell during the Obama years. Hilarious that Republicans are whining about that now.

As Senate Minority Leader during the Obama administration, Mitch McConnell utilized the filibuster extensively to block Democratic legislation and nominees, leading to a record-breaking number of cloture votes (over 400+ between 2007–2013) to force a 60-vote threshold .

Mitch McConnell broke Congress and gave us an all-powerful Supreme Court | Vox

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.109  bugsy  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.107    8 months ago

Most Liberals before the democratic shutdown:

"Trump can't bypass Congress and do what he wants"

Most liberals 40 something days into the democratic shutdown:

"Reeeeeeeee....Trump should have bypassed Congress to pay TSA agents

I can assure you these same liberals, in private, are pissed Trump signed the EO to pay TSA. They would rather have Americans suffer in 3-4 hour waits in airports. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.110  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.63    8 months ago

[✘] Proving voter bona fides is a bedrock principle of a valid and effective election process. Intimating otherwise is nonsensical. Without it elections would be meaningless. Without it I could perhaps organize bus loads of people, travel to a loony left Michigan districts like Ann Arbor or Detroit, flood the ballot box with conservative votes and upset their little liberal apple cart down there in left wing clusterfuckery land.

Proof validated by the mechanism established by the local jurisdiction is an absolute minimum. The jurisdiction bestowed with the honor and privilege of the public trust, to honestly administrate any election of the people, for the people and by the people is responsible. Public trust. Key words here. Penalties for not discharging these duties honestly are probably not harsh enough.

Whining about hurdles required to verify voter bona fides is weak sauce related to insuring the process of effective elections. As far as the military is concerned they have all the data required to complete this process for any service member. Including getting to appropriate ballot to the appropriate service member wherever they are. They just don’t do it. Which has nothing to do with proving who that service member is or isn’t. Pretty sure Uncle Sam has that covered though.

Yeah, it was a pain in the ass while serving, which isn’t right but again that has nothing to do with proving voter bona fides.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.111  Sparty On  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.83    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.112  Sparty On  replied to  bugsy @2.1.103    8 months ago

Heads would roll, people would be hanged from cranes, dogs would be living with cats … etc, etc

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.113  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.110    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.114  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.111    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.115  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.110    8 months ago

Maybe you will take a stab at the answer that no MAGA has been able to give for over 5 years, including Trump -  what is your evidence that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump?  Not pointless bullshit opinion, evidence.  I think 5 1/2 years is enough time to gather that into a coherent factual argument. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.116  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.115    8 months ago

Maybe you should stop trying to label everyone and explain what your problem is with proving voter bona fides.    A question asked many times, of many people and I have yet to get a reasonable “coherent” answer here from my friends on the left.

Hint: it has nothing to do with your attempted derailment using the 2020 election, pro or con.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.117  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.116    8 months ago

Donald Trump was all for mail in voting until it dawned on him that it wasn't helping him, then he changed to claiming it was being used to "cheat" him. 

There is nothing wrong, at all, with using signatures to verify voter eligibility. 

On December 14, 2020, Secretary Raffensperger announced a signature match audit in Cobb County following credible allegations that the process was not followed in the June primaries. The Secretary of State’s Office partnered with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) to conduct the audit. Of the 150,431 absentee ballots received by Cobb County elections officials during the November elections, the audit “reviewed 15,118 ABM ballot oath envelopes from randomly selected boxes,” or around 10% of the total. The sample size was originally chosen to meet the 99% confidence threshold.

The audit found “no fraudulent absentee ballots” with a 99% confidence threshold. The audit found that only two ballots should have been identified by Cobb County Elections Officials for cure notification that weren’t. In one case, the ballot was “mistakenly signed by the elector’s spouse,” and in the other, the voter “reported signing the front of the envelope only.” In both cases, the identified voters filled out the ballots themselves.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.118  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.117    8 months ago
There is nothing wrong, at all, with using signatures to verify voter eligibility. 

Cool, please explain how that works to us unwashed masses.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.119  cjcold  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.79    8 months ago

Trump has a history of destroying every business he has  ever run due to corruption and mismanagement. Now he is running America into the ground as well.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.120  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.117    8 months ago

‘Donald Trump was all for mail in voting until it dawned on him that it wasn't helping him, then he changed to claiming it was being used to "cheat" him’

And he still is ‘t. What you fail to post is that he is against mass mailings to every residence in tje city/county, no matter if the addressee still lives there or is even still alive. 
That leaves way too many openings for people to cheat.

What you also failed to post is that he voted by mail in the recent Florida special election held in the county MarA Largo is in.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.121  bugsy  replied to  cjcold @2.1.119    8 months ago

‘Now he is running America into the ground as well’

Would you say the same if Trump was a D, because he was for the most of his life…..until he finally found sanity

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.122  TᵢG  replied to  cjcold @2.1.119    8 months ago

Tru dat.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.123  Sparty On  replied to  bugsy @2.1.121    8 months ago

Nope, not a chance.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.1.124  Sparty On  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.118    8 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.125  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @2.1.121    8 months ago
Would you say the same if Trump was a D, because he was for the most of his life…

Absolutely.  Criticism of Trump is not a function of his current party affiliation.   It does not matter the party of a PotUS who is:

  • unpresidential
  • unfit
  • extremely vindictive
  • a psychopath
  • a pathological liar
  • incompetent
  • irresponsible
  • intentionally ignorant
  • impulsive to an extreme

Especially when this PotUS:

  • tried to steal the 2020 election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement
  • surrounded himself with incompetent sycophants
  • tried to keep classified documents and obstructed their safe return for months
  • engaged in true lawfare, blatantly so, directing the AG (never should be done) to go after select political opponents (e.g. Comey, James, Cook, ...)
  • coerced private businesses (e.g. Perkins Coie LLP) and universities (e.g. Harvard) with threats of denying federal business opportunities/funding
  • overstepped authority and effectively killed USAID, which was congressionally approved, and abruptly, irresponsibly cut life-critical funding worldwide
  • removed watch dogs (e.g. inspectors general, FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter,...) and fired DoJ attorneys, et.al. who worked on his indictments
  • unilaterally destroyed the East Wing
  • accepts outrageously expensive gifts such as the Qatar jet (which will now cost at least $400 million in taxpayer dollars to prepare)
  • renamed the Kennedy center to arrogantly put his own name as top billing
  • abused the use of the National guard to deploy to cities as a political show
  • more than doubled ICE personnel with demonstrably poorly vetted, poorly trained individuals, and then unleashed them en masse into communities
  • abuse of tariff power which pointlessly damaged USA reputation worldwide and triggered trading partners to strategically establish trade alternatives other than the USA
  • pullback from WHO, UN, UNFCCC, etc. reducing the USA's international leadership
  • anti climate change initiatives (as if trying to damage the environment further)
  • blatant attempt to steal the 2026 midterms by coercing states to gerrymander for political (not census) reasons
  • failed miserably on his campaign promise to lower prices
  • failed miserably on his campaign promise to end the Ukraine war
  • is a national embarrassment given he is the voice, face, and hand of the USA, yet publicly trolls our allies (in particular, Canada) and whines about not being awarded the Peace prize and then vindictively threatens not to be motivated for peace
  • has substantially increased both deficit spending and the national debt (in direct opposition of his promises)
  • is actively trying to steal the 2026 midterms
  • unilaterally put the USA into an illegal war with Iran with no clear objective (best we can tell) and no exit plan

What is remarkable (and disgusting) is that some are so cultishly tied to Trump that they refuse to open their eyes.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.126  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.107    8 months ago

My posting history is consistent.   I do not frame my arguments in partisan terms (e.g. the left, the right, the Ds, the Rs, …) but rather in terms of real events using supportable facts and logic.

Trump is the predominant problem.   He is fucking things up left and right and is constantly top news.    Thus my comments are predominantly about Trump.   And that would be the case no matter what party he was affiliated with.

Your comments consistently defend Trump.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1.127  Split Personality  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.110    8 months ago

Gee I wonder what was deleted, something classy I expect?

My DNA, dental records, fingerprints, driving history, medical history and travel records within and without CONUS are a matter of record at the FBI, CIA, SSN, IRS, DOD, SEC, Customs and probably a few other departments I am not aware of. 

Medicare has my colon polyps in person and on film.

I have provided proof of citizenship at every time requested by any entity legally required, to prove to my state of residency that I have the privilege to vote in any election they organize through the power of the US Constitution.

The Federal government can only request homogeny from the twelve or so states that don't have photo ID requirements or require birth certificates etc.

Want to change it? 

Then someone needs to pass an Amendment to the Constitution, period. Even the 38 states who have the requirements aren't set to relinquish power to the Fed.

The SAVE ACT is an illegal end run around the Constitution. period, if passed it will be challenged all the way to SCOTUS.

The SAVE ACT is the result of the political posturing of one man with an ego larger than the planet who believes that even his victories weren't large enough for his own ego.

But please let's bray on about it endlessly as if it's some religious test of character and the future of the country sways in the balance.

Prediction   Market   Odds

I think what the draconian measures are referring to, are all people who have to prove a legal name change including divorce papers, marriage licenses, legal name changes etc for every married woman in the country ( a double standard )
Yeah, it was a pain in the ass while serving, 
I'm sorry if that's what you got out of your service or my comments.  
 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.128  devangelical  replied to  goose is back @2.1.56    8 months ago
If you don't want to wait in crazy long lines for TSA next time, vote Republican.

if you want unidentifiable LEO's that are immune from prosecution for violating your constitutional rights, vote republican ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.129  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sparty On @2.1.111    7 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.130  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.107    7 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.131  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1.130    7 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    8 months ago

Actually flight travellers are appreciative of anything which will improve wait time

I know it's hopeless, but could you, for once, cite your source showing that travelers will be appreciative of ICE intervention at airports?  And how ICE agents will improve wait times when they will detain anyone with brown skin during the boarding process?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2    8 months ago

Maybe he took a poll.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.2.1    8 months ago
Maybe he took a poll.

Maybe he pulled the poll out of a dark tender portion of his body.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2    8 months ago
I know it's hopeless, but could you, for once, cite your source showing that travelers will be appreciative of ICE intervention at airports? 

FFS. 

If wait times are less, normal people will be happy.  

You would think even complete lefties would be happy with the number of ICE agents taken off the streets. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.4  Snuffy  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.3    8 months ago

Not if it interferes with their desire to say 'Fuck Trump'. When the only desire is to bitch and complain about everything around the current administration, then nothing will be allowed to get in the way. Especially not common sense.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.5  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.3    8 months ago
You would think even complete lefties would be happy with the number of ICE agents taken off the streets. 

Seriously? 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.2.6  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2    8 months ago

He didn’t say ICE agents he said improved wait times and he’s right.    Most WILL appreciate less wait time.    Even the Trump triggered who lie and say they don’t.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.7  Jack_TX  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.2.5    8 months ago
Seriously? 

I find it increasingly difficult to take these people seriously.

Every ICE agent in an airport is an ICE agent not dragging an illegal immigrant off the street somewhere.

Unless of course you imagine illegals are all busy using their frequent flyer miles shipping champagne in the Centurion lounge.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.8  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.7    8 months ago

ICE has been detaining anyone who speaks Spanish. Have you listened to TSA agents lately? 

I hope things go well, but it's easy to see how things could go south. 

Trump ecouraged ICE to do ICE things at the airports.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.2.9  Jack_TX  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.2.8    8 months ago
ICE has been detaining anyone who speaks Spanish.

Citation? 

Seems mathematically impossible.

Trump ecouraged ICE to do ICE things at the airports.

I've lived in Dallas most of my life.  Illegal aliens are part of the fabric here.

If you were compiling a list of the best places to find illegals, the airport would be one of the last places you'd ever look.  Too much security.  Too much background checking.

Also, they're not actually stupid enough to go somewhere they know is going to be crawling with ICE agents.  They're not like entitled American "activists" who think they can go anywhere with no consequences.  

Trump has given them a great gift.  He has gathered thousands of ICE agents in places illegal immigrants almost never go anyway and announced it publicly.

It's like somebody telling you they're sequestering all the red hat rednecks in Sun Devil Stadium for the next month.  You know exactly where not to go. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.3    8 months ago
If wait times are less, normal people will be happy.

ab6765630000ba8ad64cc7dd94c6dd17767caed4

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.11  Ozzwald  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.6    8 months ago
He didn’t say ICE agents he said improved wait times and he’s right.

You're making a BIG assumption here.  You are assuming that a bunch of untrained ICE agents will speed up the security lines, whereas they may increase the waiting time by demanding citizen ID's from anyone they want to.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2.2.12  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.11    8 months ago
You're making a BIG assumption here

Nah, just using common sense.    Question:

What happens with no one at the TSA check points?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.13  TᵢG  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.11    8 months ago

The key problem here is a lack of systemic thinking.

Trump is throwing bodies at a problem.   He is bringing in people who are trained for one job and having them jump into another job with little or no training.  ICE officers may be able to help with peripheral functions such as crowd control or line management.  They cannot solve the core short-term problem, which is the shortage of trained TSA staff performing specialized aviation-security work.  But much worse, he is merging two entirely different systems.   Anyone who understands system dynamics should recognize that this approach is replete with problems (failure points).   The idea that this will make things better in the short-term is naive wishful thinking.

Instead of this true idiocy, Trump should work with his sycophantic supporters in Congress to fund critical services such as TSA and stop abusing critical services for political leverage.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.14  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Sparty On @2.2.12    8 months ago
What happens with no one at the TSA check points?

They go back to pre 9-11 check in procedures at the expense of the airports and airlines . 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.15  Trout Giggles  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.2.14    8 months ago

I like that idea

What was that again? It's been a while

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.16  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.15    8 months ago
What was that again?

Posting signs asking passengers not to to bring any weapons on board.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.17  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.16    8 months ago

that was all?

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.18  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Jack_TX @2.2.9    8 months ago
ICE has been detaining anyone who speaks Spanish.

Citation? 

Seems mathematically impossible.

You often use exaggerations. You expect your readers to recognize them as such. And then you do not do the same. jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

Trump ecouraged ICE to do ICE things at the airports.
I've lived in Dallas most of my life.  Illegal aliens are part of the fabric here.

Dallas must be a hellhole! Unless of course the presence of all those illegal aliens contributes ot the overall quality of life in Dallas...

If you were compiling a list of the best places to find illegals, the airport would be one of the last places you'd ever look.  Too much security.  Too much background checking.

Also, they're not actually stupid enough to go somewhere they know is going to be crawling with ICE agents.  They're not like entitled American "activists" who think they can go anywhere with no consequences.  

Trump has given them a great gift.  He has gathered thousands of ICE agents in places illegal immigrants almost never go anyway and announced it publicly.

It's like somebody telling you they're sequestering all the red hat rednecks in Sun Devil Stadium for the next month.  You know exactly where not to go. 

I wonder how long before ICE detains a TSA.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.19  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.13    8 months ago
Trump is throwing bodies at a problem

Not at all.

ICE at the airport is not intended to make passengers' lives better. It is intended to demonstrate that Trump can put his thugs anywhere he pleases. That he can threaten Americans anywhere he pleases.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.20  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.17    8 months ago
that was all?

I believe it was in the fine print of your boarding pass as well.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.21  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.20    8 months ago

LOL!

I flew quite a bit before 9/11 because I was stationed in Alaska but that was so long ago.

I really only remember the nightmare after 9/11 when flying

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.2.22  evilone  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.21    8 months ago
I really only remember the nightmare after 9/11 when flying

I remember having families and loved ones waiting at gates to greet travelers. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.23  Trout Giggles  replied to  evilone @2.2.22    8 months ago

I do remember that. I miss those days

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.24  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.23    8 months ago

I remember scoring exotic weed from GI's coming back from vietnam, and fucking with the hare krishners ...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.25  Ozzwald  replied to  devangelical @2.2.24    8 months ago
fucking with the hare krishners

airplane-movie-fight-scene.gif

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.26  devangelical  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.25    8 months ago

f'n 70's thai stick was brutal 1 hit shit. started out at 5¢ per in thailand and by the time it got to the US, $20.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.27  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.13    8 months ago
The key problem here is a lack of systemic thinking.

maga!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.28  TᵢG  replied to  devangelical @2.2.27    8 months ago

Trump.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.2.29  bugsy  replied to  Bob Nelson @2.2.8    8 months ago
ICE has been detaining anyone who speaks Spanish

Such bullshit

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.30  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.28    8 months ago

trump will get it fixed on day 1, ... of his 3rd term ...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    8 months ago

Good stuff...

Somebody doesn't know what an dystopian hellhole is.  I've  walked off airplanes and ships in France and witnessed troops armed to the teeth serving as security.  Shocking as it was to my American eyes, I never thought France was dystopian hellhole for that reason.   I'd suggest a few weeks in any place Marxism has taken root for  a introduction to the term.

Trying to lessen wait times caused by Democrats isn't it. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    8 months ago

The Democrats want to fund TSA

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    8 months ago

The Republicans want to fund DHS

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.1    8 months ago

The Democrats have offered to fund every DHS Branch except ice

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    8 months ago

You mean the one that is already funded for the next three years?  Maybe they should stop with their show to get some more midterm votes and think about those that are not getting paid while they all fight for their sound bites

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.1.4  Split Personality  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.3    8 months ago
You mean the one that is already funded for the next three years?

Thanks for admitting that.

DHS is a sham created by Bush to make up for poor, nonexistent or terrible cooperation between a handful of departments sort of blamed for 911

because many never shared intel or even had incompatible communications equipment.

Here we are 15 years later and TSA, Fema, Coast Guard, Border Patrol and now ICE are all funded separately still.

Dissolve DHS, it hasn't solved anything.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
3.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    8 months ago

Which basically amounts to political extortion.

To quote one of your hero’s:    Elections have consequences.    

Fund all of DHS.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    8 months ago
Somebody doesn't know what an dystopian hellhole is.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTLJr7MxfAzQ_jy4mho37i9yX_xKOxGAglgig&s

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.3  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    8 months ago
I've walked off airplanes and ships in France and witnessed troops armed to the teeth serving as security.

The difference being that these troops have been trained for crowd surveillance. ICE has been trained for... nothing.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.3.1  bugsy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.3    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.3.2  Thomas  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.3    8 months ago
ICE has been trained for... nothing.

Not exactly. They must have had some training in the KKK... Hahahahahah

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
3.4  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    8 months ago

Post 9-11 and prior to getting the full sky marshal program running many federal agents were required to carry when they flew to fill that immediate need.    Any guesses as to how much close quarter type training most had?    Yep.   Zero.

And yet, not a peep out of our friends on the left.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
4  Sparty On    8 months ago

Drove in to our airport this morning to observe the end of the world blasting this:

End of the world …… infinity 2026 version …..

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Participates
5  Drakkonis    8 months ago

Dystopian hellhole? I think I'm going to puke!  I could almost wish American citizens could be forced to live in someplace like Somalia for a period of time. A place where I saw Somali's line up for blocks outside a U.S. Army desalinization unit's excess runoff pipe. It was a single pipe ran through a compound wall.  It was maybe one inch in diameter. It was probably the only clean water most of those people had ever seen. People who had to figure out how to live among various competing warlords who didn't give a damn about them. 

If I had to point out the biggest fault of the average American, it would be that they have no idea how good they have it. They confuse first world problems with third world problems. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5.1  Sparty On  replied to  Drakkonis @5    8 months ago

Only dullards and useful idiots buy into rhetoric like this.     The target audience for the snake oil salesmen pushing it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Drakkonis @5    8 months ago
It was a single pipe ran through a compound wall.  It was maybe one inch in diameter. It was probably the only clean water most of those people had ever seen.

Why isn't Jesus helping them?  Or is Jesus busy communicating with Pete Hegseth about Hegseth's desire to have Americans pray to have God help us to kill infidels? 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6  Right Down the Center    8 months ago

Dystopian hellhole is just more hyperbole thrown out hoping it will stick.

That being said having ICE agents at airports is just putting a leaking band aid on the real issue IMO.  Getting TSA agents back to work is important and this will just shift the blame from dems not getting them paid to repubs not getting them paid.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
6.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @6    8 months ago
Dystopian hellhole is just more hyperbole thrown out hoping it will stick.

I do have to admit, it is fun to watch the left set our hair on fire and run in circles over something the people they support created.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1    8 months ago

I think it is fun watching them go from subject to subject to be upset about.  Then they forget about things and move on to the next thing.  I think they get their orders about what to be upset about around 8:00 AM every day.  Just not sure where the orders come from.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.1    8 months ago

The triggered Trumpists have one thing in mind and they never forget -- their slavish devotion to their Dear Leader.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.2    8 months ago

Reality says otherwise

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.4  Gsquared  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.3    8 months ago

Delusional triggered Trumpists wouldn't know reality if it bit them in the ass, which it often does.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
6.1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.4    8 months ago

Uh huh, sure

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1.6  bugsy  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.4    8 months ago

Delusional triggered left wing socialists wouldn't know they are being mocked relentlessly every day and that most Americans truly hate them, as they do. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.7  Gsquared  replied to  bugsy @6.1.6    8 months ago

Don't you want a link?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
6.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.7    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
6.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.1    8 months ago
go from subject to subject to be upset about.

and they do it a lot.  You might be right about the new orders being sent out daily.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1.10  Gsquared  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1.9    8 months ago
You might be right about the new orders being sent out daily.  

That's not delusional.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.11  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.10    8 months ago

says those that get their daily talking points from dementia donnie's truth social rage tweets at 4am EST ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
6.1.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gsquared @6.1.10    8 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
6.1.13  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1.12    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1.14  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @6.1.8    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1.15  cjcold  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1.1    8 months ago

Going from subject to subject is unavoidable when Trump creates a new catastrophe on a daily basis.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1.16  cjcold  replied to  cjcold @6.1.15    8 months ago

Anything to distract from the Epstein files. I guess what Bondi and Leavitt say about Trump being the most transparent president ever is actually true. It's easy to see through his bullshit lies.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1.17  bugsy  replied to  cjcold @6.1.16    8 months ago

‘Anything to distract from the Epstein files’

What distracted Biden for four years to not release those files?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    8 months ago

This is a dry run for having Trump goons intimidating polling places in November. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
7.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @7    8 months ago

The only ones intimidated are those that shouldn't be there, well, and the left

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.2  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @7    7 months ago

I can hardly wait for maga to try that ...

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
8  freepress    8 months ago

So far they are just standing around like Mall Cops or wandering around. 

Miracles! Most of them HAVE NO MASKS!!!!! 

So they aren't afraid of "doxxing" or death threats now????

Just a pack of lies tossed about to inflict these goons everywhere.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9  Jeremy Retired in NC    8 months ago

ICE agent saves unresponsive baby at JFK Airport, DHS says

Such a "dystopian hellhole".

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
9.1  cjcold  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.1.1  bugsy  replied to  cjcold @9.1    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
9.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  bugsy @9.1.1    8 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
10  bugsy    8 months ago

Yet another leftist with a whiny voice making himself look like an idiot.

Seems to be a pattern...

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
10.1  Gazoo  replied to  bugsy @10    8 months ago

Lol, that guy is a total moron.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
10.1.1  bugsy  replied to  Gazoo @10.1    8 months ago

Bigly

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
10.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Gazoo @10.1    8 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
10.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @10    7 months ago

The "I'm paying your salary" is always a good thing to say when you want something.  

Typical skid mark.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11  bugsy    8 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
11.1  Gazoo  replied to  bugsy @11    8 months ago

“Yet another unhinged lunatic racist leftist,,,,”

We see them everyday, they are all over the place.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
11.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Gazoo @11.1    7 months ago
We see them everyday, they are all over the place.

Didn't they just have a nother "protest" for something that doesn't exist in the US?

 
 

Who is online

CB


130 visitors