╌>

Trump appointees push $250 banknote with his portrait

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  6 months ago  •  71 comments

By:   Jonathan O'Connell - WSJ

Trump appointees push $250 banknote with his portrait
The printing director who resisted the effort said she was reassigned last month. “The buck stopped here,” she wrote in her goodbye.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Trump administration officials have pressed the office responsible for printing the nation’s money to design a $250 bill featuring the president’s portrait, according to four current and former employees, in what would be the first appearance of a living person on U.S. currency in more than 150 years.


Starting last year, two political appointees at the Treasury Department — U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach and his senior adviser, Mike Brown — repeatedly urged staff at the agency’s Bureau of Engraving and Printing to prepare prototypes of the note, according to the employees, who said the move raised concerns because federal law currently allows only deceased people to appear on bills.



The employees spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.



As part of the effort, Beach in August and September provided bureau staff with mock-up designs for the note, including one that shows President Donald Trump’s face in the center of the $250 bill between the signatures of the president and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, according to one of the employees and records reviewed by The Washington Post.



The artist who said he designed the mock-up told The Post that he had spoken with Trump about it.



British painter Iain Alexander said Trump endorsed changes to his original design, such as adding the colors of the American flag and a logo commemorating the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding.



“He likes to call me his favorite British artist,” said Alexander, a former competitive swimmer and DJ who describes himself as a royal portrait artist of Queen Elizabeth II and others.


No living person has appeared on U.S. currency since 1866, when it was outlawed after the image of a mid-level Treasury bureaucrat showed up on a 5-cent note. Legislation that would allow Trump to appear on a $250 bill was introduced in Congress last year to commemorate the nation’s 250th anniversary but has languished.



In a statement, a Treasury Department spokesperson said the printing office “is conducting appropriate planning and due diligence” in response to the proposed legislation.


“Should this legislative mandate be signed into law, the BEP is moving proactively to produce a $250 commemorative note which will appropriately recognize the 250th Anniversary of our great nation,” the statement said.



The director of the printing bureau, Patricia “Patty” Solimene, and other staff repeatedly explained to Beach and Brown that there were legal and procedural obstacles to producing the note and that it would take years longer than they envisioned, the four employees said.


The two political appointees were dismissive in response, two of the current employees said.


“She had told them we’re not authorized to do this. We can’t progress any further, and all the stakeholders have not even met to discuss the next steps,” said one of the employees. “Currency often takes six to eight years to produce a new bill, particularly one of such high value.”



Solimene said she was abruptly reassigned from her post by Treasury management on April 27, writing the next day in an email to colleagues that she was leaving with a “heavy heart.” She wrote in her goodbye email, a copy of which was obtained by The Post, that she had been   reassigned to another job in the Treasury Department and that her departure was “not my choice.”


She added that she “never sacrificed the values or character of myself or the organization and always prioritized the U.S. Currency Program and the value each employee brings to the mission.”


“The buck stopped here,” she wrote.


Solimene did not specify in the email why she was reassigned and did not return calls seeking comment. A 24-year Army veteran,   she had been the   first female director   of the bureau.



Brown, formerly a senior adviser to Beach, has since been named the bureau’s acting director. He did not return messages seeking comment.



The Treasury statement said Beach has “never asked staff to print the bill before congressional passage.” The agency declined to comment on Solimene’s reassignment. The White House did not respond to requests for comment.



Solimene and her staff had consented to another administration request: to print $100 bills featuring Trump’s signature, according to the four employees. They said those bills — the first in American history to bear a sitting president’s signature — are currently being printed at the bureau’s downtown Washington facility.

“Based on the recommendation of U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach, Secretary Bessent will recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Trump by adding his signature to the currency,” the Treasury statement said.


While no law prohibits printing bills with Trump’s signature, U.S. currency experts say that producing a $250 note featuring the president‘s image would run afoul of current laws. One states only a “deceased individual” may be depicted on American currency. Another   specifies which denominations   the bureau may produce.


Larry R. Felix, a former director of the bureau,   said “a $250 note is not statutorily authorized” without an act of Congress.



“The secretary has to be given authority to do that,” he said, referring to Bessent.



Alexander, the artist, said he was also told legislation was required. “I’ve been informed that it has to go through Congress,” he said.



A second challenge, experts said, is that designing and printing any new note typically necessitates extensive coordination with the Federal Reserve, the Secret Service and private sector partners.


Felix said it took more than a decade to design and produce a $100 note with dozens of embedded security features that prevented counterfeiting.



Brown, a Trump appointee who started at Treasury in October, is a former Kansas Republican Party chairman.


Beach, who was appointed treasurer in March 2025 and has direct oversight of the U.S. Mint, is a former Georgia state senator who backed Trump’s 2020 election   denial claims . He did not respond to messages seeking comment.



“These guys think you can just print something overnight and it’s going to work in an ATM. It’s just crazy,” said one of the employees. “It takes years and years and years to produce these notes so they are reliable for the public.”



The effort to make a $250 note coincides with the Trump administration’s plans to celebrate the 250th anniversary of America’s founding starting this July. Trump has proposed building a 250-foot triumphal arch at the foot of Arlington National Cemetery and a “Garden of Heroes” in Washington featuring   250 statues .



Last month the State Department announced it would begin issuing passports featuring Trump’s portrait and signature to commemorate the anniversary, a move that did not require an act of Congress.


In February 2025, Rep. Joe Wilson (R-South Carolina) introduced a bill  that would order the Treasury secretary “to print $250 Federal reserve notes featuring a portrait of Donald Trump.” The bill was referred to the House Financial Services Committee but has not received a hearing.


In a statement to The Post, a spokesperson for Wilson’s office thanked Beach for endorsing the proposed legislation and said Wilson has spoken multiple times to the committee’s chairman about moving it forward.



“We can also confirm that both Treasury Secretary Bessent and President Trump have spoken with Rep. Wilson about their support for this on multiple occasions,” the statement said.



In January, Rep. Andy Barr (R-Kentucky) posted a   photo   on X showing him and Beach holding a mock-up of the bill with the colors of the flag and the “250” logo. Alexander, the British painter, confirmed it was a design he had created after receiving Trump’s feedback.


The Post contacted Alexander because his signature appears below the mock-up design that was provided to bureau staffers in August.


For the back of the note, Alexander said he proposed a theme of “women’s liberation” featuring Betsy Ross, the seamstress who made flags during the American Revolution.



Trump’s feedback? “He absolutely loved it,” Alexander said.



Alexander said in addition to the $250 note, he is also working on a much larger art project for the America 250 celebration but has had some difficulty getting regular feedback from Trump since the start of the war in Iran.



“You can appreciate all he’s got on his plate at the moment,” he said.











Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    6 months ago

Hubris mated Arrogance and begat Trump.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @1    6 months ago

I could embrace that idea with a few modifications to the portrait. let your imagination run with that ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.1    6 months ago

You stop letting your imagination run away with that. You fave moderator already slapped you with a death wishing ticket.

I think they should portray him with out the benefit of hair and make-up people

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.2  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.1    6 months ago
with a death wishing ticket.

Yikes, an eternal life is a far worse fate. Can I get permanently ticketed for wishing him one of those?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.1    6 months ago

... one with points. no worries, I've already retaliated. AI + VPN = fun, fun, fun ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hallux @1.1.2    6 months ago

play your cards right...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.5  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.1    6 months ago
I think they should portray him with out the benefit of hair and make-up people

bribe the person on staff that has to maintain his bathroom to switch his shampoo with hair remover ...

maga probably won't vote for somebody that looks like a fat uncle fester ...

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Participates
1.2  Drakkonis  replied to  Hallux @1    6 months ago
Hubris mated Arrogance and begat Trump.

As I've said before, Trump is his own worst enemy. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Drakkonis @1.2    6 months ago

While true, sadly he has millions of enablers who do not care what he does to them or to our nation. Apparently, he could shoot someone on 5th Ave or rape a MAGAites mother right in front of them and he'd getting nothing but big smiles and a thumbs up from his supporters. So, when he suggests putting his face on money rational people at first think "He can't do that, that's illegal" but then realize Trumps ass kissing sycophants are currently in control of congress and wouldn't put it past them to do their utmost to please their naked Emperor.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  cjcold  replied to  Drakkonis @1.2    5 months ago

Does that mean we can expect him to shoot himself anytime soon? 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.3  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @1.2.2    5 months ago

meh, he'd probably fuck that up too ...

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Hallux @1    6 months ago

If this actually happens, what's next?  Renaming America "The United States of Trump"?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2  Right Down the Center    6 months ago

Surprised he didn't go for the 10,000 note

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Right Down the Center @2    6 months ago

It would be just as illegal and more on brand for such a useless dumb shit. That and the vast majority of his sycophants couldn't afford to even touch one.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    6 months ago

uh huh

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1    6 months ago

If Pete Buttigieg were to become (God forbid) president, and he proposed himself on a three dollar bill, would you support it?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  bugsy @2.1.2    6 months ago
If Pete Buttigieg were to become (God forbid) president, and he proposed himself on a three dollar bill, would you support it?

Of course not, that would be illegal. The Thayer amendment prohibits any living person's portrait from appearing on U.S. bonds, securities, notes, or postal currency. Also, the 'Coin Act of 2005' prevents even a coin from being issued that bears the image of a living president, or a deceased president within two years of their death. So, the bloviating bumbling bigot bitch Donnie couldn't even put his ugly mug on the expiring penny.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.3    6 months ago
Of course not, that would be illegal.

Then you don't need to worry about Trump and a 250.

The poutrage is manufactured,

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  bugsy @2.1.4    6 months ago
Then you don't need to worry about Trump and a 250.

Why not? When has Trump ever cared about the law?

AI Overview: "laws broken by Trump"
Legal experts, federal courts, and nonpartisan watchdogs have identified multiple instances where actions taken by Donald Trump’s administration broke federal laws and the U.S. Constitution. These violations span several major areas: 
1. Impoundment of Funds and Budgetary Laws
  • Violation of the Impoundment Control Act: Federal courts and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the Trump administration broke the law by illegally withholding and impounding congressionally appropriated funds—including millions promised to the Emergency Food and Shelter Program. Judges repeatedly ruled that the executive branch lacks the authority to unilaterally freeze funds already approved by Congress. 
2. The Hatch Act
  • Use of Official Office for Campaigning: The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) found that numerous senior Trump administration aides systematically broke the Hatch Act by using official government positions and federal property for partisan political activity. The OSC issued unprecedented recommendations for the removal of high-level officials due to these blatant ethics and legal violations. 
3. Immigration Law and Constitutional Rights
  • Overreach on Birthright Citizenship: The administration's executive action attempting to end birthright citizenship was blocked by federal judges, with legal experts citing direct violations of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
  • Unlawful Asylum Bans: Policies that categorically barred undocumented migrants from applying for asylum were blocked by federal judges for violating U.S. immigration and human rights statutes. 
4. Preservation of Official Records
  • Violation of the Presidential Records Act: During his time in office, Trump was documented repeatedly ripping up and destroying official White House records. The destruction and unauthorized removal of these classified and historic documents—which were later retrieved by the National Archives from his Florida residence—violated laws requiring the preservation of presidential papers. 
5. Constitutional Overreach and the Posse Comitatus Act
  • Military Policing of Civilians: Legal scholars and constitutional experts warned that the administration’s use of the military to police domestic civilians and enforce civilian law in cities like Los Angeles crossed legal bounds, clashing with the Posse Comitatus Act. 

And that's not even getting into his disdain for the law as evidenced by his charity being shut down and fined for fraud, two of his businesses found guilty on 17 counts of tax fraud, his use of campaign funds to pay off porn stars during his campaign, the list of law breaking goes on and on and on.

So, this President doesn't give a fuck about the law or patriotic law-abiding Americans, he only cares for those millions of racist rats who continually gnaw at his balloon knot for sustenance and empower him to ignore the law and the constitution.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.1.6  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.5    6 months ago

Nice rant but expected.

I went back through your posts to see where you posted "outrage" over laws broken by the Biden admin, but surprisingly s/, there was none...

From google AI

1. Unilateral Student Loan Forgiveness

Opponents argue Biden exceeded his authority by forgiving student loans without congressional approval. The Supreme Court blocked the $430B plan in 2023.

Alleged laws involved:

  • Exceeding executive authority under the HEROES Act

  • Violating separation of powers

Outcome: Supreme Court ruled against the administration.

2. CDC Eviction Moratorium Extension

Conservative lawmakers and commentators argue Biden violated the Constitution by extending the CDC eviction moratorium despite warnings it might be unconstitutional.

Alleged constitutional issue:

  • Failure to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed”

  • Executive overreach

Outcome: Supreme Court struck down the moratorium.

3. OSHA COVID‑19 Vaccine Mandate Overreach

Critics claim the administration violated separation of powers by imposing workplace vaccine/testing mandates through OSHA.

Outcome: Supreme Court blocked the mandate.

To quote someone here, but can't remember who,..

"So, this President doesn't give a fuck about the law or patriotic law-abiding Americans, he only cares for those millions of racist rats who continually gnaw at his balloon knot for sustenance and empower him to ignore the law and the constitution.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.7  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @2.1.6    6 months ago
I went back through your posts to see where you posted "outrage" over laws broken by the Biden admin, but surprisingly s/, there was none...

1280

Show us where any PotUS created a $1.776 billion slush fund to pay his supporters.   That is an example of something deserving of outrage.   I do not see you posting outrage on this.

Or any of this where Trump:

  • tried to steal the 2020 election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement
  • surrounded himself with incompetent sycophants
  • tried to keep classified documents and obstructed their safe return for months
  • engaged in true lawfare, blatantly so, directing the AG (never should be done) to go after select political opponents (e.g. Comey, James, Cook, ...)
  • coerced private businesses (e.g. Perkins Coie LLP) and universities (e.g. Harvard) with threats of denying federal business opportunities/funding
  • overstepped authority and effectively killed USAID, which was congressionally approved, and abruptly , irresponsibly cut life-critical funding worldwide
  • removed watch dogs (e.g. inspectors general, FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter,...) and fired DoJ attorneys, et.al. who worked on his indictments
  • unilaterally destroyed the East Wing
  • accepts outrageously expensive gifts such as the Qatar jet (which will now cost at least $400 million in taxpayer dollars to prepare)
  • renamed the Kennedy center to arrogantly put his own name as top billing
  • abused the use of the National guard to deploy to cities as a political show
  • more than doubled ICE personnel with demonstrably poorly vetted, poorly trained individuals, and then unleashed them en masse into communities
  • abuse of tariff power which pointlessly damaged USA reputation worldwide and triggered trading partners to strategically establish trade alternatives other than the USA
  • pullback from WHO, UN, UNFCCC, etc. reducing the USA's international leadership
  • anti climate change initiatives (as if trying to further damage the environment)
  • destroyed the East Wing and wants taxpayers to foot $1 billion to provide the necessary security infrastructure his ballroom
  • blatant attempt to steal the 2026 midterms by coercing states to gerrymander for political (not census) reasons
  • failed miserably on his campaign promise to lower prices
  • failed miserably on his campaign promise to end the Ukraine war
  • is a national embarrassment given he is the voice, face, and hand of the USA, yet publicly trolls our allies (in particular, Canada) and whines about not being awarded the Peace Prize and then vindictively threatens not to be motivated for peace
  • has substantially increased both deficit spending and the national debt (in direct opposition of his promises)
  • has created a $1.776 billion slush fund using taxpayer dollars to pay his supporters after commuting the sentences of his mob that violently breached the Capitol to disrupt a session of Congress
  • has created an IRS invulnerability for himself, his sons, and his businesses
  • used DoJ to vindictively go after E. Jean Carroll because she won a lawsuit against him
 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.8  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  bugsy @2.1.6    6 months ago
I went back through your posts to see where you posted "outrage" over laws broken by the Biden admin

Why would there be? We're talking about the current President actually proposing breaking the law by putting himself on a $250 bill. Why the fuck would I bring up Biden?[✘]

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
2.1.9  Gazoo  replied to  bugsy @2.1.6    6 months ago

“Nice rant”

That’s debatable.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.1.10  Gsquared  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.8    6 months ago

What the Trumpists don't want to mention is that a career employee of the Treasury Dept. LOST HER JOB because she...

repeatedly warned [Trump regime officials] that the agency lacked authorization 

It's no wonder that the majority of Americans, the sane Americans, feel revulsion towards Trump and his vile wannabe dictatorship.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
2.1.12  Raven Wing   replied to  TᵢG @2.1.7    6 months ago

Plus......he was already a convicted felon when elected to be POTUS. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.13  devangelical  replied to  Raven Wing @2.1.12    5 months ago

that's an endearing virtue to maga ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.14  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @2.1.13    5 months ago

... just like child molestation.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.15  cjcold  replied to  bugsy @2.1.4    5 months ago

He put his ugly mug on the park pass. Takes the fun out of camping at a national park.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    6 months ago

I would support putting his image on a penny.  Not more than one though, he's not worth two cents. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @3    6 months ago

Not bad, not bad at all.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @3    6 months ago

I wouldn't stoop to pick one of those up from the ground

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2    6 months ago

I would.  If there was only one in the world it would most likely be worth a fortune.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.2.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2    6 months ago
I wouldn't stoop to pick one of those up from the ground

I would piss on it, then pick it up with gloves and auction it off to some wealthy Trump sycophant.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
4  Hal A. Lujah    6 months ago

Well, he is queer as a 250 dollar bill.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    6 months ago

a $250 bill with that asshole's picture on it is appropriate, since that's what a tank of gas or a bag of groceries is going to cost soon ...

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5  Hal A. Lujah    6 months ago

800

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5    6 months ago

Now that I like

 
 
 
shona1
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  shona1  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1    6 months ago

Arvo...or you could go for a cheaper alternative..just stamp $250 on it and you would be hot to trot and ready to flush down the dunny...

256

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.2  devangelical  replied to  shona1 @5.1.1    6 months ago

wrong picture for the dunny roll, mate. his mouth needs to be opened wider with his tongue hanging out ...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  devangelical @5.1.2    5 months ago
his mouth needs to be opened wider with his tongue hanging out ...

Something like this perhaps?

28Collins-01-superJumbo.jpg

Frankly, I couldn't stand having to look at his face even if it was to wipe my ass on. I think it would also be a little weird to wipe your asshole with an asshole. That's just a little too "Inception" for me.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.3    5 months ago

it seemed logical to me, since that's what basically flows out of his mouth anyway ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.3    5 months ago

Imagine sitting down on the pot every morning and seeing that next to you....before you've had your coffee!!!!

 
 
 
shona1
Professor Quiet
5.1.6  shona1  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.5    5 months ago

Evening Fishy..well if you were constipated you sure as heck wouldn't be after seeing that..😊

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  shona1 @5.1.6    5 months ago

Or your constipation just get worse! The bunghole makes itself as small as possible when in disgust

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.3    5 months ago
a little weird to wipe your asshole with an asshole

the ink is probably toxic ...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.2  Gsquared  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5    6 months ago

He never looked better.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @5.2    5 months ago

he's got a better look coming just around the bend ...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6  evilone    6 months ago

I guess I'm not surprised there was no satire tag. Trump's ego should have required something bigger...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1  devangelical  replied to  evilone @6    5 months ago

the US mint is already stamping gold coins with trump's face on them ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  devangelical @6.1    5 months ago

I believe it is the UFC doing this.  But it is still sickening to watch a PotUS engage in such extreme self-aggrandizement.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @6.1    5 months ago

are they defaceable with a black Sharpie?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.3  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.2    5 months ago

they need to be like those foreign coins that have a hole in them. any suggestions on where that hole should be?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @6.1.3    5 months ago

not saying. I already made one TOS comment today

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.5  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.4    5 months ago

point to the place on the trumpy bear's head ...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7  Dismayed Patriot    6 months ago

Well, with Trump in charge fucking us with inflation and flushing our country down the toilet that $250 won't be worth the paper it's printed on halfway through the rightwing conservatives desired 'dear Leaders' third term...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8  Tacos!    6 months ago

MAGA can’t defend this, but is here to attack non-MAGA for disapproving of it. Typical.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @8    5 months ago

thou must own the libs ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.1  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @8.1    5 months ago

... 13th commandment.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
8.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @8.1    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @8.1.1    5 months ago

What are 11-12?

this ought to be good

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @8.1.3    5 months ago

11 was raygun's thou shalt not speak ill of another republican, 12 is still being debated ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.5  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @8.1.4    5 months ago

12 - thou shalt not get caught in a cheap motel with underage sex slaves, before CPAC or the RNC convention...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.1.6  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  devangelical @8.1.5    5 months ago
12 - thou shalt not get caught in a cheap motel with underage sex slaves, before CPAC or the RNC convention...

You're close, but it's "12 - thou shalt not get caught in a cheap motel with underage sex slaves, before CPAC or the RNC convention, but if you do, deny it was you and blame Democrats.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.7  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @8.1.6    5 months ago

I believe 13 is the age of consent for maga sex in the south, I'm not sure about the girls though ...

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
9  Freefaller    5 months ago

A lot of places I know won't even accept a $100 bill, what point would there be to having a $250 note

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
9.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Freefaller @9    5 months ago

If you're MAGA you have it framed and hung on the wall. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.2  devangelical  replied to  Freefaller @9    5 months ago
A lot of places I know won't even accept a $100 bill

... they do when it costs over $80 to fill your tank.

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
9.2.1  Freefaller  replied to  devangelical @9.2    5 months ago
.. they do when it costs over $80 to fill your tank.

Lol do people still pay for stuff like gas with cash anymore?  I've had the same $60 in cash in my wallet for over 3 years now

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.2.2  devangelical  replied to  Freefaller @9.2.1    5 months ago

I'm going by past experience, since I use a debit card now, and give myself a $100 per month allowance for pocket money ...

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
12  MrFrost    5 months ago

250, worth about one tank of gas.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
12.1  JBB  replied to  MrFrost @12    5 months ago

original

 
 

Who is online








77 visitors