The Blaze's Jason Whitlock rages against women's suffrage: “Not everybody has to have a vote”
Right wing media pundit says women don't need to vote.
"When we were a culture that really valued family and really understood the natural order that God intended, man serving God, woman following man who serves God"
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
video at link
JASON WHITLOCK: They have recreated this history that oh God, it was all just sexism, and we didn’t have the right to vote until Susan B. Anthony and the women’s suffrage movement and I will defend life before suffrage. Because a vote used to represent the family. When we were a culture that really valued family and really understood the natural order that God intended, man serving God, woman following man who serves God, man and woman developing and nurturing children.
You only needed one vote per household because that vote was about the entire family as they have destroyed our family structure and made this all an individual pursuit. Not everybody has to have a vote and everybody has an agenda that a lot of times has nothing to do with family.
Tags
Who is online
80 visitors
This type of crap, 99 times out of a hundred, comes from right wing mouths.
[✘]
[✘]
100 percent of people saying men can get pregnant comes from LWNJs so what is your point?
Perhaps Whitlock has no idea of our constitution and what it covers.
Difficult to believe that he finds that a family should have only one vote, is he not aware of the civil rights movement?
I wonder what he would say if someone said "black people don't need to vote" .
I am certain that he would change his tune in a hot minute.
He would correct them to say “black women don’t need to vote.”
that right there is a good answer
May I duct tape this guy's lips?
Whitlock is a short-sighted fool that thinks being a "Head of a family" will be his way into voting cultural in his make-believe future U.S.! It will not. Sooner or later 'somebody' will "remember" he used to NOT have a claim to voting culture at all and move to renew that state of his existence.
Leave it to you to jump in and defend the indefensible.
Why would you lend any support to this asshole? To any thinking person that is what you are doing.
[Deleted]
Which one?
This ridiculous speaking man should remember that the Southern Baptists did not apologize for its positive position on slavery until 1995.
I am losing faith in religious organizations--All of them!
Back when men had the right to beat and rape their wives. Abuse their children. Demand supper and a drink as soon as he got home. The days when women couldn't open their own bank accounts or had to get permission from The Man of the House to get an outside job.
You know...the good ol' days <blech>
Sounds like what Islam teaches about the place of women. Can't go outside without a relative, and have to cover their hair. And honor killings are probably still allowed in some Muslim societies
Interesting. . . . You actually had to reach across to "Muslim societies" to find and compare with prementioned "good old days"for girls and women in the United States! That does not make your point look 'better.' You may or may not remember that "once upon a time in the U.S. . . . " there were 'kings,' small K, of their Castles, namely males—alone. Women were their less than equal "subordinates by law and culture!
Um, you really should read the bible...it's far worse.
I KNEW this was coming, even posted comments about it elsewhere on this site. After attempts to limit mail-in ballots, gerrymandering to isolate liberal voters which has found some success in the courts, now that it is obvious that women are rallying to defy being turned into handmaidens and their vote will surely decimate the Republicans next November it was BOUND to happen that the conservatives might take a shot at reversing women's suffrage.
Your point is not valid. Most men don't feel this way.
Prove otherwise.
Make me.
You mean after Democrats introduced new laws during Covid that violated many state laws and allowed ballot harvesting, drop boxes, and other measures that broke chain of custody? Most didn't even require proper signature verification.
You don't think Democrats gerrymander to limit Republican voters? You don't think that California, Pennsylvania, and Michigan election laws that don't take into account voters- but only population including criminals, illegals, and children not old enough to vote doesn't favor Democrat bastion of stupidity large cities with a plethora of all of those?
Only complete idiots think that will happen. Which is perfect for over reactionary, hyper sensitive, in need of vast safe spaces leftists that believe anytime something doesn't go their way it must be literally burned down.
Hey Ronin2, take a pill, cool out, all I was doing was following the lead of Whitlock's rage. Don't bust a blood vessel. I comment on issues, and I don't follow party lines. I'm not a Democrat or a Republican, a liberal or a conservative - I'm not even an American so don't get your balls in an uproar. LOL
What we have seen and read about here is a descendant of oppression negatively squaring off against the descendants of another form of oppression. This fool actually fixed his lips to mouth the words, 'A woman's place is UNDER a man, literally and figuratively!' Oh, the "H" - NO! There are sufficient numbers of women who do not wish to be 'Lorded' over. Subsequently, Christian women and other religious women can be happy in their own 'places' and leave non-religious women free to their FREEDOMS!