╌>

Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  last year  •  38 comments

By:    Daniel Dale

Fact check: Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen.

Trump   claimed in a social media post   that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024   event in Houston . But there is simply no basis for Trump’s claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular.

Federal campaign spending records show   a $165,000 payment   from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé’s production company, which the campaign listed as a “campaign event production” expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson   told Deadline   last year that they didn’t pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances.

Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it’s far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was “$10 million” began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites   FactCheck.org   and   PolitiFact   looked into the “$10 million” claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it.

The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump’s $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an   interview in February , he described his source in the vaguest of terms: “Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.”

A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November  social media post  by Beyoncé’s mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a “lie” and noted it was taken down by Instagram as “False Information.”

“When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris’s (sic) Rally in Houston,” Knowles wrote.

A spokesperson for Beyoncé   told PolitiFact in November   that the claim about a $10 million payment is “beyond ridiculous.”

What Trump wrote Sunday


Trump revived the false claim   in a social media post   published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at “the fact” that Democrats “admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.”

Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment.

Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is “TOTALLY ILLEGAL” to pay for political endorsements, though   no federal law   forbids   endorsement payments .

Trump concluded: “Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a   post   in May, when he said he would call for a “major investigation” on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions.


Red Box Rules


Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion.



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    last year

It sounds like Beyonce could have a successful defamation lawsuit against the Liar-in-Chief.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Gsquared @1    last year

But the SCotUS will say that the man who is above the law can do no wrong. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1.1    last year

And that's how democracy ends...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.1    last year

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.1.8  Krishna  replied to  devangelical @1.1.2    last year
Beyoncé Responds To President Trump

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2  seeder  Gsquared    last year
“Somebody just showed me something.”

That's his proof...

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.1  Thomas  replied to  Gsquared @2    last year

He should just say he made it up. That is enough to pass SCotUS muster. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @2    last year

many people are saying ...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.2.1  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @2.2    last year

Some say.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.2  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @2.2.1    last year

everyone knows ...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.2.3  cjcold  replied to  devangelical @2.2.2    last year

All Americans agree.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2.2.4  Krishna  replied to  devangelical @2.2    last year
many people are saying ...

Nobody's ever seen anything like that! 

jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2.2.5  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @2.2.4    last year
many people are saying ...
Nobody's eve seen anything like that! 

In any event, thank you for your attention to this matter!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.2.6  cjcold  replied to  Krishna @2.2.5    last year

Trump sez eat the peanuts out of my ass.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3  CB    last year

Why does this man still have any credibility when he speaks? When will it be considered what it is presidential Overreach' to prosecute (persecute) any body he wills?  Wasting the persecuted time and in some cases monies? 

Do we just sit and spin while he 'wears' himself out (and others too)?  Maybe. We can hope that it will 'end' by December 2025. And the new year will be better for 'all' future planned persecution prospects.

Incidentally, the one occasion Beyoncé appeared publicly to support VP Harris, she took 'painful' time to explain that she was there as a mother supporting a future for her child. And, not in her role as an Entertainer of great renown and influence. That is, it was not a brand endorsement to be sure. (See the video. It is out there.)

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  CB @3    last year
Why does this man still have any credibility when he speaks?

He doesn't.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
3.2  Krishna  replied to  CB @3    last year
Maybe. We can hope that it will 'end' by December 2025. And the new year will be better for 'all' future planned persecution prospects. Incidentally, the one occasion Beyoncé appeared publicly to support VP Harris, she took 'painful' time to explain that she was there as a mother supporting a future for her child. And, not in her role as an Entertainer of great renown and influence. That is, it was not a brand endorsement to be sure. (See the video. It is out there.)

Well . . . you might be right!

(Hopefully you won't get persecuted for it!!!)

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    last year
“Somebody just showed me something."

Beyonce should sue his ass for 50 billion. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year

I like $100 billion.

Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime is defamation per se in most jurisdictions.  The statement is considered so inherently harmful that damages are presumed and specific damages do not need to be proved.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    last year

Some of these high profile people Trump attacks need to start fighting fire with fire. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.2    last year

Trump says he is accusing Beyonce based on "something someone showed me". He seemingly doesnt even remember what it was. 

Why is that ok with you? 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.4  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.2    last year

You have no idea what the law is.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.4    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.5    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
4.1.9  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.3    last year
"something someone showed me

Actually "someone" didn't show him anything!

(And if they can't be persecuted for that, at least prosecuting them might be worthwhile!)

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
4.1.10  Krishna  replied to  Gsquared @4.1.4    last year
You have no idea what the law is.

Well, social media can be like that at times!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  Krishna @4.1.10    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.12  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.13  Tacos!  replied to  Gsquared @4.1    last year

I like $100 billion.

original

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
4.2  CB  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year

It would be just desserts. Hold "the President" to his own behavior. Goose meet Gander.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5  Bob Nelson    last year
based on something that did not actually happen

Of course it happened... in Trump's "mind".

And the only important facts in America today are those in Trump's "mind".

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.1  Krishna  replied to  Bob Nelson @5    last year
Of course it happened... in Trump's "mind".

Trump has an actual mind ??? jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    last year
“Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.”

Probably the same “somebody” who told him they’re eating dogs and cats in Ohio.

People VOTED for this lying ignoramous! WTF is wrong with people???

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1  TᵢG  replied to  Tacos! @7    last year

Even worse, Tacos!, people today —in spite of all that we know— still support and defend the psychopathic demagogue.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7.1.1  CB  replied to  TᵢG @7.1    last year

Trump has been giving MAGA what it wants. That is, he is 'owning the libs'. . . that is, Trump is systematically unknotting and trashing liberal policies going back to 1930s social security act. . . and 1960s "Great society" - and, he has effectively gained a conservative SCOTUS (with potential to add more conservatives to it and other courts for their lifetimes). . . something conservatives have long wanted to do (leave the democrats without 'any' official federal 'help' for their 'pleads'). And, Trump 'only' listens to MAGA  voices and not the 'bleeping' of the Others being casted into outer darkness.

What Epstein has permitted is a chink in the shield of invulnerability of Trump voters. Only time will tell if 'rust' can set in and widen that chink.

Trump is PERFECT for the 'job' MAGA supporters have for him to do. He relishes it! They relish him. He relishes that he is finally his own man in charge doing (99.99) percent of whatever comes into his head and nobody 'able' to do a damn thing about it—as long as the 'armor' withstands pressure!

I conclude that MAGA supporters give less than a __________________ what liberals and secularists think of Trump and themselves. They are in their version of 'paradise' on Earth. Finally, they have the man they want: Their MAN: No more "compassionate" conservative leadership which they hated to their core. MAGA wants cruelty to liberals and secularists. They want YOU and ME to know our place in this society. . . that place: On our knees looking up to them.

This is what they think the 18th century constitutional document gives them the power to be: A Conservative and Christian nation. That is what "M-A-G-A" means: "Taking our country Back!"

MAGA supporters believe they are the 'check' on Donald and only them. He will stay in-charge as long as they want him to be. They see themselves alone as the ones with the power to 'remove' him.

These intelligent fools are serious as a 'heart attack'!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7.1.2  CB  replied to  CB @7.1.1    last year

BTW, that is MAGA supporters LEVERAGE over Trump. . .and his over his supporters. Don't give them what they want and they won't be docile for any certain length of time.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
7.2  cjcold  replied to  Tacos! @7    last year

It's called extremely low IQs. The far-right wing wallows in their stupidity and ignorance. Fuck all fascists!!!!!!!!

 
 

Who is online




112 visitors