╌>

White House begins demolishing part of East Wing for Trump ballroom

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  last year  •  47 comments

By:   Bernd Debusmann Jr

White House begins demolishing part of East Wing for Trump ballroom
Crews tore down a massive covered entryway and windows in the East Wing to make way for Trump's new event space.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Demolition has begun on part of the East Wing of the White House in preparation for the construction of US President Donald Trump's new ballroom.

Construction crews tore down massive chunks of a covered entryway and windows in the East Wing on Monday, which Trump said is being "fully modernised".

The president previously said that his $250m (£186m) White House ballroom addition would be "near" the existing structure but would not change it.

"It won't interfere with the current building. It won't be. It'll be near it but not touching it - and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of," Trump said in July. "It's my favourite. It's my favourite place. I love it."

Trump announced the construction in a social media post, saying "ground has been broken" on the "much-needed" ballroom space.

"For more than 150 years, every President has dreamt about having a Ballroom at the White House to accommodate people for grand parties, State Visits, etc," he wrote.

grey-placeholder.png 1d933780-adf7-11f0-b36f-b1e901b92715.png.webp

                             BBC/Bernd Debusmann Jr

He said the project is being privately funded by "by many generous Patriots".

The White House has served as the historic home of the US president for two centuries. The East Wing was constructed in 1902 and was last modified in 1942.

From the south side of the building, the BBC saw several large pieces of construction equipment - some adorned with US flags - near the East Wing.

Trump wrote in his post that the East Wing was "completely separate" from the White House, though it is attached to the main structure.

The covered entryway, which spans much of the East Wing's south side, appeared to be being gutted, with concrete debris and metal cables clearly visible from several hundred meters.

The activity had attracted a small number of curious onlookers who stopped to ask photographers and reporters what was going on.

One woman, who was wearing a surgical mask and a sign with an anti-Trump slogan on it, expressed her dismay. She did not identify herself.

"I don't like it," she said - seemingly speaking to nobody in particular - as she gestured at the White House from behind a yellow van that was parked nearby. "Look what he's doing to it!"


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    last year
" It won't interfere with the current building. It won't be. It'll be near it but not touching it (Emphasis added)- and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of," Trump said in July. "It's my favourite. It's my favourite place. I love it."

-- Says the Liar-in-Chief

                                original

Photo from Instagram

Trump's vision for America --

  original

Photo from ABC News

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1  TᵢG  replied to  Gsquared @1    last year

This truly is representative of Trump's presidency.   He introduces unnecessary chaos for his own benefit, lies about it, and leaves the nation with yet another scar.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @1.1    last year

Trump has frequently been called a Chaos Agent, which is appropriate, but more appropriately, he is the Master of Destruction and, at the moment, he increasingly has America in his nefarious grip.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @1    last year

That photo alone defines all of trmp's presidency

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2    last year

since he's already destroying our government and country, he might as well destroy the people's house too. DC has cold winters, it's unfair that the throngs of unamerican white trash willing to suck his dick for favors wait outside in the weather while he holds court ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    last year

It ain't that cold. He should go to Fairbanks, Alaska in the middle of January

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.2    last year

there's lots of high powered hunting rifles with scopes in alaska ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @1.2.3    last year

lots of dangerous moose and bears that's why

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.5  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.4    last year

... but they're so cute and fuzzy. it's just a big open air petting zoo for maga ...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  Gsquared @1    last year

I provided information about how to contact elected officials on the seed posted to Newsviners. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.1  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @1.3    last year

 republicans turned trump loose, let them clean up his shit ...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.3.2  Nerm_L  replied to  devangelical @1.3.1    last year
republicans turned trump loose, let them clean up his shit ...

Why are Democrats so fucking stupid?  Donald Trump just removed First Ladies from the future of the Presidency.  To Trump women are just a fashion accessory for rich men.

There is not place for a First Lady in the White House any longer.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.3  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @1.3.2    last year
There is not place for a First Lady in the White House any longer.

melania is either in NYC or miami gang-banging her mormon secret service detail ...

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.3.4  Thomas  replied to  Nerm_L @1.3.2    last year

It's because she was hiding from him in there. One less place to go.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.3.5  1stwarrior  replied to  devangelical @1.3.3    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.3.6  1stwarrior  replied to  1stwarrior @1.3.5    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2  Ed-NavDoc    last year

Hate to break this to some folks, but almost every president who has ever resided in the White House has made structural changes to the White House both great and small. Why should Trump be any different?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @2    last year

I suppose you would support naming Trump's vanity project "His Majesty's Grand Ballroom".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @2.1    last year

Would anyone like to bet there will a big ass ole statue of Trump in the ballroom ?  Probably more than one. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Gsquared @2.1    last year

Actually, no I would not. But that is not going to happen and you know it as well as I do.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @2.1.2    last year
But that is not going to happen and you know it as well as I do.

I am sure many on the left will call it what it is so they can use it.  "The peoples ballroom at the peoples house".

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.1.3    last year

trump's pedophile palace ...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.2  Nerm_L  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @2    last year
Hate to break this to some folks, but almost every president who has ever resided in the White House has made structural changes to the White House both great and small. Why should Trump be any different?

But prior Presidents had some taste and style.  Trump's tacky bordello decorations aren't very impressive.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Nerm_L @2.2    last year
Trump's tacky bordello decorations aren't very impressive.

melania does the WH interiors ...

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.3  bugsy  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @2    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.3.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  bugsy @2.3    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
2.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @2    last year

Ed,

That is simply not true. Presidents have made decorating changes, but not structural changes like this. The last structural change was:

In 1948 under Truman, who fixed the interior was completely gutted and rebuilt with a steel and concrete frame to prevent collapse, a process that doubled the number of rooms and added two basement levels. It did not change the exterior of the building, and it was not a vanity project.

AI overview:

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
3  freepress    last year

I thought Republicans wanted badly to preserve history like Confederate monuments.

So where are they on this atrocity and destruction of White House property and it's history?

This is the wing that contained FDR's WWII bunker. Was that not significant enough to fight for it's historical preservation?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4  Nerm_L    last year

I do hope some future President sues the Trump organization to recoup the cost of restoration.  

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5  Hal A. Lujah    last year

President Douchebag has more up his sleeve.  The White House is about to be renamed.

original

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5    last year

If he makes it through four years the whole White House complex will be gone , replaced by a replica of Maralago . And the first families private quarters will look like this - 

Trump-penthouse-1-1200x630.jpg

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    last year

that is so gross

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.1    last year

one of my close friends was a historian for the federal government, now retired. I asked him at dinner last night what the real story was on what trump was doing to the property of US taxpayers. he informed me of the national park service protocol for altering historical sites. courtesy of alt-nps.

Here’s how the process is supposed to work:
1. Initial Proposal: The White House is managed by the National Park Service (NPS) but used by the Executive Office of the President (EOP). Any proposed change, even by a sitting president, begins internally through the Office of the Curator and the White House Facilities Management Division.
2. Historic Review: The NPS, as custodian of the White House under the Presidential Residence Act and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), must review all alterations for compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. This requires assessing potential impacts on historic and cultural resources in consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and the D.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
3. Planning & Environmental Oversight: The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) evaluates all major federal projects in the National Capital Region, including work on the White House grounds, for design, planning, and environmental impacts under NEPA (the National Environmental Policy Act). Public comment and design reviews are part of that process.
4. Aesthetic Review: The U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) reviews and advises on the design and appearance of any exterior modifications to the White House or its grounds.
5. Final Authorization: After approvals from NPS, NCPC, and CFA, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the White House Chief Usher / Facilities Management Office finalize funding, scheduling, and logistics.
Only after completing this full process could any major construction or demolition legally begin.
Yet Trump ignored every step, acting unilaterally through executive order, bypassing oversight, and ordering demolition as if he were a monarch. The result: the people’s house, altered without the people’s consent.
More details:
Section 107, let’s talk about it.
The above process has always been the process taken, and here’s why.
Section 107 of the National Historic Preservation Act exempts the White House, the U.S. Capitol, and the Supreme Court from being legally required to go through the Act’s formal Section 106 review. In other words, the law doesn’t automatically force those branches to follow the same procedures as other federal buildings. That exemption exists only because each branch of government controls its own seat of power, it was never intended as a free pass to ignore preservation, planning, or environmental rules altogether.
In practice, every administration since the 1960s has followed the same review structure out of duty, accountability, and executive-branch policy. The White House is still federal property, managed by the National Park Service under the Presidential Residence Act and subject to Executive Order 11593, which requires federal agencies to protect and consult on historic resources. Major exterior or site work still triggers National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) and U.S. Commission of Fine Arts (CFA) design reviews, along with NEPA environmental assessments. Any project involving government resources must also comply with the Anti-Deficiency Act and federal ethics rules on funding and gifts.
So yes, Section 107 means the NHPA can’t force compliance, but presidents are still bound by a network of executive orders, planning statutes, environmental laws, and constitutional duties. That’s why the process described isn’t optional, it’s the framework that has always protected the people’s house from unilateral or politically motivated alteration.
These executive orders:
- Executive Order 11593 (1971) – Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment - Requires all federal agencies (including the Executive Office of the President) to “locate, inventory, and nominate to the National Register all properties under their control” and to consult with the Secretary of the Interior before altering historically significant structures. (Demolishing part of the White House without such consultation would conflict with this order.)
- Executive Order 12148 (1979), delegates emergency and historic property responsibilities to the Department of the Interior, reaffirming that federal agencies must protect historic resources even when exemptions exist.
.
.
why would trump attempt to get permission when he has a legion of morons willing to defend his actions?

 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @5.1.2    last year

So he broke protocol and acted unethically. Nothing new to see here

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
5.1.4  George  replied to  devangelical @5.1.2    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1.5  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @5.1.2    last year
a legion of morons willing to defend his actions ...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5    last year
The White House is about to be renamed.

The White Trump ? 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.2.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2    last year

The Trump Palace.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
5.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2    last year

The Gold Mansion.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @5.2.1    last year

pedophile palace ...

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
6  freepress    last year

There has been no mention of whether or not they removed the chandeliers, the many historic paintings and other pieces that have historical value. 

Taxpayer dollars may well be funding the destruction of the "People's House" and no information has been provided in a transparent fashion to the American people.

While Trump got some corporate sponsors and donations for the actual ballroom construction, there is no information about why they lied about preserving the East Wing and whether the taxpayers are paying for the demolition.

Did they preserve anything in the East Wing? After Republicans make a big deal about preserving our history like Confederate monuments, why are they silent about this?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  freepress @6    last year

Because it's their King and they never question the King

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
6.2  Thomas  replied to  freepress @6    last year
After Republicans make a big deal about preserving our history like Confederate monuments, why are they silent about this?

Doesn't that question answer itself??

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @6.2    last year

traitor heritage, traitor president ...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
20  Split Personality    last year

I realize that I come late to the party, but which part of the East Wing survived?

I think none, questioning the articles title...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
20.1  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @20    last year

... a bit late to issue a stop work order.

 
 

Who is online




68 visitors