You have a right to be transgender. You don’t have a right to expose yourself to women.
By: Dennis Prager
The degeneration of civil society brought to us by far left secularist democrats knows no bounds. On every issue they seek the lowest possible moral ground. Social issues are the worst. People who love America need to stand up and resist the excesses of the worshippers of reason and logic. A great creators article. Was going to seed from one source then found it at Real Clear Politics.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
You Have a Right to Be Transgender. You Don't Have a Right to Expose Yourself to Women.
How many examples could one give to show what a sick world left-wing activists, the media and the Democrats -- the left's political party -- have wrought? The number is equal to the number of policies they advocate.
There is no more obvious example than their position on the display of a penis in front of girls and women.
No issue -- with the possible exceptions of defunding police departments as murders increase and biological men competing in women's sports -- better reveals the moral and rational decline of an individual or institution. If anyone you care about defends a person's right to display their penis in front of a group of girls and women, my heart goes out to you. It is very painful to lose respect for a loved one.
Within the lifetime of even the youngest person reading this column, exposing the male organ to strangers, especially women and girls, was considered sick and criminal. Men who did it were arrested and charged with indecent exposure, and rightly so. In the span of a few years, thanks to the schools people still send their children to, and thanks to the media people still watch, listen to and read, exposing one's penis is to be considered wholesome and not only legal but a fundamental civil right.
A couple of weeks ago at a spa in Los Angeles, a biological man walked into a women's changing area completely naked. Needless to say, the girls and women were shocked to see this naked man, but thanks to progressive politicians in California, if a man says he is a woman, this individual can go to any place heretofore reserved to women.
Women's colleges, for example, must accept anyone who claims to be a woman. But to show how intellectually dishonest progressives and women's colleges are, if a female student at a women's college decides she is a man, she/he is allowed to remain a student there. Either they do not believe that a girl who transitions to a male is really a male or they no longer believe they are a women's college.
A Los Angeles Times editorial defending the right of the biological man to expose his penis to girls and women illustrates the intellectual and moral state of the left.
Take, for example, this sentence from the editorial:
"There is no doubt that Wi Spa did the right thing in defending the right of a transgender customer to be nude in the women's area, even though the sight of male-appearing genitalia discomfited at least one female customer, who complained at the front desk."
Note the Los Angeles Times' way of describing a penis: "male-appearing genitalia," not "male genitalia."
Regarding the discomfort of any of the girls or women at the spa, the Times editorial simply dismissed it: "No one has an absolute right to feel comfortable all the time." However, that is not the position of the Los Angeles Times or the rest of the left regarding transgender people. The left emphatically insists that trans people have an absolute right to feel comfortable all the time.
But they don't. A man who identifies as a woman yet retains male genitalia may have a legal right, but not a moral right, to display those genitalia in front of women.
A man who identifies as a man and exposes himself to a woman, let alone to a group of women and girls, is deemed sick and arrested. But, according to the left, a man who says he is a woman and does the exact same thing -- with the exact same disturbing effect on women, let alone girls -- is to be given universal support. In fact, however, this individual is the apotheosis of narcissism. And is still a man: As one woman pointed out to me, his engaging in such behavior is demonstrative proof that he is still a man (one with an exhibitionist streak). Women don't expose themselves like that.
Meanwhile, members of antifa, the closest thing America has to the Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth), attacked the woman who led the demonstration against the Wi Spa.
Such is the state of America and the West in the year 2021.
When the right of a man -- regardless of whether he identifies as a woman -- to expose his penis to girls supersedes society's obligation to protect girls' innocence and most women's sense of decency, we have reached a new low.
For those who believe that mankind inexorably heads in a moral direction, the left's attacks on Western culture, Western norms, freedom of speech, objective truth and Judeo-Christian values should serve as a disturbing wake-up call.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM
Tags
Who is online
102 visitors
I'll remember that when I'm open-carrying my .40 cal. Kahr and my 9mm Springfield XD9.
In Michigan, a person with a penis could be shot for walking around naked in a women's locker room or restroom.
Not legally I hope. I dont think indecent exposure is a capital offense in the U.S. yet.
I said COULD BE. I didn't say legally.
I feel the same way about violators of the establishment clause.
he won't be able to hand it over.
What? Who won't be able to hand over what?
Prager seems triggered again. One of his friends should reach out to him and explain what transgender means and how one goes about it. Or perhaps just put him on meds. He seems overly anxious about other people's penises.
You really think this kind of indecent behavior is acceptable?
This is not a normal behavior, transgender or not
Yes, because it's only Prager's trigger.
Banned Bud Light commercial because of nudity / suggestions of nudity, meaning no one actually sees a penis, vagina, or breasts:
My point being is that it's okay to ban a commercial for perceived nudity, but it's not okay that someone is pissed about a bio-male walking around naked in the presence of women and girls because they identify as a woman... where said women and girls actually see a penis and testicles.
Who banned it?
Who here is saying it's okay? WHAT I SAID was that transitioning isn't what Prager is telling us here. Just saying one identify as whatever doesn't make that person trans. It seems to be a prevailing idea among the anti-trans that this is a big issue. The only people I've heard of doing this were 2 or 3 straight anti-trans people pissed about bathroom bills a few years ago, trying to prove something. I believe they were arrested.
I always thought of transgender as someone getting ready to take the plunge into transsexual, but today's definition states otherwise.
The definition you posted is technically correct, but so basic as be negligent unless the reader takes in the whole part of "sense of personal identity" part. It's way more than stating one identifies as the opposite of their birth gender. Prager would have you believing that millions of horny liberals are parading around naked trolling for sex while claiming to identify as trans and congratulating themselves on fooling everyone.
I cannot believe I need to do this...
Is this a better definition?
I don't see how this is any clearer, but that's from a trans-equality site. Are businesses expected to ask and hear stories before allowing a person to go into a locker room?
You really don't.
Are we supposed to believe that there is an issue that needs addressing? From my LGBTQ friends the only issue is the bigoted bullshit propaganda put out by the likes of Prager.
It's a growing issue that needs to be addressed.
If anyone cares to read the Unruh factsheet that prompted this issue:
More articles regarding the subject matter posted here:
and one that points to it possibly being faked -
Stopped reading his bullshit right there.
The world is burning and flooding at record levels due to climate change, but penises!!!!!
I don't get why people are so terrified of the human body.
OMG I saw a boob! .. So what.
OMG I saw someone's ass .. So what.
If people would stop acting like simpleton puritans and stop acting like a body is something to be ashamed of we would be a lot better off.
Oh dear, I saw a penis .. So what...
Meanwhile Jeff Bezos launches himself into space in a giant dildo and it’s on every tv screen in the US.
That is exactly what it looked like.
Jon Stewart has a new vid out, I saw it on twitter. It was all about these billionaires wagging their dicks around and all shooting their rockets into space. It was hilarious.
I agree with your sentiment. Nudity has never bothered me. However, laws should be followed.
I just don't believe a lot of the bullshit. For all I know the guy could have been a plant and did it on purpose to start some kind of culture war.
From what I have seen and heard, a lot of trans people go to great lengths to hide their genitalia. I could not see them intentionally wagging things around.
I'm not arguing that part of it whatsoever. That's why I included that article link showing that it may be a falsified story.
I’m guessing that I may be the only one on this forum that has a trans family member. These discussions are offensively stupid so I generally don’t jump in and take a strong position. Fact is, I don’t understand it, my family struggles with trying to consciously call a family member by a different name than they have been going by their whole life, we struggle to refer to them as the opposite gender than they have been known as their whole life - but all we want is for them to be happy. It would be nice if those who wear a religious badge on their sleeve here were simply more interested in the happiness of their fellow human beings, rather than branding them as outcasts because they don’t understand the same things that I don’t understand.
You're not the only person here with a transgender family member. My cousin Morgan (formerly Lauren) is and quite frankly, no one seems to fully understand what happened in the last year that motivated them (uses them/they pronoun) to change their name and declare non-binary.
This article is something different however. The person referenced in the article exposed themselves to a woman and her underage daughter. Whether or not this person truly believes they are transgender or if the referenced person is just a perv and trying to find a loophole. I'm not here to debate that, because I don't really know. I am not a religious person. I don't have a personal problem with nudity. However... if my teen daughter and I were in a salon / spa and saw someone with cock and balls swinging, I'd be pretty pissed off; especially after finding out that the salon / spa allowed it based solely on the person exposing their self told them that they were transgender (M to F)... not transsexual [I know a few of those too], but simply claiming they are transgender.
There’s no getting around the fact that this case is clearly an outlier in the ocean of currently transgender reality we are all immersed in. Conservatives like to pretend that this case is the new norm - it clearly is not.
Like I said, I don’t get why anyone would want to subject themselves to this potential for prejudice and abuse, but that’s not for me to judge. It still subconsciously makes me cringe a little when I see it. I just got back from vacation, and when we checked in at the hotel I heard a booming male voice on the phone behind the counter. When I looked, the clerk next to the clerk serving us was on the phone, dressed as a female complete with hair, nails, and makeup. It was hard not to think how weird it was for this hotel to put that person in a position where they were the first and last employee that customers encounter. Still, to each their own I say. I hope they are happy with themselves.