When Parents Became the Enemy
By: Michael Brown
Parents have become the enemy of the deep state. We are opposing the perverse indoctrination of our kids. From perverting traditional values to changing the culture, to CRT, 1619 project, questionable literature and books, bio men in girls rooms, we are the resistance. A great way to improve the lives of our youth all across America is to send our kids to school with their Bibles. This day and meet me at the flag pole are two days a year to bring kids together be they public, private, home school students in order to express and share hope. As long as these events are student led, others can take part in them. This is important to combat the growing influence of militant secularism infecting our population like a pernicious disease inflicted upon our exceptional nation. Now the militant secularists and the bicoastal progressive elites are making us heartland parents enemies of the state.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
With all the ominous things taking place in America – and there are certainly quite a few – perhaps none is more ominous than this: Parents are being demonized. Moms and dads have become the enemy. It is now the government (or the education system) vs. those entrusted with raising the next generation. How on earth did this happen? We have certainly come a long way from the days of Father Knows Best – a very long way.
Back in the 1960s, when the generation gap grew large as a result of the counterculture revolution, young people viewed their parents as out of touch, out of step, and out of style. But that was the view of the kids, not the view of the state (or of “the system”). Parental authority remained firmly ensconced when it came to the education of their children.
But that authority has been increasingly challenged in recent decades, with schools hosting GSA (Gay Straight Alliance) clubs, where kids can “come out” to their peers, counselors, and teachers, without their parents knowing. Or where objectionable curricula can be taught at the teacher’s discretion, without parental notification, from K-12.
One mother told me that, without her or her husband’s knowledge, their 16-year-old daughter’s school was about to announce publicly that their daughter was now “he,” with a new name and a new set of pronouns. The parents only found out because they happened to meet with her daughter’s teachers the night before the announcement was planned, having been concerned about the negative influence the school was having on their daughter. How can this be? Who gave the public school system such rights?
Something has been brewing under the surface for some time now, and today, it has reached the boiling point. And the more that parents learn what is really going on, the more they are taking a stand. (For a recent, shocking example of gay porn in a school library, defended by the Library Director, something that is hardly uncommon, see here .)
The line must be drawn in the sand. If not now, then when?
Back in 2013, atheist biologist Richard Dawkins spoke out against parents “forcing” their religious beliefs on their children – in other words, he spoke out against raising them in the faith.
He said , “What a child should be taught is that religion exists; that some people believe this and some people believe that.”
Yes, he opined, “Forcing a religion on your children is as bad as child abuse.” And he added, “There is a value in teaching children about religion. You cannot really appreciate a lot of literature without knowing about religion. But we must not indoctrinate our children.”
He followed this up in an interview in 2015, speaking together with physicist Lawrence Krauss at Trinity College in Dublin.
As reported by the Independent, Dawkins “called on schools to protect children from being indoctrinated by their religious parents.”
In his words, “There is a balancing act and you have to balance the rights of parents and the rights of children and I think the balance has swung too far towards parents.” Really? The balance has swung too much towards parents?
He continued, “Children do need to be protected so that they can have a proper education and not be indoctrinated in whatever religion their parents happen to have been brought up in.”
Krauss, himself an atheist as well, agreed with Dawkins, saying, “That means parents have a limited — it seems to be — limited rights in determining what the curriculum is.”
In his view, “The state is providing the education, it’s trying to make sure all children have equal opportunity. And parents of course have concerns and a say, but they don’t have the right to shield their children from knowledge.”
Sorry about that, moms and dads. The state knows best. Stay out of the way!
And if some lawmakers in California have their way , you will be told to stay out of the way when it comes to your child’s own health, with children as young as 12 forced to receive the COVID-19 vaccination if they want to remain in school.
I ask again: how on earth did this happen?
Perhaps more shocking still was the recent announcement from the Department of Justice that parents who spoke against their school’s attempt to indoctrinate their children with radical race ideology could be viewed as “domestic terrorists” guilty of “hate speech.” This was now a matter for the FBI.
As expressed by Matt Walsh, “Leftist activists can come to your house with bullhorns. Film you in the bathroom. Loot your business. Burn police stations. The FBI does nothing.
“But if conservative parents raise their voices at a school board meeting, they’re hunted down as terrorists.
“The law is dead.”
As for those parents who actually made threats against school board members, administrators, or teachers, something that is unacceptable and unjustifiable, why is this a matter for the FBI? And how on earth does this make these overzealous parents “domestic terrorists”?
The bad news is that things are going from bad to worse.
The good news is that, with tens of millions of parents in America, we can say no to these radical and destructive ideas. That doesn’t mean with threats of violence or intimidation, God forbid. But it does mean taking principled stands. And if enough parents will stand strong, others will follow.
Patrick Henry once said, “For good or for ill, the estate of the family will most assuredly predetermine the estate of all of the rest of the culture.”
Let’s resist this current attack on our families as if the future of our culture depended on it. It does.
Tags
Who is online
70 visitors
can you find all the child molesters in the above bible school photo?
There aren’t any. And it’s a public school not a Bible school.
as usual, you're wrong. left click on the picture's properties. I accept your apology in advance.
I see nothing. So no apology. Even if it were a private school it still wouldn’t be a “Bible” school. Those happen in summer time.
It's nice they're still allowed to do that.
Indeed it is. They will have to continue their assault on the 1st amendment to take this away from us.
Can anyone bring a Torah or a Q'oran, or should they just not be included as "good" Americans?
Or is it necessary for it to refer to "Christ" Jesus?
I’m sure that they could bring them if they like. It’s a free country with freedom of religion.
Why would feel constrained from referring to their source of salvation?
I don't think that either Jews or Muslims would even think of the word "salvation" - for me it means that "army" that stands on the street peaching to "save souls". "Follow the fold."
Both have belief in Heaven and an afterlife although even in the time of Jesus Jews were divided on that subject.
No surprise that Jews were divided then. Ari Ben Canaan, played by Paul Newman in the movie Exodus when speaking with Major Caldwell, played by Peter Lawford, said "Put 2 Jews together you've got an argument, and 3, a revolution."
So what you are trying to say is that if religion were allowed in schools there would be no violence? If so, how do you explain the shootings in churches, synagogues and mosques?
Religion should not initiate any message or prayer in schools and neither should staff at a school. It should always be initiated by the students or outsiders they bring in to speak to them. There has been more bad things happening at public schools since 1962. This is why parents must be directly involved in their kids education and schools.
You mean the anti-maskers causing violence at school board meetings?
Whether it’s anti mask or anti CRT or anti 1619 or anti bio males in the girls restrooms there has been virtually no violence at school board meetings.
Anti-Maskers Are Assaulting Teachers and School Leaders. What Can Be Done?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti -masker attacks parent at Minnesota school board ...
Sep 29, 2021 · Security has been beefed up at school board meetings in Eastern Carver County, Minnesota, after a September 27 meeting turned violent .Video footage shows a parent , later identified as Jonas Sjoberg, being attacked by another unmasked person after he praised the board 's decision to continue implementing a mask mandate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hawley defends violent anti-mask protesters as FBI ...
https://americanindependent.com/josh-hawley-lisa.."> .. .
.
Oct 05, 2021 · School board officials and teachers have faced threats and have even been attacked by parents , including in Hawley's own state of Missouri. In September, scuffles broke out after a meeting in Pleasant Hill, Missouri, at which the school board voted unanimously in favor of a mask mandate, with at least one parent led away in handcuffs.. Also in September, NBC News reported that three men, …
No violence at school board meetings?..
Tell me about it Buzz. What I saw at our school board meeting was the anti maskers getting their kids up there to literally yell at the school board. Whatever happened to teaching your kids to respect adults?
I also saw parents threatening the board, telling them they know where the school board members live, and that they were going to be personally sued. They were ill-behaved and nasty. There is footage of this (sadly we made the news) but now it is all on youtube.
btw, our school does not teach CRT, or 1619 project and no Long Island schools do, so I don't think this is an endemic issue.
Watch her must-see rant below:
This iframe is not allowed
I posted examples of actual physical violence to negate XXJ's unbelievable claim that their is no violence at school board meetings, but there are pages on the internet of ugly threats examples. What is wrong with those people? There appears to be a decline in civility in the USA.
Real violence or threats of it are rare and are ably dealt with locally by local law enforcement. There is no need to bring in federal law enforcement agencies to a local matter. I think many school boards and local teachers unions fear the local police will too often side with the parents.
I'm just sad to see these kinds of things happen, things that have not happened until recently during my lifetime, making me feel that humanity is not just heading back to the middle ages, but to the Neanderthals.
That is where the far left takes society.
From what I've observed, it's not the far left that's been trying to time-travel America back to the past, but the far left has been pushing too hard and that could cause the reaction.
The people were expecting a moderate bi partisan government with biden and a 50-50 senate and the closest balance in the House in decades and got anything but that.