Trump has made America less racist
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
The election of Donald Trump has, of course, unleashed the latent racist which lurks within millions of Americans. We know this because enlightened opinion keeps telling us so. The New Yorker , for example, ran a piece in November 2016 declaring ‘Hate on rise since Trump’s election’, and quoting a list of incidents collected by the Southern Poverty Law Center – including the experience of a girl in Colorado who was allegedly told by a white man: ‘Now that Trump is president I am going to shoot you and all the blacks I can find’. TIME magazine , too, ran a story in the same month announcing ‘Racist incidents are up since Donald Trump’s election’. In March 2017 the Nation asserted ‘Donald Trump’s rise has coincided with an explosion in hate groups’, claiming that 100 racist organizations had been founded since Trump began his presidential campaign.
And so it goes on. Just as with Britain’s vote for Brexit, Trump’s strident language and his concentration on issues such as migration is supposed to have coarsened political discourse – legitimizing racist and xenophobic opinions in people who might otherwise have been shamed into silence. By this narrative, even slightly immoderate speeches, posters and campaigns by politicians become magnified through the lens of public opinion into something much more sinister. A speech on migration, goes the theory, can all too easily erupt into bar room arguments and end with a Muslim or a black man having his head kicked in.
It sounds vaguely plausible, but is it true? Not if a new paper by a pair of sociologists at the University of Pennsylvania is anything to go by. Daniel J. Hopkins and Samantha Washington set out to measure the effect of Trump’s election on anti-black and anti-Hispanic prejudice, using a randomly-selected panel of 2,500 Americans whose changing opinions have been under study since 2008. The academics report that they had been expecting to measure a rise in racist opinions, writing: ‘The normalization of prejudice or opinion leadership both lead us to expect that expressed prejudice may have increased in this period, especially among Republicans or Trump supporters’. They had been led to expect this, they say, through an extensive reading of recent literature in social sciences which, they say, supports the notion that racist attitudes lie dormant inside many people, waiting to be triggered by certain events – of which the election of Donald Trump might be one. There could, after all, hardly be anything more calculated to awaken an incipient racist than the president calling Mexicans a bunch of rapists.
Yet the study found exactly the opposite. Americans, claim Hopkins and Washington, have actually become less inclined to express racist opinions since Donald Trump was elected. Anti-black prejudice, they found, declined by a statistically-insignificant degree between 2012 and 2016, when Trump was elected. But then after 2016 it took a sharp dive that was statistically significant. Moreover, contrary to their expectations, the fall was as evident among Republican voters as it was among Democrats. There was also a general fall in anti-Hispanic prejudice, too, although this was more evident among Democrat voters.
It is a similar story to that in Britain, where the attempt to link Brexit with rising xenophobia has been somewhat debunked. A murder of a Polish man in the town of Harlow in August 2016 was widely attributed to Brexit – but eventually declared by police not to have been a hate crime at all. Similarly, a smashed window in a Spanish restaurant in South London on the night of the Brexit vote was initially widely reported to be an expression of euphoria on the part of xenophobes – but was later revealed to be an attempted burglary.
So has Trump actually been a good thing for race relations in the US, and if so, why? The University of Pennsylvania study is a little shy on this point, but raises the theory that people have found Trump’s pronouncements on migrants, Mexicans and so on to be so reprehensible that it has inspired them to think about their own attitudes. It is possible, they write ‘that Trump’s rhetoric clarified anti-racist norms….given that the declines in prejudice appear concentrated in the period after Trump’s election, it seems quite plausible that it was not simply Trump’s rhetoric but also his accession to the presidency that pushed public opinion in the opposite direction’.
Well, maybe. It might be added that the election of Barack Obama also caught liberal opinion unawares. That event, it might be recalled, was supposed to be the breakthrough which led to a kinder, gentler America. Instead it seemed to be followed by a more fractious period in race relations, culminating in race riots in Ferguson, Mo., in 2014. Maybe social science has got it the wrong way round: it was the sight of a mixed race man in the White House who brought out in the inner racist in Americans who are inclined towards those feelings, while the reassuring sight of white man back in the Oval Office has calmed them down.
Ross Clark
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Tags
Who is online
237 visitors
"Anti-black and anti-Hispanic prejudice has declined since 2016, new study shows"
Trump did it again!
Really?
Absolutely. Here in Ohio, Dayton to be exact, we're having a Ku Klux Klan rally to celebrate Memorial Day this weekend.
Only clean, pressed sheets are permitted to march.
It is happening. Our local news is covering it. Local police are worried about security. We shall see.
I am sure it will be fine. Food trucks and hot dog vendors will be plying their trade.
The last sentence of this piece is very telling.
So has Trump actually been a good thing for race relations in the US, and if so, why? The University of Pennsylvania study is a little shy on this point, but raises the theory that people have found Trump’s pronouncements on migrants, Mexicans and so on to be so reprehensible that it has inspired them to think about their own attitudes.
As ridiculous as it seems, this might be Trump's only worthwhile legacy.
Well, Sister, you raise an interesting question.
"has Trump actually been a good thing for race relations in the US, and if so, why? "
I'm sure that everyone might like to take a shot at answering that one, but my own take on it is that the election of Donald Trump was a repudiation of progressive ideology. Sort of a return to normalcy. An easing of racial tensions. While President Obama was having members of black lives matter over to the White House, giving their false narrative credibility as cops were being murdered, Trump, on the other hand, brought back respect for the police. While Obama had some knee jerk reaction to every racial incident, Trump felt no reason for a US President to comment on local incidents. While Eric Holder investigated Police Departments and issued consent decrees, Jeff Sessions and William Barr prosecuted criminals.
Just my opinion.
As ridiculous as it seems, this might be Trump's only worthwhile legacy.
Nope, Trump's legacy will be a thriving economy, the restoration of fair trade and the resurrection of a fair and responsible Judicial system.
Well of course, Obama the divider is gone.
This article is rather vague, so all anyone can really do is make suppositions. From what I understand from reading it is that a "random panel" of 2500 Americans was monitored over a period of years for expressions of anti-black or anti-Hispanic sentiment. In polling , a good poll has people from varied age groups, a balance of men and women, different races and different political factions. The article doesn't say if that approach was used here, or if they randomly chose white people to study, which would seem to be the source of anti black and anti Hispanic racism.
In any case , this is the money shot of the article
These passages rather clearly conjecture that Trump had nothing POSITIVE to do with the proposed lowering of racist expression, but rather that he was seen by people as so odious it made them look in their own mirror to make sure they were not complying with Trump's behavior.
We see right wingers on this article praising Trump, which seems incredibly silly in this context.
Trump is very unpopular. It somewhat follows that at least some people in that majority would see that emulating Trump was not a good idea even if when Obama was president they had a different opinion.
I think the whole premise here is pretty vague though.
If you look at the passage you highlighted, you see the mention of the Ferguson riots, which were happened during Obama's time. Do you recall what initiated those riots? Let me refresh your memory. It was a LIE that Michael Brown was surrendering to police when he was shot. In reality, Brown was struggling to get hold of a police officer's gun. Eric Holder investigated the incident and was disappointed to discover the truth and after admitting to the truth, was left with claiming that the Ferguson Police gave out more traffic violations to minorities than to whites. To add further insult to injury, President Obama invited the group which had it's beginnings out of the Ferguson incident, black lives matter , to the White House. Remember their slogan "Hands up, don't shoot" ? Also a LIE! Obama gave that group credibility and he gave the lie a life. Cops were targeted and murdered!
That was but one incident from the Obama years. I think we can logically conclude that Trump was a return to normalcy.
Trump is very unpopular.
John, Trump's approval numbers are actually better than Obama's were at this point in Obama's first term.