Leftist Mob Shows Up At Tucker Carlson's Home: 'You Are Not Safe'

Via:  heartland-american  •  2 weeks ago  •  238 comments

 Leftist Mob Shows Up At Tucker Carlson's Home: 'You Are Not Safe'
"'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!' This is what we think of your racist rhetoric and fearmongering toward immigrants," reads another tweet's caption. “No borders! No walls! No USA at all!”

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


On Wednesday night, a leftist mob showed up at Fox News host Tucker Carlson's Washington, D.C. home while he was on-air taping his show, "Tucker Carlson Tonight." In the video posted to social media by leftist group "Smash Racism DC," the angry mob outside Carlson's home chanted that they will "fight" him and demanded he leave town.

Carlson has a wife and four children.

"Activists ring doorbell, hold protest at the Washington DC area home of [Tucker Carlson], racist, sexist, bigoted FOX News personality. So far no one has opened the door," says a caption to one of the videos. "Tucker Carlson, we will fight! We know where you sleep at night!" ​

"We are outside your home to protest against your fascism and racism," the mob can be heard saying in the video.

"Tucker Carlson, we will fight, we know where you sleep at night!" they chant in unison.

Another caption from the group says, "'Racist scumbag, leave town!' Every night you spread fear into our homes—fear of the other, fear of us, and fear of them. Each night you tell us we are not safe. Tonight you're reminded that we have a voice. Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either."

"Racist scumbag, leave town," the group chants.




“Racist scumbag, leave town!”

Every night you spread fear into our homes—fear of the other, fear of us, and fear of them. Each night you tell us we are not safe. Tonight you’re reminded that we have a voice. Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either.#KnockKnockTuckerpic.twitter.com/QlNVKS4oxN
— Smash Racism DC (@SmashRacismDC) November 7, 2018



"'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!' This is what we think of your racist rhetoric and fearmongering toward immigrants," reads another tweet's caption.

"You can’t hide from those you hurt, Tucker," said Smash Racism DC.

Carlson, who was apparently on-air while his home was targeted, did not make direct reference to the attack during Wednesday's show. But he did reference angry mobs "scaring your children" to a guest, seemingly in veiled connection to the mob reportedly at his home.

When Carlson signed off his show, he said he will be taking the next two days off. "I'll see you Monday," he told viewers.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
MBFC really sucks
1  seeder  MBFC really sucks    2 weeks ago

“In the video posted to social media by leftist group "Smash Racism DC," the angry mob outside Carlson's home chanted that they will "fight" him and demanded he leave town.

Carlson has a wife and four children.

"Activists ring doorbell, hold protest at the Washington DC area home of [Tucker Carlson], racist, sexist, bigoted FOX News personality. So far no one has opened the door," says a caption to one of the videos. "Tucker Carlson, we will fight! We know where you sleep at night!" ​

 
 
Tessylo
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  MBFC really sucks @1    2 weeks ago
'Carlson has a wife and four children.'

Really?  I thought he was a swish.  

 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.1  gooseisgone  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    2 weeks ago

Maybe you should do a google search before you make derogatory comments. 

 
 
Tessylo
1.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.1    2 weeks ago

He could still be a deep in the closet swish.  

Having a wife and four children has absolutely nothing to do with anything.  

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.1    2 weeks ago

Isn't it rather strange that the homophobic comments on here most often come from progressives?

 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.4  gooseisgone  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.2    2 weeks ago
Having a wife and four children has absolutely nothing to do with anything

Guess you missed the part about making derogatory comments.

 
 
Tessylo
1.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    2 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
Tacos!
1.1.6  Tacos!  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    2 weeks ago

Just another example of how their self-proclaimed tolerance and respect for all people is not genuine, but just a political tactic. If the politics of a person don't line up with them, their go-to is to attack them based on some immutable characteristic.

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.7  Texan1211  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.6    2 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.6    2 weeks ago

jrSmiley_12_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
WallyW
1.1.9  WallyW  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.2    one week ago

Rumor has it that Obama regularly had the Secret Service sneak him out of the WH and stand guard will he visited gay bathhouses in DC.

 
 
Tessylo
1.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.7    one week ago

'The hypocrisy is thick with some!'

It always is!

 
 
Tessylo
1.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  WallyW @1.1.9    one week ago

[Removed]

 
 
MonsterMash
1.1.13  MonsterMash  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    one week ago
I thought he was a swish

Tessy, Carlson works for Fox you have him mixed up with CNN's Don Lemon or Anderson Cooper, they're the swishes.

 
 
Don Overton
1.1.14  Don Overton  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    one week ago

[Removed

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  Don Overton @1.1.14    one week ago

I guess it IS a little hard for some to read these posts nd determine who made any comments about being homosexual, and in such a way as to be disparaging.

Not for all of us, thank God!

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.16  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.10    one week ago

Yeah, I don't go around chastising others for making homophobic comments and then make them myself.

In fact, no one on here or anywhere else can quote me ever making a homophobic comment or referring to homosexuals as swishes or anything other than what they are.

 
 
GregTx
1.1.17  GregTx  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.16    one week ago

Pshaw, if calling someone an Uncle Tom isn't racist then how can swish be homophonic?/s

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @1.1.17    one week ago

Good one!

We all know if a conservative dared to call a homosexual (or even a person we merely SUSPECT is a homosexual) all hell would break loose and that person would most likely be referred to the SPLC for uttering those hateful words!

 
 
GregTx
1.1.19  GregTx  replied to  GregTx @1.1.17    one week ago

[deleted]

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.20  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @1.1.19    one week ago

LOL!

 
 
epistte
1.1.21  epistte  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.1    one week ago
Maybe you should do a google search before you make derogatory comments. 

Does the term "beard" mean anything to you?

 
 
Cerenkov
1.1.22  Cerenkov  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.2    one week ago

Homophobic comment. Sad.

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.23  Texan1211  replied to  Cerenkov @1.1.22    one week ago

jrSmiley_7_smiley_image.png

it is only homophobic if a conservative says it.

LMAO!

 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.25  gooseisgone  replied to  epistte @1.1.21    one week ago
Does the term "beard" mean anything to you? 

f you want to put it into a sentence I will respond, unless you are just fishing.

 
 
epistte
1.1.27  epistte  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.25    one week ago
If you want to put it into a sentence I will respond, unless you are just fishing.

Urban Dictionary has your answer.

Beard is a slang term describing a person who is used, knowingly or unknowingly, as a date, romantic partner (boyfriend or girlfriend), or spouse either to conceal infidelity or to conceal one's sexual orientation. The American slang term originally referred to anyone who acted on behalf of another, in any transaction, to conceal a person's true identity. The term can be used in heterosexual and homosexual contexts, but is especially used within LGBT culture. References to beards are seen in mainstream television and films, and other entertainment.

 
 
epistte
1.1.28  epistte  replied to    one week ago
It's fishing. A bite is a ticket.

You're wrong, again.

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.29  Texan1211  replied to    one week ago

It is all bullshit. Don't let them reel you in!

 
 
Don Overton
1.1.31  Don Overton  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.16    one week ago

You just did make such a comment

 
 
Don Overton
1.1.32  Don Overton  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    one week ago

Only when calling out homophobic comments

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.33  Texan1211  replied to  Don Overton @1.1.32    one week ago

Okay, let's play!

You first:

Show me any homophobic comments in this thread, without regard to who made them.

When you can honestly do that, we'll talk.

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.34  Texan1211  replied to  Don Overton @1.1.31    one week ago

That is not factual.

Perhaps for once you could PROVE something instead of merely bleating about it?

Give it a shot!

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.1.35  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.34    one week ago

I wouldn’t count on anything but crickets 🦗 coming from whom you address.  

 
 
Texan1211
1.1.36  Texan1211  replied to  MBFC really sucks @1.1.35    one week ago

Yeah, I don't.

That would be insane--expecting different results!

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.1.37  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.6    one week ago

So very well said and the bottom line.  It’s almost sad watching the other side defend, rationalize, and make excuses for the mob at Carlson’s house.  Oh and then all the whataboutisms they use. jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.38  gooseisgone  replied to  epistte @1.1.27    one week ago

Ok.........do you have a point or is this an Urban Dictionary quiz.

 
 
Eagle Averro
1.1.39  Eagle Averro  replied to  epistte @1.1.27    one week ago
but is especially used within LGBT culture. References to beards are seen in mainstream television and films, and other entertainment

E.A See here also about the " Power of Minorities and Language "  ::

Description

A Lot of talk about " Hate Speech " and here we see a fine example of how a Minority is forcing its opinion and " language " and doing so in a very detrimental way to Society and the way it needs to function!

 
 
epistte
1.1.40  epistte  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.38    6 days ago

Ok.........do you have a point or is this an Urban Dictionary quiz.

You made an issue of the word "beard" in 1.1.25. I defined the word for you.

 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.41  gooseisgone  replied to  epistte @1.1.40    6 days ago
You made an issue of the word "beard"

You do realize.......... "you".......... brought up the term "beard" (1.1.21).  If you have an issue with it look in the mirror!

 
 
Greg Jones
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  MBFC really sucks @1    2 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
A. Macarthur
1.2.1  A. Macarthur  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    one week ago
Democrat "leaders", if there is such a thing, need to calm down their thuggish mob. Who knows, people with pitchforks and torches might just start showing up at their doors. Such behavior has become standard for the loony left.
Already happened in Charlottesvile … the looney Neo-Nazi far right; too bad the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising victims didn't have a "thuggish" "looney left mob" to save them from their Nazi assailant/murderers/anti-semite motherfuckers!
The lack of historical perspective and Jess Willard rhetoric gets really sickening herein.

For the record … IMO, NO ONE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF/AT A PRIVATE RESIDENCE.

In watching the video, maybe I missed it … I did not see any footage of the "mob" itself, and, from the audio, it sounded like something far smaller than a "mob" … still, they should not have gone there.

 
 
MonsterMash
1.2.2  MonsterMash  replied to  A. Macarthur @1.2.1    one week ago
In watching the video, maybe I missed it … I did not see any footage of the "mob" itself
You must have selective eye sight Mac, here ya go.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/11/08/protesters_mob_outside_tucker_carlsons_house_call_him_racist_scumbag.html

 
 
Don Overton
1.2.4  Don Overton  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    one week ago

Talk about mobs  4d936ba1ccd1d56d33710000-750.jpg

 
 
Don Overton
1.2.5  Don Overton  replied to  MonsterMash @1.2.2    one week ago

[No value

 
 
A. Macarthur
1.2.6  A. Macarthur  replied to    one week ago

Perhaps if you turn your monitor on? Then lighten it?

Did that … there are silhouettes visible but no definitive indication of the number of participants, nor, anything definitive that identifies them as ANTIFA.

But continue to offer your helpful advice.

 
 
A. Macarthur
1.2.7  A. Macarthur  replied to  Don Overton @1.2.4    one week ago

[deleted]

 
 
A. Macarthur
1.2.8  A. Macarthur  replied to  MonsterMash @1.2.2    one week ago

[deleted]

 
 
GregTx
1.2.9  GregTx  replied to  A. Macarthur @1.2.8    one week ago

How many do you think it would need to be considered a mob if they showed up on your front lawn then beat on your front door to point of damaging it while chanting thinly veiled threats and demanding you leave your home?

 
 
epistte
1.2.11  epistte  replied to  GregTx @1.2.9    one week ago
How many do you think it would need to be considered a mob if they showed up on your front lawn then beat on your front door to point of damaging it while chanting thinly veiled threats and demanding you leave your home?

I'd bake cookies and make a pot of coffee.

 
 
Texan1211
1.2.12  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @1.2.9    one week ago

Hey, if the targeted person is remotely conservative, it is all fair game to most progressives.

 
 
GregTx
1.2.13  GregTx  replied to  epistte @1.2.11    one week ago

I would assume that you are well armed then.☺ 

 
 
epistte
1.2.14  epistte  replied to  GregTx @1.2.13    one week ago
I would assume that you are well armed then.☺ 

I'm not always afraid of other people, so why would I need a gun?  

 
 
GregTx
1.2.15  GregTx  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.12    one week ago

But that's a slippery slope, at some point using partisan reasoning, everyone becomes fair game.

 
 
GregTx
1.2.16  GregTx  replied to  epistte @1.2.14    one week ago

Are you saying that you would just have cookies and coffee when there are people threatening you, beating on your front door?

 
 
Texan1211
1.2.17  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @1.2.16    one week ago

Not really believable, is it?

 
 
GregTx
1.2.19  GregTx  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.17    one week ago

No, not at all.

 
 
epistte
1.2.20  epistte  replied to    one week ago
"I'd bake cookies and make a pot of coffee." Those people take their pot in their cookies.

Recreational pot isn't yet legal in this state, but if they are willing to share an ounce, I'll happily bake the weed cookies. 

 
 
epistte
1.2.21  epistte  replied to  GregTx @1.2.16    one week ago
Are you saying that you would just have cookies and coffee when there are people threatening you, beating on your front door?

You seem to think that the world is a very scary place to be feared.

 
 
A. Macarthur
1.2.22  A. Macarthur  replied to  GregTx @1.2.9    one week ago

I repudiated the action twice in this thread; if you have followed the discussion, you would know I disagree with the demonstration.

 
 
GregTx
1.2.23  GregTx  replied to  epistte @1.2.21    one week ago

Not at all, it's only as scary as you allow it to be.

 
 
MrFrost
1.2.24  MrFrost  replied to  epistte @1.2.20    one week ago
Recreational pot isn't yet legal in this state, but if they are willing to share an ounce, I'll happily bake the weed cookies. 

It's legal here, come on over. :)

 
 
epistte
1.2.25  epistte  replied to  MrFrost @1.2.24    one week ago
It's legal here, come on over.

CBD oil is contested in Ohio, even though there is no THC in it. I'll send you $50.00 for a bottle.

 
 
gooseisgone
1.2.26  gooseisgone  replied to  A. Macarthur @1.2.22    one week ago
 you would know I disagree with the demonstration

But you questioned if it was a "mob" or if it was "Antifa".

 
 
epistte
1.2.27  epistte  replied to  gooseisgone @1.2.26    one week ago
But you questioned if it was a "mob" or if it was "Antifa".

$5.00 says that it was the work of Black Bloc anarchists. The Antifa would not spraypaint Anarchist logos as graffiti. 

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.2.28  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.12    one week ago

So it would seem.  jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
Greg Jones
1.2.29  Greg Jones  replied to  A. Macarthur @1.2.1    one week ago

So you're saying it never happened to Carlson family, and that such harassment and threats are OK unless it happens to a liberal? [deleted]

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.2.30  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2.29    one week ago

So it would seem in my opinion.  

 
 
gooseisgone
1.2.31  gooseisgone  replied to  epistte @1.2.27    one week ago
$5.00 says that it was the work of Black Bloc anarchists

Give yourself $5.00 because no one cares.

 
 
epistte
1.2.32  epistte  replied to  gooseisgone @1.2.31    6 days ago
Give yourself $5.00 because no one cares.

Don't confuse the Antifa with the Black Bloc. They seek very different goals and have different targets. 

 
 
Jack_TX
1.2.33  Jack_TX  replied to  epistte @1.2.32    6 days ago
Don't confuse the Antifa with the Black Bloc. They seek very different goals and have different targets. 

The implication that I need to keep a scorecard to somehow differentiate between various leftist terrorist groups lends them more legitimacy than I care to offer.

As a gesture of bipartisanship, I refuse to track Neo-Nazi groups also.

 
 
epistte
1.2.34  epistte  replied to  Jack_TX @1.2.33    6 days ago
The implication that I need to keep a scorecard to somehow differentiate between various leftist terrorist groups lends them more legitimacy than I care to offer.

[Deleted]

As a gesture of bipartisanship, I refuse to track Neo-Nazi groups also.

The Neo-Nazis are on the rise with Trump's political popularity.

 
 
Texan1211
1.2.35  Texan1211  replied to  Jack_TX @1.2.33    6 days ago

Isn't it just so much easier to recognize loons as loons, without having to think which party they belong to?

Especially when they make up such a small segment of the population?

No real, thinking person should confuse a handful of loons with a political party in America.

 
 
Jack_TX
1.2.36  Jack_TX  replied to  epistte @1.2.34    6 days ago

I'm trying to imagine what I might have said that would have set you off enough to violate the COC.  Wow.

The Neo-Nazis are on the rise with Trump's political popularity

Are they?  Or are reports of Neo-Nazis on the rise.  Two different things.  I'd be interested to see actual impartial statistics.

In any case, I don't care about these people, so I don't keep track of who hates for what team.  

 
 
Jack_TX
1.2.37  Jack_TX  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.35    6 days ago
Especially when they make up such a small segment of the population?

Microscopic.  Like...electron microscope microscopic.

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.2.38  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.35    6 days ago

Exactly, which is why the SPLC is destroying its original mission of going after real and violent hate groups by targeting, defaming, slandering, and libeling people just like me who run mainstream conservative groups I identify with.  

 
 
gooseisgone
1.2.39  gooseisgone  replied to  epistte @1.2.32    6 days ago
Don't confuse the Antifa with the Black Bloc.

Why, neither group has any value when it comes to our Democracy.

 
 
epistte
1.2.40  epistte  replied to  gooseisgone @1.2.39    5 days ago
Why, neither group has any value when it comes to our Democracy.

1.) We don't live in a democracy. The US is a constitutional republic. 

2.) Those groups are free to exist because of our freedom of speech and freedom of association. They do not have to prove their social worth in order to exist. When they commit crimes their members can be arrested for their acts.  

 
 
Don Overton
1.3  Don Overton  replied to  MBFC really sucks @1    one week ago

Just what he deserves

 
 
Cerenkov
1.3.1  Cerenkov  replied to  Don Overton @1.3    one week ago

Another comment in support of leftist terrorists. 

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.3.2  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Don Overton @1.3    one week ago

Why is it that he deserves a mob at his front door frightening his wife while he’s at work?  

 
 
Texan1211
1.3.3  Texan1211  replied to  MBFC really sucks @1.3.2    one week ago

He doesn't.

It is the way with some progressives, though--threats and bully tactics!

 
 
Don Overton
1.3.4  Don Overton  replied to  MBFC really sucks @1.3.2    one week ago

So it's not ok with you to tell a racist he's a racist, so it's ok with you to tell a neo nazi, he's a nazi, so it's ok with you to tell a liar he's a liar.  Got it.  Typical Trump with the ugly trump mob

 
 
MBFC really sucks
1.3.5  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Don Overton @1.3.4    one week ago

Tucker Carlson is none of those things you mentioned.  He’s a conservative well within the mainstream of American political discourse.  There is absolutely no justification whatsoever for what happened at his home.  No excuse, no rationalization.  Just simply wrong.  

 
 
Jack_TX
1.3.6  Jack_TX  replied to  Don Overton @1.3.4    6 days ago
So it's not ok with you to tell a racist he's a racist,

There is little evidence he's a racist. 

Even if he were, it's fucking not OK to go beat on his door and scare his wife. 

 
 
Tacos!
2  Tacos!    2 weeks ago

What a bunch of lunatics! What is wrong with people?

demanded he leave town

Leave the "town" of Washington D.C.? ROFL. Seriously? Who do you think you are? Where do you think are? Leave town? What century do you think this is?

We know where you sleep at night!" ​

But don't call them an angry mob. That's rude. Threatening someone is cool, but identifying a group of angry, threatening people as a mob is beyond the pale. Cue Brooke Baldwin.

Each night you tell us we are not safe.

If by "we" you mean illegal aliens, well, theoretically, you could be deported at any time, but is that "not safe?" If that's what you mean, Tucker doesn't do that; the law does that.

 
 
Don Overton
2.1  Don Overton  replied to  Tacos! @2    one week ago

[Removed

 
 
Texan1211
2.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Don Overton @2.1    one week ago

[Comment deleted due to context]

 
 
Tacos!
3  Tacos!    2 weeks ago
"'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!'

I want someone to defend this shit. If this is really what you think, you shouldn't be in this country, and I frankly don't understand why you would want to be here anyway. 

 
 
MBFC really sucks
3.1  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Tacos! @3    6 days ago

They believe it yet won’t defend it.  So typical. 

 
 
Tacos!
3.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  MBFC really sucks @3.1    6 days ago
They believe it yet won’t defend it.  So typical.

They operate like this on a number of issues. They do everything they can to encourage and then ignore illegal immigration, but when pressed they claim "no one is advocating open borders."

Similarly, they pursue every policy they can to make it extremely difficult or impossible for law abiding to citizens to procure, own, and use firearms, but then they claim "no is talking about repealing the 2nd amendment. If you think we want someone to come take your guns, you're just paranoid."

It's like gaslighting is a plank of the Democratic Party platform.

 
 
MBFC really sucks
3.1.2  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Tacos! @3.1.1    6 days ago

Because it is!  

 
 
Krishna
4  Krishna    2 weeks ago

There's an old saying:

What goes around comes around!

 
 
Vic Eldred
4.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Krishna @4    2 weeks ago

When?  Should I organize a group in Brookline?

 
 
MBFC really sucks
4.2  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Krishna @4    2 weeks ago

Really?  When have conservative mobs gone to a liberal personality’s home and threatened them and their family?   What a weak attempt to justify the behavior of a liberal mob.  

 
 
Jack_TX
4.2.1  Jack_TX  replied to  MBFC really sucks @4.2    one week ago

Heartland..... Tacos....  You're missing the issue entirely.

For conservatives, politics is a set of beliefs about how the country should run.

For "progressives", it's a religion.  It's how they decide good from evil, righteous people from unrighteous, and believers from infidels.  There is no behavior against the infidels that they consider to be out of bounds or off limits.   Most of them see nothing wrong with this, and those that do will attempt to defend it anyway.....because......religion.

 
 
Don Overton
4.2.2  Don Overton  replied to  Jack_TX @4.2.1    one week ago

[Removed]

 
 
Studiusbagus
4.2.3  Studiusbagus  replied to  MBFC really sucks @4.2    one week ago
When have conservative mobs gone to a liberal personality’s home and threatened them and their family?

Nah, the new trend is mailing bombs, working or not, planning to bomb a whole apartment complex of Somalians, or walking in a non-Christian or minority house of worship and killing the congregation.

 
 
Greg Jones
4.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Krishna @4    2 weeks ago

Where's your moral compass?

 
 
Don Overton
4.3.1  Don Overton  replied to  Greg Jones @4.3    one week ago

[deleted]

 
 
Sparty On
4.3.2  Sparty On  replied to  Greg Jones @4.3    one week ago

Many folks moral compasses work about as good a real compass does at the North Pole .....

 
 
Tacos!
4.4  Tacos!  replied to  Krishna @4    2 weeks ago
What goes around comes around!

When was Tucker Carlson camped outside someone's house with a mob demanding they leave town and threatening "we know where you sleep at night?"

 
 
Don Overton
4.4.1  Don Overton  replied to  Tacos! @4.4    one week ago

No but he does have his mob threaten others.   [Removed]

 
 
Tacos!
4.4.2  Tacos!  replied to  Don Overton @4.4.1    one week ago

He told someone to form a mob and harass someone at their home?

 
 
MBFC really sucks
4.4.3  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Tacos! @4.4.2    one week ago

I haven’t figured that one out yet either as he’s never ever advocated incivility or censorship toward anyone.  [deleted]

 
 
MBFC really sucks
4.4.4  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Don Overton @4.4.1    one week ago

I watch his (Carlson’s) show as well as Hannity and Ingraham almost every weeknight and I’ve never heard him or any of them to do any such thing.  

 
 
CometRider
5  CometRider    2 weeks ago

'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!'

Brought to you by the "tolerant compassionate" Democratic party.

 
 
MBFC really sucks
5.1  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  CometRider @5    one week ago

They really won’t say anything to defend their true beliefs in that chant.  

 
 
epistte
5.2  epistte  replied to  CometRider @5    one week ago
No borders! No walls! No USA at all!' Brought to you by the "tolerant compassionate" Democratic party.

The Black Bloc anarchists are not part of the DNC.  It is obvious as anarchists that they would oppose political states. 

 
 
Vic Eldred
6  Vic Eldred    2 weeks ago

Obviously, We can't keep saying they have a "right" to protest. Stalking and intimidation are illegal and this problem is growing. This is "brown shirt" tactics pure and simple. Campus culture is now part of our daily lives. These so called protesters are violating the rights of others and need to be prosecuted.

 
 
Sparty On
6.1  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    2 weeks ago

Yep, put a few of them in the klink to become bubbas boyfriend and things might change.  

Or not ..... some might like that ....

 
 
Jasper2529
6.2  Jasper2529  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    2 weeks ago
Obviously, We can't keep saying they have a "right" to protest. Stalking and intimidation are illegal and this problem is growing.

The radical left will always find a way to invoke 1A, even when stalking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage occurs:

The host said activists rang his doorbell, broke his oak door and one protester was apparently caught on security video mentioning a pipe bomb. The group eventually scattered. It was unclear if there were any arrests. Carlson said the group posted online the home addresses of his brother and his former college roommate, Neil Patel, who co-founded the Daily Caller with Carlson.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mob-chants-threats-outside-tucker-carlsons-dc-home?fbclid=IwAR2e1k7I1KL4y07eqO-m6QXEumoWh4JzIf0BTq7ffr53B93meE5QcEVy0fc 

 
 
Sparty On
7  Sparty On    2 weeks ago

Asshats!!

 
 
Jasper2529
8  Jasper2529    2 weeks ago

Holder, Maxine, and Hillary must be very proud of this.

 
 
Tessylo
8.1  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @8    2 weeks ago

Why?

 
 
Jasper2529
8.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @8.1    2 weeks ago

Come on, Tessy, you're smarter than to ask such a question. All three of them have called for incivility and/or violence, and you know it.

 
 
Tessylo
8.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @8.1.1    2 weeks ago

What violence has any of them called for?  I  know of no calls for violence from Mr. Holder, Former First Lady and Secretary of State Clinton, or Ms. Waters.  

No quotes out of context either.  

 
 
Jasper2529
8.1.3  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @8.1.2    2 weeks ago
I  know of no calls for violence from Mr. Holder, Former First Lady and Secretary of State Clinton, or Ms. Waters. 

There are videos and articles available on the Internet of all three calling for incivility and/or violence. You can find them yourself, Tessy.

 
 
Tessylo
8.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @8.1.3    one week ago

No need.  They don't exist.  No calls for violence from Holder, Clinton, or Waters.  

 
 
Jasper2529
8.1.5  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @8.1.4    one week ago
No need.  They don't exist.  No calls for violence from Holder, Clinton, or Waters.  

As I've previously stated, there are many Internet links to them calling for incivility and/or violence.  You are certainly free to ignore and/or deny that they exist.

"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." ~ 11th century English proverb

 
 
Don Overton
8.1.6  Don Overton  replied to  Jasper2529 @8.1.1    one week ago

[Removed

 
 
Don Overton
8.1.7  Don Overton  replied to  Jasper2529 @8.1.5    one week ago

[deleted]

 
 
Jasper2529
8.1.8  Jasper2529  replied to  Don Overton @8.1.6    one week ago

The only one of the 3 people I mentioned who currently serves in Congress is Maxine Waters, and she certainly fits your description. Thank you for posting such a realistic portrayal of her to my seed. 

 
 
Texan1211
8.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @8.1.1    one week ago

jrSmiley_55_smiley_image.gif

All three of them have called for incivility and/or violence, and you know it.

Progressives will never admit to that.

 
 
Texan1211
8.1.10  Texan1211  replied to  Jasper2529 @8.1.5    one week ago
As I've previously stated, there are many Internet links to them calling for incivility and/or violence. You are certainly free to ignore and/or deny that they exist.
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." ~ 11th century English proverb

I was thinking more along the lines of the three monkeys--See no evil...…..

 
 
MBFC really sucks
8.1.11  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Don Overton @8.1.7    one week ago

From when I went to work until my drive home from work, I didn’t see the seed or anything on this site and I most certainly absolutely did not as the seeder flag your post as off topic.  Just for the record, Don. That was someone else’s decision attributed to me wrongly.  

 
 
Vic Eldred
8.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jasper2529 @8    one week ago

Let's get some thugs to surround their homes

 
 
luther28
9  luther28    2 weeks ago

I perused the articles I could find related to this incident and could find no mention of how many folks constituted the mob.

As size seems to be in the eyes of the beholder, I wonder if someone might be able to answer and satisfy my idle curiosity.

 
 
Snuffy
9.1  Snuffy  replied to  luther28 @9    2 weeks ago

It's not defined by how many people are involved, it's the nature of what they are doing.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/mob

noun
  1. a disorderly or riotous crowd of people.
  2. a crowd bent on or engaged in lawless violence.
  3. any group or collection of persons or things.
  4. the common people; the masses; populace or multitude.
  5. a criminal gang, especially one involved in drug trafficking, extortion, etc.
  6. the Mob, Mafia(def 1).
  7. Sociology . a group of persons stimulating one another to excitement and losing ordinary rational control over their activity.
  8. a flock, herd, or drove of animals: a mob of sheep.
 
 
luther28
9.1.1  luther28  replied to  Snuffy @9.1    2 weeks ago

I would disagree, if it was two or three morons involved that would not constitute a mob, it would be two or three morons.

 
 
gooseisgone
9.1.2  gooseisgone  replied to  luther28 @9.1.1    2 weeks ago

Look it up yourself, if you don't know instead trying to paint it as 2 or 3. 

 
 
luther28
9.1.3  luther28  replied to  gooseisgone @9.1.2    one week ago

[deleted,] I was not engaging you first of all secondly if you read my original comment I had already attempted to get a count. I was not attempting to minimize it, but qualify it.

 

 
 
luther28
9.1.4  luther28  replied to  luther28 @9.1.3    one week ago

Nice to see that Yiddish is still understood:)

 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
9.1.5  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  luther28 @9.1.4    one week ago

At least by me and the person who flagged it.  Sorry about that :)  Glad to see you took it in good humor. 

 
 
luther28
9.1.6  luther28  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @9.1.5    one week ago

I usually don't respond as such, but I was caught up in the moment:) As it turns out the actual number was 20, more of a group of morons rather than a mob.

Regardless they really had no business behaving as they did.

 
 
Ed-NavDoc
9.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  luther28 @9    one week ago

How would you feel if it was your home they came to? I suspect you would have a vastly different opinion.

 
 
luther28
9.2.1  luther28  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @9.2    one week ago
Regardless they really had no business behaving as they did.

I thought I had covered that, but I suppose not. I do not believe in any of my comments on this thread I condoned their behavior, my query was to the amount of folks involved as to qualify as a mob.

Although 20 people showing up at my house for any reason would be unlikely, but if with ill intent, I'm Irish that should speak for itself.

 
 
Ed-NavDoc
9.2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  luther28 @9.2.1    5 days ago

Understood. I am part Mescalero Apache. Let somebody try that at my house in my neck of the woods down here on the AZ/Mexico border.jrSmiley_7_smiley_image.png...

 
 
Sparty On
10  Sparty On    2 weeks ago

And a quick google search shows little to no reporting of this incident on CNN, NBC, CBS or ABC, etc ...... more empirical proof of how biased the mass media really is and remains.

Sad!

 
 
Tessylo
10.2  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @10    2 weeks ago

I've seen it posted many places?  [Removed

 
 
Sparty On
10.2.1  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @10.2    2 weeks ago
I've seen it posted many places?  Why do you lie?

Lol , many places?    Google disagrees with you but i suppose google lies as well.

Hilarious!

 
 
Snuffy
10.2.2  Snuffy  replied to  Tessylo @10.2    2 weeks ago

can you list where you have seen this?  I just went thru nbcnew.com,  cnn.com and msnbc.com and couldn't find anything about this. 

 
 
Tessylo
10.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Snuffy @10.2.2    2 weeks ago

I normally don't do people's homework for them but since you supposedly can't find it, here you go.  

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/fox-news-host-tucker-carlson-054206748.html

 
 
Tessylo
10.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @10.2.1    2 weeks ago

How does google lie?

Hilarious!

 
 
Sparty On
10.2.5  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.3    2 weeks ago

Ooooh wow!   The news giant Yahoo ..... so big even my google search missed it.  /s

I rest my case .....

 
 
Sparty On
10.2.6  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.4    2 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
Tessylo
10.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @10.2.5    2 weeks ago
I rest my case .....

On what?

 
 
Tessylo
10.2.8  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @10.2.6    2 weeks ago

Lost what?

I'm going nowhere.

 
 
Tessylo
10.2.9  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @10.2.5    2 weeks ago

I showed you one instance, Split Personality has supplied you three instances, so what was that you were saying again about it 'barely being reported anywhere'?

 
 
lib50
10.2.10  lib50  replied to  Snuffy @10.2.2    2 weeks ago
can you list where you have seen this?

Good lord, google Tucker Carlson and it comes up everywhere.  Do conservatives know how to access non-rightwing media?

 
 
Tacos!
10.2.11  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.3    one week ago
here you go

And you offer Yahoo? This was the original statement:

no reporting of this incident on CNN, NBC, CBS or ABC

So far, that appears to be true.

 
 
Sparty On
10.2.12  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.7    one week ago

 

[deleted]

 
 
Sparty On
10.2.13  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.9    one week ago

I see only one example from you here.

To bad, so sad  ...... as noted there is clearly a serious lack media coverage.   So there is clearly the typical mass media bias on this one.

Clear to anyone with vision better than say 20-100 and as YOU well know .... that ain't very good vision so it doesn't take much.

 
 
Tessylo
10.2.14  Tessylo  replied to  lib50 @10.2.10    one week ago

Google just gives them such biased results.  Such negative results against the 'president'.  LOL.  

 
 
Don Overton
10.3  Don Overton  replied to  Sparty On @10    one week ago

Wow what a  stretch

 
 
Split Personality
11  Split Personality    2 weeks ago

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mob-chants-threats-outside-tucker-carlsons-dc-home

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/08/mob-tucker-carlsons-home-antifa-break-door-chant-fox-host/1927868002/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cnn-sides-with-foxs-tucker-carlson-after-anti-fascist-protesters-rally-outside-his-house

If I had  7,400 square foot, $4 million dollar home, I would have security cameras, lots of security cameras......

 
 
Tacos!
11.1  Tacos!  replied to  Split Personality @11    2 weeks ago

But no ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. Embarrassing. Meanwhile they'll fill a show with how mistreated Jim Acosta was.

 
 
Split Personality
11.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Tacos! @11.1    2 weeks ago

Apparently the 12 people killed in California is considered more important news by some.

 
 
Texan1211
11.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @11.1.1    2 weeks ago

I wonder if Californians will be pushing to pass sensible gun laws now.

 
 
lib50
11.1.3  lib50  replied to  Tacos! @11.1    2 weeks ago

It is literally EVERYWHERE!  All you need to do is fricken google 'Tucker Carlson'! 

 
 
lib50
11.1.4  lib50  replied to  Texan1211 @11.1.2    2 weeks ago

I wonder if the gop will offer up their 'thoughts and prayers' again.

 
 
Tacos!
11.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  Split Personality @11.1.1    one week ago

Of course it's more important, but I think they can walk and chew bubble gum, ya know? I went to those news sites and searched for the story without finding it. I looked again just now and found a story on CNN Business that was posted only 45 minutes ago.

 
 
Texan1211
11.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  lib50 @11.1.4    one week ago

Seems as if they will be just as effective as "sensible gun laws".

 
 
Tacos!
11.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  lib50 @11.1.4    one week ago
I wonder if the gop will offer up their 'thoughts and prayers' again.

I wonder if the Left will insist we pass a law outlawing magazines of a certain size.

 
 
devangelical
11.1.8  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @11.1.5    one week ago

CNN? I guess that proves it's fake news

 
 
Tacos!
11.1.9  Tacos!  replied to  devangelical @11.1.8    one week ago

From the CNN story:

"I think Tucker is a terrible influence on modern America but that doesn't justify harassing him at home. Go high, not low," CNN commentator Max Boot tweeted.

Couldn't help himself. Couldn't just condemn the act. He had to slam Carlson, too.

 
 
MonsterMash
11.1.10  MonsterMash  replied to  Split Personality @11.1.1    one week ago
Apparently the 12 people killed in California is considered more important news by some.

The liberal media considers the Jim Acosta story more important.

 
 
Split Personality
11.1.11  Split Personality  replied to  MonsterMash @11.1.10    one week ago

Sorry, I've been watching TV news all day, switching from Fox to MSNBC & CNN

90%  coverage of the shooting.

Nothing about Acosta anywhere.

Alternate stories have included the "ties" and recounts looming

as well as the Sessions - Whitaker stories.

Not much of anything else.

 
 
Split Personality
11.1.12  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @11.1.11    one week ago

2:10PM CST all 3 networks switched to other topics

Kemp/Abrams

Sessions/Whitaker

Mueller report

 
 
Split Personality
11.1.13  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @11.1.12    one week ago

2:55PM CST  CNN

Brian Seltzer & Brook Baldwin decried the Carlson home being targeted and vandalized ( they spray painted some sort of symbol on the driveway )

FOX & CNN declared solidarity in condemning the protest as did Stephen Colbert.

3PM CST

Back to the Ventura shooting...

 
 
Don Overton
11.2  Don Overton  replied to  Split Personality @11    one week ago

And you know it's an antifa group, how?  Because Fox and Fools say so

 
 
JohnRussell
11.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Split Personality @11    one week ago

Not much of a mob, they didnt even set anything on fire. The chanting seemed a little lethargic too. 

I don't approve of any protest at the object of the protests home though. His wife should have called the cops. 

 
 
Vic Eldred
11.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @11    one week ago
If I had  7,400 square foot, $4 million dollar home, I would have security cameras, lots of security cameras......

Are you blaming the victim?

What about the thugs?  Didn't Hillary Clinton say that they would become civil as soon as they took over the House of Representatives?

 
 
Split Personality
11.4.1  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.4    one week ago
Didn't Hillary Clinton say that they would become civil as soon as they took over the House of Representatives?

Don't know, is she still alive?  relevant?  or on topic? lol

 
 
Texan1211
11.4.2  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @11.4.1    one week ago
(deleted)
 
 
JBB
11.4.3  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @11.4.2    one week ago

Did SP remove any of Vic's comment for being off topic? No...

 
 
Texan1211
11.4.5  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @11.4.3    one week ago

Did anyone say he did? No...…..

 
 
Texan1211
11.5  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @11    one week ago

Whether he has security or not isn't the issue.

The issue is some loons showing up and banging on his door and telling him to leave town.

 
 
Split Personality
11.5.1  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @11.5    one week ago

Don't you have a Ring or three?

Rats, Roaches and punks scurry when the lights come on and expose them....

I can attest to that with videos, lol...

 
 
Texan1211
11.5.2  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @11.5.1    one week ago

I have absolutely no fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

It doesn't MATTER if he had or has security. The people shouldn't have been knocking on his door and threatening him. 

I am sure you thought you had a point on that post, but for the life of me I can't tell what you thought it was.

 
 
KDMichigan
11.5.3  KDMichigan  replied to  Split Personality @11.5.1    one week ago
Don't you have a Ring or three?

I'm lost, is this a off topic thing?

Rats, Roaches and punks scurry when the lights come on and expose them....

Yes Antifa does when you take there masks and sticks from them and knock them on their ass.

I can attest to that with videos, lol...

Videos or it didn't happen.

 
 
Texan1211
11.5.4  Texan1211  replied to  KDMichigan @11.5.3    one week ago

I was hoping SOMEBODY could shed some light on whatever it is he is talking about!

 
 
KDMichigan
11.5.5  KDMichigan  replied to  Texan1211 @11.5.4    one week ago
I was hoping SOMEBODY could shed some light on whatever it is he is talking about!

I don't think I did but I guarantee my comment will be deleted as being ……..off topic.  

 
 
Texan1211
11.5.6  Texan1211  replied to  KDMichigan @11.5.5    one week ago

The problem with pseudo-intellectuals is that they always forget that others don't think as they do.

 
 
Split Personality
11.5.7  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @11.5.4    one week ago
I was hoping SOMEBODY could shed some light on whatever it is he is talking about!

actually an astute comment, lol !!!

https://shop.ring.com/collections/security-cams

 
 
Texan1211
11.5.8  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @11.5.7    one week ago

So, because he doesn't have that, he should be accosted at home, along with his family?

Wow...that's just fucking BRILLIANT!

What a commercial for that security system--------"Buy one today or feel the wrath of the progressive left!"

 
 
Texan1211
11.5.9  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @11.5.7    one week ago

I had no clue that we could shill for companies and products here.

 
 
Split Personality
11.5.10  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @11.5.8    one week ago

Nope, but if he had that or anything similar, and I'm guessing he can afford a much better system than that,

he would have video and audio with which the police could have identified any trespassers or vandals in the act of defacing his driveway

or protesting without a permit, etc.

 
 
badfish hαηd ⊕ƒ †hε Ωuεεη
12  badfish hαηd ⊕ƒ †hε Ωuεεη    one week ago

Tucker Carlson's front door was broken. They tried to break in and his wife hid in the pantry. 

That is just unacceptable. He needs to get the wife a 12 gauge.

Now back to the breaking News: Jim Acosta was assaulted by 110lb Female White House Staffer, may need emergency surgery to save his ego!

 
 
Skrekk
12.1  Skrekk  replied to  badfish hαηd ⊕ƒ †hε Ωuεεη @12    one week ago

Apart from the target being a notorious racist and white nationalist, what's the difference between this and what anti-abortion cultists do at the homes of gynecologists?    Don't those right wing nuts claim they're just exercising their 1st Amendment freedums?

https://www.gq.com/story/tucker-carlson-white-nationalist-diversity-terrible

 
 
MUVA
12.1.1  MUVA  replied to  Skrekk @12.1    one week ago

Your comment is complete hyperbole and untrue. 

 
 
Tacos!
12.1.2  Tacos!  replied to  Skrekk @12.1    one week ago
Apart from the target being a notorious racist and white nationalist

Only in your imagination.

 
 
MBFC really sucks
12.1.3  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  MUVA @12.1.1    one week ago

It was simply nothing more than several sweeping generalizations cobbled together into a rambling comment.  

 
 
Don Overton
12.2  Don Overton  replied to  badfish hαηd ⊕ƒ †hε Ωuεεη @12    one week ago

[deleted]

[Don we are member moderated. That means that members are allowed to say what they feel when they are not being moderators. So calling BF out for his opinion is wrong. As long as he shows no bias] in [his moderation, (and he doesn't) then he can have his opinion without going personal or meta.] 

 
 
A. Macarthur
12.2.1  A. Macarthur  replied to  Don Overton @12.2    one week ago
when they are not being members
Should read, "when they are not being moderators."

 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
12.2.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  A. Macarthur @12.2.1    one week ago

You are correct Mac. Adjustment made! 

 
 
A. Macarthur
13  A. Macarthur    one week ago

 
 
badfish hαηd ⊕ƒ †hε Ωuεεη
13.1  badfish hαηd ⊕ƒ †hε Ωuεεη  replied to  A. Macarthur @13    one week ago

Holy off topic derail...lol

 
 
A. Macarthur
14  A. Macarthur    one week ago

Fair and balanced …

You may want to look around the board and read the comments attributing certain behaviors to, i.e. 

Heartland..... Tacos....  You're missing the issue entirely.

For conservatives, politics is a set of beliefs about how the country should run.

For "progressives", it's a religion.  It's how they decide good from evil, righteous people from unrighteous, and believers from infidels.  There is no behavior against the infidels that they consider to be out of bounds or off limits.   Most of them see nothing wrong with this, and those that do will attempt to defend it anyway.....because......religion.

And …

Democrat "leaders", if there is such a thing, need to calm down their thuggish mob. Who knows, people with pitchforks and torches might just start showing up at their doors. Such behavior has become standard for the loony left.

And …

The radical left will always find a way to invoke 1A, even when stalking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage occurs:

And …

Just another example of how their self-proclaimed tolerance and respect for all people is not genuine, but just a political tactic. If the politics of a person don't line up with them, their go-to is to attack them based on some immutable characteristic.

NOTE: In this thread, I denounced the act of demonstrating near to and/or on anyone's private residence; but the selectively-indignant among us, comment ONLY on the demonstrations that do not coincide with their politics or ideology.

By all means, denounce all that is inappropriate, illegal, ugly …

BUT DON"T CALL OUT ONE SIDE IN SUCH A WAY AS TO MAKE "OTHER SIDES" WITHOUT SIN.

 
 
arkpdx
14.1  arkpdx  replied to  A. Macarthur @14    one week ago
BUT DON"T CALL OUT ONE SIDE IN SUCH A WAY AS TO MAKE "OTHER SIDES" WITHOUT SIN.

So tell me when a right wing group went to some liberal politician or celebrities home and yelled and screamed and threatened both the celebrity and his family. 

I'll wait! 

 
 
A. Macarthur
14.1.1  A. Macarthur  replied to  arkpdx @14.1    one week ago
So tell me when a right wing group went to some liberal politician or celebrities home and yelled and screamed and threatened both the celebrity and his family.  I'll wait! 

While you're waiting, instead of selectively pulling out just a part of my comment, after which making it appear as though you a point … quote the portion that answers your disingenuous gotcha' question … namely …

"NOTE: In this thread, I denounced the act of demonstrating near to and/or on anyone's private residence; but the selectively-indignant among us, comment ONLY on the demonstrations that do not coincide with their politics or ideology.

By all means, denounce all that is inappropriate, illegal, ugly … "

But all right … since you're waiting …

In the early 1990s, anti-abortion extremists concluded that murdering providers was the only way to stop abortion. The first provider was murdered in 1993. Including the recent attack in Colorado, there have been 11 murders and 26 attempted murders due to anti-abortion violence.

Several of the doctors were attacked in their own homes. In 2009, NAF member Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed in his church in Wichita, Kansas. In 2015, a police officer and two people at a clinic were killed when a gunman entered a clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

And why limit this to "homes"? In Hebrew and Yiddish, the term for synagogue is …

בית כנסת‬ bet kenesset, 'house of assembly' or בית תפילה‬ bet tefila, "house of prayer", Yiddish: שול shul, Ladino: אסנוגה esnoga or קהל kahal), is a Jewish or Samaritan house of worship.

So spare me the equivocation and the "I'll wait" talking down; when Nazis, Skinheads and white nationalists vote as liberal democrats … do let me know.

Now, I'll wait.

 
 
MUVA
14.1.2  MUVA  replied to  A. Macarthur @14.1.1    one week ago

ALL of this kind of bull shit has to stop.

 
 
A. Macarthur
14.1.3  A. Macarthur  replied to  MUVA @14.1.2    one week ago

On that we can agree.

 
 
MUVA
15  MUVA    one week ago

This is why you need a AR 15 there will come a time when the leftist will not stop at the front door.

 
 
Tacos!
15.1  Tacos!  replied to  MUVA @15    one week ago

From the sounds of things, they didn't stop there by choice. Apparently, they damaged the door, but the feeble vegans probably lacked the strength to knock it down. Keep in mind, they only had one hand for the work as they were busy using the other to pat themselves on the back for being woke.

 
 
MUVA
15.1.1  MUVA  replied to  Tacos! @15.1    one week ago

They got got Tuckered they are low on Iron.

 
 
Split Personality
15.1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Tacos! @15.1    one week ago
The police report does not mention damage to the front door. It says Carlson’s wife “retreated to a room in the rear of her home” after hearing loud banging and pounding on the door. Officers found an anarchy symbol spray-painted on the driveway, according to the police report.

The report describes the incident as a suspected hate crime with “anti-political” bias. Police have stepped up their presence in the neighborhood as they continue investigating the incident, spokesman Dustin Sternbeck said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/anti-fascist-protesters-target-tucker-carlsons-home/2018/11/08/6c91ad78-e36d-11e8-8f5f-a55347f48762_story.html?utm_term=.8ef3ae5a34c1

Even though they just recently moved in, I cannot imagine a 4$ million dollar home, especially of a celebrity, without a decent storm door and security/surveillance system.

I mean, his net worth is 40 mill with a 5 mill income from Fox, what does he spend it on?

 
 
Tacos!
15.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Split Personality @15.1.2    one week ago
what does he spend it on?

It used to be bow ties. But now? Yeah, I'm stumped.

 
 
epistte
15.1.4  epistte  replied to  Split Personality @15.1.2    one week ago
Even though they just recently moved in, I cannot imagine a 4$ million dollar home, especially of a celebrity, without a decent storm door and security/surveillance system. I mean, his net worth is 40 mill with a 5 mill income from Fox, what does he spend it on?

An integrated security system is almost mandatory once you cross the $750K line.   Many homeowner policies require it. 

 
 
Texan1211
15.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @15.1.2    one week ago

What does his apparent lack of a security system have to do with a few loons acting like fools?

 
 
MUVA
15.1.6  MUVA  replied to  Split Personality @15.1.2    one week ago

So you and your deserve to be attacked because you don't have a camera or a heavy security door ? 

 
 
Vic Eldred
16  Vic Eldred    one week ago

I hear that the trespassers, should they be caught, will be charged with a hate crime.  All of it sounds good but we really need to start prosecuting these people. 

 
 
epistte
16.1  epistte  replied to  Vic Eldred @16    one week ago
I hear that the trespassers, should they be caught, will be charged with a hate crime.  All of it sounds good but we really need to start prosecuting these people. 

They can be obviously charged with trespassing and vandalism but I'm not seeing how it could be a hate crime. Political affiliation and workplace aren't a protected class.   The hate crime specification only comes into play when the crime is based on the victim's race, creed, color, sex/gender, disability, ethnicity, and/or immigration. None of those apply in this situation.

A hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. For the purposes of collecting statistics, the FBI has defined a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity.” Hate itself is not a crime—and the FBI is mindful of protecting freedom of speech and other civil liberties.
 
 
bccrane
16.1.1  bccrane  replied to  epistte @16.1    one week ago

Those that apply are:

Race - caucasian 

Creed - conservative 

Color - white

Sex/gender - male

Or does it take all seven you listed to qualify?

 
 
MUVA
16.1.2  MUVA  replied to  bccrane @16.1.1    one week ago

I think some people think he deserved what happen.

 
 
epistte
16.1.3  epistte  replied to  bccrane @16.1.1    one week ago
Those that apply are:

Race - caucasian 

Creed - conservative 

Color - white

Sex/gender - male

Or does it take all seven you listed to qualify?

He was not targeted because he is white, male, or heterosexual and/or CIS. A person's creed refers to their religious affliiation and not their political party.

 
 
Skrekk
16.1.4  Skrekk  replied to  bccrane @16.1.1    one week ago
Or does it take all seven you listed to qualify?

Maybe you need to learn how hate crimes laws work before you comment?    Being a butt-hurt racist moron who wears bow ties isn't a protected class.

 
 
MBFC really sucks
16.1.5  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  MUVA @16.1.2    one week ago

Without doubt you are correct.  

 
 
epistte
16.1.6  epistte  replied to  Skrekk @16.1.4    one week ago
Maybe you need to learn how hate crimes laws work before you comment?

I might have to create a thread about what is and what isn't a hate crime because it seems that many people do not understand that legal concept. 

 
 
bccrane
16.1.7  bccrane  replied to  epistte @16.1.3    one week ago

Look up the definition of creed again, it covers religious and political beliefs.

 
 
bccrane
16.1.8  bccrane  replied to  Skrekk @16.1.4    one week ago

How many "butt-hurt racist moron"s who wear bow ties need to be attacked and threatened before they can become a "protected class?

 
 
epistte
16.1.9  epistte  replied to  bccrane @16.1.7    one week ago
Look up the definition of creed again, it covers religious and political beliefs.

What site did you use?

According to the FBI, your political views/affiliation is not a protected class,

Defining a Hate Crime 

A hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. For the purposes of collecting statistics, the FBI has defined a hate crime as a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity.” Hate itself is not a crime—and the FBI is mindful of protecting freedom of speech and other civil liberties.

These efforts serve as a backstop for investigations by state and local authorities, which handle the vast majority of hate crime cases throughout the country.

 
 
Split Personality
17  Split Personality    one week ago

Locked until the seeder returns.....

 
 
MBFC really sucks
17.1  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Split Personality @17    one week ago

Why?  There were all of 15-16 posts here since I went to work this morning none particularly uncivil so why other than it being my seed was that done? I was actually looking at seedable articles when SP locked this not at all busy seed.  

 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
17.1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MBFC really sucks @17.1    one week ago

SP locked this article for good reason and you unlocked it without permission. 191 comments and you have made 3 while there is a panel of moderation from your lack of moderation. Do that again, and the article will remain closed. 

 
 
MBFC really sucks
17.1.2  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @17.1.1    one week ago

[Removed]

 
 
MBFC really sucks
17.1.3  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  MBFC really sucks @17.1.2    one week ago

I counted 8 of my posts on the seed and I know I made multiple flags when viewing this seed yesterday.  Today it needed no new flags. 

 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
17.1.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MBFC really sucks @17.1.3    one week ago

You need to be more a part of your articles XX. This is a discussion we have had before. There were a ton of new flags from today and maybe if you were here, you would have known that.

 
 
Nowhere Man
17.1.5  Nowhere Man  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @17.1.4    one week ago

And saying this in public just gave the unscrupulous a way (read tactic) to have a seed or posting knocked down or locked. When the seeder is away, flood it with flags and force the moderators into frustration mode and lock it down......

Interesting.

 
 
MBFC really sucks
17.1.6  seeder  MBFC really sucks  replied to  Nowhere Man @17.1.5    one week ago

And all the flags were from prior day posts.  There were only sixteen posts Friday from when I went to work and the time it was locked 20 min. before I  returned home from work and after work errands like getting gas, going to the bank and grocery store, like having a life.  

 
 
Studiusbagus
17.1.7  Studiusbagus  replied to  Nowhere Man @17.1.5    one week ago
When the seeder is away, flood it with flags and force the moderators into frustration mode and lock it down......

Hmmm, I would never thought about doing something like that...

But you did.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

ArkansasHermit-too
Galen Marvin Ross
arkpdx
TTGA


58 visitors