Leftist Mob Shows Up At Tucker Carlson's Home: 'You Are Not Safe'
On Wednesday night, a leftist mob showed up at Fox News host Tucker Carlson's Washington, D.C. home while he was on-air taping his show, "Tucker Carlson Tonight." In the video posted to social media by leftist group "Smash Racism DC," the angry mob outside Carlson's home chanted that they will "fight" him and demanded he leave town.
Carlson has a wife and four children.
"Activists ring doorbell, hold protest at the Washington DC area home of [Tucker Carlson], racist, sexist, bigoted FOX News personality. So far no one has opened the door," says a caption to one of the videos. "Tucker Carlson, we will fight! We know where you sleep at night!"
"We are outside your home to protest against your fascism and racism," the mob can be heard saying in the video.
"Tucker Carlson, we will fight, we know where you sleep at night!" they chant in unison.
Another caption from the group says, "'Racist scumbag, leave town!' Every night you spread fear into our homes—fear of the other, fear of us, and fear of them. Each night you tell us we are not safe. Tonight you're reminded that we have a voice. Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either."
"Racist scumbag, leave town," the group chants.
“Racist scumbag, leave town!”
Every night you spread fear into our homes—fear of the other, fear of us, and fear of them. Each night you tell us we are not safe. Tonight you’re reminded that we have a voice. Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either. #KnockKnockTucker pic.twitter.com/QlNVKS4oxN — Smash Racism DC (@SmashRacismDC) November 7, 2018
"'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!' This is what we think of your racist rhetoric and fearmongering toward immigrants," reads another tweet's caption.
"You can’t hide from those you hurt, Tucker," said Smash Racism DC.
Carlson, who was apparently on-air while his home was targeted, did not make direct reference to the attack during Wednesday's show. But he did reference angry mobs "scaring your children" to a guest, seemingly in veiled connection to the mob reportedly at his home.
When Carlson signed off his show, he said he will be taking the next two days off. "I'll see you Monday," he told viewers.
“In the video posted to social media by leftist group "Smash Racism DC," the angry mob outside Carlson's home chanted that they will "fight" him and demanded he leave town.
Carlson has a wife and four children.
"Activists ring doorbell, hold protest at the Washington DC area home of [Tucker Carlson], racist, sexist, bigoted FOX News personality. So far no one has opened the door," says a caption to one of the videos. "Tucker Carlson, we will fight! We know where you sleep at night!"
Really? I thought he was a swish.
He could still be a deep in the closet swish.
Having a wife and four children has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
Isn't it rather strange that the homophobic comments on here most often come from progressives?
[deleted]
Just another example of how their self-proclaimed tolerance and respect for all people is not genuine, but just a political tactic. If the politics of a person don't line up with them, their go-to is to attack them based on some immutable characteristic.
[deleted]
'The hypocrisy is thick with some!'
It always is!
[Removed]
Tessy, Carlson works for Fox you have him mixed up with CNN's Don Lemon or Anderson Cooper, they're the swishes.
[Removed]
I guess it IS a little hard for some to read these posts nd determine who made any comments about being homosexual, and in such a way as to be disparaging.
Not for all of us, thank God!
Yeah, I don't go around chastising others for making homophobic comments and then make them myself.
In fact, no one on here or anywhere else can quote me ever making a homophobic comment or referring to homosexuals as swishes or anything other than what they are.
Pshaw, if calling someone an Uncle Tom isn't racist then how can swish be homophonic?/s
Good one!
We all know if a conservative dared to call a homosexual (or even a person we merely SUSPECT is a homosexual) all hell would break loose and that person would most likely be referred to the SPLC for uttering those hateful words!
[deleted]
LOL!
Does the term "beard" mean anything to you?
Homophobic comment. Sad.
it is only homophobic if a conservative says it.
LMAO!
Urban Dictionary has your answer.
You're wrong, again.
It is all bullshit. Don't let them reel you in!
You just did make such a comment
Only when calling out homophobic comments
Okay, let's play!
You first:
Show me any homophobic comments in this thread, without regard to who made them.
When you can honestly do that, we'll talk.
That is not factual.
Perhaps for once you could PROVE something instead of merely bleating about it?
Give it a shot!
I wouldn’t count on anything but crickets 🦗 coming from whom you address.
Yeah, I don't.
That would be insane--expecting different results!
So very well said and the bottom line. It’s almost sad watching the other side defend, rationalize, and make excuses for the mob at Carlson’s house. Oh and then all the whataboutisms they use.
E.A See here also about the " Power of Minorities and Language " ::
Description
A Lot of talk about " Hate Speech " and here we see a fine example of how a Minority is forcing its opinion and " language " and doing so in a very detrimental way to Society and the way it needs to function!
You made an issue of the word "beard" in 1.1.25. I defined the word for you.
[deleted]
For the record … IMO, NO ONE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF/AT A PRIVATE RESIDENCE.
In watching the video, maybe I missed it … I did not see any footage of the "mob" itself, and, from the audio, it sounded like something far smaller than a "mob" … still, they should not have gone there.
Talk about mobs
[No value]
Perhaps if you turn your monitor on? Then lighten it?
Did that … there are silhouettes visible but no definitive indication of the number of participants, nor, anything definitive that identifies them as ANTIFA.
But continue to offer your helpful advice.
[deleted]
[deleted]
How many do you think it would need to be considered a mob if they showed up on your front lawn then beat on your front door to point of damaging it while chanting thinly veiled threats and demanding you leave your home?
I'd bake cookies and make a pot of coffee.
Hey, if the targeted person is remotely conservative, it is all fair game to most progressives.
I would assume that you are well armed then.☺
I'm not always afraid of other people, so why would I need a gun?
But that's a slippery slope, at some point using partisan reasoning, everyone becomes fair game.
Are you saying that you would just have cookies and coffee when there are people threatening you, beating on your front door?
Not really believable, is it?
No, not at all.
Recreational pot isn't yet legal in this state, but if they are willing to share an ounce, I'll happily bake the weed cookies.
You seem to think that the world is a very scary place to be feared.
I repudiated the action twice in this thread; if you have followed the discussion, you would know I disagree with the demonstration.
Not at all, it's only as scary as you allow it to be.
It's legal here, come on over.
CBD oil is contested in Ohio, even though there is no THC in it. I'll send you $50.00 for a bottle.
$5.00 says that it was the work of Black Bloc anarchists. The Antifa would not spraypaint Anarchist logos as graffiti.
So it would seem.
So you're saying it never happened to Carlson family, and that such harassment and threats are OK unless it happens to a liberal? [deleted]
So it would seem in my opinion.
Don't confuse the Antifa with the Black Bloc. They seek very different goals and have different targets.
The implication that I need to keep a scorecard to somehow differentiate between various leftist terrorist groups lends them more legitimacy than I care to offer.
As a gesture of bipartisanship, I refuse to track Neo-Nazi groups also.
[Deleted]
The Neo-Nazis are on the rise with Trump's political popularity.
Isn't it just so much easier to recognize loons as loons, without having to think which party they belong to?
Especially when they make up such a small segment of the population?
No real, thinking person should confuse a handful of loons with a political party in America.
I'm trying to imagine what I might have said that would have set you off enough to violate the COC. Wow.
Are they? Or are reports of Neo-Nazis on the rise. Two different things. I'd be interested to see actual impartial statistics.
In any case, I don't care about these people, so I don't keep track of who hates for what team.
Microscopic. Like...electron microscope microscopic.
Exactly, which is why the SPLC is destroying its original mission of going after real and violent hate groups by targeting, defaming, slandering, and libeling people just like me who run mainstream conservative groups I identify with.
1.) We don't live in a democracy. The US is a constitutional republic.
2.) Those groups are free to exist because of our freedom of speech and freedom of association. They do not have to prove their social worth in order to exist. When they commit crimes their members can be arrested for their acts.
Just what he deserves
Another comment in support of leftist terrorists.
Why is it that he deserves a mob at his front door frightening his wife while he’s at work?
He doesn't.
It is the way with some progressives, though--threats and bully tactics!
So it's not ok with you to tell a racist he's a racist, so it's ok with you to tell a neo nazi, he's a nazi, so it's ok with you to tell a liar he's a liar. Got it. Typical Trump with the ugly trump mob
Tucker Carlson is none of those things you mentioned. He’s a conservative well within the mainstream of American political discourse. There is absolutely no justification whatsoever for what happened at his home. No excuse, no rationalization. Just simply wrong.
There is little evidence he's a racist.
Even if he were, it's fucking not OK to go beat on his door and scare his wife.
What a bunch of lunatics! What is wrong with people?
Leave the "town" of Washington D.C.? ROFL. Seriously? Who do you think you are? Where do you think are? Leave town? What century do you think this is?
But don't call them an angry mob. That's rude. Threatening someone is cool, but identifying a group of angry, threatening people as a mob is beyond the pale. Cue Brooke Baldwin.
If by "we" you mean illegal aliens, well, theoretically, you could be deported at any time, but is that "not safe?" If that's what you mean, Tucker doesn't do that; the law does that.
[Removed]
[Comment deleted due to context]
I want someone to defend this shit. If this is really what you think, you shouldn't be in this country, and I frankly don't understand why you would want to be here anyway.
They believe it yet won’t defend it. So typical.
They operate like this on a number of issues. They do everything they can to encourage and then ignore illegal immigration, but when pressed they claim "no one is advocating open borders."
Similarly, they pursue every policy they can to make it extremely difficult or impossible for law abiding to citizens to procure, own, and use firearms, but then they claim "no is talking about repealing the 2nd amendment. If you think we want someone to come take your guns, you're just paranoid."
It's like gaslighting is a plank of the Democratic Party platform.
Because it is!
There's an old saying:
What goes around comes around!
When? Should I organize a group in Brookline?
Really? When have conservative mobs gone to a liberal personality’s home and threatened them and their family? What a weak attempt to justify the behavior of a liberal mob.
Heartland..... Tacos.... You're missing the issue entirely.
For conservatives, politics is a set of beliefs about how the country should run.
For "progressives", it's a religion. It's how they decide good from evil, righteous people from unrighteous, and believers from infidels. There is no behavior against the infidels that they consider to be out of bounds or off limits. Most of them see nothing wrong with this, and those that do will attempt to defend it anyway.....because......religion.
[Removed]
Nah, the new trend is mailing bombs, working or not, planning to bomb a whole apartment complex of Somalians, or walking in a non-Christian or minority house of worship and killing the congregation.
Where's your moral compass?
[deleted]
Many folks moral compasses work about as good a real compass does at the North Pole .....
When was Tucker Carlson camped outside someone's house with a mob demanding they leave town and threatening "we know where you sleep at night?"
No but he does have his mob threaten others. [Removed]
He told someone to form a mob and harass someone at their home?
I haven’t figured that one out yet either as he’s never ever advocated incivility or censorship toward anyone. [deleted]
I watch his (Carlson’s) show as well as Hannity and Ingraham almost every weeknight and I’ve never heard him or any of them to do any such thing.
'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!'
Brought to you by the "tolerant compassionate" Democratic party.
They really won’t say anything to defend their true beliefs in that chant.
The Black Bloc anarchists are not part of the DNC. It is obvious as anarchists that they would oppose political states.
Obviously, We can't keep saying they have a "right" to protest. Stalking and intimidation are illegal and this problem is growing. This is "brown shirt" tactics pure and simple. Campus culture is now part of our daily lives. These so called protesters are violating the rights of others and need to be prosecuted.
Yep, put a few of them in the klink to become bubbas boyfriend and things might change.
Or not ..... some might like that ....
The radical left will always find a way to invoke 1A, even when stalking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage occurs:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mob-chants-threats-outside-tucker-carlsons-dc-home?fbclid=IwAR2e1k7I1KL4y07eqO-m6QXEumoWh4JzIf0BTq7ffr53B93meE5QcEVy0fc
Asshats!!
Holder, Maxine, and Hillary must be very proud of this.
Why?
Come on, Tessy, you're smarter than to ask such a question. All three of them have called for incivility and/or violence, and you know it.
What violence has any of them called for? I know of no calls for violence from Mr. Holder, Former First Lady and Secretary of State Clinton, or Ms. Waters.
No quotes out of context either.
There are videos and articles available on the Internet of all three calling for incivility and/or violence. You can find them yourself, Tessy.
No need. They don't exist. No calls for violence from Holder, Clinton, or Waters.
As I've previously stated, there are many Internet links to them calling for incivility and/or violence. You are certainly free to ignore and/or deny that they exist.
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." ~ 11th century English proverb
[Removed]
[deleted]
The only one of the 3 people I mentioned who currently serves in Congress is Maxine Waters, and she certainly fits your description. Thank you for posting such a realistic portrayal of her to my seed.
Progressives will never admit to that.
I was thinking more along the lines of the three monkeys--See no evil...…..
From when I went to work until my drive home from work, I didn’t see the seed or anything on this site and I most certainly absolutely did not as the seeder flag your post as off topic. Just for the record, Don. That was someone else’s decision attributed to me wrongly.
Let's get some thugs to surround their homes
I perused the articles I could find related to this incident and could find no mention of how many folks constituted the mob.
As size seems to be in the eyes of the beholder, I wonder if someone might be able to answer and satisfy my idle curiosity.
It's not defined by how many people are involved, it's the nature of what they are doing.
I would disagree, if it was two or three morons involved that would not constitute a mob, it would be two or three morons.
[deleted,] I was not engaging you first of all secondly if you read my original comment I had already attempted to get a count. I was not attempting to minimize it, but qualify it.
Nice to see that Yiddish is still understood:)
At least by me and the person who flagged it. Sorry about that Glad to see you took it in good humor.
I usually don't respond as such, but I was caught up in the moment As it turns out the actual number was 20, more of a group of morons rather than a mob.
Regardless they really had no business behaving as they did.
How would you feel if it was your home they came to? I suspect you would have a vastly different opinion.
I thought I had covered that, but I suppose not. I do not believe in any of my comments on this thread I condoned their behavior, my query was to the amount of folks involved as to qualify as a mob.
Although 20 people showing up at my house for any reason would be unlikely, but if with ill intent, I'm Irish that should speak for itself.
Understood. I am part Mescalero Apache. Let somebody try that at my house in my neck of the woods down here on the AZ/Mexico border. ...
And a quick google search shows little to no reporting of this incident on CNN, NBC, CBS or ABC, etc ...... more empirical proof of how biased the mass media really is and remains.
Sad!
I've seen it posted many places? [Removed]
Lol , many places? Google disagrees with you but i suppose google lies as well.
Hilarious!
can you list where you have seen this? I just went thru nbcnew.com, cnn.com and msnbc.com and couldn't find anything about this.
I normally don't do people's homework for them but since you supposedly can't find it, here you go.
How does google lie?
Hilarious!
Ooooh wow! The news giant Yahoo ..... so big even my google search missed it. /s
I rest my case .....
[deleted]
On what?
Lost what?
I'm going nowhere.
I showed you one instance, Split Personality has supplied you three instances, so what was that you were saying again about it 'barely being reported anywhere'?
Good lord, google Tucker Carlson and it comes up everywhere. Do conservatives know how to access non-rightwing media?
And you offer Yahoo? This was the original statement:
So far, that appears to be true.
[deleted]
I see only one example from you here.
To bad, so sad ...... as noted there is clearly a serious lack media coverage. So there is clearly the typical mass media bias on this one.
Clear to anyone with vision better than say 20-100 and as YOU well know .... that ain't very good vision so it doesn't take much.
Google just gives them such biased results. Such negative results against the 'president'. LOL.
Wow what a stretch
If I had 7,400 square foot, $4 million dollar home, I would have security cameras, lots of security cameras......
But no ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. Embarrassing. Meanwhile they'll fill a show with how mistreated Jim Acosta was.
Apparently the 12 people killed in California is considered more important news by some.
I wonder if Californians will be pushing to pass sensible gun laws now.
It is literally EVERYWHERE! All you need to do is fricken google 'Tucker Carlson'!
I wonder if the gop will offer up their 'thoughts and prayers' again.
Of course it's more important, but I think they can walk and chew bubble gum, ya know? I went to those news sites and searched for the story without finding it. I looked again just now and found a story on CNN Business that was posted only 45 minutes ago.
Seems as if they will be just as effective as "sensible gun laws".
I wonder if the Left will insist we pass a law outlawing magazines of a certain size.
CNN? I guess that proves it's fake news
From the CNN story:
Couldn't help himself. Couldn't just condemn the act. He had to slam Carlson, too.
The liberal media considers the Jim Acosta story more important.
Sorry, I've been watching TV news all day, switching from Fox to MSNBC & CNN
90% coverage of the shooting.
Nothing about Acosta anywhere.
Alternate stories have included the "ties" and recounts looming
as well as the Sessions - Whitaker stories.
Not much of anything else.
2:10PM CST all 3 networks switched to other topics
Kemp/Abrams
Sessions/Whitaker
Mueller report
2:55PM CST CNN
Brian Seltzer & Brook Baldwin decried the Carlson home being targeted and vandalized ( they spray painted some sort of symbol on the driveway )
FOX & CNN declared solidarity in condemning the protest as did Stephen Colbert.
3PM CST
Back to the Ventura shooting...
And you know it's an antifa group, how? Because Fox and Fools say so
Not much of a mob, they didnt even set anything on fire. The chanting seemed a little lethargic too.
I don't approve of any protest at the object of the protests home though. His wife should have called the cops.
Are you blaming the victim?
What about the thugs? Didn't Hillary Clinton say that they would become civil as soon as they took over the House of Representatives?
Don't know, is she still alive? relevant? or on topic? lol
Did SP remove any of Vic's comment for being off topic? No...
Did anyone say he did? No...…..
Whether he has security or not isn't the issue.
The issue is some loons showing up and banging on his door and telling him to leave town.
Don't you have a Ring or three?
Rats, Roaches and punks scurry when the lights come on and expose them....
I can attest to that with videos, lol...
I have absolutely no fucking clue as to what you are talking about.
It doesn't MATTER if he had or has security. The people shouldn't have been knocking on his door and threatening him.
I am sure you thought you had a point on that post, but for the life of me I can't tell what you thought it was.
I'm lost, is this a off topic thing?
Yes Antifa does when you take there masks and sticks from them and knock them on their ass.
Videos or it didn't happen.
I was hoping SOMEBODY could shed some light on whatever it is he is talking about!
I don't think I did but I guarantee my comment will be deleted as being ……..off topic.
The problem with pseudo-intellectuals is that they always forget that others don't think as they do.
actually an astute comment, !!!
So, because he doesn't have that, he should be accosted at home, along with his family?
Wow...that's just fucking BRILLIANT!
What a commercial for that security system--------"Buy one today or feel the wrath of the progressive left!"
I had no clue that we could shill for companies and products here.
Nope, but if he had that or anything similar, and I'm guessing he can afford a much better system than that,
he would have video and audio with which the police could have identified any trespassers or vandals in the act of defacing his driveway
or protesting without a permit, etc.
Fair and balanced …
You may want to look around the board and read the comments attributing certain behaviors to, i.e.
Heartland..... Tacos.... You're missing the issue entirely.
For conservatives, politics is a set of beliefs about how the country should run.
For "progressives", it's a religion. It's how they decide good from evil, righteous people from unrighteous, and believers from infidels. There is no behavior against the infidels that they consider to be out of bounds or off limits. Most of them see nothing wrong with this, and those that do will attempt to defend it anyway.....because......religion.
And …
Democrat "leaders", if there is such a thing, need to calm down their thuggish mob. Who knows, people with pitchforks and torches might just start showing up at their doors. Such behavior has become standard for the loony left.
And …
The radical left will always find a way to invoke 1A, even when stalking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage occurs:
And …
Just another example of how their self-proclaimed tolerance and respect for all people is not genuine, but just a political tactic. If the politics of a person don't line up with them, their go-to is to attack them based on some immutable characteristic.
NOTE: In this thread, I denounced the act of demonstrating near to and/or on anyone's private residence; but the selectively-indignant among us, comment ONLY on the demonstrations that do not coincide with their politics or ideology.
By all means, denounce all that is inappropriate, illegal, ugly …
BUT DON"T CALL OUT ONE SIDE IN SUCH A WAY AS TO MAKE "OTHER SIDES" WITHOUT SIN.
So tell me when a right wing group went to some liberal politician or celebrities home and yelled and screamed and threatened both the celebrity and his family.
I'll wait!
While you're waiting, instead of selectively pulling out just a part of my comment, after which making it appear as though you a point … quote the portion that answers your disingenuous gotcha' question … namely …
"NOTE: In this thread, I denounced the act of demonstrating near to and/or on anyone's private residence; but the selectively-indignant among us, comment ONLY on the demonstrations that do not coincide with their politics or ideology.
By all means, denounce all that is inappropriate, illegal, ugly … "
But all right … since you're waiting …
In the early 1990s, anti-abortion extremists concluded that murdering providers was the only way to stop abortion. The first provider was murdered in 1993. Including the recent attack in Colorado, there have been 11 murders and 26 attempted murders due to anti-abortion violence.
Several of the doctors were attacked in their own homes. In 2009, NAF member Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed in his church in Wichita, Kansas. In 2015, a police officer and two people at a clinic were killed when a gunman entered a clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
And why limit this to "homes"? In Hebrew and Yiddish, the term for synagogue is …
בית כנסת bet kenesset, 'house of assembly' or בית תפילה bet tefila, "house of prayer", Yiddish: שול shul, Ladino: אסנוגה esnoga or קהל kahal), is a Jewish or Samaritan house of worship.
So spare me the equivocation and the "I'll wait" talking down; when Nazis, Skinheads and white nationalists vote as liberal democrats … do let me know.
Now, I'll wait.
On that we can agree.
I hear that the trespassers, should they be caught, will be charged with a hate crime. All of it sounds good but we really need to start prosecuting these people.
They can be obviously charged with trespassing and vandalism but I'm not seeing how it could be a hate crime. Political affiliation and workplace aren't a protected class. The hate crime specification only comes into play when the crime is based on the victim's race, creed, color, sex/gender, disability, ethnicity, and/or immigration. None of those apply in this situation.
Those that apply are:
Race - caucasian
Creed - conservative
Color - white
Sex/gender - male
Or does it take all seven you listed to qualify?
He was not targeted because he is white, male, or heterosexual and/or CIS. A person's creed refers to their religious affliiation and not their political party.
Maybe you need to learn how hate crimes laws work before you comment? Being a butt-hurt racist moron who wears bow ties isn't a protected class.
Without doubt you are correct.
I might have to create a thread about what is and what isn't a hate crime because it seems that many people do not understand that legal concept.
Look up the definition of creed again, it covers religious and political beliefs.
How many "butt-hurt racist moron"s who wear bow ties need to be attacked and threatened before they can become a "protected class?
What site did you use?
According to the FBI, your political views/affiliation is not a protected class,
Locked until the seeder returns.....
Why? There were all of 15-16 posts here since I went to work this morning none particularly uncivil so why other than it being my seed was that done? I was actually looking at seedable articles when SP locked this not at all busy seed.
SP locked this article for good reason and you unlocked it without permission. 191 comments and you have made 3 while there is a panel of moderation from your lack of moderation. Do that again, and the article will remain closed.
[Removed]
I counted 8 of my posts on the seed and I know I made multiple flags when viewing this seed yesterday. Today it needed no new flags.
You need to be more a part of your articles XX. This is a discussion we have had before. There were a ton of new flags from today and maybe if you were here, you would have known that.
And saying this in public just gave the unscrupulous a way (read tactic) to have a seed or posting knocked down or locked. When the seeder is away, flood it with flags and force the moderators into frustration mode and lock it down......
Interesting.
And all the flags were from prior day posts. There were only sixteen posts Friday from when I went to work and the time it was locked 20 min. before I returned home from work and after work errands like getting gas, going to the bank and grocery store, like having a life.
Hmmm, I would never thought about doing something like that...
But you did.