38 people cited for violations in Clinton email probe

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  just-jim-nc-ttth  •  last year  •  160 comments

38 people cited for violations in Clinton email probe
The State Department has completed its internal investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's use of private email and found violations by 38 people, some of whom may face disciplinary action.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



AAIZxE1.img?h=540&w=799&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f © Associated Press FILE - In this Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018, file photo, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton talks with Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, during The Atlantic Festival, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

The department determined that those 38 people were "culpable" in 91 cases of sending classified information in messages that ended up in Clinton's personal email. The 38 are current and former State Department officials but were not identified in the report that was sent to Congress this week.

The investigation covered 33,000 emails that Clinton turned over for review after her use of the private email account became public. The department said it found a total of 588 violations involving information then or now deemed to be classified, but could not assign fault in 497 cases.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    last year

May be the first of some more as we get further into some future IG reports (I realize this is the State Department). Probably a bunch of wrist slapping but, let's take a look shall we?

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1  It Is ME  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    last year
 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  It Is ME @1.1    last year
It's happening.   jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

You farted? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.2  It Is ME  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    last year

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
lady in black
1.1.3  lady in black  replied to  It Is ME @1.1    last year

It's okay and get over it

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  lady in black @1.1.3    last year

Good one !

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.5  It Is ME  replied to  lady in black @1.1.3    last year
It's okay and get over it

Do you have any Charmin ?

Maybe Grey Poupon ? But only the Dejon type please.

 
 
 
lady in black
1.1.6  lady in black  replied to  It Is ME @1.1.5    last year

No, but I'll give you some tp

61AmV1L8LTL._SL1500_.jpg

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.1.7  dennis smith  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    last year

typical deflection

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
1.1.8  Thrawn 31  replied to  It Is ME @1.1    last year

Who cares? It is Hillary Clinton, move on. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.9  It Is ME  replied to  lady in black @1.1.6    last year

Thanks ! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
lady in black
1.1.10  lady in black  replied to  It Is ME @1.1.9    last year

You're welcome

 
 
 
It Is ME
1.1.11  It Is ME  replied to  lady in black @1.1.10    last year

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Krishna
1.1.12  Krishna  replied to  It Is ME @1.1.9    last year

384

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    last year

38 people certainly goes beyond the 5 given blanket immunity! This will all come out. She got a pass from the FBI in broad daylight. I'm not sure if it gets looked into further, but she deserves a lot of punishment.

 
 
 
lib50
1.2.1  lib50  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    last year

Its hilarious that republicans are still on Hillary's emails and they don't care about Trump's emails, his kids and inlaws, staff, etc do it.  Which they DO.  And they are ok with corruption, from quid pro quo extortion for political purposes to personally profiting off the office (emoluments clause), we've never seen such blatant corruption.  Trump tried to manufacture dirt on dems via Ukraine extortion and you lot don't fucking care one little bit. "Values"?  Or satan's minions?

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.2.2  dennis smith  replied to  lib50 @1.2.1    last year

More deflection. This is about Hillarys emails and as expected you tried to deflect to Trump. Another fail.

 
 
 
lib50
1.2.3  lib50  replied to  dennis smith @1.2.2    last year

Oh, FFS, its about emails and transparency and following the damn law. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  dennis smith @1.2.2    last year
More deflection. This is about Hillarys emails and as expected you tried to deflect to Trump. Another fail.

You know, it almost doesn't even matter anymore what the topic is.

We are virtually guaranteed at least one person will chime in with:

"But Trump!!!!!!!!!!!"

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  lib50 @1.2.1    last year
Its hilarious that republicans are still on Hillary's

Maybe Comey should have conducted a legitimate investigation.

 
 
 
lib50
1.2.6  lib50  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.5    last year

I'm just glad the legitimate investigations are ongoing presently and yielding much rotted low hanging fruit.  Working their way up the chain.  No matter where we are right now, the trajectory is finally moving into unavoidable truths about the corruption in front of our faces.  Its blatant and easy to understand, and more people, especially young, want him investigated and removed from office.  Not going to turn that train around. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.2.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.4    last year

Why not?  Y'all sure do the "But Hillary!!!" enough.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  lib50 @1.2.6    last year
Its blatant and easy to understand

So much so that the people can't see it!

As for legitimate investigations - I got a hunch we hear something Monday - Watch for it!

 
 
 
lib50
1.2.9  lib50  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.8    last year

Ooooo, ok.  After the disaster and possible crime against humanity (Kurds - and morally it IS a crime against humanity), he needs something big.  Hope he doesn't plan to push the nuclear button.  Is that what comes after greenlighting ethnic cleansing?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.10  Vic Eldred  replied to  lib50 @1.2.9    last year
After the disaster and possible crime against humanity (Kurds - and morally it IS a crime against humanity)

Where would Erdogan fit into all of that?


Hope he doesn't plan to push the nuclear button.  

Based upon Donald Trump's three years in office, I think you can stop worrying.


Is that what comes after greenlighting ethnic cleansing?

You may have missed it, but the President arranged a cease-fire between the Turks and Kurds:




It is hard to hold the Turks and Kurds apart. I'm sure it will still be a problem in Trump's second term.

 
 
 
bugsy
1.2.11  bugsy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.10    last year
I'm sure it will still be a problem in Trump's second term.

More than likely his third and fourth terms also.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.12  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.5    last year
Maybe Comey should have conducted a legitimate investigation.

If only the IG of the DOJ would investigate that investigation too. 

Oh wait...

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.13  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @1.2.12    last year

The big "If only" is that new avatar! LMAO!

 
 
 
lib50
1.2.14  lib50  replied to  bugsy @1.2.11    last year

I knew all that teabagging talk about the Constitution was bullshit.  They don't even know what is in it and don't care. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.15  Vic Eldred  replied to  lib50 @1.2.14    last year
They don't even know what is in it and don't care. 

Progressives can't even accept the will of the people. Let's start there!

 
 
 
bugsy
1.2.16  bugsy  replied to  lib50 @1.2.14    last year
I knew all that teabagging talk about the Constitution was bullshit.  They don't even know what is in it and don't care. 

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.17  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.15    last year

Republicans can't even accept that Trump is FUBAR. Let's start THERE.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.18  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @1.2.17    last year

Lib can speak for herself. I thought you were busy trying to censor my satirical seed?

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.19  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.18    last year
Lib can speak for herself.

I know that, I speak for myself. 

I thought you were busy trying to censor my satirical seed?

How is calling you on posting your garbage in the wrong category censoring it Vic? 

Triggered? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.20  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @1.2.19    last year
How is calling you on posting your garbage in the wrong category censoring it Vic? 

It's garbage because you don't like it. Hillary Clinton is garbage. Joe Biden is garbage and oh yes, Reacel Maddow is garbage, but what you were trying to do is censor a seed that you didn't like. I didn't allow it, did I?  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.2.21  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.20    last year

Vic, you have to label a comedy or satire news story with something that identifies it as comedy or satire.  Its not really a difficult concept on this site. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.22  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.20    last year

It's garbage because it's GARBAGE. 

You MOVED your seed, didn't you Vic? 

Being triggered garners no sympathy from me. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.23  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @1.2.22    last year
It's garbage because it's GARBAGE. 

Coming from those who have nothing but impeachment in the toolbox facing an election they know they can't win, it dosen't really mean much.


You MOVED your seed, didn't you Vic? 

Move is the wrong word, a blunder for you. I changed the label. You must hate the fact that we can make changes!


Being triggered garners no sympathy from me. 

You know a lot about "triggered", going back to Nov 8, 2016. What a beautiful night it was. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.2.24  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.23    last year

I have to go for now, so as usual, to those for whom it means so much - you may have the last word.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.2.25  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.23    last year
Coming from those who have nothing but impeachment in the toolbox facing an election they know they can't win, it dosen't really mean much.

First of all, it's just me here Vic, no plural required. 

Secondly, my 'impeachment toolbox' is much more than you've been able to handle. If you COULD, you wouldn't bail on supporting your own comments all the time. 

You know a lot about "triggered",

I know it when I read it. 

going back to Nov 8, 2016. What a beautiful night it was. 

That night was beautiful, I spent it at a bon fire and was in bed long before the numbers were in. 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.26  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    last year

Lock her up🔒!

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.27  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.23    last year

November 8, 2016 was a glorious day and evening!  🎉🎊👏👍😎

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.2.28  MrFrost  replied to  MAGA @1.2.26    last year

Lock her up🔒!

Yea, the right has been screaming that for 25 years now. Pretty funny that the guy that led chants of, "lock her up!!!", is heading for prison. Poetic justice. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2  JohnRussell    last year

LOCK HIM UP

LOCK HIM UP

LOCK HIM UP

Just trying to refer this seed back to the present problems. 

--------------

Lets see ,     .00275   of the 33,000 emails were considered worthy of censure by the investigation cited in the article.  Thats 3 per 1000 for the math challenged.

This is what all the hoopla was about ?  

Hmmm. 

some of whom may face disciplinary action.

some of the 38 people who took part in misuse of .00275 of the emails  MAY get a wrist slap. 

My goodness!

 
 
 
lady in black
2.1  lady in black  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

It's always, but Hillary, but Obama....but when it's Crooked donnie it's okay and get over it....

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.1.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  lady in black @2.1    last year
It's always, but Hillary, but Obama....but when it's Crooked donnie it's okay and get over it....

But Trump aside, this is a news story. Plain and simple and nothing more. While I know it isn't anti Trump, which it seems at least two here can't fathom ANYTHING else being news worthy, tough shit. Don't like it? Don't read. Thanks.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1.2  KDMichigan  replied to  lady in black @2.1    last year
.but when it's Crooked donnie it's okay and get over it....

It always amazes me that even though there are 10 posts seeded  about President Trump people always have to whine about Trump on the one that isn't about him. It's pretty sad actually.

256

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.1.3  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.2    last year
10 posts seeded  about President Trump people always have to whine about Trump on the one that isn't about him. It's pretty sad actually.

Yes it is...............

256

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.1    last year

This was billed for years as the greatest scandal in human history. 

Not so much, eh? 

 
 
 
lady in black
2.1.5  lady in black  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.2    last year

Time to get new material, that's older than dirt.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.1.6  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.4    last year

To you, obviously not. Me either but, I wonder what was in those 588 cases. Don't you? Oh hell. What am I saying.jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
lady in black
2.1.7  lady in black  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.2    last year

1p49b5.jpg

 
 
 
lady in black
2.1.8  lady in black  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.3    last year

trump-supporters-we-want-a-non-politician-hillarys-emails-benghazi-5900462.png

 
 
 
lady in black
2.1.9  lady in black  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.2    last year

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQQVtSX5Ehig6OAe4Zit7MDavN0x6Hh5RTIwaf1cQVYb95VIqSp

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.1.10  It Is ME  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.4    last year
Not so much, eh? 

Seems it's actually being worked on ….for a "Change".

Give it time . jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.1.11  KDMichigan  replied to  lady in black @2.1.5    last year
Time to get new material, that's older than dirt.  

I use it where it is appropriate, 

 
 
 
lady in black
2.1.12  lady in black  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.11    last year

trump-fourth-grade-level-57e602863df78c690f3517ee.jpg

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.13  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.6    last year

If it was something serious, we would have been told about it.   Do I want to know what they talked about in day to day business of the state dept.? Not really. Im not a conspiracy nut. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.1.14  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.13    last year
Im not a conspiracy nut. 

A conspiracy nut being someone who believes a Democratic member of Congress is a secret Russian plant to destroy the Democratic Party in 2020? Is that how big of a conspiracy nut we are talking about?

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.1.15  dennis smith  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.4    last year

By who?

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.1.16  dennis smith  replied to  lady in black @2.1.12    last year

Nothing of substance just another dismal try to deflect from the topic.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.2  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

What about ............

"91 cases of sending classified information in messages that ended up in Clinton's personal email"

doesn't bother you?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2    last year

doesn't bother you?

not when we have Donny sucking

all the crazy out of the asylum 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.2.3  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.2    last year

But Trump.

jrSmiley_30_smiley_image.gif

And really?? April, May, and July? What do you think has come of those? Got anything more recent or were those just red meat? Perhaps more nothing berders?

 
 
 
Dulay
2.2.5  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2    last year

What about...

"Although the report identified violations, it said investigators had found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information."

Oh and how many of those 'violations' were for retroactively classified documents? There is no fucking way they are going to get away with disciplining people or denying security clearances for Ex Post Facto bullshit. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.2.6  KDMichigan  replied to  Dulay @2.2.5    last year
Oh and how many of those 'violations' were for retroactively classified documents?

Who gives a shit if it was one or 20? 

The Hillaryious Hillary got a pass and everyone knows it. Incompetence is not a excuse.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.2.7  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @2.2.6    last year
Who gives a shit if it was one or 20? 

I do. Ex Post Facto penalties are verboten. 

 
 
 
Dulay
2.2.8  Dulay  replied to  KDMichigan @2.2.6    last year

Oh and BTFW, wanna bet that Hillary Clinton isn't on that list? 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
2.2.9  Freedom Warrior  replied to  Dulay @2.2.7    last year

Well the number was actually countless so put that in your file and do nothing as always

 
 
 
Dulay
2.2.10  Dulay  replied to  Freedom Warrior @2.2.9    last year
Well the number was actually countless so put that in your file and do nothing as always

So all those numbers in the seed are fabricated. Got ya. 

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
2.2.11  Freedom Warrior  replied to  Dulay @2.2.10    last year

It’s better known as the sampling, fabricated is something somebody unwilling  to except the truth would say

 
 
 
Dulay
2.2.12  Dulay  replied to  Freedom Warrior @2.2.11    last year
It’s better known as the sampling,

So all those numbers in the seed are just 'the sampling' so that would make the seeded article irrelevant. Got ya. 

fabricated is something somebody unwilling  to except the truth would say

Actually, fabricated is something someone who has an understanding of the English language would say. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.3  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

"The department said it found a total of 588 violations involving information then or now deemed to be classified, but could not assign fault in 497 cases."

588, for the math challenged, is 1.8% of 33,000. They just could not ASSIGN fault in all the cases meaning, they didn't know who was responsible.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3    last year

You're right, my figure pertains to the ones which were assigned fault. 

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.2  lady in black  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3    last year

And Crooked donnie did quid pro quo, lies every day, but you seem more concerned about Hillary's emails. jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.3.3  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  lady in black @2.3.2    last year

No quid pro quo and everyone knows he lies. You seem to be more concerned about his lies than what classified information was in those cases. I guess that is what TDS does. 

"Liberalism is a disease that gets worse over time. Thus the term progressive."

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.3.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.3    last year
You seem to be more concerned about his lies than what classified information was in those cases.

I am far more worried that Rudy Giuliani , Trump's personal envoy to the world, is a full blown conspiracy nut  than some State Dept personnel exchanged run of the mill emails with Clinton.  Yes, you are correct. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.3.6  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.5    last year

What does Giuliani have to do with this article (except as a useful deflection shield)? And run of the mill? Classified is run of the mill to you? 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.3.7  KDMichigan  replied to  lady in black @2.3.2    last year
And Crooked donnie did quid pro quo,

256

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.4    last year
You have evidence of that?

how much fricken evidence do you need  WTF already.

His Secretary of Stated it live on TV...? 

Trump called out for Ukraine and China to illegally investigate Trumps political opponent, again on live TV, what can't you see ,

the Forest blocked by all the TREASON

as Trump CONTINUES TO AID AND ABBETT OUR ENEMIES !

Who benefited from his call to Turkey again,

besides  IRAN, SYRIA, an autocratic leader of TURKEY, and 

as far fathomed as it might again oh so coincidentally might be,

PUTIN"S RUSSIA !

Wow, how did that ever happen...YET AGAIN !

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.11  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.10    last year
misspoke

by stating that They DID via the definition of Quid pro Quo .

.

Really ???? Misspoke     ??????

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.13  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.12    last year

Are you now calling the President of Ukraine a liar?

YEP !

The Ukrainian leader is involved in a war with Russia, $390,000,000.00 million dollars worth of Military Aid was at stake.

.

It was so frckn obvious what Trump was stating, even Trump defenders should have been able to decode it.

It's a good thing Trump NEVER LIES, so as you can continue to believe

his lies, and you actually wonder,

where lies the problem here...

don't wonder to far, as you are seemingly already very lost,

our condolences.

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.14  lady in black  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.3    last year

thumb_did-you-know-that-1-out-of-3-trump-supporters-39308710.png

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.15  lady in black  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.4    last year

Yes, Mick Mulvaney's press conference...duh

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.17  lady in black  replied to  KDMichigan @2.3.7    last year

1a7e2affaefb48cd277ff99f0abeeb63.jpg

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.19  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.18    last year

Oh, by the way, Mulvaney has corrected his mistake.

when is America going to ?

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.20  lady in black  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.18    last year

Cat is OUT OF THE BAG, Genie is OUT OF THE BOTTLE...too bad you can't grasp that fact.  GET OVER IT

 
 
 
pat wilson
2.3.22  pat wilson  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.18    last year
Oh, by the way, Mulvaney has corrected his mistake.

Yeah, he told the truth the first time and had to correct it with lies. Get over it, right ?

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.23  lady in black  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.18    last year

170c565216e357a47251b9a31bd37894.jpg

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.25  lady in black  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.24    last year

[Deleted HE] SAID IT, GET OVER IT.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.26  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.24    last year
ongratulations on discovering a great way to make friends and influence people

should we take the Trump/Kurds and weigh ?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.28  igknorantzrulz  replied to    last year

stop hypnotizing us wally

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
2.3.29  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.12    last year
Are you now calling the President of Ukraine a liar?

You have to ask if the president of Ukraine is a liar?  Does a wild bear crap in the freaking woods???!??

The man let himself be dog-walked by Donald Trump on live television.  If one man lets another man do that to him, I guarantee that his 'truth' comes directly from the man holding the leash.

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.3.30  MrFrost  replied to  lady in black @2.3.14    last year

512

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.31  lady in black  replied to  MrFrost @2.3.30    last year

2hvmqg.jpg

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2.3.32  Vic Eldred  replied to  lady in black @2.3.31    last year

0922%20antifa.jpg?alias=standard_900x600
We support democrats because we hate America!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.3.33  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.32    last year
We support democrats because we hate America!

Who, the Republicans ??

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.34  lady in black  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.32    last year

Republicans hate America

1a-15.jpg

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.3.35  dennis smith  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.3.9    last year

Trump is the POTUS no matter how you try to deflect every article to him even when it is about something totally different. 

That is one of the main reason he will be the POTUS for 8 years.

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.3.36  dennis smith  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.3.11    last year

Misspoke is the excuse the Dems used for Obama and Biden throughout 8 years.

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.3.37  dennis smith  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.3.19    last year

in Nov 2020 when he House will no longer have a Dem majority

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.3.38  dennis smith  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.3.29    last year

When someone says "I guarantee it" or "Trust me" sane people do just the opposite.

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.3.39  MrFrost  replied to  lady in black @2.3.34    last year

512

Note the red MAGA hat being worn by a white supremacist. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.3.40  MrFrost  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.18    last year
Oh, by the way, Mulvaney has corrected his mistake.

How do you take back a quid pro quo? It happened, he admitted it, the call logs prove it, the WB report says it, trump said it happened, then repeated the request on live TV 2 days later, rudy admitted it live on CNN...... I mean, how much more proof do you fucking need? I promise you this much, if it was Hillary or Obama, you would have been screaming it was 100% true from the rooftops at the first HINT that there was a quid pro quo, (withholding funding unless the Ukraine gives up dirt on a political rival). 

You aren't stupid so give it a rest. There is NO amount of spin that can excuse what Mulvaney said. Rudy said the same thing, so they BOTH misspoke? C'mon man. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.3.41  MrFrost  replied to  dennis smith @2.3.37    last year

in Nov 2020 when he House will no longer have a Dem majority

Yea, we heard the same thing in 2018, how did that turn out? 

 
 
 
lady in black
2.3.42  lady in black  replied to  MrFrost @2.3.40    last year

Sad that some are deaf, dumb and blind to the truth when it is staring them right in the face...

 
 
 
bugsy
2.3.43  bugsy  replied to  XDm9mm @2.3.16    last year
By the way, your spelling and grammar are getting better.

You think so? It looks more hit and miss to me, and it seems to get far worse the more he gets his ass handed to him.

 
 
 
lib50
2.3.44  lib50  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.3    last year
No quid pro quo and everyone knows he lies.

Lol, your statement is screaming to everybody 'TRUMP DID QUID PRO QUO'!  Because....everyone knows he lies. 

 
 
 
MAGA
2.3.45  MAGA  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.3.19    last year

We didn’t make a mistake in 2016.  We chose wisely and we will repeat our wisdom in 2020.

 
 
 
Krishna
2.3.46  Krishna  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.3.32    last year

256

And what about these?

384

They are not Making America Great Again!

LOCK THEM UP, LOCK THEM UP!!!

(Hehehe jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png )

 
 
 
Dulay
2.3.47  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @2.3.45    last year
We didn’t make a mistake in 2016.  

By 'we' I presume you mean YOU. 

We chose wisely and we will repeat our wisdom in 2020.

So will you be voting for Gary Johnson again? 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2.3.48  Vic Eldred  replied to  Krishna @2.3.46    last year

They would stand a better chance of being convicted by a fuckin DC jury than would antifa thugs.

 
 
 
Ronin2
2.4  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

You didn't know it was a crime to pass classified information on an unsecure server? 

How soon they forget.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

see ,     .00275   of the 33,000 emails were considered worthy of censure by the investigation cited in the article.  Thats 3 per 1000 for the math challenged.

This is what all the hoopla was about 

Wow.  Is that the new standard? Donald Trump made tens of thousands of phone calls. Only one has been considered worthy of a kinda sorta impeachment inquiry.  What's all the hoopla about?

Sometimes, I'm legitimately stunned by how ludicrous progressives are willing to make themselves appear. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.5    last year

When you have examined all of Trump's communications , phone calls, notes scribbled with crayon, whispers in the ear , papers slipped under the table, etc, then we will have a data base to compare. How many calls has he made on his private phone from the residence that we have no idea what was said?

Your comparison is silly. They examined every one of Hillarys emails with a fine tooth comb, not once or twice but repeatedly. 

After they have examined Trump over and over lets see what we have. 

 
 
 
Dulay
2.5.2  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.5    last year
Wow.  Is that the new standard? Donald Trump made tens of thousands of phone calls. Only one has been considered worthy of a kinda sorta impeachment inquiry.  What's all the hoopla about?

Well since the new standard is that every communication is hashed and rehashed, we'll have to listen to ALL of those calls, interview everyone that Trump talked to, listen to them again and then retroactively criminalize whatever the fuck we want. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
2.5.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.5.1    last year

Sure John. Issue a subpoena for those  records then  Trump can just go ahead and delete all records that he chooses not to turn over  and claim they are just calls with Melania about doing yoga.  That would make it a fair comparison. 

what else do you apply this standard to? If you use a bank a few thousand times and only rob it once, does that mean the robbery  isn't a problem? 

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.6  dennis smith  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

1 email is too many John. 

 
 
 
lib50
2.6.1  lib50  replied to  dennis smith @2.6    last year

Why don't you feel the same about Trump's emails and phone calls?  Since Hillary is just a private citizen and given what Pompeo is currently doing, what the fuck?

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.6.2  Texan1211  replied to  lib50 @2.6.1    last year
Why don't you feel the same about Trump's emails 

But Trump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
bugsy
2.6.3  bugsy  replied to  Texan1211 @2.6.2    last year

What I find funny as hell is that EVERYTHING liberals are accusing, without evidence, and only by their feelings, Trump of doing, liberals and democrats have DONE themselves.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.6.4  Texan1211  replied to  bugsy @2.6.3    last year

Straight out of The Alinsky Rules!

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.6.5  It Is ME  replied to  Texan1211 @2.6.4    last year
Straight out of The Alinsky Rules!

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.7  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

Seems like quite a few for someone who repeatedly claimed to have had no classified information either sent by her or sent to her on her own little private server.

 
 
 
lib50
2.7.1  lib50  replied to  Texan1211 @2.7    last year

Seems like quite a few are only interested in going back to Hillary and ignoring everything Trump is CURRENTLY doing himself, his family, his cabinet and staff.  So either care or not, but have a fucking standard for yourselves or quit bitching when its called out.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.7.2  Texan1211  replied to  lib50 @2.7.1    last year
everything Trump is CURRENTLY doing himself, 

But Trump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Weak sauce as usual.

 
 
 
lib50
2.7.3  lib50  replied to  Texan1211 @2.7.2    last year

Yeah, because old shit is way more important than the mess the current president is making.  So, what about those standards again?  Care about the right, or only the left?  I actually expect everybody to hold them, not just Trump.  Notice how none of you or any spokesholes actually answer that question.  Its pertinent to any discussion, do you hold yourselves to the same standard or not?

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.7.4  Texan1211  replied to  lib50 @2.7.3    last year

I am sure you can get your fix of "I Hate Trump" on one of JR's seeds. Why come here whining about Trump when it is painfully obvious that he is NOT the topic here, no matter how many times you yell "BUT TRUMP!!!!!"

 
 
 
KDMichigan
2.7.5  KDMichigan  replied to  Texan1211 @2.7.4    last year

256

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
2.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

"But Trump!!!!!!!!!!!"

 
 
 
evilgenius
3  evilgenius    last year
The department determined that those 38 people were "culpable" in 91 cases of sending classified information...

From what has been reported in the last several years this is normal Tuesday at the State Department.

 
 
 
MrFrost
4  MrFrost    last year

Meh, big deal. Compared to what trump has done since he has been in office, this is literally nothing. Besides..

I don't really care, do you? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.2  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @4    last year

"But Trump!!!!!!!"

 
 
 
Krishna
4.2.1  Krishna  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    last year
"But Trump!!!!!!!"

Time for a change!

320

 
 
 
Sunshine
5  Sunshine    last year

Comey told the entire world she is an incompetent dumbass.  jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
bbl-1
5.1  bbl-1  replied to  Sunshine @5    last year

No he did not.  But he did say that about Trump.

 
 
 
Freedom Warrior
5.1.1  Freedom Warrior  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1    last year

Should I play the video for you let it sink in for a bit and then come back and torture you with the truth

 
 
 
bbl-1
5.1.2  bbl-1  replied to  Freedom Warrior @5.1.1    last year

play it.

 
 
 
MrFrost
5.2  MrFrost  replied to  Sunshine @5    last year

Comey told the entire world she is an incompetent dumbass. 

Pretty sure Comey is a dude. 

 
 
 
bbl-1
6  bbl-1    last year

The Hillary gig is brought out again.  And will become louder until it fades into the silence of the 'pipsqueak' holding the burning marshmallow on the end of a stick. 

A clear indication that the dirty Russian money is------well, it just is.

It ( the dirty Russian money ) is deeper than the crap on the stick of dip.  Hell, learned tonight that the great Rudy Giuliani took a date to the G.H.W.Bush funeral and the 'date' was Lev Parnas.  Holy Crackers.  You've got to joking. 

 
 
 
nightwalker
7  nightwalker    last year

Haven't we gone over this a few times already?

Mighty handy to reclassify information that WASN'T classified at all, to be reclassified as "top secret" or "sensitive" after it's been out there, unclassified for months to years?

And even handier to then scream about all that "top secret" information. If this "investigation" wasn't being desperately pushed by the GOP (to keep fueling the less than intelligent base) it would never have been any issue at all.

No, nobody will be "punished" it wasn't top secret information then so it wasn't any kind of crime, it's still useless dated information no matter how hard the GOP try to make it sound like it was "tip-top secret" now.

More brainless beating of a long, long dead horse.

 
 
 
MrFrost
8  MrFrost    last year

From the article...

Although the report identified violations, it said investigators had found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information."

So what's this make, the 5th failed attempt by the nutters to find something about emails that will stick? 

"Insanity---The act of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result." 

Also, I read the story over on fox, it says the same thing. 

 
 
 
PJ
9  PJ    last year

Yep, it's about that time.  The campaign season has started but I'm totally disappointed..........Why only bring up Hilary?  Where's the story about Bill?  

Another pathetic thread about a Clinton.  But I have high hopes that there will be threads popping up about that uppity black President soon. 

giphy.gif

 
 
 
KDMichigan
9.1  KDMichigan  replied to  PJ @9    last year
Why only bring up Hilary? 

Why does Hillaryious Hillary go on tours seeking attention?

You think she will ever run again?

256

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
10  Paula Bartholomew    last year

Lock anyone up that has or is currently breaking a law no matter what party they belong to. 

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

Texan1211
CB
devangelical
Dulay


52 visitors