╌>

Tucker Carlson Rallies to Demon Sperm Doc’s Defense

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  4 years ago  •  49 comments

By:   Justin Baragona, The Daily Beast

Tucker Carlson Rallies to Demon Sperm Doc’s Defense

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Tucker Carlson Rallies to Demon Sperm Doc’s Defense





Justin Baragona


63bb9d90-bb4c-11ea-bedf-3bfe90bc44a5 July 28, 2020, 10:33 PM









b924a0b12776c65ea265b91817e9805a


Fox News host Tucker Carlson   continued his contrarian stance   on the coronavirus pandemic on Tuesday night, defending a viral video of fringe doctors peddling COVID-19 falsehoods and claiming the group was only attacked because they criticized the “sainted” Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Hours after   President Donald Trump doubled down   on his support for the doctors—including   eccentric pediatrician Dr. Stella Immanuel , who has previously said “demon sperm” causes gynecological ailments—Carlson kicked off his primetime program by railing against social media platforms for cracking down on the video’s disinformation.

The video, livestreamed by far-right digital outlet Breitbart on Monday,   featured a press “summit” funded by right-wing political group Tea Party Patriots . Prior to being taken down by Facebook, the video racked up nearly 20 million views on Monday evening. Besides claiming controversial anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine could prevent and even “cure” coronavirus, “America’s Frontline Doctors” also said masks and social distancing were unnecessary to prevent the spread of the virus.

Claiming that there’s an “incentive” for Democrats to have coronavirus cause “more damage” as it hurts Trump politically, the Fox News star tied the removal of the video to the 2020 presidential election, claiming it was only taken down because Trump retweeted it and that “enraged Democrats.”


“Any scientific advancement that reduces the suffering of Americans in the election year is a threat to Joe Biden’s campaign so they decided to pull the video off the internet,” Carlson huffed.


After comparing social media companies to “Chinese authorities,” Carlson told his viewers that he works for “one of the very few mass media companies” not controlled by Google and Facebook and therefore would show them clips from the video.

Reiterating his belief that the video was only removed to help presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden win, Carlson aired comments from Immanuel excitedly declaring that the “cure for COVID” is hydroxychloroquine.

“Dr. Immanuel’s claim is harder for us to endorse,” Carlson said. “Is hydroxychloroquine part of the cure for the coronavirus? We don’t know the answer. We do know that many front-line physicians around the world have prescribed hydroxychloroquine and continue to prescribe it.”

Recent studies and trials, however, have shown that the anti-malaria drug is not effective in preventing or treating coronavirus. The Federal Drug Administration has also rescinded emergency use for the medication as a treatment, citing potential deadly side effects.

After saying the “science is not settled” on the drug—Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel would tell Carlson later in the program that hydroxychloroquine has shown little benefit—the Fox host claimed Immanuel was facing backlash because she criticized Fauci, the face of the White House’s coronavirus task force.

“That clip enraged them. Because above all, you must never mock the sainted Anthony Fauci,” Carlson said after airing Immanuel’s anti-Fauci remarks. “Under no circumstances can you note that Dr. Fauci is, in fact, very often a hypocritical buffoon who refuses to admit what he clearly doesn’t know.”

“If you say that out loud they will cancel you,” he continued. “Fauci is too useful to the Biden campaign, so until November, Fauci’s word must be law even if it doesn’t make sense. Criticize Fauci and you will disappear from the internet.”

Besides taking   more gratuitous shots   at Fauci, Carlson also took aim at this publication for reporting on Immanuel’s many bizarre claims, such as her beliefs that doctors use “alien DNA” in medications and that the government is overrun by “reptilian” aliens.

“Google’s countless toadies online did the cleanup work, the ugly stuff,” Carlson groused. “The Daily Beast attacked Dr. Immanuel for getting her medical degree in Africa and then suggested she believed in witchcraft—because you know Africans do that, right?! Huh.”

He went on to claim that while the Beast is fine with “political correctness” most of the time, this outlet was “happy” to help destroy Immanuel because it is an election season.

The Houston-based pediatrician and minister appeared unfazed, however, even publicly   thanking this outlet   for doing a "great job summarizing" her work.

Carlson’s shot at The Daily Beast comes just a few weeks after this publication reported   that Fox News staffers have become incensed   over the racist rhetoric and “white supremacist crap” aired nightly on his show. And earlier this month, Carlson went on a “pre-planned vacation” days after his head writer resigned when he was outed as an outspoken racist.





Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Tessylo    4 years ago

After comparing social media companies to “Chinese authorities,” Carlson told his viewers that he works for “one of the very few mass media companies” not controlled by Google and Facebook and therefore would show them clips from the video.

Reiterating his belief that the video was only removed to help presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden win, Carlson aired comments from Immanuel excitedly declaring that the “cure for COVID” is hydroxychloroquine.

“Dr. Immanuel’s claim is harder for us to endorse,” Carlson said. “Is hydroxychloroquine part of the cure for the coronavirus? We don’t know the answer. We do know that many front-line physicians around the world have prescribed hydroxychloroquine and continue to prescribe it.”

Recent studies and trials, however, have shown that the anti-malaria drug is not effective in preventing or treating coronavirus. The Federal Drug Administration has also rescinded emergency use for the medication as a treatment, citing potential deadly side effects.

After saying the “science is not settled” on the drug—Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel would tell Carlson later in the program that hydroxychloroquine has shown little benefit—the Fox host claimed Immanuel was facing backlash because she criticized Fauci, the face of the White House’s coronavirus task force.

“That clip enraged them. Because above all, you must never mock the sainted Anthony Fauci,” Carlson said after airing Immanuel’s anti-Fauci remarks. “Under no circumstances can you note that Dr. Fauci is, in fact, very often a hypocritical buffoon who refuses to admit what he clearly doesn’t know.”

“If you say that out loud they will cancel you,” he continued. “Fauci is too useful to the Biden campaign, so until November, Fauci’s word must be law even if it doesn’t make sense. Criticize Fauci and you will disappear from the internet.”

Besides taking      more gratuitous shots       at Fauci, Carlson also took aim at this publication for reporting on Immanuel’s many bizarre claims, such as her beliefs that doctors use “alien DNA” in medications and that the government is overrun by “reptilian” aliens.

“Google’s countless toadies online did the cleanup work, the ugly stuff,” Carlson groused. “The Daily Beast attacked Dr. Immanuel for getting her medical degree in Africa and then suggested she believed in witchcraft—because you know Africans do that, right?! Huh.”

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Guide
1.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Tessylo @1    4 years ago

Interesting that Tucker and the far right lemmings would put such confidence in someone that got her degree from "From some 3rd world S#!t-Hole."

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1    4 years ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.2  evilone  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.1    4 years ago

It's a blatant display of confirmation bias.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @1    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2    4 years ago

I'm tired of your nonsense instagram posts.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.1    4 years ago

I hope you're flagging them. I will if you don't want to

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Kavika   replied to  Tessylo @1.2.1    4 years ago

He posts instagram links because thinking may be a bridge to far.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.1    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.5  XXJefferson51  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.2    4 years ago

Just like the social media progressives love to censor what they complain about.  The pro HCQ doctors were right.  They should not have been censored.  Congresspersons should have grilled them harder about this bigotry yesterday than they did.  Long live HCQ and it’s advocates!  Hydrochloroquiene forever!  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.5    4 years ago

You really need to learn the difference between corporate censorship and government censorship.

For someone who brags about how much he loves the Constitution and America and knows every word of the Constitution, you actually know very little

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.7  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.4    4 years ago

So these quack doctors are victims of censorship and repression?  How is it censorship to remove blatant propaganda and lies?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.8  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.5    4 years ago
Just like the social media progressives love to censor what they complain about.

The video of them is everywhere, they are speaking their message, can that really be described as "censorship"? Just like young earthers, flat earthers and other hilariously foolish morons, their message is being exposed and condemned for the horse shit it is. That is not censorship, it's simply the vast majority of public opinion rejecting mentally incompetent conspiracy theorists.

Besides, unless it's government censorship, it's not only completely legal, it's every private citizens right and freedom to reject ignorant proposals and ideas. And if they own media companies they have every right to reject being used as platform or soapbox for some vile dumb ass to spit their poison.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
1.2.9  bbl-1  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.5    4 years ago

Sort of like waking up with a 'hard on' and not know whose it was-----or something like that, MAGA whatever?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.10  XXJefferson51  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.6    4 years ago

I have more contempt for corporate gate keeping, fact checking, and censorship/ content control even than I do of state, local, or federal governments doing it.  It is intellectually lazy and morally evil regardless of who does it, how it is done, or where it is done.  There is no rational or legitimate justification for it anywhere

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.11  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.7    4 years ago

It was neither lies nor propaganda.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.12  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.8    4 years ago

And yet the mainstream media does that for secular progressives every day...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.13  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.12    4 years ago
And yet the mainstream media does that for secular progressives every day...

I suppose even sunlight would be considered "poison" to a virus. Secular progressives are merely shining a light on the corrupt puss filled infectious underbelly of right wing conservative ideology, so no doubt those being uncovered would be upset by having their sick ideology exposed and sanitized.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.10    4 years ago

You're wrong. If you don't like corporations control or censor, then don't buy their products. Jesus Christ! I thought you were a capitalist!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.17  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2.11    4 years ago
"It was neither lies nor propaganda."

Of course it was.  You repeating the same statement over and over again, does not make it so.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.18  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.2.14    4 years ago
"You're wrong. If you don't like corporations control or censor, then don't buy their products. Jesus Christ! I thought you were a capitalist!"
"I have more contempt for corporate gate keeping, fact checking, and censorship/ content control even than I do of state, local, or federal governments doing it.  It is intellectually lazy and morally evil regardless of who does it, how it is done, or where it is done.  There is no rational or legitimate justification for it anywhere"

He also disagrees with fact checking!

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

So you have no problem with 'government censorship' but you do with private companies' control over their own business???????????????

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.19  seeder  Tessylo  replied to    4 years ago
"Not if they control 90 percent of all internet traffic that is a monopoly and monopoly’s need to be broken up that is true capitalism."

They do not 'control' internet traffic.  You still OBVIOUSLY don't get what a monopoly is.  

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
1.2.20  Raven Wing  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.19    4 years ago

He obviously is only trying to pull your chain and piss you off. And if he really don't know the difference, all your efforts are useless. Just ignore it and move on.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.2.22  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.18    4 years ago

He also disagrees with fact checking!

He probably won't even watch Dragnet because of the catch phrase..."Just the facts mamn/sir, just the facts."

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Tessylo    4 years ago

It appears tRump supporters take the word of this witch doctor/quack over an experienced doctor/scientist/researcher.  

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Guide
2.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Tessylo @2    4 years ago

It goes along with their Alien DNA conspiracy theories.....

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
2.2  Raven Wing  replied to  Tessylo @2    4 years ago
take the word of this witch doctor/quack over an experienced doctor/scientist/researcher.

They promote this fraud while calling Fauci a liar and know-nothing. Typical of much of the GOP. It shows how much they accept Trumps lies over anyone who speaks the truth. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @2    4 years ago

We do.  We stand by HCQ.  Period.  It is an effective early treatment for China flu

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.3.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.3    4 years ago
It is an effective early treatment for China flu

Don't know what it does for the China flu, but it has proven ineffective, and even deadly, against Covid-19.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.3    4 years ago

This quack witch doctor claims to have treated hundreds of patients with this and other drugs.  

She has a strip mall office in Texas I believe, Sister Mary did some research on it.

Thanks Sister!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.3.1    4 years ago

It only causes problems if given too late into the disease.  If given within seven days of being diagnosed it cuts the death rate of the China virus in half.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.2    4 years ago

There was a lot more than one doctor in that wonderful Breitbart video that social media cowardly censored.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Expert
2.3.5  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.3    4 years ago

That is demonstrably false and and the scientific literature does not support that assertion. So claiming it's effective when it's not is misleading at best and lying at worst!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Tessylo    4 years ago

"Besides taking           more gratuitous shots               at Fauci, Carlson also took aim at this publication for reporting on Immanuel’s many bizarre claims, such as her beliefs that doctors use “alien DNA” in medications and that the government is overrun by “reptilian” aliens.

“Google’s countless toadies online did the cleanup work, the ugly stuff,” Carlson groused. “ The Daily Beast attacked Dr. Immanuel for getting her medical degree in Africa and then suggested she believed in witchcraft—because you know Africans do that, right?! Huh.”  jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

This crazy witch is facing criticism because she is a crazy witch.  

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
4  freepress    4 years ago

At this point Voodoo is all they have and it just goes to show how cult like and brainwashed Fox has made people who  foolishly embrace and buy into this crap.

Can you even IMAGINE if Obama had embraced a voodoo witch doctor saying idiotic nonsense? Trump is publicly tweeting out support of this literal demon doctor, but when questioned Trump ran away from reporters calling him out on it. When Trump was questioned again he doubled down and repeated support of this nonsense.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  freepress @4    4 years ago
Can you even IMAGINE if Obama had embraced a voodoo witch doctor saying idiotic nonsense?

I can imagine the racist nonsense that would come spewing out of right wingers mouths

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1    4 years ago

We are going to pit it out in every conservative media outlet so you’ll have to censor all of them in order to shut us up.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.1    4 years ago

I don't give a fuck about conservative media. You go right ahead and tune in to them. Doesn't bother me.

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
4.1.3  Veronica  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.2    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
4.1.4  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.2    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6  bbl-1    4 years ago

"Demon sperm?"  There it is.  There you have it.  Conservatism defined.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bbl-1 @6    4 years ago

Demon sperm would explain Ivanka, Eric, and Don Jr.

 
 

Who is online





98 visitors