Trump Says Let Democratic Cities Rot
Karen Tumulty
@ktumulty
Have we lost our capacity to be shocked? The President of the United States -- who is supposed to lead an entire nation -- just retweeted someone urging "Leave Democrat cities. Let them rot."
===================================================================================
Brandon Friedman
@BFriedmanDC
"Leave Democrat cities. Let them rot." This is from the commander-in-chief, the President of the United States, further confirming that we are presently in a cold civil war.
========================================================================================
related
Sunday afternoon, President Donald Trump retweeted a tweet posted by a supporter that called for Democrat-led cities to be abandoned and left to rot.
The original tweet was posted by Brandon Straka , a pro-Trump activist who made headlines in June for getting banned from American Airlines for refusing to wear a face mask . Straka’s tweet shared a video clip purporting to show protesters in New York City’s Times Square.
“Leave Democrat cities,” wrote Straka. “Let them rot. The media and @TheDemocrats have activated this mental illness and it’s going to get more and more people hurt and killed.”
Tags
Who is online
48 visitors
We have no president.
Dishonest Donald certainly is not the President for all of us. And that's not claiming he's not President, of course he is. He simply caters to his base and no one else. It's rather funny to me as these rural white southern and Midwest folk bitch and moan about being forgotten by the "coastal elites" but as soon as they're in power they work effortlessly to exclude and de-fund their opponents as if it's a zero sum game where they have to diminish and exterminate their opposition instead of recognizing that liberals, progressives, minorities, lgtbq Americans are just as American as they are and deserving of every right that they claim they deserve. When progressives are in power they try to help everyone in need which simply isn't so of their right wing counterparts. In fact many on the right bitch and moan about progressives while filing for and receiving the entitlements that progressives fought to get them.
We'd be BETTER THE FCK OFF
Nope, not for almost four years now.
He’s exactly right. Or as the NYTimes once wrote: Ford to big Apple: DROP DEAD! If the local governments of them are going to be corrupt and not maintain services and law and order, those who can should get out of them.
The Trump administration has been the most corrupt administration in modern history.
No amount of Heartland Institute far right wing propaganda can change that fact.
Trump is the 'virus' that keeps on making us all sick! The health of this nation is intermingled between all it's people! There is no "united" states once the bond is severed!
[deleted]
[Deleted]
[Deleted] No where did I call for the extermination of anyone.
How is letting Democratic run shit holes that allow rioters, looters, and arsonists fend for themselves fascist? If they want to let their shit hole cities burn, then so be it.
Want fascist try shutting down free speech. Which party is backing groups trying to do just that?
Who is shutting down free speech ? That's a bit melodramatic.
You understand that protesting is the root of free speech? Trump is the only one trying to shut down protesters.
No he is trying to shut down rioters. I doubt he would intervene at all if it weren't for the riots, mayhem, and destruction.
Video evidence shows otherwise.
Do Hooterville and Pixlie in red state flyover country have great leaders or do we just never hear about those poor godforsaken hell holes of the deep South, plains states and Midwest?
There are reasons cities do not elect throwbacks!
"Let them burn"? One, our cities are not burning and two, no wonder the gop is popular as anal warts!
Wow, does he realize that Phoenix, Tuscon, Denver, Dallas, Austin, Houston, Albuquerque, Las Vegas, Boston, Honolulu, Long Beach, Tampa, Orlando, Cincinnati are democratic cities and that's just for starters,
Sounds like he wants a very large portion of the US to rot.
This is an interesting graph. In 2020 of the top100 cities in the US. 29 had Republican mayors, 64 Democratic and 7 Independent.
I hope the people that are agreeing with trmp here on NT aren't from cities like Miami, Atlanta, Little Rock, St Louis, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, etc
Statements like trumps proves just how divisive he is. I can't even imagine the outrage if Obama had said, "let the red states go broke and rot". Of course he would never say that because all the red states are already broke.
And Straka is a former democrat who started the walk away movement from the democrat party over the issues within that party.
And yet it’s the blue ones and their cities seeking a trillion dollar bail out in Congress right now.
You want your city to rot?
We the people, in order to from a more perfect union....
Ahh fuck that. Go team go!
There is no such thing as the walk away movement.
East St Louis is the most rotten-to-the-core city I've ever been to.
Generally-speaking cities don't suffer from wildfires (as do rural areas). Unless of course, the authorities abuse their powers over the people. Different issues move people differently.
Send your liberals my way.
Here too. My area use to be fairly liberal until the teabag revolt. Since then has been red.
Assuming you abode in a rural hamlet of limited size, do you think it is appropriate for you to self-righteously judge large cities? BTW, you have no proof that BLM activists are rioters, looters, or arsonists. (O rthugs for that matter.) So why do you play around in such unreasonable associations?
In gooses defense I would think that would entirely depend on IF he has lived In both the rural and urban setting in his life time , I know I have, 20 years in boston and its suburbs and took advantage of all the cultural educational and entertainment qualities offered to a hometown boy , been to ALL the major US cities , as well as a number in Europe and in the middle east. I think that is a pretty well rounded basis for making any judgement call that would affect myself
I think it would be safe to say that if the same is true for him , and he lives in a predominantly rural area , he had already such as myself made a judgement on urban life and the quality of it for ones self .
We can all like rural life better when we our constitution is suited to it, generally speaking, city people like hamlets and the wilderness in their aging years. However, the young want something (generally) more upbeat and exhilarating. So what's to criticize*? Wildfires largely occur in the countryside (beautiful and pristine as it is). They do their work (damages) and then new growth and rebuilding start all over again-sometimes without the former human occupants.
The grass is not always greener on the other side. Cities do not all fail, burn, or suffer cyclic catastrophes. Certainly cities don't burn with the exception of people lighting fires to protest a greater grievance of not being heard by their officials!
* Your statement on city life is ambiguous and leaves much to the imagination. Care to be more explicit?
what would you like explained or expanded ? I was young , and as you said young people tend to want more upbeat things , so yes I while in boston experienced as much of the different cultures , cuisine and party atmosphere as I could I also took advantage of all the different libraries from the multitude of institutions of higher learning as well as the public assets in things that had caught my interest , usually it was history, both local and national with a smattering of world history . I always found adults or people close to my own age but not quite peers to have discussions with , they seemed amused and amazed someone my age took such an interest in things .
I got to see the world curtesy of Uncle Sugar and the military , at minimal cost to myself , and had enough time off to be able to travel you can go a long ways in 3 days off in a row , and Europe isn't all that big really , at least not the parts I could go to in the 80s.
I went suburb when I started having kids , and later went rural as both myself and they got older , method behind the madness was they too would want the upbeat and exciting and leave home of their own free will .
I can say every major city in the world I have been to , has had both its good and bad , every singe one has had its own multicultural experience that it was alright to explore , but I have already chosen how and where I choose to live , The entire point is , if you choose to live somewhere , you take care of it , and not let others in fits of anger or disparity make it worse . destruction brings no worthwhile changes.
Is that explained well enough?
You explain yourself well. Thank you. Black people in cities may not have those privileges you enjoy to relocate, the openness and especially safety (positivity) you expect when you move into the 'outdoors,' and may possess limited control over their living (rental) environments in cities.
And yes, some of that is by social engineering design (for and against people of color). For instance, people can "sweep around their own doorsteps" and hold to high-minded standard of community, but. What good is any 'standard' or standards when outside forces won't let you live in them in peace. That is, outside influencers, policy-makers, and "authorities" keep razing or unending any and all sense of community? (By killing elements of the citizenry haphazardly, demoralizingly, and with bare-boned justifications.)
Its not a privilige , its the reward for a lifetime of work and making choices along the way that fostered the ability to do as I set out to all those years ago , anything worthwhile takes a great deal of work and perserverence , and the willingness not to give up or in .
priviliged? yeah I was priviliged to have to work towards what I have achieved , even with a modest inheritance( < $100,000 ) that was parlayed over 40 years into a high 7 figure savings/ retirement asset, I still had to work for what I got .just as everyone else does .
You think its safe here? average response time for any public service such as police , fire , or amb, is 20-30 mins.
Add into the fact that the criminal element also know all this as well and think they can buffalo their way through any situations . so arson ( most likely) assault , or a med emergency , one has to be up to snuff and ready to deal with whatever is thrown at them.
Im not the one that brought up race and it has nothing to do with race , so I think you can guess where people who base things on race can go with that when it comes to me.
people who bring up race to me generally are showing me they are in fact racists , and I do not converse or associate with those sorts by choice., nor do I help them. life gives them what life thinks they deserve , let them curse life .
Ghettos, projects, police shootings and violence, poverty, manipulated setbacks, limited access to bank loans, limited participation in business enterprises, redlining, gentrification, systematic break up of families through "programs," etceteras. . . . Minorities are not "banging" themselves. And, minorities are hard workers too. There are systems in place to see that they indefinitely remain "hard workers" and little more than "hard-workers" limited in generational wealth. Minorities are priced out in the system!
Mark, do not condense or diminish the inequalities of our society down to individual strengths and weaknesses. There will always be a percentage of exceptions or exceptional people who defy any one group of rules!
I, we, should be discussing what is wrong with our society, structurally, that repeatedly is dropping people through its prosperity floorboards to bottom out.
Race? You ask? Why are white police officers being repeatedly videoed shooting and otherwise taking the lives of black boys and black men? It deserves greater investigation and understanding. It is not normal! It is not enough to say the youth and older men do not follow "instructions." Other boys and men are not any better at following authority "commands" and are alive, healthy, and prospering as I write this.
Thus, the cities are on fire, because the 'answers' and ideas returning from authorities are UNSAT! People act out in the streets because what they have is great frustrations and they can not contain it after a time. The explanations are weak and wanting.
It is not enough to simply say to outraged and confused families, friends, and communities, 'Go ye and be well!' After so many unexplained lives have been excised helter-skelter. Of course, these murders are occuring in cities and communities of color. Question for you is this:
What would you feel/want answers to/do about it if authorities in your rural community began haphazardly killing friends, relatives, and otherwise community associates?
*Unless you have studied the issue of police shooting of minority youth and adult males to its conclusion, you have no reason or ability to rule out implicit, explicit, or systemic racism.
Okay. I will review your evidence material. Please, present it now. I want clear cases, not suppositions and 'yahoos' mouthing empty phrases.
Well, you certainly got images and videos of people carrying on. I grant you that. Just so you know, I have contacted via email on the web, BLM, asking for some official statement as to to their protest policies. I will let you know what I hear back. Granted people can blow things out of proportions when they protest, protest strongly, or protest violently. A solution is to hear the UNHEARD rather than just to 'clock' (document) their anger and rage!
That being said. You 'delivered' from you POV. Thank you. I will take what I saw in your links under advisement. One caveat: Not the RT.com link however. I am dubious about them most of all.
NY has a rail, tar and feathers for The Trump Parade.
He better stay in Florida...
He's started a cold war with China already, so why not a domestic one as well? During my whole life of 83 years I've never seen America in such a sorry situation - it's hard for anyone to believe.
China started the Cold War. Trump is simply defending our country from aggression.
By increasing taxes on American businesses (tariffs)???
On exploiting America Chinese businesses. Their country then devalued their currency to pay the tariffs.
Do you honestly believe that China is paying tariff taxes? Really?
And here I thought that term only applied to Russia.
China is our largest trade partner and the tariffs only hurt US businesses.
Donald has his trademark ties made in China. Also, Ivanka has a number of Chinese trademarks. Would you like to withdraw the question, now?
I rather employ Americans to make it. How practical that is only your economist knows for sure! FYI. Last week as I crossed a twin set of toll bridges, none of the stalls were manned. Just a note above on the 'trons': No Cash. Check Your Mail For Billing.
Two major bridges. Now then, when the virus positively ends, what practical chances, assuming this test of the machines running the toll process is a success with with few glitches, are there those prior toll employees will be reinstalled to their jobs?
Trump is absolutely right. The destruction that occurred, and continues to occur is something that could have been stopped/minimized. Liberal leadership allowed this happen, let them fix it or live in the hell they created.
So should Blue States stop paying to fund Red States that have mismanaged their States since Red States are more dependent on the federal government?
I'll still pay my taxes so that some poor red State family can eat tonight. [ deleted ]
“So should Blue States stop paying to fund Red States that have mismanaged their States since Red States are more dependent on the federal government?“
Blues states carry red states is a popular liberal talking point that is not entirely true. Every state with a balance of payment ratio of less than one pays more to the federal government through taxes than they receive. States with a ratio higher than one pay less than they receive.
There are blue states with a ratio higher than one. There are red states with a ratio lower than one. In other words, those red states are carrying blue states with a ratio higher than one.
income is also more of a factor than political policies. Typically, red states (think southern states) have a lower pay rate for the same job than other states. The more people make, the more they pay. Like it or not, that is how our system works. So of course many red states will lag behind simply because income is not on par with other parts of the country.
another factor that throws a monkey wrench into the “political policy” theory liberals like to use is welfare programs. Recipients must earn below a certain threshold to get these benefits, which skews the ratio even further. Which states will receive more welfare benefits, lower income or higher income states?
Sadly, it’s not as easy as just saying “blue states bail out red states” because there are many variables that come into play. If one wants to look at blue states vs red states One can also look at the fiscal health of each state. This is where blue states lag and some will, at some point, need a bailout to deal with unfunded pensions, two come quickly to mind, california and illinois
“I'll still pay my taxes so that some poor red State family can eat tonight. You're welcome.“
You have never met me, you don’t know me, [deleted]
Of the states that 'carry' other states, ONLY 2 red states get less than they send, Nebraska and Utah, who combined total less than a billion.
JUST the first 5 states with the most disparity in the amount the send in vs what they receive combine for over 68 BILLION. Hell Minnesota comes damn close to loosing as much and Nebraska and Utah combined.
There are other variables too. There are red states who will have to be 'bailed out' to deal with the fact that they've polluted their fresh water supply, two quickly come to mind, Texas and Oklahoma.
While claiming workers earn less in red States than blue states is a convenient cop-out as to why they pay less in taxes and receive more in benefits, in general the fact remains, Blue States are far more likely to pay into the federal government more than their citizens get back in benefits or entitlements. Red States, who as you have said earn less and pay less in taxes, are the most vocal voices proclaiming they pay too much in taxes and have the erroneous belief that they pay more than blue States as they continue to falsely claim the blue States just want "free stuff". If red States are so against "free stuff" you would think they might refuse the entitlements and thus be the States and party of fiscal conservatism. Instead we find they are more likely to benefit from at least one entitlement than their liberal counterparts and the last 6 conservative Republican Presidents have increased deficit spending and increased the debt far more than their Democrat counterparts. These are simple facts that those in the Red States seem to want to sweep under the carpet and constantly lie about.
"when the lens shifts to political ideology, the survey finds virtually no difference in the share of conservatives (57%), liberals (53%) or political moderates (53%) who have been assisted by at least one entitlement program ."
Perhaps if conservatives started being honest about their own apparent lust for entitlements and stopped lying about liberals and progressives we could actually come together for entitlement reform.
The red states are the takers, get it right gazoo.
At least we fixed the system where red state federal tax payers are no longer subsidizing the effects of high state and local taxes in blue states like we used to.
Just an FYI? Without the economy of California, 8 red states would starve to death. Most blue states are financially stable, most red states are broke and they soak up the majority of welfare dollars from the feds. Been that way for a long time.
oh, ffs.
which snakeoil salesman saw you coming and sold you on that BS?
just another instance of someone knowing something that isn't true
Pretty much!
Gee, I must be missing where your link cites the political Party affiliation of welfare recipients. Can you block quote that part for me?
Just another instance of someone posting a link that doesn't support their comment.
[deleted]
You're right. Without California, no red states would starve because more blue states would have to step up to support them.
Blue California would stave if red California didn’t feed it
inane and untrue. but you know that, right?
Are YOU are too fucking obtuse to acknowledge that my comment is about MUVA's LINK?
It's just the opposite.
The central valley of CA is BLUE Xx. Your beloved Shasta County's economy is less than 3% Agriculture. The large red counties in eastern California are arid and/or mountainous. Just stop.
then make your fucking comments to HIM.
now, if you are honest, doesnt that make more sense to you?
You made your comment about Frost's post to MUVA. Why shouldn't I make my comment about MUVA's link to you?
you want to look foolish, I damn sure ain't going to stop you!
History says you're wrong. But you know that, right?
oh the irony
I would ask you to prove it, but since we both know you can't, why bother, eh?
And I HAVE asked you to prove your claims before, but you have always refused, made excuses, or ran away from the comment thread.
Remember, you made the initial claim, which means the burden of proof is on YOU. But you know that, right?
I have to assume trump is talking about cities that have elected democrat city officials in place, that sat back and allowed rioting and looting to go on all the while holding back their LEO personnel.
I actually think telling people to think about if its time to leave a place because the local , city or state authorities can not or refuse to provide even minimal police or or any other public service such as fire or EMT , is not a bad idea. and that is a choice the individual people will have to make .
Now if he is talking about federal moneys to rebuild what was destroyed and looted ,I would have to say that is up to the local , city and state governments and not the feds to figure out how to do that since it was their direct choices that allowed the destruction and looting to take place in the first place ..
and if the feds wont fork over funds , imagine how hard it will be to convince the investor , large or small to invest in an area that has suffered riots and looting , without police protection. Detroit is a good example .
True the big problem is many times over the last sixty year they have taken money from the federal taxpayers and Michigan taxpayers and funneled it into Detroit with no good results. It's still a violent dump that went bankrupt and all that money that was taken from the taxpayer and given to Detroit was wasted. I can't tell you how many times over the years the media and politicians have claimed Detroit was going to recover and it never did. We have a plant in Detroit and it requires armed guards 24/7.
We have a cold civil war. We know where liberals and conservatives and left and right and Democrats and Republicans (Trumplicans) stand, but where do the moderates and independents stand? You either have to be against this pestilence of TRUMPISM, or for it, there is no middle ground in this.
Trumps not responsible for the rot and stench of so many Democrat led cities
“Leave Democrat cities,” wrote Straka. “Let them rot."
And go where, pray tell us?
"The Dude" is so damn stupid that he does not comprehend that inviting "the rot" to his so-called "pristine" party will corrupt the whole red bunch. Now that I think about it: Yeah, liberals go take-over red towns, valleys, and plains. Give them what they 'crave.'
Can't. They don't feel safe unless they congregate in large numbers, like in the cities they now populate and run, sometimes into the ground.
What the author was saying is to let them fester in the problems of their own damn making. Fix it yourselves, you made the mess, time to clean it up.
Oh! So now you have promoted up to a rank of "author-whisperer"? Well Texan, liberals live in Texas and in national suburbs-indeed. Liberals range freely That blows your "congregate" characterization into the ground! Moreover, even it was true that liberals group together. What does that say about some conservatives who exist in a dwindling population?
Furthermore, cities would run themselves a lot better if ever some conservatives would keep their self-righteous (not a good thing) 'noses' out of being part of the problem—not partial to the solution.
WTF are you prattling on about now?
Well, no shit.
Perhaps we can all just pretend that some of the most liberal cities in Texas are not Austin, Houston, El Paso, and Dallas.
Nope, sorry, I can't just pretend the truth isn't the truth.
Okay, tell us all what conservatives have done to fuck up the cities of Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle, and Portland. I am just positive THIS time you can actually back your claim up.
GO!
First off, watch how you speak to me. As for self-righteous conservatism, you will simply have to study up on what you do not know about black (and other groups) poverty which impedes power and influence. It is not my responsibility to 'school' you beyond a basic discussion. Moreover, what liberal problems exist in those cities can be worked out without some conservative exaggerated inputs!
And since we are near to the subject, it has not escaped me that you like to pull your 'pat' distractions out of your back pocket and lead farther away from that daily talking ass of a leader some conservatives can't defend on a daily basis. It is a new day, and of course, 'talking presidential ass' is out on the lawn and in Minnesota wiping himself on liberals! Imitation is a form of flattery eh, Texan?
Doesn't matter anyways.
just another in a long line of unsupported drivel.
Kiss off.
My, my, my.
Imagine that! You avoiding my questions!
See--ONE WAY WITH YOU.
Be gone now!
Congratulations on another sterling effort to deflect to Trump!
Well done!
I guess when you ain't got nothing else, stick to what you know best, eh?
Distraction, deflection, bamboozling.
I've shared my piece. You can continue on without mentioning Trump of course if you must! Bye!
As always.
Yes, I can. Some simply can't get their emotions in check long enough to discuss anything without losing it over Trump.
Buh bye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dismissed!
The Republicans have done nothing to cause this mess...the Democrats appear to be doing it all by themselves, with a little help from Antifa and BLM thugs.
Right.
Democrats control those cities and some have been under Democratic control for decades. To even suggest that conservatives are somehow preventing those Democratic hellholes from improving themselves is astounding.
hell if the Democrats CAN fix it (which one poster CLAIMED), why the hell HAVEN'T they already?
Why do you keep posting that damned link that doesn't work?
That’s the far left we are talking about!
Donald Trump is not a conservative (ask a true conservative) and from the retweet (above) demonstrates he has poor impulse control!
"... chronic use of prescription opioid drugs was correlated with support for the Republican candidate in the 2016 US presidential election."
"... counties and states with the highest opioid use were often areas carried by the Republican candidate... "
We know where the real hellholes are.
Thank Christ I didn't use those opioids prescribed for me when I broke my ankle...not a lot of them anyway
Used to get severe back aches. Ouchie-crunchies! But when given a prescription with some opioid type pills I was willing and able to rebuke it in the name of Jesus! I do not want that stuff in my system as long as I don't have to have it!
agreed...
let people have what they voted for....
vote for democrats and your city goes to shit.... simple enough.
Great, so all those farmers and ranchers in red states should be stuck with the consequences of voting for Trump and the tariffs that fucked them. No more BILLIONS in bailouts.
im thinking there is a big difference between states following the law and states letting their cities burn on purpose.
but yanno... just my opinion
why should other states pay to fix that which the left burns and destroys?
but the good news is... watching the exodus of taxpayers out of cali and ny is priceless
they aint coming back any time soon.
brilliant... lol
so your mixing federal and state govt? LOL why am I not surprised? (rhetorical)
let's try this. regardless if red or blue...
states should not be bailed out if their problems are a direct result of that state's political policy,
states should only get federal money for natural disasters and such... not political disasters.
( if states go broke due to their political policy - they will go into receivership and learn the word "austerity )
WTF does that have to do with how they vote? Hint: NOTHING.
No surprise that you linked ANOTHER article that you obviously didn't READ. NYC residents moving out to their NY country homes or buying new property in the Hamptons isn't an 'exodus of taxpayers out' of the state.
FAIL!
BTFW, since the California link is from YESTERDAY and the bill hasn't passed yet I'll presume that it hasn't caused anyone to leave.
So we are not going to be on the hook for bailing out that bastion of fiscal conservatism formerly known as Kansas? Yea right, everyone in the US is going to be paying taxes to fix that fuc up.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/people-are...
https://www.ocregister.com/2019/10/31/190122-more...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brendarichardson/2020/...
https://strangesounds.org/2019/11/california...
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/13/leaving-new-york...
Did you miss the 'red state' part 8?
Interesting.
So when a state and local political policy exacerbates the effect of a 'natural disaster', we shouldn't give them any federal money to rebuild that shit.
Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Florida keep rebuilding in flood plains and fail to mitigate the issue, 'disaster' after 'disaster'. No more money for them.
Wow, 5 links.
3 don't work.
1 is about Yosemite Valley flooding. Perhaps you can scrap up some relevance for that.
And 1, behold, actually talks about out-migration, which started while Arnold was Governor and continued throughout the drought. It doesn't go into the REASONS for said out-migration much and gives not evidence for what it does say.
One would think that if voting in Democrats caused all of this, it would have started long ago. Hell the Bay Area has been a Democratic enclave for over half a century but it's population is STILL growing. LA County has been Democratic since the mid 80's and it's still growing too.
I can't, and would even if I could, understand things for you.
I am sure you can learn to use Google or another search engine all by yourself somehow.
If not, who gives a shit?
Oh, FFS,
Look, I know how hard this must be for you to take.
I'll make it easy for you:
1st link:
2nd link:
3rd link:
4th link:
5th link:
I hope this illuminates things for you, but like I said, I can't understand it for you.
Well, good, maybe some of those wealthy Californians and New Yorkers...who tend to be a bit more liberal than the average red stater....will move themselves into my deep red state and city.
Sure would be nice to see something besides trmp signs all over the place
I really couldn't care less that your fucking links didn't work Tex.
Post them properly next time.
Do you deny that this is where the first link you posted from strangesounds leads?
Besides you, who cares where it leads?
Are you disputing still that people are not leaving California and New York in larger numbers than most states?
And I don't care if my links worked for you the first time or not. I reposted them, so read them or not, but for God's sake, stop whining about it. Sue me.
And I never denied anything, so don't try to pull that crap on me.
Take your strawman elsewhere. I won't tolerate it.
Since you reposted them, I'd presume YOU do.
Actually, I never disputed that Tex. Assume much?
Your the one whining Tex.
I ASKED you a question. Seriously, read more carefully.
Please get a dictionary...
Well, this is boring the living hell out of me.
I told you I won't tolerate it.
Adios.
Don't let the green grass fool ya! It is easy to compete! Companies move and shuffle headquarters back and forth on a dime!
Only in 'America' do we have the time to sit around measuring each other's . . . 'sticks.' What a waste of time. We need bigger, harder, and maybe even, you guessed it. . . longer problems to deal with!
No problem if they move out. We could use a little less traffic.
Point, set, and match to Dulay.
Of course, everyone else was playing chess. Leave it to a liberal to not even know which game is being played, and then brag about it!
LMAO!
I play a mean game of chess too Tex.
All I can say is FUCK YOU TRUMP!
Limited vocabulary?
$20 says she had help with that little bit.
Trump has basically given the middle finger to any of his supporters who live in blue cities or states.
That tweet should be blown up and used in the DNC convention, along with some of his greatest hits. Also, I would love for them to play Trump's Best Words video.
Too late! Most of them already have!
If politician wanted a city to rot, what would they do differently than de blasio or lightfoot?
Deflection...
Next time around (i.e. November 3) maybe Americans will elect a POTUS who will be a president of and for ALL Americans, not just those he likes.
[deleted]
LOL. I really don't give a shit what you do, and I'm sure I neither need nor want any opinion of yours.
If this shameful bs does not convince the EC that Trump should be voted out, then nothing will.