Trump's Public Confession

  
By:  al Jizzerror  •  7 months ago  •  145 comments


Trump's Public Confession
asking for help from foreign governments is illegal

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election - Ellen Weintraub (The head of the Federal Election Commission)

Opposition research, or as Trump calls it "oppo research" is valuable .  The democrats paid a U.S. firm to obtain a copy of the "Steele dossier". 


FEC chairwoman appears to subtweet Trump over the illegality of accepting foreign help in election


Savannah Behrmann , USA TODAY

WASHINGTON— The head of the Federal Election Commission reminded candidates that asking for help from foreign governments is illegal in an apparent subtweet of President Donald Trump 

Ellen Weintraub's tweet came after  Trump exclaimed that China should investigate former vice president Joe Biden , despite already being in the middle of an impeachment inquiry after asking Ukraine for the same thing.

"By the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the Biden's because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine," Trump told reporters on the White House South Lawn Thursday.

 “Is this thing on?” Ellen Weintraub wrote soon after Trump's press gaggle, re-upping her original scathing memorandum from June , accompanied with the microphone emoji.

800

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/10/03/fec-chairwoman-subtweets-trump-over-accepting-foreign-help-election/3855546002/

Okay, that's the law.

Here is one of several public confessions Trump has made.

You just saw (and heard) Trump confess.  

You are now a witness.

Are you willing to testify against The Donald?

I am!



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
al Jizzerror
1  author  al Jizzerror    7 months ago

LOCK HIM UP!

 
 
 
cobaltblue
1.1  cobaltblue  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    7 months ago

Here is the Traitor-In-Chief asking for China to investigate the Bidens . "If they don't do what we want, we have great power."

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
1.1.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @1.1    7 months ago
Here is the Traitor-In-Chief asking for China to investigate the Bidens .

Yep.

That's another article of impeachment.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  cobaltblue @1.1    7 months ago

After the tariffs he imposed on China, what makes him think they would do anything to help him.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.3  Dulay  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.1.2    7 months ago
After the tariffs he imposed on China, what makes him think they would do anything to help him.

As the code states, the 'solicitation' is enough, the 'receipt' isn't necessary. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  cobaltblue @1.1    7 months ago

"China  should start an investigation..........................can you pick out the operative word? Didn't hear him ask.............anyone.jrSmiley_30_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_50_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.5  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @1.1.3    7 months ago

Gotta link for that "code" because "Foreign National" doesn't fit the description of a country - which China is.

Foreign National - A foreign national is any person who is not a national of the country in which they are residing or temporarily sojourning. For example, a foreign national in Canada is someone who is neither a Canadian citizen nor a permanent resident.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–155, §303(2), added subsec. (a) and struck out former subsec. (a) which read as follows: "It shall be unlawful for a foreign national directly or through any other person to make any contribution of money or other thing of value, or to promise expressly or impliedly to make any such contribution, in connection with an election to any political office or in connection with any primary election, convention, or caucus held to select candidates for any political office; or for any person to solicit, accept, or receive any such contribution from a foreign national."

New section (a)

It shall be unlawful for—

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—

     (A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

     (B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

     (C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
1.1.6  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.5    7 months ago
Gotta link for that "code"????

https://thenewstalkers.com/trout-giggles/group_discuss/7179/trumps-public-confession

It's in this article.

Maybe you should read it before posting ignorant comments.

800

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.7  Dulay  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.1.6    7 months ago

Yep, right there on the bottom of Ellen Weintraub's statement. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.8  1stwarrior  replied to  al Jizzerror @1.1.6    7 months ago

Since you didn't understand it, obviously it wasn't so ignorant.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
1.1.9  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.8    7 months ago

800

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.10  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.5    7 months ago
Foreign National - A foreign national is any person who is not a national of the country in which they are residing or temporarily sojourning. For example, a foreign national in Canada is someone who is neither a Canadian citizen nor a permanent resident.

That's hilarious 1st. 

Instead of relying on the definition in the US Code, you post a definition from Wikipedia. Without posting a citation for it BTFW. 

If you're going to try to argue that LAW with me, you better bring FACTS and a lunch. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.11  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @1.1.10    7 months ago

Dulay - you don't know WTF you're talking about.  Regardless of where it comes from, THAT is the definition of who a Foreign National is.

Believe me - I'll never argue the "law" with you - too low to go.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
1.1.12  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.5    7 months ago
Gotta link for that "code" because "Foreign National" doesn't fit the description of a country - which China is. Foreign National - A foreign national is any person who is not a national of the country in which they are residing or temporarily sojourning. For example, a foreign national in Canada is someone who is neither a Canadian citizen nor a permanent resident.

Once again, read the fucking article.  This is right there in the article:

FEC Chairwoman Appears To Subtweet Trump Over The Illegality Of Accepting Foreign Help In Election

Savannah Behrmann , USA TODAY

WASHINGTON— The head of the Federal Election Commission reminded candidates that asking for help from foreign governments is illegal in an apparent subtweet of President Donald Trump 

Let me repeat that:

The head of the Federal Election Commission reminded candidates that asking for help from foreign governments is illegal
 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.13  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.11    7 months ago
Dulay - you don't know WTF you're talking about. Regardless of where it comes from, THAT is the definition of who a Foreign National is.

Well at least I  know how to read a fucking LAW.

From 52 USC 30121

(b)“Foreign national” defined As used in this section, the term “foreign national” means— (1)a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22

That means that you have to go to 22 USC 611(b). There you will find: 

(b)The term “foreign principal” includes— (1)a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party;
Believe me - I'll never argue the "law" with you - too low to go.

You chased me all over the fucking seed making snarky comments and demanding that I spoon feed you information that is already right in the seed. I don't know if it's laziness or obtuseness that caused you to post those comments instead of carefully reading the law that was right in front of your face. 

Now you want to pretend that I don't know what I'm talking about. Well make a fucking argument because your proclamation goes NOWHERE with me. 

I note that you haven't even tried to defend Trump against the allegation that he violated 52 USC 30121. Your whole argument is that it doesn't apply. Well Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub and I say that it does, prove us wrong. Or is supporting your own fucking bullshit 'too low to go'? 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
1.1.14  cobaltblue  replied to  Dulay @1.1.10    7 months ago
That's hilarious 1st. 

Omigawd! How did I miss this?? I'm laughin' so darned hard!!!!! You're so right on, Dulay. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
1.2  Split Personality  replied to  al Jizzerror @1    7 months ago

This morning Mick Mulvaney is wondering how many other meetings he was not invited to.

He found out about the Baghdadi raid after the fact.  He is officially the White House's new "invisible man".

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mulvaney-was-left-in-the-dark-on-al-baghdadi-operation/ar-AAJzePR?ocid=spartanntp

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
1.2.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Split Personality @1.2    7 months ago
Mick Mulvaney

Here's Mickey being honest.

800

 
 
 
MUVA
2  MUVA    7 months ago

no 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
2.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  MUVA @2    7 months ago

Be careful, you can be considered an accessory (after the fact).

 
 
 
cobaltblue
2.1.1  cobaltblue  replied to  al Jizzerror @2.1    7 months ago
considered an accessory

Like a pearl necklace~!

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    7 months ago

Are you willing to testify against The Donald?

Count me in!  Time's a-wastin'! 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1  Raven Wing  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @3    7 months ago
Count me in!  Time's a-wastin'! 

Count me in too! jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1    7 months ago

I'm in!

 
 
 
Ronin2
4  Ronin2    7 months ago

The protect Joe Biden at all costs campaign continues.

 
 
 
MrFrost
4.1  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @4    7 months ago

There is still ZERO evidence either Biden did anything illegal in the Ukraine. None. Only the words of a chronic liar. So yea they should be protected. 

Donny says lots of things, 85% of it is lies and made up conspiracy theories.

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  MrFrost @4.1    7 months ago
There is still ZERO evidence either Biden did anything illegal in the Ukraine.

Durham and Barr aren't finished yet. jrSmiley_46_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.2  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @4.1.1    7 months ago
Durham and Barr aren't finished yet. 

Thanks for admitting that there is a perfectly LEGAL venue for investigations of Trump's conspiracy theory and that therefore Trump's Ukraine/China asks were unforced violations of the law. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.1.3  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @4.1.2    7 months ago
Thanks for admitting that there is a perfectly LEGAL venue for investigations of Trump's conspiracy theory and that therefore Trump's Ukraine/China asks were unforced violations of the law. 

Ya....that's what I meant to say ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

Are you for REAL ? 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.1.4  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @4.1.2    7 months ago

What LAWS did he violate with China and the Ukraine?????

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.5  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @4.1.3    7 months ago
Ya....that's what I meant to say !

The world is full of unintended consequences. 

Are you for REAL ? 

Yep. 

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.6  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.4    7 months ago

READ the seed for that information 1st. It's ALL right there. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.1.7  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @4.1.6    7 months ago

Ahhh - can't handle the heat of actually DISCUSSING something, eh?  Got it.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.1.8  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Dulay @4.1.6    7 months ago
READ the seed for that information 1st. It's ALL right there.

This article (which conservatives can't comprehend) lays out the case that Trump has publicly confessed to violating FEC laws.

It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election - Ellen Weintraub (The head of the Federal Election Commission)
 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.9  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.7    7 months ago
Ahhh - can't handle the heat of actually DISCUSSING something, eh?  Got it.

You asked a question. I answered it. That WAS discussing something. 

What is it you want 1st? Do you want me to hold your hand through the content of the seed TOO? 

I suppose it's too much to ask that some people practice a little 'adulting' for themselves. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.1.10  1stwarrior  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.8    7 months ago

Read 1.1.5 - rrreeeaaaalllll slow.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
4.1.11  1stwarrior  replied to  Dulay @4.1.9    7 months ago

OK Duly - enough of the smart azz answers which are not answers.

My question TO YOU is simply - What LAWS did he violate with China and the Ukraine?  You haven't published/responded with any, so, please quit sidestepping.

Neither China nor Ukraine are "FOREIGN NATIONALS" - as such, the code listed is not applicable.

So, what, exactly, are the laws he violated?

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.12  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.11    7 months ago
OK Duly - enough of the smart azz answers which are not answers.

My question TO YOU is simply - What LAWS did he violate with China and the Ukraine?  You haven't published/responded with any, so, please quit sidestepping.

Neither China nor Ukraine are "FOREIGN NATIONALS" - as such, the code listed is not applicable.

So, what, exactly, are the laws he violated?

WTF is your major malfunction 1st? How many times do you have to be told the READ the fucking seed. The content of the law is at the very beginning and the number of the law is cited at the bottom of Ellen Weintraub's statement. 

Do you want me to look up the Code and spoon feed the fucking thing to you one sentence at a time. Sheesh.

All you have to do is copy the wording of the law from the seed and paste it into your search engine. Or scribble the code # down and type it into google. 

Oh and Zelensky is most definitely a foreign national. 

Get over yourself, and do some adulting 1st.

BTFW, it's DULAY. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.1.13  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.11    7 months ago
exactly, are the laws he violated?
It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election - Ellen Weintraub (The head of the Federal Election Commission)

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.14  Dulay  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.11    7 months ago

It helps if you know how to read a fucking LAW.

(b)“Foreign national” defined As used in this section, the term “foreign national” means— 
(1)a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22

That means that you have to go to 22 USC 611(b). There you will find: 

(b)The term “foreign principal” includes— 
(1)a government of a foreign country and a foreign political party;

So now that I have held your hand through the process, do you know what law he broke? 

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.15  Dulay  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.13    7 months ago

I guess some are so used to swilling pabulum that when solid food is put on the table they just can't manage to digest it. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.1.16  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Dulay @4.1.15    7 months ago

It would help if they would just read the fucking article they are disputing.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.1.17  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Dulay @4.1.15    7 months ago

I love it they demand to know what "laws are violated".

They are admitting that they didn't even look at the fucking article.

The first sentence of this article is:

It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election - Ellen Weintraub (The head of the Federal Election Commission)

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.18  Dulay  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.17    7 months ago

I KNOW!

It's as if they think that if they actually READ some facts, the cognitive dissonance will overwhelm them and their whole world will collapse. 

Yet NOT knowing the facts doesn't keep them from proclaiming that there isn't any proof of Trump's Impeachable conduct. 

The RW petulance of just saying 'nu uh' is getting old. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.19  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @4.1.12    7 months ago

He keeps mocking member names like Mr. Frosts' and yours - if that was me, I would have gotten tickets every time  

 
 
 
KDMichigan
4.1.20  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.19    7 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
devangelical
4.1.21  devangelical  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.17    7 months ago

most of those in the current executive branch and their supporters are too fucking stupid to know what the Hatch Act is as well

 
 
 
devangelical
4.1.22  devangelical  replied to  KDMichigan @4.1.20    7 months ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.23  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @4.1.22    7 months ago

[Removed]

 
 
 
devangelical
4.1.24  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @4.1.22    7 months ago

 
 
 
cobaltblue
4.2  cobaltblue  replied to  Ronin2 @4    7 months ago
protect Joe Biden

And you protect a crook and traitor at all costs. There's no honor in protecting a known liar, cheat, thief, wannabe incest dad, and juvenile name caller. What's he hiding if he's so innocent? What's he afraid of? His kid may be looked at prosecutors down the line. His children are not as pure as the driven snow. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.3  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  Ronin2 @4    7 months ago
The protect Joe Biden at all costs campaign continues.

800

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.3.1  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.3    7 months ago

I see an "On-Going" "Pattern" here ! jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif  

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.3.2  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.3    7 months ago

384

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.3.3  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @4.3.2    7 months ago

800

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.3.4  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.3.3    7 months ago

Please don't stay "Stupid" ! jrSmiley_98_smiley_image.gif

384

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.3.5  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @4.3.4    7 months ago

How about ridiculous?

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.3.6  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.3.5    7 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
4.3.7  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.3.5    7 months ago

No one has more respect for women than me...

Oh yeah?  Well no one wants to kick your balls so hard they fly out of your ears more than me.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
4.3.8  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @4.3.6    7 months ago

 
 
 
It Is ME
4.3.9  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.3.8    7 months ago

jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
cobaltblue
4.3.10  cobaltblue  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.3.7    7 months ago
kick your balls

That's assuming too much already. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
6  cobaltblue    7 months ago

trump-is-rumpis-trump-is-aliar-a-fraud-a

 
 
 
It Is ME
7  It Is ME    7 months ago

"It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election"

It's a good thing Joe "Sleepy" Biden wasn't running for office when he got his kid a really, really "Lucrative" Job ! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
7.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @7    7 months ago
It's a good thing Joe "Sleepy" Biden wasn't running for office when he got his kid a really, really "Lucrative" Job !

800

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.1    7 months ago

Love " Go To's ", when "ONE" has NOTHING ELSE  ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

Was Joey a " Private Citizen " when he "DID THE DEED" ?

When "Running for Office"....there is "NO PRIVATE " ! jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
7.1.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @7.1.1    7 months ago
Was Joey a " Private Citizen " when he "DID THE DEED" ?

800

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.1.3  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.1.2    7 months ago

Having a SIMPLE "Pattern" isn't "Flattering" ! jrSmiley_89_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
7.1.4  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @7.1.3    7 months ago
Having a SIMPLE "Pattern" isn't "Flattering" !

You're so right (wing).

800

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.1.5  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.1.4    7 months ago

jrSmiley_76_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
7.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  It Is ME @7    7 months ago

As opposed to Trump putting his daughter and son-in-law in high positions of which neither were qualified to hold?

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.3.1  It Is ME  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @7.3    7 months ago
As opposed to Trump putting his daughter and son-in-law in high positions of which neither were qualified to hold?

Do they get a "Salary" ?

His "Daughter" should just "STFU" about "women" and "Rights" in business....huh.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
7.3.2  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @7.3.1    7 months ago
Do they get a "Salary" ?

They donate their salaries to their favorite charity - the pornstar hush money fund.

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.3.3  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @7.3.2    7 months ago
the pornstar hush money fund.

Cute is just that ….."Cute" ! jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
7.3.4  Dulay  replied to  It Is ME @7.3.1    7 months ago
His "Daughter"

Why the scare quotes? Do you doubt her paternity? 

should just "STFU" about "women" and "Rights" in business....huh.

Were those 'thoughts' expressed on her private email or her WH email? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.3.5  It Is ME  replied to  Dulay @7.3.4    7 months ago
Why the scare quotes? Do you doubt her paternity? 

Your Desperation is showing again ! jrSmiley_40_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
cobaltblue
7.3.6  cobaltblue  replied to  Dulay @7.3.4    7 months ago
Do you doubt her paternity? 

I think Trump doubts Barron's paternity. Because, remember, "Melania has a son ... together ... that she loves very much." 

 
 
 
r.t..b...
7.4  r.t..b...  replied to  It Is ME @7    7 months ago
Joe "Sleepy" Biden

Come up with that all on your own? Parrot away as necessary, but doing so is skirting the incestuous.

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.4.1  It Is ME  replied to  r.t..b... @7.4    7 months ago
Come up with that all on your own? Parrot away as necessary, but doing so is skirting the incestuous.

David Alexrod agrees with me ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
7.5  MrFrost  replied to  It Is ME @7    7 months ago

It's a good thing Joe "Sleepy" Biden wasn't running for office when he got his kid a really, really "Lucrative" Job !

So you are saying trumps kids who make a LOT of money in foreign countries, right now, today, should be thrown in prison? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
7.5.1  It Is ME  replied to  MrFrost @7.5    7 months ago
So you are saying trumps kids who make a LOT of money in foreign countries, right now, today, should be thrown in prison? 

Is that what I said ? jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
bbl-1
8  bbl-1    7 months ago

"Trump's public confession."  ? ?

Uh, "When you're a star you can do anything," comment by the DJT pretty much covers it.

The Trump will be an entertainer to the very end.  His destiny is the same destiny as the late Lenny Bruce.  MAGA rallies filled with yawning red hats that can't remember why they are there.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
8.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bbl-1 @8    7 months ago

Lenny OD'd on drugs.  Trump will do it with Big Macs.

 
 
 
bbl-1
8.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @8.1    7 months ago

I was referring to Bruce's stage performances in the end.  Spending his time railing about his court proceedings on obscenity charges.  Trump will also do 'the big whine' about being victimized.  Reread my last sentence. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
8.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bbl-1 @8.1.1    7 months ago

Apologies.

 
 
 
bbl-1
8.1.3  bbl-1  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @8.1.2    7 months ago

Although your 'Big Mac' comment does have authenticity.

The apologies would be mine.

 
 
 
lady in black
9  lady in black    7 months ago

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTGg9WdfMs_jNTyuhHB5kg

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ8GvA6f7herjMeloWbjMR

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSsLD0lmlRPl1bPoPGZyHE

image.jpeg.45b165755b5d7f6cfe2669f4b1464

 
 
 
cobaltblue
10  cobaltblue    7 months ago
SAN FRANCISCO — The crowd of people waiting to get into the Apple Store in Union Square on a Tuesday in February 2017 included tourists, shoppers, techies — and Rudy Giuliani, the newly appointed cybersecurity adviser to President Trump.

Giuliani showed up at the San Francisco store after being locked out of his iPhone, just 26 days after Trump named him cybersecurity advisor,   NBC News reported Thursday, citing interviews with two sources and an internal Apple Store memo.

The former New York mayor had entered his passcode incorrectly 10 times and went to the store for help — a troubling move that suggests a sloppy approach to cybersecurity for someone so close to the president, experts said.

“There’s no way he should be going to a commercial location to ask for that assistance,” E.J. Hilbert, a former FBI cybercrime agent, told NBC, saying that Giuliani could be vulnerable to hackers and should have turned to White House technical officials for help.

* * * *

As for his 2017 appearance in San Francisco, a former Apple employee who was at the store when Giuliani sought help told NBC that the former presidential contender was waiting outside the store’s glassy facade when it opened at 10 a.m. that morning. A tech helped Giuliani erase and reboot his phone

While black t-shirt-clad employees at the San Francisco store said Thursday they couldn’t talk to a reporter or hadn’t heard about the Giuliani news, shoppers and tourists had a laugh over Giuliani’s iPhone woes.

“That’s not a shock to anyone who’s ever heard him speak on TV,” said Mike McKinley, who carried two white Apple bags with laptops for his New York hospitality business out of the store. “He almost seems senile at this point. It’d be sad if it wasn’t so disturbing.”

Mike Sparkuhl, a surgeon from Southern California who was browsing for a new iPhone before a lunch meeting, chuckled when he heard the news.

“It speaks to how the people the president chooses play fast and loose when it comes to security,” he said. “Whether you’re talking about (Giuliani’s iPhone), or about what they did in Syria.”

Cite

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
10.1  author  al Jizzerror  replied to  cobaltblue @10    7 months ago
Giuliani showed up at the San Francisco store after being locked out of his iPhone, just 26 days after Trump named him cybersecurity advisor, NBC News reported Thursday, citing interviews with two sources and an internal Apple Store memo.

WTF?

Giuliani was named cybersecurity advisor?

And he can't even use a fucking iPhone?

That's like naming a foreign agent National Security Advisor.

Oh yeah.  Trump did that too.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online





33 visitors