╌>

Biden's, Left's Promises of Unity Are Empty and Meaningless

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  6 years ago  •  288 comments

By:   Tom Borelli

Biden's, Left's Promises of Unity Are Empty and Meaningless
Democrats and fellow anti-Trump activists are engaged in a full scale war seeking to punish President Trump’s supporters personally and professionally. Such intimidation tactics mimic communist states and banana republics which tells us a lot about today’s Democrats and their supporters.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

The Biden call for unity is nothing more than a sick joke from a deranged senile old man.   The real call is for vengeance and retribution.  They want to run a scorched earth campaign against Trump, his administration, supporters, and voters.  It’s unAmerican.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



GetFile.aspx?guid=e89ef5b5-9c5c-4db5-b73f-d1e780840792&SiteName=Newsmax&maxsidesize=600

Judging by the outrageous call for retaliation against supporters of President Trump, Joe Biden’s call for unity was an empty and meaningless gesture.

Soon after the election results, Joe Biden issued a statement of unity declaring, "It ’ s time to put away the harsh rhetoric, lower the temperature, see each other again, listen to each other again."

Since Biden’s call, actions and statements by Democrats and anti-Trump activists following the election shows quite the opposite; unity is out and turning up the temperature on the political opposition is in.

The truth is Democrats are waging a full scale war against President Trump’s supporters by pushing a wide range of retaliatory measures targeting backers of the president.

The most outrageous strategy is being waged by Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., who is urging U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to not seat the 126 Republican House members that backed the Texas Supreme Court lawsuit on election fraud.

In a series of Tweets, Pascrell justified his action by citing the 14th Amendment and claimed the Republican House members are "traitors" as well as "engaging in rebellion" by attempting to change the election results and put into power "Donald Trump an unelected dictator."

A day before Pascrell’s effort, Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.,  slammed the GOP House members that signed an amicus brief supporting the Texas lawsuit claiming they are "trying to overturn the results of our election" and "attempting a coup in broad daylight," respectively.

The Democrat intimidation effort is not restricted to elected officials but goes much broader to include those who worked or defended the president in court.

In a remarkable display of intimidation, law firms representing President Trump over the election results were targeted by activists who threatened to apply pressure to the law firms other clients.

According to Politico , three law firms withdrew from representing President Trump over threats linked to activists including The Lincoln Project —  an organization backed by those who could be seen as being in the pro-Biden and anti-Trump camp.

The Lincoln Project engaged in Democratic-type activism by using Twitter to encourage people to challenge the law firms and to personally challenge the lawyers helping the president on their LinkedIn accounts.

The blacklisting type of activism waged by The Lincoln Project was even too much for Twitter when the organization broke the social media company’s rules on abusive behavior when it provided the email addresses and phone numbers of two attorneys.

As a result, Twitter temporarily locked The Lincoln Project’s account.

Detroit is also trying to retaliate against Attorney Sidney Powell for challenging the election results.

Law and Crime reports the city asked a federal judge to punish Powell and her team with fines and to block them from practicing law in Michigan’s Eastern District.

Last, but certainly not least, is the blacklisting of people who supported or worked in the Trump administration.

In a Tweet, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez urged people to archive "Trump sycophants" because she feared President Trump’s supporters would try to distance themselves from the president in the future. After her Tweet she pushed back against critics saying they feared ". . . the idea of being responsible for their behavior over the past four years."

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was essentially asking for the creation of an enemies list that can be used to punish individuals in the future.

Going further, Hari Suvugan —  former press secretary for the Democratic National Committee and former presidential campaign manager for Pete Buttigieg — promoted the Trump Accountability Project that sought to list the names of members of the Trump administration on the website.

Preventing future employment of members of the Trump administration is the goal of the Trump Accountability Project. Defending the effort, Suvugan said , he backs "… the idea of preserving the record and ensuring the officials who actively damaged American democracy aren ’ t able to profit from that experience."

After significant pushback, the Trump Accountability Project’s website was inactivated on the basis it conflicted with Biden’s call for unity.

Democrats and fellow anti-Trump activists are engaged in a full scale war seeking to punish President Trump’s supporters personally and professionally.

Such intimidation tactics mimic communist states and banana republics which tells us a lot about today’s Democrats and their supporters.

 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2  MrFrost    6 years ago

Trump is the most divisive president in history, but lets claim how divisive Biden is before he even takes office. Trump said that 200 million Americans are the enemy of the USA and the media is the enemy of the people.. That's divisiveness taken to the next level. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1  Tacos!  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago
but lets claim how divisive Biden is before he even takes office

I don't think the story is doing that. It credits Biden with calling for unity but attacks certain others for being divisive.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  cjcold  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.2    6 years ago

Biden is well known for reaching across the aisle and seeking bipartisanship.

These insane rants do nothing but make you look foolish.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago
That's divisiveness taken to the next level.

Of course it is, and this seed itself that is claiming Democrats are the dividers is doing exactly what it faults their opponents for. We have to just accept it, division is here to stay because the majority of Americans rejected this new brand of 'Banana Republican' created by Trump and the undemocratic religious conservatives and white supremacists who support him. All these Banana Republican losers have left is to whine and lie and throw tantrums and the majority of Americans are sick of it which is why Biden received over 7 million more votes than his sore loser opponent. The Banana Republicans have done nothing deserving of any sort of compassion or civility, they have earned every bit of the actions that are being taken against them for their attempt to trash democracy and lie about a legitimate election they lost by a landslide.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
2.2.1  Gazoo  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.2    6 years ago

Gee, your post isn’t divisive at all 🤪. It’s not only divisive, it’s hate filled trash.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Gazoo @2.2.1    6 years ago
Gee, your post isn’t divisive at all

The blatant double standard most conservatives have as they call progressives and Democrats every name in the book, many falsely claiming Democrats are involved in child trafficking or even eating babies and claim they are an evil that needs to be cleansed from America then get their panties in a bunch when they get called out for for it has gotten old. I'm done playing their stupid games. They deserve no civility as they have never shown any themselves. Not only have they not been calling for unity, they are slapping away the hand offered in a good faith gesture of unity offered by Biden and many on the left. The only 'unity' Banana Republicans offer is absolute submission to their will which they will never get. I've lost any patience I had left when I saw most of them refuse to accept the results of an election and instead scream about widespread voter fraud they cannot and have not been able to prove because it didn't happen. They decided there was fraud simply because THEY LOST and they don't like it. It's pointless to continue to even try to debate or cooperate with them, they have proven themselves traitors to the constitution and to true American values.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.2.5  CB  replied to  Gazoo @2.2.1    6 years ago

Cut to the conclusion: Are Trump supporters really wanting to end this national experiment of unity? Be firm and clear in your reply. Less/no doubletalk!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.2.6  CB  replied to    6 years ago

See @2.2.5 .

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.2.7  CB  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.2.3    6 years ago

BRAVO! Standing Applause.

These 'folks' apologize for no -thing they do. No matter the need; no courtesy. Then, gripe and complain (as if I should give a damn).

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.2.9  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.8    6 years ago

Yet after 2 days, the post still stands without being flagged or moderated by the YOU, the seeder. 

So it looks like instead of addressing the content of the post, you and yours prefer to dis and deflect. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2.2.10  Krishna  replied to    6 years ago
It is easy a sweeping generalization with  vile and bile thrown in for good measure.

It isn't hard an actual facts?

with  vile and bile thrown in for good measure.

Is is easy that you're a poet and you don't know it!

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
2.2.12  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.11    6 years ago

Massively delusional:  jrSmiley_115_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3  MrFrost    6 years ago

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
4  CB    6 years ago

UnChristian rhetoric is unfair and a low-standard to Christianity. Shame on those who do it. Christianity maintains a high bar, nevertheless! These people's failings to live up to what is truthful is on their heads-not Christianity.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5  Split Personality    6 years ago

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits  one or more  of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the  deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence.

Although rated questionable they are not yet rated "off the rail" to prevent publishing here.

right051.png?resize=600%2C67&ssl=1

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Split Personality @5    6 years ago

Newsmax is a questionable source? You don't say !  It is also known as Trump's favorite news source these days. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1.1  CB  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    6 years ago

What this means is "Trump 2024" plans to give us the 'business" for a long as s/he can. Only a fool would elect a combative spirit like Donald Trump to lead this nation (and world by extension). Donald Trump is a one-trick 'pony.' Tired and over-rated.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.2    6 years ago

Why do you just make shit up?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.1.4  Gsquared  replied to  Split Personality @5.1.3    6 years ago

Delusional.  Can't accept reality.   

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1.6  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.5    6 years ago

But is this okay, if you answer to a Higher Authority? I suggest y'all stop mocking that which profess to be. Appearances are figuratively killing y'all confession. Jesus has given some conservatives the same reality as everybody else! You won't be able to survive in one of Donald's making. Jesus is not a pathological liar or envious of another man, woman, or child.

If there is any of that in your dealings with Trump; you are in the wrong 'house.'  And you can't search two contrasting masters. For you will love the one and hate the other. Get it?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.1.7  cjcold  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.5    6 years ago

Since Trump is the most prolific liar ever to occupy the oval office and since I have been reading your seeds and posts for ten years or so, seems a good fit for you.

When Trump runs again in 2024 maybe Palin should be his VP pick.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.1.8  Krishna  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.2    6 years ago
after they didn’t bend the knee and bow prostrate on the ground before “President elect Biden.

Its easy that what you just said is yet just another case of "FAKE NEWS"!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.1.9  Krishna  replied to  Split Personality @5.1.3    6 years ago
Why do you just make shit up?

The answer should be obvious (But if anyone posts it they may get banned...)

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1.13  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.10    6 years ago

In our belief system. Jesus is not a pathological liar or envious of another man, woman, or child. In fact, the scriptures tell us we should tell the truth as much as it lies within us.

Are you living up to that regarding all of our present leaders?  

Does lying everyday conflict with the Law of Truth (In Spirit) - MAGA?

How do you know when Donald is telling the truth-MAGA?

Answer, please.

I can strive hard to, in your words, "respect our leaders obey" when said leader demonstrates a propensity to tell the truth.

It does require that leader to maintain a proper measure of coherence, consistency, and validity.

Donald is fractured in his orders, policies, and he exceeds in ordering people to run to and fro on pointless ventures.

So, I ask you:

For those reasons: When and how am I to know when to trust Donald—to obey his orders?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1.14  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.11    6 years ago

Trump would be a disgrace. The man has mismanaged a four year president and MAGA it speaks volumes that some conservatives adore a loser. Trump is a failed president who is shaming the office of president, embarrassing his family lineage, and it is being reported that Donald literally asked (is begging?) a subordinate  VP to prostrate himself on the presidential timeline by not doing his official duties as President of the Senate according to the Constitution of the United States.

And you want that 'thing' to head the 2024 Republican presidential ticket. Have some conservatives no shame left?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.3  Ronin2  replied to  Split Personality @5    6 years ago

Really, so would you care to refute what the article says? Should be easy since it is a questionable source. Please point out to everyone one false statement the article makes.

Seems to have several facts that are easily checked and verified. Unlike left wing media it list actual names, and what they said or did. No unidentified sources making outlandish claims that cannot be easily verified. 

 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.2  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @5.3    6 years ago

Fake news.  Taking a handful of true statements and applying it to 80 million people without proof.

But I can see why that would not offend you because you do it all the time.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.3  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.1    6 years ago

You never ask enough of yourself or Christ for that matter...

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.3.4  Ronin2  replied to  Split Personality @5.3.2    6 years ago

Right, so you can't refute anything. Every single quoted comment taken completely in context. Unlike the "unidentified sources" from the leftist media. Which they use endlessly, and continuously regurgitate and cite on each others' articles, to give them the air of being real. I don't see you calling them out. Trust me it gets very tiring.

I can see why you deny reality. Trying to claim that those quoted don't represent the feelings of a good portion of those that voted for Biden; including several members of this web site.

After the last 5 years of bullshit from the Democrats, their sycophants in the media, and their lemming followers- you still can't seem to understand why some on the right will never trust them. Especially when they espouse the bullshit quoted accurately in the article.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3.5  CB  replied to  Ronin2 @5.3.4    6 years ago
you still can't seem to understand why some on the right will never trust them.

Trust is a two-way street, Ronin2. I thought you knew. Just sayin. If a trump supporter thinks that s/he can metaphorically spread a liberal's cheeks open wide and figuratively thrust what 'facts' s/he thinks to be holding inside those cheeks, well, disappointment will be a constant friend!

Liberals will test everything critically or in accordance with a faith doctrine. So, tell the truth and trust me when I say that facts are facts for everybody and not just a select few.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.6  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @5.3.4    6 years ago
Right, so you can't refute anything. Every single quoted comment taken completely in context.

Again a handful of truthful statements about Pascrell or AOC does not mean it applies to more people than them, let alone all liberals or or Dems or any other label.

Unlike the "unidentified sources" from the leftist media.

Did you watch Hannity last night?  the lead story was from 2 unnamed sources in the WH

Which they use endlessly, and continuously regurgitate and cite on each others' articles, to give them the air of being real.

That happens on the right fringe every day.

Ask any frequent conservative seeder, it must drive him crazy trying to find a good source for a good fake news bound

to make liberals heads explode when Breitbart is quoting Geller who is quoting AT who is quoting Daily Stormer who is

quoting Breitbart.

I don't see you calling them out.

You should pay more attention.

Trust me it gets very tiring.

Then exercise, take vitamins and get more rest and sunshine.  Sunshine is very important.

After the last 5 years of bullshit from the Democrats, their sycophants in the media, and their lemming followers- you still can't seem to understand why some on the right will never trust them.

After more years of one sided BS from you than i care to count,

I don't worry at all about what you will ever understand or who you will ever trust.

Happy Holidaze.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3.7  CB  replied to  Split Personality @5.3.6    6 years ago
Then exercise, take vitamins and get more rest and sunshine.  Sunshine is very important.

Goodness! I need to take that rest and sunshine advice for myself! I simply can't get the recommended daily amount of either! jrSmiley_124_smiley_image.gif

—Dazed and confused.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.8  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @5.3.4    6 years ago
Unlike the "unidentified sources" from the leftist media.

Both sides do it and both sides howl in pain & outrage when they are the target.

The more pain & outrage, the closer to the truth it is.

In the same episode, famed Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein, who worked with Bob Woodward to break many of the Watergate stories, told Stelter, “Almost all 200 of our stories about Watergate were based on anonymous sourcing.”

And, he said, it’s critical to use anonymous sources when reporting on this White House.

“Reporting is almost uniformly based on anonymous sourcing in part because that’s the only way we can get to the truth,” Bernstein said.

First, let’s be clear about this: News organizations would prefer for sources to go on the record. They don’t like using anonymous sources but often have no other choice. Sources don’t want to be named out of fear of retribution — either from those they are talking about or from the general public.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.3.12  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.9    6 years ago

Physician, heal thyself.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.3.13  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.10    6 years ago
We have nothing but contempt for the lamestream media

Too many of the so-called "conservative" news and opinion sites are lying and deceitful.  

Take heed to the lesson from John 8:32.  The truth will set you free.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.14  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.9    6 years ago

Ironic coming from you.........

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.15  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.10    6 years ago
Your lack of preference for our conservatives News and opinion sites mean less that nothing to us conservatives. 

Sure it does.

It galls you.

It makes your blood boil to the point that you race to deny what is true when it is staring you in the face.

It makes you think about making seemingly clever comments to those that disagree with you.

We have nothing but contempt for the lamestream media liberals prefer.

Good, waste your time on earth hating inanimate objects and people you will never meet or know.

Then think about what good things could have been done with that time.

jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.3.19  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.16    6 years ago

Self delusion seems to be a trait of many Trumpists.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.3.20  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.11    6 years ago
Poynter is funded by George Soros and his Open Society Forum.

Poynter is funded by many organizations including

Funders

Andrew W. Mellon Foundation

Annie E. Casey Foundation

Charles Koch Foundation

Democracy Fund

Environmental Defense Fund

Facebook

Foundation to Promote Open Society

Google News Initiative

John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

Lumina Foundation

MacArthur Foundation

McClatchy Foundation

Miami Foundation

National Endowment for Democracy

Newmark Philanthropies

Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust

Omidyar Network | Luminate

Open Society Foundations

Peter & Carmen Lucia Buck Foundation

Rita Allen Foundation

Robert R. McCormick Foundation

Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Tides Foundation (Google.org)

Yet they take money from the Kochs and the Beckers too, why do you think that is?

 Anathema to conservatives along with all IFCN groups they fund.  

They should only be an anathema to the deliberately ignorant and uninformed.

MBFC is affiliated with Poynter. 

More BS. Another baseless accusation?  Link? 

Never mind, here is what MBFC said about Poynter & IFCN.

Our inbox has been overflowing with anger toward Poynter Institute for publishing a list of alleged fake news sources . We have been asked to rate them Questionable or Mixed for factual reporting due to this one publication. We will do neither. Poynter met our criteria by removing the article and then following it up with an explanation of their mistake and a dedicated effort to get it right. That is responsible journalism and how it should be done. Mistakes happen and we make them too and correct them.

From our ratings and perspective, most of the sources on their list were accurately portrayed, however, Poynter did not provide evidence to support their claims, which is what we do on this website. We are not sure why they would not want to use our evidence based Questionable list, but instead chose OpenSources, which does not provide any evidence to support their designation of bias, conspiracy, fake news, etc. Since Poynter controls the signatories of the International Fact Checking Network it is concerning that they would publish this list without ample evidence to back the designations of UnNews. Poynter did the right thing by removing the article and explaining the error. Hence, we will not change their rating of High factual reporting.

...

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes).  The reporting is factual and usually sourced.  These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased sources.

  • Overall, we rate Poynter Institute Least Biased based on low emotional reporting and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

SMH

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.3.21  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.18    6 years ago
A national break up would be preferable

We Americans plan on keeping our country intact.  Trump cultists really should consider living in Russia, a country that shares their values and beliefs.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3.22  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.16    6 years ago

Untrue. You will not be successful in telling anybody, anywhere, that Jesus had alternative messaging (Spin!) and not a definite message in and for this world. The Truth will set some conservatives free! God has not shackled you to Donald Trump 'for life.' And his presidency is nary at its end. #Walkaway.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3.23  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.18    6 years ago

So you want your own country on this soil? That's pathetic. Not only do I hope y'all do not get it within my life-time; I wish you never get it. If this nation must 'experiment,' must ying-yang its way through all time - then I say let it! Otherwise, come back to the middle - all of youse extremists!

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.3.24  Thomas  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.18    6 years ago
The fact is that I would choose to not communicate or dialogue with people who are on your side of the aisle at all rather than let them set the terms for the communication.

That statement begs the question, Why Are You Here?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.3.25  Krishna  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.1    6 years ago
Should be easy since it is a questionable source.

Nope.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.3.26  Krishna  replied to  Split Personality @5.3.3    6 years ago
You never ask enough of yourself or Christ for that matter...

Indeed!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.3.33  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.31    6 years ago

Let's be real clear. If you must create a reality, out of whole cloth, just so you can disengage from liberals, this nation will fail to sustain its stature in the world.

Right now, we are zig-zagging and careening like a country out of touch down the corridors of time. How much longer over time do we have before other nations see us as the 'world drunk' to be stigmatized and whispered about when its back is turned?

Russia and China are already meeting to join forces against 'the world's drunk' that is fallen and can barely set in the saddle!

Remember the lesson of the Tower of Babbel from the Old Testament prophets! While you dally in the foolishness of anger, outrage, confusion, and slowing the pace of this nation - the smart money will be put into less confused nations—

The one's that appear to be fighting to get there COLLECTIVE SHIT TOGETHER.

BOTTOMLINE:  We are each other's strength and reason for being at this point!

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
5.3.34  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.30    6 years ago

Trumpist values and beliefs predominate in Russia.  Instead of living in isolation from mainstream America, Trump cultists should consider living out their remaining days in Russia, where they will feel welcome.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.3.35  Thomas  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.3.32    6 years ago

I am here for enjoyment.

I sometimes agree with people and sometimes don't.

Sometimes I just lurk and read.

I sometimes get angry at the way that provable, factual information can be ignored or mixed with nonsensical conjecture and pseudoscience to slant peoples opinions in one way or another for the benefit of a few people whose sole aim is control of others. I sometimes speak stridently to those who's posts or seeds are full of the same. 

Mostly, I try to remain somewhat calm and offer my analysis of seeds that I disagree with while pointing out logical and factual inconsistencies.   

And Sometimes, I just give up when it appears that I am yelling into the Void.

There. I answered your question. Would you kindly return the favor?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6  CB    6 years ago
Such intimidation tactics mimic communist states and banana republics which tells us a lot about today’s Democrats and their supporters.

Browbeating liberals. Really? Wonder why you think that will work?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
8  Split Personality    6 years ago

I would also like to point out that the author has a Phd. in microbiology, but spent most of his life in investments and politics.

He still insists on being addressed as Doctor.

Imagine that...

/s

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
8.2  Krishna  replied to  Split Personality @8    6 years ago

Micro?

Probably because he has such a tiny brain...?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
8.3  Krishna  replied to  Split Personality @8    6 years ago

And this is interesting:

During his 25 years with the Altria Group, Inc., he built a foundation in public policy and issues management, drawing from diverse experiences ranging from basic research to corporate affairs

Golly gee-- I wonder what he was doing for the Altria Group?

Anyone familiar with the Altria Group? (And more importantly, their history?)

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
8.3.1  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @8.3    6 years ago

Anyone familiar with  the Altria Group?  (And more importantly,   their history?)

What's that?

How many years?

How many billion?

Golly gee-- I wonder what he was doing for the Altria Group?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
8.3.2  Split Personality  replied to  Krishna @8.3    6 years ago

Insisted and testified as to the safety of nicotine in cigarettes

Kind of destroys PHD Borelli's credibility.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
8.3.4  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @8.3.3    6 years ago

Google and duckduckgo are your friends.

Borelli was not just an unapologetic supporter of smokers "rights" he was the architect of smear campaigns against anyone who did not stand with Big Tobacco. 

Basically shunned by scientists after the first Big Tobacco settlements, he and another nut case took their millions earned from Phillip Morris and started an investment firm????

Now he is at a conservative think tank as a coal expert???

He is an antiscience scientist, one of the father of the anti climate change movement.

It's not as if this is a secret, Borelli brags about it...

Dr. Tom Borelli Ph.D. had a doctorate in biochemistry from the New York Medical College in Valhalla, New York. He is one of the best-known of the science corrupters who worked for the tobacco industry, mainly because of his roles with what became the 'Science Issues' division of Philip Morris which was, for many years, at the center of industry attempts to delay any legislation on passive smoking (ETS). One of his more notorious projects was to run a scam using the part-finished research of Luis Varela, a Yale PhD student who died unexpectedly in February 1990. This became known as the Varela Study project.

Before working for Philip Morris, Borelli was a technical specialist for the Products Safety and External Technical Affairs Division of General Foods World Wide [Note: General Foods was bought by Philip Morris.] . He also worked as a science consultant for the Committee on Science, Space and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives. (DOCS 000033)

He became the manager of Philip Morris Corporate Scientific Affairs Department in January 1989. In this position he became one of the chief architects of most of the company's (and therefore the industry's) main operations which aimed to confuse not only smoking and health research, but also to discredit science in general -- in both general terms (ridiculing epidemiology, etc) and specific scientists and their findings. The tobacco archives have thousands of documents taken from Philip Morris files, which show how destructive these malicious projects were to anti-smoking activism and legislation -- and how, by widening out their attacks on science in general, they were able to form coalitions with other industries with poisoning and polluting problems (coal, nuclear energy, chemicals, freon, formaldehyde). The climate denial movement is a direct result of these coalitions. 

The signing of the Master Settlement Agreement between the States Attorneys General (followed by the Clinton Presidency) and the American tobacco companies led to the slow release of 14 million file documents. This subsequently exposed the corporate-driven Machaevellian activities of tobacco industry scientist as lobbyists and designers of scams to distort scientific fundings. Borelli transferred to work for Philip Morris Corporate Services, Inc. in Brussels (probably to get him out of reach of American lawyers). (PMI's Introduction to Privilege Log and Glossary of Names, Estate of Burl Butler v. PMI, et al, April 19, 1996)

Junk-science, funds-management business

Later Borelli joined forces with the industry's notorious junk-science promoter, Steve Milloy (of TASSC and Fox News) and they went into the funds management business. Milloy was one of the key science lobbyists in America who was vocal (and developed celebrity status) in dismissing the dangers of passive smoking and he ridiculed the idea of climate change. Borelli had run him as an undercover tobacco industry supporter during his many years with Philip Morris.

In November 2010, the records show that Tom Borelli was a managing partner with Action Fund Management , an investment advisory firm, and a portfolio manager for the Free Enterprise Action Fund . [1] He was also still listed as a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research in Washington, D.C. [2]

As of 2012 Borelli was working at the right-wing think tank FreedomWorks as a Senior Fellow and an "expert" on the coal industr

He's a real prince. /s

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
8.3.7  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @8.3.6    6 years ago

Seems like their purpose was to troll corporate America while padding their own pockets.

The Free Enterprise Action Fund is a mutual fund set up by Steven Milloy and Thomas J. Borelli . [1] Milloy is a climate skeptic and has been a Fox News commentator and a paid advocate for Phillip Morris , ExxonMobil and other corporations. He is the founder of JunkScience.com. Borelli was formerly a tobacco scientist at Phillip Morrisand is a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research. The Free Enterprise Action Fund aims to counter the trend by corporations to embrace corporate social responsibility and campaigns by activist groups seeking to shift corporate social and environmental policy.

...

During 2005, the Fund underperformed the S&P 500 index by more than 50%, while rewarding its managers with above-average management fees of 2%. 

According to a January 26, 2006 report in the Chicago Tribune , "The fund's advocacy stance boils down to opposing many of the things supported by traditional 'social investment funds,' because issues like global warming or corporate governance distract business from its real role of operating in the best interests of shareholders." However, its performance as an investment has been less than stellar .

The Tribune called it the "Stupid Investment of the Week ... Strip away the rhetoric, and you're getting a very expensive, underperforming index fund, while Milloy and partner Thomas Borelli get a platform for raising their pet issues. ... An expense ratio capped at 2 percent--ridiculously high for a portfolio of corporate giants--makes stock market returns unrealistic. From inception on March 1 of last year through Dec. 31, Free Enterprise Action returned 2.32 percent; the S&P 500 returned 4.72 percent. That's ugly." [3]

In 2006, the Independent noted that: "The fund has about $6m (£4m) under management at the moment but claims to be growing fast" and "is supported by a network of right-wing think-tanks including the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute

It's your hard earned money, waste it as you please.

Please note that the wiki page stops in 2006. The because it merged into the more legitimate Congressional Effect Fund

and ceased to be, so I would love to see where you think they were a Wells Fargo acquisition.

The Congressional Effect Fund miraculously lasted til 2013 before being shuttered.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
9  CB    6 years ago

More and more people are starting to notice just how bizarre Donald and his 'troupe' are behaving. Y'all should take stock that people are beginning to mock y'all publicly in the media, because you all are putting too much out there that is laughable.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
9.1  Krishna  replied to  CB @9    6 years ago
More and more people are starting to notice just how bizarre Donald and his 'troupe' are behaving.

I've noticed the same thing..

And BTW, many of those people are lifelong Republicans!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
9.2  Krishna  replied to  CB @9    6 years ago

double post removed by charger, no violation

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
9.3  Krishna  replied to  CB @9    6 years ago

Y'all should take stock that people are beginning to mock y'all publicly in the media,

Arguing with serious pro-Fascist types doesn't work. ( LINK)

Perhaps ironically, one of the most effective strategies against these types is Mockery!

(Why?)

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
9.3.2  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @9.3.1    6 years ago

Why lower your own credibility by slandering people you do not know with obvious falsehoods?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
9.3.4  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @9.3.3    6 years ago

Your constant repetitive imitation has been accurately described as the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness.  Most would consider it mindless.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
10  Paula Bartholomew    6 years ago

Pure banana oil.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11  Buzz of the Orient    6 years ago

Surely the lawyers bringing those totally unsupportable cases knew that they were wrong - didn't some lawyers even quit or refuse to do it?  In Canada, wasting the court's time by bringing legally unsupportable and trivial proceedings leads to such proceedings either being laughed out of the court, or the lawyers bringing such actions being blasted by the judiciary, with an example I know of being the judge ordering that the lawyer bringing such proceedings be required to pay not only all the court costs, but also all the fees that the opposing lawyer has charged their client, PERSONALLY.  I'm surprised they have not declared the lawyers bringing such legally unsupportable trivial proceedings to be in contempt of court yet.   

American lawyers are so lucky to be able to ambulance chase trivial cases such as a person SPILLING COFFEE ON THEMSELVES being able to successfully sue the restaurant (the famous McDonald's case).  I could have made so much more money in litigious maniacal America practising law than in Canada.  Shakespeare must have been foretelling the future about predatory American lawyers when he wrote in Henry VIII Part 2 "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."  I give credit to the American lawyers who either refused to bring Trump's lawsuits, or quit when they determined they were unsupportable or damaging to America, or in fact to any American lawyer who would refuse to bring such cases before the courts. 

Personally, I think the families of the Americans who died from Covid-19 should bring a MASSIVE class action lawsuit in each State using State law (so he cannot pardon himself) against Trump for being at least partially responsible for the deaths due to his ADMITTED DELAY in doing or saying anything that would have helped prevent those deaths.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11.1  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11    6 years ago
I think the families of the Americans who died from Covid-19 should bring a MASSIVE class action lawsuit in each State using State law (so he cannot pardon himself) against Trump for being at least partially responsible for the deaths

I am not sure those courts would have standing on a federal figure/matter/case.

Also, regarding Donald and this "ability" to pardon oneself out of any matter whatsoever no matter how severe as long as it is not impeachment:

Excuse me for wording this this way— Have the good people in this country lost there damn minds?

Do they realize that even mildly stumbling over this .  . .issue of pardon power. . . is to give complete power to do anything to a president of the United States! Now come on my fellow citizens, y'all know good and damn well that the founding fathers did not grant presidents "all power" to do anything that is in their hearts through an act of pardoning indirectly afterwards.

Come On Now!

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
11.2  Thomas  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11    6 years ago
trivial cases such as a person SPILLING COFFEE ON THEMSELVES being able to successfully sue the restaurant (the famous McDonald's case)

Buzz, to the case in point, McD's had served their coffee too hot for a long time prior to that law suite. ( Link )

Mrs. Liebeck was not driving when her coffee spilled, nor was the car she was in moving. She was the passenger in a car that was stopped in the parking lot of the McDonald’s where she bought the coffee. She had the cup between her knees while removing the lid to add cream and sugar when the cup tipped over and spilled the entire contents on her lap.

The coffee was not just “hot,” but dangerously hot. McDonald’s corporate policy was to serve it at a temperature that could cause serious burns in seconds. Mrs. Liebeck’s injuries were far from frivolous. She was wearing sweatpants that absorbed the coffee and kept it against her skin. She suffered third-degree burns (the most serious kind) and required skin grafts on her inner thighs and elsewhere.

Liebeck’s case was far from an isolated event. McDonald’s had received more than 700 previous reports of injury from its coffee, including reports of third-degree burns, and had paid settlements in some cases.

Now, more to your point, I, too, am glad that some of the lawyers in the US know when to fold. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.2.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Thomas @11.2    6 years ago

Well, okay, I admit my example was an exaggeration and I knew that McD was partially responsible.  We actually talked about that case in law school in Toronto.  However, you probably are aware of some uncanny results from law suits in the USA.

Unfortunately China has blocked this source but perhaps you can tell me if any of the cases recited could be considered frivolous.

15 Crazy Lawsuits That Prove Our Justice System Is Screwed

In 2005, Anna Ayala claimed she found a severed finger in her Wendy’s chili and the nation made a giant vomiting noise. As a result, Wendy’s lost millions in sales from patrons who had images of severed fingers dancing in their heads.

..
 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
11.2.2  Thomas  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11.2.1    6 years ago

There are some lawyers that are in it strictly to get large settlements for their clients, no matter the veracity of the suite, because that means more money for them.

Some of the cases in the link are indeed seemingly frivolous, but the McD's case is in there, so it is difficult to ascertain without going further into the cases.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.2.3  Gsquared  replied to  Thomas @11.2.2    6 years ago

The McDonald's case involved a significant injury resulting from corporate malfeasance.  It was seized upon by corporate interests as useful propaganda in a campaign to limit corporate responsibility.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
11.2.4  Thomas  replied to  Gsquared @11.2.3    6 years ago

see 11.2

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.2.6  Gsquared  replied to  Thomas @11.2.4    6 years ago

I'm very well aware of the McDonald's case.  I have instructed clients about it at times over the years.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
11.2.7  Thomas  replied to    6 years ago

I do, but not when it is 190 degrees. Read the link in 11.2.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
11.2.8  Krishna  replied to    6 years ago
Do you drink coffee it’s really hot

No I don't drink coffee its really hot.

But easy I make it correctly.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
11.2.9  Krishna  replied to    6 years ago
Do you drink coffee it’s really hot if you make it correctly.

No.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
11.2.10  Krishna  replied to    6 years ago
Do you drink coffee it’s really hot if you make it correctly.

You are easy incorrect!

You know the routine. You bring water to a boil, then brew your coffee. So many people brew coffee this way, because it’s quickest and easiest. But is that boiling water hurting your brew?

When brewing coffee, the sweet-spot for water temperature is around 202-206 degrees Fahrenheit.  Most of us do not have   a temperature-controlled electric kettle   at home, but water boils around 212 degrees Fahrenheit, so we rely on the telltale whistle of the kettle.

Since boiling water is a little too hot, pouring the boiling water directly onto the coffee grounds can cause them to extract too much too early, leaving a bitter taste in your cup. Violently bubbling water also agitates the grounds unnecessarily, which can lead to uneven extraction.

So next time you’re brewing at home, let that boiling water chill out (literally) for about 30 seconds. This will bring the temp down towards that sweet spot and help you get a gentler, tastier extraction. Happy brewing, coffee heads!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
11.2.11  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @11.2.10    6 years ago

Since boiling water is a little too hot, pouring the boiling water directly onto the coffee grounds can cause them to extract too much too early, leaving a bitter taste in your cup. 

So next time you’re brewing at home, let that boiling water chill out (literally) for about 30 seconds. This will bring the temp down towards that sweet spot and help you get a gentler, tastier extraction.

Incidentally, with some other brews, its an entirely different "Cup of Tea"!

Regular Black Tea should be brewed with very hot boing water. 

Moving from Black to Green to White-- lower temperatures are necessary.

And as I'm sure you are aware-- you don't have to even brew Matcha at all! (There's some evidence that Matcha may be the healthiest of all-- although White and Oolong have their advocates)

So (to paraphrase the infinitely wonderful Shepard Smith):

So now you know The News..!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.2.13  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.2.12    6 years ago

Good luck with that.  As soon as America's self-declared but acknowledged by many god and master realized it was a problem he DELAYED doing anything about it because he didn't want people to panic (Trump interview with Woodward), and had he dealt with it then and there in a professional manner (as countries that contained it did, like New zealand) everything would have been back to normal now.  

_v=63f541608951333

AND FOR EVERYTHING ELSE,

I BLAME CHINA

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11.2.14  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.2.12    6 years ago

And what is Donald Trump guilty of for downplaying the virus, holding maskless rallies, and ignoring the rising number of deaths from the virus?

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.2.15  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Krishna @11.2.10    6 years ago

No problem doing it right, I use a Phillips coffee maker, even use it to heat the water for tea.

philips-coffee-maker-01.jpg

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
11.3  Krishna  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11    6 years ago
Personally, I think the families of the Americans who died from Covid-19 should bring a MASSIVE class action lawsuit in each State using State law (so he cannot pardon himself) against Trump for being at least partially responsible for the deaths

Actually I've had the same idea for a while!

After Trump in no longer President, I wouldn't be surprised if there's a large Class-Action Lawsuit vs. Trump and his evil sycophants-- a "Wrongful Death" lawsuit.

(I may have the legal terms wrong but you get the idea!)

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.3.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Krishna @11.3    6 years ago

I'm not that familiar with American law, and although I'm aware that a presidential pardon can free a person of a criminal conviction, and even one anticipated, but can it protect a former president from a civil lawsuit, such as the class action we have been talking about?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.3.2  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11.3.1    6 years ago

A presidential pardon provides no protection from a civil lawsuit.

I have not researched the issue, but I think that the potential for bringing a class action lawsuit against the federal govrrnment is very unlikely.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.3.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Gsquared @11.3.2    6 years ago

IMO opinon Trump has the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent Americans on his hands - hard to believe he can walk away from that unscathed.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.3.5  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11.3.3    6 years ago
IMO opinon Trump has the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent Americans on his hands 

Indeed, he does. 

hard to believe he can walk away from that unscathed

He lost the election.  His reputation is in tatters.  History will record his dire malfeasance.  He will always be remembered as one of the worst Presidents, or very probably, the worst President America has ever had.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.3.6  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.3.4    6 years ago

It's no surprise that Trump's dedicated worshippers defend him and follow his methods, but his ADMITTED delay of taking meaningful steps to contain the virus when it FIRST occured in the USA, ignoring the guidelines and in fact trivializing them and holding maskless rallies and super-spreader events RATHER THAN what was done in China and New Zealand for examples of successful containment, has caused the huge proliferation of cases and deaths in the USA.  Deny deny deny all the Trump worshippers want, I really don't give a shit. Did they ever consider that maybe it was Americans who travelled all over the world who had a hand in spreading it world wide?  I'm sure they wouldn't even dream of that as a possibility, because whatever THEY do is the only right thing to do. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
11.3.7  Raven Wing   replied to  Gsquared @11.3.5    6 years ago

And if Trump really thinks he has a chance to win in 2024 he is really dreaming. It is unfeasible for him to think that he would be nominated or accepted as a candidate by the Republican party after the way he has treated them at this point, The Democrats would not have him, so what party would he run with in 2024? 

And there is unlikely enough of his radical supporters who would produce enough votes for him to win even if they created a party of their own. 

So Trump and his rabid supporters are simply pissing in the wind at his winning in 2024. And they know this, and are simply hitting their simple minded followers for money for them to spend on legal fees living a grand life while laughing at the gross stupidity of those who fall for their sick games.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
11.3.8  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Gsquared @11.3.5    6 years ago
"He lost the election."  

One of the very few presidential incumbants who ever did. 

"His reputation is in tatters."  

Not so sure it ever was particularly good.

"History will record his dire malfeasance.  He will always be remembered as one of the worst Presidents, or very probably, the worst President America has ever had." 

I'll say.  He might even one day rue the fact that ever was POTUS because of that (when he eventually, if ever, matures and can look back on his childish behaviour and incompetence). 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.3.9  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @11.3.8    6 years ago
His reputation is in tatters.
Not so sure it ever was particularly good.

You're right.  It wasn't.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11.3.10  CB  replied to  Gsquared @11.3.5    6 years ago

Remember Donald still has 'the chalk' - 'the pen' wielding in his hands. Time can record more foolish blundering around or some good for the citizenry that can attempt to mitigate. But only Donald can imagine what he will do with the power under his 'stewardship' yet.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
11.3.12  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.3.11    6 years ago

Send all your money, empty your piggy banks, empty your bank accounts, your 401k's, sell your coins, your car and your house. Send it all to the trump-2024 campaign. Hurry !!!

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
11.3.14  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.3.13    6 years ago

WHY NOT ?????? Don't you want to help your hero ??????

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11.3.16  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.3.11    6 years ago

That's indulgent. You're nowhere near being a prophet. And as for being a forecaster: Donald was supposed to win this time (without all the histronics)!

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.3.17  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @11.3.15    6 years ago
Not giving up my house or car or retirement or precious metals or rainy day fund

That's certainly not showing loyalty to your Dear Leader.  He should be able to expect much more from his devotees.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
11.3.18  Gsquared  replied to  Gsquared @11.3.17    6 years ago

Slight revision:  He should be able to extract much more from his devotees.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
12  Thomas    6 years ago

From the article:

Democrats and fellow anti-Trump activists are engaged in a full scale war seeking to punish President Trump’s supporters personally and professionally. Such intimidation tactics mimic communist states and banana republics which tells us a lot about today’s Democrats and their supporters.

Where to begin..... That is what Trump has been doing to everyone, Republican, Democrat, business associate, lawyer, who happens to be on the wrong side of the President at the particular moment. It is quite refreshing to see some Trump apologists see this but not recognize the irony of their statements, especially when, within the very same article, they are using the same tactics. To Wit: 

The Biden call for unity is nothing more than a sick joke from a deranged senile old man.   (Personal attack) The real call is for vengeance and retribution. ( Assignation of sinister motive .) They want to run a scorched earth campaign against Trump, his administration, supporters, and voters. ( Assignation of motive .) It’s unAmerican. (Personal attack)  

And

In a Tweet, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez urged people to archive "Trump sycophants" because she feared President Trump’s supporters would try to distance themselves from the president in the future. After her Tweet she pushed back against critics saying they feared ". . . the idea of being responsible for their behavior over the past four years." Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was essentially asking for the creation of an enemies list that can be used to punish individuals in the future. ( Personal and professional slur)

Or, just an accurate accounting of who said what and when. The accusation of the creation of an enemies list lives in the heads of the readers and writers of the article. And how could it be used to punish people if they had not done anything wrong? 

Going further, Hari Suvugan —  former press secretary for the Democratic National Committee and former presidential campaign manager for Pete Buttigieg — promoted the Trump Accountability Project that sought to list the names of members of the Trump administration on the website.

That is public information.  Sooooo, why would that be a big deal?  Are they afraid of something? What would they have to be afraid of? 

All of these are direct quotes from the article which do the very same thing as the author of the article purports is being done to the republicans and supporters of Trump. So, if he can attack falsely, why does he consider the Biden supporters attacks as bad? I mean, what is he afraid of? Being exposed as a fraud?

 

 

 
 

Who is online

Dismayed Patriot


99 visitors