Porn Star Says Trump Told Her "You Remind Me Of My Daughter"
Porn star Stormy Daniels says that she was not attracted to Donald Trump and more or less had sex with him on a whim.
Apparently to try and flatter her and woo her, he told her that her personality reminded him of his daughter, presumably Ivanka. Shortly afterwards they had sex.
He offered her a spot on Celebrity Apprentice and later had her spend time with him in a hotel bungalow trying to get her back in the sack, which she declined to do.
Trump failed to get the porn actress onto the prime time game show on NBC (what a shock!) and they never met again.
Daniels also says she was physically threatened on behalf of Donald Trump
"And a guy walked up on me and said to me, 'Leave Trump alone. Forget the story.' And then he leaned around and looked at my daughter and said, 'That's a beautiful little girl. It'd be a shame if something happened to her mom.' And then he was gone."
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Not a lot of new news in the 60 Minutes story, other than her saying she reminded trump of Ivanka.
"Were you physically attracted to him?"
"No, not at all. "
Trump lackey Chris Ruddy told ABC News this morning that Trump considers the Daniels allegations to be largely "a hoax".
I wonder if Stormy had her clothes on at the time.
According to Stormy she did at that time, it wasn't until later that night that she took them off, however, Trump was told by Stormy to drop his pants so she could spank him, that is what prompted Trump to comment about his daughter. Eewwww.
I wonder-- was Ivanka actually attracted to him? Did he have sex with her?
Come to think of it, the playboy model he had an "affair" with also said that Trump told her that she reminded him of his daughter. Maybe that was his go- to line to seal the deal.
Apparently before they first had sex Trump told McDougal that she was as hot as Ivanka. That's some pretty twisted stuff.
I just threw up in my mouth a little.
I would like to congratulate Donny and Ivanka on the birth of their child last year. I wonder if the kid will call donny dad or grandpa. I guess both.
Request moderator review
Look at the title of this article. Are you claiming that talking about Trump and Ivanka is not part of the subject matter? Or that you feel incest is not germane after he tells someone is if fucking that she reminds him of his daughter?
Then why did she climb into bed with him? Where was Anderson Cooper for that question?
Hoax or truth......it is disgusting.
I assume you blame Stormy.
Hey-- I've got a great idea-- Let's blame Hillary!
(Which of course makes no sense at all-- which is why it should appeal to Trump's hard-core supporters!)
Thanks to Bubba Billy Clinton, FDR, JFK, John Edwards, Gary Hart, Teddy Kennedy, and a host of other liberals and their supporters, no one cares about a politicians private sex life.
Yeah, we could see that in how many Teavangelicals voted for Trump. By the way, did you know that about 80% of Republicans still support Trump and, that 83% of Republicans are white? I wonder who his supporters are.
By the way....did you know that Trump WASN'T a politician when the "Storm" supposedly happened ?
The Liberal SEXUAL problems happened while THEY WERE ACTUALLY politicians.
Yeah, I did, however, did you know that an illegal in kind contribution was made to the Trump campaign by Mr. Cohen when he paid Stormy Daniels the 130k just days before the election? And, did you know that it is illegal to threaten someone with bodily harm in the United States?
He was found Guilty of a crime ?
Or are you just projecting the MSM, that hasn't been "correct" in anything, since Trump started running for president.
Who got threatened with bodily harm? I'll wait..................and while you're trying to dig your way out of that. It is a misdemeanor in most cases. You know, like liberals like to inject into the convesation when people enter the country illegally.
And there it is, the deflection, it didn't take long and is so predictable it's scary. But hey, i'll play. Since Bill was impeached for lying about getting his egg roll sucked on, I guess you no doubt agree that Donny should be impeached for paying Daniels off to keep quiet? Of course you do. No? Daniels had sex with donny in 2011....but it wasn't until 6 weeks before the election that she was paid off. Why the long wait? Why pay her off at all if it's, "just a hoax", as Donny claims? Why didn't he pay off all the other women that accused him? Weird huh? 6 weeks before the election...do you know what campaign finance fraud is? I can bet Donny does.
Oh yea... Newt Gingrich, Larry "wide stance" Craig, John Boehner, Bill Oriley, Roy Moore, Vance McCallister, Mark Souder..Etc. etc. etc... Since we are just name dropping here.
No, just like Hillary, he hasn't been found guilty of a crime. In his case though, you can add a "yet" to the end of the previous sentence.
I swear I NEVER posted anything about Hillary on this thread.
I could be wrong though.
"In his case though, you can add a "yet""
Can we add....YET.....to Hillary too ? Or isn't that a prudent thing when it comes to a "Liberal" crook ?
From what I've been reading, things are still moving along in that matter....when it comes to the investigation starting on the FBI that is.
Thous shalt not commit adultery. Ask Mike Pence, he says that "God's Law" is much more important than our secular laws. If true? Trump is fuked.
Stormy Daniels? Did you read the article or watch the interview?
NOW...your all for religion ?
They aren't my laws, they are Christianity's laws....Donny says he is a Christian... Correct? So they apply to him....
But, But, But.....Certain Religious Laws mean NOTHING.....right ?
No... You have had 20 years of investigations and you have yet to charge her with so much as a parking ticket. You lost, get over it, move on.
Oh.....
Was it an in-depth investigation....truly in-depth ?
FROM WHAT I've READ....AND I'M SURE YOU'VE READ THE SAME (although probably ignored by you)....NOW THAT THE FBI DEBACLE IS UP FRONT AND CENTER....HILLARY'S FUCKUP MAY COME TO AN ACTUAL END......Literally.
9 times? If you can't pin something on her after 9 fucking investigations you are left with two possibilities:
1) The republicans are idiots and REALLY suck at investigating ANYTHING..or,
2) There was no crime.
You pick.
But think of it this way, ok? This is the FIRST investigation into trump/russia. Even if nothing is found, we get 8 more tries.. I mean, fair is fair right? And we know the repubs won't object or complain because they had NO problems investigating BENGHAZI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 9 times.
Doesn't exist. Donny is discrediting the investigation because he is the subject of the investigation....DUH. He is literally playing the, "I know you are but what am I" game, and you are falling for it... LMFAO!!!!
you don't read much....huh.
I chooooooooose......"Cover up" for Liberal political reasons.
Ain't that a Hoot ? Bet you didn't know, or didn't care, that there was a 3rd option.
I read plenty, I just don't buy donny's BS.
And where does 90% of the black vote always go? You need 40% of the white vote to win so think before you charge racism.
A "Slut" is more believable ? Got it !
By the way......in case "Slut" bothered you......Hollywood is all up-in-arms over "Slutty" men "TAKING ADVANTAGE" of "Slutty" women that "slept around for movie bucks" !
I doubt they vote for the racist GOP.
They vote just as LBJ said they would!
"I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” .....Lyndon Baines Johnson
She also took a polygraph, which she passed. Don't like it? Hook donny up, wanna bet he WOULDN'T pass? Didn't think so.
Nobody claimed they were admissible except in your own imagination. That she passed one is just another point to her veracity over Trump's. All Trump has to do is take and pass one for himself to counter that point.
To me the thing that speaks loudest in her support is the fact that Trump and his attorneys tried to silence her both through a fraudulent contract and through the courts, and that they committed crimes in the process.......and also lied repeatedly about the contract and about whether Trump had ever met or knew Daniels.
Correct. But Stormy doesn't strike me as smart enough to beat it. We can debate their accuracy all we want, but you have to admit it definitely puts, "telling the truth" on her side.
Any number of things....the lack of Trump's (or David Dennison's) signature means the contract likely isn't binding on Daniels despite her receipt of funds. The hoops they jumped through to hide Trump's involvement are rather amusing too, as is the apparent use of the attorney's personal mortgage line of credit to pay Daniels given that he's not actually party to the contract. Trump's attorney also lied about the source of the funds. And that's before we get to the apparent violation of campaign finance law.
Not fraud, just invalid. A contract not signed by both people entering into the contract is just a worthless piece of paper. A contract has to have all concerned people getting their own copy with the signatures of all concerned parties or it is invalid and worthless. Unenforceable.
It means the contract is unenforceable and the legal threats Trump's attorney has made against Daniels are bogus.
.
Why wouldn't she? That's a free $130K with no strings attached since the money didn't come from the mysteriously orange David Dennison and DD didn't sign it.
.
Actually it indicates an intent to deceive the other party as well as a likely intent to evade the FECA personal contribution limit of $2700 and other campaign finance laws. If the money had actually come from the fake LLC as Cohen claimed (after initially denying that there was a contract or any payment), then it would be an illegal corporate contribution to the campaign in addition to a failure by the campaign to report.
Cohen could be in other hot water too for legal malpractice although I rather doubt his sole client will file a complaint.
I guess a judge is going to decide it. But have you ever bought a house? I have bought four and sold three and at the closing all of the paperwork has to be signed by the seller and the purchaser and witness or the contracts are unenforceable. If there is one single signature missing the sale can be disputed and won in court because the lack of a signature always makes that part of the contract unenforceable, no matter if money has changed hands, since the judge can in extreme cases order the return of the money.
For instance there is always a clause that the seller testifies that to the best of their knowledge that there are no leaks in the roof or that no person has died in the home in the previous 5 years. The seller has to sign those and the buyer has to sign also. If the seller does not sign and the buyer finds our later that the roof does leak or that someone hung themselves in the garage the year before, then that part of the contract is unenforceable and the buyer can get out of the purchase of the house. If just the seller signs then that part is unenforceable. If just the buyer signs it's unenforceable. Every single part of all of the contracts need to have BOTH signatures or if they are disputed the judge is going to ALWAYS rule that they are unenforceable.
That might be the case if there were actually two parties to the contract but there appears to be only one since the invisible orange-hued "David Dennison" neither signed the contract or paid any money, nor did the bogus shell company mentioned in the contract. For all we know at this point Cohen acted entirely on his own and didn't represent any client.
Nor can an NDA enforce a prohibition on disclosure of anything which was public knowledge prior to the signing of the contract, and many of the details were publicized 5 years before Daniels signed the contract on the eve of the election. Contract remedies can only compensate for the harm actually caused by a breach, they cannot be used to deter or punish and may not enrich, they can't double-dip, etc. From a contract law standpoint the remedies here are arbitrary and unenforceable.
Actually I learned a bit about contract law by buying and selling my various homes.
However I learned the most by having having the services of attorneys in Santa Rosa and L.A. when I was a private computer contractor installing computer systems and property management software in hotels and teaching the staff how to use the systems for a company out of Phoenix at many, many different hotels throughout the U.S. and a few in Canada. Being as I was working for myself for the first time I needed them to help me with my contracts and taxes.
I watched the interview. I don't care about the sex. But I do care that DJT has always conducted himself in a manner only onto himself and believes himself impervious to everything, in addition to also being a liar, cheat and a fraud.
I also believe DJT has involved himself with criminal international elements of which he can't extricate himself even if he sincerely wanted to.
Rumors about Trump and his daughter Ivanka have been swirling around for years. Supposedly it's been going on since she was a very young teen. No one knows if it's true, but the rumors have been there for years and they are not going away. It's been fodder for comedians for a long time.
Liberals here sure have a lot of fantasies about having sex with daughters. Weird in the extreme, but understandable.
skirting the CoC [ph]
It is totally disgusting how you all go on and on about Ivanka. This has been the ugliness by most liberals since Trump was elected. Sex craving minds.
And, yet, it's been over thirty years since Bill and, Monica and, you folks on the right continually pull it out of the trash bin.
Don't have daughters. Next question.
I think that would be a good thing for you to never have daughters, with your comment above.
Seems they forget they took their shots at Clinton and they failed (although they do like to cite Paula Jones getting money from him).
Since when did you stop sniffing around Dems' sex lives? Were they just too tame for you now that we know so much about the seamy, ugly things your people are up to?
Signed,
Donny Trump
It's Ok, Iv'e lodged complaints
It's not just a rumor since Trump said that he wants to bang her. The only questions are whether he acted on that twisted obsession and whether Ivanka was old enough to remember the sexual abuse or even understand what he was doing to her.
"Show me on the $100 where the bad man hurt you."
I have daughters. If I ever met someone who reminded me of them, the last thing on my mind would be sex. It’s no surprise that it is Trump’s first thing.
If I ever met someone who reminded me of them, the last thing on my mind would be sex.
Oh come on, tell the truth.
I guess that's where you and I differ.
So, are you admitting that looking your daughter makes you think of having sex?
Your'e putting a lot of faith in what Daniels is saying. I can buy she was with Trump but all the rest of that was for attention and her lawyer, who wants to get Trump on Campaign Finance violations.
In fact she just sued Trump's lawyer because he violated campaign finance law and defamed her.
.
Sounds like Trump and his attorneys were really stupid to move this to federal court. LOL
If he broke the law, wouldn't you WANT him to be charged with that crime?
His name was not on the agreement. He is going to say he had no knowledge of it and his lawyer (Cohen) will get charged.
Are you going to pretend that this whole thing wasn't yet another get Trump scheme?
That's why liberals must be defeated. Always!
There was a separate but attached legal document that acknowledged that Donald Trump would sign with the pseudonym "David Dennison" to avoid using his real name on the document itself. That's why where he was supposed to sign has the initials DD under the line. That line is blank because he never signed as agreed. Making the agreement invalid.
Cohen will get charged but so will the Trump campaign for the failure to report.
"You Remind Me Of My Daughter"
Definitely should not be considered as part of foreplay. If factual this is a wee bit beyond weird in my little universe.
If some guy said that to me, I would excuse myself to the bathroom and escape out the window.
I know the point of this article is to bash Trump by implying that he wants to have sex with his own daughter because a high priced porn ho says that Trump told her that she reminds him of Ivanka but, even if he said it, does the statement really mean that? Many men marry women who remind them of their mothers without it meaning that they're sexually or romantically interested in their own mother. It just means that they admire women like their mom. And many women also marry men who, in some way, remind them of their father.
Off topic {SP}
I think Trump was acknowledging the great age difference between them , and also thought he was flattering Stormy by comparing her to the incomparable Ivanka, against whom all women should be judged. What makes Ivanka so invaluable? She is Donald Trump's daughter, silly.
There are quite a few photos and videos of Trump in , let's say questionable, poses with his daughter Ivanka. Once a girl reaches 15 or 16 years old they don't usually drape themselves over dad or sit in his lap for publicity related photos.
That was at the school Father Daughter Twerk.
I can not imagine that expression on any adult man's face with any under-aged girl on his lap like that, let alone his own daughter. In fact I can not imagine any adult male having any under-aged girl on his lap like that in the first place. It's damned near child porn.
After looking at that if he still has the support of the Evangelicals then they truly have no values left at all. They obviously leave them at the church door when they walk out on Sunday morning and after that they are meaningless in their day to day lives. Their Christian values exist for about an hour, once a week.
In the middle pic it looks like Ivanka is trying to unzip his fly. He groomed her well.
And that kind of grooming starts young...
He does have a habit of lying about how many stories it is.
You mean this one? The question is how old is she? I'm guessing maybe 13 or 14 myself? No matter really, as this goes far beyond normal daddy/daughter affection, IMHO.
So because Ivanka sits on daddy's lap and because a porn ho said he told her that she reminds of his daughter, that means he's engaged in incest? All this is funny as Trump bashing goes but bashing his daughter is kind of low. If somebody dragged Obama's daughters into an incest joke, liberals would be up in arms.
Well that and pedophilia...
Donny said himself that he walked in and out of teen girls dressing rooms all the time. He was also good friends with Jeffery Epstien. And then, well....
I think you've crossed a line.
Look at the third picture in the three picture array above and tell me truthfully that you think that is a normal way for a young teen daughter to sit on her Daddy's lap (She is not sitting on his lap, she is doing a lap dance) and that expression on his face is a normal expression for a Daddy to have while she is doing it. He looks like he is about to have an orgasm. It's obscene.
What line is that?
I believe that at the time of that photo they were at a party listening to and reacting to music. And I think a still photo can be misleading. Having said that, Trump is the only one responsible for the perception that he had a 'sexual' interest in his daughter. There are pictures and quotes all over the place that show him intentionally creating this perception. I guess at one time he thought it was funny.
What goes around comes around Donald.
Do you have a problem with the truth?
What would Donald Trump have to do for you to stop supporting him?
Any criticism of Vic's Fuhrer will not be tolerated.
Speaking of crossing a line .... is it just me, or is Donald going for tongue?
I'm surprised he let's Jared sleep with her.
Plus Jared is Jewish. That must really piss off Trump's KKK and neo-Nazi buddies.
Here's the difference, Trump used that "you remind me of my daughter" shtick just before Stormy asked to use his restroom before leaving his hotel room, when she came out of the restroom, he was in Stormy's words, "Perched on the bed" with his legs spread, naked.
Sounds like to me you were in the room with them. Photos?
No, I watched 60 minutes last night and, recorded it on my DVR, I'm quoting what Stormy told Anderson Cooper during the interview.
As a ho, Stormy puts a lot of things in her mouth but I don't know if the truth is among them. Interviewing a ho being a ho seems more like a job for the national enquirer than it is for CNN.
Well, she passed a polygraph....lets get donny hooked up and he can refute what she said. No? Didn't think so.
If Trump took a polygraph the needles would flip back and forth so fast they'd snap off! I honestly don't think he remembers how to tell the truth?
As for things in the mouth, Trump needs to stick a sock in his and let adults make some decisions for once!
He's a sociopath so the needle wouldn't budge no matter what he said.
By 1ofm’s logic, all officials up to and including the POTUS get a pass for anything they did with a prostitute, stripper, or porn star. They’re just hos who can’t be trusted, so even if it’s true we must disregard the allegations and give the guy a pass.
Trump would never do a polygraph, he stays as far away from the truth as possible.
Truth is Trump’s kryptonite. Think of a vampire at dawn - that is what Trump’s eventual meeting with Mueller will be like.
That gets an off topic - WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF THESE COMMENTS ?
I did not find the interview very probative, not sure what all the hub bub has been about. Stormy and Trump supposedly had sex once and without a condom (Ooo the horror)
What were there 3 details added that 'we' did not know already (?) Stormy reminded Trump of Ivanka, intelligent and beautiful .. Stormy watched shark week with Trump (providing evidence of what exactly (Trump was not that into her / she was def not into him?) and the alleged threat....
That's it, that is the story? - if the event actually happened the President cheated on his wife (very not cool) .. may as well have come clean .. far less harm would have been done had the President told the 'truth' ... if it did not happen, the same holds true for Stormy - what does this 'story' accomplish, other than to get her job offers (which she said at the start of the interview that she has received job offers)
My hope for all those that cannot breath without stories about the President, is that they get a better story from the Playboy bunny .. still think instead of wasting time on consensual relations, those that say they were assaulted, should be getting as much press attention .. rather than ignored.. (apparently alleged sexual assault does not sell like alleged consensual sex does?)
Hi.
That Stormy person knew that all she had to do was bring Ivanka into the picture to create a filthy scenario for the Trump haters. His word against her word.
What about that $130k hush money? Does your Shitbag just give that to anyone who claims he fucked her?
Talking about the daughter comment!
So daughters are off limits ? What about Roy Moore whom you proudly voted for. ? What about his history of harassing teen girls when he was in his 30's ? They were daughters.
Maybe Trump shouldn't compare porn sluts that he is trying to screw to his daughter. Ever think of that Magnolia?
I don't know that he actually did.
Never was proven. Not Moore's daughters.
I have never paid attention to the claims of incest against Trump - does seem to have been a story that dates back quite a few years .. since he has become President, those that cannot breath without bashing the president seems to desire to toss the accusation around as if it were fact ...
I may have to re watch the interview .. I recall Stormy saying he was 'perched' on the bed .. but I missed the whole he was naked with his legs spend - perhaps my brain could not handle the visual, so blocked it out : )
I've never seen any such claims. But it's clear Shitbag has some very weird ideas about the father-daughter relationship.
So either we believe these women or we don't. No cafeteria rules on this one.
Hopefully not his daughters too but I guess that depends on who you believe.....more than a dozen women ( nine on the record ) whose claims are supported by contemporaneous witnesses when the women were underage or the guy who hired thugs to try to buy off the attorney for one of the women who was 14 when Moore sexually molested her? By the way that attorney has a voice recording of that particular corrupt act.
Herman Cain "Supposedly" had a "Dozen" or so women accusers too.
Where are they now ?
Billy Clinton, you know the one, had an actual BJ in the Oral Office by someone NOT HIS WIFE , and Liberals said it was a witch hunt. Billy also had a few "Child" flights too, but that was one of those "Nothing to see here" thingies from Liberals.
Go figure !
Moore's victims are all still around and they all stand by their claims, but they know that under Alabama law they have no legal recourse. However Leigh Corfman has filed a defamation of character lawsuit against Moore due to the false and defamatory statements he made about her just before and since the election.
The better question is where is Moore and where are all the lawsuits he promised to file against his victims? He hasn't filed even one. Why do you think that is?
The difference between Dems and Republicans is that Dems don't think that sex between consenting adults is any of their business, while Republicans think that the consensual sex of a Democratic president should be a very public matter.
I doubt many Dems really care that Trump sleeps around on all his wives or that he pays for sex or that he refuses to use a condom even when screwing a porn star and a Playboy bunny. We all knew that stuff before the election anyway.
The parts which are of interest to the public are his rather creepy sexual obsession with his own daughters and his elaborate and abusive (and criminal) legal machinations to keep his accusers silent regardless of whether it was a consensual affair or a rape. Most recently we learned that his thugs have even physically threatened Stormy Daniels and her daughter.
Then STFU about Trump from something that supposedly happened years ago.
The MSM doesn't find them "Relevant" anymore. No News is "Bad" news ?
As I said it's not the sex or Trump's reckless behavior or his really bizarre sexual fetishes which are the issue for Dems, but rather the abusive legal aspects and his threats against the women to keep them quiet. And it possibly relates to the kompromat which the Russians obviously have on him, that fact that he's desperate to keep all this stuff a secret from the public.
Sex just seems to be the issue for bible-babbling conservatives....but apparently only when a Dem is involved. Your hypocrisy on this issue is rather obvious just as it was decades ago when the people whining loudest about Clinton's affairs were the Republicans in Congress who were all screwing around on their wives at the time.
Huh? You think the MSM needs to keep reporting a story after it's been reported in full?
The only recent news is that Corfman's defamation lawsuit is proceeding in court, and new evidence just came out a few days ago about Moore's and Bannon's illegal efforts to discredit her and bribe her attorney. That voice recording and related evidence (texts, emails, etc) will no doubt be a big factor in the lawsuit.
The best part is that Moore is now using his legal troubles as a new fund raising scam. He's no longer using just Christian sharia law or Teh Gayz to scam the gullible bible-babblers.
I know.
Sounds like He's taken a page from the Liberal Playbook on this type matter.
What was it "Hillary" said about her "Husbands' Accusers again ?
Oh ya.....THIS:
"This is—the great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president. A few journalists have kind of caught on to it and explained it. But it has not yet been fully revealed to the American public. And actually, you know, in a bizarre sort of way, this may do it.”
“I think we’re going to find some other things. And I think that when all of this is put into context, and we really look at the people involved here, look at their motivations and look at their backgrounds, look at their past behavior, some folks are going to have a lot to answer for."
Weird....ain't it ?
Ya, they are......Or do we talk about the Obama's?
"Daughter" not "Daughters", he's never said anything remotely creepy about Tiffany. Of course I don't think I've even heard him even mention her, while I've heard him rave on and on about the daughter he said he'd be dating if he weren't her father...
Actually he did when she was an infant. She must have rejected his advances since then because he avoids talking about her now.
Right, I don't even know if he has daughters. He went after other people's daughters as a full grown adult in his thirties.
No excuse for that shit.
Never.
Moore has a stepdaughter and 3 sons. I think all his kids work at his Foundation for Christian Sharia Law, scamming money from gullible bible-babblers. His son Caleb keeps on getting arrested for drug abuse and theft.....I wonder how long he'll manage to stay out of prison now that his dad is no longer the chief Mullah on the state supreme court?
I really enjoy watching rightwingers whose heads exploded over Clinton's blow job now just shrugging their shoulders about decades of TheShitbag's adultery, sexual battery and general nastiness toward women. (There's your cue to register righteous indignation and claim you're no rightwinger and you never attacked Clinton at which we will all have a good laugh at your desperate attempt to slither out out this).
righteous indignation over what exactly?
Both Bill and Donald could have just told the truth, or perhaps Donald is (?) who knows (we all know Bill did not) .. does not change the fact that I do not understand the hoop la either way. There are women out there claiming to have been "assaulted" by both Bill and Donald .. prob should give them the time of day? over consensual relations?
Rather certain that the comments that I have made on this subject matter, have been consistent in calling for those that claim sexual assault not be forgotten - feel free to dig through my posting history and see what you can find regarding what I said about Monica and Bill Clinton. He certainly humiliated his wife while in office (I do recall saying that .. and I did make comments regarding H. standing by her man)
Good luck Atheist!
Thanks, but luck isn't necessary. I notice you really didn't directly address the double standard although you did kinda-sorta admit to it by telling us a couple of your recollections. Have you criticized Shitbag for humiliating his wife yet and just what are your thoughts about Melania "standing by her man.?"
And she, after her Bill talked with people such as Billy Graham, decided to forgive him for the sake of keeping her family together. She did the Christian thing (she is a life long and devoted Methodist) and now her family is stable, by all accounts her and Bill are very happy together, their daughter is happily married to a wonderful man and have two Grandchildren to spend time with, to give love to and to celebrate holidays with as a happy family. Instead of her marriage ending in divorce her and her husband were able to move past his sins and through her strength and forgiveness, become a happily married couple again. Christians preach for this sort of thing to happen exactly like this and should be applauding her and Bill instead of hypocritically attacking them for what happened.
Bingo. But they don't do that because they're slimy hypocrites. Instead they praise the thrice-married whore monger who was screwing a Playboy bunny bareback shortly after his wife gave birth to his son.
I can't blame Melaria for sleeping in a separate room or for demanding that he always wear a condom.
No, the head exploding was the progressives and the media at the time. Don't worry they covered his dirty ass and his wife's dirty fat ass later
I would be dumbfounded if she has sex with him at all any longer.
And I still say the biggest victim is Barron. I saw him getting off from Air Force One again the other day and he looks like a grim hollow eyed zombie. I mean I'm sure he knows how to read. That kid is headed for some really serious therapy in his future. Either that or drugs, booze and suicide attempts. I've seen that same look before.
And we can thank the MSM for that
and he can thank his parents for doing it to him...besides they are the ones who trot him out for viewing like a prop...not the mainstream media.
He's out there less than any other first family children. Why don't you just admit that only progressives would stoop so low as to go after someone's children?
Scum
No. We can thank his Father.
So you agree with punishing his children for what he does?
I'm not surprised
Does Chelsea Clinton ring a bell? I don't recall any on the right decrying when try when they went after mentioned her in their attacks on Bill Clinton.
But...oh...that's right. It's OK for the right to do it, but, not when the shoe is on the other foot. Hypocrisy much, eh?
It is his father that is punishing Barron. Barron looks worse every time he is seen in public, which is whenever his parents put him out there. He looks like he is suffering from depression and like he'd rather be anywhere other then where he is at the time. He is always scowling or has a very sad look on his face and his eyes always look blank and hollow. I seriously believe he needs help now and is going to need serious therapy in the future or, IMHO, he will turn to drugs, booze and most likely suicide attempts when he gets older and that's in the not to distant future. That is not a shot at him or an insult. It is honest concern for his well being from someone who has been there.
Link please
Absolutely not, and don't try deflecting by putting word in my mouth.
However, the right didn't seem to be that concerned about punishing Chelsea when Bill Clinton was being persecuted for his accused sexual misconduct.
Look it up yourself. Or have you forgotten how to use Google when it comes to things that the right did?
"Scum"
The only "scum" in this is his Father.
Like a bullied student in middle school?
I suppose all he has to do is turn on the TV, it dosen't have to be the news, the late night talk shows alone would do it. Maybe he likes "the View" or how about "SNL" or maybe he saw Kathy Griffin holding his head or maybe he uses social media. It dosen't matter where he looks does it?
If you cant back it up, we don't want to hear it
Skirting the CoC [ph]
I don't have to elaborate, do I?
Yes you do!
"Scum"
Ohhh.....so now you are a clairvoyant? You know what I think and what is in my heart?
Skirting the CoC [ph]
I go by what you say.
Comment removed for context [ph]
And that is a code violation!
Actually RW I believe the insult "scum" was a personal attack directed at me since he was answering one of my comments..
Nope, If you can take it in context it was directed at progressives
"If you cant back it up, we don't want to hear it"
Same thing can be said for the crap that the right pukes out.
In fact, no matter how many links I would provide you and the rest of your biased righties would just say they were form some Leftist propaganda and of no value. So....look it up on a site that you feel only provides what you want to hear.
And.....I'd like to see you or anyone else here try to shut me up. I have as much right to voice my views, beliefs and opinions as much as you or anyone else here. And I don't see YOU providing any links to back up what YOU say.
Hypocrisy is strong with this one.
"Why don't you..." at the start of the sentence directs the question and the sentence toward me and the "scum" toward me. That is the context. It is an insult to me. Either that or you really need to work on your sentence structure.
Flag it!! I'll gladly take the deletion. I stand by what I said.
I didn't make the claim - YOU DID
And the following sentence dealt with progressives...followed by the word Scum. That's kind of straight forward
I didn't make the claim - YOU DID'
Well....then since you are so big on showing proof, where is the link to what YOU said? Care to provide that for us?
I have. I don't hesitate when it's so blatant
Thank you. Now go pat yourself on the back for being such a good boy.
Have a good night
No. He looks like a son of parents who can't stand each other and are staying together in a farce of a marriage and that the farce is being played out on public. And that he has to play a part in it that he is being forced to play. No matter what all of the shows you mention say, it is his parents who are putting him through this, not the shows. If his parents gave a damn about him Melania would move back to NY and put him back in his old school with his old friends and stop displaying him like a prop every time they fly anywhere and make him pretend that they are a happy family.
I know that expression on his face because I have seen it on mine, though not in public. I know that withdrawn look, that blank stare, those hollow eyes and that obvious look of depression and suppressed emotional pain. I know the look of a kid headed for a serious crash and no, it's not the MSM pushing him toward it. It's his parents.
"Have a good night"
And you as well.
It was one sentence. "Why don't you..." was one sentence. There was no following sentence and that one sentence was directed at me, which makes the insult directed at me. I flagged it, but if the moderators remove it or not does not matter to me, I will still take it as I believe you meant it, as a personal insult that you are trying to slip in past the CoC.
Yes, on your thoughts except for the travelling. He has to travel with them.
I recognize the look on Barron's face. He is one miserable child.
Yes they should travel together on some occasions, but he could board earlier and not have to stand there looking like hell as Trump and Melania wave at the camera's, while he looks like he'd rather be getting root canal surgery. They, his father I believe really, use him as a prop.
You don't see the period after the word family?
I hate repeating myself, but the word scum follows the second sentence. I think that is the only time I've had someone try and twist my words. And you did try - to help RW, obviously. It turns out she didn't need your help. Perrie feels it's ok to have this discussion resume in the gutter. My mistake.
The insult is obvious. The way it was worded directed the insult at me, not at progressives in general with no twisting of the words.
If you did not intend it to be an insult, then I am sorry. However the way you wrote it can only be read as one with no twisting of the words.
Fair enough, but to say that to someone you just had sex with is beyond creepy and weird. My daughter is a very attractive but never in a million years would I ever even THINK about comparing her to someone I just had sex with. No way, that's just gross.
Off Topic {SP}
Didn't watch, don't care anyway.
What happened to the "60 Minutes" episodes of Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Broaddrick; and all the other victims of Billy Clinton and his approving and enabling wife, Hillary? Off Topic {SP}
These latest strands of scurrilous spaghetti thrown at the wall of public opinion trying to have the public turn on Trump will not stick any more than the others have. The public is weary of all this drama and are very bored with it. They are angry at the Dems for being against and resisting Trump on every issue. They will take their revenge in November.
Weren't those claims either adjudicated or proven false? For example Juanita Broaddrick renounced her false claims when she was placed under oath. Funny that you didn't know that.
While I think there are many shades of grey when people in positions of power have affairs or when there's a power differential in an affair, my main takeaway is that Clinton seems to genuinely love women and women love him back, while women seem to despise Trump and his blatant misogyny is just a small part of the reason. I seriously doubt Clinton ever paid for sex while Trump does it out of habit because he knows that no woman would otherwise have sex with him.
What's most relevant here is that there are no claims that Clinton ever tried to pay anyone hush money to bury a story before it became public. Trump has apparently done that multiple times with women he sexually assaulted or had creepy affairs with......and we know that for a fact due to the incompetence of his corrupt attorneys.
Oh, I'm sure it was just a lapse of memory.
She claimed, under oath, that she filed a false affidavit denying the rape allegation because, as she said, she way trying to protect her privacy and remain out of the Clinton story.
I'm surprised you didn't know that.
I bet you would have if Donny was a democrat.
So now you're claiming that she lied under oath and lied to the FBI? Both are crimes.....do you think she should be prosecuted? Was she lying then or is she lying now?
No, I'm surprised you don't know this. She signed an affidavit to avoid being dragged into the Paula Jones circus. Later, Ken Starr made her testify under oath and, under oath, she admitted signing a false affidavit and testified that Bill Clinton had raped her. She was given immunity for signing the false affidavit but could have been prosecuted for lying during her sworn testimony detailing her rape by Bill Clinton. She wasn't prosecuted, of course.
Some rape victims value privacy. Is that a surprise to you as well?
Conservative logic: "All of Clinton's accusers are absolutely 100% credible and telling the truth, no doubt of it!!! But, none of trumps accusers are credible and they are all liars, even if they have taken a polygraph examination and passed it, 100%!!!!"
They seriously think this way, it's really sad.
He was a Democrat when this occurred.
So she lied under oath in her affidavit and lied to the FBI, or did she lie under oath in court when prompted by a guy who helped cover up rapes at a university and committed some rather serious ethical violations when he was special prosecutor including illegal collusion with the attorneys for Paul Jones?
Either way it sounds like you're saying Broaddrick should be prosecuted, but note that in her affidavit to Ken Starr she said that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way. Unlike what Trump has done repeatedly.
60 Minutes was LAST night, was a democrat then too?
Why are you saying things that aren't true? I thought you were familiar with this matter? The FBI interviewed he. She told the FBI Clinton raped her and the FBI didn't charge her with lying. .Comment removed for skirting the CoC. jwc2blue
Comment removed for skirting the CoC. jwc2blue
It sounds like you admitted she lied under oath at least one of those times, but for some reason you think she told the truth when she was coached by the guy who covered up rapes at Baylor U. And even then if we assume she told the truth on that occasion then you're admitting that Clinton didn't pressure or bribe her in any way.....unlike what Trump has repeatedly done.
Off Topic {SP}
Donald Trump’s alleged extramarital affairs before he became president have been big news recently, and there’s one common thread in both allegations: The now-president reportedly told women he wanted to sleep with that they reminded him of his daughter.
First, CNN aired an interview with Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model who claims that she had a 10-month affair with Trump in 2006. During that time, McDougal says Trump compared her with his daughter, Ivanka Trump. “He’s very proud of Ivanka, as he should be,” McDougal told Anderson Cooper in the interview. “She’s a brilliant woman, she’s beautiful, you know, that’s his daughter and he should be proud of her. He said I was beautiful like her and, you know, ‘you’re a smart girl.’ There wasn’t a lot of comparing, but there was some. I heard a lot about her.”
Then in an interview Sunday on “ 60 Minutes ,” adult film star Stormy Daniels, who says she also had an affair with Trump in 2006, said he also compared her to his daughter. “He was like, ‘Wow, you — you are special. You remind me of my daughter.’ You know — he was like, ‘You’re smart and beautiful, and a woman to be reckoned with, and I like you. I like you.’”
Whenever I'm screwing around on my wife I always talk about how hot my daughters are......right before I insist on not wearing a condom. I'm a True Christian.
Well, we all know he wants to fuck his daughter, assuming he hasn't already so this isn't that much of a revelation. Ideally when all is said and done evangelicals and the GOP will all shut the fuck up about having any moral standards, because their support for Trump clearly shows that they do not.
Apparently the current Republican definition of a traditional marriage is a man, 3 wives, 2 porn stars with guest roles by his daughter, pageant contestants, and various reality stars.
LOL.....thank you for that Miss Bowers!
I love Betty Bowers but I am not even in her area code.
I changed my avatar just for Holy week. Ya like it?
I have only ONE comment to make on this article:
There are people who will do, or say, ANYTHING for the right sum.