Holocaust Denial On Palestinian Authority TV – Palestinian Writer Hani Abu Zeid: The Jews Colluded With Hitler In The 'False Holocaust'
During an interview on the official Palestinian Authority TV channel, Palestinian writer and political analyst Hani Abu Zeid said that "They used to cry about the false Holocaust in the days of Hitler, the scope of which was not that large." The TV host added that it was "a lie that they spread worldwide," and Abu Zeid agreed, saying: "Yes, it was a lie, and many Israelis, or many Jews, colluded with Hitler, so that he would facilitate the bringing of settlers to Palestine." The interview aired on April 10.
Hani Abu Zeid: "The [Israeli] soldier, the officers behind him, and even the Israeli war [sic] minister, and above him, Netanyahu should stand trial as war criminals. The accumulation of cases, one after the other... The Israelis will end up shedding tears of blood [out of regret] for their current conduct. They used to cry about the false Holocaust in the days of Hitler, the scope of which was not that large. I'd like to point out..."
Interviewer: "The [Holocaust] is a lie that they spread worldwide."
Hani Abu Zeid: "Yes, it was a lie, and many Israelis, or many Jews, colluded with Hitler, so that he would facilitate the bringing of settlers to Palestine."
There may be links in the Original Article that have not been reproduced here.
Tags
Who is online
75 visitors
Dear Friend Bob Nelson: I think it is clear and obvious where the truth is in this matter.
Enoch.
Of course... but we get so many teary-eyed, hand-wringing laments about the poor suffering Palestinians, that some people forget... more or less willfully... what Palestinian leadership would do if it had the opportunity.
and that would be what the ottoman empire did to the Armenian Christians?
or what happened in the union of soviet socialist republics in the 30s with all the purges ?
or what happened in Germany in the 40s under the Nazis?
what happened in China in the 50s with their own set of purges and isolationalism?
or Tibet?
Cambodia in the 70s
pick a country in Africa from the 70s up to today.
the eradication , of dissenting and dangerous ideas to their own direction and power. yes I think we all know what they would do given the chance , and its happened a lot more often than some will admit under names they don't like to admit.
The question is will the world today do what it did in the past and turn a blind and jaded eye to actions and intentions like mentioned?
It's more than that just forgetting. It's revisionist history by a people who want to be considered serious partners in peace.
btw.. America still does not recognize the Armenian Genocide, because we want to have relations with Turkey, and that is just wrong. The Turks invented the first modern genocide and inspired Hitler:
Anyone who denies the facts of the Holocaust is despicable, and possibly dangerous.
People prioritize their desires. Truth seems to be an easy thing for some to sacrifice. Denying the Holocaust has got to rank near the top of the list of intellectual dishonesty. Truly sickening.
Let us not forget, however, that perhaps to save themselves, or perhaps with the false hope that their negotiating efforts might convince Hitler to deport Jews to Palestine instead of massacring them, there may well have been some naive errant desperate Jews who did try to negotiate, and it is with the knowledge of that kernel of possibility that such arguments as this article contains may have been created.
We do know, don't we, that there were collaborators - George Soros has been accused of having been one.
But when it comes to collaboration with the Nazis, the Muslims were by far the winners of that game:
And Himmler, and you know what HE was in charge of.
What I find most interesting in the saber rattling rhetoric is the denial, followed by the threat to "do it again".
Horror is unreasonable.