╌>

Texas teenager attacked on video for wearing Make America Great Again hat

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  96ws6  •  8 years ago  •  298 comments

Texas teenager attacked on video for wearing Make America Great Again hat

A 16-year-old boy has been verbally abused and assaulted at a restaurant for wearing one of   Donald Trump’s   trademark “Make America Great Again” hats.

The ordeal, which took place in San Antonio, was caught on camera and has been widely shared.

The clip shows an unidentified suspect chucking a drink in Hunter Richard’s face while saying “you ain’t supporting s***” before leaving the restaurant with his red hat.


Mr Hunter, who is from the Texas city, was having a meal with his friends at a Whataburger restaurant in Thousands Oaks when the incident took place.




Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
1  author  96WS6    8 years ago

More tolerance from the left.  MadMax and her moodbats strike again!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  96WS6 @1    8 years ago

Another left wing thug. Mr Koni Jiminez succeeded in getting his punk ass fired from his job and arrested for theft and assault in just a few short hours. Word on the street is that he was inspired by Maxine Water's recent bad behavior to pick on a kid. Hope he's prosecuted and tossed in jail. Apparently he has a rather long rap sheet. I might start wearing one of these myself!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    8 years ago
thug

Digging a whole

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    8 years ago

Uh....if the word fits, and it does, it should be used.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.4  Tacos!  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    8 years ago
thug
Oh, you have a problem with that word and its usage?
thug
THəɡ/
noun
1.a violent person, especially a criminal.
synonyms: ruffian, hooligan, vandal, hoodlum, gangster, villain, criminal;

Yep, I would say the word was used correctly. 

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
1.2.5  nightwalker  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2.2    8 years ago

I totally agree, and when people see a authoritarian action or hear a statement that sounds like Goebbels talking about a Hitler quote people should be allowed to use words like Nazi, dictator or fascist if that's what they're seeing/hearing. If the description fits, wear it.

Funny thing is, a lot of ultra-conservatives seem to hate those descriptive words, but just LOVE to hang derogatory labels on everyone and everything else. They can dish it out, but can't take it, sorta like snowflakes.

Ever notice that? Happy

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
1.2.6  Spikegary  replied to  nightwalker @1.2.5    8 years ago

Which really has nothing to do with this adult attacking a 16 year old boy becausse he wore a hat in public.  If that's acceptable to you, it says far more about you than about the attacker or the kid.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
1.2.8  nightwalker  replied to  Spikegary @1.2.6    8 years ago

What the adult did, if the news is correct, was diffidently not right, but the kid survived and the judge will probably make the man buy him a new hat, so this story disturbs less then some others where people die or get seriously hurt.

I'm just not so quick to get a Texas necktie and lynch somebody for THIS kind of assault. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  96WS6 @1    8 years ago

Thanks for the seed. As I have often said, people are putting themselves in harms way when they put that hat on.  What terrorizes American society today is weak minded leftists inspired by people like Maxine Waters, Antifa and "Black Lives Matter". They have the entire nation living in fear.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
1.5  nightwalker  replied to  96WS6 @1    8 years ago

Soooo the idea that this might be sort of pushback is right out the window?

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6  Skrekk  replied to  96WS6 @1    8 years ago

Are you claiming that Trump supporters shouldn't be ridiculed?

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6.2  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.1    8 years ago

I was just asking since ridiculing MAGA hat wearers seems like the right thing to do.    The teen must be a real dimwit.    Maybe he can trade it in for the new model:

Image result for russia usa hat

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6.4  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.3    8 years ago

Wait.....I thought incivility was the conservative mantra in the Trump era.    Didn't you folks recently persecute a teenager in Florida merely because he advocated for gun control after he was almost killed at school in a mass shooting?     I think you folks called him a "crisis actor" or something, while other conservatives issued death threats and tried to get his college scholarships revoked.    Perhaps that's what's going on in this case except the "crisis" involves a Pepsi and a hat worn by blithering morons rather than an AK-47 and a bunch of dead children?

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6.6  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.5    8 years ago
Now, if you can show that the thug who assaulted the kid at Whataburger has been influenced in his actions by the events elsewhere, feel free to do so.

Didn't Trump say that his thugish supporters should beat up the black protesters at his rallies?    Sounds like karma is visiting those racist Trump supporters.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.6.7  bugsy  replied to  Skrekk @1.6.6    8 years ago

He did? How about showing proof of that bullshit...

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.6.9  Jasper2529  replied to  Skrekk @1.6.4    8 years ago
I thought incivility was the conservative mantra in the Trump era.  

Please "think" again, and while you're thinking take a gander at the incivility of Madonna, Kathy Griffin, Maxine Waters, Michelle Wolf, Robert deNiro and MANY others. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.6.11  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.10    8 years ago
Ronald Reagan — ‘It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.’

Donald Trump,  just-remember-what-youre-seeing-and-what-youre-reading-is-not-whats-happening

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
1.6.13  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.12    8 years ago

nope just pointing out a hypocrisy that struck me funny

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6.14  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.8    8 years ago

Maybe you forgot what I asked---to prove that someone else's actions caused the thug to assault a teenager.

I'm curious.....do you use the word "thug" to describe the Trump supporters who threatened David Hogg and his fellow students or do you just use it to describe black folks who aren't amused by people who support a traitorous white supremacist.

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6.16  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.15    8 years ago
I use it on anyone stupid enough to commit assault over someone's freaking OPINION.

Can you cite an example where you used "thug" to describe a conservative white guy like the conservative freaks who attacked David Hogg for expressing his opinion, or perhaps a cop who shot an unarmed black person?

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.6.18  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @1.6.17    8 years ago
Now,. can you provide one single example of me even commenting on a thread about David Hogg being assaulted? And not condemning the attacker?

As I said, can you provide any examples at all of where you've used the word "thug" to describe a white right-winger?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3  It Is ME    8 years ago

The LIBERAL MSM is running with the...."There "May" have been some racial slurs by the teens before the guy "Attacked" the teens."

Go figure !

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
3.1  author  96WS6  replied to  It Is ME @3    8 years ago

Yea because there has never been a wacko liberal that has attacked someone simply because they had different opinions./s  Never mind the High ranks are calling for harassing their political opponents and they think there should be "uprisings all over the country"      How predictable.  He is following the handbook to the letter, isn't he?  LMFAO!

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  96WS6 @3.1    8 years ago

Unbelievable ! Face Palm

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
3.1.2  author  96WS6  replied to  It Is ME @3.1.1    8 years ago

TOTALLY believable I'm afraid.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3.1.3  It Is ME  replied to  96WS6 @3.1.2    8 years ago

True !

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.2  Tacos!  replied to  It Is ME @3    8 years ago
The LIBERAL MSM is running with the...."There "May" have been some racial slurs by the teens before the guy "Attacked" the teens."

Cuz that makes it ok. /s

The Western (America and Europe) Left has become an ideology of thuggery. Not that this hasn't happened in other parts of the world, but I just never thought that - considering America's tradition of respecting free speech - it would happen here.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3.2.1  It Is ME  replied to  Tacos! @3.2    8 years ago

When it comes to the Left and Progressives....History be damned.

You'd think ….. funny word Think when it comes to Liberal land...… they would have figured out after a bazillion years of human existence.....Socialism and the Progressive way doesn't work. If it did, EVERY Nation would be "Lefty Progressive Socialists"....and it would be "One World" right NOW.

This country is only 200 years or so old, and these Lefty types want to bring us back to the olde world age that most of the World abandoned before.  The "try at it again" New World EU order is a complete failure !

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
3.3  Ender  replied to  It Is ME @3    8 years ago

The video shows very little. Seems we are only seeing a ten second spot. You nor I know what transcribed before and after.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
3.3.1  sixpick  replied to  Ender @3.3    8 years ago

That's true, but it looks like it would have been a pretty stupid thing to make any slurs at this fellow who looks like he just got back from an ISIS training camp and if the boy in the foreground is any indication of the rest of them, he looks pretty frail.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3.3.2  It Is ME  replied to  Ender @3.3    8 years ago
You nor I know what transcribed before and after

You did notice I posted : "The MSM is running with...…"

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  It Is ME @3    8 years ago

The LIBERAL MSM is running with the...."There "May" have been some racial slurs by the teens before the guy "Attacked" the teens."

Maybe liberals should do like conservatives and just demand video and audio proof that there weren’t racial slurs.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3.4.1  It Is ME  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.4    8 years ago

“an article was released saying someone who was in the restaurant (even tho the only ones in the restaurant was my group and the guy who confronted us’s group.) said that we had provoked the man with racial slurs and much worse things, which never happened…this article was pulled due to “concerns about the legitimacy of the statements.”

"KENS-TV in San Antonio reported Thursday, “Witness claims viral Whataburger attack may have been motivated by racist remarks“
The article has since been edited to retract outrageously inflammatory racist comments an alleged witness claimed to have heard."

"WFAA-TV, a sister station to KENS, picked up the article and has not corrected it as of Friday evening."

"he Austin sister station to KENS AND WFAA, KVUE-TV posted a correction and retraction."

"The national media, led by the New York tabloids Post and Daily News, are repeating without verifying the racist smears against the boys."

"The Post linked to an article at WFMY-TV that has been pulled."

"The bogus Daily News article was picked up and repeated by the San Diego Union-Tribune."

"Inquistr repeated the smear - Inquistr linked to the uncorrected WFAA repeat from KENS."

"thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/outrage-media-falsely-smears-whataburger-maga-hat-attack-teen-victims-as-racists/"

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.4.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  It Is ME @3.4.1    8 years ago

He said she said then?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
3.4.3  Ender  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.4.2    8 years ago

Exactly. Odd that I have heard no employee account.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
3.4.4  It Is ME  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.4.2    8 years ago

Video tells the story. The retractions and take downs in the media is coming due to no witness actually existed that they, the MSM, were hanging their hats on, on the possible "Racial Slur caused it" faux reporting.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
3.4.6  nightwalker  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.4    8 years ago

Can we use edits like you guys do to?

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
3.4.7  nightwalker  replied to  It Is ME @3.4.1    8 years ago

Come on, who in their right mind would think a nice MAGA hat wearing trump supporter would be so rude as to make racist remarks to someone? 16 year olds are always so calm and mature..so quiet and respectful...how could them evil commies even THINK such a thing.  goofy

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
3.5  nightwalker  replied to  It Is ME @3    8 years ago

Yes, and the far-right is going with the same old, old "I wasn't doing ANYTHING and was viciously attacked for no reason at all."

LOL

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
3.5.1  Spikegary  replied to  nightwalker @3.5    8 years ago

Let's see, there is video showing what the assailant did.  There is no supporting evidence to what the LWNJ supporters are saying.  Yeah, that whole proof thing.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
3.5.2  nightwalker  replied to  Spikegary @3.5.1    8 years ago

Funny thing, about that long, detailed clip. I've never seen a all-night eatery where there weren't a least several people in it at any hour. Is Whataburger 24 hrs? Funny how these things always seem to happen without other witnesses. What about the cook, the guy in the white hat at the end, wouldn't he be a witness? No waitresses in Whataburger?

A little suspicious of some clips as case-hardened evidence. Be interesting to see where it goes. Winking 2

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

A racist slur from a violent left winger.  

Sadly common place. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    8 years ago

Is this a common type of behavior amongst liberals, or would that be a "sweeping generalization"?thinking

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
4.1.1  zuksam  replied to  Greg Jones @4.1    8 years ago
Is this a common type of behavior amongst liberal

No most would never do this type of thing but that's not to say they're against it.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
4.1.2  nightwalker  replied to  Greg Jones @4.1    8 years ago

Beats me. Is killing two people on a bus because they didn't want to listen to ranting at a couple of girls or ramming a crowds of people with a vehicle (funny, isn't that out of the terrorist handbook?) or just shoot at a crowd of people the way all ultra-conservatives work?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    8 years ago

The guy was fired from his job, which was appropriate. People should not lay hands on one another.

---------------

Donald Trump's speech last night at a Montana rally was ridiculous, embarrassing, idiotic, offensive and beneath the dignity of his office. This fool has conned many people , including teenagers, into wearing his hat. (Available starting at 20$ , and up, at Trump's merchandise web site). 

We are at the BEGINNING of the incivility, not the end. And Donald Trump, asshole of assholes, is largely , no, predominantly, to blame. 

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1  author  96WS6  replied to  JohnRussell @5    8 years ago

He assaulted the kid and stole his personal property.  Jail time is appropriate.  Even though he is a liberal.

I couldn't help noticing that you in no way condemned the attack and instead made an excuse as to why it is OK (TRUMP HYSTERIA!) and that "this is just the beginning".  

I know you are better than this John.  ( deleted ) 

BTW you really think this is more Trump's fault than Waters?  REALLY???? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  96WS6 @5.1    8 years ago

The """***Trump Supporters***""" are the ones who have lost their minds. Trump talks at his rallies with the intrelligence and modes of expression of a child. Never heard a damn one of you in shock or dismay about that. All you do is react with glee when "liberals" get attacked and belittled by that idiot. 

If you want incivility (and you do or you wouldn't be supporting Trump) you are going  to get it. It is what it is. 

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1.3  author  96WS6  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    8 years ago
If you want incivility (and you do or you wouldn't be supporting Trump) you are going  to get it. It is what it is. 

So to be clear you agree with Waters IN LARGE TEXT.  So now it is OK to harass your political opponents as long as you don't agree with them?    I am sad for what you have become John.  You used to be somewhat reasonable.   I guess the gloves are off and you want civil war?  Or to trash the economy?  Whatever it takes to get rid of Trump just like Meyer said and damn the suffering?  (Never mind you know damn well he won't suffer if the economy collapses like most the rest of his political "friends" will)   That's how you roll now?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.2    8 years ago

Because you all act like people are "uncivil" in a vacuum. Your hero has been provoking incivility for at least three years. You guys ignore it. It's bizarre, "[deleted]"

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1.6  author  96WS6  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.5    8 years ago
that is sort of the nature of """***Trump Supporters***""". 

Gee, I wonder what would happen if I used a sweeping generalizations of liberals and violence.  In case you were wondering, this is sarcasm.  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.8  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    8 years ago

No...it Maxine's fault, along with Pelosi, Schumer, Little Debbie Wasserman, Warren, et al.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.9  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  96WS6 @5.1    8 years ago
He assaulted the kid and stole his personal property.  Jail time is appropriate.

It doesn't appear as if he touched the kid, and all he stole was a $20 hat so it's a misdemeanor. This is just more right wing faux victimization rhetoric. Calling people names and stealing their baseball caps is pretty much a daily occurrence at any high  school in America. Is it childish? Yes. Is it stupid? Yes. But the faux outrage from Fox and the right is pure fantasy, none of them actually give a crap about this kid, they're just looking to complain about anything the supposed "left" does. This fool who took the hat might have no political affiliation and is just an asshole. The President has set the tone and this is just a symptom of his own incivility. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.7    8 years ago

And Trump isn't able to control his emotions because.............? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.11  JohnRussell  replied to  96WS6 @5.1.3    8 years ago

You have no argument 96W. I never said I supported violence. I don't. 

If people want to embarrass """***Trump Supporters***""" in public that is up to them. I would probably only do it to a select few of trump officials, not some kid in a fast food restaurant. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.12  Greg Jones  replied to  96WS6 @5.1.6    8 years ago
Gee, I wonder what would happen if I used a sweeping generalizations of liberals and violence.

Yeah, I get dinged for it all the time. Prolly end up getting banned. crying

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.15  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.13    8 years ago
Are you capable of addressing the topic of THIS seed?

I have. I said the guy who did it was appropriately fired from his job. If the kid wants to press charges that would be ok too. 

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1.17  author  96WS6  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.10    8 years ago
And Trump isn't able to control his emotions because.............?

How Ironic.  After all the hysterical posts and posts advocating violence because you agree with the attacker that you have put on this seed and you are still trying to convince us all we need to be concerned about Trumps's emotions?  You folks still don't realize you are your own worst enemy.  After you lose you will blame everything and everyone else and try to change the laws again.   I love it.LOL

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.18  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.9    8 years ago
This is just more right wing faux victimization rhetoric. Calling people names and stealing their baseball caps is pretty much a daily occurrence at any high school.

Yeah, but this wasn't high school, and it's an adult punk with a rap sheet assaulting a kid. Is that OK with you?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.20  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.5    8 years ago
Your hero has been provoking incivility for at least three years.

Because people were never rude, childish, or violent before Trump decided to run for president. Makes No Sense Face Palm

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.21  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XDm9mm @5.1.19    8 years ago
The lowlife scumbag thug that assaulted the teenager is a 30 year old man.

Which is why I called it childish and stupid, but it still doesn't rise to the level of actual "assault" where the idiot should serve jail time as some on the right have suggested.

Assault: verb - make a physical attack on. noun - a physical attack

Unless you equate a thrown drink in the face "a physical attack" I don't see how anyone is calling this an "assault". If that's the case then every water balloon fight should be considered a gang war. That's why I called this obviously faux outrage fake, a bunch of partisan idiots screaming about a minor incident of a very likely drunk idiot in an all-night diner being a drunk idiot. This is not any sort of reflection on "the left" as so many half wit righties want to make it.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5.1.22  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.1    8 years ago
If you want incivility (and you do or you wouldn't be supporting Trump) you are going

No excuse for incivility like that.  None.   

I did notice he didn't try to take a hat off a Marine or Soldier fresh out of boot or just back from deployment.   Snowflake would have got his ass kicked.   No doubt about it.

Watch out who wish incivility on.   Not all of us are 16 year kids.   In fact, most aren't.   You are going to lose this one John if it persists.   Lose it badly.

 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.23  Tacos!  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.21    8 years ago
it still doesn't rise to the level of actual "assault" where the idiot should serve jail time as some on the right have suggested.

Technically, it's a battery, defined usually as a harmful or offensive contact. Throwing a drink on someone certainly qualifies and commonly results in jail time. Assault is basically the attempt to commit a battery (I'm summarizing to keep it simple).

Taking the hat is a robbery, which is a theft by force or fear (threat of force). Robbery is typically a felony.

Yeah, I'd expect him to do some jail time, particularly - as has been reported - if the guy has a record already.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.24  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Tacos! @5.1.23    8 years ago
Throwing a drink on someone certainly qualifies and commonly results in jail time.

I highly doubt it "commonly results" in jail time, I could only find one account online of anyone being arrested for throwing a drink and they didn't serve time, they were fined. If it's a hot liquid or spit which can cause actual bodily harm then you might have a point, but there aren't many cases of just cold beverages being considered so harmful that the perpetrator was given jail time for it. If you can find some, please do link. As it stands this early morning incident should be chalked up to a likely drunk lone asshole doing what he does best, being an asshole.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
5.1.26  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.21    8 years ago

a lot of jurisdictions have definitions for assault , and none have physical contact as  part of that definition . 

 assault can be as simple as a verbal confrontation ( at least where I live that's the way it is due to the way the laws are written), the physical part would be under "battery" , the physically touching of another person.

 And a lot of people confuse the two different terms.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.27  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.16    8 years ago

Deleted

Direct & derogatory

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.28  JohnRussell  replied to  96WS6 @5.1.17    8 years ago
After all the hysterical posts and posts advocating violence

Show the post where I advocated violence or be quiet. 

 
 
 
JaneDoe
Sophomore Silent
5.1.30  JaneDoe  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @5.1.26    8 years ago

I was doing a little googling into that. I found this.

From the link. Simply poking someone in the chest with your finger can be considered assault. 

 I’m also trying to find out if the charges could be worse because there was a minor involved.

Maybe I will look around a little more later.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1.31  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.24    8 years ago
a likely drunk lone asshole doing what he does best, being an asshole.

Would you continue to make excuses for him if it had been your kid?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.32  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XDm9mm @5.1.25    8 years ago
Texas Penal Code Chapter 31, Jimenez is facing a felony charge due to his action of snatching the hat directly off the head of the 16-year-old.

Here is an excerpt from that penal code you linked:

(e) Except as provided by Subsection (f), an offense under this section is:

(1) a Class C misdemeanor if the value of the property stolen is less than $100 ;

(2) a Class B misdemeanor if:

(A) the value of the property stolen is $100 or more but less than $750;

(B) the value of the property stolen is less than $100 and the defendant has previously been convicted of any grade of theft; or

(C) the property stolen is a driver's license, commercial driver's license, or personal identification certificate issued by this state or another state;

(3) a Class A misdemeanor if the value of the property stolen is $750 or more but less than $2,500;

(4) a state jail felony if:

(A) the value of the property stolen is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000, or the property is less than 10 head of sheep, swine, or goats or any part thereof under the value of $30,000.

Even though the headline claimed he had been "charged" I found nothing in the article to confirm he was "charged" with a felony for theft. If he was it will be pretty hard to claim the hat was worth more than $2,500 making it a felony. This is getting stupid, all the right wing faux outrage is getting tiresome on this non-scandal.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.1.35  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.33    8 years ago
Because a liberal adult stealing from and and throwing things on a conservative minor is such a non issue.

There is zero evidence this idiot is a "liberal". There are plenty of Republicans who can't stand this douche-nozzle of a President. And yes, it's a non-issue, the kid got a wet face and temporarily lost his dunce cap, boo hoo. Talk about whiny snowflakes, the conservatives truly define it these days.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1.36  author  96WS6  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1.18    8 years ago
it's an adult punk

I think they are numb to these sort of things.  Also, given the consideration that some liberals seem to want to extend adolescence (stay on your parents health care until you are 26) I am sure they would debate if he is actually and "adult" at all.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
5.1.37  Ender  replied to  96WS6 @5.1.36    8 years ago
given the consideration that some liberals seem to want to extend adolescence (stay on your parents health care until you are 26)

Talk about twisting things. So you think it is wrong if people want to keep their children on their policy while they are going to college? You know, while they are still going to classes and can't afford it n their own.

I guess throwing them out to the wolves would be a better option, according to some.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1.39  author  96WS6  replied to  Ender @5.1.37    8 years ago

I don't have a problem with people that want to have their kids covered on their health insurance forever, I just have a problem helping them pay for it.  By the time I was 26 I had worked my way though school had started my career and bought my first home and I was off dad's insurance at 18 like everyone else.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.1.40  author  96WS6  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.11    8 years ago

You have no argument 96W. I never said I supported violence. I don't. 

If people want to embarrass """***Trump Supporters***""" in public that is up to them. I would probably only do it to a select few of trump officials, not some kid in a fast food restaurant. 

You say I have no argument then immediately admit you would harass "a select few Trump officials"   You are still WAY IN THE WRONG John.  Harassing political opponents is NEVER OK.   I think you should seriously consider taking a break from politics for a while,  it is starting to negativity affect your judgement.  SAY NO TO MADMAX!

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
5.1.41  sixpick  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.10    8 years ago
And Trump isn't able to control his emotions because.............?

Now that is funny because Trump is very capable of controlling his emotions and the emotions of those who hate him and aren't getting their way.  Only they have regressed to a more barbaric state than they once were....

Democrats protesting on House Floor.jpg

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.43  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1.27    8 years ago
Texan, you obviously have nothing pertinent to say , so to lessen your chances of being seen as a troll, why dont you just comment more sparingly?

Pot=kettle...which one are you?

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
5.1.44  Spikegary  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.2    8 years ago

It's called being off topic while trying to divert attention form the actions of those of his own ilk.  Sadly, only the author can flag as off-topic.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
5.1.45  Spikegary  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @5.1.21    8 years ago

Throwing a soda with ice in someone's face is in fact an assault.  Much as you try to make it seem like it was just some kind of misunderstanding solved in a gentlemanly manner.

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
5.1.46  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.2    8 years ago

I wonder if Trump will offer to pay this guy's legal fees?

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
5.1.49  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.48    8 years ago
Why don't you call him up and ask?

Maybe what the manager really should have done is encouraged all the employees and other patrons of the restaurant to beat up the Trump supporter and kick him out of the restaurant.    In other words do exactly what Trump suggested his supporters should do to black protesters at his rallies.

However I do wonder what's going through the mind of a teenage Trump supporter, if anything.

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
5.1.51  Skrekk  replied to  Texan1211 @5.1.50    8 years ago
yeah, a manager should encourage lawbreaking and assault from his staff, and endanger his own livelihood in the process. That sounds REAL smart.

If it works for a presidential candidate like Trump why can't it work for a lowly restaurant manager?    Or are you saying that our judicial system has a double standard which clearly advantages white perps and sociopathic white supremacists?

In any event I can understand why a racial minority wouldn't be favorably impressed by a kid promoting a white supremacist traitor.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
5.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @5    8 years ago
And Donald Trump, asshole of assholes, is largely , no, predominantly, to blame.

No, he is not to blame for this nonsense, not at all.   Any dipshit like this ass-hat, who act out in an uncivil manner, are 100% to blame for their own actions.

Time for some personal responsibility John.   You remember what that is?   Have you ever truly grasped the concept when it comes to your narrative?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.4  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.3    8 years ago

...says the chief of the offensive word police. Cult!

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
5.2.5  lennylynx  replied to  devangelical @5.2.4    8 years ago

"Cult!"

stunned  OHMYGODOHMYGOD!!! 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
5.2.7  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to    8 years ago

It's not up for debate. Next time gets a violation. 

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
5.2.8  author  96WS6  replied to    8 years ago

IKR?  I got a skirting violation for giving you crap about posting the poll.  LOL!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.9  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.6    8 years ago

I'm pretty sure teavangelicals don't have the letter Q on their keyboards.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.4  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5    8 years ago
Donald Trump's speech last night at a Montana rally was ridiculous, embarrassing, idiotic, offensive and beneath the dignity of his office.

I can't stand to watch his speeches. Why do you inflict them upon yourself.  And he speaks the truth...don't you care for the truth? Would you have him lie?  Not Impressed
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @5.4    8 years ago

The pace of trump's lying is picking up. 

Trump is making more false claims

The pace is picking up.  Daniel Dale of the Toronto Star does a great job of tracking Trump.

Before this month, Trump had never made more than 60 false claims in a week. In the last two weeks, he's made 103 and 100. Here's the chart showing how exceptional these weeks have been: pic.twitter.com/aPY7L26ApS

— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) July 6, 2018

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.5  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @5    8 years ago

Is it more in keeping with the "dignity" of the office, is it more "presidential" to fly to California 4 or 5 times a year so you can host dinners at $40,000 a plate ? 

I prefer Trump's path of getting regular people involved to Obama's scheme of having Uber-rich leftists buying influence. Thanks!

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6  Hal A. Lujah    8 years ago

At 2am in a burger joint, it isn't surprising when someone gets a drink tossed in their face just for wearing the wrong NFL jersey.  Context matters.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
6.2  author  96WS6  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    8 years ago

Translation:  It's OK, because I agree with the attacker.Winking 2     Once again Liberal hypocrisy is unwittingly displayed.  What a surprise.

How's the grand kid Hal?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.2.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  96WS6 @6.2    8 years ago

Your translation skills suck ass.  Grandson is doing well, thanks.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
6.2.2  author  96WS6  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.2.1    8 years ago
Grandson is doing well, thanks.

How about that.  Prayer does work.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.2.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  96WS6 @6.2.2    8 years ago

Lol.  Surgeons work.  Prayer pretends.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
6.2.4  author  96WS6  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.2.3    8 years ago

Doctors are just doctors.  I had a half dozen tell me and my wife we would never have kids and they all said there was no way any of them could help us.  Impossible they said.    7 years later we had our first.   Impossible they said, again, after she was pregnent.   We now have 2.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.2.5  MrFrost  replied to  96WS6 @6.2.2    8 years ago
Prayer does work.

Prove it. Even the bible says that prayer without action is useless. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
6.2.6  Sparty On  replied to  96WS6 @6.2.2    8 years ago
Prayer does work.

[deleted]

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
6.2.9  author  96WS6  replied to  MrFrost @6.2.5    8 years ago

Just trying to have a civil conversation.  Not going to get into a debate about religion so sorry, no bigoted bashing of Christianity today.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.2.10  MrFrost  replied to    8 years ago

James 2:14-26

 

Faith Without Works Is Dead

14  What   does it   profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him?   15  If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food,   16  and   one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what   does it   profit?   17  Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.

18  But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.”   Show me your faith without   [ a ] your works,   and I will show you my faith by   [ b ] my works.   19  You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble!   20  But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is   [ c ] dead?   21  Was not Abraham our father justified by works   when he offered Isaac his son on the altar?   22  Do you see   that faith was working together with his works, and by   works faith was made   [ d ] perfect?   23  And the Scripture was fulfilled which says,   “Abraham believed God, and it was   [ e ] accounted to him for righteousness.”   And he was called   the friend of God.   24  You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.

25  Likewise,   was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent   them   out another way?

26  For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.2.11  MrFrost  replied to    8 years ago

There is obvious ambiguity there. Such is the nature of the bible...

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6.2.13  MrFrost  replied to    8 years ago

Fair enough.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
6.2.14  sixpick  replied to  MrFrost @6.2.5    8 years ago
Prayer does work.

Prove it. Even the bible says that prayer without action is useless.

You don't think he just prayed, do you?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    8 years ago

Blame the victim, huh? Typical response.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.3.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @6.3    8 years ago

You get the prize for the most idiotic post in this thread.  deleted

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.3.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.3.1    8 years ago

Is this best you can do in the way of responses. Nothing stupid about it, you blamed the victim and seem to support the the perp. Now that's stupid.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.3.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @6.3.2    8 years ago

Quote me where I blamed anyone.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.4  Tacos!  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    8 years ago
At 2am in a burger joint, it isn't surprising when someone gets a drink tossed in their face

So the victim is to blame for being out that late? Wow. Face Palm  I know some rape victims you should talk to.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
6.4.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Tacos! @6.4    8 years ago

Oh look - another person who can't read.  This place if full of them.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
6.4.2  sixpick  replied to  Tacos! @6.4    8 years ago
So the victim is to blame for being out that late?

That's only true if the victim is not of the preferred Party.  Gender, race and anything else doesn't matter.

Maybe we as Conservatives should push for calling some of these vicious acts against us which are appearing to be more common "Hate Crimes".

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
6.4.4  Spikegary  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6.4.1    8 years ago

If everyone misunderstands your writings, maybe it's time to improve your writing skills.....but, I unbderstand the thought process of 'I'm never wrong, everyone else is'.  Been seeing it here for a few years now.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
6.6  Spikegary  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @6    8 years ago

Wasn't 2 a.m., home slice, that's when the asshole was arrested.........try to keep up.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
8  nightwalker    8 years ago

Free speech has consequences even when you're a trump supporter, I guess. I'll wait until someone else other then fux carries this story and until someone does it's just another STORY about poor abused ultra-conservatives written by ultra-conservatives.

Again.

Makes No Sense

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
8.3  Sparty On  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago

Damn!   Can't be inconvenienced to do one simple google search eh?   I did and this popped right up, first page.

Newsweek

You shouldn't be waiting for the bulk of the mass media to be reporting this, you should be wondering why they aren't.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
8.3.2  MrFrost  replied to    8 years ago

Just so you know...I am stealing that picture.. LOL

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
8.3.4  sixpick  replied to  Sparty On @8.3    8 years ago
You shouldn't be waiting for the bulk of the mass media to be reporting this, you should be wondering why they aren't.

That is the real truth of the matter.  The MSM has one objective and we all know what it is.  Whether they don't report something or do report something or twist the story around, they have one objective and that is to perpetuate racial division and after reading around 100 of the so-called Russian tweets, Instagram post and Facebook comments the Democrats made available online, I concluded that was the only objective of the so-called Russian interference.  And they didn't appear to favor either candidate when you put them all together.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
8.6  Rmando  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago

So your attitude is, "If it's only on Fox then it didn't happen"? Is that the same philosophy about if a tree falls and no one hears it then it doesn't make a sound?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.6.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Rmando @8.6    8 years ago
Is that the same philosophy about if a tree falls and no one hears it then it doesn't make a sound?

Only to the bear shitting there! Sorry!  Giggle

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
8.6.2  nightwalker  replied to  Rmando @8.6    8 years ago

If a story goes out on CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, the AP or even the BBC among others, or ALL of them, I find it easier to believe.

I lost what little respect I had for fux while Hannity was drooling over the Bundys and they got deadly serious in their trump butt kissing. Half trump's blow ups are from something he picked up off fux. I also found them repetitive, but they have to repeat their catch-phrases and buzz-words because it's from Stalin's cold war brainwashing technics. There's also how within 10 mins of any mass shooting, before the police reports are released, fux know he was a liberal, his parents were socialists an his grandparents were straight communists before the shooter's name is ever released.

Fux just doesn't impress me. Among some other news sites.

 
 
 
JaneDoe
Sophomore Silent
8.7  JaneDoe  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago
Free speech has consequences even when you're a trump supporter, I guess.

A 16 year old boy out with friends was assaulted by a 30 year old bully over a hat.  Do you think that is ok?

 
 
 
JaneDoe
Sophomore Silent
8.7.2  JaneDoe  replied to  Texan1211 @8.7.1    8 years ago
Are we really going to take seriously anyone who can't do a two-second search on Google?

 I stopped taking a lot of people on here seriously. Some are just out trolling, trying to agitate.

Besides,  anyone trying to condone a 30 year old ripping a hat off of a teenager, who isn't even old enough to vote and throwing a drink in his face because they don't like a piece of his attire, has more serious issues to deal with.

Makes you wonder how they would honestly feel if it happened to one of their children.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.8  Greg Jones  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago

It's all over the news and YouTube. Apparently a lot of people don't like kids being criminally assaulted.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.9  Greg Jones  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago
Free speech has consequences even when you're a trump supporter, I guess.

So if I saw one of Hillary's supporters wearing one of those pussy hats, it's OK to to go steal it and throw her Scotch in her face?

Gotcha'!

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
8.9.2  Sparty On  replied to    8 years ago

Lol ...... or Champipple

 
 
 
MRZ
Freshman Silent
8.9.3  MRZ  replied to  Greg Jones @8.9    8 years ago

and throw her Scotch in her face

Alcohol abuse is what you got there....

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
8.9.4  Spikegary  replied to    8 years ago

Why waste good scotch?  Use a shot from the Well bottle.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
8.9.5  nightwalker  replied to  Greg Jones @8.9    8 years ago

ROFL

Go ahead and try it, but I'm betting there would be other people around to grab you and sit on you for the police.

(don't do it.)

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
8.9.6  nightwalker  replied to  Greg Jones @8.9    8 years ago

You go to a lot of bars where people are wearing pussyhats, do you?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
8.9.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to    8 years ago
Clinton told voters last year that her go-to beverage is the vodka martini, a simple cocktail of vodka (40 percent ABV) and vermouth (18 percent ABV) that is served chilled to take the bite off all the alcohol in it.  Trump supporters lean towards cheap beer and body shots.
 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
8.9.8  Spikegary  replied to  nightwalker @8.9.6    8 years ago

No the bars I frequent are only open to adults.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8.10  Tacos!  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago
Free speech has consequences even when you're a trump supporter, I guess.

Because having a different political view warrants a battery. Face Palm  

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
8.10.2  nightwalker  replied to  XXJefferson51 @8.10.1    8 years ago

A fine sophisticated "PFFFFTTTTT!" to both of you, now you're trying to change what I said into what you want it to be.

BAAADDDDD. (now who was that quote from?)

Laugh

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
8.11  Spikegary  replied to  nightwalker @8    8 years ago

Free Speech allows another person to commit a felony against you?  Really?  That's one of the stupidest things I have ever heard.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
8.11.1  nightwalker  replied to  Spikegary @8.11    8 years ago

Does it? Appears so, since stealing a HAT is a felony. Too bad the guy wasn't bright enough to also grab the CELLPHONE that was sticking in his face and just walk off with the evidence.

But as much as you'd like it to, I don't think this idiot will be charged with a felony or serve any time.

I DON'T think what he did was right, I'm just a little skeptical.

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
9  Rmando    8 years ago

When I saw the still shot from the video I though the guy was a slimmed down Seth Rogan. I had to ask myself, "Why was he eating at a Whataburger in Texas?"

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
10  MrFrost    8 years ago

The guy is a jackass for stealing the hat. I am not a fan of trump, but wrong is wrong. 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
10.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  MrFrost @10    8 years ago

personally I think the guy is a jackass for being a supposed adult instigating a confrontation with a 16 year old minor.

 
 
 
nightwalker
Sophomore Silent
10.2.3  nightwalker  replied to    8 years ago

WELL, if I'd a been there, I'd have grabbed the guy by the throat, slammed him 2" into a brick wall, judo-thrown him to the floor, break both his collarbones with karate chops then jump 8' into the air and land with both feet on his nuts, and mash them to pulp while making my best Bruce Lee emotion face. GRRRRR!!! GR!

LOL

Calm down, you weren't there and who knows what would have happened if you were.

Try some yoga, practice saying "OHMMMMMM" and clear your mind.  

J/K with ya, no offense.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
10.2.4  Spikegary  replied to  nightwalker @10.2.3    8 years ago

Okay, Super Mario.  Those power coins and fruits have gone to your head.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
12  Paula Bartholomew    8 years ago

I was stationed in San Antonio seven times.  Hell, you can get the shit beat out of you there if any hat you wear isn't a cowboy hat.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
12.1  Sparty On  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @12    8 years ago

See lots of HS sophomores get beat up by 30 year old men did you?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
12.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sparty On @12.1    8 years ago

It was humor.  Lighten up Francis.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
12.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @12.1.1    8 years ago

Sure it was Sgt Hulka .... I thought you were blown up ....

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
12.1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sparty On @12.1.2    8 years ago

I love his character.  He is like a combination of almost every DS's/NCO's I had when in the Army.  I think everyone has had a SGT Hulka with the big toe in their lives at one time.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
12.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @12.1.3    8 years ago

They do make a lasting impression.   I have yet to meet a Vet who DOESN'T remember the names of their DI's.   Heck i have friends who still remember the serial number of the weapon they were issued in boot.  

Thats crazy ..... i couldn't forget stuff like that fast enough when i was done.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
12.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sparty On @12.1.4    8 years ago

I did 23 years Army and it is funny of some of the silly insignificant stuff I can still remember.  Thank you for your service.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
12.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @12.1.5    8 years ago

Thx and thank you as well.   23 years, wow!   Good for you.  

I always have a little bit more respect for Vets who did time like that and/or retired out of the military.   You deserved it over us one hitchers IMHO.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
12.1.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sparty On @12.1.6    8 years ago

If not for you "one hitchers", our military would not be as well trained and as powerful as it is now.  Never sell yourself short regarding your service.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
12.1.8  Sparty On  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @12.1.7    8 years ago

I don't but serving 23 years vs 4 is deserving of more respect and gratitude IMO.   Being proud of my service doesn't change that one iota for me so thanks again!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
12.1.9  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sparty On @12.1.8    8 years ago

Rooooo Ahhhhhhh!!!!!

 
 
 
Marshall James
Freshman Silent
13  Marshall James    8 years ago

Just another example of how when you have limited intelligence, you will resort to violence to make your point.  Any thinking person would of had a civil discussion with the teen.  Of course this is a left wing mindless statist, so there is no critical thought process going on.  Things are getting lively.  It really blows my mind that the left is so upset with Trump and think he is the anti Christ.  Guess they were asleep for the 8 years prior to him.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
13.1  Spikegary  replied to  Marshall James @13    8 years ago

Any real thinking person, at 2 in the morning, would just go about their own business, get their burger or whatever and leave.  At what point does anything like this even become remotely acceptable?  Never is the right answer.

 
 

Who is online






120 visitors