╌>

Coulter blasts Trump over shutdown deal: 'Biggest wimp ever to serve as president'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  krishna  •  7 years ago  •  236 comments

Coulter blasts Trump over shutdown deal: 'Biggest wimp ever to serve as president'
Coulter has long been thought of as someone Trump looks to as a gauge of public support amongst his conservative base.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



512

Ann Coulter

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter ripped  President Trump  over the news that he has agreed to end the government shutdown by accepting a temporary funding bill without money for his border wall, saying that Trump is now a bigger wimp than former President George H.W. Bush.

Good news for George Herbert Walker Bush: As of today, he is no longer the biggest wimp ever to serve as President of the United States.

Coulter has long been thought of as someone Trump looks to as a gauge of public support amongst his conservative base. She said last month — right before the shutdown began —that she would not vote for Trump again in 2020 without a border wall.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Krishna    7 years ago

Coulter has long been thought of as someone Trump looks to as a gauge of public support amongst his conservative base.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Krishna @1    7 years ago

Ann Coulter is a loud mouthed idiot who I have never cared for. If people would read what Trump stated, they would realize that he did not really "cave" and the only thing Pelosi got was a temporary end to the shutdown to allow for more discussion on border security.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
1.2.1  SteevieGee  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2    7 years ago
the only thing Pelosi got was a temporary end to the shutdown to allow for more discussion on border security.

So...  Pelosi got exactly what she asked for then?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2  seeder  Krishna    7 years ago

She said last month — right before the shutdown began —that she would not vote for Trump again in 2020 without a border wall.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Krishna @2    7 years ago

I'll bet she gets the chance.

3 weeks... Big deal.

A vacation from the shutdown pain. A pressure relief for the office of the president. 

More pressure forced onto congress. Probably an overseas trip in the making as well.

it's not over, it's an optical break time and behind the scene deal makin time. 

WAaaa I wanta Wall ! WAaa I get what want ! One way or another ! 

It's not over. 2020 is a ways away...

PS:  I respect your enthusiasm, I think it's just a bit premature. Sorry

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3  Thrawn 31    7 years ago

Lol I am loving this! Let his punk ass back out AGAIN! That would be even more hilarious.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.1  epistte  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3    7 years ago
Lol I am loving this! Let his punk ass back out AGAIN! That would be even more hilarious.

It's almost 50/50 at this point. We'll have to wait and see what Sean Hannity says for the final odds of a 2:00 Tweet that Trump changed his mind. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  epistte @3.1    7 years ago

Honestly, it doesn't matter what he does at this point, he is a pussy. Everyone, even his supporters can see it. He is a bitch and will tuck tail and run anytime he isn't certain the deck is stacked in his favor. 

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
3.1.2  epistte  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3.1.1    7 years ago
Honestly, it doesn't matter what he does at this point, he is a pussy. Everyone, even his supporters can see it. He is a bitch and will tuck tail and run anytime he isn't certain the deck is stacked in his favor. 

If he does back out of it it will be most amusing to watch Mitch McConnell try to defend him.  Sarah Sanders could give herself whiplash and she'd still blame it on the lying liberal media.  I wonder if Sean Spicer enjoys her performance art from the sidelines?

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
3.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  epistte @3.1.2    7 years ago

Look, I am not advocating for murder...

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
3.1.4  seeder  Krishna  replied to  epistte @3.1    7 years ago

It's almost 50/50 at this point. We'll have to wait and see what Sean Hannity says for the final odds of a 2:00 Tweet that Trump changed his mind. 

I've had similar thoughts-- nothing he says can believed until time goes on . . .

(And until his puppet masters-- Hannity, Limbaugh, and Putin) give him updated instructions...

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.5  katrix  replied to  Thrawn 31 @3.1.1    7 years ago
He is a bitch and will tuck tail and run anytime he isn't certain the deck is stacked in his favor. 

He's done that his entire life.  He's all show and no go.  His bloviating bluster would be hilarious if it weren't making our country the laughingstock of the world, and harming our fellow citizens.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
4  Thrawn 31    7 years ago

Trump is such a fucking idiot. He put himself in a corner that he couldn't get out of, pretended the entire time that "I got this shit" when the entire world outside of his base knew he didn't, and then caved hardcore. Lol my god, has there ever been a bigger retard placed in a position of power? 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
5  lady in black    7 years ago

How very nice of this shrew wanting the shutdown to continue and hold 800,000 of her fellow Americans hostage over a vanity wall.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6  Thrawn 31    7 years ago

Trump supporters are very quiet all of a sudden...

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.1  epistte  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6    7 years ago
Trump supporters are very quiet all of a sudden...

They haven't been issued their Friday spin. That will happen between 8 and 9:00 pm. 

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
6.2  livefreeordie  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6    7 years ago

Tax season has started.  My days are filled.   

But I will wait and see if he gets funding for the Wall by Feb 15th. If none and he doesn’t declare a national emergency I will be very disappointed.

i would rather have seen the shutdown continue 

[deleted]

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.1  lady in black  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2    7 years ago

Trump's vanity wall will not be funded...other border security will.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.2.2  epistte  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2    7 years ago
But I will wait and see if he gets funding for the Wall by Feb 15th. If none and he doesn’t declare a national emergency I will be very disappointed.

The federal courts would immediately set aside his claim of a national emergency because of the funding for a border wall. 

all this has demonstrated that the Democrats are enemies of this nation.

That is only your opinion.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.2.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2    7 years ago
But I will wait and see if he gets funding for the Wall by Feb 15th.

He won't.

If none and he doesn’t declare a national emergency I will be very disappointed.

Even if he declares one it doesn't matter. The executive will be sued immediately by numerous parties and even if the SCOTUS rules in dip shit's favor he will probably be dead and his dream will be long forgotten.

i would rather have seen the shutdown continue 

Of course, because it doesn't directly effect you and you are an asshole.

all this has demonstrated that the Democrats are enemies of this nation.

Or that Trump has no clue what he is doing and most people don't like him.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
6.2.4  livefreeordie  replied to  lady in black @6.2.1    7 years ago

Then we have a crisis that could produce a civil war. Every Trump supporter I know is demanding the Wall.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.2.5  epistte  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago
Then we have a crisis that could produce a civil war. Every Trump supporter I know is demanding the Wall.

LOL. Going to start a civil war over a wall that isn't effective and most people do not support is hilarious.  Maybe you should get Mexico or one of the Russian oligarchs to pay for it.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
6.2.6  livefreeordie  replied to  epistte @6.2.2    7 years ago

Then it will go to SCOTUS and they would have to ignore the Constitution to stop it

This is not just my opinion but that of most conservative Americans.  I don’t think you leftists understand how angry we are about what we consider the treasonous ideology of the Democrats

explore social media and you can easily confirm this

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
6.2.7  livefreeordie  replied to  epistte @6.2.5    7 years ago

The people who elected him demand it.  Remember Obama and “elections have consequences”?

we demand the wall and more security options on the border

Alexander Hamilton Federalist 28

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual State. In a single State, if the persons entrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.2.8  epistte  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.6    7 years ago
Then it will go to SCOTUS and they would have to ignore the Constitution to stop it

This is not just my opinion but that of most conservative Americans.  I don’t think you leftists understand how angry we are about what we consider the treasonous ideology of the Democrats

explore social media and you can easily confirm this

The failure a POTUS to achieve a partisan legislative goal does not rise to the level of a national emergency.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
6.2.9  livefreeordie  replied to  epistte @6.2.8    7 years ago

That’s not what I said. The Democrats will not agree to anything that gives Trump a political victory, even if it means the destruction of our country.

Our borders remain out of control and the Democrats only offering is to continue catch and release, filling our country with illegal invaders

For Trump haters and other critics who claim that there is no border crisis because supposedly illegal crossings are at historic lows

Let’s assume your argument and pursue that logic. Given the low figure of 30,000 per month and that Border Patrol data shows they apprehend 50%:

That means EVERY DAY, 7 DAYS a WEEK we have 2000 illegals entering this country, with 1000 living here. 7000 a week, 364,000 a year getting free education, free healthcare paid for by taxpayers

If only 2% are criminals that is 14 criminals a week, 728 criminals a year entering our country

And we’re supposed to believe that is not a crisis for our country?  That kind of thinking is either insane, naive, or diabolical

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.2.10  epistte  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.7    7 years ago
The people who elected him demand it.  Remember Obama and “elections have consequences”?

That would be the 2018 midterms. They also have consequences.

There is no border emergency outside of the conservative echo chamber. 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.11  lady in black  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

Oh please, no one is going to start a fucking war over this shit.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.2.12  Thrawn 31  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

And they are the large minority. 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.13  lady in black  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.9    7 years ago

Why wasn't it a crisis the last 2 years when the republicans held all 3 branches....more bullshit excuses 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.14  lady in black  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.7    7 years ago

Trump having such a low approval rating, you are in the minority.  The majority of Americans will NOT go to war over his vanity wall.  

Plus he REPEATEDLY stated Mexico will pay for the wall.   Here are HIS words, over and over again:

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.15  lady in black  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

You and your fellow trump supporters are in the minority, so deal with the fact that there will be NO wall funding

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.2.16  Thrawn 31  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.9    7 years ago
The Democrats will not agree to anything that gives Trump a political victory, even if it means the destruction of our country.

Yawn, after 2010-2016 do you really expect any of us to give a shit?

Our borders remain out of control

Seem fine down here.

and the Democrats only offering is to continue catch and release, filling our country with illegal invaders

Really, and what is that legislation?

That means EVERY DAY, 7 DAYS a WEEK we have 2000 illegals entering this country, with 1000 living here. 7000 a week, 364,000 a year getting free education, free healthcare paid for by taxpayers

[Deleted]

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.17  lady in black  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.6    7 years ago

Enough with you bullshit threats. 

BTW Trump already owns the next shut down because during his speech, he told us he would shut the government down again if he is not treated "fairly."  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.18  JohnRussell  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.9    7 years ago

LiveFreeOrDie, I don't want to bum you out, but there will be no wall. It will not even get as far as Trump declaring an emergency and that going to court.

The new "agreement" that will last until Feb 15 requires that a committee be set up with negotiators from both the House and Congress that will produce a "compromise" agreement on border security.

Now, after the last 5 or 6 weeks of government shutdown and all the criticism, what do you think the chances are that this congressional committee WILL produce a compromise plan for border security? 100% ? 1000% ?    They will create a bill that everyone in Congress, or the great majority, can agree with, if for no other reason than to avoid another shutdown.  When that happens, do you really think Trump will say "I dont care what compromise you reached, this is not a wall and I am declaring an emergency" . 

That is not going to happen. Part of the compromise will be that things will be phrased in a way that Trump will be able to say he got what he wanted. Maybe a small section of wall and a mauch larger section of the border secured by drones or other technology.  Trump will take that little sliver of wall and say he won.

A Congressional compromise will not include a full blown wall and Trump wont have the political option of declaring emergency.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
6.2.19  pat wilson  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

This country has been in crisis since trump was elected. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.2.20  seeder  Krishna  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago
Every Trump supporter I know is demanding the Wall.

But at this point-- what percentage of the population are Trump supporters? 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
6.2.21  Kavika   replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

Not with the civil war again...Geez, when are you going to figure out that no one with half a brain is going to kill other American citizens over a wall. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.2.22  seeder  Krishna  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2    7 years ago
But I will wait and see if he gets funding for the Wall by Feb 15th

Do you actually believe there's even a slight chance the Democratic majority in the House will vote to fund Trump's s border wall?

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.2.24  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.23    7 years ago
What difference does that make?

A pretty fucking big one considering just a few tens of thousands of people in a few areas liked Hillary less than they like fat ass and that decided the election. If fat ass makes a few tens of thousands of those people not like him and he isn't going up against someone as hated as he is, well then....

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.2.26  Thrawn 31  replied to    7 years ago
There really needs to be physical barriers at the border to help to secure it.

Depends, how "secure" are we talking? 

To think otherwise is foolish

No it isn't.

Trump isn't concerned about vanity in the slightest.

Are you fucking serious? [deleted]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
6.2.28  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to    7 years ago

Wally,

There has not been a wall built anywhere that has not been breached one way or another. Do you know what Gengas Kahn said when he saw the Great Wall of China (which was supposed to keep him out).. and I paraphrase here" I would like to thank the Chinese for their invitation with the wall. He then invaded. 

Even with the barriers, we have up now, there countless tunnels. It will just become a new business for the coyotes. Now I am all for some sort of barrier, maybe an electrified fence with Razer wire, and more border control, but the concept of a wall is a waste of money and will not stop those who want to come in if that is what they really want to do.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6.2.29  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.27    7 years ago
Well, gee, if we are to use that rather dubious logic

It isn't dubious at all, it was something like 70,000 votes in 3 states that got him the presidency. He lost the popular vote by millions.

then the PPACA should have never been passed, seeing as how a majority of Americans were against it, right?

Was that up for an election and decided by the EC? [deleted] God I try to respect you sometimes but you make it so hard. 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
6.2.30  pat wilson  replied to    7 years ago
Trump isn't concerned about vanity in the slightest.

aaaahhhhhaaaaahhhhaaaahhhh (wait, catching my breath) aaaahhhaaahhhaaahhhaaahhaaaahhhaa !!!!!!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
6.2.31  Kavika   replied to  pat wilson @6.2.30    7 years ago

before-you-judge-trump-walk-a-milein-his-shoes-you-24523808.png

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.2.32  epistte  replied to  pat wilson @6.2.30    7 years ago
aaaahhhhhaaaaahhhhaaaahhhh (wait, catching my breath) aaaahhhaaahhhaaahhhaaahhaaaahhhaa !!!!!!

That's why he dyes his face orange and has a dead weasel stapled to his head.........

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.2.34  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to    7 years ago
trump isn't concerned about vanity

IMO: trump produces his own "vanity" protection.

IMO: He thinks..No, knows "I  have a good brain, I do no wrong and anyone who believes other wise is wrong.

Personally I think he over rates himself a little.  

(to say the least)

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
6.2.35  Dulay  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.6    7 years ago
explore social media and you can easily confirm this

What ARE the Russians telling y'all to do nowadays? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
6.2.37  Dulay  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.7    7 years ago

Will you never tire of quoting that dated treatise? You don't seem to know what Hamilton was actually talking about. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
6.2.38  Dulay  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @6.2.28    7 years ago

It stretches credulity to think that someone who has walked from Central America will be stopped by a wall. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
6.2.39  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to    7 years ago

Wally, 

I gave a few options in my first post to you. There are other high tech ways, but an electric fence with drones and more border guards would be a better solution. The guards could keep an eye out for digging as well as people getting around. 

That is how the coast guard does it. They actually get more people every year that come by water than actually come across the border by foot or auto. They also stop more drugs then any patrol does now. Last year the coast guard stopped a record load in one boat. 

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
6.2.40  epistte  replied to    7 years ago
So what's the practical, common sense solution. Surely you don't want an open border with illegals pouring over by the hundreds. We simply don't have the resources and facilities, particularly in those border states, to deal with this immigrant invasion.

There is no immigrant invasion.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
6.2.41  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.9    7 years ago
The Democrats will not agree to anything that gives Trump a political victory,

I agree the dems certainly dont want to. I'm hesitant as well. Give a bully an inch he'll take a mile.

Sometimes I think this man's own ways and means of accomplishment are getting in his way.

such as, WTF is so wrong with calling a fence a fence. (Tip of the iceberg)

America was set up to be more than a one man show, trump would be wise to understand that better I believe.  wall...LOL 

The dems have been approving fencing for years hell even his Border Patrol people say Fence.

Wall...lol 

Kinda of childish to get hung up on a word IMO: But That seems to be part of the case, for some on both sides. 

childish !

Too bad trump didn't just say we'e going to work on finishing the border fence in the beginning. 

Nope a great big beautiful Wall. A monumental wall. A trump Wall.

Not gonna happen we build fences here. not walls.  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
6.2.42  Studiusbagus  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @6.2.39    7 years ago
I gave a few options in my first post to you

And you actually think he read them?

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.43  lady in black  replied to    7 years ago

I guess you haven't been paying attention, it will not include billions for his vanity wall, and he is ALL about vanity.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.2.44  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.23    7 years ago

Actually, I think they do...jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
6.2.46  katrix  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

You're advocating treason if you want a civil war over this.  It's a shame you aren't patriotic.

People like you should go move to countries where dictators and sharia law are acceptable. 

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
6.2.47  katrix  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.6    7 years ago
explore social media and you can easily confirm this

Sorry, I don't read what Russians post. 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
6.2.48  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.27    7 years ago
Well, gee, if we are to use that rather dubious logic, then the PPACA should have never been passed, seeing as how a majority of Americans were against it, right?

Tex, if you didn't already exist I'd want to create you for the purpose of knocking down your ridiculous and ever false claims.  While it is true that in the beginning the PPACA was underwater in the polls, soon after it became fully implemented that began to change rapidly--so much so that  more the 60 attempts to abolish it by Republicans with majorities in both house between 2014 and now have failed.  Here's a snapshot of one tracking poll (Kaiser Family Foundation) just since Scumbag came into office:

512

I also ran across this recent poll giving the sample a choice of single-payer vs. "current system" which, for the purposes of this polls was designated as the PPACA:

512

What's most striking about those numbers is that 85% of this sample want something other than the health care access mess that is the pure private corporate disaster we now have. 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
6.2.49  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2    7 years ago
i would rather have seen the shutdown continue

Unless you only do the taxes for fellow trumpsters, I don't think your clients are going to be to happy about indeterminate delays in getting their tax refunds.  But I'm not even sure trumpsters would be willing to go along happily with that considering their aversion to having to pay any tax at all. 

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
6.2.50  SteevieGee  replied to    7 years ago

How about having serious penalties for hiring them?  As long as employers get a pass they will take advantage of the situation.  Make E-verify mandatory.  If a company owner or CEO can end up in prison maybe he'll make sure his workers are legal.  No jobs = no illegal immigration.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
6.2.51  lady in black  replied to  SteevieGee @6.2.50    7 years ago

Trump’s golf course employed undocumented workers — and then fired them amid showdown over border wall

They had spent years on the staff of Donald Trump’s golf club, winning employee-of-the-month awards and receiving glowing letters of recommendation.

Some were trusted enough to hold the keys to Eric Trump’s weekend home. They were experienced enough to know that when Donald Trump ordered chicken wings they were to serve him two orders on one plate.

But on Jan. 18, about a dozen employees at Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, N.Y., were summoned, one by one, to talk with a human resources executive from Trump headquarters.

During the meetings, they were fired because they are undocumented immigrants, according to interviews with the workers and their attorney. The fired workers are from Latin America.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/donald-trumps-demand-for-a-border-wall-shut-down-the-government-at-the-same-time-his-company-was-firing-undocumented-workers/2019/01/26/8cf75d66-20c5-11e9-8e21-59a09ff1e2a1_story.html?utm_term=.6524d9982326

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
6.2.52  Nowhere Man  replied to  SteevieGee @6.2.50    7 years ago
How about having serious penalties for hiring them?  As long as employers get a pass they will take advantage of the situation.  Make E-verify mandatory.  If a company owner or CEO can end up in prison maybe he'll make sure his workers are legal.  No jobs = no illegal immigration.

Reagan tried that back in '86, it was the basis for his giving in on Amnesty. Unfortunately, congress, (the House specifically) has never had the cahones to actually fund the provisions to establish the registry necessary to enforce it.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.53  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Nowhere Man @6.2.52    7 years ago

Because both parties have profited immensely via illegals , there was never any teeth in penalties.

i had to close a once profitable small corporation due to not being able to compete with illegals, and the ILLEGAL Companies (Say like Trumps') that hired them.

Play by the rules, and i'm the fool.

Something WRONG with That.

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
6.2.56  Nowhere Man  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.2.53    7 years ago
Because both parties have profited immensely via illegals , there was never any teeth in penalties.

i had to close a once profitable small corporation due to not being able to compete with illegals, and the ILLEGAL Companies that hired them.

Play by the rules, and i'm the fool.

Something WRONG with That.

Have to agree with ya here, but that IS the nature of politics......

Same thing happens with gun regulations, but that is a topic for another time....

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.57  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.55    7 years ago

Corporations profit the most.

N

since We All Know, Corporations are people too, people in these corporations profit immensely as well.

Illegals are hired because they work Cheap,and usually they wrok very hard and long, for cheap.

They complain less, as they wish not to bring attention to themselves.

.

They're less likely to sue, for say workers comp. as they're usually not aware or wish not to bring attention to themselves.

.

The owners of companies that hire them can profit and save monoies as well, through the semi legal illegal immigrant hire.

Many times matchingemployers' monies are not sent in as normally required, they are actually employee's and there shuld be Workewrs Comp. covering them, but they lie and say they are sub contractors, leaving Workers Comp. to grow ridiculously for LEGAL entities.

.

They are Illegal to hire, yet are often in demand, as they workhard and save employers a lot by just claiming they are subs/parttimers, thus saving much.

Lock up the employers, and you will stop

"the invading hordes", with no need for a Trumpulthinskin fairy wall tail.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.60  igknorantzrulz  replied to    7 years ago
don't even need a latter

to climb the former

wall ?

I agree with your  assessment, i just can't see this wall being the answer to solve our illegal problems.

The only sure way is to remove their main incentive in my opinion. ( N Ann, i said main, not man)

Lock up the employers , requiring many lawyers  and suddenly, we need not a wall. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.61  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.59    7 years ago

Care to try to answer the actual question?

No, i don't
Kare,
i don't even like Karen
Much.
I'm believing you have a comprehension issue as  well, or at least beginning at the climax of it-n-all.
.
I stated how illegals are only here because of the dix that hire n pay them.
Chop off the head of the Dik, N the serpent dyes, his scale black n Blue...buy you
 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.63  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.62    7 years ago

n e time tex

.

i stated why people were profiting

guessin you didnt buy my explaination

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.65  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.64    7 years ago
And you be "guessin" right.

Well Tex,

nobodies roounds here be guessin you're left

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.66  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.64    7 years ago
I read what you wrote, and responded accordingly.

accordingly to who ?

.

Not aware of your capacity, or background meettin places, but between Jokers and Aces in the hold, i might be so bold, as to dash out one utter explainasdaynation.

.

Illegals ARE SUBSTANTIALLY CHEAPER TO EMPLOY as SUBCONTRACTORS opposed to employee's, often paid partly ,or fully in cash,

n some that I know, Get ASS KICKIN HASH

Brown N Flakey, like a Mexican with dandruff that is head N shoulders above most whence she shows you nhow she Selsun Blues with out clues while like a sleeping bare and naked and afraid of sleepin in the Den with her Ex, Denorex, that is the dilemma debated while i rest my weary beer on the flat top part of her rear 

ended farr ight farr a head of scheduled schedule disruptmeants for people scratching their scalps out, and it's a sin, a scalpicin , off X only obtained on Reservationsfor those who only frequent reservationless homeless Indians onthe verge of Dunkin Donuts into iced cadavres for the cool sensation, that only cold blue lips can grip, with a rigged up riggor mort us with lockmjaw, that you only wished she had mentioned

B 4, you fell head n shoulders under the bus with the wheels that go round n round 

over your fat flat head screw driven after the consumption of ALCOHAULIN ASS , just like we used to do"

have that urge to purge ones who's lathering and blathering is makin em hot, under the ringsaround his Blue collar White Golden Retriever showered with vast amounts of paper macheties, chop ping rears n2o n

 have tanx of walked planx where scurveg is high schooled Dugary, for those who disperse it with a shrugary,

is Adams CoCain A Cola habit, or is he asphyxiated 

oddly enuff, on an even keeled while kneeled  knee pad requiring reassignment

cause as my puppy puddle thoughts befuddle Daffy Duckz when shot at by Elemer ole Fuds, still hangin be a thread  he glued to the psin in his neck,less, the pearls of wisdom, that one mite fiind here

chatting wit Tex

bout whether

he follows the letter of bad intention that i Believe i wrote with my P in the snow, my first N last day tripp, that lasted a few week nights, till i snorted me some coffee  i screamed as soon as i bought it

the farm that is

where i plan on wearing Farmers Jeans, 

cuz mine were dirty

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.2.67  seeder  Krishna  replied to  livefreeordie @6.2.4    7 years ago

Then we have a crisis that could produce a civil war

Yes--  within the Republican Party!

Between the ever diminishing number of Republicans who are die-hard Trump supporters-- and those who are starting to realize what a wimp Trump really is:

Fox Business’ Lou Dobbs On Donald Trump: Nancy Pelosi ‘Just Whipped’ Him

Fox Business’ Lou Dobbs on Friday chided President Donald Trump for agreeing to temporarily reopen the federal government and backtrack on his demand that Congress fund a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has “just whipped the President of the United States,” the “Lou Dobbs Tonight” host told his guests, former acting ICE director Thomas Homan and former Trump aide Sebastian Gorka.

“You know I’m an animated, energetic supporter of this president. But you’ve got to call it as it is,” explained Dobbs. “This president said it was going to be conditional, border security, building that wall, and he just reversed himself. That’s a victory for Nancy Pelosi.”

“It will be perceived as such on every television monitor and screen in the country,” he added.

“And to deny it is to try to escape from reality. And that, we ain’t going to do here.”

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.68  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Krishna @6.2.67    7 years ago
And to deny it is to try to escape from reality. And that, we ain’t going to do here.”

yea, Fox never ain't going to do , hear that ?

me neither,

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
6.2.69  SteevieGee  replied to  Nowhere Man @6.2.52    7 years ago

Reagan Made the E-verify system voluntary so it doesn't work at all.  Put some teeth in it.  Jail time for offenders not the workers.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
6.2.71  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.70    7 years ago

 C”Mon ,

Tex ,   That would be boring 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
6.3  Studiusbagus  replied to  Thrawn 31 @6    7 years ago
Trump supporters are very quiet all of a sudden...

Funny as hell when that shit happens!

Did you look at the "chat now" roster? POOF!

All the usual cocky trumpettes are missing.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
7  bbl-1    7 years ago

I post this with complete fore-knowledge of being totally/irrefutably ( off topic )---However Ms. Coulter did 'tweet' what she did today and it must be assumed that--'that tweet' was also indeed intended for 'the twitter in chief' and I demand to know if the 'sender and receiver' of this stupendous tweet were nekked at the time.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
8  pat wilson    7 years ago

Someone should throttle that geek's pencil neck.

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
9  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו    7 years ago

The title for  sequel to Scumbag's last book has already been chosen:   The Fart of the Deal .

Meanwhile, enjoy this:

512

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
9.1  Kavika   replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @9    7 years ago

The memes is great.....LMAO

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
9.2  epistte  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @9    7 years ago
The title for  sequel to Scumbag's last book has already been chosen:  The Fart of the Deal. Meanwhile, enjoy this:

OK, that's funny............

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
10  JohnRussell    7 years ago
A political action committee that pushes for stricter immigration controls said Thursday it is launching a campaign to draft conservative writer Ann Coulter to challenge President Trump.
ann_coulter_for_president_bumper_sticker-r8d3279b46a3b4c2889ae7be4d2bc0a16_v9wht_8byvr_324.jpg

Americans for Legal Immigration PAC has been among those most critical of Mr. Trump’s latest immigration proposal that includes temporary legal status for some 700,000 illegal immigrant “Dreamers” now protected by the Obama-era DACA program.

ALIPAC, which had been a backer of Mr. Trump’s in the 2016 election, says it’s lost faith and is now seeking a new champion.

“I hope Ann Coulter will give serious consideration to running against Trump in the primary and run on a MAGA platform offering conservative voters a pledge to keep her promises … unlike Trump!” said William Gheen, president of ALIPAC.

He said he hoped such a bid would at least convince Mr. Trump to worry about his base voters as he prepared for re-election, and perhaps force him to abandon his latest immigration plans.

There is so little in this misbegotten political era that gives me any pleasure. But the idea of Ann Coulter ruhning to Donald Trump's right on immigration in the presidential race made me smile for the first time today.

Go for it Ann! Your country needs you.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
10.1  epistte  replied to  JohnRussell @10    7 years ago

I'm a supporter of LGBT rights, so I'll keep my opinion of Ann Coulter to myself. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
10.1.1  JBB  replied to  epistte @10.1    7 years ago

Trust, it is hard for all of us to discuss Coulter while remaining PC...

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
10.1.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  epistte @10.1    7 years ago
I'm a supporter of LGBT rights, so I'll keep my opinion of Ann Coulter to myself. 

There needs to be an entirely new category created for her though--something that represents an entire new form of biology.  

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
10.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  JohnRussell @10    7 years ago
o for it Ann! Your country needs you.

Americas First Transgender President...?

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
10.3  SteevieGee  replied to  JohnRussell @10    7 years ago

Run Ann, RUN!!

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
10.3.1  epistte  replied to  SteevieGee @10.3    7 years ago
Run Ann, RUN!!

Far, far away...............

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
10.3.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  SteevieGee @10.3    7 years ago
Run Ann, RUN!!

qnd ill be runnin nfaster

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
11  Kavika     7 years ago

bf13224d5balypse.jpg.jpg

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
11.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Kavika @11    7 years ago

A message from the First Family...

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
11.1.1  epistte  replied to  Thrawn 31 @11.1    7 years ago
A message from the First Family...

Which one is the first lady? 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
11.1.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  epistte @11.1.1    7 years ago

SIZZZZZZZZZZZZLE..................OUCH!!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
12  Kavika     7 years ago

th?id=OIP.ENrCo_hUfgVhy91bdlC0sAHaHa&pid=15.1&P=0&w=300&h=300

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
12.1  epistte  replied to  Kavika @12    7 years ago

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
12.1.1  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  epistte @12.1    7 years ago

That gets the highest guffaw rating:

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
12.1.2  epistte  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @12.1.1    7 years ago
That gets the highest guffaw rating:

I liked it. The Brits have a great sense of humor. 

 
 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
Junior Quiet
12.1.3  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  epistte @12.1.2    7 years ago

Not to mention a nod to Pink Floyd. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
14  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     7 years ago

. Opps 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
15  JBB    7 years ago

Such a wretched loathsome being she is and Coulter is not any better...

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
17  luther28    7 years ago

Coulter blasts Trump over shutdown deal: 'Biggest wimp ever to serve as president'

I continue to be amazed that folks who are allegedly so bright are just beginning to figure this out. He has not altered His MO since the 70's when He first appeared on the scene, same scumbag He has always been. 

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Quiet
17.2  katrix  replied to  luther28 @17    7 years ago

That says it perfectly.  I've despised him for decades ... he's a blustering fool who cares for nothing except his ego.  But he always backs down when someone has the balls to stand up to him (although he does try to go after them when they do it).  Too bad the GOP speakers didn't have any balls when they were in charge of the entire government.  The GOP thinks they work for him, not for us, and they are too scared of his tweets to do their jobs.  The Senate is the President's equal, they are not supposed to be his toadies.

 He'd be happy to let his followers starve and yet their hatred for our country's principles is so great that they worship him anyway.

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
17.2.1  luther28  replied to  katrix @17.2    7 years ago

I would say that you have Him fairly well figured out, in my opinion at least.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
19  lady in black    7 years ago

50608298_1017309455136468_5958658453319712768_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_eui2=AeHZ43Si4BPuP3I4croMnjhKPhvCERmtRGOAE_UVUqFmrFDqhEn_qDB4EO7b9OY81DHZlUCpF4Wu8FvZBPE5dPknBg6yhA9T-_8HDZNxPKF1Nw&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=e4f8dc0f3e173d4aa04ff426a7acd020&oe=5CB55FF4

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
20  Colour Me Free    7 years ago

As always, interesting comments .. but I am curious about a couple of things ...

First off … I have heard nothing but whiny, crying and gnashing of teeth over the poor government workers being so sacred and how they have bills to pay .. but Nancy Pelosi and Trump kept the government shuttered by not being willing to deal, Pelosi even planned to leave the country for a week, just to prove she would not make any deals? (more money has been pissed down the drain in 35 days than the 5.7 Billion the president asks for)

Now the president agrees to a temporary measure to take pressure off the 'sacred' government employees and he is a wimp, a pussy .. got his ass kicked by a girl?  What is this supposed ass kicking going to be worth if Nancy Pelosi, by not dealing once 'again' gets the government shut down … who is then to blame?  Trump conceded and helped the government workers and he is 'owned' by Pelosi  .. Pffft - balls in Nancy's court now...

I welcome another government shut down if the sum of 5.7 Billion dollars is not negotiated … there needs to be a barrier at the border … will it stop the die hard from entering the country, NO .. but fancy alarms do not prevent your house from being robbed if someone is truly determined to get in either (do not feel secure behind your fence as it stops nothing)...  yet it deters the average 'thief / intruder'.   Why grow the government any bigger?  Seems that is the (D)'s idea of border security (?) .. bigger government, more employees?  70 Billion dollars is already in the budget for personnel and security at ports of entry - so this whole thing is about the word WALL and its 'symbolism' .. not about the barrier / fence at the border... the government shutdown is all about a WORD Trump uses!

Our elected officials are jokes!

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
20.2  Colour Me Free  replied to  Colour Me Free @20    7 years ago
70 Billion dollars

My bad,  I should have said 'somewhere' around 70 billion … 70b is the number that was used on Meet the Press last weekend.

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
20.3  Phoenyx13  replied to  Colour Me Free @20    7 years ago
Why grow the government any bigger?  Seems that is the (D)'s idea of border security (?) .. bigger government, more employees? 

good evening Colour Me Free ! i always enjoy your point of view :) This part struck me as odd. Wouldn't a big wall around the country (or even just the southern border etc) expand the government as well and need more employees and more oversight from the government ? seems that both sides want a bigger government - in just different ways (at least to me).

 
 
 
Colour Me Free
Senior Silent
20.3.1  Colour Me Free  replied to  Phoenyx13 @20.3    7 years ago

Hello and Good morning Phoenyx .. it has been a while, hope all is good with you ...

As to growing the government by building a wall, would that not be temporary growth?  I am not really positive, but to me it would seem like once the barrier was in place the sensor system would be far more affective as would drones .. contractors are not necessarily considered employees of government .. as to the oversight, once again, once the barrier is in place, how much oversight could be needed?

Interesting points though .. I do not know where to find the information - I googled a lil .. but I think it is uncharted territory as to what a barrier at the border would do to the size of government...  I did read that the 'gang of 8' plan would have increased fulltime border patrol officers to 38+ thousand and increased border spending by roughly 44 Billion over 10 years .. included physical barriers at the border, double fence .. more technological surveillance with drones and sensors …. sounds like major over kill to me - why build a barrier, then turn the border into a militarized zone?

I will see what other info I can find after I cook breakfast...

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
20.3.2  Phoenyx13  replied to  Colour Me Free @20.3.1    7 years ago
Hello and Good morning Phoenyx .. it has been a while, hope all is good with you ...

everything is good considering the time of year :) just getting through winter lol

As to growing the government by building a wall, would that not be temporary growth? 

i guess that really depends on the plan they have for it - which is as clear as cement it seems

I am not really positive, but to me it would seem like once the barrier was in place the sensor system would be far more affective as would drones .. contractors are not necessarily considered employees of government .. as to the oversight, once again, once the barrier is in place, how much oversight could be needed?

well you'd need maintenance and repair - especially for tech, you'd need updates for software and maintenance for hardware - so how much of that would be contractors and how much would not ? plus, are they having more border guards ? plan is as clear as cement... so the possibility does exist that government could be expanded

Interesting points though .. I do not know where to find the information - I googled a lil .. but I think it is uncharted territory as to what a barrier at the border would do to the size of government...  I did read that the 'gang of 8' plan would have increased fulltime border patrol officers to 38+ thousand and increased border spending by roughly 44 Billion over 10 years .. included physical barriers at the border, double fence .. more technological surveillance with drones and sensors …. sounds like major over kill to me - why build a barrier, then turn the border into a militarized zone?

turning it into a militarized zone seems to be exactly what many of the wall supporters want - that definitely increases government.

I will see what other info I can find after I cook breakfast...

please let me know if you find anything - so far this is as clear as cement...

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
21  Raven Wing     7 years ago

Ann Coulter is on a par with Trump when it comes to ego and arrogance. If only she was even half as important and intelligent as she thinks she is, then perhaps her words might carry some meaning. As that is not the case, they are just so much ht air, just like her "wimp" in the WH.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
21.1  pat wilson  replied to  Raven Wing @21    7 years ago

Her primary goal is to sell her books. There's really not much "there" there.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
21.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Raven Wing @21    7 years ago
s that is not the case, they are just so much ht air, just like her "wimp" in the WH.

B leave Mann Coulter could Mann Handle ole puddin puffed rice pilaf bellied Trumpullthinskin in a strapon show down for a strapping ole strappless extrapolated won you lost, especially when one did date tit for tat tic for tix to the closing curtainless drapes 

pulled

like pork, from the bone of contention

sorry Raven, but you may have heard my Raven post prior 

so disregard, and discard, this pathetic placard 

gotta catch last call b 4 i fall into a winter of solace, wear my torrid autumn will leave you treasonless N afraid of any and all, with Trumpp like minds, so damn small

r/is   hiz handz n hiz so small, really off all this and every winterall fashion moment wear winterall takes all, and wins the coveted fashion statement award, also know as a ? one never questions, but when that ? is put behind my fashion statement  presented by my Maid in Japan to short order cook

the gandering goose necked wrecked gaggle, constantly gawking bout some squakin, from a hickey, chair contusion, like Flower girl Trump, placing tulips on Putins' Peni al dente, with a creamy basal sausage souper gravey dish, as he attempts to spew what the girls all knew, in all the girls faces  behind their bax, premature celebrations , reminiscent of pacing them selves , and to not keep runming on empty treadmills while walking softly on rice a roany paper 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Silent
21.2.1  Studiusbagus  replied to  igknorantzrulz @21.2    7 years ago

Damn man! You stopped. I had a good beat box thing going.

 
 
 
cjfrommn
Professor Silent
22  cjfrommn    7 years ago

I saw this and thought - wow this is a pretty good collection of things that i knew about but could never put into words.

This list of stuff can only be described as ................dysfunctional. 

But i look forward to those who will respond to suggest this list is some how not what it appears to be( pretty dam accurate for us laymen folk). 

And also suggest that puff the magic dragon doesn't live by the sea. 

SMH 

192 criminal counts, 36 people and entities charges, seven people who have pleaded guilty, four people sentenced to prison and one person convicted at trial.Longest shutdown
-Highest rate of staff turnover
-Most days golfing
-Largest corporate tax cut
-Biggest single-year increase in uninsured Americans
-First President to never break 50% approval
-Worst December stock market since Great Depression and has lost 10 cabinet members
- lost 65 executive staff
- 18% increase in US trade deficit
- Since Feb 1st DOW down 3,000 
($3 trillion in value)
- exploded deficit to $779 billion 
- 44 campaign rallies 
- 67 golf club visits
- lost 40 house seats

An archived DonaldJTrump.com page from March 2016 titled “COMPELLING MEXICO TO PAY FOR THE WALL,” reads, “It’s an easy decision for Mexico: make a one-time payment of $5-10 billion to ensure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country year after year.”

---And i am adding this shutdown embarrassment that have turned upside down the lives of 800,000 folks. some who survived this and some who lost everything or lost enough that recovery wont be easy. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
22.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  cjfrommn @22    7 years ago

Yea, but what has the Trumpp administration done wrong so farr...

C'mon, can't even come up with an example ???

 
 
 
cjfrommn
Professor Silent
22.1.1  cjfrommn  replied to  igknorantzrulz @22.1    7 years ago

not sure if your reply is /s/ or for real. 

i give you the benifit of the doubt it is /S/

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
22.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  cjfrommn @22.1.1    7 years ago
is /s/ or for rea

s    is for igknorantzrulz

Q    is for qualitative laking of LA Choy oh boy floating flotsum n getsum momentoss, R D ....Chinese N siamese single shot out putt record of non recorded copies oftenortwenty too many sessions of Jeffrwy in drag me, seasionoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo0oiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidddddddonnnnt no 

singles, of Americans , gone plumb righty out the unplummed out of Eve

ning like an Oriental comment napalmed n  neighked ii    from watt ive heard 

what was that brain teaser of an inquiry  again 

does my S stand for slightly animation sized safe way dafe waze n mens committiee   z, to deal with the itty room                                                                                                                ta B 

2 niwwwwwwwwww                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

shk

i need m a chocolat 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
23  igknorantzrulz    7 years ago

Pardon Moi' , good posters

believe i was sleep posting or sum tin

disregard, as if you haven't discarded em', allready

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
25  PJ    7 years ago

Everyone needs to just calm down. 

What you are experiencing is true reality and not the fake reality that Trump has been peddling.  

jrSmiley_30_smiley_image.gif

I know this is scary.  Take a deep breath.  It's gonna be alright.  Try and take this reentry into reality to consider what those of us who have been living with for the past two years in Trump's false reality.  

We are here to welcome you back to truth and decency.   This is you being reborn.  Embrace it.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
25.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  PJ @25    7 years ago
We are here to welcome you back to truth and decency.

Somehow I think this is but a short reprieve from the trump ed up insanity,

A slight change in tactics at best.

The actors and goals have not changed.

Insanity will return shortly. Enjoy the reprieve. 

 
 

Who is online


107 visitors