Liberal group calls for protests at conservative Supreme Court justices' homes

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  2 months ago  •  152 comments

By:   Anders Hagstrom (Fox News)

Liberal group calls for protests at conservative Supreme Court justices' homes
Activist groups will send protesters to the homes of Supreme Court justices.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Left-wing activist groups are planning to send protesters to the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices following a leak indicating the court may soon overturn Roe v. Wade.

The activists are organizing under the moniker "Ruth Sent Us" and have published the supposed home addresses of Justices Amy Coney Barrett, John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

"Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, LGBTQ+ and immigrant rights," the group's website reads. "We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics."

Demonstrators protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court Wednesday, May 4, 2022 in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Fox News is told there has been a strong police presence at the justices' homes following the leak. The group says they will visit the homes on May 11.

The D.C. Police Department has erected fencing around the Supreme Court building in anticipation of escalating protests this weekend. Police have also activated protest-response units through Sunday.

The move comes after a draft copy of Justice Samuel Alito's opinion upholding a Mississippi abortion law leaked to Politico. The decision would overturn Roe v. Wade if adopted by four other justices.

Chief Justice John Roberts described the leak as a "betrayal" of the court on Tuesday and ordered an investigation into the incident.

Republicans on Capitol Hill have also expressed outrage over the nearly unprecedented leak, while Democrats have sounded the alarms in defense of abortion.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called for the leaker to be prosecuted, saying the move was a transparent attempt to subvert the court's ruling.

"Somebody, likely somebody inside the court itself, leaked a confidential brief to the press, to stir up a pressure campaign," McConnell, R-KY, said. "Whoever committed this lawless act knew exactly what it could bring about."


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 months ago

They are thugs.

FR815_iWQAEGKkx?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

I dont think you know what the word thug means.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    2 months ago

I know what it means to you and Eric Holder.  I go by the actual definition:

thug

[ thuhg ] SHOW IPA
See synonyms for:  thug  /  thugs  on Thesaurus.com


noun

a violent, lawless, or vicious person, especially one who commits a crime such as assault, robbery, or murder: It wasn't uncommon for hired thugs to intimidate shop owners until they paid up.
( sometimes initial capital letter )   one of a former group of professional robbers and murderers in India who strangled their victims.


 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    2 months ago
thug
[THəɡ]
NOUN
  1. a violent, aggressive person, especially one who is a criminal
    What aggression or violence has Elizabeth Warren committed ? 
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.2    2 months ago
What aggression or violence has Elizabeth Warren committed ? 

Oh, I see. You decided to defend the proposed harassment of justices by focusing on the picture I used?   I didn't specify Warren, I don't even know if she'll be part of the mob going out to harass the justices and their families, but she is part of the dangerous rhetoric.

If you need more evidence, check out post 1.3

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    2 months ago

That WOULD BE today's right/gqp/gop/republicans and all of #45's supporters and enablers.  

 
 
 
Hallux
Sophomore Principal
1.2  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

Of course they are ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

the home address of every elected maga POS in gov't needs to be published.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  devangelical @1.3    2 months ago

Thanks for proving my point.


That's another wrap!

 
 
 
Snuffy
Senior Guide
1.3.2  Snuffy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.1    2 months ago

Seems like someone is calling for violence against elected officials.  I thought that was a COC violation on this board.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.3  devangelical  replied to  Snuffy @1.3.2    2 months ago

that's quite the reach around, but if that's what you think, I'm sure you and the rest of the free speech crowd can figure out what to do next...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.4  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @1.3.3    2 months ago

Are you now against free speech?

 
 
 
gooseisback
Freshman Silent
1.3.5  gooseisback  replied to  devangelical @1.3    2 months ago
the home address of every elected maga POS in gov't needs to be published.

Why do you have something in mind?

 
 
 
gooseisback
Freshman Silent
1.3.6  gooseisback  replied to  Texan1211 @1.3.4    2 months ago

Hey....were the Free Speech Crowd, like that's a bad thing.  Tells you how far the Democrat party has sunk. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.7  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @1.3.4    2 months ago
Are you now against free speech?

it probably seems that way to those too ignorant to recognize sarcasm.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.8  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @1.3.7    2 months ago

Or maybe to those ignorant enough to think they even know what sarcasm is

 
 
 
squiggy
Sophomore Quiet
1.3.9  squiggy  replied to  devangelical @1.3.3    2 months ago

“…can figure out what to do next...”

Kill those who hold a different view - is that your claim?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.10  devangelical  replied to  squiggy @1.3.9    2 months ago

I was intimating to flag my comment, but that was obviously rejected, but do feel free to project.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3.11  devangelical  replied to  gooseisback @1.3.5    2 months ago
Why do you have something in mind?

perhaps a summer cocktail party?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.12  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3.1    2 months ago

Advocacy of doxxing other people even public officials is never cool even if the suggestion of it meets with approval by some here.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.13  XXJefferson51  replied to  Snuffy @1.3.2    2 months ago

It Depends…

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.14  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @1.3.4    2 months ago

That’s a new thing with today’s secular progressive left.  Free speech is anathema to that crowd, particularly since Truth Social and now Twitter advocate for it and against ridiculous content controls and hate keeper censors to silence diversity of opinion and belief.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
1.4  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

Anti-choice thugs protesting at a doctor's house:

A detailed summary of violence by anti-choice thugs, including shots fired through the window of Justice Blackmun, the author of the Roe v. Wade decision:

The anti-choice murderous thug who killed Dr. George Tiller:

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.4.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1.4    2 months ago

but, but, but, that's different because,...uh, ...er, ...geezus! 

I guess women need to face the facts, in the conservative xtian nationalist world, a fetus that hasn't been born yet, has more rights than it's female host and killing medical professionals that disagree are fair religious game. the religious vermin [deleted] are no different than those wackos we spent the last 20 years killing in the middle east

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

article-11203-1.jpg

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.6  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 months ago

They are that indeed.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    2 months ago

Yes, those who want to take away women's rights to their own bodies and lives, are indeed thugs.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2    2 months ago

Where did you get that right?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Senior Expert
2.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    2 months ago
women's rights to their own bodies and lives
Where did you get that right?

Start with the Declaration of Independence: 

"certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"

And the Constitution:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    2 months ago

How silly of me, as a woman, to think that I have rights over my own body and choices!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    2 months ago

"Where did you get that right?"

Where did you get the right to make your own choices?????

Now that I think about it, what an ignorant question!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Gsquared @2.1.1    2 months ago

You silly goose.  Those rights are only for the men!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    2 months ago

Do the women in your life have those rights?  Those choices?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Masters Principal
2.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2    2 months ago
take away women's rights

Where were you when this was happening?...................

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Tessylo  impassed  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2    2 months ago
[Abuse of impasse can result in member losing that feature
 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
2.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2    2 months ago

You know as well as anybody else that the left supported that garbage.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.2.2    2 months ago

[Deleted

 
 
 
Jasper2529
PhD Participates
2.3  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @2    2 months ago
Yes, those who want to take away women's rights to their own bodies and lives, are indeed thugs.

That means that the Biden Administration, CDC, and Democrat governors were also thugs, because that's what they did to women (doctors, nurses, first responders, teachers, many more) who didn't want to get the Covid vaccine even though they had valid medical and religious exemptions. Those women were fired from their jobs when they refused to comply with governmental overreach meant to control THEIR bodies and lives ... remember? 

Anyone who's read the SCOTUS draft knows that it doesn't "take away women's rights to their own bodies and lives". All it does is return decisions to state legislatures. Women will still be able to get an abortion if they choose to get one.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Masters Principal
2.3.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.3    2 months ago

jrSmiley_28_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.3    2 months ago

"who didn't want to get the Covid vaccine even though they had valid medical and religious exemptions. Those women were fired from their jobs when they refused to comply with governmental overreach meant to control THEIR bodies and lives ... remember?" 

Stupid bullshit and hypocrisy and ignorance is why these assholes didn't 'want to get a vaccine' when there are no valid religious exemptions.  Don't get a vaccine against a deadly pandemic as a teacher or nurse or first responder, lose your job.  

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Masters Principal
2.3.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.2    2 months ago

Short memory??

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.3.4  Sparty On  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.3    2 months ago

Here, here ..... great post!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.5  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.3    2 months ago

Stupid question?  [deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.6  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.3.4    2 months ago

Not at all.  It was stupid, ignorant, and hypocritical.  As usual

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.3.7  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.6    2 months ago
Not at all.  It was stupid, ignorant, and hypocritical.  As usual

Thx for providing more empirical evidence that his comment was spot on.

Spot on

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Masters Principal
2.3.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.2    2 months ago

Nice edit!!!! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.9  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @2.3.7    2 months ago

Back on ignore where you belong.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3.10  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.8    2 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jasper2529
PhD Participates
2.3.11  Jasper2529  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.3.8    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.3.12  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.9    2 months ago

Works for me .... much appreciated.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.13  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sparty On @2.3.12    2 months ago

Exactly!  They always put us on ignore when we express what we believe and won’t be backed down by them from said viewpoints.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.14  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.2    2 months ago

Not in red states and counties…They have actually hired a lot of such people fired in blue jurisdictions back into the same or better position.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3  JBB    2 months ago

What did conservative justices expect? A parade?

Two in three Americans are mad as hell at them...

No, Americans aren't just going to take it this time!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @3    2 months ago

When did thuggery become an American trait?

Not where I live.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 months ago
When did thuggery become an American trait?

When MAGA appeared.

 
 
 
Hallux
Sophomore Principal
3.1.3  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 months ago
When did thuggery become an American trait?

As with everything else, in 1776, a.k.a. Year 0.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.4  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @3.1.2    2 months ago

Are we down to repeating the words of the dummy in the White House?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
3.1.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @3.1.2    2 months ago

So about the time the left lost an election and a tantrum that continues even today.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @3.1.3    2 months ago

Meh, typical that a little brother feels like that .....

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Sparty On  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.5    2 months ago

TDS is a chronic and abhorrent problem ..

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Senior Quiet
3.1.8  Jack_TX  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 months ago
When did thuggery become an American trait?

Probably around the Boston Tea Party.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.4    2 months ago
Are we down to repeating the words of the dummy in the White House?

Trolling again?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.11  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    2 months ago

It is funny watching them riot in NYC and LA where the so called right will never be taken away. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.12  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ozzwald @3.1.10    2 months ago

There is a dummy in the White House now.  An absolutely imbecilic cognitively challenged idiot.  I’m proud to be labeled an extreme person by let’s go Brandon!  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.1.13  Ozzwald  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.12    2 months ago
There is a dummy in the White House now.

Trolling #2.

 
 
 
gooseisback
Freshman Silent
3.1.14  gooseisback  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.4    2 months ago
Are we down to repeating the words of the dummy in the White House?

Vic, how harsh. You should refer to him as the Imbecile in the White House.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.15  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  gooseisback @3.1.14    2 months ago

I think you're right, he earned that title

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Senior Quiet
3.2  Jack_TX  replied to  JBB @3    2 months ago
What did conservative justices expect? A parade?

Two in three Americans are mad as hell at them...

No, Americans aren't just going to take it this time!

You don't seem to understand the function of the Supreme Court.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Jack_TX @3.2    2 months ago

In his decision Alito talked about how easy it has become for women to handle the situation of unwanted children.  

federal and state laws ban discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, that leave for pregnancy and childbirth are now guaranteed by law in many cases, that the costs of medical care associated with pregnancy are covered by insurance or government assistance; that States have increasingly adopted "safe haven" laws, which generally allow women to drop off babies anonymously; and that a woman who puts her new­born up for adoption today has little reason to fear that the baby will not find a suitable home. 

Is that sort of "decision" a function of the Supreme Court? 

What does any of that have to do with the Constitution? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    2 months ago
"and that a woman who puts her new­born up for adoption today has little reason to fear that the baby will not find a suitable home." 

This is some serious ignorance right here.  How many kids are now in the foster care system?????????????????

Little reason to fear that the baby will not find a suitable home??????????????????????

So much male arrogance

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    2 months ago
"What does any of that have to do with the Constitution?" 

I note they never answer that question or just deflect, as usual

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
3.2.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.2    2 months ago
This is some serious ignorance right here. 

For sure

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.5  Tessylo  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.2.4    2 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
3.2.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.5    2 months ago
arrogance, which I know you're quite familiar with.

I am very familiar with it.  I know several liberals and see more arrogant (and elitist)  on MSNBC when  I am channel surfing

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.2.6    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
3.2.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.7    2 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.9  Tessylo  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.2.8    2 months ago

yea, yea, yea

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.10  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.9    2 months ago
yea, yea, yea

pithy!

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Senior Quiet
3.2.11  Jack_TX  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    2 months ago
Is that sort of "decision" a function of the Supreme Court? 

That probably depends largely on where a person believes life begins.  If you believe it begins at conception, it's definitely a SCOTUS function to protect those innocent lives.  If you believe it begins at birth, it's definitely not the place of the SCOTUS to abridge a woman's right to control her own body.

The thing many people don't like to talk about is that there are defensible arguments for both of those views.  

What does any of that have to do with the Constitution? 

Abortion falls into the vast swathe of issues that aren't directly addressed by the Constitution.  So the justices have to do the best they can to apply their understanding of the Constitution to the specific case at hand.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
3.2.12  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.9    2 months ago
yea, yea, yea

Indubitably

 
 
 
TOM PA
Freshman Silent
3.2.13  TOM PA  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.2    2 months ago

Foster care and orphanages= 400,000+/-

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.14  Tessylo  replied to  TOM PA @3.2.13    2 months ago

Insane.  If this happens, how many more in an over burdened system to begin with?  Unbelievable

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
3.2.15  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    2 months ago
What does any of that have to do with the Constitution? 

What does abortion have to do with the Constitution?

It's amazing that Alito is attacked by progressives for responding, in dicta,  to criticisms leveled by progressives.

If you read the draft opinion, you wouldn't have a problem understanding how Alito dealt with the Constitutional issues raised.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.16  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jack_TX @3.2.11    2 months ago

Which is why leaving the matter to the states is the best possible option here

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Senior Quiet
3.2.17  Jack_TX  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.16    2 months ago
Which is why leaving the matter to the states is the best possible option here

I think that's problematic, too.

If you really believe that abortion is killing a child, how are you possibly OK with that being legal in Oregon?

If you really believe abortion is not killing a child, what right does Alabama have to restrict it?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.3  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @3    2 months ago
What did conservative justices expect? A parade?

Perhaps they expected people to respect the Court's decision?

Two in three Americans are mad as hell at them...

So what? Plenty of Americans are pissed at this Administration, too. So what?

No, Americans aren't just going to take it this time!

As a famous Democrat already told you--elections have consequences!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
PhD Participates
3.4  Jasper2529  replied to  JBB @3    2 months ago
What did conservative justices expect? A parade?

Do you actually believe that the conservative SCOTUS justices doxed their own addresses? ROFL!

Two in three Americans are mad as hell at them [conservative SCOTUS justices]...

Please provide documentation from unbiased sources.

No, Americans aren't just going to take it this time!

There's a lot that Americans "aren't just going to take" anymore, and this unscrupulous leak of a DRAFT, not settled LAW, is only the beginning.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.5  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @3    2 months ago

Americans just aren’t going to take it being empowered to participate in making major decisions instead of one side cramming their BS down our collective throats since Jan 1973 /s

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 months ago

BIDEN: "The idea that we're gonna make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to choose to abort a child based on a decision by the Supreme Court I think goes way overboard."

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5  Tessylo    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
5.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tessylo @5    2 months ago

[Flag or go to Meta]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
5.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
5.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @5    2 months ago
I'm wondering what that garbage article from the Washington Examiner has to do with women's rights and abortion???????????????????????????????

Why did you bring it up in post # 2?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Tessylo  impassed  Right Down the Center @5.2    2 months ago
[Over use of impass]
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6  JBB    2 months ago

Liberal groups will whoop the gop in the midterms!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @6    2 months ago

Anytime you want to make a wager on that, I'm here.

There is no rule against that.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.1    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Tessylo  impassed  Sparty On @6.1.2    2 months ago
[ABUSE OF IMPASSE  CAN CAUSE MEMBER TO LOSE THAT FUNCTION]
 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.2  Sparty On  replied to  JBB @6    2 months ago

Lol ..... Dems six pack of wupass is coming this summer and fall.

And it is going to be full watching the usual snowflakes here melt

Funny as hell

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Senior Quiet
6.3  Jack_TX  replied to  JBB @6    2 months ago
Liberal groups will whoop the gop in the midterms!

I'm not so sure.  If this happened in October, it would probably help them.  

Americans are famous for our lack of attention span.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.4  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @6    2 months ago
Liberal groups will whoop the gop in the midterms!

LMMFAO!

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.4.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @6.4    2 months ago

It is amazing the mile wide blinders some on the liberal left are afflicted with!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
PhD Participates
6.5  Jasper2529  replied to  JBB @6    2 months ago
Liberal groups will whoop the gop 

In middle school, I read that the Confederates claimed something like that in 1861! jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
7  Sparty On    2 months ago

Call out to all progressive harpy’s.

It’s warming up, time to leave your basements and tents to protest ......

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @8.1    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Hallux
Sophomore Principal
8.1.2  Hallux  replied to  Tessylo @8.1    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Snuffy
Senior Guide
8.2  Snuffy  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Snuffy @8.2    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.2.1    2 months ago

We're not the angry ones.  We see the desperation every day from the 'right'.  I mean look at the front page.  A lot of whining and pissing and moaning.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.2    2 months ago
I mean look at the front page.

You don't like what you see?  Elections have consequences.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
8.2.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @8.2.2    2 months ago
A lot of whining and pissing and moaning.  

It is not too late to stop.  Taking a deep breath may help.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.2.5  Tessylo  impassed  Right Down the Center @8.2.4    2 months ago
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
8.2.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.2.3    2 months ago

I got a kick out of the "we're not the angry ones" argument from the same poster who upvoted the "Two in three Americans are mad as hell" comment.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.2.7  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.2.6    2 months ago

Lol, I know it. At least we get to have a few laughs together.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
8.2.8  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.2.3    2 months ago

Can you imagine if Hillary had appointed 3 justices instead of Trump?  We conservatives would soon be on our way to re education camps /gulags or already there had their vision prevailed instead.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
8.2.9  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Sean Treacy @8.2.6    2 months ago

Seems like the phrase "..we're not the angry ones." is becoming a recurrent theme.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
8.3  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
PhD Guide
9  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 months ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
10  Sean Treacy    2 months ago

Imagine thinking Ginsburg would approve of these tactics.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
10.1  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @10    2 months ago

Such tactics do have the approval of folks like Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Goebbels. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
10.1.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sparty On @10.1    2 months ago

And domestic bicoastal secular progressive urban elites

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11  seeder  Vic Eldred    2 months ago

"IF I DIE DON'T LET ME VOTE DEMOCRAT".....Donald Trump



 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @11    2 months ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @11    2 months ago

[REMOVED,  Changed the removed comment slightly and posted it]

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Freshman Expert
12  magicschoolbusdropout    2 months ago

Activist groups will send protesters to the homes of Supreme Court justices.

Let the " PEACEFUL PROTESTS " Begin.......... Again !

I wonder if they'll chant ........ " (Fill in the Blank Here) LIVES MATTER" this time ?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Guide
12.1  1stwarrior  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @12    2 months ago

Probably not, but, this is coming from the "We're here to help you" Dems/Libs who believe that force and lies are best at all times.

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Freshman Expert
12.1.1  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  1stwarrior @12.1    2 months ago
"We're here to help you" Dems/Libs who believe that force and lies are best at all times.

“The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.”
― Ronald Reagan

“Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.”
― Ronald Reagan

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @12.1.1    2 months ago

Why do you always quote the actor and the guy who as president was suffering from dementia?

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Freshman Expert
12.1.3  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.2    2 months ago
Why do you always quote the actor and the guy who as president was suffering from dementia?

1 Time is "ALWAYS" in your mind.

Really ?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
12.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @12.1.3    2 months ago

Not to mention Reagan was sharp as a tack when compared to Biden right now.    The guy who has trouble pronouncing three or more syllable words.

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Freshman Expert
12.1.5  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  Sparty On @12.1.4    2 months ago
Not to mention Reagan was sharp as a tack when compared to Biden right now.

Yep !

But the Media doesn't like him, sooooooooooo They tell their constituents otherwise, who eat it up ........ LOL !

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
12.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @12.1.5    2 months ago
who eat it up

Yep .... with a serving spoon ....

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Freshman Guide
12.1.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.2    2 months ago

The actor was a great president.  The guy suffering from dementia is the current president and I don't see him quoted much.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
12.1.8  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.2    2 months ago

Ronald Reagan was perfectly fine while in office. His cognitive decline began after leaving office.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
12.1.9  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Sparty On @12.1.6    2 months ago

And a sippy cup!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
12.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @12    2 months ago

Preborn babies lives matter!  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Principal
13  sandy-2021492    2 months ago

Threads @9.1 and @9.2 removed for meta.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
14  Sean Treacy    2 months ago

Doocy: "These activists posted a map with the home addresses of the Supreme Court justices. Is that the sort of thing this President wants?"

Psaki: "I think the President's view is that there is a lot of passion."

Biden and Psaki are detestable cowards afraid to stand up to the crazies who run the party. 

Just say the leak was wrong. Say doxxing justices at putting them at risk is wrong.

They can still argue for legal abortion until birth until they are blue in the face. 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Quiet
14.1  charger 383  replied to  Sean Treacy @14    2 months ago
Psaki: "I think the President's view is that there is a lot of passion."
That is a lot like saying there are good people on both sides,  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
14.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  charger 383 @14.1    2 months ago
That is a lot like saying there are good people on both sides,

Yeah, but wanna bet the biggest critics of Trump's words won't breathe a word about this shit?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Principal
15  sandy-2021492    2 months ago

Thread @1.3 locked for meta.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Principal
16  Buzz of the Orient    2 months ago
"Liberal Group Calls For Protests At Conservative Supreme Court Justices' Homes"

IMO that's a brilliant way to make the justices harden their resolve and shove their decision down the liberals' throats.  Sure as hell I would if I were a judge.  It may also serve to turn Republican voters who would have voted against the candidates who supported that decision into deciding to vote them in for spite. "Stupid is as stupid does."  (Forrest Gump)

 
 

Who is online


Gulliver
Sean Treacy
jw
Nowhere Man


45 visitors