Trump Pleads Ignorance After Sharing AI-Generated Taylor Swift Images
Category: News & Politics
Via: krishna • 3 months ago • 28 commentsBy: Naomi LaChance
Related:
1. #TaylorSwift The Eras Tour Could Generate $4.6 Billion For Local Economies
2. Taylor Swift Harris Endorsement 'Likely,' Says Expert
3. Taylor Swift Fans Make the Ground Shake, Seismic Activity Detected During Concerts
4 . What Do Terrorists Have Against Taylor Swift Fans? Everything.
Days after Donald Trump shared AI-generated images of Taylor Swift and her fans supporting him, the former president is claiming he doesn’t know “anything about” the images.
When Fox Business asked him whether he was worried that Swift would sue him, Trump responded: “I don’t know anything about them other than somebody else generated them. I didn’t generate them.”
Some of the images that Trump posted on Truth Social depicted women wearing t-shirts that said “Swifties for Trump,” and another showed Swift as Uncle Sam with the words “Taylor wants you to vote for Donald Trump.”
“I accept!” Trump wrote.
Trump seems to be fixated on Swift. In January, Rolling Stone reported that Trump allies had declared a “holy war” against the pop star, and that Trump was privately saying he was “more popular” than her.
In June, Trump reportedly spent a good chunk of time in a meeting on Capitol Hill complaining about the singer. “Why would she endorse this dope,” Trump said, referring to Biden, according to CNN . “He doesn’t know how to get off a stage.”
Trump has also said of Swift: “I think she’s beautiful — very beautiful! I find her very beautiful. I think she’s liberal. She probably doesn’t like Trump. I hear she’s very talented,” he said. “I think she’s very beautiful, actually — unusually beautiful!”
In 2020, Swift made a post on X directed at Trump: “After stoking the fires of white supremacy and racism your entire presidency, you have the nerve to feign moral superiority before threatening violence?”
Days after Donald Trump shared AI-generated images of Taylor Swift and her fans supporting him, the former president is claiming he doesn’t know “anything about” the images.
When Fox Business asked him whether he was worried that Swift would sue him, Trump responded: “I don’t know anything about them other than somebody else generated them.
Some of the images that Trump posted on Truth Social depicted women wearing t-shirts that said “Swifties for Trump,” and another showed Swift as Uncle Sam with the words “Taylor wants you to vote for Donald Trump.”
“I accept!” Trump wrote.
Trump seems to be fixated on Swift. In January, Rolling Stone reported that Trump allies had declared a “holy war” against the pop star, and that Trump was privately saying he was “more popular” than her.
In 2020, Swift made a post on X directed at Trump: “After stoking the fires of white supremacy and racism your entire presidency, you have the nerve to feign moral superiority before threatening violence?”
Wonder who wrote that for her?
I did!
Is he ignorant? Very much so. Does he know "anything about" the Taylor Swift images? Uh, yeah.
Trump pleads a lot and he is ignorant a lot but the two are usually not in the same sentence.
Trump said today that he doesnt want national security briefings because he already knows everything thats going on.
I could probably write an AI app that could accurately behave similar to Trump in various situations.
His phrases are predictable. He mannerisms are predictable. His reasoning is predictable.
Trump is a simplistic arrogant asshole like nobody has seen before.
An artificial personality disorder?
And, how is that any differences?
There is a really funny lady out there that has Kamala down pat, from the dramatic hand gestures to the cackling laugh to the word salads.
No AI even necessary!
How pathetic.
We now have plenty of videos of Harris giving speeches and she is as structured and articulate as one would expect from a former prosecuting attorney, district attorney, attorney general, senator and vice-president.
Trump, in contrast, is increasing his rambling and incoherence. If you want to see word salads, just watch a Trump speech.
By the way, I think this is probably an excellent example of nonsense:
The Hannibal Lector narratives are quite impressive too.
The most common word salads from Trump are the extemporaneous ramblings sprinkled throughout his speeches.
But all you can do is put forth a bullshit GOP talking point while ignoring the 800lb Gorilla (Trump). It is obvious which of the two you want to be the next PotUS.
Harris is extremely sharp and very quick whitted on her feet!
Any who underestimate her do so at their own personal peril.
It is quite amusing to see you rush to attack Trump whenever people say mean things about Harris.
Did you know it is possible to discuss one without the other?
Looks more obvious to me that you do not know me at all.
What I am seeing is a whole lot of P, D and D.
I see people pretending.
Tell me something.
Do Trump's idiotic ramblings make Harris' word salads make a damn bit more sense?
You pretend that Harris has a series of word salads. Of all the historical speeches / comments she has given I know of one that could be considered a word salad.
Her most recent claimed 'word salad' where she spoke of AI was, as I noted, logical and correct. Those who did not understand what she said are the problem, not her. I recommend spending a little time getting familiar with AI and the high level concepts and then listen to her explanation.
She was correct.
Meanwhile, Trump is producing word salads on a weekly basis.
Why won’t her handlers let her have a sit down with the press and explain her policies?
That isn't honest.
Yes, I am aware of your claim
As expected, a deflection to Trump. Can't say I didn't expect it.
How does what Trump does or says make her more coherent?
Off script??
No way!
Policies?
LMAO!
MAYBE she could enlighten us all further about the significance of the passage of time, or maybe even regale us with some story about the time she had so many greens she had to wash them in the bathtub.
Or how she hasn't been to the border or Europe!
I wonder if any of the leftists and ‘independents’ here claimed Adam Schiff was ignorant when he was duped by those two Russian comedians a few years ago claiming they had dirt on Trump collusion, or when Swallwell was duped by the Chinese spy who probably had to close her eyes every time he got in top of her.
If I remember correctly, and I do, there was nothing but silence from them here.
But Truuuuuujujujuuuuump!!!!
Heck, they'll pretend it never happened.
Without Trump, some members would be pretty damn quiet.