╌>
lennylynx

The Unacceptable Support of President Trump

  
By:  lennylynx  •   •  6 years ago  •  282 comments

The Unacceptable Support of President Trump
"There is nothing to talk about here, no chance of reconciliation. If you support Trump, after all he has said and done, you are simply not a worthwhile human being."

As the horror show in the White House churns on, the continued support of Donald Trump by such a large segment of American society becomes more and more outrageous.  How can any normal, reasonable person accept Trump support as a valid, respectable position?

The insane amount of corruption, obvious criminality, open and blatant obstruction of justice, constant lying, complete and utter disregard of basic human decency, disastrous and dangerous foreign policy, the sheer unfitness for office, has gone on for far too long.   Enough is enough already, Trump is a basket case and always will be.  There is nothing to talk about here, no chance of reconciliation.  If you support Trump, after all he has said and done, you are simply not a worthwhile human being.  Defenders of this dangerous buffoon are enemies of America.

Where does America go from here?  Some like to think that when everything finally comes to light, and Trump is exposed for the criminal he obviously is, everything will be ok.  Umm, no, I don't think so Tim.  Trump supporters already know he's guilty and corrupt as hell, they know he's inciting violence with his irresponsible speech, they know he doesn't have a clue what he's doing, and they know he's unhinged and dangerous.  The time has come to call these despicable traitors out for the damage they are doing to America's citizens and reputation around the world.  Trump turns his back on America's allies while praising and enabling the world's despots and brutal dictators, and these cretins stand right beside him. 

 Call me a partisan hack if it makes you feel better, but Trump's unfitness for office has nothing to do with left/right politics at all.  The Trump administration is a horror show by any reasonable point of view.  Every responsible CONSERVATIVE in America is strongly opposed to Trump, and there are millions of them.  No, Trump support is not reasonable, and not acceptable for anyone who tries to claim basic human decency.  The point of view of anyone who supports Trump, is utterly worthless.  It gives me no joy, taking this position on 40% of the country, but accepting the support of Trump is far too much to ask of any decent person.

Tags

jrBlog - desc
[]
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
1  author  lennylynx    6 years ago

Sorry I have to feel this way, but Trump is simply a bridge too far.  Stop supporting this lunatic so he can be removed.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  lennylynx @1    6 years ago

Don't be sorry for the way you feel, I feel the same way

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @1    6 years ago

Not only no but heck no.  We will stand by him no matter what his detractors say about him and us.  All the attacks here do is to cause us to double down on our support for him and for his policies.  We Heartland Americans gain strength by the bicoastal limousine liberal arrogant condescending toward us from their elite ivory towers.  It’s not like his haters can send Antifa into the Heartland to punish us for supporting him.  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
1.3.1  Studiusbagus  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.3    6 years ago

You're going to feel the punishment anyway.

As I correctly predicted, the earnings reports are coming in and it doesn't look good. Nobody is expecting Sears/Kmart to survive past the holidays along with several other large brands...Target just lost 15%. 

Retail is the largest employment sector, employment, sales tax collection, shipping are all connected to this...how do the supporters and Trump plan to deal with this? Neither you nor he have the first clue what to do.

So bad that the market has lost all of it's gainsfor 2018..notice he's not taking credit anymore.

The deficit is rising faster than Obama's. 

Prices for everyday goods are jumping. 

Your "tax break" has already been swallowed up and the tariffs are sinking us lower.

Your punishment will be self inflicted and no liberals to blame.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.3.2  Ender  replied to  Studiusbagus @1.3.1    6 years ago
the market has lost all of it's gainsfor 2018

Guarantee you that they will blame it on the Democrats taking the house.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
1.3.3  livefreeordie  replied to  Studiusbagus @1.3.1    6 years ago

Sears and Kmart have been bankrupt for over 2 decades

Brick and mortar are obsolete as Amazon, Ebay and others have demonstrated.

The deficit is rising because we are getting the pay back from the Fed who bailed out Obama for 6 plus years with zero interest rates.   The interest on the debt which Obama added 10 trillion to is expected to soon be larger than the defense budget

We need more tax cuts and dramatic reduction in domestic spending 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
1.3.4  Studiusbagus  replied to  Ender @1.3.2    6 years ago

DINNNNGGGG!

Fox news did that this morning!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Studiusbagus @1.3.1    6 years ago
So bad that the market has lost all of it's gainsfor 2018..

And.....it's nearly the end of the year. That tells me that the market didn't gain a whole lot this year or something really bad is about to happen

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.3.6  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ender @1.3.2    6 years ago

We will.  At least we won’t have any cap gains or dividend taxes to pay this year.  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
1.3.7  Studiusbagus  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.3.5    6 years ago
That tells me that the market didn't gain a whole lot this year or something really bad is about to happen

It gained great! Everything was on the trajectory set by the last administration.

Then came the savior of the right, dicking with our allies, throwing out bullshit figures, and now tariffs and trade wars as well as his massive fuckup in Korea. 

And something really bad is about to happen..I puled out of the market already, squeezing the last few dimes at the risk of major losses is not for me. I pulled out in 2006 while people were laughing at me, including my ex. She's back to where she was but wasted 9 years getting it back.

The government report came out this week and they smell blood too.

Too many profit driven companies are turning in depressing earnings statements. GE is praying for a miracle. They have been removed from the 500 group it's so bad. 

We have already had a bump in unemployment applications, after the new year I expect the floodgates to open.

And Trump is NOT prepared for this. Nor is his army of doolers.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Studiusbagus @1.3.7    6 years ago

I wish I could pull my stuff out of the market but it's one of those 503c's (???) set up by the state for a retirement fund. I can't do anything except change my percentages of what goes where. I can't pull the money out until I retire

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
1.3.9  Studiusbagus  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.3.8    6 years ago

Yeah, my wife has a secondary account like that. She still works for the state and all she can really do is change her risk factors.

Her pension is still state but as of about 6 years ago they allowed 537c's or something like that. I refused and after seeing the freedom I have to avoid crap coming like this buffoon has initiated she declined, opting to keep the pension system retirement. She said she wants to play "stocks n' robbers" (I named it that so it would take the fear and stygma out of her head) while I'm sitting next to her in my brass urn. LOL

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
1.3.10  Studiusbagus  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.3.6    6 years ago
At least we won’t have any cap gains or dividend taxes to pay this year

Since you have already made the declaration of your worth which isn't even a direct connection to the market, it's safe to say you wouldn't be even close to those fees under ANY president. So I don't know where you get off on this "we" shit.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @1    6 years ago

Not only no but no but heck no.  All appeals like yours will do is cause us to double down on our support for him.  We will do whatever we legally can do to assure he stays in office at least to 20 Jan. 2021 if he decides not to run for re election.  We hope he does run but at his age and if he accomplishes enough he may decide not to.  In that event we will do whatever it takes to assure that those who want him gone will have to resort to overthrowing the constitution to force him out by coup as we will use every peaceful and legal means needed to keep him as our President until his term 1st or 2nd expires per the constitution.  There will be no legal or peaceful lawful means of removing Trump before then.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2  MrFrost    6 years ago

Everyone I know that voted for trump now admits they made a mistake. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.1  author  lennylynx  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

I know some who admit it and some who don't.  No one here at Newstalkers seems to admit it.  He still has the support of a very healthy chunk of citizens.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  lennylynx @2.1    6 years ago
He still has the support of a very healthy chunk of citizens.

These are the same people who believe every single word that comes out of trumps mouth. Sad. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.4  author  lennylynx  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @2.1.3    6 years ago
"The point of view of anyone who supports Trump, is utterly worthless."
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @2.1.5    6 years ago

Who would those reasoned intellectuals be?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.7  Kavika   replied to  Tessylo @2.1.6    6 years ago
Who would those reasoned intellectuals be?

The leader of the pack...LOL

1etqz9.jpg

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.8  cjcold  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.1    6 years ago

And every single word that comes out of Trumps mouth is a lie.

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.9  Studiusbagus  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @2.1.2    6 years ago
That support you refer to is far more than you realize from the headlines given the attempts

Then why did you lose the house?

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.10  Studiusbagus  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @2.1.3    6 years ago
I didn’t vote for him before but that doesn’t really matter where I live...

What? No ballot boxes in St. Petersburgh? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.11  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @2.1.4    6 years ago

Then why have the discussion?  What was your point?  An amen choir of TDS victims congratulating you on your hit piece against us in an echo chamber?  

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
2.2  PJ  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

I still do not forgive them.  jrSmiley_55_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  PJ @2.2    6 years ago

I don’t want the forgiveness of the progressive left.  Their contempt and anger is a badge of honor for us.  I’m looking forward to the next six years of the Trump administration.  

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
2.2.2  PJ  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.1    6 years ago

Pfffftttt

You secretly really really like me X.  I know it so don't pretend otherwise.  

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.3  author  lennylynx  replied to  PJ @2.2.2    6 years ago

Why, HA is totally gaga over you Sweepea, how could he not be??

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.4  Studiusbagus  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.1    6 years ago
I’m looking forward to the next six years of the Trump administration.  

I'm looking forward to his first parole hearing in 6 years.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.5  XXJefferson51  replied to  Studiusbagus @2.2.4    6 years ago

He will need a parole hearing to retire from the White House on Jan. 20,2025 when President Hailey is sworn in as POTUS #46?  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.2.6  MrFrost  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.5    6 years ago
President Hailey

Could be. I actually like her quite a bit. Depending on who she is running against, I could vote for her. As far as trump is concerned? He will leave office as the worst president in history, and that's saying a LOT given how bad GWB was. 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.7  Studiusbagus  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.6    6 years ago

Chances are he'll be gone by way of resignation in shame.

Much like Sarah Palin resigning to escape her charges.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.8  XXJefferson51  replied to  PJ @2.2    6 years ago

We neither seek after nor ask for your forgiveness. Viva Trump!  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.9  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.6    6 years ago

Obama was worse than both his predecessor and his successor.  As to Hailey, there’s talk that Trump could appoint VP Pence to a cabinet position and select Hailey as his running mate in 2020.  I hope she regardless having left the UN establishes residence outside of South Carolina.  I’d like her to pick Sen. Scott as her running mate.  Otherwise Sen. Rubio of Florida would be a very good running mate for her.  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.10  Studiusbagus  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.9    6 years ago
I’d like her to pick Sen. Scott as her running mate

.Rick "plead the 5th 75 times" Scott?

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.11  Studiusbagus  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.9    6 years ago
Pence to a cabinet position and select Hailey as his running mate in 2020.  

Hahaha ! Not a fucking chance. She's bisy ejecting him from every aspect. He's toxic for her. If anything she'll primary his ass and watch as he melts away in a disasterous and embarrassing defeat.

That's if he and the lottle Trumps aren't already kicked to the curb or sent to Leavenworth.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.3  Cerenkov  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

I'm happy I voted for him SCOTUS alone was worth it. [Deleted]

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
2.3.1  bbl-1  replied to  Cerenkov @2.3    6 years ago

And the SCOTUS will deliver what, for you?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  bbl-1 @2.3.1    6 years ago

That is the 64 dollar question, isn't it?

[Deleted] he should want SCOTUS to repeal Citizens United. That decision is going to be very bad news for all Americans one way or another

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.3.3  cjcold  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.3.2    6 years ago

Yep. Multinational corporations flooding the media with far right propaganda is not democracy.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
2.3.7  bbl-1  replied to    6 years ago

You did not answer.

"Disgraceful Confirmation Hearings."  ? ?  Absolutely.  Especially when Kavanaugh asked Klobuchar if she, "Ever blacked out."  There it is.  There you have it.

Besides, Citizens United was on the 'conservative' wish list.  They got it.  Thanks to the conservative court.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.3.8  cjcold  replied to    6 years ago

Citizens United is the worst thing for 'we the people'. It's good for multinational corporations.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.3.9  Cerenkov  replied to  cjcold @2.3.8    6 years ago

It's constitutional. That's why we needed Trump's judicial nominees. Winning.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3.10  XXJefferson51  replied to    6 years ago

Citizens United was one of the better Supreme Court decisions of my life time.  

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.4  Cerenkov  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

He's putting actual judges in the Federal courts. I'm quite pleased with my votes. He will retard the liberal pogrom for a generation.  Winning!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.4.1  cjcold  replied to  Cerenkov @2.4    6 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.4.2  Cerenkov  replied to  cjcold @2.4.1    6 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.4.3  author  lennylynx  replied to  Cerenkov @2.4.2    6 years ago

Please stop deleting comments on my blog, Sandy, and congratulations on becoming a mod.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2.4.4  sandy-2021492  replied to  lennylynx @2.4.3    6 years ago

Thanks for the congratulations, and please see Perrie's comment #14.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.4.5  Cerenkov  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.4.4    6 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.4.6  author  lennylynx  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.4.4    6 years ago

Perrie, Schmerrie, do you always do as you're told?  Raise a little hell for a change!!

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
2.4.7  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  lennylynx @2.4.6    6 years ago

Lenny, refer to my comment @ 14.1.1

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.4.8  author  lennylynx  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.4.7    6 years ago

Yeah yeah, I saw it, please stop turning my blog into a concentration camp!!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.9  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @2.4.8    6 years ago

More like the whole site in my opinion.  I strongly agree with your post and the point you make.  jrSmiley_12_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.4.10  author  lennylynx  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.4.9    6 years ago

Omg...

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.4.11  MrFrost  replied to  lennylynx @2.4.3    6 years ago
Please stop deleting comments on my blog

May want to brush up on that CoC Lenny. Just saying. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.4.12  author  lennylynx  replied to  MrFrost @2.4.11    6 years ago

Fuck the CoC Frosty!  Just saying... jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.13  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @2.4.10    6 years ago

shocking Isn’t it that we agree on something.  When you are right and in this case you are, I’ll say so. We certainly don’t agree on the content of your blog though that you wrote it and believe it doesn’t offend me personally.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4.14  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @2.4.12    6 years ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif  Not sure what the expletive is but well said until the rewrite.  

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
2.5  livefreeordie  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

I didn't vote for him (voted 3rd party) but I will definitely and proudly vote for him in 2020

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.6  JBB  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

No, our federal deficit is exploding because the damn gop in Congress is spending trillions more than the gutless bastards are willing to raise in tax revenues. "Economics is just math" - Bill Clinton...

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
2.6.2  livefreeordie  replied to  JBB @2.6    6 years ago

no, it's because the Fed bailed out Obama with Zero interest rates for over 6 years and now the cows are coming home to roost

CBO projection under Obama

March 24, 2016

As it typically does after the President’s budget is released, CBO has updated the 10-year baseline budget projections it published early in the year. CBO now estimates that if no further legislation is enacted this year that affects the federal budget, the total federal deficit for fiscal year 2016 will be $534 billion, about $100 billion greater than the shortfall posted in fiscal year 2015. If current laws generally remained unchanged, the deficit would increase (in dollar terms) in nearly every year over the next decade and, CBO projects, by 2026 it would be considerably larger as a share of the nation’s output (gross domestic product, or GDP) than its average over the past 50 years (see figure below). Debt held by the public also would rise significantly from its already high level, reaching 86 percent of GDP by 2026.

This year is likely to be the first since 2009 in which the federal deficit will increase as a share of the nation’s output—from 2.5 percent of GDP in 2015 to 2.9 percent in 2016, by CBO’s estimate. That growth in the deficit will result in part from a shift in the timing of some federal payments from the beginning of fiscal year 2017 to the end of 2016 because October 1, 2016—the first day of fiscal year 2017—falls on a weekend. Without that shift of an estimated $41 billion in payments, the deficit projected for 2016 would be $493 billion, or 2.7 percent of GDP.

In CBO’s baseline, deficits rise because growth in revenues over the next 10 years is outpaced by increases in spending—particularly for Social Security, Medicare, and interest payments on the federal debt. The deficit remains at roughly 2.8 percent of GDP through 2018 but climbs to 4.9 percent of GDP by 2026. The cumulative deficit projected for the 2017–2026 period is $9.3 trillion.

One important effect of such deficits would be a burgeoning amount of debt held by the public. In 10 years, debt held by the public would equal 86 percent of GDP —more than twice its average over the past five decades. Debt that high—and heading higher—would have significant negative budgetary and economic consequences (see figure below):

  • Once interest rates returned to more typical, higher levels, federal spending on interest payments would increase substantially.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.6.3  JBB  replied to  livefreeordie @2.6.2    6 years ago

Income minus expenses equal net surplus or deficit.

The gop cut income then blew up military spending...

Increase cost of debt will exacerbate these problems.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
2.6.4  livefreeordie  replied to  JBB @2.6.3    6 years ago

Wrong. Income receipts are up.  Trump proposed 3 trillion in spending reductions this year and Democrats screamed bloody murder.

Trump releases 2019 budget with $3 trillion in cuts

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
2.6.5  author  lennylynx  replied to  livefreeordie @2.6.2    6 years ago

Cows roost??

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.6.6  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @2.6    6 years ago

Now that we have a democrat party controlled house let’s just see how much they reduce spending to curb the deficit since all spending bills originate there.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.6.7  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @2.6.3    6 years ago

Excuse me but federal tax revenues increased after the tax cut.  Spending increased far more. 

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
2.6.8  Studiusbagus  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.6.7    6 years ago

Excuse yourself...even the Treasury says revenues are down 9%

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.7  Ronin2  replied to  MrFrost @2    6 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3  Split Personality    6 years ago

Lenny, I have a lot of cousins and their families around Westhaven & Knights Rds, almost all regret this Administration, regardless of who they voted for.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1  MrFrost  replied to  Split Personality @3    6 years ago

It really is embarrassing. I have a few friends living in Germany and they are shocked at how horrible trump is. Trump literally makes GWB look like a fantastic president and he destroyed the economy. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
3.1.1  Cerenkov  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    6 years ago

Bush was a good president. That's why he was elected for two terms.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
3.1.3  pat wilson  replied to  Cerenkov @3.1.1    6 years ago

Ya, like Clinton and Obama. 

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
3.1.4  PJ  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    6 years ago
Trump literally makes GWB look like a fantastic president and he destroyed the economy. 

I never thought I'd see the day in which I would agree with this statement even knowing that Bush murdered over 3k American military and ousted an active CIA agent.  He is still far better than who is currently in the WH.  Everyone and anyone associated with or responsible for this WH should be utterly ashamed.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  Cerenkov @3.1.1    6 years ago

I voted for GWB...1st term only. 

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3.1.6  luther28  replied to  Cerenkov @3.1.1    6 years ago

At the time I thought not, but relatively speaking (I never thought I would say this) I long for the days of Mr. Bush.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.7  Ronin2  replied to  PJ @3.1.4    6 years ago

What are your thoughts on Obama's murdered American military, which for outstrips Bush?  What do you have to say about the US Diplomat and security personnel that were killed under his watch in Libya; that his administration tried to cover up by blaming a low budget movie on Islam? What do you think of Obama's drone extra judicial killings (and collateral damage) which far outstripped Bush? Obama destabilized 4 (Syria, Libya, Yemen, and Ukraine)  countries to Bush's one (anyone that thinks Afghanistan was ever stable is nuts).

If you hated Bush, you should have loathed, detested, and despised Obama. He was Bush on steroids in every way.  Including increasing the debt, scandals, cover ups, and corruption. He just had better yes men, and women, covering for him.

I will give Trump credit for one thing. Outside of Syria- which he expanded by putting US ground forces in; he hasn't started any new wars- or destabilized any countries. He ssucks; but at least he isn't out to destabilize the planet so far.

What can we expect when the two major parties give us a failed reality tv host; and an un-convicted criminal to chose from as candidates.  We got exactly what we deserve; and judging from the rhetoric on both sides we can expect far worse in the future.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.8  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.7    6 years ago

Obama ENDED the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, he didn't start them. NO one would have died in those two countries had bushtard not STARTED them in the first place. 

But since you went there... How many civilians died in Iraq between 2003-2007? 500,000. Not a peep from the right wing, but Obama kills a goat and the right wing is still crying about it. SMFH

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.9  cjcold  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.5    6 years ago

This independent voted for GHWB...1st term only.

I doubt I'll ever vote for another republican. I've been polarized.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
3.1.10  PJ  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.7    6 years ago

I love these whataboutisms.  Unfortunately I don't play.  I don't care what you or others in your camp think about my posts or my opinion and I certainly don't care about yours. 

Feel free to give Trump credit for whatever you want.   

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  cjcold @3.1.9    6 years ago

I could be persuaded.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.12  cjcold  replied to  PJ @3.1.10    6 years ago

Most of what Trump takes credit for was already trending due to Obama's wise moves.

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
3.1.13  PJ  replied to  cjcold @3.1.12    6 years ago

I agree.  I do think Trump deserves some credit for the stock market but I imagine that will get mucked up because he's so incompetent and corrupt.  

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.14  author  lennylynx  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.8    6 years ago

It was hilarious hearing the right wing hippos whine about the tiny bit of collateral damage that resulted from Obama droning terrorist leaders.  Their hypocrisy is off the charts.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.16  MrFrost  replied to  cjcold @3.1.9    6 years ago
This independent voted for GHWB...1st term only. I doubt I'll ever vote for another republican. I've been polarized.

Exactly. I voted for GHWB as well. Never again will I vote for (R) again, especially after GWB's epic failure of a presidency. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.17  XXJefferson51  replied to  cjcold @3.1.9    6 years ago

Me too.  Just the other direction.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.18  XXJefferson51  replied to  PJ @3.1.10    6 years ago

Funny but I feel exactly the same about you all and my posts.....

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.19  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.16    6 years ago

Except for Nikky Hailey?  

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.20  Studiusbagus  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    6 years ago
I have a few friends living in Germany and they are shocked at how horrible trump is

That's so funny! I have friends in Iran and they say "And we thought we were fucked under Amadinijad's stupidity and ignorance!"

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.21  Ronin2  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.8    6 years ago
Obama ENDED the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, he didn't start them. NO one would have died in those two countries had bushtard not STARTED them in the first place. 

You can't really believe that? What the hell are American forces still doing in both countries then?  

Obama withdrew US forces from Iraq- you can thank Bush's SOFA agreement for that. Obama wanted to keep US forces there; but wasn't willing to agree to the Iraqi government terms for keeping them there.

He then reinserted US forces when the country destabilized. 

The war in Afghanistan never ended. Obama's SOFA agreement has tied the US to a weak corrupt government that will never survive without US military presence.

But since you went there... How many civilians died in Iraq between 2003-2007? 500,000. Not a peep from the right wing, but Obama kills a goat and the right wing is still crying about it. SMFH

Please smack your head against a wall or something that will break your blue tinted glasses. I already blamed Bush for Afghanistan (which he was too weak to defy NATO and the UN on); and starting the invasion of Iraq. But Obama killed far more than goats; claiming otherwise is a flat out lie.  Obama used extra judicial drone killings across far more countries than Bush did; and then changed how combatants were counted.

These are the White House BS numbers Obama put out.

The strike was the last under Obama (that we know of). The 542 drone strikes that Obama authorized killed an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians. As he reportedly told  senior aides in 2011: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”

Here is reality.

It is also because Mr Obama embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties that did little to box him in. It in effect counts all military-age males in the strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent.

If you want tit for tat on who is the bigger butcher. Why not take add up how many civilians died in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and the Ukraine thanks to Obama?

Methods

A systematic cross-sectional field survey and non-structured search was carried out over fourteen provinces in six Libyan regions, representing the primary sites of the armed conflict between February 2011 and February 2012. Thirty-five percent of the total area of Libya and 62.4% of the Libyan population were involved in the study. The mortality and injury rates were determined and the number of displaced people was calculated during the conflict period.

Results

A total of 21,490 (0.5%) persons were killed, 19,700 (0.47%) injured and 435,000 (10.33%) displaced. The overall mortality rate was found to be 5.1 per 1000 per year (95% CI 4.1–7.4) and injury rate was found to be 4.7 per 1000 per year (95% CI 3.9–7.2) but varied by both region and time, reaching peak rates by July–August 2011.

Libya

So I estimate that about 250,000 Libyans have been killed in the war, violence and chaos that the U.S. and its allies unleashed in Libya in February 2011, and which continues to the present day.  Taking 5:1 and 12:1 ratios to passively counted deaths as outer limits, the minimum number of people that have been killed would be 150,000 and the maximum would be 360,000.

Syria

If SOHR has been more successful than any previous “passive” effort to count the dead in a war, and has counted 25% or 30% of the people killed, the real number killed could be as low as 1 million.  If it has not been as successful as it seems, and its count is closer to what has been typical in other conflicts, then as many as 2 million people may well have been killed.

Yemen

Even UNOCHA and the WHO acknowledge substantial underreporting of war deaths in Yemen, and the ratio between the WHO’s passive reports and actual deaths appears to be toward the higher end of the range found in other wars, which has varied between 5:1 and 20:1.  I estimate that about 175,000 people have been killed – 15 times the numbers reported by the WHO and ACLED – with a minimum of 120,000 and a maximum of 240,000.
Since April 2014 when war erupted in eastern Ukraine between the government and Russian-backed separatists, the United Nations estimates around 10,000 people have been killed and more than 23,500 injured.

As for Iraq and Afghanistan you will have take Wiki for the numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)

I never defended Bush; but your blue blinders won't allow you to put Obama in the same category as Bush. You might want to try getting some facts before making baseless assertions.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.22  MrFrost  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.19    6 years ago
Except for Nikky Hailey?  

Possibly. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
3.2  author  lennylynx  replied to  Split Personality @3    6 years ago

Every single person you and Mr. Frost know who once supported Trump have turned against him, yet he still has 40% approval and the Republicans gained seats in the Senate?  Your testimony is nice to hear but if the rejection of Trump was half as complete as you guys are suggesting, the dirtbag would have been removed by now and the Democrats would be holding both houses.  I would love to believe Trump has been completely rejected, but will require more evidence.  My brother is a Trumpist and I'm hoping he has changed his tune by now, will find out at Christmas time.  He was still a Trumpist last Christmas...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  lennylynx @3.2    6 years ago

I don't know of one person who regrets their decision to vote for him. Thanksgiving is going to be really fun this year.

I'm gonna needs lots of Klonepin.....

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.2.2  cjcold  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.1    6 years ago

Being I'm the only liberal in a horde of conservatives, I'm bringing a Taser and pepper spray.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  cjcold @3.2.2    6 years ago

This is my family!

Maybe I'll bring my bb gun

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.2.4  cjcold  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.3    6 years ago

FBI statistics show that most murders are committed during the holiday season by family members. Since my family are all far right wing fascists, think I'll just stay home this christmas.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
3.2.5  Cerenkov  replied to  cjcold @3.2.4    6 years ago

So you are afraid of your family? [deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.6  XXJefferson51  replied to  cjcold @3.2.2    6 years ago

For your own family? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.7  XXJefferson51  replied to  cjcold @3.2.4    6 years ago

I have a mixed family and would never stay away and avoid a family get together over differences of opinion even over politics and religion.  

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
4  bbl-1    6 years ago

The Russian/Putin propaganda machine is effective.  The Trump's record of fraud, bankruptcies, puffy grabbing, sexual assault allegations, adult film stars, playboy bunnies, children in cages and all the rest----and somehow---someway---a portion of the American electorate bought it anyway.  Most definitely the 'shyster act' of American history.

 
 
 
cms5
Freshman Quiet
6  cms5    6 years ago

I find the obsession of President Trump and the labeling of those who support the President to be rather comical. While it is simple to acknowledge that there are extremists on both sides; those who absolutely hate the President, and those who find the President to be the best thing since sliced bread - Neither has the right to belittle the other.

The continued abuse of those who still support Trump doesn't solve anything at all. Hillary proved that during her campaign. The left leaning media and their skewed polls led to complacency on election day. If anyone is to 'blame' - take a look at all of your blue buddies who took a 'why bother' attitude and failed to cast a vote. Winning the 'popular vote' in already blue states didn't cut it either.

Instead of obsessing over the President...gather all of your 'well educated friends' and motivate them into voting. The mid-terms was a start...but not the finish. Meanwhile, if people choose to see positive in this President...letting that get under your skin is just simply juvenile.

BTW - I will continue to support this President as long as he holds the office. You can label me all that you want. Kicking and screaming has never swayed anyone.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6.3  MrFrost  replied to  cms5 @6    6 years ago
Neither has the right to belittle the other.

The right never got the memo. 8 years in office and most on the right STILL can't seem to spell, "Obama". It's oblabla, ostupid, oretard, (not to mention the racist comments not only about him, but his wife and kids) etc. etc. etc.... But we on the left are show respect to tRUMP? Not going to happen. Sorry. 

Honestly, Obama wore a tan suit and the right wing was outraged for MONTHS. Trump slams a gold star family and not only does the right wing media give trump a pass, they actually back him up?

But the left is supposed to be civil and respectful? Um.....................no. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @6.3    6 years ago
The right never got the memo. 8 years in office and most on the right STILL can't seem to spell, "Obama". It's oblabla, ostupid, oretard, (not to mention the racist comments not only about him, but his wife and kids) etc. etc. etc.... But we on the left are show respect to tRUMP? Not going to happen. Sorry. 

I know, right?

cms5 expects us to respect this man when I never saw her rebuke anybody on the right when they mocked Obama and his family with "Obummy, Obummer, Moochelle, etc" or constantly called Mrs Obama an ape or a man.

Sorry, once they get over their double standards I will on mine. I'm trying to take the high road but the hypocrisy of some here on the right is simply breathtaking

 
 
 
cms5
Freshman Quiet
6.3.2  cms5  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.1    6 years ago

Actually, I don't expect anything from you at all.

 
 
 
cms5
Freshman Quiet
6.3.3  cms5  replied to  MrFrost @6.3    6 years ago

Expecting anyone on the 'left' to show respect for the current President would be extremely unrealistic, and I never asked for anyone to do so.

I merely pointed out the obsession and the labeling as being comical and ineffective. We can also include the 'tit-for-tat' mentality.

We all get it - you hate anything that isn't BLUE.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  cms5 @6.3.2    6 years ago

Well all righty then. I pegged you all wrong

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6.3.6  MrFrost  replied to  cms5 @6.3.3    6 years ago
We all get it - you hate anything that isn't BLUE.

My truck is white, love my truck. Motorcycle is black, love that too. My BMW that I sold was silver, loved that car. 

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
6.4  lib50  replied to  cms5 @6    6 years ago

I believe that when one supports a candidate that espouses racist viewpoints, ignoring that to vote for 'other reasons' one leaves themselves open to being called a racist.  I could NEVER support a candidate with those views no matter what I thought it would do to my finances.  EVER.  So many do it without a second thought and expect the rest of us to go along and pretend the racism means little or nothing, and that ain't happening.  There is a line in the sand, and crossing it loses my vote no matter what.  The fact that so many 'values' voters don't care screams volumes to the world.  Stop trying to pretend this race baiting.   And I do agree with you on the voting and those who can't be bothered. 

You continue to support the president,  if you are part of that shrinking base that he speaks and EO's (using is as a verb here) to,  I guess you wouldn't have a problem calling him your president.  He doesn't speak or EO to the rest of us, he could not care less about anybody except those who fuel him, so why would we consider him our pres if he doesn't?  And sorry, but supporting him does put you in that messy place having to defend against charges of racism because that is such a huge part of who he is.  I don't really know how you keep that stench off because it is pretty nasty.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.4.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  lib50 @6.4    6 years ago
The fact that so many 'values' voters don't care screams volumes to the world

It sure does. It tells me that their so-called values have only ever been window dressing

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Quiet
6.4.2  PJ  replied to  lib50 @6.4    6 years ago

Bravo

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7  JBB    6 years ago

The once Grand Old Party of Lincoln is now known merely as, "the gop"...

The gop gave us Trump. Trumpism is misbegotten. So, we all must resist.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
7.1  1stwarrior  replied to  JBB @7    6 years ago

Why?

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
8  Jack_TX    6 years ago

Item one.... Do not confuse opposition to Democrats as support for Trump.  He is in the WH because that's how much America didn't want Hillary to be president.

Item two.... "Unacceptable" ????  When you get to decide what is acceptable for people to believe, we'll let you know.  

Item three....  Despite silly liberals panicking at a new imagined calamity every twenty minutes, life for regular Americans just rolls on along, and is actually better in quite a few ways since two years ago.  The lesson there is that any president has remarkably little impact on your daily life.

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
8.1  Phoenyx13  replied to  Jack_TX @8    6 years ago
Do not confuse opposition to Democrats as support for Trump.  He is in the WH because that's how much America didn't want Hillary to be president.

i love this reasoning.... like you are stating our elections aren't set up to vote for someone but they are set up to vote against someone... guess what ? if you vote "against" someone - you are voting "for" another person whether you like it or not. 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
8.1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Phoenyx13 @8.1    6 years ago
i love this reasoning.... like you are stating our elections aren't set up to vote for someone but they are set up to vote against someone... guess what ? if you vote "against" someone - you are voting "for" another person whether you like it or not. 

You're unfamiliar with the concept of "lesser of two evils", I see.

Yes, people often vote for what they see as the lesser evil.

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
8.1.2  Phoenyx13  replied to  Jack_TX @8.1.1    6 years ago
You're unfamiliar with the concept of "lesser of two evils", I see. Yes, people often vote for what they see as the lesser evil.

oh i'm familiar with the concept and it doesn't change this simple fact that i posted and you quoted:

like you are stating our elections aren't set up to vote for someone but they are set up to vote against someone... guess what ? if you vote "against" someone - you are voting"for" another person whether you like it or not. 

i made the important part bold so you wouldn't miss it this time :) we don't vote against anyone - whether we all like it or not - you are voting for someone. It's a very simple concept, regardless of your personal reasons for voting... you are voting for someone. Understand ? (here's another simple concept - when you vote for someone, then you are showing your support for that someone since you voted for them... let me know if that's too difficult)

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
8.1.3  Jack_TX  replied to  Phoenyx13 @8.1.2    6 years ago

None of your lovely but pointless pedantic escapades change the fact that one should not mistake opposition to Hillary as support for Trump, any more than one should presume the citizens of Flint, Michigan drink contaminated water because they prefer it.  They simply have no other option.

Many, many, many people who voted for Trump don't like him at all.  But they would rather have his obnoxious yankee ass than Hillary.

I didn't vote for Trump.  But in no way should my vote be construed as support for Hillary.  She is an utterly reprehensible, vile, and despicable human being.  I would have voted for Trump if Bernie had been his opponent.  I can't stand Trump, but I would have voted for Charles Manson to keep Bernie out of the WH.

So we choose from the options the extremist nutjobs of our country present us.  That does not mean we support them.

 
 
 
Phoenyx13
Sophomore Silent
8.1.4  Phoenyx13  replied to  Jack_TX @8.1.3    6 years ago
None of your lovely but pointless pedantic escapades change the fact that one should not mistake opposition to Hillary as support for Trump, any more than one should presume the citizens of Flint, Michigan drink contaminated water because they prefer it.  They simply have no other option.

i guess the simple set up of our elections escapes you - you don't vote against anyone, you only vote for someone (regardless of your personal reasons for hating or not wanting to support another candidate) which means - if you voted for Trump, on paper whether you like it or not (you can't escape this) - you support Trump.

Just like in Flint Michigan - there were other options (4 candidates total or choosing not to vote in the case of the election --- people could get bottled water etc in the case of Michigan).

Many, many, many people who voted for Trump don't like him at all.  But they would rather have his obnoxious yankee ass than Hillary.

which means - if you voted for Trump then you supported him over Hillary (guess what ? that means you support Trump - if you voted for him - since we vote for people and not against people)

I didn't vote for Trump.  But in no way should my vote be construed as support for Hillary.  She is an utterly reprehensible, vile, and despicable human being.  I would have voted for Trump if Bernie had been his opponent.  I can't stand Trump, but I would have voted for Charles Manson to keep Bernie out of the WH.

which means you support other people besides Trump. Congrats !

So we choose from the options the extremist nutjobs of our country present us.  That does not mean we support them.

if you vote for someone - then on paper (and you can't escape this) you support that person since we vote for people and not against people (this is a very simple concept, i'm not sure why you don't understand it)

To pretend otherwise is silly at best. we don't have elections to vote against people and your personal reasons for voting for someone is irrelevant - the fact remains you voted for that person which means you support them, period. Do you understand now ?

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
9  Dean Moriarty    6 years ago

Nobody gets everything they want in a President the Jebists are not going to be happy with all of Trumps moves same as the Rand Paulists. One thing is almost all Republicans will agree Trump is better than anything the Dems have to offer. He has helped to slow the plague of socialism infesting the country. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
9.1  author  lennylynx  replied to  Dean Moriarty @9    6 years ago

Well, if you think the country is too far left, any right winger would be better than any left winger, ideology wise.  Sure, I get that, I would prefer left Presidents because I think the country is too far right.  BUT, my complaints about Trump have NOTHING to do with left/right politics.  The guy is a total basket case, it's like having a spoiled angry 5-year-old for a president.  His foreign policy is even MORE horrible from a right wing standpoint.  Can you imagine what the hypocrite party would be saying if a Democratic president sucked up to Putin and dissed our allies one tenth as much as Trump does?  They would be peeling Repuke politicians off the congressional CEILING for chrissake.  Sure, I don't like the corporate tax cut or the far right justices, but that's NOT what I'm complaining about.  Trump could not possibly be more unfit for the office he holds.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
9.1.2  Cerenkov  replied to    6 years ago

Psychosis.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
9.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dean Moriarty @9    6 years ago

You are correct that socialism is an infestation in America.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10  Tessylo    6 years ago

H'e is in the WH because that's how much America didn't want Hillary to be president.'

Only item . . . More than 3 million voters WANTED HILLARY TO BE PRESIDENT.  

'and is actually better in quite a few ways since two years ago.'

which 'quite a few ways' would they be?

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
10.1  KDMichigan  replied to  Tessylo @10    6 years ago
Only item . . . More than 3 million voters WANTED HILLARY TO BE PRESIDENT.  

Who freaking cares other than some uninformed proglibs?

If all of California and New York voted for Hillaryious Hillary who gives a crap, that is why we have the EC. 

If people love left leaning states so much then move there.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
10.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Tessylo @10    6 years ago
Only item . . . More than 3 million voters WANTED HILLARY TO BE PRESIDENT.  

63 million people were so against Hillary that they were willing to vote for one of the most hated men in America, if not the world.  Hatred of Trump goes back to the 1980's and beyond...in case you believed that Millennials invented it.  Yet tens of millions of Americans saw Trump as a better option than Hillary.  

which 'quite a few ways' would they be?

Unemployment is lower.  Minority unemployment is lower.  Wages are higher.  The economy is growing.  The stock market is up.  Median net worth is up.  

For regular Americans who work, pay bills, raise kids, and pay their own way, things are better than they were two years ago.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Jack_TX @10.2    6 years ago

jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
10.2.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.1    6 years ago

I'll consider that your concession of the point.  

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
10.2.3  Cerenkov  replied to  Jack_TX @10.2.2    6 years ago

That's all she has.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Jack_TX @10.2.2    6 years ago
'I'll consider that your concession of the point.'

Nope.

You're also incorrect in the quite a few ways.  No proof, no sources, not true.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
10.2.5  Jack_TX  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.4    6 years ago
You're also incorrect in the quite a few ways.

That you are unable to enumerate.  Even after two weeks.

So if you haven't conceded the point, I presume you have a more intelligent rebuttal than "is not either" followed by sticking your tongue out?    However based on past history, I'm not hopeful.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12  JohnRussell    6 years ago

Donald Trump has never ever ever been a legitimate politician.  His entire political career is fruit from a poisoned tree. People who support Trump in the face of the mountains of evidence that he is a horrible human being and horrible president must then be considered to be among the worst people in America. They support something that has tremendously damaged the country despite the fact that they know it is horrible. If they don't see it is horrible, then they are the worst for their profound ignorance. 

Donald Trump's political career was BORN in a lie. In 2011 he wanted to create a political following among Republicans because he wanted to run for president in 2012. He saw the "birther" movement among tea party Republicans as a place where he could create a political brand for himself and a voter base. So voila he became the nation's chief birther, spending months peddling nonsense intended to discredit President Obama. Trump knew every word he was saying was a lie, but he did it anyway. Because he is a life long liar. 

No patriotic American should have ever again given Trump credence as a politician or a political candidate. He was , in effect, disgraced. 

But, the worst among us welcomed Trump into the 2016 presidential primaries. The very first thing Trump did was to lie about people coming up here from Mexico. Soon he led off his debate appearances by insulting a reporter about menstrual bleeding. He also said that one of his female opponents was too ugly to be taken seriously as a candidate. He called almost every one of his primary opponents childish, idiotic, nicknames. The worst among us laughed and thought this was all jolly fun. Soon Trump was asking the Russians to steal private information from his Democratic opponent. He cozied up to the Russian dictator. Again the worst among us approved. 

Trump's presidency has had a theme of daily chaos. People who know Donald Trump well say the only thing he cares about is fighting. There have been 4 or 5 books written, just in the first two years, that detail, and name names, that discuss the massive dysfunction of the Trump administration. Multiple Trump cabinet members have either been forced to resign or are under investigation for corruption within their departments related to abuse of power or attempts to unethically financially enrich themselves.  

For the first time in modern American history white racists and white nationalists have openly supported and endorsed the president of the United States. That may be in part because Trump and his sons have openly passed on information from white racists and white supremacists on social media. In any case, racist support for Trump and his acceptance of that support is an open secret. The worst among us support Trump in spite of that truth. 

Trump has tried to eliminate every vestige of his immediate predecessors from memory, which has led him to support repeal of "Obamacare" even though Trump has said during the campaign and prior to that , that he supports medical insurance coverage for all. He has us in uncertain and perturbed relations with our closes allies in the world, even while making nice nice with dictators and authoritarians around the world. 

Most of all, Trump is a hopelessly serial liar. He was recently documented making 30 lies every day, as he was trying to convince the worst people in America to vote for him and his chosen candidates in the election. What motivates someone to support a leader who lies to the public 30 times a day?  

It is hardly unfair to refer to Trump supporters in unflattering ways. The real question is why do others , independents, moderates, libertarians, accept Trump as just another "partisan". 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
12.1  Jack_TX  replied to  JohnRussell @12    6 years ago
Donald Trump has never ever ever been a legitimate politician.

You say as though there is such a thing as a "legitimate" politician...and they're not all bastards.  

You also say that as though being a "legitimate politician" is somehow a good thing.  In what universe is that the case?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
13  It Is ME    6 years ago

"If you support Trump, after all he has said and done, you are simply not a worthwhile human being."

I HATE this economy now. jrSmiley_50_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_30_smiley_image.gif

"Calgon" bring me back to the days of Struggling " jrSmiley_15_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
14  Perrie Halpern R.A.    6 years ago

I need to remind people of some things. The CoC is in effect on a blog. Violations will not be tolerated. 

Also when report violations and you are using the note section, please do not send us insults about a member. 

Thank you. 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
14.1  author  lennylynx  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @14    6 years ago

Lol, you better keep an eye on this if you care about the CoC, I'll let everything go! jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
14.1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  lennylynx @14.1    6 years ago

Lenny, 

You need to read the CoC. This is your responsibility to make sure that the CoC is not violated 

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
14.1.2  author  lennylynx  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @14.1.1    6 years ago

I interpret the CoC in a very liberal manner! jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
14.1.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  lennylynx @14.1.2    6 years ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
16  freepress    6 years ago

Take any of the gaffes, the policies enacted, the things Trump says and does, the people he tolerates and appoints, then apply all of it to the name Obama or Hillary.

Nothing Trump does, says, tolerates, enacts, or enables is putting America first, it is tearing down and burning down democracy while he knows the victims who have bought into his con job will cheer him on.

His supporters wouldn't tolerate anything he does if you block out the Trump name and put the name Obama in front of it.

Trump is trying to emulate Hitler and he is trying to recreate the new Third Reich. No one should have a book of Hitler's speeches at their bedside table. 

Yet the rubes who listen to his outrageous diatribes and taxpayer funded "rallies" don't even realize how they are being used.