╌>

BREAKING: Texas Lawmaker Introduces Bill to Begin Process of Secession

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  5 years ago  •  123 comments

By:   Jonathan Davis

BREAKING: Texas Lawmaker Introduces Bill to Begin Process of Secession
If voters say yes, then a committee would be formed to study the matter and make recommendations regarding the best way to break away from the rest of the country, including advice for how to amend the state Constitution to accommodate the proposed nation and recommendations for issues that would have to be negotiated with the U.S. government such as a common travel agreement. “This Act simply Lets Texans Vote.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

An interesting idea.  Liberals had such talk with Bush 43 and Trump now it’s conservatives states looking at it.  Texas having once been an independent country may decide to try that route again. I don’t favor the idea but leveraging it to moderate the behavior of our wannabe rulers who are supposed to be our public services may be useful. 


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



BREAKING: Texas Lawmaker Introduces Bill to Begin Process of Secession



by Jonathan Davis about 4 hours agoupdated about 3 hours ago


Anticipating what they (rightfully) believe will become the most socialist-leaning administration since Great Britain ruled the colonies, conservatives in Texas are not planning on ‘waiting out’ Joe Biden’s term.

They want out, as in all the way out .

State Rep. Kyle Biedermann (R) filed legislation this week seeking to put the question of a “Texit” — a process by which the Lone Star state would become the Lone Star nation — to voters.

Called House Bill 1359, which is also known as the Texas Independence Referendum Act, the legislation called for a statewide ballot in November asking voters if they want to remain part of the United States or “establish an independent republic.”

The Epoch Times has more :

If voters say yes, then a committee would be formed to study the matter and make recommendations regarding the best way to break away from the rest of the country, including advice for how to amend the state Constitution to accommodate the proposed nation and recommendations for issues that would have to be negotiated with the U.S. government such as a common travel agreement.

“This Act simply Lets Texans Vote. This decision is too big to be monopolized solely by the power brokers in our Capitol. We need to let Texans’ voices be heard!” Biedermann said in a statement.

“Voters of all political persuasions in Texas can agree on one thing, Washington D.C. is and has been broken. Our federal government continuously fails our working families, seniors, taxpayers, veterans, and small business owners. For decades, the promises of America and our individual liberties have been eroding. It is now time that the People of Texas are allowed the right to decide their own future. This is not a left or right political issue. Let Texans Vote!” he added.

Texas is unique in that it has its own potential monetary system (via its own gold reserves) and it’s own electric grid. Besides a robust oil-and-gas industry, Texas is also becoming a tech hub, but that may also be the undoing of Texit.

Hundreds of thousands of people have flocked to the state in recent years from California, New York, and other blue enclaves seeking respite from the very things they voted for back home: Democratic politicians who impose higher taxes, more regulation, and other restrictions on liberty (talk about cognitive dissonance).

So now, will there be enough native Texans and conservatives who want to go the way of Great Britain in leaving the European Union? Biedermann isn’t sure but he believes Texans ought to have the choice.

And they do have one, under the state’s constitution: Article 1, Section 2 states: “All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.”

Texit has backers.

The Texas Nationalist Movement noted the filing, saying it “would give Texans an opportunity to head to the polls in November of 2021 and start the process of reasserting our status as an independent nation.”

Constitutional experts say that states have no right to secede, but it doesn’t appear as though Texans are asking for permission.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
2  lady in black    5 years ago

Another pipe dream just like the state of jefferson.  Will NEVER happen.

According to the joint resolution for annexing Texas, Congress said Texas could break up into five states but all would have to be part of the U.S.

And another reason Texas cannot legally secede is because of the Supreme Court case Texas v. White. Even if the Texas legislature voted to secede, the action would be “absolutely null,” according to that Supreme Court case.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
3  CB    5 years ago

Texans who wish to secede, can go to "H." Good riddance, I say. If it takes ALL THIS REACTIONARY BULL PATTY to keep this union together - then just go already. Leave us alone!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.1  Tacos!  replied to  CB @3    5 years ago

Atta baby. Speak the truth!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
3.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  CB @3    5 years ago

I hope they take my sister with them.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4  JBB    5 years ago

We fought our Civil War to prove US to be Indivisible.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
4.1  CB  replied to  JBB @4    5 years ago

There are malcontent states of Americans who never bought into the whole unity 'thing.' They have been dragging their feet for the duration! Our collective 'ball and chain' - their way or nag-nag-nag!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2  Tacos!  replied to  JBB @4    5 years ago
We fought our Civil War to prove US to be Indivisible.

Not anymore. I thought "unity" was a dirty word now. Don't all true Americans hate Texas anyway?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.1  JBB  replied to  Tacos! @4.2    5 years ago

Do not be ridiculous. America is Indivisable...

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Participates
4.2.2  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Tacos! @4.2    5 years ago
Don't all true Americans hate Texas anyway?

Up thoust buttocks.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
4.2.3  CB  replied to  Tacos! @4.2    5 years ago

"Unity" is not a game we play, Tacos! Appropriate the word in context to its specific discussion. In other words, be less "creative-thinking" for now. Also, we don't hate all Texans, we might not hate many Texans. Furthermore, we can love all or many Texans.

The issue is the malcontent Texans who drag, nag, and threaten to 'walk' every few years, because the nation can not afford to let 'them'  RUN THE ENTIRETY OF THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4.2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.2.2    5 years ago

I don't hate TX.  I was stationed there many times.  It gave me laughs galore.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Participates
4.2.7  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4.2.4    5 years ago
I don't hate TX.  I was stationed there many times.  It gave me laughs galore.

Glad we could be here for your comedic entertainment!  jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2.8  Tacos!  replied to  JBB @4.2.1    5 years ago
America is Indivisable...

The rebels will be brought under our heel!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2.9  Tacos!  replied to  CB @4.2.3    5 years ago
The issue is the malcontent Texans who drag, nag, and threaten

Maybe we could create special camps . . . er, schools to reeducate them.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2.10  Tacos!  replied to  CB @4.2.3    5 years ago
"Unity" is not a game we play

No, but it is a word people use without really meaning it.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
4.2.11  Raven Wing   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4.2.4    5 years ago
I don't hate TX.  I was stationed there many times.  It gave me laughs galore.

I spent several years in Ft Worth, TX while my Father was on the FWPD. He was then drafted into the Texas Rangers as a Special Agent with a secret group of Brand Inspectors and assigned to Pawhuska Oklahoma to assist the OK Cattlemens Association to investigate a large cattle rustling organization in OK. When he resigned the Texas Rangers after having helped break the cattle rustling organization, we moved to San Diego, CA.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
4.2.12  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.6    5 years ago

I don't know who you people are who find it 'adorable' to FUCK away years of the only lives we as a nation have to collectively experience together meant for something better—I guess. There is a pandemic with scary "homebodies," sick people, dying people, and dead people and some conservatives and the like got-game days up the ying-yang! Unbelievable.

We have a president who really does care and won't lie to us more times than will and y'all got "game days."

By the way, Russia is glad y'all are on its servers. They are going to light y'all up with all the data points and 'profiles' they are going to steal, plant, and sell and 'make' on U.S. conservatives behalf!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
4.2.13  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @4.2    5 years ago
Not anymore

OK-- then name a few of the states that have successfully ceceded from the Union-- and are now no longer a part of the U.S.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2.14  Tacos!  replied to  Krishna @4.2.13    5 years ago

I don't understand why your question is relevant to my comment. If you have a point, why not just make it?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
4.2.15  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @4.2.9    5 years ago
Maybe we could create special camps

Special "camps"?

Interesting that you should mention that...as today is Holocaust Remembrance Day!

(I'm sure it wasn't deliberate-- probably just a slip of the tongue! jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif )

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4.2.16  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.5    5 years ago

If they secede, they will not be part of this nation except geographically.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
4.2.17  SteevieGee  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.5    5 years ago

... indivisible...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
4.2.18  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.5    5 years ago
Only as long as it’s one nation under God...

Gee, how did this nation stick together before 1954 when President Eisenhower added: "under god"?

Yet we seem to manage for almost 200 years.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2.19  Tacos!  replied to  Krishna @4.2.15    5 years ago

Guess I should have used the sarc tag because you seem to have missed my point.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.2.21  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.20    5 years ago

three words with one punctuation, lol

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.24  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.5    5 years ago

So the US WAS divisible until 1956? 

 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
4.2.25  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.23    5 years ago
God was virtually everywhere in this nation right up to 1962 and since then it’s been almost all down hill from there.  Jan 1973 was another godless moment on the slippery slope...

Right, because the US was doing so well before 1962 too. >sarc<

Jan 1973 was another godless moment on the slippery slope...

Only to those who opposed expanding women's rights. 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
4.2.26  sandy-2021492  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.23    5 years ago
God was virtually everywhere in this nation right up to 1962

What's stopping him from being virtually everywhere now?

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
4.2.27  Gordy327  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.2.26    5 years ago
What's stopping him from being virtually everywhere now?

His probable nonexistence?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
4.2.28  sandy-2021492  replied to  Gordy327 @4.2.27    5 years ago

How very inconvenient for him and his followers jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
4.2.31  sandy-2021492  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.29    5 years ago
Secular progressive leftists and their laws and court rulings since 1962.

He's stopped by human laws?

Not much of a deity, then.  Not nearly as advertised.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
4.2.32  sandy-2021492  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.30    5 years ago

So, I'm supposed to be afraid of a "loving" god who is subject to human laws?

Why?

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
4.2.33  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.29    5 years ago
Secular progressive leftists and their laws and court rulings since 1962.  

So you don't respect court rulings unless they go your way, is that it?

The ruling in Jan 1973 that is still being marched against every year was the ultimate in evil acts and withdrawing from God by our nation.

God is irrelevant to the nation. But pointless marches will not overturn SCOTUS precedent. Maybe you should file your own legal challenge through due process and see how that goes!

People will believe by faith without “signs and wonders so that one might believe”

That's just being gullible. No reason to believe then, much less accept it. 

or they won’t at all right up to the moments before the 2nd coming.  

Or your fantasy "2nd coming" isn't happening, much like your fantasy state of Jefferson!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    5 years ago

In theory, there should be no objection from the rest of the country, right? California? New York? New Jersey? Oregon? Washington?  Massachussetts? They'd all be glad to see Texas leave, right? For that matter, how about the whole South? I hear all the time about how awful these people are. I hear all the time about what a burden they are on the rest of the country. Why would you want to hold on to them? If they want to leave, why would you get in their way?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
5.1  CB  replied to  Tacos! @5    5 years ago

Because this is a UNION. A U-N-I-O-N. We simply want the whole of the country to work. Some states can't make it divided. (Just look at them.) Moreover, it would not take long before a 'single' country-state would realize that its LARGER collective states also hold more influence, power, and wealth (because they do not have a drag of millions or hundreds of thousands anyway - malcontents and 'divided' public policy). Lastly, which side would enter into a military-styled nuclear-sharing authority with the other?

The real problem with our country is people who think and delude themselves into thinking the land and its 'properties' belong to them and their whims alone. That's what is causing the 'bad marriage' right about now.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
5.2  pat wilson  replied to  Tacos! @5    5 years ago

Texas and the south in general have been seeing an influx of liberals moving there, there won't be any secession.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  pat wilson @5.2    5 years ago
there won't be any secession

Oh I agree. I just find it amazing that so much anger, hate, and disrespect is thrown at parts of our population, but when they threaten to leave, the mudslingers get all offended.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
5.2.3  pat wilson  replied to  Tacos! @5.2.1    5 years ago

I'm not offended.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.2.4  Split Personality  replied to  pat wilson @5.2    5 years ago

for info only.

TNM founded in 2005.  Slight uptick in interest when Obama was elected.  "Interest" increased 159% when Trump was elected.

Still, basically an all white group of older Texan males routinely accused of racism or white national feelings for Texas.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.2.5  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @5.2.4    5 years ago

TNM claims over 300,000 "relationships"  but marches around the Alamo monthly, placing a wreath.

and there are never more than 2 dozen marchers, usually half of that.

Kyle started a petition 2 days ago for his Texas Independence Bill.

13,189 signature so far in a state of 29 million.

.

Not impressed yet.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
5.2.6  Veronica  replied to  Tacos! @5.2.1    5 years ago
I just find it amazing that so much anger, hate, and disrespect is thrown at parts of our population

Were you just as amazed when the hatred, anger and disrespect was thrown at the citizens of New York State recently.  Funny, I didn't see you there saying this about them....  [deleted]

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
5.2.7  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @5.2.5    5 years ago

14,112 signatures as of noon Friday...

still not impressed.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.2.8  Tacos!  replied to  Veronica @5.2.6    5 years ago
Were you just as amazed when the hatred, anger and disrespect was thrown at the citizens of New York State recently.

For example?

Funny, I didn't see you there saying this about them

I doubt you were looking.

Guess it has to be a red fight for you to be "amazed".

[deleted]

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.9  Dulay  replied to  Tacos! @5.2.1    5 years ago

Yet you seem to be pretending that 'anger, hate and disrespect' only goes one way. Trump's election challenges prove that to be false since his legal teams and surrogates  went after urban voters [read POC] in the north [MI, WI, PA] and blamed them for his lose in Georgia. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.10  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.2    5 years ago

Says the guy who expresses his 'anger, hate and disrespect' for 'secular progressive coastal elites' every chance he gets. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.13  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.12    5 years ago
It is what the ruling elites in those places deserve.

Your comment drips with hypocrisy. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.2.14  Tacos!  replied to  Dulay @5.2.9    5 years ago
Yet you seem to be pretending that 'anger, hate and disrespect' only goes one way.

Since I didn't say anything to support that idea, what it "seems" to be is probably coming from your own imagination. Everything that follows in your comment is, therefore, a straw man fallacy.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
5.2.15  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.11    5 years ago
The anger is at the government of New York State and New York City for their despotism and capricious malicious rules and actions,

Since you don't live in New York, why should you care?

It is what the ruling elites in those places deserve.

How vindictive. Is that how a so called "christian" is supposed to act?

 We cost them at least 20 billion exposing their shorts manipulation against smaller businesses struggling to survive in a covid environment.  Go Game Stop and others!  Cost them some more!  

Meanwhile, the economy weakens and investors (do you assume they're ALL "elite")  who may have long term investments like retirement investments suffer. Savoring the misfortune of others doesn't seem very "Christ-like." Just the opposite really. Almost...devilish even?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.16  Dulay  replied to  Tacos! @5.2.14    5 years ago
Since I didn't say anything to support that idea, 

Oh but you DID. 

I just find it amazing that so much anger, hate, and disrespect is thrown at parts of our population, but when they threaten to leave, the mudslingers get all offended.

It is hardly a stretch to presume that the 'parts of our population and the 'they' in your comment are ONE side of 'both sides'. 

what it "seems" to be is probably coming from your own imagination.

Nope. 

Everything that follows in your comment is, therefore, a straw man fallacy.

It seems that you are having an issue with what 'seems' means. 

Oh and another misuse of the term straw man fallacy. Well done. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.18  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.17    5 years ago

Which makes your comment obtuse.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.2.19  Tacos!  replied to  Dulay @5.2.16    5 years ago
Oh but you DID. 

Then you should be able to quote me saying so. But you haven't because you can't. Because I didn't say it. You are dishonestly trying to attribute something to me I did not say.

Oh and another misuse of the term straw man fallacy. Well done.

Believe what you like, but at least I'm not lying about what the other person is saying. You should be ashamed of yourself. Seriously.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.20  Dulay  replied to  Tacos! @5.2.19    5 years ago
Then you should be able to quote me saying so. But you haven't because you can't. Because I didn't say it. You are dishonestly trying to attribute something to me I did not say.

I did. Do you deny that your comment implied that ONE side 'throws' 'anger, hate, and disrespect' at the other side? Three days later and you have yet to address the FACT that is NOT a one way street. 

Believe what you like, but at least I'm not lying about what the other person is saying. 

There is NOTHING dishonest in ANY of my comments nor did I lie about what you said. Just stop. 

Oh and BTFW, since I fully understand the concept of the term straw man fallacy, it's not a matter of what I believe, it's about what I know.  

You should be ashamed of yourself. Seriously.

You should make an attempt to avoid continuously devolving to unfounded personal comments. Seriously. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
5.2.22  Gordy327  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.21    5 years ago
 As to the economy, it’s all on Biden’s watch now.  

Yeah, after Trump royally screwed it up! And the investment losses of investors and companies only hurts the economy in the long run. Of course, some are too short sighted or vindictive to see that.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.2.23  Tacos!  replied to  Dulay @5.2.20    5 years ago

Ah, more of the pointless trolling game.

Me: Then you should be able to quote me saying so. But you haven't because you can't. Because I didn't say it. You are dishonestly trying to attribute something to me I did not say.
You: I did.

You quoted me saying that that one side does it but the other side doesn't? Where?

Do you deny that your comment implied that ONE side 'throws' 'anger, hate, and disrespect' at the other side?

No I don't. But that doesn't say anything about it going in the other direction. I was only commenting on this story, not all possible stories.

Three days later and you have yet to address the FACT that is NOT a one way street.

Because there hasn't been a reason to. It's not the topic I was addressing.

There is NOTHING dishonest in ANY of my comments nor did I lie about what you said. Just stop.

I'll stop when you stop lying about the content of my comments and when you also let me speak for myself instead of trying to attach meaning to my words that aren't there. And it goes on even after you have already been told you are wrong. 

This nonsense is all rooted in your embarrassingly feeble attempt at whataboutism. What about the other side? What about the other side? Blah blah blah. Hey, if you want to talk about the other side, that's on you. Go ahead! It's not my responsibility to express your perspective for you. I was talking about one facet of this seed that I felt like commenting on. I don't also need to think of whatever the hell Dulay might want to say.

If you have a different perspective, just say it! If you want to make a point, don't try to drag it out of me. Be an adult and say it yourself. Stand up for what you believe. If you think it's important to say that Texas or the South generally - or whoever - hates anyone then JUST. SAY. SO. Don't harass me to make your point of view for you.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
5.2.24  Dulay  replied to  Tacos! @5.2.23    5 years ago

Supercilious whining bullshit. jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.3  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @5    5 years ago
I hear all the time about how awful these people are. I hear all the time about what a burden they are on the rest of the country.

If that's the case, you must be hanging out with a very negative crowd.

Maybe its time to get some new friends-- you'd be surprised how many positive people there are in the world! :-)

(P.S: Its easier than you think-- the people I hang with are very positive-- never sit around whining about Texas-- or anything else.)

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.3.1  Tacos!  replied to  Krishna @5.3    5 years ago

I didn't say it was anyone I was hanging out with. I was thinking of this very site. I see it all the time.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Participates
6  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    5 years ago

Kyle Biedermann is a total ding-dong.

Biedermann-Kyle.png?1548641832

He thought dressing up as Gay Hitler was a good idea on Halloween. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.1  Tacos!  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @6    5 years ago
He thought dressing up as Gay Hitler was a good idea on Halloween.

Actually gay Hitler sounds kind of appealing. He probably would have been way less of an asshole.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @6.1    5 years ago
Actually gay Hitler sounds kind of appealing.

Springtime for Hitler?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.1.2  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @6.1.1    5 years ago

Actually gay Hitler sounds kind of appealing

Springtime for Hitler?

From "The Producers":

Springtime for Hitler: A Gay Romp With Adolf and Eva at Berchtesgaden is a fictional musical in Mel Brooks's 1967 film The Producers,[1] as well as the stage musical adaptation of the movie,[2] and the 2005 movie adaptation of the musical. It is a musical about Adolf Hitler, written by Franz Liebkind, an unbalanced ex-Nazi played by Kenneth Mars (then by Brad Oscar and Will Ferrell in the stage musical and the 2005 film respectively).

In the film, the play is chosen by the producer Max Bialystock and his accountant Leo Bloom in their fraudulent scheme to raise substantial funding by selling 25,000% of a play, then causing it to fail, and finally keeping all of the remaining money for themselves. To ensure that the play is a total failure, Max selects an incredibly tasteless script (which he describes as "practically a love letter to Adolf Hitler"), and hires the worst director he can find (Roger DeBris), a stereotypical homosexual and transvestite caricature. He casts an out-of-control hippie named Lorenzo St. Dubois, also known by his initials "L.S.D.",[3] in the role of Hitler (after he had wandered into the wrong theatre by mistake during the casting call – "That's our Hitler!").

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Krishna @6.1.1    5 years ago

Good call.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.2  CB  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @6    5 years ago

Gasp! Who are those queens and what the "H" is this about? Tell me more.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Participates
6.2.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  CB @6.2    5 years ago
Gasp! Who are those queens and what the "H" is this about? Tell me more.

From the article:

State Rep. Kyle Biedermann (R) filed legislation this week seeking to put the question of a “Texit” — a process by which the Lone Star state would become the Lone Star nation — to voters.

Called House Bill 1359, which is also known as the Texas Independence Referendum Act, the legislation called for a statewide ballot in November asking voters if they want to remain part of the United States or “establish an independent republic.”

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
6.2.3  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.2.2    5 years ago

Idle threats be damned, nevertheless. We want Trump supporters to just go already somewhere - anywhere else. That's the thing. We're stuck on each other. So we can continue to play foolish 'war' games with each other (Red/Blue), while Russia cheers or we can get our collective shit together and make life better for the whole damn lot of us!

That is, Trump supporters won't be allowed to be happy until liberals and secularists are allowed to be happy! I hope y'all got that!

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
7  Hallux    5 years ago
So first Britain did Brexit, then Western Canada came up with Wexit and now Texas wants to Texit. So many lemmings, so few cliffs.
 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
7.1  Split Personality  replied to  Hallux @7    5 years ago

Welcome back to the show that never ends.

Glad to see you.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Split Personality @7.1    5 years ago

Good to see you also!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Hallux @7    5 years ago

Wexit didn't go anywhere, but what about Quebexit?  That was serious. 

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
8  SteevieGee    5 years ago

Anticipating what they (rightfully) believe will become the most socialist-leaning administration since Great Britain ruled the colonies, conservatives in Texas are not planning on ‘waiting out’ Joe Biden’s term.

Wait...  We were socialists while we were British colonies?  We didn't even have public schools.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
8.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  SteevieGee @8    5 years ago

Yeah, Steve, I caught that, too. I just rolled my eyes. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
8.2  Split Personality  replied to  SteevieGee @8    5 years ago

Gov Abbott threatens legal action against Biden admin

Governor Greg Abbott Thursday held a roundtable discussion in Odessa with energy workers, leaders, and advocates on how Texas can continue to support the energy industry and its workers.

Following the roundtable, the Governor held a press conference where he issued an Executive Order to protect Texas' energy industry from what he referred to as the federal overreach of the Biden Administration. The Governor also announced his support for legislation that will prohibit cities from banning natural gas appliances.

In the order Abbott wrote that President Biden 'signaled extreme hostility' towards the energy industry and Texas by rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and pushing Green New Deal policies. Abbott read aloud the executive order that called for "every state agency to use all lawful powers and tools to challenge any federal action that threatens the continued strength, vitality and independence of the energy industry."

Abbott compared this new plan of dealing with a Democratic President to when he was Attorney General and sued the Obama Administration 31 times. "Texas will continue with that litigation strategy to fight back against any efforts by the Biden Administration that threaten either the energy sector in general, or jobs in the energy sector, in particular in Texas," said Governor Abbott.

"The men and women who work in the energy industry produce the affordable energy that powers our lives and they are vital to the Texas economy," said Abbott. "Texas is a pro-energy state, and we will not sit idly by and allow the Biden administration or local governments to destroy jobs and raise energy costs for Texas families. My Executive Order will help ensure that the federal government cannot take away the livelihoods of Texans who work so hard to provide our state and our nation with the energy we need." Gov Abbott threatens legal action against Biden admin (msn.com)

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
8.2.2  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @8.2.1    5 years ago

Fight if you must. It's all good! "The Struggle Continues. . . .old man."  Valuable life spend on weak, specious arguments that won't matter a whole heap when all is said and done.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
9  Split Personality    5 years ago
Texit has backers.

just not the GOP or Democrats, lol.

"America needs Texas to lead, not secede," Texas Republican Party Chairman Allen West said in a statement to Insider.

...

"It is certainly understandable that people are frustrated with the situation after months of a pandemic and concerns they may have about the integrity of the election, but the solution isn't to dissolve or detach from the greatest nation in history," Republican House Speaker Dennis Bonnen told Insider. "Instead, Texas needs to take care of Texas and continue to lead the nation by example with legislation that continues to pursue economic strength and freedom."

...

State Democrats have similarly shut down the idea, according to The Dallas Morning News .

"You can't claim to be patriotic and file a bill for Texas to secede from the union," Abhi Rahman, a spokesperson for the Texas Democratic Party, told the newspaper

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
10  Buzz of the Orient    5 years ago

Since there are members here who call Biden "China Joe" and some who criticize everything China does, I wonder if they should be given a big dose of it, and have Biden put all the Texans in "re-education camps" to Americanize them.  You know, take away all their weapons, train them how to make an honest living, and to speak American, etc. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
10.2  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @10    5 years ago

Trump supporters love it when they hear such words. . . it is like 'oxygenated' brain food they can sponge off of for effect. China is the new "boogey-men," because Donald Trump took Russia off the table. Good old "cult of personality" himself strikes again!

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
10.2.1  Gordy327  replied to  CB @10.2    5 years ago
it is like 'oxygenated' brain food they can sponge off of for effect.

More like brain poison. 

 
 

Who is online

Trout Giggles


79 visitors