╌>

Chaos Grows under Biden leadership

  
By:  Vic Eldred  •  3 years ago  •  230 comments


Chaos Grows under Biden leadership
The threat is nearly invisible in ordinary ways. It is a crisis of confidence. It is a crisis that strikes at the very heart and soul and spirit of our national will. We can see this crisis in the growing doubt about the meaning of our own lives and in the loss of a unity of purpose for our nation.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

Consumer prices are rising, the Stock Market is finally tanking, businesses can't find workers because they have been incentivized not to work, there are now gas lines on east coast and the price of gas is in $3 per gallon territory. We all know about the unmitigated disaster on the southern border, as the nation becomes swamped with illegal migrants. There is also a new war in the middle east and one of our important gas lines has been shut down by hackers. Crime is skyrocketing in big blue cities as cops resign in droves. Move over Jimmy Carter, Joe Biden is at the helm.

The "president" has been reluctant to talk about it. The lying media (both traditional & social) continues to cover for him. As he put it recently "I'm not supposed to be answering all these questions."  Maybe we should direct our questions to Bernie Sanders or Susan Rice?  Where is the msm? They seem to be obsessed with Liz Cheney. I suppose that is better than talking about the crisis caused by the man who was so intent on undoing everything Donald Trump did. Which brings us to the fickle swine who voted for Biden because they didn't like the way Trump talked. You are all responsible for this. You were made fools of by the vermin who christened themselves "progressives", (not to be confused with the original Progressives of American history). So you never cared about deeds (policy), it was only about Trump's hurtful words? This is what you voted for instead: inflation, joblessness, a bear market, crime & violence and another middle east crisis.



The word to describe it comes from the 1970's - "a malaise."


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

As somebody famous once said: "elections have consequences!"

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.1  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago
The "president" has been reluctant to talk about it.

What 'it' do you mean Vic? 

The lying media (both traditional & social) continues to cover for him.

Please post an example. 

As he put it recently "I'm not supposed to be answering all these questions."  Maybe we should direct our questions to Bernie Sanders or Susan Rice?  Where is the msm?

What Biden ACTUALLY said was:

"You guys are bad. I’m not supposed to be answering all these questions. I’m supposed to leave, but I can’t resist your questions."

Biden said that at the end of a press conference about the Covid vaccine, after a question about his meeting with Congressional leadership about the infrastructure bill. He then returned to the lectern and answered the question. 

Your seed is rife with utter bullshit Vic.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @1.1    3 years ago
Your seed is rife with utter bullshit Vic.  

LMAO!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    3 years ago
LMAO!

What 'it' do you mean Vic? 

Please post an example. 

Or is this going to be ANOTHER of your seeds in which you avoid answering questions at all costs and refuse to support your proclamations? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @1.1.2    3 years ago
What 'it' do you mean Vic? 

It being any of the above crisis situations.


Please post an example.

The most egregious would be the southern border, where Biden put his vp in charge, only to never address or visit the border and referred questions to his lying secretary of homeland security, who keeps claiming "the border is closed." Biden himself has not addressed the border crisis.


Or is this going to be ANOTHER of your seeds in which you avoid answering questions at all costs and refuse to support your proclamations? 

You mean where I have to offer up proof for every word I say as if I were dealing with Saul Alinsky?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @1.1    3 years ago

What else is new?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.1.5  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.3    3 years ago
It being any of the above crisis situations.

So you can't cite anything specific. Got ya. 

The most egregious would be the southern border, where Biden put his vp in charge, only to never address or visit the border and referred questions to his lying secretary of homeland security, who keeps claiming "the border is closed." Biden himself has not addressed the border crisis.

WTF does all that blather have to do with your allegation that the media is covering for Biden Vic? Do try to keep up. 

You mean where I have to offer up proof for every word I say as if I were dealing with Saul Alinsky?

No I mean your MO of ignoring questions and posting proclamations while refusing to support them. Just like this one. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @1.1.5    3 years ago

he cited specifics.

He can't understand them FOR you.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.1.7  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.6    3 years ago

That's ridiculous. Nothing that Vic cited is a crisis Tex. Paleo-conservatives sure freak out easily. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @1.1.7    3 years ago

Thank you for the daily entertainment.

jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @1.1.7    3 years ago

Neo-neanderthals

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.10    3 years ago

Bingo!

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
1.2  shona1  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

Evening Vic.. now an educated and well spoken person such as yourself, would have had to of cringed with what Trump said at times.

Any normal logical thinking person would have sat there and said...What!!!! Geez we did..The one that sticks in my mind was after the election that he was going to win..the virus will all but disappear...have not seen the latest figures over there from the virus... they stopped reporting it here....

Things in the USA look pretty normal to me ..usual crimes, occasional riots, shootings, political dramas  etc...as for wars, always has been and always will be..that unfortunately is human nature...let them get on with it.

Geez you mob are lucky..$3 for a gallon of petrol...hell we pay $1.60 a litre so multiple that by nearly 4. Last I heard NZ is paying $2.10 a litre.

Sometimes Vic you need to be grateful for what you have and where you live...it may not be a bed of roses, no where is but you are a lot better off than many.

Why waste brain cells on bloody politicians...they really don't give a stuff about the likes of you and me... regardless of what they say..

They are to busy with their snouts in the pig trough and calculating their pensions... ever seen a poor hard up ex President?? It is no different here.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
1.2.1  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  shona1 @1.2    3 years ago
Why waste brain cells on bloody politicians...they really don't give a stuff about the likes of you and me... regardless of what they say.. They are to busy with their snouts in the pig trough and calculating their pensions... ever seen a poor hard up ex President?? It is no different here.

YOU ARE SO RIGHT ON! jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

Yep, I did that for emphasis! Politicians don't give a rat's tiny ass in regard to anyone outside of their personal little circle.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Ronin2  replied to  shona1 @1.2    3 years ago

Trump is no excuse for Biden's piss poor job performance.

As for the rest. In case you missed the last 5 years of left wing TDS driven lunacy. Calling out a sitting president for being a piece of human garbage is the norm for this country. So again, there is no excuse for Biden.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.2.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.2    3 years ago

Trump did such a great job that his approval ratings rarely got out of the 30 percentile.  Right now Biden is at 60 plus percentile.  Going by the numbers, it is not Biden but Trump who had a piss pour jp.  Trump threw so much mud at people that if mud slinging were an Olympic event, he would bring home the gold.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2.2    3 years ago

But President Biden isn't a human piece of garbage, trumpturd is.  

You forgot 'leftist brown shirts'.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
1.2.5  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.4    3 years ago
But President Biden isn't a human

I didn't think he was either. Good to know you agree with me for a change. 

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
1.3  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

Have you thought of opening a hate card division at Hallmark? Maybe you should concentrate more on A.O.C. as a deflection while Liz wields her broom.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

A great well written and right on article.  Well done. jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.5  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

Leadership? Is that what they call what he’s doing in the White House?  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.5.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.5    3 years ago

Some of our worst fears in about 5 months.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    3 years ago

Gee, I wonder if businesses are having trouble finding workers because of the over 500,000 dead thanks to whatshisname and how many sick??

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2    3 years ago

No, they are having trouble because people can make more by sitting at home thanks to Joe Biden, or should I say Bernie Sanders?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    3 years ago

That's not true.  You can't make more money sitting at home, thanks to President Biden.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.1    3 years ago
You can't make more money sitting at home

Here you go again:

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.3  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    3 years ago
Here you go again:

Yes and AGAIN, the link you try to pretend supports your rant about Biden was published in 2020 during Trump's reign. 

ANOTHER fail Vic. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @2.1.3    3 years ago

Dulay, even his putrid press secretary told the nation that we don't like him answering questions as in any place, anytime and on any issue!




Yes, you've done it again. You're wearing egg on your face!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    3 years ago

No, Dulay is always correct.  Your sources never show what you claim they show.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.5    3 years ago
No, Dulay is always correct. 

She is our very own "wordsmith" don't ya know.


Your sources never show what you claim they show.

You mean the links I provide as opposed to the ones you don't?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.6    3 years ago

When I provide a link they are truthful and factual and claim what I claimed they claim.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.8  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    3 years ago
Dulay, even his putrid press secretary told the nation that we don't like him answering questions as in any place, anytime and on any issue!
Yes, you've done it again. You're wearing egg on your face!

I'm no longer surprised by your deflections and pretense of 'WINNING!' Vic. It's just a continued note from a sad trombone. 

You truncated Biden's statement to try to make a point that doesn't exist without your disingenuous practice. Then you deflect to a link that actually refutes your posit. 

Your claim about what Psaki said is FALSE. All anyone need do is READ YOUR link to prove it to themselves. Why do you post links that prove that your comments are utter fabrication Vic? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @2.1.8    3 years ago

"Your claim about what Psaki said is FALSE. All anyone need do is READ YOUR link to prove it to themselves. Why do you post links that prove that your comments are utter fabrication Vic?"

Again, Ya!  Every single time!!!!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1.10  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.7    3 years ago

You never post any links even when asked. 

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
2.1.11  GregTx  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.10    3 years ago

Or reads the ones supplied.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.12  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.6    3 years ago
She is our very own "wordsmith" don't ya know.

You label me with that term all the time Vic. It surprises me that you insist on acknowledging that I am a skilled user of words so often. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3  Tessylo    3 years ago

"Crime is skyrocketing in big blue cities as cops resign in droves."

Which 'big blue cities' are those?  Proof?  Proof that the cops are resigning in droves?  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3    3 years ago
Proof?

You've heard of CNN, right?

Here you go:




This is not some hidden secret. It's common knowledge!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    3 years ago

None of those places - the 3 places named - were 'big blue cities'.  Excuse me, 4.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.2  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    3 years ago
This is not some hidden secret. It's common knowledge!

Yes and it's no secret that it started under the former guy.

So dumping it in Biden's lap is obtuse and disingenuous Vic.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @3.1.2    3 years ago
Yes and it's no secret that it started under the former guy.

What did?  The leftist rioting & violence in blue cities?????

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.4  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.3    3 years ago
What did?  The leftist rioting & violence in blue cities?????

Why the obtuse comment Vic? Follow the thread. It starts with a block quote from YOUR seed which claims:

"Crime is skyrocketing in big blue cities as cops resign in droves."

You then link an article from JUNE of 2020. In short, you are disingenuously blaming Biden for events that occurred during Trump's reign. The only way your claim couldn't be labeled as hypocritical is if you could link a seed that you published decrying cops resigning in droves in JUNE of last year. 

Oh and BTFW, you've posted NO evidence that crime is skyrocketing ANYWHERE. That is just another one of your unsubstantiated and unfounded proclamations. 

 
 
 
FortunateSon
Freshman Silent
3.1.5  FortunateSon  replied to  Dulay @3.1.2    3 years ago

True enough. BLM and antifa started under the former democrat....   obama

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @3.1.4    3 years ago

And the crime rate took off after the police departments were emasculated by blue state governors & mayors. The two things are related, don't ya know!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  FortunateSon @3.1.5    3 years ago

He brought BLM into the White House. Then we had all those cops murdered.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.6    3 years ago

You have provided proof of nothing.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.9  Dulay  replied to  FortunateSon @3.1.5    3 years ago

Relevance? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.10  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.6    3 years ago

Another proclamation. 

Prove it Vic. Post a link that actually supports your claim. However I would suggest that you READ any link before you post it since every link that you have posted so far refutes your own posit. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @3.1.10    3 years ago
"Another proclamation.  Prove it Vic. Post a link that actually supports your claim. However I would suggest that you READ any link before you post it since every link that you have posted so far refutes your own posit."

Ya!  EVERY SINGLE TIME!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.12  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.8    3 years ago

He never does.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.13  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.6    3 years ago

You've had all day Vic. WHERE is your proof that crime rates took off. You've made the claim more than once. PROVE it. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
3.1.14  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.6    3 years ago
after the police departments were emasculated by blue state governors & mayors

When did they do that?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @3.1.13    3 years ago

You are the one that trapped yourself. You say crime rates didn't go up. Who among your friends is honest enough to stand up for the facts that EVERYONE knows?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.16  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Thomas @3.1.14    3 years ago
When did they do that?

Oh you know, when the people who share that rotten ideology were rioting for over a year.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.17  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.15    3 years ago
You are the one that trapped yourself. You say crime rates didn't go up.

That is a LIE Vic. I have NOT opined on crime rates. I have merely tried to get YOU to prove YOUR proclamation that crime rates 'took off' because police have left the job. You have FAILED to do so. 

Who among your friends is honest enough to stand up for the facts that EVERYONE knows?

Who among YOUR friends can back up your proclamation Vic? As of yet, none have stepped up with a link to bail you out. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.18  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @3.1.17    3 years ago

Last year, the United States tallied more than 20,000 murders — the highest total since 1995  and 4,000 more than in 2019. Preliminary FBI data for 2020 points to a 25% surge in murders — the largest single year increase since the agency began publishing uniform data in 1960.

Policing is to blame, or rather the lack of it.

In the wake of the May and June unrest, public officials’ decisions and growing hostility toward policing left law enforcement demoralized, debilitated and, in some cases, defunded. Even the most dedicated officers who now face a greater risk of being sued, fired or prosecuted for doing their job feel pressure to pull back.

The message from a new wave of progressive prosecutors is clear: making arrests for drug and weapons crimes that will go unprosecuted exposes officers to the risk of disciplinary action, lawsuits and criminal prosecution. To mitigate that risk, police take a more passive approach.

Data shows a precipitous decline in law enforcement activity from last June through this February. We found that across the 10 major cities we studied, deadly violence rose as engaged policing fell. Cities that cut (or threaten to) police budgets often saw the largest drops in active policing and the increases in homicide.

After the George Floyd protests started in New York City, the New York Police Department logged 45,000 fewer arrests from June to December  — a 38% decline while the Big Apple added more than 100 additional homicides (a 58% increase) .

From June through the end of this February, Chicago’s police made 31,000 fewer arrests — a 53% decline as murders rose 65% . In Louisville, where massive unrest included the shooting of two police officers during a protest, homicides jumped 87% as the police made 35% fewer vehicle stops since June while arrests plummeted 42% during summer months compared with 2019 .

Read it all [ deleted Thanks ]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.19  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @3.1.17    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.20  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.18    3 years ago

Welcome back Jim.

If they read it, they'll only dismiss it. They were unable to prove the Steele Dossier's credibility and now they dismiss what is common knowledge.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.21  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.18    3 years ago

Good to see you, Jim!!!!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.22  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.18    3 years ago
comment removed for context [ph]

How sweet! 

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.23  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.19    3 years ago
Look to yourself when it comes to lying and denial.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.24  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.18    3 years ago

[deleted]

NOTHING in your link supports Vic's claim that crime rates 'took off' because police have left the job. In FACT, your link give an entirely DIFFERENT reason for the rise in crime: a failure in policing. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.25  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.1.24    3 years ago

Oh, no sane person could ever possibly link defunding the police and multiple protests with the number of police shrinking, thus lowering arrests.

No, THAT would just be too darn hard!

SMH

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.26  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @3.1.24    3 years ago
"NOTHING in your link supports Vic's claim that crime rates 'took off' because police have left the job. In FACT, your link give an entirely DIFFERENT reason for the rise in crime: a failure in policing."

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.giftypical

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.27  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.25    3 years ago
Oh, no sane person could ever possibly link defunding the police and multiple protests with the number of police shrinking, thus lowering arrests.

No, THAT would just be too darn hard!

SMH

Then DO IT Tex. Post a fucking link that does so. 

There is NOTHING in Jim's link about the 'number of police shrinking'. Not one fucking thing. 

It's ALL about cops failing to police. You should READ it. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.28  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.1.27    3 years ago

you are funny!

seems pretty easy to make the connection.

less officers, less arrests, more crime.

for God's sake. this isn't rocket science.

I prefer you to do your own research

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.29  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.25    3 years ago
Oh, no sane person could ever possibly link defunding the police and multiple protests with the number of police shrinking, thus lowering arrests.

So then be insane and post a link Tex. 

No, THAT would just be too darn hard!

When you state something as a fact, you should be able to support it. 

Vic has tried and failed miserably. In fact his link is from June and doesn't even cite a 'take off' in crime rates.

Jim tried to help but alas, his link was an utter failure too. In fact, in one of the links in his article, it states: 

Even as cities have faced financial shortfalls, local governments consistently spent an increasing  share of their general funds  on police ( despite repeated  research  showing that  increasing police funding  does not correlate to reduced crime ).

But now YOU want to insist that it's all been assumption, connecting non-existent dots and I should just accept your posit.  

Ridiculous. 

SMH

I doubt that will help but you and your buddies couldn't do much worse. Or can you? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.30  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.1.29    3 years ago
So then be insane and post a link Tex. 

No, I'll leave the insanity to you.

When you state something as a fact, you should be able to support it. 

Oops, so sorry, I m used to dealing with adults who can put two and two together. I don't have the patience or time to explain the mundane to anyone who is simply looking for an argument for argument's sake. But you have fun!

I doubt that will help but you and your buddies couldn't do much worse. Or can you?

Would you prefer pity?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.31  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.30    3 years ago
Oops, so sorry, I m used to dealing with adults who can put two and two together.

I'm used to dealing with adults who don't pull bullshit from their nether regions and are capable of backing up their posits. 

I don't have the patience or time to explain the mundane to anyone who is simply looking for an argument for argument's sake.

There's no argument here Tex. Vic, Jim and YOU made allegations that NONE of you can prove. I'm used to dealing with adults who admit when they are wrong. 

But you have fun!

It's always fun to watch y'all flail around for evidence to support your fabricated 'facts'. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.32  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.1.31    3 years ago

Amusing as ever!

Thanks for the laughs!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.33  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.32    3 years ago
Amusing as ever! Thanks for the laughs!

Obtuse and disingenuous as ever. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.34  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @3.1.33    3 years ago

What--MORE comedy gold?

LMAO!!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.35  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thomas @3.1.14    3 years ago

They didn't.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
3.1.36  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.16    3 years ago
Oh you know, when the people who share that rotten ideology were rioting for over a year.

Funny, I didn't see that at all. I think you're still conflating BLM protests with riots. Get back to me when you clear that up.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.37  Tessylo  replied to  Thomas @3.1.36    3 years ago
"Oh you know, when the people who share that rotten ideology were rioting for over a year."
"Funny, I didn't see that at all. I think you're still conflating BLM protests with riots. Get back to me when you clear that up."

Don't hold your breath.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4  Tessylo    3 years ago

So how is the cyber hackers hacking the pipeline President Biden's fault??

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4    3 years ago

Killing the already agreed to Keystone Pipeline was his fault. Gas prices were already heading to $3 under Biden. He owns it, Tess.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    3 years ago

The Keystone Pipeline?  You're still talking about that?

And no, President Biden had nothing to do with that.  You act like Keystone was going to over endless jobs to anyone that wanted one.  Nonsense!

THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH TODAY'S SHORTAGES.  PEOPLE ARE SCARED BECAUSE OF THE CYBER HACKERS HACKING THE PIPELINE AND ARE RUNNING OUT AND BUYING GAS BECAUSE OF THAT.

HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE, NOTHING

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    3 years ago

There it is, the emotion driven response from the Biden supporters in big letters, instead of reason or facts.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    3 years ago

No, I provided facts.  Nothing emotion driven here.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.3    3 years ago

As you always do!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    3 years ago

Plus none of the oil from the Keystone Pipelines was going to the states in the first place so again, Keystone pipeline has nothing to do with ANYTHING.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.4    3 years ago

You should follow my example and provide relevant current facts.  

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
4.1.7  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.3    3 years ago
No, I provided facts. 

Where?

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
4.1.8  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    3 years ago

Actually, she is right.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Thomas @4.1.8    3 years ago

"Actually, she is right."

Of course I am.  See how that was never disputed?  Comment 4.1.5?  Not disputed!

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
4.1.10  Gazoo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    3 years ago

Gas started going up here immediately after dipshit took office. Coincidence? I don’t know but it’s gone up .85 to .90 cents per gallon. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
4.1.11  MrFrost  replied to  Gazoo @4.1.10    3 years ago

And what policy decisions did trump make to drive up the price of gas? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.12  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Gazoo @4.1.10    3 years ago

He is like a human wrecking ball. Trump had the US become a self reliant energy producer. Biden comes in and reverses everything that Trump did and kills the Keystone Pipeline. Now it's about implementing that "green new deal." How many people do you know who own electric cars?  How many charging stations do you see?  Maybe it's not yet time to cancel fossil fuels?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.12    3 years ago

Why do you keep spreading that dis/mis/information about Keystone pipeline?  That oil was going elsewhere to be refined and processed.  IT WAS NEVER FOR USE IN THE U.S.  The former 'president' did not make the US become a self-reliant energy producer.

THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE HACKERS/THERE WAS NO SHORTAGE OF GAS.

THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING.

YOU ACT AS THOUGH THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE WAS GOING TO OFFER ENDLESS JOBS TO EVERYONE IN THE U.S. THAT WANTED ONE.  THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY FEW PERMANENT JOBS FOR ANYONE IN THE US

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.14  Tessylo  replied to  Gazoo @4.1.10    3 years ago

That has nothing to do with President Biden

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.13    3 years ago

But, we sure could use it now!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.16  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.14    3 years ago

Sorry, you all got him into the White House and the buck stops there!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.17  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    3 years ago

So it's not his fault, at all, in no way, shape, or form.

Thanks for admitting that!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.18  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.15    3 years ago

Sure could use what now?

So again, you admit Keystone Pipeline has nothing to do with President Biden or the alleged shortages.

Good!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.19  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.16    3 years ago

Thank goodness for President Biden!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Funny how with the prior 'president' the buck never stopped there.  It went right into his pockets.  

Funny how the prior 'president' was blameless for EVERYTHING and now President Biden is responsible for EVERYTHING that happened because of the incompetent/impotent turd #45.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
4.1.20  MrFrost  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.14    3 years ago

That has nothing to do with President Biden

When he said, "dipshit" I assumed he was talking about trump. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
4.1.21  Gazoo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.12    3 years ago

“Now it's about implementing that "green new deal."”

more like the green pipe dream. We are no where ready for the move to ev’s. They are still too costly. Charging times are still way to long. More importantly, the infrastructure isn’t even minutely close to being in place and the grid can’t handle it. And what happens to the cost of electricity when the majority moves to ev’s? And will it be any cleaner than it is now? Renewable energy is a catchy, but empty phrase. It is undependable. Pv panels work 12 hrs out of a 24 hr day and when it’s cloudy output is greatly diminished. Wind turbines only work when the wind is blowing. But hey, let’s jump right in to the great depression times 10.

“How many people do you know who own electric cars?“

none, lol. I see them once in a while but that’s it. As far as charging stations there is one at the local walmart. Not to say it can’t be done but we have a very long way to go to be off our reliance to fossil fuels.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.22  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Gazoo @4.1.21    3 years ago

You've got it my friend!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
4.1.23  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    3 years ago

We are not short on fuels.  What we are short of is qualified fuel tanker drivers.  When the pandemic hit, consumer use was way down so many qualified drivers left or retired due to little to no deliveries.  The schools who train these drivers shut down also.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.24  Tessylo  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4.1.23    3 years ago

Thanks for the facts!

No fuel shortages.

No relation to the Keystone Pipeline.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.1.25  Ronin2  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4.1.23    3 years ago

Actually the shortage of drivers started way before the pandemic.

During the past 15 years, the trucking industry has struggled with a shortage of truck drivers.
1
The shortfall was first documented in a 2005 report. At that time, the shortage was roughly
20,000. During the Great Recession that started in 2008, the driver shortage was erased, but only
because industry volumes plummeted, resulting in fewer drivers needed. However, as industry
volumes began to recover in 2011, the shortage slowly returned. The driver market continued
to tighten, and the shortage skyrocketed to roughly 50,700 by 2017. In 2018, the industry
suffered a greater shortage, largely due to robust industry freight volumes. As this report
highlights, the driver shortfall is expected to fall slightly by the end of 2019 from a combination
of slower economic growth and a small bump in supply.
2 However, the combination of a tight
labor market and an aging truck driver population is expected to keep the shortage near its peak
in 2018.
There are many reasons for the current driver shortage, but one of the largest factors is the
relatively high average age of the existing workforce. According to surveys by ATA, the average
driver age in the for-hire over-the-road truckload industry is 46. Other trucking sectors have an
even higher average age, like less-than-truckload and private carriers. While the driver shortage
is not as acute in these sectors as it is in the over-the-road truckload sector, the high average age
still affects the overall shortage. As these two groups see drivers retire, they often go into the
for-hire truckload labor pool to recruit drivers.
Additionally, the industry has historically struggled to attract all segments of the population as
just 6.6% of truck drivers in 2018 were women. This percentage hasn’t changed much historically,
ranging from 4.5% to 6.6% over the last 18 years. In 2018, 40.4% of drivers were minorities, which
has jumped 13.8 percentage points from 26.6% in 2001.3
Today, motor carriers4 struggle to find enough qualified drivers, which makes the impact of the
shortage seem much worse than the numbers in this report. Many carriers, despite being short
drivers, are highly selective in hiring drivers because they have made safety and professionalism
high priorities. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.26  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @4.1.25    3 years ago

So what?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5  Tessylo    3 years ago

"There is also a new wat in the middle east and one of our important gas lines has been shut down by hackers."  That's President Biden's fault how??

What's a wat??

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Tessylo @5    3 years ago

It's a character in the movie "A Knight's Tale".

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @5    3 years ago
That's President Biden's fault how??

Did he not restore aid to the Palestinians?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2    3 years ago

Has nothing to do with it anyway.

Also, the Palestinians have a right to live, not just the Israelis.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.1    3 years ago
Who are the fools here?

So they say - on campus.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6  Tessylo    3 years ago

Which brings us to the fickle swine who voted for Biden because they didn't like the way Trump talked. You are all responsible for this. You were made fools of by the vermin who christened themselves "progressives", (not to be confused with the original Progressives of American history). So you never cared about deeds (policy), it was only about Trump's hurtful words? This is what you voted for instead: inflation, joblessness, a bear market, crime & violence and another middle east crisis.

This is quite hateful.  Who wrote this hateful trash?

What trump policy?

So trump only uttered hurtful words??

We didn't like the way trump talked?

We didn't like anything about trump.

Talk about deflection and denial. . . . .serious, serious denial and serious, serious deflection.   

Who are the fools here?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6    3 years ago
This is quite hateful.  Who wrote this hateful trash?

It happens to be true and somebody has to stand up for the truth.


What trump policy?

The same one you always ask about and that I always waste my time detailing for you.


So trump only uttered hurtful words??

Yup, as did George Patton, Curtis LeMay and William Tecumseh Sherman


We didn't like the way trump talked?

The "we" in the article would be moderates & independents. As for progressives, I'm guessing you also hated his policies and America in general.


We didn't like anything about trump.

Apparently not.


Who are the fools here?

The moderates, independents and some Republicans who voted for Biden. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1    3 years ago

"The "we" in the article would be moderates & independents. As for progressives, I'm guessing you also hated his policies and America in general."

So who wrote this hateful trash?

Once again you've put words in my mouth.   Stop that.

Whatshisname had no policies.  Only hate.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.1    3 years ago

If you see it that way, it obviously needed to be written.

You are very welcome!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.2    3 years ago

So who wrote this hateful trash?

You still haven't answered.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.2    3 years ago

I don't know why such hateful trash is allowed to stand.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.4    3 years ago

How ironic, coming from you of all people!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.5    3 years ago

So, are you calling me hateful trash?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.6    3 years ago

You know I don't do that. I allow the readers to be the judge.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
6.1.8  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.6    3 years ago

Why would anyone want yo insult hurtful trash like that?

 
 
 
MonsterMash
Sophomore Quiet
6.1.9  MonsterMash  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.6    3 years ago
So, are you calling me hateful trash?

Hey, if the shoe fits !

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
7  Hal A. Lujah    3 years ago

I love how the photo that accompanies this article is an empty gas pump - as if Joe Biden is out there sending sending ransomware to US companies.  That is so plainly opportunistic that it perfectly describes the level of intellect of the target audience for this type of trashy article.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7    3 years ago

I love how the photo that accompanies this article is an empty gas pump 

Kind of symbolic of the Biden administration!


he level of intellect of the target audience for this type of trashy article.

Well, It seems to have attracted you.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    3 years ago

We like to provide the truth.  

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
7.1.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    3 years ago

Well, It seems to have attracted you.

Certainly not to read it.  I am attracted to opportunities to point at absurdity, and the photo alone was all it took.  Congrats.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.1.2    3 years ago

As your avatar demonstrates.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
7.1.4  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.1    3 years ago

Since when ?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  author  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

They   cut off a pipeline   to the Eastern Seaboard for days, tried to poison a   Florida water-treatment   plant, held hospital IT systems hostage and stole an undetermined trove of information in the   SolarWinds   hack – all as the Biden administration searches for a way to respond.

Cyberattacks   are on the rise, and they’re increasingly targeting major infrastructure installations, like transportation hubs, energy facilities and utility companies.

The technology to prevent many of these attacks already exists, experts say, and hacks targeting critical infrastructure, which can threaten American lives, are akin to acts of war.

So   President Biden   signed an   executive order   Wednesday to strengthen U.S. cyberdefenses and bolster the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, known as CISA.
"U.S. public and private sector entities increasingly face sophisticated malicious cyber activity from both nation-state actors and cyber criminals," the  White House  said in a statement. "These incidents share commonalities, including insufficient cybersecurity defenses that leave public and private sector entities more vulnerable to incidents."
Biden’s executive actions would likely require federal agencies and contractors to meet minimum cybersecurity protocols – but that doesn’t go nearly far enough, according to former  Rep. Denver Riggleman , R-Va., who spent 20 years in intelligence for the military, the National Security Agency and in private industry.

"We need to pick the first country that f---- with us in a cyber way and bring them to their knees," he told Fox News Wednesday.

His solution is dramatically ramping up spending for offensive cyber capabilities, and then using them disproportionately in response to any future attacks, especially when they are linked to the governments of Russia, China, Iran or North Korea.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
8.1  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    3 years ago
all as the Biden administration searches for a way to respond.

Well gee Vic, al least you acknowledge that Biden intends to respond, unlike Trump, who gave Russia and Putin a pass every chance he got. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
9  JBB    3 years ago

Then how to explain Biden's soaring 63% approval?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @9    3 years ago

We shall find out if that's real or not in a matter of roughly 2 years. Mailing out money to people is one thing, a general malaise is another.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
9.1.1  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1    3 years ago

original

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @9.1.1    3 years ago

When you don't have a comeback, poster is always the next best thing.

We call it the Bronx special!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
9.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @9.1.1    3 years ago
afb051221dAPR20210512044508.jpg
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.2    3 years ago

He's bringing back those teen beat style magazines for teenage girls, but instead of putting posters of David Cassidy up, he's moved onto Joe Biden. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @9.1.3    3 years ago

I love it!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.4    3 years ago

Oh yes, Biden is so much more photogenic. Let's give Biden credit for one thing - he may be the only man who looks ok in a designer suit. (you need stick legs!)

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.6    3 years ago

Sounds like jealousy.  #45 looks like shit in anything he wears.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
9.1.8  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.2    3 years ago

That burn you are feeling about Biden's 63% approval rating is what I call a "Bronx Special".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @9.1.8    3 years ago

Let's give him the "Bronx Cheer"

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
9.1.10  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.6    3 years ago

You are so right! Trump never has looked good in his $17,000 designer suits. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
9.1.11  Raven Wing  replied to  Dulay @9.1.10    3 years ago
Trump never has looked good in his $17,000 designer suits. 

Fat is fat, and in Trump's case, clothes does not make the man. Trump is just a blubbery fat hog no matter how much his clothing costs.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
9.1.12  Dulay  replied to  Raven Wing @9.1.11    3 years ago

I'm old enough to remember the Jackie Gleason show. That man was HUGE but he looked GREAT in a well tailored suit. Yet Trump always look frumpy.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Raven Wing @9.1.11    3 years ago

The clothes the fat pig wears are even bigger than him (with shoulder pads) to make the big fat pig appear not to be such a big fat pig.  Doesn't work.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.14  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @9.1.12    3 years ago

With his alleged billions you'd think he'd find himself a decent tailor.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
9.1.15  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.2    3 years ago

I thought a Bronx special was a good hot dog and an egg cream.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.1.16  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @9.1.8    3 years ago

That seems to be your answer to everything. How long do you think it will take for people to look beyond the money he is giving away?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
9.1.17  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.16    3 years ago

As opposed to the money Trump stole from his own supporters?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @9    3 years ago

What's the highest the former occupant got, 35%?

That 63% is probably low for President Biden!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
9.2.1  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @9.2    3 years ago

And you are wrong again. Are you tired of being wrong all the time?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
10  JohnRussell    3 years ago
So you never cared about deeds (policy), it was only about Trump's hurtful words?

The seeded article is delusional. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @10    3 years ago

That's quite a comeback. If that's all you got, I must have nailed it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1    3 years ago

How do think people feel about those who voted for #45?  You call us fickle swine and vermin.  What do you think we think of those who voted for him?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @10.1.1    3 years ago
You call us fickle swine and vermin.

Are you a progressive?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
10.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1    3 years ago

Your belief that Donald Trump was very popular based on his wonderful "policies" but only lost some votes because of his "loud mouth" is delusional Vic. 

Trump had very few, if any, policies that commanded majority support. Just because you and other extreme rightists like something doesnt mean the majority of Americans do. 

But even beyond the narrow topic of "policies" Trump has destroyed any hope for "unity" in this country, with thousands of lies, a corrupt administration, startling personal ignorance of issues, his constant anti-science outlook, his cozying up to white supremacists, his traitorous conduct viv a vis Ukraine, and his lies about the 2020 election which directly encouraged the riot at the Capitol Building. And a thousand other things. 

Your article is totally delusional. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.2    3 years ago

I'm a LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVE/DEMOCRAT.
I choose to live in today not an alternate reality/a past that never was.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.3    3 years ago

Ya, exactly right John, as usual!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
10.1.6  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @10.1.4    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
10.1.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.3    3 years ago
policies that commanded majority support.

He had to stack the deck or get shut down.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.3    3 years ago
Trump had very few, if any, policies that commanded majority support.

Really?  Let us consider a key voting group. A lot of the experts point to him losing suburban women as a contributing factor to the loss in 2020. Let us try to determine what those women were voting on. Was it his demeanor or was it his policies?   The consequences of the 2020 election looms large for this particular group.

First - Schools have been closed in many places per the advocacy of the Teacher's Union (a key democrat constituency). The Teacher's Union had 0 influence with Donald Trump. What do you think the past year was like for suburban women with school age children?

Second - The violence & rioting we saw for over a year was accepted and even supported by blue state governors & mayors. Trump was offering the National Guard. How many suburban moms want that going on near their communities?

Third - Biden's plan to change zoning laws:

"If you live in the suburbs or you're a city-dweller eyeing a move to a quiet cul-de-sac where your kids can play, you need to know about Joe Biden's plan for a federal takeover of local zoning laws.

Biden wants to ramp up an Obama-era social engineering scheme called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing , which barely got started before Donald Trump took office and vowed to stop it. 

Biden's plan is to force suburban towns with single-family homes and minimum lot sizes to build high-density affordable housing smack in the middle of their leafy neighborhoods." 




Conclusion:   If suburban women are literate/knowledgeable at all, they wouldn't be voting for Biden because of policy. They in effect voted against their own interests. Therefore, one has to conclude that they actually cast their votes against Donald Trump because they simply didn't like his demeanor. A very silly way to vote. On the other hand, maybe they actually bought the media hype about "Trump failing to handle the pandemic."

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.8    3 years ago

Anyone who voted for #45 was voting against their own interests unless they were filthy rich.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
10.1.10  pat wilson  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.8    3 years ago
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing

The intention is to promote equal housing opportunities and level the playing field so that all neighborhoods provide the quality services and amenities that are important for people to live successful lives.

Gee, nobody wants that, right ? /s

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1.12  author  Vic Eldred  replied to    3 years ago
.so character matters, particularly among those ‘literate suburban women’.

I never described them as literate. If they voted against the interests of their families, they clearly aren't very intelligent despite their earnings or diploma mill certification.

Al the worst to them.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1.13  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  pat wilson @10.1.10    3 years ago
Gee, nobody wants that, right ?

Especially progressives who live behind walls.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
10.1.14  Veronica  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.12    3 years ago

Coming from you that is a laugh - you voted for the LEAST intelligent president we EVER had (and I do not mean GW).  Talk about low intelligence.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Veronica @10.1.14    3 years ago

He is Albert Einstein compared to that brain dead piece of shit you voted for!

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
10.1.16  Veronica  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.15    3 years ago

[DELETED]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
10.1.17  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.15    3 years ago
He is Albert Einstein compared to that brain dead piece of shit you voted for!

Vic, please, get a grip.  If you told Trump you would give him a million dollars if he could talk intelligently about climate change for two minutes he would be frustrated, flummoxed, and a failure. He is easily the most uninformed president we have ever seen. Easily. 

He claims to have a very high IQ but for some reason he chose to keep it hidden for the past 6 years , lol. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.1.18  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @10.1.15    3 years ago

#45 is a braindead piece of shit.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.1.19  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.17    3 years ago

Sorry, John, It's a little to muddy down here for me.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
10.1.20  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.17    3 years ago

Someone with a measurable IQ knows where PR is, ingesting bleach is wrong, and can find their car when it is 5 feet from the steps of their plane.  Guess who could not.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.2  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @10    3 years ago

And hateful. 

"Which brings us to the fickle swine who voted for Biden because they didn't like the way Trump talked. You are all responsible for this. You were made fools of by the vermin who christened themselves "progressives", (not to be confused with the original Progressives of American history). So you never cared about deeds (policy), it was only about Trump's hurtful words? This is what you voted for instead: inflation, joblessness, a bear market, crime & violence and another middle east crisis."

And residing in an alternate reality.  

You didn't nail anything Vic.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @10.2    3 years ago

jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
10.2.2  pat wilson  replied to  Tessylo @10.2    3 years ago
"Which brings us to the fickle swine who voted for Biden because they didn't like the way Trump talked. You are all responsible for this. You were made fools of by the vermin who christened themselves "progressives",

Somebody's Maypo was cold this morning.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10.2.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  pat wilson @10.2.2    3 years ago

Don't forget to check out.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11  Kavika     3 years ago

The shortage of gas is much the result of panic buying. Florida gas stations have run out of gas yet 90% of our fuel comes in via ship. There has been no disruption in the delivery of fuel to the various ports in FL. 

Here are the stats on ransomware attacks they have been growing at an alarming rate for 5 years and Biden putting money and time into stopping the attacks is needed.

.

The worker shortage is due to a number of reasons, there are a number of articles on it. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Kavika @11    3 years ago
The shortage of gas is much the result of panic buying.

Keep googling.


Here are the stats on ransomware attacks they have been growing at an alarming rate for 5 years and Biden putting money and time into stopping the attacks is needed.

Why not punish the perpetrators?


The worker shortage is due to a number of reasons

In addition to the obvious one?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.1.1  Kavika   replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1    3 years ago

The links are from Florida ports and newspapers. Oh and since I live here I'm a hell of a lot more familiar with the dynamics of Florida than you seem to be.

Here is another link for you.

Why not punish the perpetrators?

Who said anything about not punishing the preps, not I.

In addition to the obvious one?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.2  Tessylo  replied to  Kavika @11    3 years ago

Thanks for confirming what I said and further clarifying Kavika! And for providing the truth as always!

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.3  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Kavika @11    3 years ago

Source:

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer suspended the work search requirement in March of 2020 as the state’s unemployment rate soared above 22 percent amid forced business closures that aimed to control the spread of COVID-19. 

But with the state unemployment rate now back near five percent, the Whitmer administration is planning to restore the requirement. The Unemployment Insurance Agency has not specified an exact date, but the state has begun telling claimants it will happen “ soon .”

“Plans are to reinstate the work search requirement at the end of this month,” UIA spokesperson Lynda Robinson said Tuesday. “Claimants will need to actively search for work and report at least one work search activity per week for each week they claim benefits.”

Restoring the job search criteria is among a series of changes business groups are advocating for in Lansing amid a widespread worker shortage. It comes as the state prepares to allow office spaces to reopen later this month because at least 55 percent of eligible adults have received a COVID vaccine shot.

House Republicans last month proposed a $400 million “return to work” program that would provide $1,000 grants to individuals who leave the unemployment system for a new job, an attempt to help employers compete with enhanced federal benefits.

The Detroit Regional Chamber on Monday proposed its own plan aiming to get 100,000 jobless residents back in the workforce by Labor Day and encouraged lawmakers to fund it with federal stimulus dollars.

Nothing says, "We'll continue to take the money if you're still willing to give it," like actually proving it.

Source:

And yet, there's no shortage of businesses struggling to find employees to fill available positions. Almost 45% of all small businesses had an unfilled job opening by March 21, according to the National Federation of Independent Business. 

Darren Lee, the owner of   Hopscotch and Bourbon   in   Roseville , says he has searched two months for available workers, but with no luck. "...they're content with their unemployment they're content with the money they're being paid to stay home and not work."

Bolstered unemployment insurance might be one of the reasons why hiring has been difficult. But there are other reasons that could be causing the divergence in the local labor market.

Generous unemployment benefits

Jobless benefits from the state along with a   $300 weekly supplement   from the new federal aid package approved earlier this year means that many people are making more money as an unemployed citizen than a working employee.

That might be nice for residents but it can be a tough sell for   small businesses   that can't offer a competitive wage. Even Lee, who offered a $400 bonus to new hires can't fault people for staying home.

"...they're content with an easier life and I can't say I blame them, but I'm not built that way," he said.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.3.1  Tessylo  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3    3 years ago

So what's happening in Michigan represents what's happening everywhere else?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.3.2  Kavika   replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3    3 years ago
Bolstered unemployment insurance might be one of the reasons why hiring has been difficult. But there are other reasons that could be causing the divergence in the local labor market.

And those reasons are in the link that I posted.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.3.3  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Kavika @11.3.2    3 years ago

And are also in the link I provided too.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.3.4  Kavika   replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3.3    3 years ago

Since it seems that the service industry (bars, restaurants) are the ones that are experiencing the largest shortage. Those establishments have minimum wage standards that are much different. 

Minimum Wages for Tipped Employees
Jurisdiction Basic Combined Cash & Tip Minimum Wage Rate Minimum Cash Wage 1
Maine $12.15 $6.08
Maryland $11.00 $3.63
Massachusetts $13.50 $5.55
Michigan $9.65 $3.67

Working in the service industry requires face-to-face contact with a large number of people which increases one's exposer to COVID. Do the bars and restaurants require masks and social distancing? if not the worker is taking an unnecessary chance for a combined $9.65 an hour. Would you do it? I sure as hell wouldn't.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.3.5  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Kavika @11.3.4    3 years ago
Do the bars and restaurants require masks and social distancing?

Um... Governor Whitmer, need I say more?

And if I had no job at all? Yeah, I would do whatever I could to make ends meet. The construction / concrete business is hurting a great deal too... they usually start out at $15 / hour to stand there all day with a sign that says "Slow" on one side and "Stop" on the other. Oh... and lawn companies... $10 / hour to start. General labor $18-$20 to start... Contractors in general are struggling to find people.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.3.6  Tessylo  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3.5    3 years ago
"Um... Governor Whitmer, need I say more?"

Yes?

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.3.7  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Tessylo @11.3.6    3 years ago

You can start at page 3.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.3.8  Tessylo  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3.7    3 years ago

No need.

I'll focus on Maryland.  

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.3.9  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Tessylo @11.3.8    3 years ago

So... why did you say yes to my question regarding Gov. Whitmer? If you didn't want to really know, then why bother asking?

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.3.10  Kavika   replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3.5    3 years ago

Since you brought up construction here is a link about your home state and construction. 

Good read.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.3.11  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Kavika @11.3.10    3 years ago

I read it already.

And two of the teenagers in my house were offered jobs as soon as they have licenses and transportation.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.3.12  Kavika   replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3.11    3 years ago

So it seems that innovative thinking is the answer to the problem and that a labor shortage has been building for quite some time.

In my old industry, there is a waiting line of people wanting to be employed, if the wages are right and management uses creative thinking it seems to alleviate some of the problems.

Here is the latest on McDonald's and wages. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11.3.13  Tessylo  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3.9    3 years ago

Well when all you said was "Um . . .Governor Whitmer, need I say more?" it would help to expound rather than throw up an article at me which may not say what you think.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
11.3.14  Dulay  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @11.3    3 years ago
Darren Lee, the owner of   Hopscotch and Bourbon   in   Roseville , says he has searched two months for available workers, but with no luck. "...they're content with their unemployment they're content with the money they're being paid to stay home and not work."

Except if you are offered a suitable job and refuse it, you loose unemployment. So I guess Darren Lee isn't offering 'suitable jobs'. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.3.15  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @11.3.14    3 years ago

And who do you suppose checks to see if someone has been offered a job?

People have figured out that it is easy to apply and then meet the requirement of "looking for work". Doesn't mean they bother to show up for interviews or that they act appropriately if they do show.

People shouldn't get more for not working than they could working.

That is just laziness and part of the Obama-era-cradle-to-grave governmental "help".

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
11.3.16  Gazoo  replied to  Dulay @11.3.14    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
11.3.17  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @11.3.15    3 years ago
And who do you suppose checks to see if someone has been offered a job?

Well gee Tex. based on the block quote, Darren Lee knows exactly why he can't find workers.

Like other employers, Darren Lee pays unemployment insurance and doesn't want his rate to go up so if one of his laid off employees refused to return, it would behoove him to report them. Those of us who have been employers know these things Tex. 

People have figured out that it is easy to apply and then meet the requirement of "looking for work". Doesn't mean they bother to show up for interviews or that they act appropriately if they do show.

Is it your posit that this is an epiphany that the unemployed JUST figured out Tex? jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

People shouldn't get more for not working than they could working.

Unemployment is EARNED via prior work Tex. Even YOU know that right? 

That is just laziness and part of the Obama-era-cradle-to-grave governmental "help".

Unemployment started in 1935 Tex. Your comment is ridiculous. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
11.3.18  Dulay  replied to  Gazoo @11.3.16    3 years ago

Thanks for highlighting the typo. GREAT job...

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
11.3.19  Gazoo  replied to  Dulay @11.3.18    3 years ago

Typo eh? You make that “typo” quite often.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
11.3.20  Dulay  replied to  Gazoo @11.3.19    3 years ago

Then you have an obligation to point it out every time. 

I always want to spell 'sure' with an 'h'. 

Carry on. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.3.21  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @11.3.17    3 years ago
Well gee Tex. based on the block quote, Darren Lee knows exactly why he can't find workers.

Deflection, and a complete and utter failure to answer what was asked.

Like other employers, Darren Lee pays unemployment insurance and doesn't want his rate to go up so if one of his laid off employees refused to return, it would behoove him to report them.

Which has fuck-all to do with hiring NEW employees. People who hire know these things.

Is it your posit that this is an epiphany that the unemployed JUST figured out Tex?

Have the unemployed ever before made more by not working compared to working? I didn't posit anything, that's just you asking asinine questions again.

Unemployment is EARNED via prior work Tex. Even YOU know that right?

I am well aware of how unemployment works. Making more to not work is stupid. Is that why you seem to be in favor of it?

Unemployment started in 1935 Tex. Your comment is ridiculous. 

I am not inclined to connect all the dots for you any longer.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
11.3.22  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @11.3.21    3 years ago
Which has fuck-all to do with hiring NEW employees. People who hire know these things.

Well then HOW did Darren Lee know why he can't get workers Tex? Unless they were prior employees, they sure as fuck aren't going to tell Darrell why they'd rather collect unemployment. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.3.23  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @11.3.22    3 years ago

I am finished trying to explain mundane things to you.

It is beyond boring.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
11.3.24  arkpdx  replied to  Dulay @11.3.17    3 years ago
Unemployment is EARNED via prior work

Except the extra $300 that was given was not earned anywhere. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11.3.25  Texan1211  replied to  arkpdx @11.3.24    3 years ago
Except the extra $300 that was given was not earned anywhere. 

A little fact that was missed entirely.

I just don't get what is hard to understand---if you pay people more to stay home than they can make working, why would they work?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
11.3.26  Dulay  replied to  arkpdx @11.3.24    3 years ago
Except the extra $300 that was given was not earned anywhere. 

Actually, that is only minimally true. MANY people are STILL making less on unemployment than they made working full time. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.3.27  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dulay @11.3.17    3 years ago

It used to be you were found a job by employment agencies and if you turned a job down, you did not receive benefits.

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
11.4  shona1  replied to  Kavika @11    3 years ago

Evening Kavika...Stuff the petrol...start up a rumour there is going to be a dunny roll shortage again due to drop kicks panic buying... Geez people just never learn...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.4.1  Kavika   replied to  shona1 @11.4    3 years ago
dunny roll shortage again

LOL, the lines would be Kilometers long.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
11.4.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Kavika @11.4.1    3 years ago

In about 20 years or so , when the great grandkids ask about the great 2020 TP shortage and what we did , i will be telling them we dragged out butts across the yard ......in the snow , both ways ......while dodging "murder hornets ".

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
11.4.3  Kavika   replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.4.2    3 years ago

and it was uphill in both directions.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
11.4.4  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Kavika @11.4.3    3 years ago

Right , i forgot that part , but in 20 yrs ill be almost 80 so i can be forgiven for forgetting some details .

 Im finding it hard to believe in 9 days ill be 59 ......

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
11.4.5  shona1  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.4.4    3 years ago

Evening Mark...59...you are just a Spring chook...it is only a number and I guarantee you will not feel any different the following day..😀😀

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.4.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.4.4    3 years ago

I would kill to be 59 again.  I turn 69 in July.jrSmiley_5_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.4.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  shona1 @11.4    3 years ago

What is a dunny roll?  I am guessing that it some kind bread.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Guide
11.4.8  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.4.2    3 years ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

I HAVE to remember that one!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
11.4.9  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  shona1 @11.4.5    3 years ago

Oh my mind says im still not old , but the last week of turning garden plots and doing some yard work for those that cant do it themselves have definitely made my muscles and joints remind me i am not as flexable as i once was ( results of a youth spent not caring of consequences or potential injuries that come back to haunt one later in life , im a better weather predictor than a trained weather person now ) next year at this time i will be considering whether to do the full retirement or not , been semi retired for the last 10 years or so , but keep finding "Busy work " to keep myself somewhat out of trouble  and keep things in perspective .

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
11.4.10  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @11.4.7    3 years ago

(chuckles) , served dry and depending on make can be kind of rough , when wet , hard to chew in bulk......

 In 10 years i will be saying the same thing , no doubt about it as to wishing i was this age again.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
11.4.11  Raven Wing  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @11.4.7    3 years ago
What is a dunny roll?  I am guessing that it some kind bread

I believe that is an Aussie term for a roll of toilet paper.

I worked with an Microsoft Access pro who lived in Australia during an Access Technical Beta Test project a few years back, and I learned some of the Aussie lingo. And she learned some of the American lingo from me. I was a very interesting exchange.

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
11.4.12  shona1  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @11.4.7    3 years ago

Morning Paula..toilet paper..we often refer to the toilet as a dunny or loo...so if someone says they are going to the dunny..they are going to the bathroom/toilet...Sorry I forget sometimes when posting on here and use everyday language you might not know what I am talking about..😀😀 

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
11.4.13  shona1  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @11.4.9    3 years ago

Morning Mark...that is so good of you to help people out that can no longer manage. I am in that category myself now, never thought I would be in that boat but the myeloma has done that.

I am sure people really appreciate your help and efforts. Good on you. Yes we all get older and have to gracefully accept the loss of youth...but at the end of the day...it is what you make of it.

Can highly recommend full retirement glad I did 4 years ago when I was 57....as you never know what is around the corner..so go for it....😀😀

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
12  Greg Jones    3 years ago

The Dems keep trying to wash the mud off of, and apply lipstick to...their pig of a president.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @12    3 years ago

The only pig of a 'president' was #45.  #45 isn't covered in mud, it's shit.  

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
12.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Greg Jones @12    3 years ago

Meh, so long as it isn’t Trump I’m good. Frankly I’d rather the office be vacant than for that piece of shit to spend another day in the Oval Office.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
12.2.1  arkpdx  replied to  Thrawn 31 @12.2    3 years ago
Frankly I’d rather the office be vacant 

You got your wish. 

 
 
 
FortunateSon
Freshman Silent
12.2.2  FortunateSon  replied to  arkpdx @12.2.1    3 years ago

Yepp.. LOL 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
12.2.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thrawn 31 @12.2    3 years ago

It was largely vacant when he held the office as a lot of his time was spent on golfing.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.3  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @12    3 years ago

c10b42d7e75ccf5689ccf6b80887d580.jpg

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
13  Thrawn 31    3 years ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
14  Buzz of the Orient    3 years ago

A number of years ago the South Park Kids had the answer to all of this...

blame-canada.jpg

And now, as promoted by Trump and Pompeo, the answer is to....

800

But what MUST be ignored is the REAL reason...

OIP.CIockxUbW9HFdqwTkEIJYgAAAA?w=169&h=178&c=7&o=5&pid=1.7

 
 

Who is online

Igknorantzruls
zuksam
Kavika


78 visitors