╌>

Liberals Target Trump Supporters Businesses in Midwestern City to Get Them Shut Down

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  7 years ago  •  138 comments


Liberals Target Trump Supporters Businesses in Midwestern City to Get Them Shut Down
This year, the left has accused innocent kids of being evil racists, fabricated countless hate crimes to push a false narrative, and pushed the entire Democratic platform off the edge of insane leftist policy. If you don’t support extreme gun control, you’re evil. If you don’t hate President Trump, you’re evil. If you think that terrorists shouldn’t be running Middle Eastern countries, you’re evil. If you dare to have white skin or be a gender-binary male, you’re extra evil.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



It’s getting crazy. We’ve seen the cycle of rhetorical escalation for years. It felt like it was coming to a head in 2016. Now, we know that we were only seeing the beginning. This year, the left has accused innocent kids of being evil racists, fabricated countless hate crimes to push a false narrative, and pushed the entire Democratic platform off the edge of insane leftist policy.

If you don’t support extreme gun control, you’re evil. If you don’t hate President Trump, you’re evil. If you think that terrorists shouldn’t be running Middle Eastern countries, you’re evil. If you dare to have white skin or be a gender-binary male, you’re extra evil.

History tells us that when a group of fundamentalists gets riled up enough and starts to believe demonizing propaganda, they do truly horrific things. Anyone who thinks this can’t happen in America is sorely mistaken. Liberals in the Midwest just crossed a line that shows exactly how ready they are to tear this country apart.

Boycotts have been used by a lot of people for a lot of reasons throughout history. People who dislike Hobby Lobby’s health insurance policies choose to do business elsewhere. Likewise, many conservatives stopped purchasing Gillette in response to their recent ‘woke’ ad campaign.

We’ll skip the nuance in these two boycotts (there are big differences between them) and simply say that it’s fairly reasonable to try to shop with companies with which you philosophically agree. That’s all fine.

Boycotts have a darker side to them. A few classic examples of malicious boycotts can be found in the U.S. during the peak of McCarthyism or Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

The fundamental difference between these kinds of boycotts is the goal. If you boycotted Gillette, it’s probably because you don’t want to give money to a company that vilifies masculinity as evil. When the Germans boycotted Jewish businesses, it was to drive them to poverty. It wasn’t about principle. The goal was for the Jews, packed into ghettos, to starve to death. Keep that distinction in mind. 

Meanwhile in Pittsburgh

You probably already heard about actors Debra Messing and Eric McCormack asking for a blacklist for Hollywood Trump supporters. That’s already pretty bad, but what’s happening in Pittsburgh right now takes that extra step.

Left-wing activists have taken to social media to publish lists of every local business that has any association or tie with President Trump. The association could be in the form of a campaign donation, vocalizing their support for the President, or just being baselessly accused of sympathizing with Trump supporters. If someone in a shop wears a red hat, that’s enough to go on these black lists.

You can see how that’s flirting with the darker form of boycotts. The malice doesn’t wait for confirmation, and it’s aimed at someone for simply having a different politician opinion.

The problem is that it doesn’t stop here. The left-wing nut jobs in Pittsburgh aren’t satisfied with simply spending their money elsewhere. They have vandalized these shops and protested in front of storefronts. These boycotts are designed to intimidate customers into joining the boycott. They aren’t expressing an ideological difference with their wallets. They’re trying to destroy every local business that they affiliate with President Trump.

You understand the historical connection. You see why this is dangerous, wrong and illegal. Unfortunately, the rabid left can’t make those connections.

If you explain to them the history of Jewish boycotts, they’ll argue that it’s why they’re doing these boycotts. If only people had been as aggressive with Nazi businesses as Antifa, there wouldn’t have been a Holocaust. They’re actually that delusional, and that’s what you really need to take away from all of this.

Not a single member of the SS believed that they were the bad guys. You can see historical pictures. They smiled at Auschwitz because they believed they were ridding the world of evil. That’s how extremism works, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing today.

The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form. They’ve spent years building this narrative, and it’s all so they can justify whatever means they decide are necessary to get rid of you.

They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up. This is the unifying theme in all of their policy proposals, and it’s plainly evident in the actions of every leftist “protester.”

They’re trying to silence and divide you. Don’t let them. They are trying to bully and intimidate you. Stand strong. History is full of extremists vying for power. The difference between their success or failure in that endeavor is you.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    7 years ago

Next comes the organized  breaking of  the windows of businesses that can be tied to Trump supporters. Probably a coordinated, overnight assault.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    7 years ago

The usual suspects are planning another fascist Antifa/illegal immigrant rally at the ICE facility in Aurora, Colorado on the 21st of this month.

There are efforts being planned to meet them by anti-protestors. These violent left wing radicals are turning out to be worse than Hitler's

Brown Shirts and their tactics are pretty much the same

th?id=OIP.RmysiJT_jXUNpG8dDq8n5QHaGd&w=2

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    7 years ago

Fascism ( / ˈ f æ ʃ ɪ z əm / ) is a form of  far right-wing ,  authoritarian   ultranationalism [1] [2]  characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy [3]  which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. [4]  The first fascist movements  emerged in Italy  during  World War I , before  spreading to other European countries . [4]   Opposed to  liberalism ,  Marxism , and  anarchism , fascism is placed on the  far-right  within the traditional  left–right spectrum . [4] [5] [6]

Fascists saw  World War I  as a  revolution  that brought massive changes to the nature of war, society, the state, and technology. The advent of  total war  and the total mass mobilization of society had broken down the distinction between civilians and combatants. A "military citizenship" arose in which all citizens were involved with the military in some manner during the war. [7] [8]  The war had resulted in the rise of a powerful state capable of mobilizing millions of people to serve on the front lines and providing economic production and logistics to support them, as well as having unprecedented authority to intervene in the lives of citizens. [7] [8]

Fascists believe that  liberal democracy  is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a  totalitarian   one-party state  as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties. [9]  Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a  dictator  and a  martial  government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society. [9]  Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature and views political violence, war and  imperialism  as means that can achieve national rejuvenation. [10] [11]  Fascists advocate a  mixed economy , with the principal goal of achieving  autarky  (national economic self-sufficiency) through  protectionist  and  interventionist  economic policies. [12]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
2.1.3  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    7 years ago

I find that comment deeply disturbing. How can you speak for the Jewish Community? You probably don't even know one. Stop with the fear mongering. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    7 years ago
The usual suspects are planning another fascist Antifa/illegal immigrant rally at the ICE facility in Aurora, Colorado on the 21st of this month.

I'll be there to watch and film tea party fascists that attempt to hinder the 1st amendment rights of a legal protest get their over ripened melons thumped. let them tempt some 1960's karma. that ICE facility is surrounded by immigrant neighborhoods. it won't bother me a bit to watch Michelle Malkin and the xenophobic cult scum get their unamerican and unconstitutional asses kicked.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.3    7 years ago
Stop with the fear mongering.

The seeded article doesnt even have a name attached to it at the source.  And the article linked to in the first comment is by Todd Starnes, a known far right nut case from Fox News Radio. 

This is what happens to the seeds when such trash is allowed to roam free on your site. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
2.1.6  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    7 years ago
This is what happens to the seeds when such trash is allowed to roam free on your site. 

It's called freedom of speech, John. See what I did. I countered his position. That is what you are supposed to do.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.7  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.6    7 years ago

They are posting nutjob articles and links. Then we cant say anything to them without having it censored. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
2.1.9  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.2    7 years ago
 characterized by dictatorial power

"I have a pen and a phone."

forcible suppression of opposition

Antifa.

and strong regimentation of society and of the economy

P.C. policeand Business killing taxes.

That doesn't sound like the right in the U.S., I don't have to say what that sounds like do I?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.15  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.9    7 years ago
"I have a pen and a phone."

And trump has a sharpie... Maybe he can upgrade to a pen and a phone when he gets past 5th grade. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
2.1.16  Raven Wing   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    7 years ago
They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up. This is the unifying theme in all of their policy proposals, and it’s plainly evident in the actions of every leftist “protester.”

Wow! Talk about fear mongering. You are doing a really good job of that yourself to be pointing the finger at anyone else.

Your own hatred is truly palpable, and you have the gall to talk about others being hate mongers. Such hypocrisy is out in far right field.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
2.1.17  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    7 years ago
The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form. They’ve spent years building this narrative, and it’s all so they can justify whatever means they decide are necessary to get rid of you.

Hey XX, since when do you speak for anyone but yourself. I would imagine that most Jews on NT and in the US would think that your comment, at best, is complete BS. BTW the majority of Jews are democratic, not republican. Which can be said of most all minorities. 

You'd better concentrate on keeping the few minorities in the Republican party happy before running your mouth about something you have little or no knowledge of. 

You could start with Trump's African American that just quit the republican party. And he lives in Redding the mythical capital of Jeffersonia. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
2.1.18  Raven Wing   replied to  Kavika @2.1.17    7 years ago

You could start with Trump's African American that just quit the republican party. And he lives in Redding the mythical capital of Jeffersonia. 

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
2.1.20  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.19    7 years ago
Perhaps you could use the benefit of context by reading the whole article.  

My comment was directed and in response to your ignorant comment.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.22  JohnRussell  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.1.21    7 years ago

No one in the history of this forum has posted as much fake news as you have.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.23  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @2.1.4    7 years ago

You know as well as all the rest of us that Antifa wants nothing better than another Charlottesville. Why would you support such violent actions by people who should be in the US in the first place and forcibly raise a Mexican flag over a facility that is currently housing mostly illegals who were already criminals? Whose side are you on anyway?

Hopefully the Aurora police will do their jobs this time and restrain the protestors for assaulting peaceful anti-protestors. The last time they were ordered to stand down by Aurora authorities who ordered the police chief to make the call ignore the trouble makers and made no attempt to keep them apart. Denver is just as bad, letting the same type of scum desicrate the memorial to fallen police officers which is right outside the main police station while the rank and file were told to stay in inside and chain the door shut.

Hope you film your leftist buddies hiding behind their black masks when they start the trouble. 

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
2.1.25  sixpick  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    7 years ago

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
2.1.27  Raven Wing   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.24    7 years ago

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_24_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.28  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.8    7 years ago
I agree with and stand by the author and the overall content of the whole article. 

That's unfortunate because the author is a clueless hack. 

First of all, the Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses was an action by the GOVERNMENT. Both you and the author should open a fucking history book. 

Secondly, your author doesn't support one word of his accusations about the boycotts in Pittsburgh. Since you claim to stand by the overall content of the whole article, how about you prove that businesses have been vandalized and protests have occurred outside of those businesses since this alleged list came out. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.29  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.23    7 years ago
Antifa wants nothing better than another Charlottesville

it was a trumpster idiot that drove a car into that protest and killed a woman, not antifa.

I listen to the same ADF ass licking thumper owned AM radio station hosted by tea party advocates you listen to. they've been promoting a violent confrontation at the protest for a month. some of the radio hosts and callers have been threatening a violent response to anyone that does anything they define as desecrating the american flag, which is a protected 1st amendment right. they have even threatened protesters by claiming they will be carrying firearms on air. let the tea party morons try and we'll see what happens next.

describing those exercising that right as antifa is a sweeping generalization. antifa isn't a tool of the democrats, they're an international group started after WWII, but the proud boys, kkk, neo-nazis, white supremacists, and tea party are definitely associated with trump and the right. I think it's hilarious that a puny 5K watt directional AM radio station ginning up a bunch of old mental defectives to put themselves in harms way for ratings and to promote book sales for a dumbass tea party skank. any tea party dipshit blood that flows from that protest will be on their hands.

I won't be wearing a black mask. I'll be in the anti-protest group waiting for someone to set off a string of firecrackers so I can watch the tea party faithful drop and kiss the pavement in fear. although I doubt there's any real antifa members in denver, I cordially invite them to do a buck and wing on anyone with a selective definition of the 1st amendment. I plan on defending the whole thing.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.30  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.11    7 years ago
my aunt being married to a Jew and my cousins being his and her offspring

not according to buzz, better check with him on blood purity.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
2.1.31  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.8    7 years ago

Well, if you agree with him, you have to have some basis for that and I doubt that you do. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.1.34  Cerenkov  replied to  devangelical @2.1.4    7 years ago

I see the left continues to embrace violence and intolerance. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.35  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.33    7 years ago
I notice that none on the center left to far left deny that conservative businesses and customers are being targeted by the left or condemn the practice.

I notice that you can't prove that any such thing is actually happening. 

Isn’t being opposed to what is happening as described by the article enough reason to support the article author?  

Since the author failed to support his claims with any evidence, NO. 

I did a search for news stories about protests and vandalism by 'liberals' @ businesses in Pittsburgh. There isn't one news article about your author's claim. It looks like this article is just another example of conservative fever dream. 

You and the conservatives here jump to condemn actions that you have no proof ever happened. Now you insist that you don't have to defend your agreement with  FABRICATED allegations. It looks like you and others here are just fine making shit up so you can spew bullshit about liberals.

Spreading lies is the opposite of 'Christian' Xx. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.36  devangelical  replied to  Cerenkov @2.1.34    7 years ago

unamerican filth with no respect for the US Constitution or those that died defending it deserve public beat downs

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1.39  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.38    7 years ago

You don't seem to understand free speech goes both ways. We do not imprison people merely for expressing themselves in the USA...

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Participates
2.1.40  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.38    7 years ago
And those who engage in public beat downs deserve to be arrested and put in prison for their crimes

Then based on that premise, I trust you'll be turning yourself in to your local constabulary...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.46  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.38    7 years ago

[delete] 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.47  devangelical  replied to    7 years ago

see what happens when commas aren't used?

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
2.1.48  Raven Wing   replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.1.40    7 years ago

I trust you'll be turning yourself in to your local constabulary...

jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.49  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.42    7 years ago

Where is your proof of vandalism and protests Xx? 

STOP deflecting. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.50  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.43    7 years ago

Neither you nor the author provided any evidence that there has been any physical violence Xx. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.51  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.45    7 years ago
I await but not with held breath your apology for falsely accusing me regarding the truth of the seed.  

Since those links are all you've got to support the bullshit in your seed, you have no right to expect an apology. 

From your TH link:

"The data that we plan to publish is publicly available from state governments and the Federal Election Commission. We're simply indexing that data in a more searchable way, the administrators of "Boycott MAGA" wrote on their Facebook page. "We do not encourage violence against Trump supporters. We simply support ridiculing them, alienating them, and refusing to patronize businesses run by them."

There has been NO vandalism or protests Xx. So you're slurping up the pablum and encourage your fellow travelers to swill it along with you.

Don't get pissed off when those of us who prefer facts don't imbibe. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.53  MrFrost  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.1.21    7 years ago
Yet the site allowed your parade of unsourced Russian hoax propaganda. Amazing!

Hey if it will allow you to post your vibrator/gif on a daily basis, you'll have a hard time complaining about others... yea? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.58  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.55    7 years ago
How did the anti ice riot go today?

Another fever dream Xx. No riot occurred. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.59  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.56    7 years ago
Did we get beat down in Aurora, Co. in front of the ICE facility today

You were in Aurora, Co today? Tell me all about it...

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.62  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.60    7 years ago
I wasn’t but the one I was addressing lives in the area and made claims as to what he just might do. 

That doesn't give a reason why you would say 'we' when you weren't there. 

BTW, the one you were addressing said that he would video and watch the confrontation [which never happened]. What is your issue with him doing so? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.63  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.61    7 years ago
Of course not.  The pro ICE group was much larger than the enemy group and Antifa doesn’t usually act out unless they are the ones with the large numerical advantage.

That is FALSE Xx. Do you never tire of posting bullshit? 

There were more Anti-ICE protestors at the event at the commander's home than there were Pro-ICE counter protestors at the detention center. The Pro-ICE counter protestors were the ones that were outnumbered. The Anti-ICE protestors CHOSE to remain non-violent. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.66  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.65    7 years ago
And three thugs were arrested by the police at the home.

Just as many of y'all [I use that to indicate those that you identify with and support] claim that 'bigot' has lost it's meaning from being overused, many of us [I use that to indicate those that I identify with and support] thin the term 'thugs' has also lost it's meaning and for exactly the same reason. 

Not to mention some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors and its possible that some of them may well have made it obvious that they were packing heat.

You know this how? Link? Or is that just more BS that you pulled from your nether regions? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.68  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.67    7 years ago
Read what I wrote and figure it out yourself if you can.  

I did read what you wrote, you aren't hard to figure out at all Xx. 

Then see if you notice the words “possibly” and “may well” and then try to figure out if I was stating a fact or expressing an opinion. 

Not in these comments you didn't. 

And three thugs were arrested by the police at the home. Not to mention some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors

No 'possibly' or may well' in either of those statements. 

So where's your link stating that ANY of his neighbors are 'pro-ICE'? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.70  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.69    7 years ago
 Here it is:     “some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors and its possible that some of them may well have made it obvious that they were packing heat.”

This will be the second time that I have asked you to PROVE that "some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors". 

Tic Toc. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.72  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.71    7 years ago
David Booth, who lives in Choate's neighborhood, refuses to sit by while these bullies invade his community.

Yet he doesn't say anything about being out on the street during the protest in 'his neighborhood'. 

"I would like to see the neighborhood rise up and support this man and his family."

Nothing about supporting ICE. 

For Coloradans, violent threats to law enforcement officials' neighborhoods are especially disturbing given the chilling 2013 assassination of the head of the Colorado Department of Corrections outside his home in Monument.

Yet though Fox tried to infer at the time that it was a Muslim, Tom Clements was assinated by a white supremist. 

Oh, BTFW, I note that Malkin decries images of  Choate's face surrounded by flames, claiming that it suggests arson. After the AOC ad, I thought y'all were all about that kind of imagery. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.74  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.73    7 years ago

Still not a 'pro-ICE' statement. He is supporting his NEIGHBOR, not ICE. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.78  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.75    7 years ago

Seriously, WHY do you think that repeating the same non responsive bullshit contributes to the discussion Xx?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.79  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.77    7 years ago

Nope, not going to believe a fucking word out to Malkin's mouth. She's been caught in more false comments than you...

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.81  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.80    7 years ago

All it proves is that Malkin claims that. As I said, Malkin isn't credible. 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
2.1.86  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.85    7 years ago

What ? Who petitions whom ?

To move the arrow thingy in the graphics ?  

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.88  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.87    7 years ago
People petition the other site to re review sites that  have have already been reviewed and listed as right bias by them in order to get them moved into questionable by them.  It has happened this year to a large number of sites. 

Gee Xx. Based on your prior comments, you are one of those people.

As their methodology states, review is a normal practice. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2.1.89  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.22    7 years ago
No one in the history of this forum has posted as much fake news as you have.

No way! That's totally false. I personally have posted more fake news that anyone...and am proud of it!

(While this may seem like a stupid comment, please be aware that I am merely trying to fit in...to the general tone and mental level of most of the participants in these discussions).

Are you people really this stupid-- or are you just pretending?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2.1.90  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @2.1.89    7 years ago

Are you people really this stupid-- or are you just pretending?

(And if so...why? 'Tis a mystery . . . jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif )

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.93  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.91    7 years ago
I have never asked that site to re review a left bias site to make it questionable instead.

You know that others have how? 

I'm sure that your requests were on behalf of getting questionable sites to be rated as acceptable. What you should be doing is petitioning the sites to get them to stop posting BS. 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
2.1.95  pat wilson  replied to  Krishna @2.1.90    7 years ago

Sometimes I think we're being pranked.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2.1.96  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.94    7 years ago
I’d never stoop to that.  They are human debris scum of the earth and there is no way I’d beg anything from them.  

Yet you stoop to calling people you don't even know 'human debris scum. 

I’m more interested in getting them included in a lawsuit by certain groups listed as hate against those who use the SPLC labeling in the pursuit of their business practices.  I’m hoping ADF or FAIR or AFA or FRC or all of them include MBFC in such a lawsuit. 

MBFC's methodology doesn't take into consideration whether a site is run by a hate group or not. They base their ratings on CONTENT. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3  MrFrost    7 years ago
If you don’t support extreme gun control, you’re evil. If you don’t hate President Trump, you’re evil. If you think that terrorists shouldn’t be running Middle Eastern countries, you’re evil. If you dare to have white skin or be a gender-binary male, you’re extra evil.

Any article that supports that level of hyperbole cannot be taken seriously. 

NEXT!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @3    7 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    7 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    7 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    7 years ago

removed for context

You don't even know what fascism is, we should take you seriously because.......?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.3    7 years ago

Quit going anal on terminology.

How does the term Left Wing Brown Shirts fit? How about socialist left wing scum agitators?

Putin's police do the same things in the same way.

Both of them would be proud that some so called Americans are emulating them and their methods.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4  Dismayed Patriot    7 years ago
"The fundamental difference between these kinds of boycotts is the goal. If you boycotted Gillette, it’s probably because you don’t want to give money to a company that vilifies masculinity as evil. When the Germans boycotted Jewish businesses, it was to drive them to poverty. It wasn’t about principle. The goal was for the Jews, packed into ghettos, to starve to death. Keep that distinction in mind."

Hilarious. So according to the "American Liberty Report's" anonymous opinion author, conservative boycotts equal the righteous allies, while the progressive boycotts equate to Nazi Germany starving Jews.

 "left-wing nut jobs in Pittsburgh", "the rabid left" , "The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form"

Just more expected despicable hate and bullshit rhetoric trying to put words in their opponents mouths. 79% of Jewish Americans vote Democrat, and from this conservatives statement it's very clear why. This dumb shit is the only one saying "dirty Jew", not those on the left. His/Her (who knows because the opinion piece doesn't list an author) comparison is just gross and completely uncalled for. 

"They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up"

What vile hateful lies some on the right spout. Many claimed Obama was going to "round them up" too and even though after 8 years that never happened, they're still pissed off at Obama for their tiny weak minds ever having to imagine it.

"They’re trying to silence and divide you.", "They are trying to bully and intimidate you."

Talk about ginning up hate with disgusting violent rhetoric and fear. What they're really afraid of are people who can think for themselves and refuse to financially support the anti-immigrant, anti-minority, anti-lgtbq and truly Anti-American right wing extremists and the actual calculable violence they inspire. This anonymous conservative moron that is claiming boycotts from the left are akin to Nazi oppression yet completely ignores the dozens and dozens of innocent Americans gunned down by right wing extremists every year just shows how hypocritical and insincere the right wing forked tongued really is.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Silent
4.1  lady in black  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    7 years ago

69993107_1351832564983368_4798842933497298944_n.png?_nc_cat=101&_nc_oc=AQlW2pmiwY8A0vUVTMkQS2Fx5cZbsw3_tEdkBeC7BmPPyc_4iyDPiY0XMviCn-SNZmc&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=8e040cab6c017152c0212480b55fedfe&oe=5DFFA345

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Raven Wing   replied to  lady in black @4.1    7 years ago

For many it seems the Constitution is not worth the paper it was written on...

.......unless they want to use it for their own agenda.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Participates
4.1.3  Raven Wing   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.2    7 years ago
You describe the secular progressive democrat left faction quite well

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_36_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    7 years ago

You're not thinking for yourself. [delete] It appears you have been brainwashed by an overload of hateful left wing lies and propaganda.

Very sad....

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
4.2.2  Cerenkov  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.1    7 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 

Who is online





230 visitors