Q Anon Loving GOP Freshman Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Nuttier Than You Think

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  john-russell  •  one week ago  •  75 comments

Q Anon Loving GOP Freshman Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Nuttier Than You Think
Marjorie Taylor Greene  @mtgreenee On January 21, 2021, I'll be filing Articles of Impeachment against Joe Biden for abuse of power.

Far right crackpot, Q Anon loving,  US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene told a weirdo far right tv show Wednesday evening that she plans to file impeachment charges against Joe Biden on the first day he is in office. Greene gave her views to Newsmax host Greg Kelly, ( who only the day before had called for Biden's impeachment for an even more idiotic reason. )

Said Greene, a freshman US Rep. from Georgia.

 "I'm a big believer of having people in office that are actually willing to do the job. And I can't imagine people in this country being so fearful of a future of a Biden presidency that they may be willing to commit violence like they did in the Capitol here in Washington, D.C. We cannot have that, I do not condone that violence. The American people need hope, they need to know that there are Republicans in Congress that are willing to stand up and fight for them, regardless of being in a minority, regardless of having all odds against us, against me, or against anyone in Congress. We have to hold people accountable."

Ms. Greene's high school English composition teacher died of embarrassment after reading the incomprehensible paragraph. 

=============================================================

Marjorie Taylor Greene then tweeted out her stupid idea for all to see. 

Marjorie Taylor Greene  @mtgreenee On January 21, 2021, I'll be filing Articles of Impeachment against Joe Biden for abuse of power. At last report Joe Biden was seen not quaking in his boots.  =========================================== 

related https://www.theblaze.com/news/marjorie-greene-impeachment-biden

When The Blaze reached out to Greene's office to clarify her motivation for filing impeachment articles, her spokesperson offered the following response:

-

Rep. Greene simply wants to be a voice for the voiceless. American conservatives have been banned, censored, deplatformed and physically attacked. Unfortunately that removes hope from the people. Congresswoman Greene wants to defend these Americans and represent the Silent Majority.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
1  author  JohnRussell    one week ago

She sounds like she's going to give Louie Gohmert a run for his money for the title of "stupidest person in Congress"

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @1    one week ago

So tired of the BS coming from all sides! Let's just get the inauguration over with so the country can get on with getting back on track and be done with the petty crap that both left and right are pulling right now.

 
 
 
Krishna
1.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    one week ago
Let's just get the inauguration over with so the country can get on with getting back on track and be done with the petty crap that both left and right are pulling right now.

I wonder???

Do you think politicians will be "done with this petty crap" after the Inauguration?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Krishna @1.1.1    one week ago

One can only hope, but I doubt it.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
1.1.3  Raven Wing  replied to  Krishna @1.1.1    one week ago
Do you think politicians will be "done with this petty crap" after the Inauguration?

No way. Those who are tied to Trumps' nads will never let it go. They will keep the idea of the "Stop The Steal," saying that Biden stole the election for likely years to come. They will in turn try every way possible to hog tie Bidens hands to get anything done, and make his time as President as miserable as they did Obama's. That seems to be all the GOP is good at. Being responsible Lawmakers is not their cup of tea. They prefer to drink from the bottom of the cup. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    one week ago

I'm so tired of the BS coming from the 'right'.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.5  Bob Nelson  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    one week ago
the petty crap that both left and right 

Jeez... Do you really think that occupying the Capitol was "petty"?

Do you remember the left occupying the Capitol recently?

C'mon! That's bothsidesism caried to an absurd level.

 
 
 
evilgenius
1.1.6  evilgenius  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.3    one week ago
Those who are tied to Trumps' nads will never let it go.

Matt Gaetz specifically said in his 1 min House speech yesterday that they will never let the Hunter Biden laptop bullshit go and tell any lies he needs to tie it around Joe's neck. As long as they are enabled by their constituents and the rest of the Republican Party we will see 4 (or more) years of opposition like we did during the Obama administration.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    one week ago

Hey, Ed! How about you and me do what we can to stop dragging this out and talk fishing?

Do you fish?

Anytime you want to talk fishing, come find me

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
1.1.8  NV-Robin6  replied to  evilgenius @1.1.6    one week ago

Gaetz, Gym Jordan, and their band of congress traitors are about to find out what being traitors are really all about. 

 
 
 
Kathleen
1.1.9  Kathleen  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1    one week ago

I agree, I would like to move on. It will be best for the country and everyone. Sadly, I don’t see this happening for a long time. 

 
 
 
Ender
1.1.10  Ender  replied to  Kathleen @1.1.9    one week ago

I think the sane can move on but the fringes will still be flailing.

Sadly they seem to have loud voices for some reason.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1.11  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.5    one week ago

I was referring the aftermath, not the actual act itself.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1.12  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.7    one week ago

You got it!

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1.13  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.4    one week ago

Yeah, cause we all know, in your eyes anyway, the liberal left is blameless and pure as the newfallen snow right? Get real!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.1.14  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.4    one week ago

I'm tired of the bs entirely, no matter what side it comes from.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.15  Dulay  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1.11    one week ago

We are nowhere near the 'aftermath' yet. There will be years of investigation and prosecutions. Hopefully, we can cut the head off of all the snakes in the pit. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.1.16  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.1.14    one week ago

That is the point I was trying to get across.

 
 
 
arkpdx
1.1.17  arkpdx  replied to  Bob Nelson @1.1.5    6 days ago
Do you remember the left occupying the Capitol recently 

No but I do remember them rioting and attempting to burn several cities across the country for months on end.  Including on inauguration day in Washington DC in 2017

I remember their leaders stating that if they don't get their way they will destroy the country. (never mind that getting their way would destroy the country)

Of course you won't remember that because liberal are expert at selective memories. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
1.1.18  Bob Nelson  replied to  arkpdx @1.1.17    6 days ago
I remember their leaders stating that if they don't get their way they will destroy the country.

Gosh! 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
1.2  Raven Wing  replied to  JohnRussell @1    one week ago

Unbelievable that she is the best her party could run for the seat, and the people who voted for her are not much better. 

To say she will file to impeach Biden is the height of not only stupidity, but, total ignorance. 

 
 
 
devangelical
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Raven Wing @1.2    one week ago

that poor Q thing is a product of multiple generations of family incest in the deep south. pity.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @1.2.1    one week ago

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.2.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.2    one week ago

Someone should superimpose Ivanka's head onto Vicki.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
1.2.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Raven Wing @1.2    one week ago

One would think that the Republican Party has enough image problem right now without having that idiot Greene shooting her ignorant mouth off. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
1.3  arkpdx  replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 days ago

No one can out stupid AOC and her "squad"

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
2  Bob Nelson    one week ago

She's the imbecile who laughed at the idea of wearing masks is the House safe-room, while the Trumpist mob raged through the Capitol.

 
 
 
Krishna
2.1  Krishna  replied to  Bob Nelson @2    one week ago
the Trumpist mob

That is not the correct term. The correct term when referring to them is "MAGA-terrorists".

(Although Linguistic scholars do disagree whether or not it should be hyphenated).

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
2.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Krishna @2.1    one week ago

Oh!

Please exccuse my French...

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
2.1.2  NV-Robin6  replied to  Krishna @2.1    one week ago

I prefer Magats myself. Bottomfeeder white supremacists for the most part. That's not all Republicans, but it is for most Trumpers who fall for this orange buffoon's con game. Most have been complicit in fomenting the lies of their faux outrages. Enough to radicalize a big group of idiots to become their weapons. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
2.1.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  NV-Robin6 @2.1.2    one week ago

Yeah, Magats is close enought to maggots.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
2.1.4  NV-Robin6  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.1.3    6 days ago

Well yes, they are! LOL

How are you Buzz of the Orient? I know we weren' t the best of friends and had quite a few opposing views and perhaps even some heated chats before if I remember correctly. I hope you have seen how the demonization of anything different than white America is trying a strongarm approach again.  Whether its other nations and it's people on our planet are being so weaponized to the point of this anarchy and chaos. America will pull through, I have zero doubt about that!

Do they criticize America as much as our mental midgets do China and it's beautiful people? I don't hate China, or Chinese people at all. I remember you're there and very happy as an ex-pat, married to a wonderful woman you praise. (I honor that about you more than you can ever know!)  Are there issues I despise about China, damn right, especially their Uighur genocide & Hong Kong and all that jazz we have no control over. The Uigher's though seemingly is not any different than Christians hating on Muslims or Jews here and all this we're dealing with. I always thought the Chinese had at least more propensity to be enlightened. I'd love to hear your perspective about China, it's ruling body, etc. Maybe I should just review your older posts one day so you don't need to be on repeat, rinse, repeat just for me. I know I've missed quite a bit having nearly a year out here. 

I just want to see an end to these ridiculous religious holy wars and threats to end civilization in the name of. The hypocrisy is preposterous & dangerous in our modern world of technology and weaponry. 

I do want you to know I do appreciate you, your history and what you bring here with your perspective experiencing that neck of woods first hand on this small blue dot planet in the middle of the Milky Way Galaxy. Stay safe, be well. jrSmiley_34_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
2.1.5  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  NV-Robin6 @2.1.4    6 days ago

Thank you NV-Robin6 for your kind words.  As for your feelings about controversial issues in China, I learned in the first lecture of the first day of law school, delivered by the dean, that if we refuse or are unable to learn, understand and be capable of arguing the other side of a conflict that we are attempting to win, we might as well quit law school today, because there is ALWAYS another side to a story, and we damn well need to know it..  However, that is not an issue to be discussed here.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
2.1.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Krishna @2.1    6 days ago

Not all were Magats, so I just use...domestic terrorists.

 
 
 
pat wilson
3  pat wilson    one week ago

The struggle is real....jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Gsquared
4  Gsquared    one week ago

The IQ level among the House Republican membership, already at an all time low, just took a nosedive.

 
 
 
Krishna
5  Krishna    one week ago

We have to hold people accountable."

Except, of course, if they are President! jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
6  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    one week ago

I don't think she has any idea how utterly ridiculous she is.

Her campaign took a hit due to her association with the group QAnon, and she went into damage control on...Fox News.  

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia congressional candidate who is a prominent QAnon advocate, is distancing herself from the far-right conspiracy theory amid increased media scrutiny.

"No, it doesn't represent me," Greene, who recently secured the GOP nomination in a heavily red district that will likely send her to Washington, said during an interview with Fox News in response to the “QAnon candidate” moniker she has been dealt.

"I don't expect a lot of the left-leaning media to change their stance," she said on Friday. "I think they're going to continue to attack me because they actually do see me as someone who's unapologetically conservative. And I won't back down on my beliefs and my values."  Source

Since her election, she has reclaimed her support of the group.  I remember David Duke denouncing the KKK in his run for President.  "I serve only the Lord now!"  That worked out for him. /S  jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif  

This is also a hoot worth watching:

Something else that she is failing to recognize is that the little group of R Congressmen with whom she trying to align herself couldn't care less about her presence there.  She's like the new kid in school who needs to make a name for herself and will do anything to do so.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
7  Hal A. Lujah    one week ago

For her next trick, she will put together a committee to locate and rescue all the children Hillary Clinton has molested / is molesting.

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7    one week ago

Wasn't that eating/has eaten?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
7.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Tessylo @7.1    one week ago

That will be her reason for the committee failing.  Hilary ate the evidence.  It’s hard to catch a crafty Clintonista.

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @7.1.1    one week ago

'Babies, they're what's for dinner'

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
7.1.3  NV-Robin6  replied to  Tessylo @7.1    one week ago

I think it's still a passive thing. I know I was accused recently by a former client that I was a baby killer. I don't know about you guys, but I've never molested a child, killed a baby or ate another human being in all my life and surely don't plan on it! This is such insane cowardice to foment this kind of crap. What sort of human beings are frickin' depraved they would think this up or even buy into this?

Thing is, what I am most angry with as how the rightwing sits idly by and lets this shit get out of hand cuz they think there's a benefit to it.. Well, they are about to see what this stupidity and complicit behavior will do to all their benefits.  This IS no game. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
7.1.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.2    one week ago
'Babies, they're what's for dinner'

For those who are literate, that's a modest proposal. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
7.1.5  Bob Nelson  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1.4    one week ago

A brobdingnagian Comment!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
7.1.6  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Bob Nelson @7.1.5    one week ago

Au contraire, lilliputian I Swiftly thought. 

 
 
 
Kavika
8  Kavika     one week ago

The upside is that GA elected two new senators that are sane. That helps to offset one nut case.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
8.2  NV-Robin6  replied to  Kavika @8    one week ago

Hallelujah Georgia!  Whoohooo!! Yep, there's many good things to keep in account. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9  Vic Eldred    one week ago

Impeachment on his first day in office?   It sounds so oddly familiar!

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @9    one week ago

Not really, how about this, 'I'm willing to give him a chance'

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @9.1    one week ago

That's a great sentiment - sounds like me.

What about the radical left?  Did they give Trump a chance?

 
 
 
JBB
9.1.2  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.1    one week ago

Of course Trump had a chance. He blew it...

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
9.1.3  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.1    one week ago

What Vic.... you don't remember the "I Love Me" victory tour Trump took right after becoming the president elect?  How's that for bringing people together.

And that was just for starters.....

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
9.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JBB @9.1.2    one week ago

Bullshit. There was impeachment talk before he even got inaugurated.

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @9.1.3    one week ago



Take a look at the date on the Washington Post front page: Inauguration Day 2017

 
 
 
Dulay
9.1.6  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.5    one week ago

Ooooo, a 'campaign'. What was the date the Articles were filed? 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
9.1.7  Bob Nelson  replied to  Dulay @9.1.6    one week ago

C'mon, Dulay!

You're forgetting a basic rule:
"No right-winger is responsible for anything anyone says... including themselves... and... all left-wingers are responsible for anything any left-winger says."

That's justice! A rule that applies to both sides!

Both sides do it! Both sides do it! Both sides do it! Both sides do it! Both sides do it! Both sides do it! Both sides do it!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
9.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.7    one week ago
".. all left-wingers are responsible for anything any left-winger says."

Did you pause for a second and reflect on your posting history before making this argument?   I mean for the guy who constantly posts pictures of individuals and argues they represent millions of people this seems.....

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
9.1.9  Bob Nelson  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.8    one week ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
9.1.10  NV-Robin6  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.1.1    one week ago

We were given no choice but to give him a chance and he blew it. Color me surprised you still don't see the difference between fact and fiction. I'm sure if Trump shot you on Fifth Avenue, you'd be happy he marked you. Obviously if you can't see the con, you're the mark and were. 

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
9.1.11  NV-Robin6  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.9    one week ago

That's exactly why he'll be forever on my block list.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
9.1.12  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JBB @9.1.2    one week ago
"Of course Trump had a chance. He blew it..."

Not only was he given a Chance, but the whole Community Chest.

OIP.9jqZAMQQDnzGK_RECuVRaQHaKY?pid=Api&rs=1

Sorry, I didn't want to MONOPOLIZE the conversation.

 
 
 
Kathleen
9.1.13  Kathleen  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.7    6 days ago

Can you say one side is absolutely “perfect”?

If not, then both sides do it.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
9.1.14  Bob Nelson  replied to  Kathleen @9.1.13    6 days ago
Can you say one side is absolutely “perfect”? If not, then both sides do it.

That's true... and misleading. The difference is very important. For example:

If Mr X lies 90% of the time, while Ms Y lies 10% of the time, it is "true" that they both lie.

But unless some sort of qualification is used, saying "They both lie" is very misleading, seeming to say that they behave similarly, when in fact they behave very differently.

 
 
 
Kathleen
9.1.15  Kathleen  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.14    6 days ago

Whatever you think the percentage is, it’s wrong on both counts. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
9.1.16  Bob Nelson  replied to  Kathleen @9.1.15    6 days ago

What do you mean? I gave an example, with no details. How can that be wrong?

Do you disagree with my reasoning? 

Mr X at 90%, and Ms Y at 10% are very different. Saying "They both do it" is very misleading.

No?

 
 
 
Kathleen
9.1.17  Kathleen  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.16    6 days ago

These percentages are your opinion only, not fact. So I can’t say it’s one side only. 

 
 
 
Dulay
9.1.18  Dulay  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.16    6 days ago

Come on Bob. 

UNLESS the scales are PERFECTLY balanced, the fact that one side has an ounce on it justifies the ton on the other side. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
9.1.19  Bob Nelson  replied to  Kathleen @9.1.17    6 days ago

We're not understanding each other. Let's try another approach.

I'm 6'6''. I used to have a teammate who was 7'4'''. It is true to say we're both tall... but misleading. We're not in the same category.

Most adjectives are like that. They need to be ''scaled’' to be meaningful. 

Mr X smokes a lot. Ms Y only smokes a little bit. So ''they both do it'', but they're at opposite ends of the smoker scale. Just saying ''They both smoke'', without any scaling, is misleading.

 
 
 
Kathleen
9.1.20  Kathleen  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.19    6 days ago

I do understand you, you are saying the right lied much more then the left. Then they both lied....even though ( you think) one lied more then the other. I may dislike the one that lies more though, if that is really true. 

Until one side is perfect, then I will always say both. Especially when it comes to politics, because we all know they are full of shit. 

Btw, you are the same height my dad was. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
9.1.21  Bob Nelson  replied to  Kathleen @9.1.20    6 days ago
you are saying the right lied much more then the left. 

No!

I haven't mentioned left or right. 

My topic has been the fallacious logic of using the same adjective in cases where it's misleading to do so.

''LeBron James and I both play basketball.'' That implies some similarity between him and me. I wish!

 
 
 
Kathleen
9.1.22  Kathleen  replied to  Bob Nelson @9.1.21    6 days ago

Obviously we are not connecting on this matter, so it’s best to move on. 

 
 
 
Ender
10  Ender    one week ago

Gotta laugh at trying to talk out of both sides of her mouth.

I condemn what these people are doing yet I will fight for them....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
11  Vic Eldred    6 days ago

 Impeachment should not be a frivolous impulse or retaliatory tool for the opposition. That goes for both parties

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
12  Paula Bartholomew    6 days ago

Maybe this whole thing will serve as an eye opener to other R's.  They have to know how batshit crazy she is and will step up instead of turning a blind eye.  The Ethics Committee needs to start doing their jobs and investigate her activities and any others who blatantly violate the oath of office that they took and think they are above the law.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

Tessylo
Just Jim NC TttH
gooseisgone
MAGA
Right Down the Center
FLYNAVY1
Drakkonis


44 visitors