No, Obama only got the US involved in wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine. Let us not forget his 2 troop surges in Afghanistan along with his shitty SOFA agreement tying the US to a weak, corrupt Afghan government. Or the fact Obama sent US troops back into Iraq to rearm and retain Iraqi troops for a second time; and save a government that is loyal to Iran. Not to mention his extra judicial drone killing program across the ME; including 2 US citizens w/o trial.
Who's pathetic?
The f'ing Democrats that have removable backbones.
One second screaming at Trump for trying to withdraw troops from Syria; so now they are still there in the middle of harms way. The next screaming that Trump didn't consult their corrupt, seditious, leaking asses about killing a known terrorist that has killed thousands, including US forces and personnel, and was openly plotting more attacks in Iraq and Syria.
Of course had not Trump acted the Democrat neocons and chicken hawks would have blasted Trump for ignoring Iranian terrorist activities.
But Trruuummmmppppp!!!!!!
Who's pathetic?
The moronic left that seem to think this won't all come back to bite them in their collective asses the next time a Democrat holds the White House.
I have been called Tex and Miss plenty of times without anyone getting a ticket!guess it just depends, huh?
Yes, it depends on whether it's done for the purpose of mocking.
Do you think that Tex is mocking of your screen name Tex? Have you told other members that you feel mocked when they call you Tex? Have you flagged those comments? I for one should have had dozens of tickets.
I can't see how you'd think that Miss is a mockery of your screen name but same questions.
If you want hypocrisy, which is what your video suggests, go back to 1999 and look at the videos of Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and Pelosi during the Clinton impeachment.
Seems like they feel none of that happened 20 years later.
You are too easy. [deleted] wants us to admit that Trump is a hypocrite. So maybe he is by his past tweets.
Of course, libs will never admit the same, especially by a few choice lib/prog/dems during the Clinton impeachment. Seems amnesia is the condition of order these days for prog/libs.
Of course, libs will never admit the same, especially by a few choice lib/prog/dems during the Clinton impeachment. Seems amnesia is the condition of order these days for prog/libs.
You inability to address Trump's hypocrisy without spewing whataboutism is noted, as is your failure to answer my question.
Never one for logic. You don't agree with the subject matter; you don't agree with the commenters; you're not a member of this group; you have added nothing even close to intellectual intercourse ... and you're telling others to leave? Does that even make sense?
It seems no one on the right is addressing the hypocrisy issue. trump is the king of hypocrisy.
All hypocrites have one thing in common: they're offended by the truth. Everyone hypocrite here doesn't have an ounce of self-respect or honor. President Obama ended the life of osama bin laden and trump can't even acknowledge that.
And I would worry about anyone who has loved ones being sent to the mideast. Given that trumplethinskin has told the world that he doesn't like people who were captured, I'm loathe to think that any Americans captured will be thought of as fodder for torture since the Traitor-In-Chief wouldn't like them enough to send reinforcements for rescue. He doesn't like people who are captured. And the five time deferment coward has stated that on the world stage.
I don't give a shit what any right leaner has to say. I don't put any weight whatsoever to those who don't have any pride, any dignity, any self-esteem. They would rightfully be outraged if President Obama would have done 1/100th of the shit that trump has done. I would have too. But those supporters are disgusting. There's a trump derangement syndrome alright. But it's the right.
Yes, there is a bit of hypocrisy there, but I don't remember you being upset about all of the comments Schiff, Scumer, Pelosi and no nads Nadler made during the Clinton impeachment, but seemed to have forgotten about those comments 20 years later.
What Trump did was justified and long overdue. Whether you accept that or not doesn't matter. The man was a fucking TERRORIST. Get it yet? A TERRORIST!
He was the second most important government official in Iran.
The head of the international organization charged with monitoring Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal said Iran is meeting its obligations under the accord and warned against states trying to influence verification activities. Less than three weeks later, the United States imposed sanctions against Iranian officials and institutions that Washington alleges are working to retain nuclear weapons-related expertise in Iran.
IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano cautioned in March that some nations' efforts to micromanage the nuclear agency's monitoring of Iran would threaten the credibility of its findings. (Photo: Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images)
“Iran is implementing its nuclear commitments,” said Yukiya Amano, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in March 4 remarks to the agency’s Board of Governors. Amano urged Tehran to continue adhering to the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
I do hope we can de-escalate this shit and avoid losing more lives.
Of course, so do I, but if Iran does retaliate and kills more Americans, do we take the route the left prefers and sit back, do nothing, and just hope they will go away. That has been their point of view for 40 years.
Iran to restart some nuclear activity in response to U.S. withdrawal from nuclear deal
GENEVA (Reuters) - Iran will restart part of its halted nuclear program in response to the U.S. withdrawal from a landmark 2015 nuclear deal but does not itself plan to pull out of the agreement, the state-run IRIB news agency reported on Monday.
Here what they say now after the killing of Soleimani:
Blowback: Iran abandons nuclear limits after US killing
By NASSER KARIMI , JON GAMBRELL and ZEINA KARAM Associated Press
JANUARY 5, 2020 — 11:59PM
TEHRAN, Iran — The blowback over the U.S. killing of a top Iranian general mounted Sunday as Iran announced it will no longer abide by the limits contained in the 2015 nuclear deal and Iraq's Parliament called for the expulsion of all American troops from Iraqi soil.
Blowback: Iran abandons nuclear limits after US killing
Iran was so in-compliance with the "Non-Binding" agreement by Obama and Crew (According to an inspector), it only took them a day or two to get things back on track again ?
What are the "Other" countries that signed-on and Praised this "Non-Binding" agreement, doing about Iran's …… "Threat" ?
The head of the international organization charged with monitoring Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal said Iran is meeting its obligations under the accord and warned against states trying to influence verification activities. Less than three weeks later, the United States imposed sanctions against Iranian officials and institutions that Washington alleges are working to retain nuclear weapons-related expertise in Iran.
IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano cautioned in March that some nations' efforts to micromanage the nuclear agency's monitoring of Iran would threaten the credibility of its findings. (Photo: Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images)
“Iran is implementing its nuclear commitments,” said Yukiya Amano, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in March 4 remarks to the agency’s Board of Governors. Amano urged Tehran to continue adhering to the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
This little link in the "Opinion Piece" (as you note it is)....is a fun read:
Institute for Science and International Security
Analysis of the IAEA’s Seventh Iran Nuclear Deal Report: Still Little Detail and Potential Verification Problems by David Albright and Andrea Stricker - September 1, 2017
This ones a Hoot too:
U.S. pressure or not, U.N. nuclear watchdog sees no need to check Iran military sites
Soooooo….the 2019 summary by the IAEA inspector, should make one wonder if they actually did their job to it's "Fullest" extent.
Is anyone? I'm never impressed by those who come into an article just to make ridiculous statements. I will never understand the mindset of someone who knows they don't agree with an article and author, who refuse to engage to intellectual intercourse, who refuse to offer something of substance, etc.
At times the word is incorrectly used to refer to anyone with controversial, or differing, opinions. Such usage goes against the ordinary meaning of troll in multiple ways. While psychologists have determined that the dark triad traits are common among Internet trolls, some observers claim trolls don't actually believe the controversial views they claim. Researcher Ben Radford wrote about the phenomenon of clowns in history and modern day in his book Bad Clowns and found that bad clowns have evolved into Internet trolls. They do not dress up as traditional clowns but, for their own amusement, they tease and exploit "human foibles" in order to speak the "truth" and gain a reaction. Like clowns in make-up, Internet trolls hide behind "anonymous accounts and fake usernames." In their eyes they are the trickster and are performing for a nameless audience via the Internet.
Researcher Ben Radford wrote about the phenomenon of clowns in history and modern day in his book Bad Clowns and found that bad clowns have evolved into Internet trolls.
So your preference is for appeasement, AKA sucking iranian crank.
This may surprise the fuck out of you but in the real world, not everything is black or white. Intelligent people recognize that interaction requires nuance.
I already knew that of course but it's better that you admit it.
Based on your comment, you don't know what you don't know.
Plus, we can now legitimately classify obummer as one of the world's foremost islamic terrorists by proxy.
So you're another vote for obummer sucking iranian crank. No surprise there. Gotta wonder about why someone would support the world's foremost islamic terrorist though.
Take your strawmen to someone who plays that game FW.
Go ahead and explain why so many Dems are so ready and willing to support an insane regime in Iran. Apparently more so then almost half of the population there.
I'm building an "I don't give a damn" in an attempt to prevent the bullshit that's being spewed on this thread from contaminating the computers that belong to the intelligent people using NewsTalkers. I hope your computer isn't affected by all of the right-wing shit.
The evidence here is overwhelmingly prima facie and the idea that you would attack somebody who supports US opposition to a manical despotic Iranian regime is further advancement of that.
Actually, there isn't FW. There is NO evidence that I attack anyone, there is plenty of evidence that I call out COMMENTS.
The mere idea that you label such opposition as insane defines the above referenced remarks.
Where did I do that FW?
Again, save your strawmen for those who play that game.
It is clear to everyone that some radical leftists are willing to sacrifice American lives in pursuit of their fascistic ideology at home.
Ditto for the radical alt right. Point?
Iran not unlike NK is a virtual prison to those opposed to the regime there. In contrast, those who here are welcome to make their full support by way of their relocation to that region.
It's hypocritical to question whether in the future, members will admit they were wrong and ignore the fact that Trump has never admitted he was wrong.
Obama didn't launch a strike on Iran OR any of their leadership. Nor did he threaten to attack their cultural centers.
So why are you (and others) here? You have nothing of substance to add, you want to bob and weave while leaving midget comments, your typical land on an article and leave troll shit in the aisles, just to say you did something that served no purpose.
Not one comment of substance. Sad. Deplorably, deplorably sad. For you. Because I enjoy the shit out of it.
Sorry, but every one of my comments have substance. Anytime the stupidity of the ideology of liberalism is pointed out, and it is regularly, there is much substance to be had.
In the video Trump did not accuse Obama of attacking Iran. Obama never said he would attack Iran. Trump made that shit up.
Nobody said Trump has attacked Iran. Butt Trump killed the head of Iran's military and has been rattling his saber ever since.
Trump has threatened to bomb Iran (including their "cultural sites" which is a war crime).
Iran vows revenge as Trump threatens Iraq with sanctions
UPDATED ON: JANUARY 6, 2020 / 10:51 AM / CBS NEWS
What you need to know
Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's elite Quds military force and one of the most powerful figures in the Islamic Republic, was killed early Friday in an airstrike in Baghdad. Thousands of people have mourned him in both Iraq and Iran.
The Iranian government says it will no longer abide by key terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, lifting restrictions on centrifuges, uranium enrichment and more. President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the deal in 2018.
The Iraqi Parliament approved a resolution calling on the government to expel some 5,000 U.S. troops from the country. President Trump said "we are not leaving unless they pay us back" for an air base in Iraq.
Mr. Trump says his administration "may discuss" releasing the intelligence that led to the strike on Soleimani.
Mr. Trump tweeted Saturday that the U.S. would target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliates for the strike.
The White House sent a formal notification to Congress about the airstrike as required by the War Powers Act.
Lawmakers are divided over the strike, with Republicans applauding Mr. Trump's action and Democrats warning about the possible repercussions.
Obama got Iran to sign the JCPOA. Trump shredded that agreement.
From Wikipedia: Under JCPOA, Iran agreed to eliminate its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium, cut its stockpile of low-enriched uranium by 98%, and reduce by about two-thirds the number of its gas centrifuges for 13 years. For the next 15 years Iran will only enrich uranium up to 3.67
(including their "cultural sites" which is a war crime).
He loves American war criminals. Hell, the people who come here because they feel they kick the dust up are entertainingly pathetic. Can't stay on other's like minded seeds, but they come here spouting the most ridiculous rhetoric. Love, love, love it!
Sigh....I understand most on the left is accustomed to being wrong, so this may come as a surprise to you...
this was today
Now, in the first frame of the video, it shows 23 people, give or take 1. In my original post, I stated there were 12. Another site updated the number at 1pm and said 10 more people showed. That put the number to 22.
Well, I guess the topic of this article (hypocrisy) eludes even the seeder.
i once veered off topic,
.
/.
/.
.
and lost my freight trane of thought,
so i cried
crocodile tears for hippos critical of my thought process or, cause i thought it would be food for thought
processing, till i remembered,
i don't have a food for thought processor, or even a process, to attempt to digest all the crap flung around here, like it was a prime example of the baboon section of the primate section of the safari, where crap is freely flung
like a flying nun,
in a silly sally field outfitted with a left of center right fielders choice, not chosen to be found in the section frozen, like a vegetable
Who is it that struck Iran "just before the election"?
As the Trumpsters will be quick to yammer about, Trump hasn't actually struck Iran (yet).
Right now Trump is merely on the warm up lap.
Sure, he's doing everything he can to provoke a war with Iran, like killing their top general and threatening to bomb 52 sites in Iran, butt it's not quite close enough to the election to actually start the war.
He loves to talk shit though and he's stirring the pot by threatening to commit war crimes. Butt, the Bone-Spur-inChief has to act tough for his twit wits for awhile to get them whipped up into crazed mob before he attacks.
Torches and pitchforks will go on sale soon at all Trump locations. They're the perfect gift for the crazy MFers in your family.
Who's pathetic?
TRUMP!
No, Obama only got the US involved in wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine. Let us not forget his 2 troop surges in Afghanistan along with his shitty SOFA agreement tying the US to a weak, corrupt Afghan government. Or the fact Obama sent US troops back into Iraq to rearm and retain Iraqi troops for a second time; and save a government that is loyal to Iran. Not to mention his extra judicial drone killing program across the ME; including 2 US citizens w/o trial.
Who's pathetic?
The f'ing Democrats that have removable backbones.
One second screaming at Trump for trying to withdraw troops from Syria; so now they are still there in the middle of harms way. The next screaming that Trump didn't consult their corrupt, seditious, leaking asses about killing a known terrorist that has killed thousands, including US forces and personnel, and was openly plotting more attacks in Iraq and Syria.
Of course had not Trump acted the Democrat neocons and chicken hawks would have blasted Trump for ignoring Iranian terrorist activities.
But Trruuummmmppppp!!!!!!
Who's pathetic?
The moronic left that seem to think this won't all come back to bite them in their collective asses the next time a Democrat holds the White House.
That's what I expected, Republican deflections.
Would you like to express an opinion about the topic of this article?
Did you watch the fucking video?
The memes are stupid. We know you can do better than that, right?
Meh...I thought he was better than that. Guess I was wrong.
The deflections are stupid.
Yes, the deflections are sad.
You're always wrong.
Memes are still stupid.
Come on [[Deleted]] we know you can do better. Don't disappoint...s/
Thanks for providing an example of a CoC violation.
I knew you wouldn't disappoint.
Butt don't worry I never flag comments.
How exactly is that a CoC? A shortening of your screen name? Really?
Yes. Really.
Since 2005 when NV was created, it was against the rules to mock avatars and screen names.
That tradition & rule has been and will be continued here on NT as a CoC violation. SP
"really? ... [blink. blink blink...]"
Well, that made no sense...
That's ridiculous.
Derp.
Derp.
But it's Wally. It's what he does.
Yep.
He said I'm deflecting from my own article.
I post dozens of comments about the Trumpsters deflections.
Yes, it depends on whether it's done for the purpose of mocking.
Do you think that Tex is mocking of your screen name Tex? Have you told other members that you feel mocked when they call you Tex? Have you flagged those comments? I for one should have had dozens of tickets.
I can't see how you'd think that Miss is a mockery of your screen name but same questions.
You're breaking my heart Tex.
No you're not ignoring Dulay's comments. Here's the proof you provided:
It was certainly easy to prove your comment was a lie. Maybe you should consider spamming someone else's threads.
What fun would that be? /sac
You've posted over a hundred comments on my last three articles.
Many of those comments were directed at me.
So, you're either spamming my threads or you're stalking me.
Are you spamming anyone else on NT?
I have an Apple MacBook so you can't peek in my windows.
Sorry, my bad. I shouldn't have suggested spamming someone else.
I don't want anyone to get spammed.
Well that whole ignoring thingy didn't last very long did it Tex?
It was brought to my attention by my chief of security.
He was concerned about the way you drone on and on and on and on and on and on and on....
I told him not to worry. Your kind of droning is just boring, not dangerous.
The duration of that thingy demonstrated the same staying power that Trump has.
Nope? You're not spamming me?
Then why are you posting so many comments on my content?
I guess that means you're stalking me.
I already have a NewsTalkers girlfriend - Cobalt.
TRUMP!
If you want hypocrisy, which is what your video suggests, go back to 1999 and look at the videos of Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and Pelosi during the Clinton impeachment.
Seems like they feel none of that happened 20 years later.
What was the word you used again?
Oh, yea...that's right..
Hypocrisy
How does the video suggest that al want's hypocrisy? Be specific.
You are too easy. [deleted] wants us to admit that Trump is a hypocrite. So maybe he is by his past tweets.
Of course, libs will never admit the same, especially by a few choice lib/prog/dems during the Clinton impeachment. Seems amnesia is the condition of order these days for prog/libs.
[deleted]
This is NOT your article.
Do NOT tell anyone to "go away".
I called for Clinton to resign (even before he was impeached).
That's what she said.
You inability to address Trump's hypocrisy without spewing whataboutism is noted, as is your failure to answer my question.
Nope, I'm a member of this group.
As did I. I didn't given a rat's ass about the blowjob; I cared only that he lied to Congress.
Never one for logic. You don't agree with the subject matter; you don't agree with the commenters; you're not a member of this group; you have added nothing even close to intellectual intercourse ... and you're telling others to leave? Does that even make sense?
Holy shit.
And we're lucky to have you.
Well the blowjob left a stain on the office (and a dress).
I just got tired of having to explain "oral sex" to my children.
If you gathered every haz mat specialist out there, they could not remove the stain on the office Trump has created.
I see you're still deflecting.
Care to comment on the video in this article?
It seems no one on the right is addressing the hypocrisy issue. trump is the king of hypocrisy.
All hypocrites have one thing in common: they're offended by the truth. Everyone hypocrite here doesn't have an ounce of self-respect or honor. President Obama ended the life of osama bin laden and trump can't even acknowledge that.
And I would worry about anyone who has loved ones being sent to the mideast. Given that trumplethinskin has told the world that he doesn't like people who were captured, I'm loathe to think that any Americans captured will be thought of as fodder for torture since the Traitor-In-Chief wouldn't like them enough to send reinforcements for rescue. He doesn't like people who are captured. And the five time deferment coward has stated that on the world stage.
I don't give a shit what any right leaner has to say. I don't put any weight whatsoever to those who don't have any pride, any dignity, any self-esteem. They would rightfully be outraged if President Obama would have done 1/100th of the shit that trump has done. I would have too. But those supporters are disgusting. There's a trump derangement syndrome alright. But it's the right.
Let's see where this takes us, shall we?
Yep.
There's also a Trump Deflection Syndrome.
I guess they can't defend the indefensible.
Hypocrisy
Yes, there is a bit of hypocrisy there, but I don't remember you being upset about all of the comments Schiff, Scumer, Pelosi and no nads Nadler made during the Clinton impeachment, but seemed to have forgotten about those comments 20 years later.
It does to the libs. Lord knows we don't want to hurt a terrorist's feeeeeeeeelings.
Gotta deflect.
Yep, that one is stupid, too.
Still can't discuss the video?
Aaaaaaand that one's stupid too.
I think you are wasting everyone's time by making them scroll through the stupidity.
Did Obama start a war with Iran? No.
Did Trump commit an act of war against Iran? Yes.
I'm not forcing you to stay here and waste your time.
He was the second most important government official in Iran.
Get it?
I know you can't handle the truth.
When were we attacked?
And you don't care that it constitutes an act of war.
The Iranians said it's an act of war and they have promised to retaliate.
Terrorists just killed an American soldier and two American contractor in Kenya. Please tell their loved ones that you don't care.
Another missile hit the green zone in Baghdad.
Butt Americans are safer right?
Americans have been asked to leave the area (because it's safer).
They better not get captured. Five time deferment Traitor in Chief will leave them there. He doesn't like people who get captured.
Been watching nothing but CNN and MSDNC again, huh?
That's why the Iranians use proxies to attack Americans and Israelis (and Saudis).
What Trump did is escalate the situation.
I hope it can be de-escalated (even though Trumps and his supporters are not interested in de-esculation).
Of course that is not true.
My belief is that by Trump doing what he did by taking out the terrorist, he let Iran know what to expect if they try anything stupid.
Trump saved American lives by taking out this POS. He was responsible for the deaths of thousands. Now, he's dead. He will no longer kill innocents.
If his successor tries anything, he will be in the same predicament.
His first words when he found out he was the successor?
"Aw shit!!"
Do you have an answer?
Making unfounded and irrelevant comments again, huh.
Not impressed.
You are accusing me of lying again, yet your boy Donald is the biggest liar in history.
I do hope we can de-escalate this shit and avoid losing more lives.
In 2016 Trump promised to get us out of these endless wars and bring our troops home.
I wish that was true.
Yet you still can't state WHEN the Iranians attacked the US.
Obama managed to get 20 sailors released.
I hope Trump doesn't get a bunch of Americans killed.
What is your preference?
War with Iran?
Neocons have wanted war with Iran for decades.
It appears that Trump is going to give them what they want.
Obama got Iran to sign the JCPOA which Trump has shredded.
Obama showed us that using sanctions and negotiating with Iran can yield results.
I guess we are going to find out what Trump's threats can accomplish.
" Non-Binding" is such a cowardly Greatness !
"Peace in our time" !
Iran adhered to the agreement until Trump ripped it up.
Are you afraid that Iran has Nukes...… now ?
Of course, so do I, but if Iran does retaliate and kills more Americans, do we take the route the left prefers and sit back, do nothing, and just hope they will go away. That has been their point of view for 40 years.
No, butt they're working on it again.
Here's what they said the Trump withdrew from the agreement:
Here what they say now after the killing of Soleimani:
Iran was so in-compliance with the "Non-Binding" agreement by Obama and Crew (According to an inspector), it only took them a day or two to get things back on track again ?
What are the "Other" countries that signed-on and Praised this "Non-Binding" agreement, doing about Iran's …… "Threat" ?
How do you know how long it will take for them to get "back on track".
I'm surprised that anyone would find Iran's intention to make nukes a laughing matter.
Well, no sane person would laugh about Iran getting nukes.
How do you know that they weren't always on track in the first place ?
'cause some inspector that wasn't allowed to go to certain places in Iran (Read Non-Binding Agreement) in the first place, said so ?
I already answered that question (comment # 7.2.39 author al Jizzerror replied to It Is ME @ 7.2.38 ).
Please read it this time.
You're "Fooling" yourself with that repeat of nothingness !
Reading is fundamental. This is part of the referenced document:
Understanding reality is being "Smart" (History ALWAYS proceeds word salads of the day).
"(Mis)Reading the IAEA reports on Iran's nuclear program"
Did you click on any of the "Backup" links in the article ?
This little link in the "Opinion Piece" (as you note it is)....is a fun read:
Institute for Science and International Security
Analysis of the IAEA’s Seventh Iran Nuclear Deal Report: Still Little Detail and Potential Verification Problems
by David Albright and Andrea Stricker - September 1, 2017
This ones a Hoot too:
U.S. pressure or not, U.N. nuclear watchdog sees no need to check Iran military sites
Soooooo….the 2019 summary by the IAEA inspector, should make one wonder if they actually did their job to it's "Fullest" extent.
That article is based on an opinion from the FDD (a conservative think tank).
The shit published by that stink tank is not reliable.
Is anyone? I'm never impressed by those who come into an article just to make ridiculous statements. I will never understand the mindset of someone who knows they don't agree with an article and author, who refuse to engage to intellectual intercourse, who refuse to offer something of substance, etc.
This may surprise the fuck out of you but in the real world, not everything is black or white. Intelligent people recognize that interaction requires nuance.
Based on your comment, you don't know what you don't know.
Drivel.
I do NOT share your preference.
I'm glad you have a hobby.
Why don't you post a list of the acts of war that Iran has committed against the US since 2000 so we can decide how to react?
Take your strawmen to someone who plays that game FW.
Why do you insist on spewing bullshit like that?
It's just fucking ridiculous.
Why are you so obsessed with "sucking crank"?
Who are you claiming will die because of Trump being removed from office? You don't seem to understand that your comment disses Pence big time.
Who has done that here FW?
Post some evidence of that FW. Any evidence.
I'm much more interested in why so many 'conservatives' are so ready and willing to support and insane regime in the United States.
That's only apparent to you apparently.
Please don't hold your breath waiting for that evidence.
So you have NO evidence yet you continue to spew the same stupid shit.
What's more stupid? You thinking everything on this thread is stupid or you for staying here and continuing to make ridiculous claims?
I'll take Bugsy for a thousand, Alex.
I should start commenting in this group more often. I understand there is more leeway as to the commenting style in the groups.
CB, you have been pinpointing stupidity. Keep up the good work.
I'm building an "I don't give a damn" in an attempt to prevent the bullshit that's being spewed on this thread from contaminating the computers that belong to the intelligent people using NewsTalkers. I hope your computer isn't affected by all of the right-wing shit.
Actually, there isn't FW. There is NO evidence that I attack anyone, there is plenty of evidence that I call out COMMENTS.
Where did I do that FW?
Again, save your strawmen for those who play that game.
Ditto for the radical alt right. Point?
Pffft.
My computer AND I are current on our vaccinations against RW BS.
For once, a tweet I can agree with. The EC unleashed this disaster on us.
Hypocrisy
Hypocrisy
Hypocrisy
Too many to count and too many to spend my time on. It's a beautiful day. I have lunch and love to make.
When has Trump launched a strike into Iran?
It's hypocritical to question whether in the future, members will admit they were wrong and ignore the fact that Trump has never admitted he was wrong.
Obama didn't launch a strike on Iran OR any of their leadership. Nor did he threaten to attack their cultural centers.
= Liberalism
Why attack when you can just dump pallets of cash off in the middle of the night?
That seemed to make things better, right?
So you still can't discuss the video?
So why are you (and others) here? You have nothing of substance to add, you want to bob and weave while leaving midget comments, your typical land on an article and leave troll shit in the aisles, just to say you did something that served no purpose.
Not one comment of substance. Sad. Deplorably, deplorably sad. For you. Because I enjoy the shit out of it.
Sorry, but every one of my comments have substance. Anytime the stupidity of the ideology of liberalism is pointed out, and it is regularly, there is much substance to be had.
Just because you can't deal with it...
I hate to see you getting bored with the deflections.
I made this meme for your amusement.
I think you meant "importance".
Sure I can. I love that you're always wrong.
All of Trump's videos are pathetic. This is just one more.
In the video Trump did not accuse Obama of attacking Iran. Obama never said he would attack Iran. Trump made that shit up.
Nobody said Trump has attacked Iran. Butt Trump killed the head of Iran's military and has been rattling his saber ever since.
Trump has threatened to bomb Iran (including their "cultural sites" which is a war crime).
Obama got Iran to sign the JCPOA. Trump shredded that agreement.
He loves American war criminals. Hell, the people who come here because they feel they kick the dust up are entertainingly pathetic. Can't stay on other's like minded seeds, but they come here spouting the most ridiculous rhetoric. Love, love, love it!
I understand there was yet another protest in DC against Trump today. There were about 12 people there.
There would have been millions, but most of the libs here in the US flew to Iran to attend the funeral of the dead terrorist.
More stupid bullshit.
This was Saturday in DC. Looks like at least 13 people.
Sigh....I understand most on the left is accustomed to being wrong, so this may come as a surprise to you...
this was today
Now, in the first frame of the video, it shows 23 people, give or take 1. In my original post, I stated there were 12. Another site updated the number at 1pm and said 10 more people showed. That put the number to 22.
Again, I am right.
Weakest shit I've ever seen here. Weak, weak, weak. And fuckin' desperate.
It's the dumbest shit I've seen.
But probably the most correct.
Prove it. Unless you meant the weak shit comment was most correct. Then in that case, you're finally right. Ha~!
Your comments prove you're desperate.
Nothing desperate about me. Liberals are mourning the killing of this terrorist.
THAT is a correct statement.
Aren't you just a little embarrassed about making such a ridiculous comment?
Well, being a Trumpster is a major embarrassment so it makes people used to being embarrassed all of the time.
After while they can spew bullshit on social sites and it doesn't even bother them.
Off topic. I'm waiting for the seeder to come and tell you that s/
Well, I guess the topic of this article (hypocrisy) eludes even the seeder.
The Hypocrite-in-Chief:
When has he sent kids to die?
We notice you would never dare put up a meme of Obama, who actually DID send kids out to die.
So lets see. Who is it that struck Iran "just before the election"? Well, it wasn't the previous prez was it?
As the Trumpsters will be quick to yammer about, Trump hasn't actually struck Iran (yet).
Right now Trump is merely on the warm up lap.
Sure, he's doing everything he can to provoke a war with Iran, like killing their top general and threatening to bomb 52 sites in Iran, butt it's not quite close enough to the election to actually start the war.
He loves to talk shit though and he's stirring the pot by threatening to commit war crimes. Butt, the Bone-Spur-inChief has to act tough for his twit wits for awhile to get them whipped up into crazed mob before he attacks.
Torches and pitchforks will go on sale soon at all Trump locations. They're the perfect gift for the crazy MFers in your family.
You know history.
The Republicans like to rewrite history.
Lindsey Graham is wearing flip-flops.
He called Trump a conman (and worse) in 2016.
Lindsey has been Trump's girlfriend since 2017.
Exactly. Apparently eating the corn out of Trumps shit is addictive.
Well put!
There may be some RWers here who would drink their "Fool-Aid" with that shit.