Leftist Mob Shows Up At Tucker Carlson's Home: 'You Are Not Safe'
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
On Wednesday night, a leftist mob showed up at Fox News host Tucker Carlson's Washington, D.C. home while he was on-air taping his show, "Tucker Carlson Tonight." In the video posted to social media by leftist group "Smash Racism DC," the angry mob outside Carlson's home chanted that they will "fight" him and demanded he leave town.
Carlson has a wife and four children.
"Activists ring doorbell, hold protest at the Washington DC area home of [Tucker Carlson], racist, sexist, bigoted FOX News personality. So far no one has opened the door," says a caption to one of the videos. "Tucker Carlson, we will fight! We know where you sleep at night!"
"We are outside your home to protest against your fascism and racism," the mob can be heard saying in the video.
"Tucker Carlson, we will fight, we know where you sleep at night!" they chant in unison.
Another caption from the group says, "'Racist scumbag, leave town!' Every night you spread fear into our homes—fear of the other, fear of us, and fear of them. Each night you tell us we are not safe. Tonight you're reminded that we have a voice. Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either."
"Racist scumbag, leave town," the group chants.
“Racist scumbag, leave town!”
Every night you spread fear into our homes—fear of the other, fear of us, and fear of them. Each night you tell us we are not safe. Tonight you’re reminded that we have a voice. Tonight, we remind you that you are not safe either. #KnockKnockTucker pic.twitter.com/QlNVKS4oxN — Smash Racism DC (@SmashRacismDC) November 7, 2018
"'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!' This is what we think of your racist rhetoric and fearmongering toward immigrants," reads another tweet's caption.
"You can’t hide from those you hurt, Tucker," said Smash Racism DC.
Carlson, who was apparently on-air while his home was targeted, did not make direct reference to the attack during Wednesday's show. But he did reference angry mobs "scaring your children" to a guest, seemingly in veiled connection to the mob reportedly at his home.
When Carlson signed off his show, he said he will be taking the next two days off. "I'll see you Monday," he told viewers.
Tags
Who is online
182 visitors
What a bunch of lunatics! What is wrong with people?
Leave the "town" of Washington D.C.? ROFL. Seriously? Who do you think you are? Where do you think are? Leave town? What century do you think this is?
But don't call them an angry mob. That's rude. Threatening someone is cool, but identifying a group of angry, threatening people as a mob is beyond the pale. Cue Brooke Baldwin.
If by "we" you mean illegal aliens, well, theoretically, you could be deported at any time, but is that "not safe?" If that's what you mean, Tucker doesn't do that; the law does that.
[Removed]
I want someone to defend this shit. If this is really what you think, you shouldn't be in this country, and I frankly don't understand why you would want to be here anyway.
There's an old saying:
What goes around comes around!
When? Should I organize a group in Brookline?
Where's your moral compass?
[deleted]
Many folks moral compasses work about as good a real compass does at the North Pole .....
When was Tucker Carlson camped outside someone's house with a mob demanding they leave town and threatening "we know where you sleep at night?"
No but he does have his mob threaten others. [Removed]
He told someone to form a mob and harass someone at their home?
'No borders! No walls! No USA at all!'
Brought to you by the "tolerant compassionate" Democratic party.
The Black Bloc anarchists are not part of the DNC. It is obvious as anarchists that they would oppose political states.
Obviously, We can't keep saying they have a "right" to protest. Stalking and intimidation are illegal and this problem is growing. This is "brown shirt" tactics pure and simple. Campus culture is now part of our daily lives. These so called protesters are violating the rights of others and need to be prosecuted.
Yep, put a few of them in the klink to become bubbas boyfriend and things might change.
Or not ..... some might like that ....
The radical left will always find a way to invoke 1A, even when stalking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage occurs:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mob-chants-threats-outside-tucker-carlsons-dc-home?fbclid=IwAR2e1k7I1KL4y07eqO-m6QXEumoWh4JzIf0BTq7ffr53B93meE5QcEVy0fc
Asshats!!
Holder, Maxine, and Hillary must be very proud of this.
Let's get some thugs to surround their homes
I perused the articles I could find related to this incident and could find no mention of how many folks constituted the mob.
As size seems to be in the eyes of the beholder, I wonder if someone might be able to answer and satisfy my idle curiosity.
It's not defined by how many people are involved, it's the nature of what they are doing.
nounI would disagree, if it was two or three morons involved that would not constitute a mob, it would be two or three morons.
[deleted,] I was not engaging you first of all secondly if you read my original comment I had already attempted to get a count. I was not attempting to minimize it, but qualify it.
Nice to see that Yiddish is still understood:)
At least by me and the person who flagged it. Sorry about that
Glad to see you took it in good humor.
I usually don't respond as such, but I was caught up in the moment
As it turns out the actual number was 20, more of a group of morons rather than a mob.
Regardless they really had no business behaving as they did.
How would you feel if it was your home they came to? I suspect you would have a vastly different opinion.
I thought I had covered that, but I suppose not. I do not believe in any of my comments on this thread I condoned their behavior, my query was to the amount of folks involved as to qualify as a mob.
Although 20 people showing up at my house for any reason would be unlikely, but if with ill intent, I'm Irish that should speak for itself.
Understood. I am part Mescalero Apache. Let somebody try that at my house in my neck of the woods down here on the AZ/Mexico border.
...
And a quick google search shows little to no reporting of this incident on CNN, NBC, CBS or ABC, etc ...... more empirical proof of how biased the mass media really is and remains.
Sad!
Wow what a stretch
If I had 7,400 square foot, $4 million dollar home, I would have security cameras, lots of security cameras......
But no ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. Embarrassing. Meanwhile they'll fill a show with how mistreated Jim Acosta was.
Apparently the 12 people killed in California is considered more important news by some.
It is literally EVERYWHERE! All you need to do is fricken google 'Tucker Carlson'!
I wonder if the gop will offer up their 'thoughts and prayers' again.
Of course it's more important, but I think they can walk and chew bubble gum, ya know? I went to those news sites and searched for the story without finding it. I looked again just now and found a story on CNN Business that was posted only 45 minutes ago.
I wonder if the Left will insist we pass a law outlawing magazines of a certain size.
CNN? I guess that proves it's fake news
From the CNN story:
Couldn't help himself. Couldn't just condemn the act. He had to slam Carlson, too.
Sorry, I've been watching TV news all day, switching from Fox to MSNBC & CNN
90% coverage of the shooting.
Nothing about Acosta anywhere.
Alternate stories have included the "ties" and recounts looming
as well as the Sessions - Whitaker stories.
Not much of anything else.
2:10PM CST all 3 networks switched to other topics
Kemp/Abrams
Sessions/Whitaker
Mueller report
2:55PM CST CNN
Brian Seltzer & Brook Baldwin decried the Carlson home being targeted and vandalized ( they spray painted some sort of symbol on the driveway )
FOX & CNN declared solidarity in condemning the protest as did Stephen Colbert.
3PM CST
Back to the Ventura shooting...
And you know it's an antifa group, how? Because Fox and Fools say so
Not much of a mob, they didnt even set anything on fire. The chanting seemed a little lethargic too.
I don't approve of any protest at the object of the protests home though. His wife should have called the cops.
Are you blaming the victim?
What about the thugs? Didn't Hillary Clinton say that they would become civil as soon as they took over the House of Representatives?
Don't know, is she still alive? relevant? or on topic? lol
Did SP remove any of Vic's comment for being off topic? No...
Fair and balanced …
You may want to look around the board and read the comments attributing certain behaviors to, i.e.
Heartland..... Tacos.... You're missing the issue entirely.
For conservatives, politics is a set of beliefs about how the country should run.
For "progressives", it's a religion. It's how they decide good from evil, righteous people from unrighteous, and believers from infidels. There is no behavior against the infidels that they consider to be out of bounds or off limits. Most of them see nothing wrong with this, and those that do will attempt to defend it anyway.....because......religion.
And …
Democrat "leaders", if there is such a thing, need to calm down their thuggish mob. Who knows, people with pitchforks and torches might just start showing up at their doors. Such behavior has become standard for the loony left.
And …
The radical left will always find a way to invoke 1A, even when stalking, intimidation, trespassing, and property damage occurs:
And …
Just another example of how their self-proclaimed tolerance and respect for all people is not genuine, but just a political tactic. If the politics of a person don't line up with them, their go-to is to attack them based on some immutable characteristic.
NOTE: In this thread, I denounced the act of demonstrating near to and/or on anyone's private residence; but the selectively-indignant among us, comment ONLY on the demonstrations that do not coincide with their politics or ideology.
By all means, denounce all that is inappropriate, illegal, ugly …
BUT DON"T CALL OUT ONE SIDE IN SUCH A WAY AS TO MAKE "OTHER SIDES" WITHOUT SIN.
So tell me when a right wing group went to some liberal politician or celebrities home and yelled and screamed and threatened both the celebrity and his family.
I'll wait!
While you're waiting, instead of selectively pulling out just a part of my comment, after which making it appear as though you a point … quote the portion that answers your disingenuous gotcha' question … namely …
"NOTE: In this thread, I denounced the act of demonstrating near to and/or on anyone's private residence; but the selectively-indignant among us, comment ONLY on the demonstrations that do not coincide with their politics or ideology.
By all means, denounce all that is inappropriate, illegal, ugly … "
But all right … since you're waiting …
In the early 1990s, anti-abortion extremists concluded that murdering providers was the only way to stop abortion. The first provider was murdered in 1993. Including the recent attack in Colorado, there have been 11 murders and 26 attempted murders due to anti-abortion violence.
Several of the doctors were attacked in their own homes. In 2009, NAF member Dr. George Tiller was shot and killed in his church in Wichita, Kansas. In 2015, a police officer and two people at a clinic were killed when a gunman entered a clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
And why limit this to "homes"? In Hebrew and Yiddish, the term for synagogue is …
בית כנסת bet kenesset, 'house of assembly' or בית תפילה bet tefila, "house of prayer", Yiddish: שול shul, Ladino: אסנוגה esnoga or קהל kahal), is a Jewish or Samaritan house of worship.
So spare me the equivocation and the "I'll wait" talking down; when Nazis, Skinheads and white nationalists vote as liberal democrats … do let me know.
Now, I'll wait.
On that we can agree.
I hear that the trespassers, should they be caught, will be charged with a hate crime. All of it sounds good but we really need to start prosecuting these people.
They can be obviously charged with trespassing and vandalism but I'm not seeing how it could be a hate crime. Political affiliation and workplace aren't a protected class. The hate crime specification only comes into play when the crime is based on the victim's race, creed, color, sex/gender, disability, ethnicity, and/or immigration. None of those apply in this situation.
Those that apply are:
Race - caucasian
Creed - conservative
Color - white
Sex/gender - male
Or does it take all seven you listed to qualify?
He was not targeted because he is white, male, or heterosexual and/or CIS. A person's creed refers to their religious affliiation and not their political party.
Maybe you need to learn how hate crimes laws work before you comment? Being a butt-hurt racist moron who wears bow ties isn't a protected class.
I might have to create a thread about what is and what isn't a hate crime because it seems that many people do not understand that legal concept.
Look up the definition of creed again, it covers religious and political beliefs.
How many "butt-hurt racist moron"s who wear bow ties need to be attacked and threatened before they can become a "protected class?
What site did you use?
According to the FBI, your political views/affiliation is not a protected class,
Locked until the seeder returns.....