╌>

Hemp industry expected to blossom under new Farm Bill

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  8 years ago  •  56 comments

Hemp industry expected to blossom under new Farm Bill
"This is a cultural shift," said one purveyor of cannabidiol, CBD, a compound derived from hemp.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



By   Dennis Romero

The U.S. hemp industry is expecting business to expand and investors to beckon after Congress on Wednesday passed   farm legislation   that included a provision to legalize and regulate the plant under the Department of Agriculture.

"This is a monumental bill for hemp farming," said Lauren Stansbury of the Hemp Industries Association.

The bill, awaiting President Trump's signature, opens the door to state-by-state regulation, removes hemp, which is part of the cannabis plant family, from the federal enforcement of outlaw drugs and gives hemp farmers access to banking, crop insurance and federal grants, experts said.

That could open the industry, which produces therapeutic cannabidiol (CBD), fabric, rope and even ethanol, to a wave of investment.

"This is a cultural shift," said Bomi Joseph, creator of CBD product ImmunAG. "CBD is going to explode. I think the market is going to triple in size."

Cannabidiol has been touted as an elixir that can do everything from cure cancer to tame menstrual cramps, but so far the U.S. Food and Drug administration has only approved a specific formulation of CBD to treat seizures associated with rare forms of epilepsy.

The bill "puts forth a whole-plant definition of hemp including extracts," said Stansbury of the Hemp Industries Association. "We’re not just talking stalk or flower. Any product derived from hemp is a legal consumer product."

But for now at least the FDA could stand in the way.

It states that CBD products can't be sold as dietary supplements and that those making medical claims are illegal without its approval. However, the FDA aims its most serious enforcement efforts at products "marketed for serious or life threatening diseases," according to a statement.

And the dietary supplement exclusion could be revisited, the administration has stated. "The FDA could allow it to be regulated as food and dietary supplements," said Shawn Hauser of the Colorado law firm Vicente Sederberg, which worked on the hemp legislation.

Under the bill, CBD products derived from hemp and containing 0.3 percent or less of the high-inducing cannabinoid THC will be considered legitimate.

"It would no longer be controlled under the DEA's purview," said U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration spokeswoman Mary Brandenberger.

Cannabis market data firm New Frontier recently projected that the American CBD market could reach $2.3 billion in revenues by 2022. Hemp-derived CBD (it can also come from other forms of cannabis) was expected to be worth more than half that total.

Read more at the seeded content


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.    8 years ago

I think I might give up NT in order to grow hemp. Why not?

 
 
 
dave-2693993
Junior Silent
1.1  dave-2693993  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

True story.

My maternal grandfather always mentioned the superiority of hemp ropes he learned to use on a merchant marine vessel during his escape from Russia to South America during his journey back to Philly. Then after a couple trips across the US on an Indian Motorcycle into the US Navy and some more nonsense in Cuba...

I hope I can write a novel before I pass.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.1.1  Krishna  replied to  dave-2693993 @1.1    8 years ago
My maternal grandfather always mentioned the superiority of hemp ropes he learned to use on a merchant marine vessel during his escape from Russia to South America during his journey back to Philly.

Well why not grow it? After all, it was good enuf for George Washington:

Yes, George Washington did grow hemp...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
1.1.3  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to    8 years ago

They used to sell hemp rope in my grandfather's hardware store. My dad still has a nice long piece of it and he still uses it like it was new.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
1.1.4  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.3    8 years ago

as long as it isn't allowed to dry out , and is appropriately oiled now and again , it should last for years , but it needs to be a plant based oil , not petroleum based. I still have some my grandfathers used back in the north east .

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Silent
1.2  lennylynx  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

Because you love your flock too much to leave us??  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago
"Why not?"

Absolutely why not.  Growing hemp would be a godsend to farmers, especially those who are losing their tobacco farms because of the decrease of smoking.  It grows like a weed, is disease and bug resistant, very hard to kill, and can grow in extreme climates.  I'm familiar with the fabric that can be produced from it.  It is coarser than most materials but it was used to make heavy bags that are stronger than burlap - which I know because that was my father's business. I cannot fathom the cruelty of governments in restricting the medicinal uses derived from hemp.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.3.1  Krishna  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @1.3    8 years ago
I cannot fathom the cruelty of governments in restricting the medicinal uses derived from hemp.

The problem is the Neanderthal thinking of  "Big Government Republicans"-- those who want to increase the size of the federal government by increasing its role in regulating morality-- Big Government Republicans  who are trying to limit the power of the states to legislate what their citizens want!

From restricting a women's right to decide what to do with her own body (for example, about an unwanted pregnancy) to restricting the rights of states who citizens want to legalize Marijuana. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.3.3  Rmando  replied to  Krishna @1.3.1    8 years ago

"The problem is the Neanderthal thinking of "Big Government Republicans"--"

So when did Obama push for legalizing pot laws? Did I miss that? Or when did Hillary make that part of her campaign platform? I think you're confusing all Republicans together with the establishment Democrats. There are lots of people on conservative and liberal sides that want to see pot and its derivatives legal once and for all.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.3.4  epistte  replied to  Rmando @1.3.3    8 years ago
So when did Obama push for legalizing pot laws? Did I miss that? Or when did Hillary make that part of her campaign platform? I think you're confusing all Republicans together with the establishment Democrats. There are lots of people on conservative and liberal sides that want to see pot and its derivatives legal once and for all.

Cough, cough,

The Trump administration, under Jeff Sessions, undid the Obama rollback of marijuana regulations. 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday rescinded an Obama administration policy that had eased enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states that legalized the drug, instead giving federal prosecutors wide latitude to pursue criminal charges.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.3.5  Split Personality  replied to    8 years ago
everyone has a place under the Republican tent. That does include criminals or those who attempt to enter the US illegally.

Really?  Color me, shocked !

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.3.6  Rmando  replied to  epistte @1.3.4    8 years ago

And Sessions is gone now. Plus he was one of those establishment types I was talking about. Obama could've just taken pot off the federal drug schedule if he'd been serious about it.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
1.3.7  epistte  replied to  Rmando @1.3.6    8 years ago
And Sessions is gone now. Plus he was one of those establishment types I was talking about. Obama could've just taken pot off the federal drug schedule if he'd been serious about it.

Obama could have done it but then he would have had the Republican Congress overrule it. An Executive Order is the weakest form of law because it prevents the POTUS from becoming a dictator. 

 
 
 
Rmando
Sophomore Silent
1.3.8  Rmando  replied to  epistte @1.3.7    8 years ago

Republicans by themselves wouldn't have had the votes to overturn it and there are some like Rand Paul who actually favor legalization. You'll just have to admit there are plenty of Democrats that don't have the guts to make it legal federally.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
1.3.9  livefreeordie  replied to  epistte @1.3.7    8 years ago

It was just one of the issues that keeps me from voting for Republicans.  The Establishment Republicans and so called conservatives have steadfastly refused to support true Constitutionalism by repealing these inane laws.

Glad there is a step forward in the right direction

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Participates
1.3.10  Gordy327  replied to    8 years ago
a woman was free to do with her body whatever she so desired....even getting a very late term abortion.

No, a woman is not free to get a late term abortion unless it's out of medical necessity. Most states have laws prohibiting elective late term abortions. 

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
Freshman Silent
1.3.11  Transyferous Rex  replied to  Krishna @1.3.1    8 years ago
The problem is the Neanderthal thinking of  "Big Government Republicans"-- those who want to increase the size of the federal government by increasing its role in regulating morality-- Big Government Republicans  who are trying to limit the power of the states to legislate what their citizens want!

Exactly what Stevens says in his opinion in Gonzales v. Raich. Nope, never mind, he actually said that the commerce clause allows the feds to do whatever the hell they want. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.4  Krishna  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1    8 years ago

I think I might give up NT in order to grow hemp. Why not?

Well, as they might say on Wall St-- one word: "moat".

(What is the chance you can achieve enough "economy of scale" to compete with the large corporations?).

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.4.1  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @1.4    8 years ago

(What is the chance you can achieve enough "economy of scale" to compete with the large corporations?).

And while some people feel that legalization would hurt tobacco and/or alcohol corporations-- but those YUGE corporations don't have to worry as they will simply buy up the Cannabis companies. 

For example:

Which Big Consumer Product Companies Really Are Entering the Cannabis Industry ?

After much waiting and monitoring, we are seeing some mainstream companies publicly dive in.  Constellation’s $3.8 billion investment in Canopy Growth is essentially shouting from the rooftops that alcohol companies were officially getting into the cannabis mix. MolsonCoors, Heineken and -- if rumors are true -- soon Diageo are making key investments and alliances to carve out their place within the cannabis industry. Instead of being stigmatized for entering this space, alcohol companies not carving out their place in cannabis are quickly being viewed as behind the curve, not forward-looking or ripe to be disrupted. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.4.3  Krishna  replied to  Release The Kraken @1.4.2    8 years ago
The True connoisseur prefers a small outdoor organic grow, hand trimmed and cured with care.

Good point!

"Craft Marijuana"...!!!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Release The Kraken @1.4.2    8 years ago

National Beer Sales & Production Data - Brewers Association


Summary. Overall U.S. beer volume sales were down 1% in 2017, whereas craft brewer sales continued to grow at a rate of 5% by volume, reaching 12.7% of the U.S. beer market by volume. Craft production grew the most for microbreweries.

Craft Beer's Days of Explosive Growth Are Over | Fortune


fortune.com › Retail › Craft Beer
Mar 27, 2018 - All totaled, the craft beer industry saw sales of $26 billion, or 23.4% of the overall beer market. ... Percentage growth has slowed, though.

2017 Craft Brewing Growth Statistics Released by the Brewers ...


...
Mar 27, 2018 - According to the BA report, small and independent craft brewers saw a 5 percent rise in volume of beer in 2017. The number of operating ...

People Aren't Super Excited About Beer Right Now


› News
Jul 3, 2018 - For the first half of 2018, the sales volume of craft beer at large-scale retail stores is up just 1.7 percent according to data from market research ...

Off-Premise Craft Beer Sales Grew 6 Percent in 2017 | Brewbound.com


Mar 1, 2018 - Sales of craft beer grew 6 percent in the U.S. last year, industry consultant Bump Williams shared during Thursday afternoon's Brewers ...

IRI Worldwide: Craft Beer Sales Up Narrowly Through Mid-Year ...


Jul 2, 2018 - Midway through 2018, off-premise volume sales of craft beer across a variety of large-scale retail stores are up just 1.7 percent , according to ...

The craft beer industry's buzz is wearing off - The Washington Post


Apr 10, 2018 - With more than 6,300 breweries operating in the United States in 2017, small and independent brewers represented nearly 13 percent of the market share by volume of the overall beer industry.
 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
1.4.6  seeder  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to    8 years ago

OK I confess.. I am a beer snob. But we have some amazing breweries all over Long Island. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.4.8  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.4    8 years ago
"The craft beer industry's buzz is wearing off - The Washington Post"

Well, I do feel I'm deteriorating a bit.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Silent
2  Dean Moriarty    8 years ago

Takes government forever to restore freedom once it strips it from us for no good reason. We should all be ashamed that we allow them to get away with this type of restrictions on our freedom. 

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
2.1  epistte  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2    8 years ago
Takes government forever to restore freedom once it strips it from us for no good reason. We should all be ashamed that we allow them to get away with this type of restrictions on our freedom. 

It was conservatives who regulated and banned weed. 1970 Controlled Substances Act.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  epistte @2.1    8 years ago
It was conservatives who regulated and banned weed. 1970 Controlled Substances Act.

The 1970 CSA was enacted by the 91st US Congress. Both chambers were held by a Democrat majority.

Further, the 1970 CSA includes more than just marijuana:

The  Controlled Substances Act  (CSA), Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, is the legal foundation of the government's fight against the abuse of  drugs  and other substances. This law is a consolidation of numerous laws regulating the manufacture and distribution of  narcotics ,  stimulants ,  depressants ,  hallucinogens ,  anabolic steroids , and chemicals used in the illicit production of controlled substances. The act also provides a mechanism for substances to be controlled, added to a schedule, decontrolled, removed from control, rescheduled, or transferred from one schedule to another. [2]

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
2.1.2  epistte  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.1.1    8 years ago

The House Member who sponsored it also supported censorship. He tried to get the radio station manager who played a John Lennon song arrested for dropping the F-bomb.  

In 1973, Staggers heard on the radio the John Lennon song " Working Class Hero " — which includes the lines "'Til you're so fucking crazy you can't follow their rules" and "But you're still fucking peasants as far as I can see" — on WGTB and lodged a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). [1] The manager of the station, Ken Sleeman, faced a year in prison and a $10,000 fine, but defended his decision to play the song saying, "The People of Washington, DC are sophisticated enough to accept the occasional four-letter word in context, and not become sexually aroused, offended, or upset." The charges were dropped.
 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Jasper2529  replied to  epistte @2.1.2    8 years ago
The House Member who sponsored it also supported censorship. He tried to get the radio station manager who played a John Lennon song arrested for dropping the F-bomb.  

Please don't try to move the goal posts, epistte. It doesn't matter who sponsored it or what s/he supported .  In comment  2.1.1   I directly replied to your comment 2.1 where you accused all congressional conservatives of "banning weed" via the 1970 Controlled Substances Act. I proved that the 1970 CSA included far more than weed.

I further proved that Democrats controlled both congressional chambers in 1970.

There's no way that you can blame conservatives for the law that majority Democrats enacted. 

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
2.1.4  livefreeordie  replied to  epistte @2.1    8 years ago

FDR and Democrats made Marijuana illegal. Republican Establishment and Conservative are complicit for continuing this attack on liberty

“On August 2, 1937 President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, the first federal marijuana law, which prohibited the substance beginning in October of that year (yes, that’s how they spelled marijuana back then). It effectively banned the possession of pot by requiring users to obtain a tax stamp, which they couldn’t buy without providing details about the amount and location of their marijuana, thereby incriminating themselves in the process.

While the law was overturned by the Supreme Court and was officially repealed by Congress in 1970, Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act simultaneously — thus ensuring that marijuana remained illegal. The prohibition continues to this day at the federal level, though a growing numbers of states have chosen to legalize marijuana for medical or recreational uses.

The primary case made against marijuana by the federal government was that its use had become “a national menace” in the words of Harry Anslinger, the commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (DEA predecessor)

Aside from raising concerns about the effects of marijuana, Anslinger stoked cultural fears by citing several instances of minorities using the drug before committing crimes, leading some to allege that racial bias played a role in its prohibition. Increasing numbers of Mexicans were immigrating to the U.S., and the use of marijuana was common among those who worked on farms in the southwest and western parts of the country. Additionally, a concentrated type of marijuana known as hashish was used by some immigrants from the Middle East and surrounding regions.”

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
2.1.5  epistte  replied to  livefreeordie @2.1.4    8 years ago

The SCOTUS overruled FDR.

On August 2, 1937 President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 , the first federal marijuana law, which prohibited the substance beginning in October of that year (yes, that’s how they spelled marijuana back then). It effectively banned the possession of pot by requiring users to obtain a tax stamp, which they couldn’t buy without providing details about the amount and location of their marijuana, thereby incriminating themselves in the process. While the law was overturned by the Supreme Court and was officially repealed by Congress in 1970, Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act simultaneously — thus ensuring that marijuana remained illegal. The prohibition continues to this day at the federal level, though a growing numbers of states have chosen to legalize marijuana for medical or recreational uses.
 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
2.1.6  epistte  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.1.3    8 years ago
There's no way that you can blame conservatives for the law that majority Democrats enacted. 

The parties weren't the same as they are now. Southern Democrats might have been liberal economically but they were social conservatives.  The Republicans were actually pragmatic conservatives instead of Neo-Conservatives or TEAparty members.  Hillary would have been a Republican if she were a politician in the 1940s. Only the northern Democrats were liberal/progressive. 

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.7  Jasper2529  replied to  epistte @2.1.6    8 years ago

Moving the goal posts again? 1970 was a mere 48 years ago, but I suppose that's ancient history for some people.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
2.1.8  epistte  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.1.7    8 years ago
Moving the goal posts again? 1970 was a mere 48 years ago, but I suppose that's ancient history for some people.

The Nixon administration was the start of the Southern Strategy to flip the socially conservative southern Democrats who still supported racism to the GOP.   The south flipped from blue to red over the next 25 years.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.9  Jasper2529  replied to  epistte @2.1.8    8 years ago

I see that you're still trying to move the goal posts away from my original posts. Sorry, that doesn't work with me. Bye.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
2.1.10  Jack_TX  replied to  livefreeordie @2.1.4    8 years ago
continuing this attack on liberty

Well....I don't generally describe it that way, but that's what it is.

I guess we didn't learn our lesson from prohibition.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1.11  MrFrost  replied to  livefreeordie @2.1.4    8 years ago
Aside from raising concerns about the effects of marijuana, Anslinger stoked cultural fears by citing several instances of minorities using the drug before committing crimes

Meh, the only crimes I see people smoking large quantities of weed are raiding the dorritos aisle at the local 7-11. 

Just out of curiosity, Larry, do you personally think weed should be legal? 

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
2.1.12  livefreeordie  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.11    8 years ago

I’ve stated several times that as a minarchist libertarian I oppose all drug laws

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3  devangelical    8 years ago

Ground was broken 3 years ago in southeast Colorado for a privately owned $1 billion hemp processing facility that is now nearing completion. According to a principal that I spoke to, some of the reasons the site was selected was because of it's proximity to geographical center of the US, it was fed by rail from the midwest, and the town gave the company 200 acres to build the facility upon. This facility has the capacity to process all the potential hemp grown in the US starting in the summer of 2019. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  devangelical @3    8 years ago

It's an amazing under valued resource that's far healthier for our planet than other things like cotton or corn that strip the land of nutrients. Hemp can be grown in "no-till" conditions since it doesn't strip all the nutrients and can actually achieve a natural balance and be grown on the same plot of land in perpetuity instead of needing to be rotated like most crops.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
4  Ender    8 years ago
On an annual basis, 1 acre of hemp will produce as much fiber as 2 to 3 acres of cotton. Hemp fiber is stronger and softer than cotton, lasts twice as long as cotton, and will not mildew.

Cotton grows only in moderate climates and requires more water than hemp; but hemp is frost tolerant, requires only moderate amounts of water, and grows in all 50 states. Cotton requires large quantities of pesticides and herbicides--50% of the world's pesticides/herbicides are used in the production of cotton. Hemp requires no pesticides, no herbicides, and only moderate amounts of fertilizer.

On an annual basis, 1 acre of hemp will produce as much paper as 2 to 4 acres of trees. From tissue paper to cardboard, all types of paper products can be produced from hemp.

The quality of hemp paper is superior to tree-based paper. Hemp paper will last hundreds of years without degrading, can be recycled many more times than tree-based paper, and requires less toxic chemicals in the manufacturing process than does paper made from trees.

Hemp can be used to produce fiberboard that is stronger and lighter than wood. Substituting hemp fiberboard for timber would further reduce the need to cut down our forests.

Hemp can be used to produce strong, durable and environmentally-friendly plastic substitutes. Thousands of products made from petroleum-based plastics can be produced from hemp-based composites.

It is stupid not to allow this to be grown. Higher yield, quicker turnover. Would save the forests. Hemp can be used for almost everything. Clothing, paper, rope, biofuel, even carpet/rugs and for nutrition. It can even be used in home construction.

70% of the Cannabis Plant total weight is made up of the 'hurd' or woody inner core. This part of the plant is THC free (i.e. Hemp) and is used in housing construction. The silica leached from the soil by the plant combined with unslaked lime forms a chemical bond similar to cement which is fire and water proof. Cannabis Homes
 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.1  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @4    8 years ago
used for almost everything. Clothing,

Not sure how comfortable that would be. Especially in the summer when I go commando most of the time... Don't think it would be all that comfortable on my junk.. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
5  Ender    8 years ago

Tmi...TMI...   hahaha

Funny thing is, I have seen hemp socks that are made with cotton added.

A supposed benefit though,

Hemp fibers have a strong antimicrobial, antifungal and antibacterial effect which is why medical socks protect your legs unpleasant smells.

(For  4.1  )

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.1  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @5    8 years ago
Hemp fibers have a strong antimicrobial, antifungal and antibacterial effect which is why medical socks protect your legs unpleasant smells.

I wash regularly...ENDER.. LOL 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7  MrFrost    8 years ago

I noticed above that people had strayed from the meat of the article, hemp, so I hope I am afforded the same latitude. 

Before two months ago, I had not tried weed since I was in high school...1984-ish. Had to roll your own, and being rookies, it was more of a joke than actually getting high. After three times, I decided it simply was not for me. 

Couple months ago I was talking to my neighbor about my arthritis and she suggested that I try a cbd tincture. I was surprised, it actually did help. So, I decided to step it up a notch and went with her to the local weed store, (it's legal for recreational use here in WA.). Couple of things surprised me..

1) The place was incredibly clean, I mean, doctors office clean. 

2) No matter who walks in the door, they check the ID. 

3) The people behind the counter will only help one customer at a time, if you are not being served, they ask you to stay back 3 feet from the counter, (but you are welcome to look at their stock in the books they have). 

4) Everything is cash based. No checks. No debit cards. Since most banks are FDIC, they cannot accept money that came from the sale of a substance the government says is illegal... No problem, they have ATM machines in the store. 

I am not a smoker, never have been, but they have "edibles", which is fine. All ratios are 1:1. 1mg THC to 1mg CBD. So I bought a package of salted caramels. 10 for $45.00. Each "candy", is 10mg. And since I was curious...a package of 10 joints, (they pre-roll them.....no shit! See pics at the bottom), even though I am not a smoker....I figured, what the heck. 

So we get back in her car and I open the caramels....and I could not for the life of me, open the damn package. They don't have a tear line, they aren't perforated. The manufacturer wants to make sure that kids are NOT going to accidentally open one and eat one. Anyway... She had a pair of scissors in the glove box so I ate one. She told me to eat half, but....what the heck. An hour later? Nothing.... So I ate half of another one.. Hour later? Absolutely NO arthritis pain at all. None. First time in years I have felt that good. But I admit, 15mg of thc was probably a little over the top. Doing complex math was pretty much out of the question for the rest of the day BUT, I slept like a baby and completely pain free. 

As far as hemp goes? Why it's even an issue is beyond me. 

So a picture.. Sorry for the quality...my phone camera has been acting odd of late. 

Package of caramels, with one on the side, and a package of joints. 

Seriously, weed needs to be legal nation wide. It really helps with chronic, (HA!) pain issues. Some added bonuses? I have re-acquainted myself with reggae music and The Wall has an all new meaning for me. 

512

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
7.2  Split Personality  replied to  MrFrost @7    8 years ago
Had to roll your own, and being rookies, it was more of a joke than actually getting high

I was that guy in High School who stapled the ends....

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @7.2    8 years ago

.... too much shake, better saved for the bong.

I was the guy that could roll a 1 paper zigzag while driving. In the early 70's a parked car filled with friends was a big red flag for the local LEO's at a high school rated in the top 3 nationally for availability. Back then you could get busted for possessing drug paraphernalia by having rolling papers, unless you had a tin of tobacco too, Bugle Boy. No pipes allowed in my car and a dump hatch under the carpet behind the shifter. My weakness was Columbian and Thai stick. Columbian came from the local guidos and the Thai stick from others older brothers returning from the far east. My niece is married to the son of the student narc me and my friends outed in high school in '73. Makes the rare family get-togethers a little awkward. Funny how shit turns out later.

 
 

Who is online




83 visitors