Tucker Carlson Obtains Jan. 6 Riot Footage, Prompting Anger From Democrats

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  one month ago  •  307 comments

By:   Natalie Andrews (WSJ)

Tucker Carlson Obtains Jan. 6 Riot Footage, Prompting Anger From Democrats
Fox News host says his producers have access to more than 40,000 hours of security tapes

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Fox News host Tucker Carlson said he has possession of thousands of hours of security-camera footage from the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, sparking anger from Democrats who called the development dangerous.

Mr. Carlson said on the air Monday night that his show has been given more than 40,000 hours of footage, and he said producers have been looking through the material and will provide coverage of its findings next week. Mr. Carlson has questioned whether investigators including the House Jan. 6 committee created to probe the attack have provided an accurate portrayal of the events that day.

Mr. Carlson said Monday night on his show that his producers have “unfettered” access to the security video from the day.

Capitol Police didn’t directly respond to questions about who provided the footage to Mr. Carlson. Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger said, “When Congressional Leadership or Congressional Oversight Committees ask for things like this, we must give it to them.”

A spokeswoman for the Republican-led House Administration Committee, which oversees Capitol security, referred questions to the office of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.), whose spokespeople didn’t respond to questions. 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) said the Democrat-run  Jan. 6 select committee , which issued its final report last year, had reviewed the security footage with “numerous protocols in place to protect the safety” of lawmakers, police officers and staff. He said there is “no indication that these same precautionary measures have been taken in connection with the transmission of the video footage at issue.”

A Fox News spokeswoman referred reporters to Mr. Carlson’s on-air remarks. Mr. Carlson declined to offer further comment.

On Jan. 6, 2021, pro-Trump supporters attempted to stop the certification of  Joe Biden ’s electoral-college win by breaking down police barriers and storming into the Capitol, damaging property and causing a delay in the proceedings as lawmakers and Vice President  Mike Pence  rushed to safety. About 140 Capitol and Washington, D.C., police officers were injured as a result of the attack, according to a bipartisan Senate report. 

Fox Corp. and News Corp, the parent of Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones & Co., share common ownership.

During hearings on the Capitol attack last year, the Jan. 6 committee showed some security video from Jan. 6, including footage of rioters roaming the building.

The  committee’s final report concluded  that Mr. Trump disseminated false allegations of fraud related to the 2020 election, provoking supporters to violence at the Capitol. Many Republican lawmakers disputed the findings of the Jan. 6 committee and said that Democrats who controlled the House at the time should have taken precautions to better secure the Capitol. 

The Journal reported earlier this year that the Justice Department  has charged more than 900 people  for connections to the riot, extracting guilty pleas from at least 450 of them on crimes ranging from unlawfully parading in a Capitol building to assault, obstruction and sedition. More than 180 rioters have been sentenced to jail time.

Mr. Trump  was impeached in the House  on a count of inciting an insurrection. He was acquitted in the Senate. Mr. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and has continued to falsely maintain that the election was stolen.

Mr. Carlson, in his remarks to viewers on Monday about the video footage, said the show’s producers “have been looking at this stuff and trying to figure out what it means and how it contradicts or not the story we’ve been told for more than two years” about what happened on Jan. 6. 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    one month ago

Carlson has long talked about getting this footage.

Remember:  " Democracy dies in darkness"   (Washington Post's motto)

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    one month ago

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    one month ago

I am sure Tucker will be as impartial as the Jan 6th committee.

Democrats should be scared shitless.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @2    one month ago

I can't wait for his show on this one!

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    one month ago

“I can't wait for his show on this one!”

Like every episode, repeat episode, as it is but a scripted running monologue and the last thing but news. It will be but a shitshow of the same tired, highly edited tropes to fit the narrative.

Enjoy being duped, vic…whatever brings you and yours some warped sense of vindication and validation. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    one month ago

He only offers a perspective.

I'm not afraid of ideas.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Ender  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    one month ago

As long as they think they can somehow get the Libs, is all they care about.

Even if it makes them look like idiots in the process...

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.4  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    one month ago

“I'm not afraid of ideas.”

Nor is any reasonable citizen. He is not reasonable. He is vapid. He has an agenda. He is playing you and anyone else who is willing to buy into his brand of spreading ‘ideas’ (read conspiracies). 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.4    one month ago

It certainly sounds like you're afraid

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    one month ago
I'm not afraid of ideas.

... especially seditious ones.

 
 
 
gooseisback
Sophomore Silent
2.1.7  gooseisback  replied to  afrayedknot @2.1.1    one month ago
the same tired, highly edited tropes to fit the narrative.

What do you think we have been listening to for the past 2 years. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  gooseisback @2.1.7    one month ago
What do you think we have been listening to for the past 2 years. 

Hey, c'mon, man, you've been here long enough to know it is different when Democrats do it.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.9  Ronin2  replied to  Ender @2.1.3    one month ago

Really, after the shit show the Democrats have put this country through for the last 7 years and counting?

Time for a very large dose of their own medicine.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.10  Ender  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.9    one month ago

The Dems were/are not the shit show.

There is a thing I call the republican blinders.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.1.11  cjcold  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    one month ago
I'm not afraid of ideas.

I'm afraid of armed redneck high school dropouts who believe his ideas.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Sophomore Principal
2.1.12  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @2.1.11    one month ago

I'm sorry, it's terrible to go through life afraid.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.13  devangelical  replied to  cjcold @2.1.11    one month ago

I'm afraid that I might get some of them on me...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Sophomore Principal
2.1.14  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @2.1.13    one month ago

Are there a lot living around you?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.15  Ronin2  replied to  Ender @2.1.10    4 weeks ago

Only from the view of partisan lefties are Democrats not a complete shit show.

Or are you going to pretend Democrats weren't calling for Trump to be impeached before he even took office? That the whole Russian Collusion investigation wasn't an investigation of a hoax started for by a paid political hit piece that had no basis in reality by Hillary Clinton? That the first impeachment wasn't over hearsay pieced together by a Democrat operative in the White House? That Democrats gave more credence to an ambassador that had bad mouthed Trump in front of Ukrainian leadership; who Trump then removed.  That Democrats ignored that a president can remove an ambassador at any time for any reason? That the whole rush to impeach Trump a second time was based off of Democrat feelings; w/o one damn shred of evidence that Trump had anything to do with the planning of Jan 6th? That the entire Pelosi hand picked TDS partisan Jan 6th committee that hired a tv producer to make their presentation more impactful for prime time wasn't completely full of shit? That it had no other mission than to "get Trump at all costs"?

Democrats and those that support them are the problem, period. 

Past time they were held accountable.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.16  Ender  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.15    4 weeks ago

So keeping on with the trump revenge tour I see.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.17  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.15    4 weeks ago

Your PD&D is so predictable and tiresome.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.1.18  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.17    4 weeks ago

As is your comment parroting PD&D

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Ronin2 @2    one month ago
I am sure Tucker will be as impartial as the Jan 6th committee.

So why was it released only to Tucker?  Why wasn't it made available to other news agencies?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2    one month ago

Ask the Jan 6th Committee

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.2  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.1    one month ago

The January 6th Committee did not release the footage to Tucker Carlson.  McCarthy did.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.2    one month ago
The January 6th Committee did not release the footage to Tucker Carlson.

That's the point: THEY DIDN'T RELEASE THE FOOTAGE AT ALL!

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.4  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.3    one month ago

Nor should they have.   

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.4    one month ago

Why not?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.6  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.5    one month ago

If it's being used in prosecutions, then it should not be released until after all trials are over.  Conservatives want the videos released so they can do what they do best which is twist and contort everything to fit their views.  What Tucker will say about the videos probably never happened in the videos since TUCKER CANNOT BE TRUSTED PER FOX NEWS ATTORNEYS.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.7  Ozzwald  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.6    one month ago
What Tucker will say about the videos probably never happened in the videos since TUCKER CANNOT BE TRUSTED PER FOX NEWS ATTORNEYS.

AND with no other news agency having that footage, Tucker is free to make up whatever he wants to say, with no fear of being called out on falsehoods.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.8  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.6    one month ago

This event took place in 2016. The defendents languished in jail a long time waiting for trials.

The complete footage must be released.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.9  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.1    one month ago
Ask the Jan 6th Committee

Why are you getting up votes for a statement that is so obviously false?  Anyone with even a basic understanding of this story, knows that it was McCarthy releasing them, not the Jan. 6th committee.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.10  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.8    one month ago

You'll never get the complete footage.  Do you really think that Fox "News" and Tucker "I can't be trusted" Carlson will release unedited footage?  They may tell you they are, but they won't because they are liars.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.11  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.9    one month ago

It's a factual statement, The Jan 6th Committee had every chance to release it.

I'll ask you again: Why didn't they?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.12  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.10    one month ago
they won't because they are liars.  

In the past 6 years the "liars" turned out to be Hillary Clinton, our intell & FBI leaders, the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC and Joe Biden.

Every one else gets a shot now.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.13  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.12    one month ago

Oh, yeah, the Clintons who the conservatives have been going after for 30 years with nothing to show for it.   Our intell and FBI leaders did nothing wrong except go after someone you BELIEVE is above reproach.  As for the news agencies, Fox, OANN, NewsMax, Daily Mail, Just the News, etc., have done nothing but lie to conservatives and you people eat it up so don't give me your partisan bullshit.  As for Joe Biden, I'm not a fan of his either, but you all ate up the over 30,000 lies spewed by the man you believe is above reproach so you have no high ground here.   

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.2.14  George  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.7    one month ago

Are you saying that CNN and the other liberal news agencies are too stupid or too lazy to file a freedom of information act for the footage since it has already been released?

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
2.2.15  Duck Hawk  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.8    one month ago

I must be mistaken, I could have sworn the event we are talking about happened on 01/06/2021. NOT in 2016.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.16  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.13    one month ago

They lied to us. Remember?

The Russia/collusion hoax (that was the biggest one)

Hands up don't shoot (that one cost lives)

Biden presided over the largest deficit reduction in American history. (the more recent)

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.17  Ozzwald  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.11    one month ago
It's a factual statement, The Jan 6th Committee had every chance to release it.

You made the claim that they did and they should be asked why to Tucker Carlson.

And you have already been told why they didn't .

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.18  Ozzwald  replied to  George @2.2.14    one month ago

Are you saying that CNN and the other liberal news agencies are too stupid or too lazy to file a freedom of information act for the footage since it has already been released?

Stay with the facts.  A filing with the Freedom of Information Act, would not have been responded to by McCarthy.  McCarthy did this unilaterally.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.19  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.16    one month ago

If you're talking about the media, I never said they didn't.  I said your sources are just as bad if not worse.  Maybe re-read what I actually said and not what you "think" I said.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.20  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.17    one month ago
You made the claim that they did and they should be asked

I said that as a statement. They should have released all the footage and they should explain why they didn't.


And you have already been told  why they didn't  .

No, you gave excuses that don't hod water. They don't need excuses for showing only the footage they wanted to show.  

As somebody famous said " Elections have consequences. "  

Oh ya, let me give the citation:

At least one of us has to.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.21  Sparty On  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.7    one month ago

But you trust that the Jan 6th committee was completely honest and got it all right?

I have a slightly used suspension bridge in Michigan to sell you if you believe that.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.22  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.10    one month ago

And you trust that the Jan 6th committee used all the footage honestly?

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
2.2.23  Snuffy  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.22    one month ago
trust that the Jan 6th committee used all the footage honestly?

Well of course we can.  After all that's why they hired a former ABC TV News producer James Goldston.    /s

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.24  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.22    one month ago

Did I say that?  Point out where I said that.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.25  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.23    one month ago

Again, where did I say that?  Point it out for me.  

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
2.2.26  Snuffy  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.25    one month ago

Why are you asking me.  I didn't respond to  you.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.27  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.25    one month ago

Show me where I said you did.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.28  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.26    one month ago

You responded to a comment directed to me so I responded to you too.  I am allowed to do that you know.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.29  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.27    one month ago

LOL. SMH.  

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
2.2.30  Snuffy  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.28    one month ago

Just because you can do something doesn't always mean you should.  A little context might serve you better in the future.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
2.2.31  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.29    one month ago

Don’t run away now.    You’ve made an accusation, now back it up.   Or you can maintain your chosen “run away” stance.

Your call ...

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.32  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.30    one month ago

I'll do as I please and if you don't like it, then block me.  So much for free speech with you people.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.33  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.31    one month ago

I'm not running away.  I'm going to work.  You know that place where people make money.  If you don't like me replying to your commenting on a comment that was a reply to me, then block me.  I don't fucking care what you do or don't do, but I'll do as I please without asking for permission from you.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.34  Tessylo  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.33    one month ago

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

So true WT.  If we don't agree with them WE are said to be insulting when it is their typical projection, deflection, and denial and the endless defense of a career criminal, lifelong thug, grifter.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.35  Tessylo  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.30    one month ago

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif Unbelieveable!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.36  Tessylo  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.33    one month ago

Snuffy also told me to go away.

I'm not going anywhere!

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.2.37  George  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.18    one month ago
would not have been responded to by McCarthy.

That's a lie, do you have any proof? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.38  Tessylo  replied to  George @2.2.37    one month ago

It's true.

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
2.2.39  Snuffy  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.38    one month ago

Then you should have no trouble in providing proof, should  you.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.40  Tessylo  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.26    one month ago

Don't you know how forums like this work??????????????????

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.41  Tessylo  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.39    one month ago

No need to provide proof of the truth.

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
2.2.42  Snuffy  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.41    one month ago

That's the response I expected from  you, another 'nuh uh' reply.  At least  you're consistent.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
2.2.43  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.41    one month ago
No need to provide proof of the truth

Truth can be proven by facts and evidence.  Bullshit, not so much.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.44  Ozzwald  replied to  George @2.2.37    one month ago
That's a lie, do you have any proof?

Look up the process for your fucking self if you don't believe it.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
2.2.45  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  George @2.2.37    one month ago
That's a lie, do you have any proof? 

Where Should I Send My FOIA Request?

Within the Department of Labor, each component processes its own FOIA requests. Therefore, your request will receive the quickest possible response if it is addressed directly to the disclosure officer for the component that you believe has the records you are seeking. You can find a description of Department of Labor   components   and the   disclosure officers , including their addresses, online.

If you believe the Department of Labor maintains the records you are seeking, but you are uncertain about which DOL component has the records, you may send your request to: Office of the Solicitor, Office of Information Services (OIS), Division of Management and Administrative Legal Services, 200 Constitution Ave NW, Room N-2420, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: FOIA Request. Personnel in OIS will forward your request to the appropriate agency component.

How Long Will It Take to Answer My FOIA Request?

Under the statute, federal agencies are required to respond to a FOIA request within twenty working days, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. This period does not begin until the request is actually received by the component that maintains the records sought.

Guide to Submitting Requests Under the Freedom of Information Act | U.S. Department of Labor (dol.gov)

So why would a Republican congressman be responding to FOIA requests if they are sent to the labor department of the current administration?

Of course he was almost certainly responding to a rightwing conservative FOYA request (Fuck Over Your Adversary request). No doubt he's been lobbied by the crazy dipshit Qanon wing of his party wanting anything they can use to minimize the damage from January 6th even if it's to play several thousand hours of footage of some empty back hallway because with that they can proclaim "See! It wasn't chaos everywhere as the fake news lying MSM partisan January 6th committee would have you believe! Mwahahaha Mwahahahaha!". Of course these right wing conservatives and the master they grovel before and continue to serve don't give a fuck about truth, they love lies as is proven by their undying allegiance to the king of liars, their fat greasy naked Emperor who apparently makes some humans who have lost all shame and self respect want to shove their heads up his ass and lap up his taint juice like it's some nectar of the Gods. And apparently after lapping up Trumps nectar these half wit braindead dumb shits and poorly educated religious conservatives like going on social media to dispense some of the taint onto others in an attempt to infect the narrative with their brain damaging viral propaganda.

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.2.46  George  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.44    one month ago

So you have no proof and just a lie, I know how freedom of information works.

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.2.47  George  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.2.45    one month ago

Where should you send the FOI? So you are going with the media is too stupid to figure it out! That fits CNN and the other liberal mouthpiece media perfectly.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.48  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2    one month ago
So why was it released only to Tucker?

Maybe he asked for it?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.49  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.48    one month ago

Maybe he asked for it?

And again, if he had asked for it through proper channels it would not have been through McCarthy.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.50  Ozzwald  replied to  George @2.2.46    one month ago
So you have no proof and just a lie, I know how freedom of information works.

Apparently you do not, or else you wouldn't be continuing this stupid claim after Dismayed Patriot's accurate response.

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.2.51  George  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.50    one month ago

Bullshit, his response was a deflection, keep hiding from the fact that they are too stupid to figure out where to get it, only a complete moron would ask the dept of Labor for a request to the DOJ for starters. FAIL!!!  Since it has already been released to a media source there would be no grounds to withhold it.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.52  Ozzwald  replied to  George @2.2.51    one month ago
Bullshit, his response was a deflection

So your claim is that if anyone files a FoIA request, it would be processed and release through the Speaker of the House?  Is that really what you are claiming???

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.53  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.49    one month ago
And again, if he had asked for it through proper channels it would not have been through McCarthy.

Oh well, all the bitching in the world isn't going to change it now, is it?

Get over it already!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.54  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.53    one month ago
Get over it already!

You're the one that keeps butting into other people's conversation.  Get over it!  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.55  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.54    one month ago

I just find it hard to believe that anyone could be upset over this, but then again I am not a Biden sycophant.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.56  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.55    one month ago
but then again I am not a Biden sycophant.

No you're a Trump and Putin sycophant.

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.2.57  George  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.52    one month ago

No, I clearly said the DOJ, are you now simply trolling? or proving that you can't dispute the facts so are trying to deflect?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.58  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.56    one month ago

your comment is simply untrue.

 
 
 
dennis smith
Professor Silent
2.2.59  dennis smith  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.53    one month ago

And the whining continues. Some things never change.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2.60  Ronin2  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @2.2.6    one month ago

You mean they wanted to keep their TDS partisan narrative alive.

Some of the committee’s work — such as videotape of hundreds of witness interviews — will not be made public immediately. The committee is sending those videos and some other committee records to the National Archives, which by law would make them available in 50 years. Members of the committee said they didn’t release that videotape now because it would have been too difficult to edit it and redact sensitive information.

Democrats need and deserve a good swift kick in the privates. They can't be trusted at any level with any thing. They are just pissed that someone as partisan as they are now has a hold of materials they want to keep hidden because it proves how full of shit they really are.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2.61  Ronin2  replied to  Ozzwald @2.2.7    one month ago
AND with no other news agency having that footage, Tucker is free to make up whatever he wants to say, with no fear of being called out on falsehoods.

Just like the Jan 6th committee.

We can do this all day.

Sorry if leftists are pissed that someone as impartial as Democrats are now has all of the "evidence"; and can present a highly doctored view that fits their narrative.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
2.2.62  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Ronin2 @2.2.60    one month ago

I said exactly what I meant.  Don't ever put words in my mouth.  You aren't even fucking close to qualified to speak for me. 

Again, Tucker Carlson cannot be trusted per Fox News' Attorneys.  You're just happy that YOUR partisan has the footage.  If you believe that Fox News, or any news source for that matter whether right or left, will release the entirety of the videos, then I have a bridge to sell you in New York. Fox will edit that footage to show exactly what they want to show and nothing more.  

As for your rant about Democrats, that's just partisan BS because the other side can and does say the same thing about Republicans and Conservatives and there are things that they want hidden just as much as the other side.  Again, you have no high ground here. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @2    one month ago

We are of scared shitless of the republicans/gop/gqp.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
2.3.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @2.3    one month ago
We are of scared shitless of the republicans/gop/gqp.

That is pretty obvious.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.3.2  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @2.3    one month ago

I'm scared I'll get some of them on me...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Sophomore Principal
2.3.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @2.3.2    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Sophomore Principal
2.3.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  devangelical @2.3.2    one month ago

I’m sorry that you live in fear.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.3.5  afrayedknot  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.3.4    one month ago

“I’m sorry that you live in fear.”

Are you packing?  

 
 
 
George
Freshman Guide
2.3.6  George  replied to  afrayedknot @2.3.5    one month ago

Trolling comment.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
2.3.7  afrayedknot  replied to  George @2.3.6    one month ago

I know you are…feeling more safe that we are not neighbors. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.3.8  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @2.3.7    4 weeks ago
I know you are…feeling more safe that we are not neighbors.

Safer........or just grateful?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3  Jeremy Retired in NC    one month ago
Mr. Carlson has questioned whether investigators including the House Jan. 6 committee created to probe the attack have provided an accurate portrayal of the events that day.

LMAO.  Anybody with a functioning brain knows it wasn't an accurate portrayal.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    one month ago

It played well with about 10% of the population.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    one month ago

And that 10% can't back up a single claim they've made but are the loudest.  Even here on NT.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.1    one month ago

They're even afraid to venture out before 11AM

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.2    one month ago

Vic and minions, me and others have destroyed your arguments, particularly on subjects like this one, at every turn. You live in a fantasy land. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.1    one month ago

You are NT's comic relief. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.5  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    one month ago
me and others have destroyed your arguments

Yes, you've proven that time and again / S

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    one month ago
Vic and minions, me and others have destroyed your arguments, particularly on subjects like this one

Stated like a truly fearful anti Trumper......................doesn't hold water 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.8  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.7    one month ago
Stated like a truly fearful anti Trumper.

And they have a lot to fear today!

Maybe that's why he left already?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.4    one month ago

Hey there you are!!!!   One of the 10% Vic mentioned.  So what's this weeks "smoking gun"?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.10  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    one month ago
me and others have destroyed your arguments

I know you can't do it, but provide the links to back up this claim.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.11  Ender  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    one month ago
You live in a fantasy land

Several here do....

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
3.1.12  pat wilson  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.8    one month ago
And they have a lot to fear today!

Are you making more predictions ?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.13  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.1    one month ago

And you can't answer simple questions so...

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.14  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.8    one month ago

No one is afraid of you people nor the releasing of videos to a liar like Tucker.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.15  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.14    one month ago

No shit?

That's why you are calling him a liar. Hoping the stupid might listen to you.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.16  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.13    one month ago

Vic never ask me a question in 3.1.  So what do you have your hair on fire for?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.17  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.15    one month ago

I didn't call him a liar.  Fox News attorneys called him a liar.  Again, maybe read what I actually said not what you "think" I said.  And the only "stupid" are people who believe a someone whose news agency actually argued in court that he is a liar.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.18  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.16    one month ago

You have been consistently asked questions in the past and asked to back up your comments by numerous people that you refuse to answer.  All you do is deflect and run around in circles rather than answer simple questions posed to you.  No one should ever answer a damn question you ask.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.19  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.17    one month ago
I didn't call him a liar.

Let me check. Oh ya, you did, right there in post 3.1.14


 And the only "stupid" are people

The stupid people tune into Rachel Maddow and vote for proxys who hide in a basement and don't even campaign.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.20  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    one month ago

And about 70% of NTers.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.21  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.19    one month ago

Well, if Fox News' attorneys called him a liar in Court, that would make him a liar on the record, and I said he was a liar because Fox News' attorneys called him a liar so he is in fact a liar.  

As for Rachel Maddow, I don't watch her or any cable news. I read my news from various sources unlike most conservatives who have to watch their so called "news" because apparently they don't understand what they read (i.e., you putting words in my mouth).  

As for Biden, I already said I don't like him either so again maybe read what I actually said and not what you think I said because you are not qualified to speak for me or anyone for that matter.  

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.22  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.19    one month ago

As of Maddow, are you going to tell me you wouldn't have a problem if all the footage was released to just her?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.23  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.20    one month ago

It changed a lot since 2017.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.24  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.21    one month ago
As for Biden, I already said I don't like him either

What don't you like about him?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.25  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @3.1.22    one month ago
As of Maddow, are you going to tell me you wouldn't have a problem if all the footage was released to just her?

The Jan 6th Committee had all the footage. What would be the difference?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.26  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.24    one month ago

There are plenty of reasons not to like Biden, just like there are plenty of reasons not to like Trump.  It's not an either or situation like you want to to be. If I list them all, I'll be here all day, but first and foremost, he's a lifetime politician who had his chance to make changes in this county.   

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.27  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.3    one month ago

JR and like minded worker drones.    All you manage to regularly do here is shown your extreme biases.    Especially when it comes to anything Trump.    

You hate the term TDS because it is so spot on and cuts to the quick. Your opinions on this border on insanity and completely lack any reason.    

Pretty sad really.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.28  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.25    one month ago

So now you are going to state that you wouldn't care? Uh huh, sure...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.29  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.26    one month ago
he's a lifetime politician who had his chance to make changes in this county.   

You don't think that Joe Biden has made changes in this country?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.30  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.27    one month ago

So in your mind, trump had nothing to do with any of this?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.31  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.29    one month ago

Current changes, no not really.  Over the decades he's been a politician, yes he's made changes, most of which are outdated for today's society.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.32  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.18    one month ago

Oh, so you are freaking out over something completely unrelated just for the sake of freaking out.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.33  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.31    one month ago
Current changes, no not really. 

Start with America's energy sector or the US border.


Over the decades he's been a politician, yes he's made changes, most of which are outdated for today's society.  

He was a moderate until 2020. His only contribution up until then was serving credt card companies.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.34  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.21    one month ago
I said he was a liar because Fox News' attorneys called him a liar so he is in fact a liar.  

So you have no original thought.  Just parroting something you've been told.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.35  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.32    one month ago

First, I'm not freaking out.  I'm giving a warning to anyone who tries to interact with you that you will not answer any questions posed to you even if they are simple yes or no questions and that you will not back up your comments when you demand others backup their comments.  The fact that you think I'm "freaking out" just shows how hysterical you get when you get called out on your shit.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.36  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.33    one month ago

Again, no big changes.  We were never energy independent because we don't own the "energy".  The oil and gas companies control how energy independent we are as they own the "energy".  The border has been blowing up for decades and every time a Dem is elected, you people freak out about it.  Trump could have had all of the money he wanted for the border wall as there was a bipartisan legislation that would have granted him the money and it was a plan that he originally said he would sign, but in the end, he wouldn't sign it.  That's on him.

Biden is still a moderate.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.37  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.34    one month ago

Courts deal with facts, and the fact is that Fox News won it's court case by saying that Tucker Carlson is a liar.  Facts are facts there skippy.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.38  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @3.1.30    one month ago

Any thing to do with what?    Please be specific.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.39  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.38    one month ago

The seed is about 6 Jan. and you say TDS. How in the world could any talk about the day not include him and his big lie.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.40  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.37    one month ago
Courts deal with facts,

So lets see the actual transcript of this.  Until then, I'll just write you off as parroting.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.41  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @3.1.39    one month ago

This seed is about Tucker Carlson obtaining Jan 6th video.    My TDS comment spoke directly to another posters response to that.    

You know I’ll answer your question if you asked one specifically so ask away if you really want an answer.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.42  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.41    one month ago

One of those mornings here...

 
 
 
Have Opinion Will Travel
Professor Participates
3.1.43  Have Opinion Will Travel  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.37    one month ago

That's not true actually.  That's just your interpretation.  Which is basically the same thing you are accusing Carlson of doing.  In any event the left wingers I have observed are far more adept at twisting the truth than their opposition.  Far more abundant as well, which accounts for a significant component of those feeding the minions of the Idiocracy.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.44  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @3.1.42    one month ago

Well, may it get better then.     My offer stands.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.45  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.40    one month ago

Again, I'm not providing proof to someone who doesn't provide proof of his own comments either and can't even answer a yes or no question.  I provided a link below that you can look at.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.46  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.44    one month ago

I know you will be direct with me. We may see things differently yet I always thought we could talk.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.47  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @3.1.43    one month ago

Wrong.  The fact is that Fox News won their court case by saying that no reasonable viewer would believe Tucker Carlson so no it's not my "interpretation".  There are a lot of unreasonable viewers here apparently.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.48  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.45    one month ago

That's a longwinded way to say you can't the actual transcript and you're just a parrot.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.49  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.48    one month ago

LOL!  Says the guy to can't and won't prove anything he says, and can't even answer a yes or no question.  Typical conservative bullshit.  

 
 
 
Have Opinion Will Travel
Professor Participates
3.1.50  Have Opinion Will Travel  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.47    one month ago

You just admitted what I said was correct.  Calling it a "lie" is your interpretation. Which why I previously stated that left wingers are very adept at twisting the truth.  Thus, the reference to feeding the minions of the Idiocracy.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.51  Tessylo  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @3.1.50    one month ago

No she didn't.

You sound very familiar with your projection, deflection and denial.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.52  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.49    one month ago

Still don't see that link to the transcript.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.53  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @3.1.50    one month ago

I never admitted any such thing.  Your reading comprehension sucks just like your listening comprehension if you believe a thing Tucker says (like I said unreasonable viewer).  Right wingers are the ones always twisting the truth just like you are doing right now.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.54  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.52    one month ago

And you won't since you don't even know how to answer simple questions.  You never answered any of my questions on other articles so I'm choosing not to play your fucking games.  Go back and answer questions posed to you and I'll get you all of the information you want.  Until then, fuck off.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.55  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.54    one month ago
You never answered any of my questions on other articles

Again, you bringing up unrelated bullshit because, why?  

Go back and answer questions posed to you and I'll get you all of the information you want.

Go back there and wait.  If I don't show up, wait some more.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.56  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.55    one month ago

Again, you will not demand of me things you refuse to provide when you are asked to so you can hold your breath until I post the transcript.  I hope you can hold your breath for a long time.  You'll get nothing from me.  Again, fuck off.  

 
 
 
Have Opinion Will Travel
Professor Participates
3.1.57  Have Opinion Will Travel  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.14    one month ago

But you’re OK with every other freakin lie that suits your narrative.

This one in particular

What we see now are political, prisoners resulting from a 3-hour Jan 6 event who were let in by Capitol Police opening door & ordered to stand down. Trump’s extra security offer was denied by Pelosi. 2 unarmed women murdered by Capitol police. And that’s just a mere surface description of some things far more sinister.

 Meanwhile as a backdrop the Democrats let go 1,400 violent rioters in 2020 (most destructive riots in U.S. history) killing 20+ people. The type of event that you could actually label an insurrection where left wing fukwads completely lied about what took place.  

Most definitely the emperor has no clothes. And the reality remains the clear and the obvious truth is that left wingers must decry Tucker Carlson’s interpretation of events as false because we know and we see examples of it every day, that they’re not really afraid of the exaggerations, hyperbole and harsh one sided interpretations, but rather the real hard cold truth, that is what they’re really afraid of.

And I’ll add one other thing, there’s nothing you can possibly gain by perpetuating those lies, except to form greater resistance and aggravation and escalation, that more than likely will result in a bloody Civil War. So if that’s what you’re seeking, and it’s hard not to believe that from the facts, more than likely you’ll get it.  

My take ultimately is January 6 was a release of pent-up emotions, stemming from left-wing ideologues acting in a fascist manner to force their hideous ideology down the throats of otherwise decent citizens.  A wise person would take it as a forewarning that it would be a better strategy to reckon with reality, than to perpetuate a false narrative.

But the only thing they have convinced me of is, they have no intention of doing so, and that is another sad fact.  That the desperately over the top persecution of their enemies is being pursued to demonstrate the power of the state they’re willing to wield in order to suppress their opposition.  Seriously doubt they would be doing it unless they felt an actual event of of that nature could occur as a result of their authoritarian azzdouchery.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.58  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @3.1.57    one month ago

Omg. That comment is hilarious and full of bullshit that's been repeatedly fact checked and debunked. And, like you all said when Trump was elected...FUCK YOUR FEELINGS. The fact that you all let your emotions lead you people to storm the Capitol says you all can't control your fucking emotions enough to not break the law.  That unarmed idiot sealed her own fate and what happened to her was 100% her own fault. Meanwhile over 14,000 people were arrested in the riots and a majority of them were prosecuted under State laws not Federal. Learn the fucking difference.  The fact that Fox won a lawsuit by claiming that no reasonable viewer would take Tucker Carlson seriously proves no one should take him seriously as Fox News itself would have to prove that no one should take him seriously and it did since they won the fucking lawsuit.  Now, no one should take anything you say seriously after your bs rant full of debunked bullshit.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.59  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @3.1.57    one month ago

And the only fascists are the the people who attempted to subvert the results of a legitimate election to install their loser candidate while yelling hang Mike Pence.  You people turn on your own in a heartbeat when they won't toe your party line. Talk about sheep. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.60  JohnRussell  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.58    one month ago

Ashley Babbit was shot and killed violently entering a broken window panel in a barricaded and locked door that was literally a few steps from the US House of Representatives floor. 

The idea that she was "murdered" is absurd. The man that shot her was sworn to protect that House chamber and its inhabitants.  What was he supposed to do let her and then others inside to endanger the US Representatives? 

Defense of her actions is insanity.  But that is where are at now in this country. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.61  Texan1211  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.59    one month ago
And the only fascists are the the people who attempted to subvert the results of a legitimate election to install their loser candidate while yelling hang Mike Pence.  You people turn on your own in a heartbeat when they won't toe your party line. Talk about sheep. 

fascists---AGAIN?

When will this foolishness stop?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.62  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.60    one month ago
Defense of her actions is insanity.

Using this logic, EVERY protestor that illegally breaks into ANY building, can be legally whacked and stacked.

Right John?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.63  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.59    one month ago

I love that Texan keeps replying to me when HE KNOWS HE'S ON IGNORE.  HAHAHAHAH. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.64  Tessylo  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.58    one month ago

That's all they have is bullshit on top of their PD&D.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.65  Tessylo  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.58    one month ago

Also see who votes up all the debunked bullshit, lies, and PD&D.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.66  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.63    one month ago

Nah but what’s really hilarious is that you would think that is funny.

Rib splitting funny!

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.67  afrayedknot  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.62    one month ago

“EVERY protestor that illegally breaks into ANY building, can be legally whacked and stacked.”

For one, the Capitol is not just ‘any’ building. Secondly, she was attempting to disrupt and thus dismiss the normal functions of our government. Lastly, and sadly, she was egged on, implicitly and deliberately by those who would personally ‘gain’ should her actions come to fruition. 

Never excusing of course, the breaking into buildings, the violence that erupts when protesting, or the property damage that occurs. That, however, is a local issue…totally separate and not to be compared or correlated. Logical? 

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.68  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.66    one month ago

It is rib splitting funny because he's just wasting his time commenting to someone he knows has him on ignore (and he's the only person I have on ignore).  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.69  Texan1211  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.66    one month ago
Nah but what’s really hilarious is that you would think that is funny. Rib splitting funny!

No accounting for what some pass off as 'humor'.

But I wonder why all the grand announcements about having someone on ignore?  Is it just a lousy attempt at relevancy?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.70  afrayedknot  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.69    one month ago

“Is it just a lousy attempt at relevancy?”

Too, too funny, tex. Gnaturally…

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.71  Texan1211  replied to  afrayedknot @3.1.70    one month ago
Too, too funny,

So, much like your posts attempt to be.

Thanks!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.72  Texan1211  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.68    one month ago
It is rib splitting funny because he's just wasting his time commenting to someone he knows has him on ignore (and he's the only person I have on ignore).  

I hope one day you get that putting someone on ignore ONLY has an effect on YOU, not on the person you claim to ignore.

BTW, why so many posts about the person you claim to ignore?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.73  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.69    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.74  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.73    one month ago

It's just weird to me.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.75  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.73    one month ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
magicschoolbusdropout
Sophomore Principal
3.1.76  magicschoolbusdropout  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.69    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.77  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.74    one month ago

[Deleted

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.78  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  magicschoolbusdropout @3.1.76    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.79  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.77    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
dennis smith
Professor Silent
3.1.80  dennis smith  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.55    one month ago

The usual Fuck off comment means I have nothing of importance to say"

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.81  JBB  replied to  dennis smith @3.1.80    one month ago

Enlighten us! What is important you have to contribute?

 
 
 
dennis smith
Professor Silent
3.1.82  dennis smith  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.69    one month ago

Certainly, it is a lousy attempt at relevancy.

 
 
 
dennis smith
Professor Silent
3.1.83  dennis smith  replied to  JBB @3.1.81    one month ago

Flew right over your head.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.84  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  dennis smith @3.1.80    one month ago
The usual Fuck off comment means I have nothing of importance to say"

The "Fuck Off" is more an indication that somebody can't dispute what you say and they want you to leave them alone (you're making them cry).  Usually a tell that a liberal has lost an argument.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.85  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.84    one month ago

Exactly!

Now they are out searching for something to dispute the facts with.

We'll wait!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.86  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.85    one month ago
Now they are out searching for something to dispute the facts with.

My money is that, just as in the past, it's fiction.  

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.87  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.84    one month ago

No one is crying over you or any conservatives no matter how much you'd like to believe people are. [Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.88  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.87    one month ago

and yet here you are.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.89  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.88    one month ago

Yes, I am here, and I'll be here or anywhere else that I want to without asking permission from you or anyone else on these boards, [Deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.90  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.88    one month ago

Inexplicable, no?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.91  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.86    one month ago

Usually they are left to repeat some statement by Biden or one of his incompetent appointees

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.92  Sparty On  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.69    one month ago

I think NT needs a John Cena, “you can’t see me” meme

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.93  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.68    one month ago

Yeah well I think it’s funny that you make a point of highlighting it after you’ve “ignored” him.    Thus failing to truly accomplish ignoring him.

Very funny but that’s just my opinion.   I could be wrong.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.94  Sparty On  replied to  afrayedknot @3.1.67    one month ago

Well, any place of business or home is not just “any building” to the people that own it.    I tire of the expectation some seem to have that our politicians somehow deserve greater protections than the people who they are supposedly serving.

That mentality is simply just FUBAR IMO.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.95  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.89    one month ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.96  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.91    one month ago

And act the victim when all their "facts" are revealed to be fiction.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.97  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.93    one month ago

When I go through the comments, I can see is grayed out area that shows he replied to me, but I cannot see the comment at all; hence having him on ignore, so yes, you're opinion is wrong.  I'm just pointing out I think it's hilarious that he's wasting his time as he knows I have him on ignore and won't read his comments, and you all went bat crap crazy.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.98  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.96    one month ago

There isn't enough Turtle Wax in the world to polish that turd!

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.99  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.97    one month ago

Opinions do vary ....

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.100  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.99    one month ago

Opinions are not facts...

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.101  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.100    one month ago

True, so practice what you preach.

If I had a nickel for every time some here called their opinion, fact.    I would be a rich, rich man.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.102  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @3.1.98    one month ago

Notice you didn't even attempt to prove me wrong.  Can't say I'm surprised.  It's expected.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.103  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.102    one month ago

Get back with us when you prove what we saw live on our televisions on January 6th 2020 was a Democratic "fiction"!

You have presented absolutely nothing to be proven wrong.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.104  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @3.1.103    one month ago
You have presented absolutely nothing to be proven wrong.

You man like stating that you all act the victim when your "facts" are revealed to be fiction?  I'm honestly surprised I didn't see one of your 2nd grade level meme's.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.105  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.101    one month ago

I am supplying facts as I'm the one who has him on ignore so what I see is what I see and your ASSumptions on the situation are your incorrect opinions so it's YOU who needs to practice what you preach. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.106  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.105    one month ago

Okay, I’ll give you one example of that which I speak and will leave to you own devices as I’ll sure it won’t take.

You say he is wasting his time.     Do you know that for fact or is that your opinion?    How could you know for a fact that he thinks he is wasting his time.    You couldn’t, therefore that is only your opinion.   Not fact.

One nickel please .....

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.107  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.106    one month ago

It's a fact he's wasting his time commenting to me since I will never see nor read his comments.  I'll keep my nickel. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.108  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.104    one month ago

You have never disproven me, or ever really even tried to...

"Nunt Uh", and, "Liar", are not rebuttals. But, all you've got!

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.109  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.107    4 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.110  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.109    4 weeks ago

Nice attempt at an insult.  He's wasting his time replying to me.  End of story.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.111  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.110    4 weeks ago

Nice attempt at an insult.

Lol, if I insult you,  you’ll know it.    That’s wasn’t an insult.   It was an observation.

He's wasting his time replying to me.  End of story.

Nah but YOU have power to really end the story by stopping the passive aggressive nonsense and just stop responding.    No one cares that you say you don’t care.

And by the way that isn’t an insult either.   Just another observation.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.112  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.111    4 weeks ago

Like I said ATTEMPT at an insult.  

I'll deal with Texan anyway I wish to, and I'll talk to anyone here that I wish to talk to in any manner I want to and there's nothing you can fucking do about it.  As to your observations, they are just your OPINION on any given situation and are meaningless.  

And, finally, I stand by my comment that he's wasting his time typing out any comments to me AS I WILL NEVER SEE THEM NOR READ THEM, and if I wish to remind him that he's on ignore, that's what I'll do with or without your input. 

Apparently, you care since you keep replying about it to me.     

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.113  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.111    4 weeks ago

And, by the way, you could never insult me.  For you to insult me, I would have to respect you first.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.114  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.60    4 weeks ago
Ashley Babbit was shot and killed violently entering a broken window panel

"Violently"?

Look up the damn definition before you spout BS. How does one "violently" climb through a narrow broken window panel? Was she armed in any way? No, period. 

in a barricaded and locked door that was literally a few steps from the US House of Representatives floor. 

You mean the House of Representatives floor that had already been cleared? That House of Representatives floor? What the fuck was he protecting? If any representative was in danger there would have been a hell of a lot more security than Barney Fife behind the door.

Watch the video. The three security guards standing in front of the door are ordered to leave. Two reasons. First is that all of the Congress critters were gone. Second a fully armed SWAT team was coming down the hall. Barney Fife with a gun was the only security with weapon drawn. None of the security behind him; or in front of the doors had their weapons drawn. The SWAT team down the hall had to duck when the shot went off; they weren't informed. It is a shame that the SWAT member with the nice assault rifle didn't show the same courtesy to Barney Fife that was shown to Babbitt. Instead of pointing his weapon at Barney, giving the thumbs up, and then telling Barney to lower his weapon twice; instead just saw an armed moron and fired.  

The Barney Fife that you are so eagerly defending never should have been on Capitol Security in the first place. 

.

Michael Byrd, the U.S. Capitol Police lieutenant who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, is the same officer who left his gun unattended in a Capitol bathroom in 2019. 

Capitol Police found Byrd’s Glock 22 in a Capitol Visitor Center complex bathroom in February 2019 “during a routine security sweep.” At the time, Byrd was the Capitol Police commander of the House Chambers and was scheduled for work the next two days after the incident. The police department launched an investigation into Byrd’s negligence, but he was eventually allowed to stay on the force.

In an exclusive interview with Byrd, NBC’s Lester Holt asked the officer about the investigation and how it’s “been brought up by those who were questioning your competency.”

“Do you want to respond to that?” Holt asked.

“It was a terrible mistake. I acknowledged it. I owned up to it, accepted the responsibility. I was penalized for it and I moved on,” Byrd said before Holt cut to another topic.

Should have been terminated for it is more like it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.115  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.114    4 weeks ago

right wing extremists are responsible for a lot of death and destruction.  Look it up ronin, it will probably, as you said before, 'break google' with all the responses you'll get that support my claim.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.116  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.112    4 weeks ago

I’m not the one making a point about someone I allegedly ignored.

I get that you don’t get it and are not prone to listening logic though so no biggie.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.117  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.113    4 weeks ago

Lol .... wowwie. ...... boy, you really “attempted” an insult there.

I think you hurt my last feeling ....

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.118  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.115    4 weeks ago

Tell it to Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.    Most others in history are killing rookies compared to left wing crackpots like that

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.119  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.117    4 weeks ago

No attempt at an insult, just an "observation".  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Sophomore Principal
3.1.120  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.115    4 weeks ago
right wing extremists are responsible for a lot of death and destruction.  

Damn FBI crime stats aren't organized that way.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.121  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.117    4 weeks ago
I think you hurt my last feeling

Damnit. I was saving that for me. I never get to have any fun....

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.122  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.116    4 weeks ago

No, you're here defending one of your compatriots that I refuse to speak with, and you haven't provided any points nor logic, so no biggie.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.123  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.119    4 weeks ago

Ah yes, the old Peewee Herman “I know you are but what am I” gambit.

Well played sir, well played....

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.124  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @3.1.121    4 weeks ago

I’ll cut it.    You can have halfsies 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.125  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.122    4 weeks ago
No, you're here defending one of your compatriots that I refuse to speak with, and you haven't provided any points nor logic, so no biggie.  

I wasn’t defending anyone.    I was calling out emotional nonsense.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.126  Texan1211  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.110    4 weeks ago
He's wasting his time replying to me

You don't have to read my comments for me to disprove yours.

Others are here reading the comments, too!

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.127  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.123    4 weeks ago

Well, conservatives are the kings of projection. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.128  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.124    4 weeks ago

If I save my half and use it on groundhog day, can I use it again? Or is that considered bad form.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.129  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.125    4 weeks ago

No, you are defending your compatriot who I refuse to talk to.  You'd love to think that I'm emotional about this, when in fact, I'm laughing at him for wasting his time and you for coming to his defense.  You all are so entertaining.   

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.130  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.129    4 weeks ago

Wrong again 

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.131  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.130    4 weeks ago

Yes, you are wrong again.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.132  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @3.1.128    4 weeks ago

No problem but I’m not worried.   No way you make it year.    

No way.

jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.133  Texan1211  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.125    4 weeks ago
I was calling out emotional nonsense.

To no avail.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.134  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.131    4 weeks ago

A. Double Peewee ..... Paul, is that you.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.135  Sparty On  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.133    4 weeks ago

Ohh the temerity .... to call out some folks here ... the sheer audacity ...

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.136  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.134    4 weeks ago

It's my "observation" that you are wrong and have been wrong, so you will continue to be wrong in your next comment to me.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.137  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.135    4 weeks ago

You guys routinely "call people out" on no other basis than your own say so. 

Big deal. Post information instead of pointless "call outs" then we may have something to talk about.  Til then it is meaningless. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
3.1.138  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.137    4 weeks ago

256

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.139  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.137    4 weeks ago

And “you guys” routinely make fools out of yourselves by either not reading the posts in question or being intentionally obtuse about them.

This is one of those cases.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.1.140  Sparty On  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @3.1.136    4 weeks ago

Okay then, you are right.    But since according to you I continue to be wrong, you are in reality, wrong again ..... too bad

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.141  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.140    4 weeks ago

Typical. 

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
3.1.142  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Sparty On @3.1.140    4 weeks ago

256

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.2  cjcold  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3    one month ago
an accurate portrayal

Anybody who was watching TV on 1/6 or since knows it was accurate.

It's all on video for christs sake! Many different videos played over and over!

The web is overflowing with videos of 1/6 taken by the rioters themselves.

Many of those insurgents are now serving time for their own idiotic selfies.

1/6 was likely the most filmed treasonous event in history

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Participates
3.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  cjcold @3.2    one month ago
Anybody who was watching TV on 1/6 or since knows it was accurate.

Don't believe those lying eyes! 

Everything we saw live that day was all a deep fake from the deep state and any actual violence was carried out by ANTIFA and BLM and they altered the audio of the peaceful conservative protesters who were chanting "Thanks Mike Pence!" to "Hang Mike Pence!" and the 40,000+ hours of footage Tucker has hidden in his voluminous rectum will soon prove all rightwing conservatives right! /s

There really isn't any reasoning with these clearly delusional rightwing conservatives.

 
 
 
dennis smith
Professor Silent
3.2.2  dennis smith  replied to  cjcold @3.2    one month ago

The 1/6 committee was the most treasonous event in history. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @3.2    4 weeks ago

Those morons provided all the evidence needed in their cases to prosecute them.  Fucking morons.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
4  Right Down the Center    one month ago

"House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) said the Democrat-run    Jan. 6 select committee  , which issued its final report last year, had reviewed the security footage with “numerous protocols in place to protect the safety” of lawmakers, police officers and staff."

I call bullshit on this claim.  So tell us Hakeem, exactly what protocols were put in place other than to make sure the footage you and your clown show didn't want the American public to see because it did not fit your narrative?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    one month ago

Going by all the comments but one on this seed, it is already clear that this is a runaway winner of the most hilarious seed of the week. 

Tucker Carlson is a disgraced far right "news" fabricator who was instrumental in spreading the big lie about the 2020 election, a lie he later claimed to have never believed. 

Assuming he will be fair or honest about the footage from Jan 6 is totally absurd.

I really hope the right keeps going with all this insanity, they are assuring future Democratic victories. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5    one month ago
it is already clear that this is a runaway winner of the most hilarious seed of the week. 

No, I think your distant friends here hold the Masters in that.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
5.2  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  JohnRussell @5    one month ago

Tucker cannot be trusted.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @5.2    one month ago

Why are we paying taxes for NPR?

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
5.2.2  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.1    one month ago

Nice deflection.  Why did Fox argue that Tucker Carlson cannot be trusted is the question?  Maybe because Tucker cannot be trusted.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @5.2.2    one month ago

You see, wishful, adults get to decide on that as well as the footage.

I'll repeat the Washington Post's slogan: "Democracy dies in darkness."

Put it all out there and let us decide.

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
5.2.4  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.3    one month ago

Your reply still doesn't address to my comments.  But that's expected.  

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5.2.5  Ender  replied to  Wishful_thinkin @5.2.4    one month ago

They sent the footage to a partisan that admits his is only entertainment.

Yeah, they won't edit and put together their own narrative...

Hell we see right here they blame anyone and everyone else for what happened except themselves.

They blame Pelosi, the capitol police, the FBI, etc. Blame everyone except the people that gave the false narrative to begin with. They give him the footage.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.6  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @5.2.5    one month ago
they won't edit

I don't want editing.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
5.2.7  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.3    one month ago

“Put it all out there and let us decide.”

Apparently you did not watch the events unfolding live on January 6. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5.2.8  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.6    one month ago

Then he should have released the footage to everyone instead of a partisan liar on an entertainment show.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.9  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  afrayedknot @5.2.7    one month ago
Apparently you did not watch the events unfolding live on January 6. 

I did hear the speach. I missed the radical groups who showed up.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.10  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @5.2.8    one month ago
Then he should have released the footage to everyone

As I said the partisan Jan 6th Committee had a chance to do just that, but they held back for some reason.

Tough shit for them.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
5.2.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ender @5.2.5    one month ago

They won’t edit and put together their own narrative ..

what do you imagine the j6 committee did? They literally hired television producers to package their presentation in the most dramatic way possible.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5.2.12  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.10    one month ago

So what exactly do you think they will find?

What do you think will be any outcome for this?

Partisan editing so you all can say that what happened was some kind of hoax?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5.2.13  Ender  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.11    one month ago

So do people running for congress....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.14  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @5.2.12    one month ago
So what exactly do you think they will find?

I don't know. Do you?


What do you think will be any outcome for this?

Maybe a better understanding of what happened and how it happened.


Partisan editing so you all can say that what happened was some kind of hoax?

You want the censorship, right?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5.2.15  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.14    one month ago

What better understanding do you need?

Sounds like you are just looking for a way to cast blame in other directions.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
5.2.27  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Ender @5.2.15    one month ago

Part of this thread was removed for a slap fight. Knock it off. Only warning.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.28  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.9    one month ago
I missed the radical groups who showed up

Oh, so the people who tried to bash in the barricaded door of the House of Representatives and violently enter the House chamber werent radicals, they were run of the mill Republicans. Good to know. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Sophomore Quiet
5.2.29  afrayedknot  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.9    one month ago

“I did hear the speach. I missed the radical groups who showed up.”

May have to call bullshit on this one, vic.

Of all folks, you seem to be totally invested, totally consumed by the events of that tragic day and for whatever sad reason, trying to explain it away. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.30  JohnRussell  replied to  afrayedknot @5.2.29    one month ago
 I missed the radical groups who showed up.”

I think he means there were none, or few. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2.31  Ronin2  replied to  Ender @5.2.12    one month ago
So what exactly do you think they will find?

A counter narrative to the highly partisan Jan 6th committee narrative. Showing everything the Jan 6th committee wants hidden.

What do you think will be any outcome for this?

Hopefully in 2024 the Democrats will get shit canned by the voters after being dragged through the mud for two years. That they are shown to be the real threats to Democracy.

Partisan editing so you all can say that what happened was some kind of hoax?

What was the Jan 6th committee again. As repeatedly stated they hired a television producer to edit their already highly partisan presentation and present in dramatic fashion; all at the cost of US tax payers. At least McCarthy is being smart about it and having Fox News pay for their version of events; at no damn cost to US tax payers! As for a hoax- the Jan 6th committee was a complete hoax. Now you are going to see the other sides hoax. The truth lies somewhere in the middle.

Leftists are just pissed that their version of the truth is no longer going to be the only one out there. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5.2.32  Ender  replied to  Ronin2 @5.2.31    one month ago

Thanks for admitting the congressional hearings are partisan hit jobs designed to hurt people's election aspects.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.2.33  cjcold  replied to  Vic Eldred @5.2.1    one month ago
Why are we paying taxes for NPR?

Because NPR is one of the few news outlets that actually tells the truth.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.2.34  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  cjcold @5.2.33    one month ago

Starting with their calling illegal migrants "immigrants"

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2.35  Ronin2  replied to  Ender @5.2.5    4 weeks ago
They sent the footage to a partisan that admits his is only entertainment. Yeah, they won't edit and put together their own narrative...

As compared to the Pelosi hand picked TDS partisan Jan 6th committee- that hired a tv producer. Whose only narrative was to "get Trump at all costs".

Hell we see right here they blame anyone and everyone else for what happened except themselves.

The Brandon administration, Pelosi, Schumer doctrine is what you are talking about.

They blame Pelosi, the capitol police, the FBI, etc. Blame everyone except the people that gave the false narrative to begin with. They give him the footage.

Pelosi should be blamed for the ill planned and lack of security. Funny how she didn't want the Jan 6th committee to question herself, Schumer, or Bowser. 

Similarly, then-House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving—who served on the Capitol Police
Board by virtue of his position—succumbed to political pressures from the Office of
Speaker Pelosi and House Democrat leadership leading up to January 6, 2021. He
coordinated closely with the Speaker and her staff and left Republicans out of
important discussions related to security. As a critical member of the Capitol Police
Board, the House Sergeant at Arms had an obligation to all Members, staff, and USCP
officers to keep them safe by consulting stakeholders without partisan preference.
But rather than coordinate in a meaningful way, Irving only provided information to
Republicans after receiving instruction from the Speaker’s office. In one case, Irving
even asked a senior Democratic staffer to “act surprised” when he sent key
information about plans for the Joint Session on January 6, 2021 to him and his
Republican counterpart. The senior Democratic staffer replied: “I’m startled!”

Read Page 25 thru 29 of the same report for Pelosi's involvement and change of protocol for security.

But adequate security would never have prevented Jan 6th from occurring. The Capitol Building wasn't an easy target. Never on Pelosi's, Schumer's, and Bowser's watch!/S

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2.36  Ronin2  replied to  Ender @5.2.32    4 weeks ago

No problem.

I don't expect the same from you on any of the Democrat investigations.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
5.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @5    one month ago

He will be as fair as the Jan 6th committee was. 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Guide
5.3.1  pat wilson  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.3    one month ago

Then no one should have any worries.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Sophomore Guide
5.3.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  pat wilson @5.3.1    one month ago

Of course that is up to the individual. I can assure you I won't be worried. I will pay as much attention to tucker as I did to the let's get trump......I mean Jan 6th commission 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.4  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @5    one month ago

[removed]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @5.4    one month ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
5.4.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @5.4.1    one month ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @5    one month ago

You call it hillarious. I call the liberal left's reaction pathetic!

 
 
 
Have Opinion Will Travel
Professor Participates
6  Have Opinion Will Travel    one month ago

We'll just have to wait and see what comes out of the review of the security video.  That the Dems are upset about it tells me mostly what I would expect to find. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1  Sparty On  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @6    one month ago

I predict we will find out several things.

1.) Most of the protestors were not violent.

2.) Those that were violent were be egged on by a small number of people.

3.) Some of the people doing the egging on may have suspicious bona fides that could be cleared up

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    one month ago

I think Tucker has already showed a fondness for # 3

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.1    one month ago

I’m sure he has.    One things for sure.    If there was anything like that the Jan 6th sure as shit wasn’t going to bring it out.

Honestly, all I care about it getting down to the bottom of what really happened.    I have zero faith that the Jan 6th did that with any amount of accuracy.    

Zero faith.

 
 
 
Have Opinion Will Travel
Professor Participates
6.1.3  Have Opinion Will Travel  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    one month ago

I did see a small bit of the footage when questions circled around Ray Epps encouraging people to advance the protest.

Ray Epps uncharged in Capitol riot, but feds arrested woman engaged in similar conduct | Washington Examiner

It was suspicious relative to others who were arrested but nothing came of it.  Still it makes you wonder a bit.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    one month ago

The Capitol was not open to visitors that day.  And when you have to break windows in a building to get inside, you are in the wrong. 

Its mind blowing that you'all try and minimize this atrocity against our government. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @6.1.2    one month ago
Honestly, all I care about it getting down to the bottom of what really happened.

There are numerous documentaries that show what really happened.  The New York Times has one that went into deep detail. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.4    one month ago

I’m not trying to minimize anything.    On the other hand I’m not trying to maximize it because of TDS either.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.5    one month ago

I trust the Times coverage about as much as you trust Tucker Carlson.

That said, if there is nothing to see here, why are you so upset the footage was released to Carlson?

Something to hide John?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
6.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @6.1.3    one month ago

Perfect example of the hypocrisy of the "investigation".  But, you know, we aren't allowed to point that out.  It makes some people cry.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.1.9  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Sparty On @6.1.7    one month ago

NYT, the same people that published the 1619 Project? Going to have to find something a wee bit more credible than that. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.10  Sparty On  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @6.1.9    one month ago

Many need to led by such sources because they can’t think for themselves.    They are comforted by being a worker drone.    Like the next lemming in line to jump off the cliff .... it’s all goooooooooo ....... doh!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.4    4 weeks ago

Indeed, the endless defense of the indefensible is indefensible.

 
 
 
Snuffy
PhD Guide
7  Snuffy    one month ago

I don't know if I would have given it to Tucker Carlson but I do agree that all the evidence needs to come out to the public.  Perhaps had it been given to Carlson as well as others...

About all we can really guess at now is that the 40,000  hours of video will be distilled down to cast a narrative (you know, like the Jan 6th committee presented to the public).  I would still like to have investigated and explained in public why some aspects of Capital security were deemed off-limits to the Jan 6th commitee.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
8  Jeremy Retired in NC    one month ago

With all the freak out by the left on this, I can only imagine how much damage these video's will do to their narrative of what happend that day.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @8    one month ago
I can only imagine how much damage these video's will do to their narrative of what happend that day.

About as much damage as you do to our narratives, which is to say none. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
8.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @8.1    one month ago

It appears the left is in all out panic over this, yourself included.  If it didn't threaten your narrative, you all wouldn't be in CYA mode trying to deflect and distract to nonsense garbage.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9  seeder  Vic Eldred    one month ago

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
10  seeder  Vic Eldred    one month ago
"I've confirmed with the Capitol Police that House Dems can access the footage. This GOP propaganda stunt can't go unanswered:

U2m4GIJb?format=jpg&name=small

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/23/mccarthy-jan-6-footage-tucker-carlson-propaganda/?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=wp_opinions&utm_medium=social
 
 

Who is online




30 visitors