╌>

Defend This

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  dig  •  last year  •  146 comments

Defend This

Hey Deleted for TOS [ph], defend this...

"Portland is burning to the ground!"

"All you have to do is look at the television, turn on your television, read your newspapers, it's burning to the ground!"

"The governor, the mayor, the politicians are petrified for their lives."

"That judge ought to be ashamed of himself."

(The judge is a she, and Trump appointed her)


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1  author  Dig    last year

This is insanity in plain sight.

Imagine if any other president had said anything even remotely as insane as that.

And still you fucktards support him.

WTF is wrong with you?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Dig @1    last year

The lawless antifa and other punks have been allowed to take over the city, with the apparent consent of the city mothers and fathers.

Makes it hard for the peaceful and normal citizens to live and work there. That's coming to an end thanks to Trump's legal use of his presidential powers.

Trumps is a blustering blowhard who exaggerates and uses unorthodox methods of expressing himself. We, mature and normal adults, have learned not to take his words seriously.

Meanwhile, the Dems have very little chance at gaining any advantage at the midterms, we've been telling you why, but you're not listening

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.1.1  author  Dig  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    last year
That's coming to an end thanks to Trump's legal use of his presidential powers.

Translation: You have no problem with lies used to justify tyranny in America.

Noted.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    last year
The lawless antifa and other punks have been allowed to take over the city, with the apparent consent of the city mothers and fathers.

Bullshit.

Makes it hard for the peaceful and normal citizens to live and work there. That's coming to an end thanks to Trump's legal use of his presidential powers.

Bullshit.

Trumps is a blustering blowhard who exaggerates and uses unorthodox methods of expressing himself.

That's putting it mildly.

We, mature and normal adults, have learned not to take his words seriously.

Right.... Just claiming you "don't take him seriously" but still supporting him, voting for him and defending him proves that "We" to be full of shit.

Meanwhile, the Dems have very little chance at gaining any advantage at the midterms

What does that have to do with Trump putting troops on the ground to police civilians against the Governor of the States wishes? They have zero to do with each other. Trump is overstepping his bounds as President, that's what this is about, not about what seats might change hands in the midterms.

we've been telling you why, but you're not listening

I listen. And then tell the worthless Christo-fascist pieces of shit to go fuck themselves. I don't care if leaning right and giving in to rightwing conservatives garbage ideology would get Democrats more votes, we've compromised with religious conservatives more than enough and all they've brought to the table was an attempted insurrection and electing a 34 times convicted felon, profuse liar and known sexual predator to the highest office in the land.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    last year
The lawless antifa and other punks have been allowed to take over the city, with the apparent consent of the city mothers and fathers.

You are spouting fantasy.   Parroting Trump's bullshit.

Why?   What value is it to parrot Trump's lies and to support this idiot as he continues to inflict damage on our nation?

Everything with Trump is a show ... a photo-op;  designed to stroke his ego at the expense of everyone else.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.3    last year
You are spouting fantasy.   Parroting Trump's bullshit.

And yet they claim to not take him seriously. They love to use Trumps lies to attack the left, then when confronted with the fact that Trump was obviously lying, they revert to "We, mature and normal adults, have learned not to take his words seriously.".

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.1.5  TᵢG  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.4    last year

I really am out of words to describe the insanity at play here.   Do Trump supporters really care more about having an asshole railing on the Ds and libs (or whatever) than they do for the health of the nation and the people within it?

It seems that is the case, and is despicable.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.6  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.5    last year
Do Trump supporters really care more about having an asshole railing on the Ds and libs (or whatever) than they do for the health of the nation and the people within it?

That was a rhetorical question, right? I mean, even a casual observer of politics in America over the last decade would have to say "Yes!" to that question. It's not even close to a split decision, it's overwhelmingly "Yes!". Trump supporters want to own the libs, that's it. They don't fucking care about anything else as they have made abundantly clear. Trump "owns" the libs, aka makes them furious and wanting to rip their hair out, just like a parent trying to deal with a petulant child they're not allowed to just bend over their knee and spank the living fuck out of like they were used to growing up, but now they have to coddle and baby this bigot so they don't get accused of being to mean to the man baby in the oval office. And nothing could make the rightwing conservative sorry excuses for human beings happier than Democrats and liberals being upset and frustrated over the moron in the oval office, even if that moron is making things worse for the entire nation. These are not mentally healthy people who support Trump. They are angry, tired of hiding their deep-seated racism and xenophobia, tired of having to live under rules that don't give them an advantage and help everyone instead of being focused on helping white conservative Christians like the America of old was so focused on.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    last year
The lawless antifa and other punks have been allowed to take over the city

What evidence is there for this?

Makes it hard for the peaceful and normal citizens to live and work there.

How so?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dig @1    last year

The Guard was sent in because ICE facilities were under assault, especially at night. It is being done, via antifa or whoever, to prevent federal authorities from arresting those who have warrants out for their deportation. If there is one lesson, we should have learned from the Civil War, it is that states cannot nullify federal law.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.2.1  author  Dig  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    last year

Umm...

"Portland is burning to the ground!"

"All you have to do is look at the television, turn on your television, read your newspapers, it's burning to the ground!"

Address that insanity please. Otherwise get the fuck out.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.2.3  author  Dig  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.2    last year

Quotes are about as factual as it gets when they are captured on camera.

Your beloved, anti-American tyrant is fucking insane.

Address what he said.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.2.4  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.2    last year

A peaceful protest limited to one block is hardly burning down the city. Get Real!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @1.2.4    last year

Multiple people have been arrested following a violent riot outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in  Portland, Oregon , that involved knife-throwing and explosives.

A Department of  Homeland Security  spokesperson told Fox News Digital that one of the rioters had tried to fire a ‘Roman Candle’ firework at law enforcement.

The same person allegedly threatened officers with a large knife by swinging it and then throwing it at them, the spokesperson said.

No law enforcement officers were seriously injured during the attack, according to officials.

While the suspects' identities have not yet been released, DHS confirmed there have been three arrests.

"Unfortunately, these violent attacks are becoming more and more common," the spokesperson said. "Our ICE law enforcement is now facing a 500% increase in assaults while carrying out enforcement operations. "

Multiple arrests after violent riot at Portland ICE facility with weapons | Fox News

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
1.2.7  author  Dig  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.5    last year

Yay.

One more time... Is Portland burning to the ground?

The tyrant says it is. That's the topic.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.8  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    last year
The Guard was sent in because ICE facilities were under assault, especially at night.

Trump uses almost nothing as an excuse to do what he pleases.   

It is disgusting watching people believe this scoundrel and defend his corrupt actions.  Trump does not care about his supporters.   His supporters are simply tools to him.   Trump is abusing the presidency for self-aggrandizement and, basically, for his own amusement.   

How is it possible that you do not see this contrived show taking place before your eyes??   Portland does not want and does not need Trump to unleash forces and stir up trouble so that he can claim to be a hero.   Trump is a psychopath;  he is a mentally sick individual who is wholly unfit for office and continues to inflict damage on our nation.

And Trump supporters keep cheering him on ... oblivious to what is actually taking place.

I never knew just how deep partisan blindness can go.   This insane support of Trump is beyond pathetic.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.9  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.5    last year

Deploying the National Guard is an extreme measure.   Especially when it is against the wishes of the governor.

Trump is putting on a show, and Trump supporters keep blindly defending every sick move he makes.

Irresponsible, irrational, and unpatriotic!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.10  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    last year
If there is one lesson, we should have learned from the Civil War, it is that states cannot nullify federal law.

funny, I thought the lesson was that wealthy white supremacists trying to use religion as justification for end-running the constitution, get their dumb ass supporters brains blown out of their fucking skulls and they rot where they drop ...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.11  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    last year
The Guard was sent in because ICE facilities were under assault.

Which facilities? Under assault, how?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.12  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.5    last year

So… Three people were arrested, allegedly. No identification and no information on charges.

One person allegedly had items that could be used to hurt people, but didn’t actually hurt anyone.

This is the “violence” that requires military action?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.13  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tacos! @1.2.11    last year

Turn on the news:

"Multiple people have been arrested following a violent riot outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in  Portland, Oregon , that involved knife-throwing and explosives.

A Department of  Homeland Security  spokesperson told Fox News Digital that one of the rioters had tried to fire a ‘Roman Candle’ firework at law enforcement.

The same person allegedly threatened officers with a large knife by swinging it and then throwing it at them, the spokesperson said.

No law enforcement officers were seriously injured during the attack, according to officials.

While the suspects' identities have not yet been released, DHS confirmed there have been three arrests.

"Unfortunately, these violent attacks are becoming more and more common," the spokesperson said. "Our ICE law enforcement is now facing a 500% increase in assaults while carrying out enforcement operations. 

"Secretary  [Kristi] Noem ’s message to the rioters is clear: You will not stop us or slow us down. ICE and our federal law enforcement partners will continue to enforce the law. And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be fully prosecuted by the law."

Fox News Digital previously reported that following a Portland "No Kings" protest on June 14, a mob had launched fireworks, smoke grenades and threw rocks at federal  law enforcement .

The rioters broke glass and breached the  ICE facility,  leaving four officers injured.

Officials said the building was later secured."

Multiple arrests after violent riot at Portland ICE facility with weapons | Fox News

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.14  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.13    last year

I followed the link you supplied. My comment reflects that.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.2.15  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.13    last year

From a story released this morning at 5AM in the Christian Science Monitor :

In an interview at the ICE field office in Portland with Chris Hayes, the assistant director for field operations at FPS, the law enforcement officer offered a more measured assessment of the situation – not alarmist, but saying the safety concerns faced by his agency are real.

In an Oct. 2 court filing, the Justice Department claimed protesters have assaulted federal law enforcement with “rocks, bricks, pepper spray and incendiary devices,” have damaged parts of the property, and have impeded the entry and exit of vehicles.

FPS is “stretched to the point of collapse,” Justice Department lawyers wrote. However, Mr. Hayes says, “I haven’t had any issues with morale” in Portland.


The same day, the city of Portland   responded   in a letter to the Justice Department that the federal government appeared to engage in viewpoint discrimination by “providing special access to the ICE facility for social media ‘influencers’ who favor the federal administration, while targeting with force those who use social media to document the conduct of the federal government.”

The city also asserted the federal government is appearing to employ “unconstitutional uses of force” outside the facility. Social media   footage   from earlier this month appears to show an FPS officer, on the street, spraying a protester in the face at close range. The FPS officer has been relieved of his law enforcement authority pending investigation of the incident, according to a spokesperson for the agency.

I think that you and the Federal Government are overreacting. But that is the MO. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.16  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @1.2.15    last year
Christian Science

oxymoron.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2  Thomas    last year

"They're eating the cats. They're eating the dogs."

These untruths and more can be had for the low,  low price of your constitutional government. Don't wait!  Act now!

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
3  author  Dig    last year

As Commander in Chief and the sole possessor of the American nuclear codes, this moron has the power to destroy most of the civilized world in about 30 minutes flat – an almost unimaginable responsibility.

If you voted for him... you know, to "stick it to the Libs," are you proud of yourself?

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
3.1  Thomas  replied to  Dig @3    last year
If you voted for him

I did not, and my reasons for not doing so are confirmed on regular basis. 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
3.1.1  author  Dig  replied to  Thomas @3.1    last year
confirmed on regular basis

Yup. Over and over again.

Unfortunately, the Republican Party in Congress has decided to just ignore it, and to even cheer it on.

Everyone needs to remember that in 2026. Republican politicians at all levels are simply unfit to govern.

We really, really need a new party to replace them.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Dig @3.1.1    last year
"We really, really need a new party to replace them."

Good luck with that.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
3.1.3  author  Dig  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1.2    last year

Good luck for all of us you mean.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Dig @3.1.1    last year
We really, really need a new party to replace them

Says the guy whose party has a 19 percent approval rate.

Looks like your party being replaced is a far more likely scenario....probably by socialists and marxists.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Dig @3    last year

Don't blame me.  I didn't vote for him.  In fact I couldn't vote for him.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  Trout Giggles    last year

If Portland is burning to the ground it's because he lit the match.

I saw protestors pushing back against the NG this morning and his lackeys are saying that Portland is a war zone.

Who fired the first shot? It certainly wasn't the people of Portland

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
4.1  author  Dig  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    last year

He's likely fishing for a reaction that he can declare a "rebellion" in order to use the Insurrection Act. Personally, I think all of this "deploy the military in blue cities" shit is part of a plan to disrupt the midterm elections, and keep Congress in the hands of the Rs.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    last year

No, it was the punks and pukeface thugs of Portland

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
4.2.1  author  Dig  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2    last year

Do you live in Portland? 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.2.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Dig @4.2.1    last year
Do you live in Portland? 

None of these rightwing Monday morning quarterbacks live in Portland. They love to vomit up rightwing media talking points though. Perhaps they're trying to prove how good they are at regurgitating talking points. Maybe they get awards for how much shit they can shovel in an hour or something, because they certainly seem to enjoy shoveling shit.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.2.3  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2    last year

Why do you continue to believe Trump's claims?   It should be obvious by now that he is a pathological liar.   He lies because he has discovered (long ago) that this is how one can get around the rules.   Lying is easy ... no need to be constrained by the truth, just make up whatever reality you want.   

Trump cheats.   That is his modus operandi.   He cheats while others play by the rules and thus gains an advantage.

Do not believe anything this scoundrel says.   Go to alternate sources for facts.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.3  MrFrost  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    last year
If Portland is burning to the ground it's because he lit the match.

I drove through Portland yesterday....it's not burning. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    last year

Lol.  Whining about metaphors.

meanwhile, in the real world, commercial vacancy in Portland hits record highs and the mayor is talking about having to build tunnels to parking garages  so workers don’t have to step in the street and deal with third world lawlessness.

But keep policing language rather than reality. It’s working wonders. 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
5.1  author  Dig  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

Policing language rather than reality? [deleted][✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Dig @5.1    last year

We have to make sure we win the 2026 mid terms , which means we are going to have to make sure Trump doesnt steal them.  Many individual MAGAs are a lost cause and some of us have to stop believing they can be reasoned with.  There is way too much apathy in this country and the hour is getting late. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.2  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

And in reality 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Thomas @5.2    last year

lol. If only progressives could not attack federal agents doing their job, federal property, non antii fa aligned reporters, but it’s just too tempting a target I guess.

its actually really easy to not have the national guard called up.  Don’t attack the federal government.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.1    last year

Trump belongs in prison. The sad part is people like you know that. 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
5.2.3  author  Dig  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.2    last year
The sad part is people like you know that.

And are beyond hope. IMO, people like Sean want nothing less than a ridiculous "culture war" that ends the Republic. There's really no reason to be civil with them. I'm done with giving them the benefit of the doubt.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.2    last year
Trump belongs in prison.

The problem is there has to be a crime for that to happen.  For the past decade or so, there has been nothing.  

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
5.2.5  author  Dig  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.2.4    last year

A person would need to have an IQ of about 30 to believe that.

For fuck's sake, you saw him attempt a coup.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.2.4    last year

Will you please stop your clownish trolling ? 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dig @5.2.5    last year
A person would need to have an IQ of about 30 to believe that.

is that why the left can't figure it out?

you saw him attempt a coup.

When did he attempt that?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Dig @5.2.3    last year

Well, you are right.   Trump and to a large extent his movement, are not defensible. Everyone with a brain in this country knows that, and yet here we are.  I blame the media which has chosen profit and status over the future of the nation.  An actual journalist would have some point asked Trump at one of his lunatic press gaggles "why do you lie every day?". 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.9  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.6    last year
clownish trolling

If that's what you want to call pointing out fact then so be it.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
5.2.10  author  Dig  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.2.7    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.2.11  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.8    last year

Didn't the last election teach you anything?

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
5.2.12  author  Dig  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2.11    last year

Yes, that many Americans are even more stupid than they were in 2016, and that's saying something.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5.2.13  evilone  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2.11    last year
Didn't the last election teach you anything?

Yes... how we vote for Presidents might be broken if one can win with only 32% of the total US population voting for them. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.2.14  Thomas  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.2.1    last year

Lol, if only regressive reactionary forces were not looking for any excuse to gang up on people protesting the methods used to intentionally harass and intimidate the populace at large there would be no need for those regressive reactionary forces in the first place. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.2.15  Right Down the Center  replied to  evilone @5.2.13    last year

When was the last time a president was elected with over 50 % if the total US population voting for them?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5.2.16  evilone  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.2.15    last year

When was the last time a president was elected with over 50 % if the total US population voting for them?

More evidence the current system sucks?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.2.17  Right Down the Center  replied to  evilone @5.2.16    last year

Just evidence that many of the US population are apathetic when it comes to voting, especially during the midterms. I guess screaming "end of democracy" from the rooftops hasn't changed that because they don't believe it. Maybe we should force people to vote?

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.2.18  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @5.2.13    last year
"Yes... how we vote for Presidents might be broken if one can win with only 32% of the total US population voting for them." 

Children and non-citizens are not allowed to vote.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5.2.19  evilone  replied to  Greg Jones @5.2.18    last year
Children and non-citizens are not allowed to vote.

Fucking christ on a cracker... what's your point? Trump didn't even get a plurality of votes, let alone some fever dream mandate that tingles you leg.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5.2.20  evilone  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.2.17    last year
Just evidence that many of the US population are apathetic when it comes to voting, especially during the midterms.

Yes, the system is, as I've said, broken.

I guess screaming "end of democracy" from the rooftops hasn't changed that because they don't believe it.

You'll have to point out where I've ever said that, or withdraw the strawman.

Maybe we should force people to vote?

Maybe we should find ways to encourage voting?

But you still haven't answered my question

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.2.21  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.2.7    last year
When did he attempt that?

I have looked and looked and looked and looked back through time and I can't find that coup the left is so infatuated about. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5.2.22  MrFrost  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.2.4    last year

The problem is there has to be a crime for that to happen.  For the past decade or so, there has been nothing.  

34 felonies.... In case you forgot. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
5.2.23  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  bugsy @5.2.21    last year
I have looked and looked and looked and looked back through time and I can't find that coup the left is so infatuated about. 

You do know that attempted bank robbery is as serious a criminal offense as a successful bank robbery, right? January 6th was an attempted coup where Trumps followers attempted to stop the constitutional transition of power and install their dear Leader as President.

Of course, now that they did finally get him back in office, he is dismantling the protection of our Democracy so that his rightwing Christo fascists supporters can attempt to rule our nation like an authoritarian State in perpetuity. It's truly disgusting to watch such vile rightwing scum rape our nation forcing their wretched conservative ideology down everyone's throats, sending their armed militias and gestapo agents into cities that not only do not need them but do not want them as made clear by the States governors and people.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.24  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  MrFrost @5.2.22    last year
34 felonies.... In case you forgot.

Oh, you mean the one MISDEMEANOR past it's statute of limitations inflated into "felonies"?  So, yeah, there has been nothing.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.25  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @5.2.21    last year

Neither have I.  It must be in the same realm as all the fascist shit he supposedly has carried out.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
5.3  Snuffy  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

I do think it's funny watching the double standards in play. How many currently "up in arms" about what Trump says (granted, he's a fucking blowhard and I would love if he toned things down but that's just not who he is) but were completely unconvinced when Biden was hyperbolic. Examples include (from Google AI)

examples of hyperbole from biden
AI Overview
President Joe Biden has a long history of rhetorical exaggeration, often embellishing personal anecdotes and policy achievements
. Fact-checkers have flagged his remarks on numerous occasions for stretching the truth or providing misleading context. 
Embellished personal stories
  • The "cannibal" uncle: In April 2024, Biden told reporters that his uncle, Ambrose Finnegan, was shot down over New Guinea during World War II and that his body was never recovered because "there were a lot of cannibals" in the area. The Pentagon's official account contradicts this, stating the plane went down in the ocean, and three crew members never emerged from the wreck.
  • The civil rights arrest: On multiple occasions, Biden has claimed he was arrested during a civil rights protest. Though he did participate in civil rights activities, there is no record of him being arrested.
  • The 18-wheeler story: Biden claimed to have driven an 18-wheeler truck, but his office later clarified that he had driven a school bus and once rode in a cargo truck.
  • The synagogue visit: Biden once claimed to have visited the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, the site of a 2018 massacre. The synagogue's rabbi confirmed that Biden had called but never visited. 
Exaggerated policy claims
  • Georgia's voting law: During his first 100 days in office, Biden repeatedly claimed that a new voting law in Georgia "ended voting hours early". Fact-checkers gave this claim "Four Pinocchios," noting that the law extended, rather than shortened, voting hours on many days.
  • Inflation Reduction Act: Biden and his administration have falsely claimed that the Inflation Reduction Act ensured that no big corporations would pay zero federal taxes. The 15% minimum tax it imposes only applies to companies with at least $1 billion in average annual income, so many large companies can and still do pay nothing.
  • Billionaire tax rates: Biden has claimed that the average federal tax rate for billionaires is 8.3%. This figure is misleading because it includes unrealized capital gains, which are not currently taxed as income. 
Rhetorical and political hyperbole
  • "Most extreme political organization": In May 2022, Biden called the "MAGA crowd" the "most extreme political organization that's existed in American history," an example of hyperbole used to convey his indignation.
  • "Inflection point in history": Biden has stated multiple times that he believes the world is at an "inflection point in history". While used to emphasize the importance of current events, this is an exaggerated and dramatic claim.
  • "America is a beacon for the globe": In his victory speech, Biden used hyperbole to foster nationalistic feelings, presenting America as a symbol of "decency," "dignity," and "goodness". 

But yeah, let's all get upset when Trump says that Portland is burning to the ground. Cuz we've NEVER SEEN hyperbole from a politician before...   

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.3.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Snuffy @5.3    last year
Cuz we've NEVER SEEN hyperbole from a politician before...   

They LOVE to ignore every other politician amidst their hissy fits about the current POTUS.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
5.3.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  Snuffy @5.3    last year

Did Biden base military decisions on his hyperbole?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.3.3  TᵢG  replied to  Snuffy @5.3    last year
But yeah, let's all get upset when Trump says that Portland is burning to the ground. Cuz we've NEVER SEEN hyperbole from a politician before... 

Biden did not engage in hyperbole and then act on it.

How is it that you do not recognize the extraordinary and unnecessary actions of Trump sending the National Guard to cities that not only have not asked for the deployment but are actively against it (lawsuits even)?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
5.3.4  Snuffy  replied to  sandy-2021492 @5.3.2    last year

I don't want to play whataboutism. My post was only on how the left is in an uproar over Trump's hyperbolic speaking and not about actions. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.3.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @5.3.3    last year
Biden did not engage in hyperbole and then act on it.

Lol. Let's see, he called a perfectly reasonable voting law "Jim Crow 2.0", filed a silly lawsuit to stop it and then encouraged corporations to wage economic war against a state. 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Guide
5.3.6  sandy-2021492  replied to  Snuffy @5.3.4    last year
I don't want to play whataboutism.

Then why are you?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.3.7  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.3.5    last year

Then you must be aghast at Trump claiming that Portland is burning and using that to justify sending in troops against the wishes of the governor and mayor.

And the facts behind your spin is that the Biden DoJ filed a lawsuit to challenge Georgia changing its election rules to make mail-in ballots more difficult (among other things).   Biden viewed this as disproportionately dissuading black voters.   

Biden acted within our system.

Trump, in contrast, has invented a chaotic situation (incredible level of lying) as an excuse to send in troops into a US city where no such action is needed ... not even close.    His actions are currently being contested as unconstitutional.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
5.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

And yet somehow the cities with the most crime, which according to the FBI is Memphis, St.Louis, Jackson (MS), and Birmingham (AL), don't have the National Guard marching in. Hummmm... I wonder why.... Not.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.4.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @5.4    last year

Hmmm…

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
5.4.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.4.1    last year

I'm sorry I missed that but I would like to point out to you that no one is happy about that in Memphis. Also, he has plans to send the National Guard to Chicago  and potentially other cities like  New York ,  Baltimore ,  San Francisco , and  Oakland, California .

Meanwhile, New York, San Fran, or Oakland don't chart in the top 10 for violent cities. 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
5.4.3  George  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @5.4.2    last year
 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.4.4  Hallux  replied to  George @5.4.3    last year

NPR did find 2 to interview ... some is such a big number,

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.4.5  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.4.1    last year

Announced three weeks ago. They’re still not there. 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
5.4.6  George  replied to  Hallux @5.4.4    last year

Simple math, 2 is more than no one.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
5.4.7  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  George @5.4.3    last year

There is always someone who is happy for something. Residents are split.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6380642701112 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
6  author  Dig    last year

Since the usual trolls only want to troll and not address anything of substance, let's restate the topic for them.

Trump actually said this:

"Portland is burning to the ground!"

"All you have to do is look at the television, turn on your television, read your newspapers, it's burning to the ground!"

Defend that!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Dig @6    last year

Criminal elements have been destroying Portland for some time now. Doesn't that bother you?

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
6.1.1  author  Dig  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1    last year

LOL! Destroying Portland?

Get a fucking grip man.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
6.1.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1    last year

There is worse crime going on in Memphis, St. Louis, Jackson (MS), and Birmingham (AL). 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @6.1.2    last year

The ICE and Border Patrol were in Cicero Illinois, a mostly hispanic near suburb of Chicago, today,  harrassing and arresting people because they "look" like there is a chance they could be undocumented. Pure racial profiling. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.1.4  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.3    last year
harrassing and arresting people because they "look" like there is a chance they could be undocumented.

You have proof of this?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
6.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  Greg Jones @6.1    last year

Seeing people I know to be intelligent, spreading politically motivated bullshit, bothers me.

Ever been to Portland? at all? recently?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
6.1.6  Split Personality  replied to  Split Personality @6.1.5    last year

No witty retort?

Priceless!

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7  George    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1  author  Dig  replied to  George @7    last year

It's pointed at un-American Trump supporters, as it should be, and at this point they deserve neither respect nor civility.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.1  George  replied to  Dig @7.1    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1.2  author  Dig  replied to  George @7.1.1    last year

Cry me a river. You really don't know how far across the Rubicon we are, do you?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Dig @7.1    last year

I am a Trump supporter and I served 20 years in the Navy. 
Am I an unAmerican fuck tard?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.1.4  evilone  replied to  bugsy @7.1.3    last year
I am a Trump supporter and I served 20 years in the Navy. 

If this is true and you still support how ICE and the National Guard troops are used, then...

Am I an unAmerican fuck tard?

I question your loyalty to the oath you once swore to uphold. 

As ex-Army & ex-Coast Guard I'd defy the unlawful orders to deploy.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  evilone @7.1.4    last year
As ex-Army & ex-Coast Guard I'd defy the unlawful orders to deploy.

I would, too, but I bet that would earn us the title of unAmerican fucktard, but not from the author of this seed

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1.6  author  Dig  replied to  bugsy @7.1.3    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7.1.7  Greg Jones  replied to  Dig @7.1.6    last year

Killing drug runners is murder??? LOL![✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
7.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dig @7.1.6    last year
And as a supporter of a traitorous tyrant who has of late been murdering people on the high seas

Who is the "traitorous tyrant" you are crying about?  

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1.10  author  Dig  replied to  Greg Jones @7.1.7    last year

Summary, extrajudicial killing of civilians is a war crime precisely because it is murder.

[removed][✘]

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.11  George  replied to  Dig @7.1.10    last year

So why isn't obama in jail? simply because he is a person of color so you expect less from him?  

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1.12  author  Dig  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.1.8    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1.13  author  Dig  replied to  George @7.1.11    last year
So why isn't obama in jail? simply because he is a person of color so you expect less from him? 

LOL. Huh?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.1.14  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @7.1.7    last year
Killing drug runners is murder???   LOL!  Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.

What's really hilarious is that rightwing conservatives lost their fucking minds when Obama used a drone to take out a known terrorist which also killed his son who was an American citizen but known terrorist sympathizer, but with Trump just taking out boats they claim are drug runner boats not knowing who or even how many humans or their affiliation with any drugs are on board can be just executed without even an attempt to stop the boat and make arrests. Nope, just summary execution Duterte style and rightwing conservatives couldn't be happier.

Don't get me wrong, I have no love for anyone in the drug trade. However, I do believe in the rule of law and that extrajudicial killings are the mark of an authoritarian tyrant, not that of people whose allegiance is to a constitutional Republic. Even with known terrorists hiding in places where sending in troops and putting American soldiers lives at risk, drones or bomb attacks should be a last resort, not a first hair trigger response to any offense.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.15  George  replied to  Dig @7.1.13    last year

Obama ordered the execution of Americans without due process, not NON-Citizens but actual [Americans][✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.1.16  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  George @7.1.15    last year
Obama ordered the execution of Americans without due process

Nope.

  • Strike on Anwar al-Awlaki : On September 30, 2011, Anwar al-Awlaki was killed by a CIA-led drone strike in Yemen. A radical U.S.-Yemeni cleric, al-Awlaki was considered an operational leader in Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and was placed on a "kill list" by the U.S. government, which considered him an imminent threat.
  • Strike on Abdulrahman al-Awlaki : Two weeks later, on October 14, 2011, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was killed in a separate drone strike in Yemen. U.S. officials later claimed his death was a mistake and that he was not the intended target. The strike occurred while he was having dinner with his teenage cousins at an outdoor restaurant. The drone's target was reportedly another Al-Qaeda operative who was not present at the location
Ten Years after the al-Awlaki Killing: A Reckoning for the United States’ Drones Wars Awaits - Modern War Institute

By then, after a legal review, President Obama had added Awlaki to the kill list, authorizing his capture or killing on the basis that he posed an imminent threat to the United States. He was killed in an American drone strike in Yemen in September 2011 along with an American acolyte, Samir Khan, with whom he had published the slick English-language Al Qaeda magazine  Inspire .

Two weeks later, in another drone strike that American officials said was a mistake, his 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, who had left home to try to find his father, was killed. His death generated far more anti-American anger in Yemen than Anwar al-Awlaki’s death.

The Anwar al-Awlaki File, Explained | National Security Archive

We can debate decades after whether the legal advice Obama received that allowed him to add a known terrorist to the terrorist 'kill list' was sound or not, but at the time he received legal assurance that it was allowed and he was trying to protect American soldiers on the ground in those regions. Soldiers who had been attacked and killed by terrorists that were directed and inspired by Awlaki. So, Obama was making a very hard decision of adding an American terrorist to the terrorist kill list because he knew he had to protect American soldiers' lives, not that any rightwing conservative piece of shit latching on to this story to try and attack the black President they hate so much would care.

And of course, back to Trumps extrajudicial killings, he's not protecting any soldier's lives. One can argue that he's protecting Americans from harming themselves with illicit drugs which was the excuse Duterte gave as he went around shooting those he claimed were drug dealers in the Philippines, but that just makes it worse frankly as he's also saying that Americans apparently shouldn't be allowed to make those decisions for themselves.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
7.1.17  author  Dig  replied to  George @7.1.15    last year
Obama ordered the execution of Americans without due process, not NON-Citizens but actual Americans

Ordered? Hmm. I'm only aware of one that might qualify as "ordered", and he was a traitor who became a leader in Al Qaeda when we were actively engaged in military operations against them.

Please tell me you don't think that's comparable. He was on the CIA kill list for crying out loud.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.18  George  replied to  Dig @7.1.17    last year
He was on the CIA kill list for crying out loud.

So the old white guys at the CIA can kill Americans without due process. good to know, so it's just needs to be the old white guys at the CIA doing the killing and you will be fine with it.

Drugs have killed far more people than died on 911, but since it appears you don't want the supply interrupted you are now upset about it?

I'm only aware of one that might qualify as "ordered"[✘]

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
7.1.19  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @7.1.3    last year

[Deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.20  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.1.16    last year

are they trying to tell us that they didn't care if US troops were murdered by  Al-Quaida in Iraq and Afghanistan?

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.21  George  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.1.16    last year
Nope.

You are absolutely 100% WRONG!

 President Obama personally presides over the selection of terror suspects to be killed in drone strikes from Pakistan to Yemen, reserving for himself the right to decide whether to attack a target even if civilians might be killed. By his own insistence, Mr Obama signs off on every strike, either by the military or CIA

If you are going lie, do it about something that isn't easy to disprove.

Obama’s death debate: how President personally approves the drone strikes

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1.22  devangelical  replied to  George @7.1.21    last year

since when do US laws apply outside america, and when did maga suddenly become so concerned about due process? 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.23  George  replied to  devangelical @7.1.22    last year

So you are okay if trump starts killing democrats and any liberal in general as long as they are outside the US. And i'm not the one whining about killing worthless pieces of shit(s) running drugs outside of the US. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.24  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @7.1.22    last year

when it's a black guy killing an American who defected to the other side

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1.25  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @7.1.24    last year
when it's a black guy killing an American who defected to the other side

gee, think of all the christo-fascist parades that had to be cancelled back then for lack of an american muslim exhibit brought back to face justice. probably no need to mention all of the CIA black sites and the establishment of gitmo, outside the US, by the previous bush administration for the illegal purposes of detention and torture. apparently no problems from maga with that shit ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.26  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @7.1.25    last year

We don't talk about those things

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.1.27  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  George @7.1.23    last year
So you are okay if trump starts killing democrats and any liberal in general as long as they are outside the US.

The father was a KNOWN terrorist as was the Samir Khan. Did Obama determine this himself? No, he relied on the American military and CIA to provide sufficient evidence to say they were a clear and present danger to American soldiers and Americans in general and he authorized the drone strike. You can disagree with the intelligence consensus at the time or disagree with the powers congress gave him to go after our enemies, but you can just fuck right off if you're trying to claim some bullshit conspiracy theory of Obama just targeting good righteous American citizens simply because they're not on US soil. That's some wild nutjob Qanon bullshit that anyone with more than a room tempt IQ should be able to see right through. Though I admit, I don't expect many on the right to pass that test so if someone's IQ is double digits lower than their level of bigotry, I guess they won't listen to reason anyway so why should I even bother explaining.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.28  bugsy  replied to  evilone @7.1.4    last year
I question your loyalty to the oath you once swore to uphold.

And I really don't care what you question.

"As ex-Army & ex-Coast Guard I'd defy the unlawful orders to deploy."

And you would be rightfully court marshalled and hopefully given a BCD to boot.[✘]

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
7.1.29  Jack_TX  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.1.14    last year
However, I do believe in the rule of law and that extrajudicial killings are the mark of an authoritarian tyrant,

Were they that when Obama did them?  Or does it just apply when you want it to?

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.1.30  George  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.1.27    last year
The father was a KNOWN terrorist as was the Samir Khan. Did Obama determine this himself?

Who told you this? Obama appointed officials? Do you have the evidence to support your assumptions? or do you just expect less from the minority president because?????? 

he relied on the American military and CIA to provide sufficient evidence to say they were a clear and present danger to American soldiers and Americans in general 

And again i will ask where is the evidence that he was a clear and PRESENT danger to Americans? was it the troops we didn't have in Yemen he was a danger too? he was a propagandist like Morning Joe or CNN. he was not a leader of any kind. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.1.31  MrFrost  replied to  George @7.1.21    last year

So you are defending terrorists now?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.32  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @7.1.31    last year

sounds like it but if trmp ordered the drone strikes against this guy it would have been okey doekey

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
7.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  George @7    last year

And they will remain silent about it.  Seen it so many times in the past.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2    last year
And they will remain silent about it.  Seen it so many times in the past.

Only those who know they are fucktards should be offended. Trump clearly has attracted a large following of fucktards but that doesn't mean all Republicans fit that description. Just like how not all Trump supporters are white supremacists but it's beyond obvious that the vast majority of white supremacists are Trump supporters. Not all Trump supporters are fucktards, but clearly the vast majority of those fitting the description of 'fucktard' support Trump.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
7.2.2  George  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.2.1    last year
not all Trump supporters are white supremacists

Of course not because not that many democrats support him. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
7.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @7.2.1    last year
Just like how not all Trump supporters are white supremacists

There aren't a lot of leftists or Democrats that support Trump.  So, your statement is actually more true than you are willing to admit.

it's beyond obvious that the vast majority of white supremacists are Trump supporters.

Only if you apply liberal logic.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.2.4  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  George @7.2.2    last year
Of course not because not that many democrats support him.

1*an9lEck_zP5fwK31_FGqiA.jpeg

"If you say so sir!"

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
9  Hal A. Lujah    last year

And the never ending magatard whataboutisms march on …

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @9    last year

I know, right? trmp fires on a boat killing innocent people but Obama must be strung up because he went after an Al-Quaida leader who was trying to kill our own troops. I personally don;t fucking care that guy was a US citizen. He gave up his American citizenship when he tried to murder Americans. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.1.1  bugsy  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1    last year
trmp fires on a boat killing innocent people

Were you on the boat?

How do you know these people were innocent?

Do you know what a "go fast" is?

Do you know that drug runners use go fasts to transport drugs to the US?

You may want to look up the word "innocent".

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
10  Gsquared    last year

Palm Beach is burning to the ground. Send in the Marines!

original

                             original

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
11  Perrie Halpern R.A.    last year

I would like to leave this article open, so can we please bring down the tone?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
11.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @11    last year

This article is a COMPLETE waste of time. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
11.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @11.1    last year
This article is a COMPLETE waste of time.

And yet here you are reading and contributing...........wasting time.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
11.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @11.1    last year

That's not fair. It's a good article. It's getting heated but it's good to get this stuff put in the open

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
11.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @11.1.2    last year

The article may be good, but a lot of the responses are not. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
11.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @11.1.3    last year

You can't control what others say. Nothing we can do about the you know whats its here

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
11.1.5  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Trout Giggles @11.1.4    last year

I'm going to leave it open. I just need the heat to come down.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
11.1.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @11.1.5    last year

Got a bucket of ice water?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11.1.7  bugsy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @11.1.5    last year

[Comment removed] [✘] because [of context. The situation was handled.][✘]

 
 
 
igknorantzrulez
Freshman Silent
11.1.8  igknorantzrulez  replied to  JohnRussell @11.1.3    last year
The article may be good, but a lot of the responses are not. 

but this is my first response, as I've been locked out for dropping my phone in a puddle and breaking my laptop all in three daze and confusing it be, cause I am a complete idiot when it comes to i. t.  

I don't remember passwords or even e-mail addresses, but i'm good at creating messes, yet, nothing I do can ever let me compare to you, Mr. Trump. 

The ability to attempt to compare Trump to Biden shows ones intelligence be hide in, or say Trump to Obama, please, spare US All the drama, asz so ridiculous , as so says any thinking momma, or data, but watts the matta, with huge lies when it's a Democratic Republic you despies R US, just ask project 2025 Russ, cause like Trump (I Don't), Russ never sleeps, but many an intelligent American, just might get the weeps, now and then, cause it's damn fckd up watching so many allow this fckd up to fck up US to this fckn point, cause our cities aren't burning, but TGrumps hair, their, and heavy Epstein pants are sure on FIRE this Stupid LYING MUTHA FCKN potUS, cause he deserves all the hates, he Most certainly creates.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
11.1.9  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Trout Giggles @11.1.6    last year

I wish!

 
 

Who is online

CB


130 visitors