╌>

Tucker Carlson Reveals New Hunter Biden Emails Further Exposing a Sordid Web of Corruption

  
Via:  Release The Kraken  •  4 years ago  •  143 comments

By:   Matt Vespa (Townhall)

Tucker Carlson Reveals New Hunter Biden Emails Further Exposing a Sordid Web of Corruption
Fox News' Tucker Carlson has new Hunter Biden emails. They look authentic. The review his ream suggests so, but added some skepticism, noting that if they are fake, we've all

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Fox News' Tucker Carlson has new Hunter Biden emails. They look authentic. The review his ream suggests so, but added some skepticism, noting that if they are fake, we've all fallen for a sophisticated and complex hoax. The son of the former vice president was always an issue. His gig with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company where he sat on its board making $50k/month despite having zero energy industry experience, raised alarms even in the Obama administration. He slithered into this position back in 2014, when Papa Joe was leading anti-corruption efforts in the country. Burisma was being investigated for corruption and all of a sudden, the prosecutor in the case was fired.

It's long been alleged that Hunter was there selling access to top Obama officials. These emails point to that, with Burisma obtaining access to a leaked Obama White House conference call. Joe Biden has said he knew nothing of his son's dealings. Wrong. Emails show Joe was introduced through his son to executives from Burisma. Yet, Tucker's new batch suggests that Burisma explicitly wanted Hunter to ask his dad to kill any probes into the company—and that's exactly what happened. Tucker pointedly asked "Did Joe Biden subvert American foreign policy to enrich his own family" (via Fox News):


The show has obtained new Hunter Biden emails that expose corruption. You will not want to miss tonight's report. Tune in at 8pm EST on #FoxNews
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 15, 2020


Burisma told Hunter they wanted "to close down any cases/pursuits against" its top official in Ukraine. Watch our report here.https://t.co/oJssXS6ADq
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) October 16, 2020


This is what the left doesn't want you to know. pic.twitter.com/oBwQAFogkz
— Elizabeth Harrington (@LizRNC) October 16, 2020


On Nov. 2, 2015, at 4:36 p.m., a Burisma executive called Vadym Pozharskyi emailed Hunter Biden and his business partner, Devon Archer. The purpose of the email, Pozharskyi explains, is to "be on the same page re our final goals ... including, but not limited to: a concrete course of actions."

So what did Burisma want, exactly? Well, good PR, for starters. Pozharskyi wanted "high-ranking US [sic] officials" to express their "positive opinion" of Burisma, and then he wanted the administration to act on Burisma's behalf.

"The scope of work should also include organization of a visit of a number of widely recognized and influential current and/or former US [sic] policy-makers to Ukraine in November, aiming to conduct meetings with and bring positive signal/message and support" to Burisma.

The goal, Pozharskyi explained, was to "close down for [sic] any cases/pursuits" against the head of Burisma in Ukraine.

It couldn't be clearer what they wanted. Burisma wanted Huter Biden's father to get their company out of legal trouble with the Ukrainian government. And that's exactly what happened. One month later to the day, on Dec. 2, 2015, Hunter Biden received a notice from a Washington PR firm called Blue Star Strategies, which apparently had been hired to lobby the Obama administration on Ukraine. "Tucker Carlson Tonight" have exclusively obtained that email.

"Hello all ..." it began. "This morning, the White House hosted a conference call regarding the Vice President's upcoming trip to Ukraine. Attached is a memo from the Blue Star Strategies team with the minutes of the call, which outlined the trip's agenda and addressed several questions regarding U.S. policy toward Ukraine."

So here you have a PR firm involved in an official White House foreign policy call. How could that happen? Good question. But it worked.

Days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine and did exactly what his son wanted. The vice president gave a speech slamming the very Ukrainian law enforcement official who was tormenting Burisma. If the Ukrainian government didn't fire its top prosecutor, a man called Viktor Shokin, Biden explained, the administration would withhold a billion dollars in American aid. Now, Ukraine is a poor country, so they had no choice but to obey. Biden's bullying worked. He bragged about it later.

And it's not just Hunter causing ethical heartburn here. Joe Biden's son-in-law, Howard Krein, is informally advising the former VP on coronavirus policy while peddling a million-dollar COVID investment opportunity in StartUp Health. Politico reported on this potential conflict of interest, adding that Startup Health is "putting the full support of its platform and network behind building a post-Covid world that uses technology and entrepreneurial ingenuity to improve health outcomes." And now, the FBI is investigating Hunter's emails as part of a possible foreign intelligence operation.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    4 years ago

 

[Removed]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @2    4 years ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

The most important things about this scandal are the things that are not happening:

The FBI had this computer since December?  They could at least verify who it belongs to. When asked about it's existence the FBI said they can't comment on an ongoing investigation. What investigation?  They had it during the faux impeachment and never made a peep?  Senator Ron Johnson wants to haul Chris Wray in and question him. It is 18 days to the election. When is Sen Johnson planning on doing it? 

Maybe the better question is what about Chis Wray? Why hasn't he been terminated?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    4 years ago
Maybe the better question is what about Chis Wray? Why hasn't he been terminated?

Trump has terminated so many outstanding public servants, it is a bit amazing that Wray has escaped Trump's wrath.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Gsquared @3.1    4 years ago
outstanding public servants

I guess Wray's outstanding moment was when he pushed McCabe out the door.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    4 years ago

You guessed wrong, then.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    4 years ago

Rudy Giuliani is being investigated for possible colluding with the Russians. When he is jail will you pen pal with him? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2    4 years ago

Who is investigating?  The Washington Post?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.1    4 years ago

The Federal Bureau Of Investigation

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.2    4 years ago

Lets see the link

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.2.4  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.3    4 years ago

Here's one 4 the CIA

it's even dated today...

I'm sure it will be discounted because of  "familiar source(s)", and unnamed former and current officials,

but I always try to be helpful...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.3    4 years ago
The FBI is investigating whether the emails are tied to a foreign influence operation, according to a person who was not authorized to discuss an ongoing investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity to AP. The exact scope of what was being investigating was not clear.

But the report that intelligence agencies have been concerned about Giuliani are hardly surprising. Andrii Derkach, the Ukrainian parliamentarian who is one of Giuliani’s principal contacts, was mentioned in an August intelligence assessment that described a concerted Russian effort to disparage Biden. A Treasury Department sanction announcement characterized Derkach as an “active Russian agent” for over a decade.

Derkach has leaked recordings of calls Biden had as vice president with Ukraine’s then-leader, audio the Biden campaign contends is heavily edited. Despite his own administration’s warnings on Derkach, Trump has promoted those recordings.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @3.2.4    4 years ago
I'm sure it will be discounted because of  "familiar source(s)", and unnamed former and current officials,

For that reason and because it is not relevant.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.5    4 years ago

But John, that doesn't mean that the FBI is going after Giuliani or that the FBI thinks that the e-mails were created by "Russia."  What it means John is the FBI has, once again, got a lot of explaining to do. Keep in mind that the FBI were the first ones called - not Giuliani!  They have had that computer since December and we haven't heard a peep from them!  Tonight more e-mails were released. Tucker Carlson said there is evidence that these e-mails were from Hunter Biden's computer. Politico said that Biden wasn't ruling out anything. 

You know what that means John?

This story isn't going away!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.7    4 years ago

"Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule."


 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.8    4 years ago
This story isn't going away!

There isnt a chance in hell this story will effect the election in a positive way for Donald Trump. It could effect him in a negative way though. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.10  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.9    4 years ago
There isnt a chance in hell this story will effect the election in a positive way for Donald Trump. It could effect him in a negative way though. 

That's an open question.

BTW this election is a lot closer than those polls indicate.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.11  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.10    4 years ago

Trump has been imploding since the first debate. It had a devastating effect on his chance to win this election, and deservedly so. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.2.12  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.8    4 years ago

Supposition.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.13  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.11    4 years ago

Actually, you are wrong. Possibly if the virus had kept him down longer it might have hurt him, but this race is very fluid now. The President made two campaign rallies today, one in Florida, the other in Georgia. He sounded better than ever. That town hall that lefties love repulsed the entire nation and people think he did well against the Guthrie assault. I think a lot of people also came to appreciate Judge Barrett. I think it's going to happen again!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.2.14  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.10    4 years ago

Psst. Covid-19 beats FAKE NEWS!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.15  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.13    4 years ago

Vic Trump is not fit to hold office in the United States. He is a serial liar, a crook, a bigot, a moron and a cheat. It would be a tragedy beyond words for America to put such a person back in office of the presidency for four more years. I'm not sure the country could ever recover.  There is no rule of nature that says the US has to last forever. We can fall just the way Rome and every other empire fell.

I used to be shocked that conservatives, who consider themselves so moral, would support this phenomenally immoral man.  But I'm not shocked any more. The right wing is taking the country down the tubes with this Trumpism nonsense. He will be stopped on Nov 3. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.2.16  CB  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.15    4 years ago

Some conservatives are using Donald, and vice-versa, as a useful idiot.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.17  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.15    4 years ago

I hate to tell you, but we are getting corroboration:

One of the people on an explosive email thread allegedly involving Hunter Biden has corroborated the veracity of the messages, which appear to outline a payout for  former Vice President Joe Biden  as part of a deal with a  Chinese  energy firm.






Joe Biden sold out America!

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
3.2.18  Gazoo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.13    4 years ago

“That town hall that lefties love repulsed the entire nation and people think he did well against the Guthrie assault.”

i thought he did very well against a hostile moderator. i especially enjoyed watching the lady in the background nodding in agreement with trump on many occasions.

Meanwhile, at biden’s town hall he was served oatmeal by midget george and “ordinary, undecided voters” such as obama’s speech writer and the wife of a prominent pennsylvania dem. It amazes me how the dem party and liberal media can’t see how sleazy they look.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
3.2.19  Gazoo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.17    4 years ago

Hey, come on now Vic, the “big guy” doesn’t want that out there.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.20  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.17    4 years ago

You dont get it No one cares what Joe Biden did.  Trump is a disaster and a travesty and  Biden is the way to end that disaster. 

The only people that care about Ukraine and Joe Biden to the extent they would base their vote on it are people who are already voting for Trump. 

Donald Trump is a horrible human being and enough people are going to agree and so he will be gone. Hunter Biden isnt even a blip on that screen. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.21  Vic Eldred  replied to  Gazoo @3.2.18    4 years ago
i thought he did very well against a hostile moderator. i especially enjoyed watching the lady in the background nodding in agreement with trump on many occasions.

She's been on Hannity and said she didn't like what was going on either. A normal reaction.


Meanwhile, at biden’s town hall he was served oatmeal by midget george and “ordinary, undecided voters” such as obama’s speech writer and the wife of a prominent pennsylvania dem. It amazes me how the dem party and liberal media can’t see how sleazy they look.

They think everyone is like them

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.22  Vic Eldred  replied to  Gazoo @3.2.19    4 years ago

That's right, make sure the big guy gets his cut.  That was the China deal I believe

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.23  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.20    4 years ago

No John, you don't get it. Progressives and their ideology are the travesty and disaster. Trump is the way to end it.

Joe Biden is mentally challenged. Should he win he would step down and the radical left will be in control and if the American people think they have suffered from the China virus just wait until they see what life will be like under the radical left.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.24  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.20    4 years ago

some people (those not blind) DO care what Biden did.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.25  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.2    4 years ago

Facebook Zips Up Your Free Speech – Ben Garrison Cartoon

Ben GarrisonOctober 16, 2020

FACEBOOK ZIPS UP YOUR FREE SPEECH

free_speech_facebook-zipper.jpg

Facebook has banned real, legitimate political speech on its platform. A lot of people get their news from Facebook as well as Google and Twitter, but now the Silicon Valley companies run by billionaires think we no longer deserve a First Amendment. Like the communist tyrants in China, they want to dictate what can be said and what can’t. Zuckerberg, like the other social media moguls, loves China’s system of thought control. The Facebook billionaire even asked President Xi to name his child...

read more: https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2020/10/facebook-zips-up-your-free-speech-grrr-graphics-ben-garrison-cartoon/

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.2.26  CB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.25    4 years ago

Now  some of the "unmanageables" seek to overrun and eat the teacher!  Hey!!!! Watch out for those teeth!!!!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.27  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2    4 years ago
"Rudy Giuliani is being investigated for possible colluding with the Russians. When he is jail will you pen pal with him?" 

This whole bogus story about Biden is obvious collusion with Ghouliani and Russians (on top of his prior collusion with Russia) and Bannon's filthy hands all over it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.28  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.10    4 years ago

So you don't believe in polls unless they favor the trumpturd.

Got it!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.29  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.17    4 years ago
"Joe Biden sold out America!"

The projection is strong amongst the trumpturd supporters!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.30  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.21    4 years ago
"i especially enjoyed watching the lady in the background nodding in agreement with trump on many occasions."

I noticed that mindless twit also.  I wonder how much they paid her?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.2.31  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.30    4 years ago

That woman was little more than a Trumpturd bobble head, fun to look at but no practical use.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.3  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    4 years ago

Chris Wray won't 'bend the knee' and its got pundits in a bind with the big guy? Aw shucks. Fake news and lies take time to manufacture and get set to marching. Firing another FBI director again? Talk about 'producing for Jeffe!'

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4  CB    4 years ago
Days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine and did exactly what his son wanted. The vice president gave a speech slamming the very Ukrainian law enforcement official who was tormenting Burisma. If the Ukrainian government didn't fire its top prosecutor, a man called Viktor Shokin, Biden explained, the administration would withhold a billion dollars in American aid. Now, Ukraine is a poor country, so they had no choice but to obey. Biden's bullying worked. He bragged about it later.

Well it didn't quite happen that way at all. I mean, what our former VP has done in an Obama Administration is authorized by President Obama. Hunter Biden is not Obama's son -he has two young daughters: but, you know that already.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4    4 years ago

Actually, it did happen that way.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.1  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    4 years ago

Offer up proof for it. Don't just say it: Prove it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.1.1    4 years ago

It 's right in the article and btw you quoted it.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.3  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    4 years ago

Oh so you believe this that you are told, but not that when the authorities and the former president say it  For the record: that is SAYING it and not PROVING it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.1.3    4 years ago

are you actually trying to deny that Biden gave a speech and talked about it?

really want to go there?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.5  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.4    4 years ago

Just 'prove' it! Some of us have gone older waiting already!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.1.5    4 years ago

it has been proven, you just don't wish to accept it.

no matter, it never was dependent on what you are willing to believe or overlook.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.7  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.6    4 years ago

You can simply SAY something is proven. What are your credentials anyway? Prove it, publicly.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.1.8  JBB  replied to  CB @4.1.7    4 years ago

You probably need to brush up on Trumpspeak.

256

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.1.7    4 years ago
You can simply SAY something is proven.

yes, I can, and you can certainly deny reality, too!

What are your credentials anyway? Prove it, publicly.

Man, you are really cracking me up here!

LOL!!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.1.10  CB  replied to  CB @4.1.7    4 years ago

Revision:

You can NOT simply SAY something is proven. . . . .

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.11  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.4    4 years ago

It seems that they do indeed.  Biden is such a corrupt criminal!  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.12  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @4.1.8    4 years ago

We pay as much attention to your sides memes as you all do to mine via Instagram 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
4.1.13  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  CB @4.1.5    4 years ago

It is like waiting for someone to unbend a pretzel.  It will never happen.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4    4 years ago

sounds suspiciously like quid pro quo to me. and I certainly remember Democrats pouncing on that!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.1  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2    4 years ago

Yeah. And so you have proof that the Obama administration "did it": Okay, please proceed with it. The (quid pro quo) proof that is.  Don't SAY it: PROVE it!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.2.1    4 years ago

I have no idea why you are inserting Obama into it. My point was the FBI should have made a simple statement on who the computer belongs to or who's info is on it.

You do understand that they have had it since December?  They are not going to comment on this?

Remember when the FBI found thousands of Hillary Clinton e-mails on Anthony Weiner’s computer and McCabe was going to sit on them until after the election - until Comey thought it would make the FBI look partisan?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.2.1    4 years ago

you have been handed the truth, read the truth, quoted from the truth.

accept it or not, it doesn't change the truth

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.3    4 years ago

I trust that our readers are getting it. Nobody seems to want these allegations looked at or even discussed.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.5  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.2    4 years ago

I am NOT sure why you are dragging Hillary into this! Barack Obama was president at the time and his VP acted in an official capacity in Ukraine on behalf of the United States. As to the rest of your "escalation rhetoric" I do not see any proof protruding out of it. AGAIN, I, we, demand some evidence of your claim/s.

Please proceed, Vic.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.6  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.3    4 years ago

So you offer nothing up for review but rhetoric. That is not truth. Material evidence is truth!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.7  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.4    4 years ago

More rhetoric - FAKE NEWS! AGAIN, "getting it" requires something material to review, study, comprehend, and then remark on!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.8  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.2.6    4 years ago

if you are unwilling even to believe Biden, then there is nothing to discuss, but when you can accept the facts, get back to me.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.9  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.8    4 years ago

Get back to you for more fake news and rhetoric? Material evidence is mandatory, Texan!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.10  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.2.9    4 years ago

read carefully, look at the words. think about what you are seeing and stop projecting.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.11  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.2.5    4 years ago
and his VP acted in an official capacity in Ukraine on behalf of the United States.

He did. It sounds like he acted to protect his rotten son.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.12  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.11    4 years ago

If you KNOW how it sounds, then you have proof! Put proof where your words are, please.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.13  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.2.12    4 years ago

That he acted to protect his son?

I have the best kind of proof - Joe Biden told us himself:

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.14  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.13    4 years ago

Fake News!  Why are you producing this ANNOTATED AND HEAVILY EDITED version of this video, Vic? Are you aware there is a longer version?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.15  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.2.14    4 years ago

Does the longer version change what Biden said?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.16  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.15    4 years ago

Are you aware there is a longer ANNOTATED AND UNEDITED version?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.17  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.2.16    4 years ago

Why is that relevant?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.18  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.17    4 years ago

It is relevant if you answer the question:  AGAIN: Are you aware there is a longer (UNANNOTATED AND UNEDITED) version?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.19  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.2.16    4 years ago

does it say Biden didn't say what he said?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.20  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @4.2.18    4 years ago

No it isn't. There is no more context in the longer version. What Joe said was damning. Sorry, you are in denial of the truth.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.21  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.19    4 years ago

You should feel compelled to ask Vic Eldred!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.2.22  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.2.21    4 years ago

he has answered it, but you won't

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.2.23  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.20    4 years ago

Rhetoric. You think everything any democrat says is damning. That means your judgement is likely clouded. And you did not answer the question @4.2.18. Why is it important to you to not answer that specific question?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.24  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.20    4 years ago
Sorry, you are in denial of the truth.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4    4 years ago

are you denying that Biden gave that speech?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.1  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3    4 years ago

Prove the claim of quid pro quo; present material evidence. Please proceed.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.2  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.1    4 years ago

man, did you read what you quoted?

you're cracking me up!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.3  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.2    4 years ago

Deflection is not material evidence of a quid pro quo in government, Texan1211!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.4  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.3    4 years ago

gee, " do thus, or we won't do that" is pretty classic quid pro quo.

Maybe its different on your planet.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.5  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.4    4 years ago

Okay, I am not interested in anything meager. No evidence? Let's move on.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.6  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.5    4 years ago

buh-bye

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.7  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.3    4 years ago

I sure hope the Rolling Stone isn't too far right for ya!

Or maybe this will work for ya!

Or this:

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/may/07/viral-image/fact-checking-joe-biden-hunter-biden-and-ukraine/

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.8  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.7    4 years ago

What exactly are you intending to prove here: 1. Something about bragging.  2. Quid pro quo.  3. Both. 4. Something else.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.9  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.8    4 years ago

Never mind.

I thought I was dealing with someone serious.

Good night.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.10  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.9    4 years ago

It is unAmerican to promulgate international propaganda. There is no proper reward coming!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.11  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.10    4 years ago

jrSmiley_35_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.12  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.11    4 years ago

Rudy Giuliani is a Russian asset. And it gets worse. The White House/Trump Administration was warned Giuliani was compromised and it didn't care. So here some conservatives are carrying unAmerican Fox News 'noise'!

We know Donald Trump is unAmerican in his actions/activities: What does it suggest about his surrogates scattered on social media?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.13  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.3.12    4 years ago

Deflection, deflection, deflection.

Why?

Why persist in deflecting?

Heck, if I didn't know any better, i would swear you took lessons from or are working for CNN!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.3.14  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.13    4 years ago

Look who is talking about deflecting. . . what a hoot!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.15  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @4.3.14    4 years ago
Look who is talking about deflecting. . . what a hoot!

Your personal comments about me are not necessary.

Now, if you actually have anything to say on topic.....................

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.3.16  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @4.3.15    4 years ago

LOL!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.3.17  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @4.3.16    4 years ago

So, still nothing on topic.

LOL!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
4.3.18  CB  replied to  Tessylo @4.3.14    4 years ago

I was about to say the same thing about some "projectionists" here! Good call!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

Let's see if the emails are valid. Biden hasn't denied their authenticity. And those videos of him doing crack don't appear fake...

Then we can watch all the people who obsessed about Trump's illegally leaked tax returns claim it's beyond the pale to discuss possibly hacked emails. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    4 years ago

Biden does not owe you any explanation for his son's actions/activities. Hunter is not running for anything. What next - we will check the background of candidates moms?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  CB @5.1    4 years ago
Biden does not owe you any explanation for his son's actions/activitie

Biden met a Burisma rep  and lied about it. This isn't just about Hunter cashing in on his father's position as VP to make millions. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.1    4 years ago

Sean , should people vote for Donald Trump because Hunter Biden was on the make in Ukraine? 

Please tell me you are joking because that is a damn hilarious idea. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1.3  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.1    4 years ago

What? Be clear, please.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

According to Laura Ingraham - one of the people involved in the Biden e-mails has just corroborated some of the info.

Developing story.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    4 years ago

Laura Ingraham has little to limited credibility. Besides it does not matter anyway. What is Hunter running for again?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1    4 years ago

no one is claiming Hunter is running for office. 

but his daddy is, and there might be some explanation forthcoming.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @6.1    4 years ago

According to those e-mails Joe got money too!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.3  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.1    4 years ago

It is pathetic. Pathetic. Some conservatives can't cut the mustard with the candidate so they smear his son, his only son, in some foolhardy attempt to gain sympathy for a man who is literally sickening people  he promised to protect in this nation. It's all a big lie from liars and schemers. Topsy-turvy world world of cutthroat running rampage, it is! Break out the ropes and lasso this dumbness: Save lives.

No proof for this FAKE NEWS  so we are "HERE"

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.4  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.2    4 years ago

FAKE NEWS. Supposition.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  CB @6.1.4    4 years ago

You were given proof. You denied it.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.6  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.5    4 years ago

That was not proof. It was an ANNOTATED AND EDITED "packaged" video propaganda ploy. And you have yet to answer the question:

AGAIN: Are you individually aware there is a longer (UNANNOTATED AND UNEDITED) version of the video @4.2.13?

For honesty sake already!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.7  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.2    4 years ago

This is digression. He-say - He say. We need objective proof!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.3    4 years ago

lmao.

every time something comes out the left doesn't like, they screech fake news.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.9  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.8    4 years ago

Deflection is not evidence!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.10  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.9    4 years ago

Screeching fake news isn't shit.

Denying reality and Joe Biden's own words is foolish.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.1.11  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.5    4 years ago
You were given proof. You denied it.

What the fuck are you talking about? You gave no proof.

"one of the people involved in the Biden e-mails has just corroborated some of the info"

Can you get any more vague? What person? What did they corroborate? None of those answers are in the Fox bullshit narrative link you provide.

"Sources told Fox News that "the big guy" is a reference to the former vice president."

What fucking sources? I can't imagine anyone with more than half a brain would even entertain this nonsense for more than two seconds. It's total bullshit conjecture on the face of it, but some dumb shits claim this is proof? I feel sad for those obviously uninformed ignoramuses'.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.12  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.10    4 years ago

I sense anger and hostility emanating from your comment.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.12    4 years ago
I sense anger and hostility emanating from your comment.

Your feelings don't interest me.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.14  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.13    4 years ago

It appears to have occurred, nonetheless.  Chuckles.) 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.14    4 years ago

jrSmiley_74_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.16  Tessylo  replied to  CB @6.1    4 years ago

No one on Faux 'news' has any credibility.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
6.1.17  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.10    4 years ago

Yet Trump does it at every rally. He must look foolish, too.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.18  Texan1211  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @6.1.17    4 years ago

I must have gone to the wrong seed, I could have sworn this was one about Biden.

I guess it must have mentioned Trump somewhere in the article, but I'll be damned if I can find a reference to Trump in it.

THIS is the problem I have with "on topic" and "off topic".

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    4 years ago

Independent verification of the emails is a big deal.

There is no justification for censoring it. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.2    4 years ago
Independent verification of the emails is a big deal.

Like I said - this story is not going away. The President will use it in every rally. Joe Biden will have to eventually address it.


There is no justification for censoring it. 

The media is going to take a lot of heat on this. Twitter and Facebook going before congress, maybe losing some of their protections or ability to censor. Guthrie's actions and that of the msm will all be in the minds of voters as well.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.2.2  CB  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2.1    4 years ago

FAKE NEWS! It's exposed already! Hunter Biden Obsession (HBO) desperation!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.2.3  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.2    4 years ago

No one should believe anything thieves drag in. A thief would lie about anything to save his or her own butt!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
7  CB    4 years ago

The Plot To Hack America - Malcolm Nance  Page 14

Russia has perfected political warfare by using cyber assets to personally attack and neutralize political opponents. They call it Kompromat. They hack into computers or phones to gather intelligence, expose this intelligence (or false data they manufacture out of whole cloth) through the media or create scandal, and thereby knock an opponent or nation out of the game. Russia has attacked Estonia, the Ukraine, and Western nations using just these cyberwarfare methods. At some point Russia apparently decided to apply these tactics against the United States and so American democracy was hacked.

The Plot To Hack America - Malcolm Nance  Page 14.

President Donald Trump continues to sat on his FAT ASS and allow Russia to pollute the election process with kompromat and has a FOX News assist! 

Moreover what does that say about Trump surrogates promoting disinformation and manufactured data on social media?

It is a shame! We see y'all! UnAMERICAN!

 
 

Who is online

Freefaller
Snuffy


96 visitors