╌>

President Trump: This may be the most important speech I've ever made....

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tig  •  4 years ago  •  223 comments

By:   YouTube

President Trump: This may be the most important speech I've ever made....
This is beyond pathetic.

Is this man insane?


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T






Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1  seeder  TᵢG    4 years ago

I am speechless.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @1    4 years ago
This is beyond pathetic. Is this man insane?
 
sorry, I could only watch 16 minutes of this moron go on some kind of greatest election lies he's told in the last 6 months riff. the most tactful thing I can think to say is that he most definitely knows his base.
 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Ender  replied to  devangelical @1.1    4 years ago

I just read about what he says. I can't stand listening to him.

His voice is like nails on a chalkboard to me.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ender @1.1.1    4 years ago
I can't stand listening to him.

You have to have a head full of shit already to enjoy having more shit shoved in your ears.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
1.1.3  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  devangelical @1.1    4 years ago
sorry, I could only watch 16 minutes of this moron

I was struggling at the 30 second mark.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @1.1.3    4 years ago

I wonder who wrote and filmed that debacle for the comb over clown.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
1.1.5  Raven Wing  replied to  Ender @1.1.1    4 years ago
His voice is like nails on a chalkboard to me.

Even worse to me, is watching him talk. His mouth is such a mess of forms is takes, mostly when it looks like an a-hole as he speaks. (shudder)

I could not stand to hear him talk after the first 3 minutes. His lies and egotistical ME ME I I aggrandisement BS is just sickening. He makes me want to vomit. Although, that is nothing new, it goes back to early 2016. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.1.6  CB  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.5    4 years ago

Emphatically. And he rarely ever self-corrects. "China-virus." He says day, after week, after months. He never tires of his own mind-craft. Four years in and he still gaslights this nation each day.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
1.1.7  pat wilson  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @1.1.3    4 years ago

I kept skipping ahead, watched about 5 minutes total, trying to avoid nausea. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  pat wilson @1.1.7    4 years ago

At least you all listen to it even for just a few seconds.

I won't watch it at all

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1.9  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Ender @1.1.1    4 years ago

His voice makes my teeth itch.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.1.10  CB  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.1.9    4 years ago

His voice, his facial 'ticks,' and oh my the digressions! Trump is a disaster!!

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
1.1.11  Raven Wing  replied to  CB @1.1.10    4 years ago

I can't stand to watch his talk. His mouth and body language is sickening. He likes to see himself as a Mob Boss, and all his followers are his gangsters and thugs that do his dirty work for him. That is, until he has no further use for them, then he just tosses them under the bus and wrecks their careers and reputations, calling them scum and losers. 

And they are indeed total fools for ever trusting him. His reputation has been known around the world for decades, so they should not have thought they would make a difference with him.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.1.12  CB  replied to  Raven Wing @1.1.11    4 years ago

Donald is an ugly person-inside and outside. He makes no bones of holding the world's reputation as the User of users. This was his big chance to sit atop the world and live the reasons for being the boss on The Apprentice!  Now, he has lost an election, and I bet he wonders if Meatloaf along with the rest of those contestants he's fired are laughing at him and his WH cast. There is Ivanka, Eric, and Donald Jr. all lining the table and getting fired by the 'merican voters.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
1.2  SteevieGee  replied to  TᵢG @1    4 years ago

And yet, it doesn't seem important enough to even watch it.  So I won't.

 
 
 
Trotsky's Spectre
Freshman Silent
1.3  Trotsky's Spectre  replied to  TᵢG @1    4 years ago

Trump's state of mind and very limited intelligence are irrelevant. Unacknowledged by the Democratic Party and other far right-wing reactionaries, Trump's thinly veiled call for insurrection and overthrow of the US government is driven by objective class conditions which have been in mounting crisis for years. If not Trump, it would be another reactionary figure doing the bidding of this section of the ruling clsas.

Trump intention to proceed exactly as he says is deadly serious. I've indicated this in articles I've seeded and which were routinely poo-hooed on this forum. That said, recall that in 2015 as well, people made the disastrous blunder of not taking Trump seriously then. This time around, the crisis is more advanced. The stakes are higher. And the COVID-19 pandemic is functioning as a trigger event, an accelerate of already explosive conditions lying under the surface. Little time is left to prepare resistance to führur Trump's post-democracy regime .

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
1.3.1  Thomas  replied to  Trotsky's Spectre @1.3    4 years ago

The media is noticing it, but they are caught in the same trap that Trump has always created: How do you call out a liar when that will necessarily be amplifying his lies? 

The WAshington Post led there online daily yesterday with an article entitled

The most petulant 46 minutes in American history

If you google " Donald Trump most important speech " you see that he is not being ignored, and his alternate facts are being labeled more properly now as lies.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
1.3.2  Thomas  replied to  Trotsky's Spectre @1.3    4 years ago

I just visited Facebook. If my little corner of the country, or maybe the summation of my FB friends, there is an agonizingly large segment saying that they can not see anybody else in office and that it will be a travesty if he isn't re-elected. This was today! 

Sometimes I think that the whole country has lost it's mind.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
1.3.3  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Thomas @1.3.2    4 years ago
Sometimes I think that the whole country has

allowed ignorance to rule.

 
 
 
Trotsky's Spectre
Freshman Silent
1.3.4  Trotsky's Spectre  replied to  Thomas @1.3.1    4 years ago

If the media is noticing, it's about time. Yet I doubt that the larger point -- that objective class conditions have been building toward crisis for years -- won't gain serious recognition any time soon.

 
 
 
Trotsky's Spectre
Freshman Silent
1.3.5  Trotsky's Spectre  replied to  Thomas @1.3.2    4 years ago
'Sometimes I think that the whole country has lost it's mind...'

Sometimes, I also think ... When I do, I come to the conclusion NOT that the masses have lost their collective mind, but that they are dispirited by decades of attack on working class living standards, and are thoroughly confused and politically disoriented by ongoing political attacks in the form of two ruling class factions spin competing narratives neither of which articulates working class interests. But the working class is/will/must awaken. The only faction which can defend working class interests is the working class itself. The way forward is that a united proletariat enter directly into the stream of civic events with its own demands.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
1.3.6  Thomas  replied to  Trotsky's Spectre @1.3.5    4 years ago

As soon as the people see the "S" by your name, they are going to conjure pictures of Lenin and Chairman Mao, purely as a reflexive instinct of being acculturated in this country. 

I agree that the two parties have got to go. I would further recommend that parties in general be done away with because they are the genesis of the downward spiral that we have seen in the political discourse over the past 50 years. 

The only faction which can defend working class interests is the working class itself.

Agreed. The problem seems to be that whenever a grassroots political movement is started, it is diluted and co-opted by the larger, entrenched parties.

 
 
 
Trotsky's Spectre
Freshman Silent
1.3.7  Trotsky's Spectre  replied to  Thomas @1.3.6    4 years ago

'As soon as the people see the "S" by your name, they are going to conjure pictures of Lenin and Chairman Mao, purely as a reflexive instinct...'

This demonstrates the extent to which the US socialist movement deteriorated. We have a plethora of 'experts' pontificating nonsense about 'socialism.' They have never read Marx. They have never read Engels. They have never read Plekhanov. They have never read Lenin. They have never read Debs. They have never read Trotsky. They have never read Canon. They have never read North. With a gun pointed at their heads, they couldn't name three titles produced by these eight people together. They can't explain Marx' theory of labour, of surplus value, or the tendency of profits to fall in relation to Capital's development. To save their own lives, they couldn't articulate the basis upon which Marx categorized society. They cannot explain Hegel. They cannot explain dialectics, materialism, historical materialism and certainly not dialectical materialism. Absolutely everything these self-styled/self-proclaimed 'experts' 'think' that they know about their so-called 'socialism' is, by definition, hearsay. They have never once consulted original sources for their 'knowledge' of socialism.

Well guess what! I do not shy to take the name 'socialist.' I do not hesitate to declare for the toiling classes who are the real producers of all the real wealth which the indolent wealthy extract from them by coercion. I bear gladly the epitaph, 'socialist.' Even though in the great majority of cases the ruling class has no comprehension of what it says concerning socialism, the word is in the news again. And the working class which is the 90% is awakening to the reality that it isn't doing particularly well. Increasingly, it is willing to entertain the possibility that it is time for systemic change. The ruling class sees the proletarian class consciousness awakening and it is terrified. That is why every nut-job, pundit and talking head babbles about 'socialism' with increasing hysteria. The point not to be missed is that the ruling class has no alternative but to conjure up post-socialist apocalyptic imagery because it has NO workable solution to any of the multitudinous crises now withstanding the great lordly kakistocracy called CAPITAL .

Join me at The Red Flag !

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     4 years ago

Another con job by the flip flam man. 

He has yet to prove one damn thing that he is carnival barking about. 

It's those damn minorities that are illegal and rife with fraud. 

Fuck that bigoted POS. 

Meanwhile the COVID is out of control Americans dying by the thousands every day. The economy is tanking but it's all about him. The ''Liar King''.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Kavika @2    4 years ago

I did not think he could embarrass the USA more on the world stage.   Guess I was wrong on that one.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
2.1.1  CB  replied to  TᵢG @2.1    4 years ago

I will tell you this 'thang' is trying to incite a national insurrection. This is the opening 'salvo' to it. Our constitutional crisis is underway in this stupid creature. Trump literally wants to 'turn over' the election. At what point does this mean a sitting president has gone too far?!

What we are listening too is a very frightened man trying to signal to his supporters far and wide, you know what.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.2  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  CB @2.1.1    4 years ago
I will tell you this 'thang' is trying to incite a national insurrection.

Exactly.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @2    4 years ago

he complains about the thousands of ballots that were sent to dead people, yet fails to mention that most were the people he was responsible for killing in 2020 with his incompetent pandemic response.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @2.2    4 years ago

Please share the link where you came by that information.

Assuming you have one, of course.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.2.2  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  devangelical @2.2    4 years ago
he complains about the thousands of ballots that were sent to dead people, yet fails to mention that most were the people he was responsible for killing in 2020 with his incompetent pandemic response.

Straight.  Up.  Skank.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.2.2    4 years ago

Do you have a link to support that theory?

Or is this all just random speculation?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2.2.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.3    4 years ago

I guess Donald Trump is the only one allowed to make baseless accusations in your worldview.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.5  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.3    4 years ago

Trump just provided a video today (this seed) where he spent 46 minutes lying his ass off to the world (further embarrassing this nation) and you choose to play gotcha games with a member on NT.

Seriously?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.6  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.2.4    4 years ago
I guess Donald Trump is the only one allowed to make baseless accusations in your worldview.

You are a spectacularly bad guesser, and I would give it up if that is the very best that I could do.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.2.7  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.1    4 years ago
Please share the link where you came by that information. Assuming you have one, of course.

You get an A for maintaining your faith in Trump.  Quick question:  How much money have you donated to Trump's continuing beg-a-thon for $$$ to fight the 'fraudulent election' results?  Asking for a friend...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.8  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.5    4 years ago
Seriously?

Yes.

Do you think it was funny that I asked for some type of link to support some asinine theory?

Doesn't that sort of question get asked on these forums multiple times daily? Haven't you asked for links before?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.9  Texan1211  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.2.7    4 years ago
You get an A for maintaining your faith in Trump.  Quick question:  How much money have you donated to Trump's continuing beg-a-thon for $$$ to fight the 'fraudulent election' results?  Asking for a friend...

If you had no evidence to support that whacked-out theory, just say so. No need to deflect.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2.2.10  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  devangelical @2.2    4 years ago

In the US over 7,000 citizens die per day.  I wonder if Donald can grasp that.  Probably not.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.11  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.8    4 years ago

You missed the point.

This seed shows the President of our nation making a 46 minute speech to the world after losing an election wherein he claims massive fraud capable of changing the results of the election.   He offers no evidence, just anecdotes.   He exaggerates, repeats, makes his same old platitudes 'tremendous ... never been seen before ...'.

This is serious Texan.    This is actually important.     Millions of naïve followers believe this guy.

Yet in the context of this seed ... the context of his video ... you choose to play gotcha games with a fellow member.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.12  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.11    4 years ago

Sorry, but only I get to choose what I write.

I make no apologies for that, and if anyone is waiting for one, they have an eternity to wait.

Perhaps it is you who missed my point.

Oh well.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.13  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.2.4    4 years ago
I guess Donald Trump is the only one allowed to make baseless accusations in your worldview.

Now THAT sounds like you don't believe the nonsense about thousands of ballots being mailed out to victims who succumbed to Covid.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.14  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.12    4 years ago
Sorry, but only I get to choose what I write.

Not the point.  

The point is that I think your priorities are out of whack.   You are silent on Trump's international embarrassing charade but instead (within the context of the very video containing his 46 minute national embarrassment) you play petty games with an NT member.

I am sure that is clear enough.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.15  Texan1211  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.14    4 years ago
The point is that I think your priorities are out of whack. 

Okay, that is great.

I don't recall asking, however.

I am sure that is clear enough.

I am sorry if you thought your post was misunderstood.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.2.16  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.3    4 years ago
Do you have a link to support that theory?

Here's your random speculation:

US All Key Metrics | The COVID Tracking Project

Today's totals (as of 7:45 CST)   

New Patients  195,695

Hospitalizations  100,226

Deaths  2,733

Trump's only care?  His imagined mistreatment.  Oh - and his golf game.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.17  Texan1211  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.2.16    4 years ago

You should read the posts and see what the link asked for was in regards to.

Or not.....................do it only if you want your statements to be relevant to the conversation.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.2.18  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.6    4 years ago
I would give it up if that is the very best that I could do

And yet, here you are.  Still.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.19  Texan1211  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.2.18    4 years ago

Really doesn't appear you are following very closely here.

Still.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.2.20  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.11    4 years ago
"Millions of naïve followers believe this guy."

Including members on this very site, as we have all seen.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.21  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.2.20    4 years ago

Stubbornly so.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.22  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.21    4 years ago

troll(s)

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.2.23  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.13    4 years ago

I know of at least one, my father in law received a ballot posthumously. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.2.24  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.5    4 years ago

Most news outlets aren't even airing his speeches any longer because they are so out there and a total lie fests.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.2.25  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @2.2.24    4 years ago

… and it is a national embarrassment

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.2.26  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  TᵢG @2.2.25    4 years ago

Did you get a gander of Trump's newest star witness?  She was obviously impaired, spouting lies, false data and of course no evidence.  She sounded like Kate McKinnen (SNL) if Kate were doing a bad imitation of herself.  Even farting Rudy tried to get her to pump her brakes to no avail.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.27  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.2.23    4 years ago

jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.2.28  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.27    4 years ago

Stay classy. /s

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.29  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.2.28    4 years ago

Always!

BTFW, one person receiving a ballot hardly supports the outlandish, unsupported claim of thousands of dead people receiving them.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.2.30  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.29    4 years ago

jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2.2.31  sandy-2021492  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @2.2.26    4 years ago
Did you get a gander of Trump's newest star witness?

I had read about her, but only just now watched the video.  She was unhinged.  I mean, if Rudy can recognize the degree of unhinged-ness, it's pretty bad.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.32  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.2.30    4 years ago

Stay classy.  /s

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.2.33  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.32    4 years ago

That post reeks with desperation. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.2.34  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @2.2.33    4 years ago

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.2.36  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.2.31    4 years ago

I would have loved to see a cop approach her with a portable breathalyzer.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3  Ender    4 years ago

He actually had the nerve to complain about Durham not coming out with what he wanted before the election.

There is only so many times I can call him a piece of shit without really sounding redundant.

He has only ever cared about himself over the country.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1  Dulay  replied to  Ender @3    4 years ago
He actually had the nerve to complain about Durham not coming out with what he wanted before the election.

The irony of that is that US District Attorneys don't file 'reports', they file indictments. Durham indicted ONE person and that was through a criminal referral from the Horowitz investigation. 

Considering the FACT that the Mueller and Congressional investigations already contained a ton of "discovery" one has to wonder WTF is taking Durham so long. After all, Trump and his sycophants have been making allegations since 2017. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Ender  replied to  Dulay @3.1    4 years ago

I wondered that too. It seems like it has been going on for years.

Like they are just looking for things, anything...

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.2  Dulay  replied to  Ender @3.1.1    4 years ago

It's been 18 months. The Mueller investigation was 22 months. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Ender  replied to  Dulay @3.1.2    4 years ago

Ah, thanks. I guess I have no sense of time on it as I really don't care. I think it will be inconsequential in the scheme of things.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.4  Dulay  replied to  Ender @3.1.3    4 years ago

It COULD be a useful 'whataboutism' when the right whine about the cost of Mueller's investigation even though he made a profit and indicted more than a dozen people. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dulay @3.1.4    4 years ago

The "right" has no problem though with the insane millions it cost us for Trump to play Golf.

Mueller report cost.

Between May 17, 2017 —through Sept. 30, 2018, his office spent $12,287,852. This includes $7.3 million on salaries and benefits, $1.3 million on travel and transportation, and $2.2 million on rent and utilities. The Special Counsel’s office also says it spent $15,618 on printing and copying needs.

Not included in these figures are “component expenses” incurred by the Department of Justice at large. These additional costs totaled $12,928,000, though the DOJ says it was not legally required to report them, and that they are approximate to what the DOJ would have spent elsewhere if the Special Counsel’s Office didn’t exist.

Trump's golf games cost

$141 million

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.6  Dulay  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.5    4 years ago

Wait till we get the bill for 'fortifying' Mar a Lago for Trump's 2024 'headquarters'. Wonder how much they'll charge the Secret Service for lodging of Trump's detail? 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dulay @3.1.6    4 years ago

As a former President, he already will have a detail constantly. Just like all of them do. Not seeing what you are insinuating. Do you have anything further?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.8  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.7    4 years ago
As a former President, he already will have a detail constantly. Just like all of them do.

Revelatory! /s

Not seeing what you are insinuating. Do you have anything further?

Your inability to understand my comment is on you. I have nothing further because your comment failed to add anything to the conversation. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.7    4 years ago

gee, Jim, guess we are just too dumb to understand.

lol!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.10  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dulay @3.1.6    4 years ago

Mar A Largo may end up being seized by the banks as I doubt he can come up with the loan repayment.  Maybe he can live in Junior's covid cabana.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.10    4 years ago

So, how much is the payment, and how much is owed on the note?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.12  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dulay @3.1.6    4 years ago

I just saw a video that sheds some light on Mar A Largo as his new home.  He signed an agreement that said he can only stay there for 21 days a year with no more than 7 days in a row.  Trump has already violated that agreement having spent 121 days there this year.  Where I doubt the city would evict him, they can revoke his permit to conduct any revenue generating business operations conducted there.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.12    4 years ago

Wouldn't THAT be monumentally stupid of the city to do, and forego sales taxes paid by Mar-a-lago?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.14  devangelical  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.12    4 years ago

pffft, silly zoning laws like that don't mean anything to trump, especially there.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.15  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  devangelical @3.1.14    4 years ago

I don't think it is a zoning law problem, but with the variance he agreed to and has violated continually.  His neighbors can't stand Trump because of his constant landings of his chopper.  These neighbors have mega bucks and the monetary means to go after him.   The pad was finally removed due to pressure.  The city itself is in constant turmoil due to jackboots disrupting their business every time he shows up.  It is even worse when dignitaries visit.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
4  lady in black    4 years ago

I watched 30 seconds of it, that's all I can stomach....He's a lying POS, worst president in the history of this country.  HE LOST.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5  seeder  TᵢG    4 years ago

Trump has no evidence that will change this election so he is doing what Trump does.   He is trying to appeal to his gullible supporters with exaggerated claims based solely on anecdotal evidence.    He is taking normal problems that occur in elections of this size and claiming that this year the differences were sufficient to change the results of the election.

He has no evidence.   Just bullshit.   So that is what he is going with.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
5.1  CB  replied to  TᵢG @5    4 years ago
He has no evidence.

Emphatically. Evidence is the 'key' that will turn this 'wailer' out into the wilderness. He simply can't produce any! As there is none he can fetch!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @5    4 years ago

And his followers on talk radio say the same thing over and over again. If it comes out of trmp's mouth, be sure to tune into your radio at drive time because it will be the same thing coming out of the speakers.

Why are these people so intent on insisting that the Democrats "stole" the election? If they did that, then why are McConnell and Graham holding on to their seats? 

Makes no damn sense

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.2.1  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2    4 years ago

TG I am flabbergasted by what is taking place a month after the election when all the swing state results have been certified and Trump has decisively and demonstrably lost the election.   I thought I understood the depths of partisan irrationality but this goes beyond what I thought capable.   This is borderline insanity.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @5.2.1    4 years ago

Borderline?

TiG...I do believe they have dived off the cliff head first

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.2.3  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2.2    4 years ago

... into an empty pool.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5.2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  devangelical @5.2.3    4 years ago

Not even the pool, just the stakes and lines indicating where the pool will be dug.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5.2.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.2    4 years ago

How did we miss the chance to rig Miss Graham's and Moscow Mitch's reelections?  Boy, we sure aren't all that good at rigging it would seem. /s

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6  Tacos!    4 years ago

At the end, he made it sound like he was going to do something, but he didn’t say what.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Tacos! @6    4 years ago

This is all he has.   Trump utters lies to effect action.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1.1  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @6.1    4 years ago

plus he managed to blow 4 racist dog whistles by my count, after I went back and lost an additional 30 minutes of my life by watching the rest of it. it reminded me of 8th grade debate club for some reason ...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
6.1.2  CB  replied to  devangelical @6.1.1    4 years ago

It reminds me of a man "imploding" or nearing a nervous breakdown. He is truly coming unglued. Everybody needs to be ready for the "big Kahuna" of a melt-down. The man who would be king of the United States is unnervingly coming to the realization that 74,000,000 screaming sycophants is 6M plus to short make it so.

Now he is pathetic. "Chairman Kim" and Vladimir are laughing out loud behind their presidencies for life! "Better luck next time, Donald!"

NOT!

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
6.2  pat wilson  replied to  Tacos! @6    4 years ago

He has investigators in Hawaii looking for the birth certificate, they're finding a tremendous amount of information, like you've never seen before, believe me.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @6    4 years ago

What can he do?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.1  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3    4 years ago

Nothing other than continue to work his remaining irrational lunatic supporters into a frenzy.   

(Note:  I am referring to a subset of Trump supporters.   I think most Trump supporters are shaking their heads and wishing the asshole would just STFU, but even a small minority out of 74 million is a powerful force.)

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.1    4 years ago

That small minority has control of talk radio

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.3.3  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.1    4 years ago

silence is consent.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.3.4  Tacos!  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3    4 years ago
What can he do?

At this point, I'm not sure. I guess I could imagine a lot of things - from reasonable to terrible - but I don't think I want to speculate too wildly. At the very end of the speech, he said,

We will restore honesty and integrity to our elections.

He made it sound like he was going to conduct some kind of extensive review of all the different voting systems. I mean, I guess he could ask DOJ to take on a project like that, but I expect it would take a while - far longer than he has in office. I also suspect all 50 states might not cooperate fully.

If he did start an investigation like that, would a Biden administration halt it? That might not actually look very good.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.3.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @6.3.4    4 years ago

Who knows what that man will do at this point.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.3.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @6.3.4    4 years ago
If he did start an investigation like that, would a Biden administration halt it? That might not actually look very good.

If you think any of this has to do with election reform you are a lost cause. Donald Trump does not have  sincere bone in his body.  You have spent the past 4 or 5 years giving Trump the benefit of the doubt 95% of the time.  How the hell do you explain that? 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.3.7  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @6.3.6    4 years ago
If you think any of this has to do with election reform you are a lost cause.

Try not to get too bent out of shape over this. I'm just trying to analyze what the guy said, ok?

Donald Trump does not have  sincere bone in his body. 

OK, great. Glad we got that figured out.

You have spent the past 4 or 5 years giving Trump the benefit of the doubt 95% of the time. 

Really? Is that what the science says?

How the hell do you explain that?

Why would I try to explain your fantasy data? Furthermore, why would I need to explain any such thing to you?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.3.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @6.3.7    4 years ago

For someone who claims to be objectively analyzing everything, you spend an inordinate amount of time giving Trump the benefit of the doubt. It has been and is bizarre. 

Now in an article about Trump denying the election results you pose the situation as possibly being one where Trump just wants to get to the bottom of problems with the nation's vote counting systems. And , you say, if such an endeavor is undertaken and Biden doesnt get behind it, that would look bad for Biden.  

Where is the nonsense coming from, other than that you like to paint Trump in the best light possible ? 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.3.9  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @6.3.8    4 years ago
For someone who claims to be objectively analyzing everything, you spend an inordinate amount of time giving Trump the benefit of the doubt. It has been and is bizarre. 

No, you're wrong. I actually don't give Trump the benefit of the doubt. I also don't do what you do, which is assume the worst in everything he does or says (that has been and is bizarre). I come at the issue without a bias or agenda for the man himself. I consider that a prerequisite for objective analysis.

Where is the nonsense coming from, other than that you like to paint Trump in the best light possible ?

Your bias is well documented with all the anti-Trump seeds and your repeated practice of attacking people who don't condemn Trump 100% in all things. 99% is not enough for you. This clouds your ability to have an open-minded conversation about anything related to Trump. I see little point in trying to convince you otherwise in this instance.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.10  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @6.3.8    4 years ago

You are making it personal JR.    This seed is about Trump, not Tacos!

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6.3.11  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.10    4 years ago
This seed is about Trump, not Tacos!

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSu93kdcGC0JieiC2qL5XxPVsVg-vGTH-2B3Q&usqp=CAU

55c3c4d5dd0895f5218b4691?width=600&format=jpeg&auto=webp

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNmGFrKri84drUFd8l1YMvwNoOCpAvnr5HSg&usqp=CAU

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.3.12  Tacos!  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.3.5    4 years ago
Who knows what that man will do at this point.

I think narcissism is driving him more than probable cause, so whatever he does probably won't result in much of value. 

As a political tactic, it could be intended to undermine the Biden administration, and possibly boost Trump for a 2024 run. Although, by that time, I hope and expect that Trump will lose interest and the Republicans will produce a less toxic candidate.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
6.3.13  Dulay  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.1    4 years ago

Or, instead of being the Grand Poobah of delusional bullshit, he could direct Americans to review the facts documented by the US DHS, Directed by the guy he fired for telling the truth. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.14  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Dulay @6.3.13    4 years ago
Grand Poobah of delusional bullshit

But that is his skill set.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
6.3.15  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Tacos! @6.3.4    4 years ago
If he did start an investigation like that, would a Biden administration halt it? That might not actually look very good.

Would this be like the investigation into those three million voters that voted illegally and gave Hillary Clinton 3 million more votes in 2016..? I seem to recall, that amounted to NOTHING !

They refused to even publish the results i believe, but do correct me, if i am mistaken.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.3.16  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @6.3.15    4 years ago
Would this be like the investigation into those three million voters that voted illegally

That's what I think, yeah. If it were anyone else, I can certainly see why a person could be concerned about fraud or error in 2020, given the unprecedented circumstances. But once the evidence is found to be so lacking, a normal person would move on.

and gave Hillary Clinton 3 million more votes in 2016..?

And I think this is his basic problem with both elections. Even in an election where he won the electoral college vote, his ego wouldn't allow him to accept that he lost the popular vote.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.3.17  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.3.11    4 years ago

Trump would only eat a taco if it came in a Big Mac wrapper.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
7  CB    4 years ago

He is losing his damn mind. . . and if he is right about fraud. . . then votes for Donald don't count either. This guy, Donald, is having a nervous breakdown. . . call his family to come take him home. History is going to look UNFAVORABLY on the Trump family. The Republican Party is SHIT now!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  CB @7    4 years ago
"He is losing his damn mind."

I have been reading recently that it is now discovered that neurological problems can occur in persons infected by Covid-19.  I have a feeling he could be a victim of that, and that he is now suffering from a deranged mind. 

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
7.1.1  shona1  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1    4 years ago

Anoon buzz. Hmm we are starting to wonder if the Chinese President may have had the virus or is he Trump's clone...the amount of garbage that is coming out of China at the moment having ago at us is mind boggling...geez one nutty world leader is enough but now we seem to have got two..we sure have got China rattled and await with hilarity what is next..so yes you could be right re brain damage in some world leaders.. bit of a worry that...stay safe over there...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
7.1.2  CB  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7.1    4 years ago

Donald Trump was long indulgent before Covid-19 became a disaster. Covid-19 may not be helping, nevertheless.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
8  CB    4 years ago

When someone finally gets injured or killed (as the republicans officials are warning their own party) will Trump be liable for a crime?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1  Texan1211  replied to  CB @8    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
8.1.1  CB  replied to  Texan1211 @8.1    4 years ago

That speaks volumes. Good bye.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  CB @8.1.1    4 years ago

Apparently you can not make a case where Trump could be held legally liable.

Bye!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @8    4 years ago

Maybe inciting violence or depraved indifference?

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
8.2.1  Raven Wing  replied to  Trout Giggles @8.2    4 years ago
Maybe inciting violence or depraved indifference?

Trump has already been doing that even before the election. and even more so having his mob boys threatening those who refuse to support his mania about stealing and/or rigging the election with death threats for their wife and kids as well. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
8.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  CB @8    4 years ago

It might under depraved indifference.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.3.1  Texan1211  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @8.3    4 years ago

In your dreams!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
8.3.2  Dulay  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @8.3    4 years ago

Well gee, they tried to hold Hillary Clinton legally liable for the deaths of 3 Americans in BENGHAZI and she wasn't even in the same fucking country at the time. So why not Trump for 292,000 while he was HERE? 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
8.3.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Dulay @8.3.2    4 years ago

Trump should be held responsible.  He does not even give a rat's ass that he infected his own wife and two sons.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
10  JohnRussell    4 years ago

Trump complains about things that there are no problems with. He's just lying.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
11  Gsquared    4 years ago

Michael Flynn is calling for Trump to declare martial law, suspend the Constitution and civilian control of the election, and have the military conduct a do-over of the presidential election.

He's Trump's boy.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
11.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @11    4 years ago

... rent boy.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  devangelical @11.1    4 years ago

Butt buddy.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
11.2  Raven Wing  replied to  Gsquared @11    4 years ago

And by instigating Trump to commit Treason by doing what Flynn is suggesting, Flynn is committing Sedition against America.

Sedition  is a serious felony punishable by fines and up to 20 years in prison and it refers to the act of inciting revolt or violence against a lawful authority with the goal of destroying or overthrowing it.

What Flynn seems to forget, is that Trumps' pardon was for previous crimes, but, does not protect him for any subsequent crimes, such as sedition. Perhaps he feels that Trump will also pardon him again for his sedition, and any other crimes he commits after each pardon. Sort of thinking he is above the law like all the other Trump puppets.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
11.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Raven Wing @11.2    4 years ago

Something is wrong with Flynn. He's a decorated General for chrissakes! He should know what he's advocating is sedition, insurrection, and treason.

Unless he's always had fantasies about himself being a military dictator ala Mussolini or Franco

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
11.2.2  Raven Wing  replied to  Trout Giggles @11.2.1    4 years ago

I think he is just plain stupid at this point, thinking he can get away with anything and his master Trump will keep pardoning him. But, he may let his mouth overload his ass and find that he has pissed off Trump by having the FBI and others watching him for Flynn's suggestion about Trump should throw out the Constitution himself as dictator, or hold another election that he can declare himself as the winner, then name himself as dictator, which is what he will do if he wins the Presidency again so that he will never have to leave the WH again. 

That is pretty much what Trump has planned to do if he could get back the Presidency again in 2024. However, I don't think he will win again after what he ha done to our country and it's people this time. 

Some of the Republicans may be stupid enough to vote for his again, but, there is little chance many Congress Republicans will be willing to kiss his a$$ again at that time, as they will be looking for a new candidate more to their liking.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
11.2.3  CB  replied to  Raven Wing @11.2.2    4 years ago

Everybody has four years to RECORD Donald "the Terrible" and hit playback on the video recorders of time. In the meantime, Never Trumpers, Lincoln Project, and all you true republicans-your golden chance to rid your party of this lying wunderkind is nearly here! Come get your stuff back!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @11.2    4 years ago

That is why no charges should be filed against Flynn until 21 January.  That way Trump can't pardon him.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
11.3  Raven Wing  replied to  Gsquared @11    4 years ago
He's Trump's boy.

Only as long as Flynn is useful for him, then Trump will throw him under the bus like he has so many of his other Trump boys over the past 4 years. No One is safe from Trumps' vengeance when he no longer needs them. If Flynn is not aware of that, or thinks he is the exception, he will be in for a rude awakening.

Yeah....Trump pardoned him this time, and might let him fry next time.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.3.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @11.3    4 years ago

Flynn is one vet I will never thank for serving.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
11.3.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @11.3.1    4 years ago

Add Miss Graham and any member of The Hill who is a Trump toadie who have a military background.  All of them have violated the oath they took upon entering the military to protect the US from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.  You are bound by that oath even if you leave the military.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
11.3.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @11.3.2    4 years ago
entering the military to protect the US from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.  You are bound by that oath even if you leave the military.

interesting point actually and it can be argued and debated both ways.

There are actually 2 different  military service oaths, one for enlisted members not of the officer corps , which includes that they will follow the orders of the president and the officers appointed over them 

 And the officer oath which simply states they will uphold and defend the constitution, nothing about following the orders of the president.

when one gets a DD form 214 , a release from active duty commitment , they usually have some form of reserve component commitment left to uphold , so the oath is still legally enforceable in case they are recalled to active duty.

here is where it gets arguable and debatable , once that reserve commitment is filled and a DD- form 256 is issued , which is a complete discharge of military service or obligation , to some the oath no longer applies , it is dependent  on the individual actually because there are no legal ramifications if they decide to not adhere to it in the future.

That does not preclude that an individual can not modify the conditions of their oath lets say in the case of someone who was enlisted , to be more in lines with the oath an officer takes , leaving out the following orders part. and simply defend the constitution , again that is up to the individual to decide.

That also brings up a question of which oath takes priority in the case of someone that has to take an oath of office for a position , such as members of the legislature , judiciary , or a member of the executive branch. 

an LEO could be a former military member , but also has to take an oath when they become law enforcement  so which oath becomes senior and the one that has to be adhered to?

and this can apply to anyone that has to take some form of an oath for office or position.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
12  Dig    4 years ago

Lie after lie after lie. Projection after projection after projection. I thought the deceit he displayed on Thanksgiving was unprecedented, but this tops it.

Imagine the kind of mind behind behavior like this. It's disturbing.

Donald J. Trump — the Great Deceiver; the Mad (wannabe) King; Enemy of the Republic.

jrSmiley_50_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Guide
12.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Dig @12    4 years ago

Donald J. Trump — the Great Deceiver; the Mad (wannabe) King; Enemy of the Republic.

Don't forget the master fleecier to the tune of $170-million of his brainless followers.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
12.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @12.1    4 years ago
master fleecier to the tune of $170-million of his brainless followers

And that's just in the 29 days since the election.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
12.1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Gsquared @12.1.1    4 years ago

That's just Trump change, lol...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
12.2  CB  replied to  Dig @12    4 years ago

Donald is having a nervous breakdown in public and in ear shot of reporters! Soon, he may turn on those near and dear to him as he bites in a full-circle movement. BOO!

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
13  sandy-2021492    4 years ago

I am still concerned that power will not be transferred peacefully in January.  This presser, Flynn's statements, diGenova's statements...These are calls to arms, and I'm afraid some idiots will answer that call.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1  CB  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13    4 years ago

It won't work out for Donald. Wwe won't swear fealty to him and other nations will isolate our fool of a 'leader' and laugh at Donald all the while.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.2  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13    4 years ago

While this latest speech makes me question Trump's sanity, I am not concerned about the peaceful transfer of power.  The mass of our constitutional Republic will not give way to a lunatic ex-PotUS and a few deranged followers.

I actually wonder how many Trump supporters can cling to the idea that this guy is rational.   The crazier his claims, logically the fewer will be his supporters.   

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.2.1  CB  replied to  TᵢG @13.2    4 years ago

We must remember the visible folks who have served Donald. This must never be allowed to happen again.

That said, the signs are there. Donald is silently asking people to choose him over the President Elect by any means necessary.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
13.2.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  TᵢG @13.2    4 years ago
I am not concerned about the peaceful transfer of power.

I hope you're right.

I actually wonder how many Trump supporters can cling to the idea that this guy is rational.

I know a few who think the election was rigged, but I live in a bright red county.  Final count for my county was 69% and change for Trump.  Maybe that's why I'm more concerned about a peaceful transition - a fair number of the Trump supporters I know don't think there should be a transition.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
13.2.3  pat wilson  replied to  TᵢG @13.2    4 years ago
logically

Has any activity of this administration borne out logic in any sense of the word ?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.2.4  CB  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13.2.2    4 years ago

We did not think we should have transitioned to Donald in 2016, but we did. Don't give Donald the satisfaction of wearing us down. Donald Trump is a walking disaster. The time has come for the Never Trumpers to do something about their party's collapse!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.2.5  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13.2.2    4 years ago
a fair number of the Trump supporters I know don't think there should be a transition

The human mind is indeed capable of spinning and then believing an alternate reality that defies both common sense and that which is evidenced.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.2.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @13.2.5    4 years ago

I'm with Sandy. I live in a deep red state and the stuff I hear from callers on that radio show I listen for traffic make me want to bang my head on the steering wheel. They are so worked up I fear they may just take to the streets.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
13.2.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @13.2.5    4 years ago
The human mind is indeed capable of spinning and then believing an alternate reality that defies both common sense and that which is evidenced.

I watched a show recently on the Salem witch trials and it struck me how similar those religious conservatives beliefs are to current religious conservatives. At that time virtually everyone believed witches existed and were able to curse others and consorted with the devil. Even university scholars of the time accepted witches as a fact of life, yet there was no actual evidence of anything supernatural, just natural events, accidents and coincidences that were attributed to those that the deeply religious community was suspicious or jealous of. It was an alternate reality they lived in that not only defied but replaced common sense and led to many innocent persons losing their lives.

Today we have a similar situation where perhaps millions actually believe in mind numbingly stupid things like all the Qanon conspiracy theories, some fantasy 'deep state' or supposed widespread election fraud. And of course, they blame those they are suspicious or jealous of, those coastal elites, progressives or Democrats and come up with completely unfounded insane nonsense like claiming Democrats eat babies. There are even reports that some of the old religious conservative conspiracy theories like blood libel and other anti-Semitic lies are experiencing a resurgence among religious conservative media. I've no doubt that these crazy folk living in their own alternate reality would be dragging fellow American citizens out of their houses and burning them at the stake for being gay, pro-choice, liberal or progressive if given the opportunity.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
13.2.8  Dulay  replied to  TᵢG @13.2    4 years ago
While this latest speech makes me question Trump's sanity, I am not concerned about the peaceful transfer of power. 

It's going to be pretty fucking hard for Trump and his sycophants to deny after Chief Justice John Roberts administers the Oath of Office to Biden. From that point on, it's on the Secret Service to 'guide' Trump to the exit...

I'm going to wait another 5 days, until after the 'safe harbor' deadline and go to the RW site where I lurk just to see how crazy it will get...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.2.9  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Dulay @13.2.8    4 years ago

Trump will be escorted out of the building.   No doubt about it.

I am still amazed at the level of denial that continues to take place.   I really did not believe so many could be so naïve or that so many would serve as agents for Trump to continue this bizarre charade.   What on Earth do they gain given the price is to destroy their credibility and make themselves look like utter fools?

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
13.2.10  Raven Wing  replied to  TᵢG @13.2    4 years ago
I actually wonder how many Trump supporters can cling to the idea that this guy is rational.   The crazier his claims, logically the fewer will be his supporters.   

Trump may lose a few supporters, but, his rabid ones will still stand with him, if for now other reason than in his demented state of mind they can easily manipulate him into doing what they want him to do for them. That is, until he is prosecuted by NY and perhaps others, and winds up in either jail or prison. By the time he gets out his thugs will have found a new master to follow.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
13.2.11  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Raven Wing @13.2.10    4 years ago
Trump may lose a few supporters, ...

If he does not lose virtually all supporters then our nation is in a very sad state of affairs.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.2.12  CB  replied to  TᵢG @13.2.11    4 years ago

He is not going to lose supporters outright, because they are of like minds. Donald is the tool this kind of supporters have been waiting for to galvanize them into all kinds of actions.Let's face the elephant in the room. If Trump republicans and conservative think they can take this country from the rest of us-they will test the ties that bind. Moreover, it is the only way to process why Donald Trump has been a perfect affront to this nation and why he has not cared to even try to get himself together or on page with anybody not in his "One for All-All for One" reality.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
13.2.13  Thomas  replied to  TᵢG @13.2.11    4 years ago

My public radio station just reported that our local congressional representative, Elise Stefanik, supports the continuation of this non-sense. 

So I Googled it

Pity is, it will most likely raise her support in these parts.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
13.2.14  sandy-2021492  replied to  Thomas @13.2.13    4 years ago
Pity is, it will most likely raise her support in these parts.

I feel your pain.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
13.2.15  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  TᵢG @13.2    4 years ago

Some of his supporters would drink his bathwater if he asked them to.  Then he would charge them for the straws.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Expert
13.2.16  Gordy327  replied to  TᵢG @13.2.11    4 years ago
then our nation is in a very sad state of affairs.

I think it's been in a sad state.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
13.2.17  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thomas @13.2.13    4 years ago

Are you planning to speak up about her to as many who will listen?

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
13.2.18  Thomas  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @13.2.17    4 years ago

I have tried. Peoples minds are made up for the most part. Need a point of contact or two to start a dialogue from. I think that as time progresses it may be different.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
13.2.19  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thomas @13.2.18    4 years ago

Keep up the effort.jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
13.2.20  Thomas  replied to  TᵢG @13.2.9    4 years ago

Ummmmm.... To the victors go the spoils?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
13.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  sandy-2021492 @13    4 years ago

We will call back and they won't like the results.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
14  Thomas    4 years ago

To answer your question: Yes. This man is insane. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
15  devangelical    4 years ago

a record 2777 dead americans by covid yesterday, 275K americans dead from covid by lunch today, and this most important speech of his presidency is all about the alternative conspiracy reality in his defective brain. is it any wonder that no mainstream networks carried this work of demented fiction live?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
15.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  devangelical @15    4 years ago

Now we find out that he turned down buying additional doses of a vaccine.  Then he has the nerve to sign a worthless EO saying we get the vaccines over other countries.  After laughing at this, other countries have already started inoculations.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
16  Kavika     4 years ago

512

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
16.1  seeder  TᵢG  replied to  Kavika @16    4 years ago

Perfect!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
16.2  CB  replied to  Kavika @16    4 years ago

I'm just getting this at the 12 hours ago mark:

1979 Manhattan Transfer: Twilight Tone-Twilight Zone @ 432 Hz (non-official recut)

It's a little campy, but these chillum harmonize the point across the twilight zone. Be prepared to be amazed. And let those speakers rip! These people can 'sang' - honey!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
16.2.1  Dulay  replied to  CB @16.2    4 years ago

I've seen them live every time they came around. Twice in Chicago, once in San Francisco and once in Mountain View CA. They are awesome acapella. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
16.2.2  CB  replied to  Dulay @16.2.1    4 years ago

Just awesome! Yes!

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Expert
16.3  Gordy327  replied to  Kavika @16    4 years ago

jrSmiley_28_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
17  MrFrost    4 years ago

It really is a curiosity how trump, as fat as he is, can still kiss his own ass. 

Then again, anyone that has seen trump dance understands why he has to pay for pussy. 

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
17.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  MrFrost @17    4 years ago
It really is a curiosity how trump, as fat as he is, can still kiss his own ass. 

Ha!!

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
17.2  Raven Wing  replied to  MrFrost @17    4 years ago
Then again, anyone that has seen trump dance understands why he has to pay for pussy.

I have never seen Trump dance. Do you have a link?

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
17.2.1  Raven Wing  replied to  Raven Wing @17.2    4 years ago

I looked up some videos that show him supposedly 'dancing' when the things moving the most are his fists. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
17.2.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @17.2    4 years ago

NOOOOOOO....look away!  LOOK AWAY!

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
17.2.3  Raven Wing  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @17.2.2    4 years ago
If he does not lose virtually all supporters then our nation is in a very sad state of affairs.

Indeed I need both eye bleach and brain bleach. That is the sadist thing I have ever seen a grown man do and call it dancing.  It's more like he is prepping for a boxing match than anything close to dancing. Blech!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
17.2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @17.2.3    4 years ago

He dances like a typical two year old with a full diaper.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
17.2.5  Raven Wing  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @17.2.4    4 years ago

I dunno Paula... that kinda insults 2 yr olds. More like a dog covered in fleas trying to find a place to poop. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
17.2.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @17.2.5    4 years ago

My bad.jrSmiley_16_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
18  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    4 years ago

I just listened to the whole thing for the first time.  I need a drink.  A big one.  That man is the biggest bamboozler/flim flam man/idiot/nut on the planet.  However, he excels at knowing how to scam every penny from people that can't afford it. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
18.1  Raven Wing  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @18    4 years ago
However, he excels at knowing how to scam every penny from people that can't afford it. 

He's been taking lessons from his avid Evangelical leaders. 

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
18.1.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Raven Wing @18.1    4 years ago
He's been taking lessons from his avid Evangelical leaders. 

Thank you very much.  That's exactly what he reminds me of...a lying swindling chiseling televangelist who needs a second jet so he and his wife can travel to different vacay homes on the same day with their 'neighbor'/'nanny'/'publicist'/'long-time family friend'/'wife's assistant', etc.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
18.1.2  Raven Wing  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @18.1.1    4 years ago

You are most welcome Sis. He claims he needs the money to support his 2024 campaign, but, most people are not that stupid. He really knows he has no chance of winning in 2024 after the way he has acted and the awful things he has said and done during the last 4 years. 

While there will always be some who will be die hard supporters, there will be even fewer as the next 4 years pass. He is certain to lose a lot of the political pull he had, and his personal reputation is sure to take a dive when he is prosecuted for his many crimes. He may not even be able to run in 2024 if he is in fail or prison. 

So his lies about needing the money to his 2024 campaign is just to use those he calls losers and stupid.  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
18.1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @18.1    4 years ago

I doubt a lot of people can afford it.  They are willing to give up money their families need just so they can contribute to a con man.  "Sorry my child, but Don The Con needs your lunch money."

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
18.1.4  Raven Wing  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @18.1.3    4 years ago
They are willing to give up money their families need just so they can contribute to a con man.

Exactly. And in that regard, they are more shameful than he is for asking for it.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
18.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @18    4 years ago

I need a big drink just knowing you listened to the entire thing.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
18.3  Thomas  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @18    4 years ago
I just listened to the whole thing for the first time.  I am sorry to hear that you put yourself through that. I can not take all of it at one sitting. It has been more than a week now and I still have not gotten through it. 
 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
19  Perrie Halpern R.A.    4 years ago
Is this man insane?

Yes.... very.

 
 
 
Thomas
Senior Guide
19.1  Thomas  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @19    4 years ago

We tried to tell people....

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
20  JBB    4 years ago

512

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
20.1  Raven Wing  replied to  JBB @20    4 years ago

That is truly a great meme. I really wish someone would do that, it just might wake up his brain. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
21  Kavika     4 years ago

129139328_10208114432854018_2910997006685731019_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=2&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=JEewfIiuAzAAX_7C1Nh&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&oh=4cb609c9157287c6c608436ad20e95ca&oe=5FEE27A6

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
21.1  Raven Wing  replied to  Kavika @21    4 years ago

Great meme, Kavika. Wonder how Trump feels being betrayed by someone she trusted for a change. Barr got the first shot in before Trump could throw him under the bus.

Even his ever loyal Kellyann has thrown Trump under the bus by saying she recognizes Biden and Harris have won the election. That had to really smart for Trump. And I bet her husband is having a great laugh. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
22  Paula Bartholomew    4 years ago

I bet this wasn't in his speech.

"A former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and a member of Pfizer’s board of directors said Tuesday that President Donald Trump’s administration declined to secure millions of additional doses of Pfizer and BioNTech's coronavirus vaccines when it had the chance." (AP)

How do you like dem apples Trumpers?   Remember this when you can't get the vaccine or have to wait a very long time, assuming that you are still around then.

 
 

Who is online

Snuffy
Vic Eldred
JohnRussell
Jeremy Retired in NC
Sean Treacy
Ronin2


82 visitors